<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (infovore)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from infovore</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://mitu.nu/2010/10/22/kandinsky-and-game-design/"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://mitu.nu/2010/10/22/kandinsky-and-game-design/">
    <title>Mitu.nu » Kandinsky and Game Design</title>
    <dc:date>2010-10-25T11:30:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://mitu.nu/2010/10/22/kandinsky-and-game-design/</link>
    <dc:creator>infovore</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Mitu makes a series of interesting connections here, though the conclusion she came to isn't quite the same as mine - which is in the comments. But there's a mass of starting points here as to notions of the "abstract", and what it might mean for games. Something I shall be returning to, for sure.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>games abstract kandinsky writing art mitukandhaker</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/b:680056d4c844/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:games"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:abstract"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:kandinsky"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:mitukandhaker"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>