<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (infovore)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from infovore</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/the-wandavision-cul-de-sac/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.bookviewcafe.com/2011/10/03/tgan-and-tgow/"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/the-wandavision-cul-de-sac/">
    <title>The WandaVision Cul-De-Sac</title>
    <dc:date>2021-03-18T21:10:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/the-wandavision-cul-de-sac/</link>
    <dc:creator>infovore</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This was great on lots of levels: good writing, sharp on the problems of the MCU (and That Show), and excellent on Kubler-Ross. Sure, you're meant to nod along, but I still had nice new thoughts along the way.]]></description>
<dc:subject>mcu television disney marvel criticism grief kublerross</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/b:5fc72e76a767/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:mcu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:television"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:disney"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:marvel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:grief"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:kublerross"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.bookviewcafe.com/2011/10/03/tgan-and-tgow/">
    <title>BOOK VIEW CAFE BLOG » TGAN and TGOW</title>
    <dc:date>2011-10-03T19:49:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.bookviewcafe.com/2011/10/03/tgan-and-tgow/</link>
    <dc:creator>infovore</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I’m not saying that a book that makes you cry is a great book. It would be a wonderful criterion if only it worked, but alas it admits effective sentimentality, the knee-jerk/heart-string stimulus. For instance, a lot of us cry when reading of the death of an animal in a story — which in itself is interesting and significant, as if we give ourselves permission to weep the lesser tears — but that is something else and less. A book that makes me cry the way music can or tragedy can – deep tears, the tears that come of accepting as my own the grief there is in the world — must have something of greatness about it."]]></description>
<dc:subject>ursulaleguin writing steinbeck tears grief</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/b:eb0c0ce7d7cf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:ursulaleguin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:steinbeck"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:tears"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:grief"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>