<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (infovore)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from infovore</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ftrain.com/nanolaw.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/oct/12/guardian-gagged-from-reporting-parliament"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jroller.com/MasterMark/entry/google_teh_evil_cloud_economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://current.com/items/88856223_you_can_t_picture_this"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://www.ftrain.com/nanolaw.html">
    <title>Nanolaw with Daughter (Ftrain.com)</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-17T11:08:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ftrain.com/nanolaw.html</link>
    <dc:creator>infovore</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["My daughter was first sued in the womb. It was all very new then. I'd posted ultrasound scans online for friends and family. I didn't know the scans had steganographic thumbprints. A giant electronics company that made ultrasound machines acquired a speculative law firm for many tens of millions of dollars. The new legal division cut a deal with all five Big Socials to dig out contact information for anyone who'd posted pictures of their babies in-utero. It turns out the ultrasounds had no clear rights story; I didn't actually own mine. It sounds stupid now but we didn't know. The first backsuits named millions of people, and the Big Socials just caved, ripped up their privacy policies in exchange for a cut. So five months after I posted the ultrasounds, one month before my daughter was born, we received a letter (back then a paper letter) naming myself, my wife, and one or more unidentified fetal defendants in a suit. We faced, I learned, unspecified penalties for copyright violation and theft of trade secrets, and risked, it was implied, that my daughter would be born bankrupt." This is marvellous]]></description>
<dc:subject>paulford writing fiction law microfiction futures</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/b:234444581f67/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:paulford"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:fiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:microfiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:futures"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/oct/12/guardian-gagged-from-reporting-parliament">
    <title>Guardian gagged from reporting parliament | Media | The Guardian</title>
    <dc:date>2009-10-13T09:29:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/oct/12/guardian-gagged-from-reporting-parliament</link>
    <dc:creator>infovore</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The Guardian is prevented from identifying the MP who has asked the question, what the question is, which minister might answer it, or where the question is to be found. The Guardian is also forbidden from telling its readers why the paper is prevented – for the first time in memory – from reporting parliament. Legal obstacles, which cannot be identified, involve proceedings, which cannot be mentioned, on behalf of a client who must remain secret. The only fact the Guardian can report is that the case involves the London solicitors Carter-Ruck, who specialise in suing the media for clients, who include individuals or global corporations." Oh, I'm looking forward to the next Private Eye.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>carterruck journalism politics uk law parliament censorship guardian media</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/b:79c8a040db8a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:carterruck"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:parliament"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:censorship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:guardian"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:media"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.jroller.com/MasterMark/entry/google_teh_evil_cloud_economics">
    <title>Process Perfection</title>
    <dc:date>2008-07-15T09:31:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.jroller.com/MasterMark/entry/google_teh_evil_cloud_economics</link>
    <dc:creator>infovore</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The bottom line is, there are laws on the books in the EU that stand in direct conflict with the needs of Google's architecture, and no amount of hand waving will make that fact go away." Smart artcile about the legal issues of cloud computing.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>architecture google privacy law cloudcomputing distributed computing hosting</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/b:f673c842a4cc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:architecture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:cloudcomputing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:distributed"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:hosting"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://current.com/items/88856223_you_can_t_picture_this">
    <title>You Can⊘t Picture This // Current TV UK</title>
    <dc:date>2008-03-21T07:41:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://current.com/items/88856223_you_can_t_picture_this</link>
    <dc:creator>infovore</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Rajesh [Thind] investigates the way we view the lens and the way it views us." Gosh, this made me very uncomfortable and somewhat angry.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>photography uk law surveillance security paranoia</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/b:c13f90cd3234/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:photography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:security"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:paranoia"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>