<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (infovore)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from infovore</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://speirs.org/blog/2011/1/21/how-the-ipad-wants-to-be-used.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://speirs.org/2008/10/28/two-macs-fail/"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://speirs.org/blog/2011/1/21/how-the-ipad-wants-to-be-used.html">
    <title>Fraser Speirs - Blog - How the iPad Wants to be Used</title>
    <dc:date>2011-01-21T13:57:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://speirs.org/blog/2011/1/21/how-the-ipad-wants-to-be-used.html</link>
    <dc:creator>infovore</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The iPad is an intensely personal device. In its design intent it is, truly, much more like a "big iPhone" than a "small laptop". The iPad isn't something you pass around. It's not really designed to be a "resource" that many people take advantage of. It's designed to be owned, configured to your taste, invested in and curated." On the assumptions built into devices, and what understanding them requires.]]></description>
<dc:subject>ipad assumptions computing use fraserspeirs</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/b:afe2c518cd8e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:ipad"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:use"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:fraserspeirs"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://speirs.org/2008/10/28/two-macs-fail/">
    <title>Fraser Speirs – Two Macs: Fail.</title>
    <dc:date>2008-10-28T22:18:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://speirs.org/2008/10/28/two-macs-fail/</link>
    <dc:creator>infovore</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["An experiment I’ve been running for more than two years now is over: running two Macs is more hassle than it’s worth. I write not to praise synchronisation technology, but to bury it." Roughly what I'd always guessed, but Fraser is careful and detailed, and makes some sensible points. I just hope Aperture doesn't chug as much on the new MBPs as it did on the old ones, for his sake.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>sync syncrhonization mac hardware computers computing fraserspeirs</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/b:a395e4dc24ca/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:sync"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:syncrhonization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:mac"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:hardware"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:computers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:fraserspeirs"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>