<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (infovore)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from infovore</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://criterioncollection.blogspot.co.uk/2006/01/47-insomnia.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.avclub.com/articles/starship-troopers,41966/"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://criterioncollection.blogspot.co.uk/2006/01/47-insomnia.html">
    <title>The Criterion Contraption: #47: Insomnia</title>
    <dc:date>2014-02-14T09:47:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://criterioncollection.blogspot.co.uk/2006/01/47-insomnia.html</link>
    <dc:creator>infovore</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This is a great reading of Insomnia; I loved Skjoldbjærg's original from the moment I saw it, and this review really neatly encapsulates why I hated the Christopher Nolan remake so much. It becomes about fundamentally different things, and they're not as interesting as watching Skarsgard fall quite so low and never really recover. Also: I'll take Norway over Alaska any day.]]></description>
<dc:subject>film ericskjoldbjaerg insomnia criticism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/b:a71b39f48aec/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:film"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:ericskjoldbjaerg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:insomnia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:criticism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.avclub.com/articles/starship-troopers,41966/">
    <title>Starship Troopers | Film | The New Cult Canon | The A.V. Club</title>
    <dc:date>2010-06-17T14:54:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.avclub.com/articles/starship-troopers,41966/</link>
    <dc:creator>infovore</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Even if you don’t find Starship Troopers as prescient as I do, the years have been kind to it, if only because it’s now removed from the context of whatever expectations people might have had for it at the time. It seems absurd now to write it off as some silly piece of escapism, as its detractors complained, and the amount of detail Verhoeven and Neumeier... I suspect its future is bright: The line between the world of Starship Troopers and Sarah Palin’s Twitter feed gets thinner every day."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>film cult satire criticism avclub starshiptroopers</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/b:b20cb5a431f7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:film"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:cult"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:satire"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:avclub"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:starshiptroopers"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>