<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (infovore)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from infovore</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arcfinity.tumblr.com/post/89245740023/were-reading-barricade-by-jon-wallace"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.newstatesman.com/200612180040"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://arcfinity.tumblr.com/post/89245740023/were-reading-barricade-by-jon-wallace">
    <title>Arcfinity - We're reading BARRICADE by Jon Wallace</title>
    <dc:date>2014-06-19T12:57:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arcfinity.tumblr.com/post/89245740023/were-reading-barricade-by-jon-wallace</link>
    <dc:creator>infovore</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["There’s a general principle of book reviewing, set out originally by, I believe, Cyril Connolly. He advised reviewers that they should write for the reader when reviewing a book they like, but if they dislike it they should address the author instead. This creates a distinction between a public recommendation, which pleases the author and possibly makes readers interested, and a more personal discourse intended for the author, but which is likely to be discouraging and disappointing... Well then, Mr Wallace, what are we to say to each other in this semi-public place?" Oh boy. Christopher Priest really hated this book (and his argument seems reasonable, to be honest.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>sf writing criticism christopherpriest</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/b:44d1ddd3a52c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:sf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:christopherpriest"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.newstatesman.com/200612180040">
    <title>New Statesman - Imaginary friends</title>
    <dc:date>2006-12-18T15:14:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.newstatesman.com/200612180040</link>
    <dc:creator>infovore</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["To conflate fantasy with immaturity is a rather sizeable error. Rational yet non-intellectual, moral yet inexplicit, symbolic not allegorical, fantasy is not primitive but primary." Ursula le Guin on fine form in the NS.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>ursulaleguin fantasy sf writing fiction literature essay criticism children reading</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/b:b4c68769efdd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:ursulaleguin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:fantasy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:sf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:fiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:essay"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:reading"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>