<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (infovore)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from infovore</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/23/magazine/23Netflix-t.html?_r=2&amp;hp=&amp;pagewanted=all"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/magazine/16-07/pb_theory"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/23/magazine/23Netflix-t.html?_r=2&amp;hp=&amp;pagewanted=all">
    <title>The Screens Issue - If You Liked This, Sure to Love That - Winning the Netflix Prize - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2008-11-24T11:25:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/23/magazine/23Netflix-t.html?_r=2&amp;hp=&amp;pagewanted=all</link>
    <dc:creator>infovore</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Mathematically speaking, “Napoleon Dynamite” is a very significant problem for the Netflix Prize. Amazingly, Bertoni has deduced that this single movie is causing 15 percent of his remaining error rate; or to put it another way, if Bertoni could anticipate whether you’d like “Napoleon Dynamite” as accurately as he can for other movies, this feat alone would bring him 15 percent of the way to winning the $1 million prize."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>data prediction movies netflix modelling napoleondynamite</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/b:c79e12d7f560/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:prediction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:movies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:netflix"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:modelling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:napoleondynamite"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/magazine/16-07/pb_theory">
    <title>The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete</title>
    <dc:date>2008-06-29T09:16:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/magazine/16-07/pb_theory</link>
    <dc:creator>infovore</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Moving away from modelling and into vast-scale collection; back to the ways of natural philosophy. Only this time: we really can collect enough *stuff*.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>biology science data analysis collection modelling scale genetics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/b:d7ed5410e540/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:biology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:analysis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:collection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:modelling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:scale"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:genetics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>