<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (inboxnews)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from inboxnews</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3353441/Google-chairman-wants-censor-internet-hate-speech-Spell-check-terrorism-needed-says-Eric-Schmidt.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/2011/aug/11/tdmet01-ric-airport-protester-federal-officials-pr-ar-1231274/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/freedom/constitution/text.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/271329/constitutional-nonsense-debt-john-berlau"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wilmingtonstar.com/article/20071005/APN/710050869"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1904077/posts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://federalistblog.us/2007/09/revisiting_subject_to_the_jurisdiction.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3353441/Google-chairman-wants-censor-internet-hate-speech-Spell-check-terrorism-needed-says-Eric-Schmidt.html">
    <title>Google working with White House to Censor Internet</title>
    <dc:date>2015-12-10T15:10:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3353441/Google-chairman-wants-censor-internet-hate-speech-Spell-check-terrorism-needed-says-Eric-Schmidt.html</link>
    <dc:creator>inboxnews</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Technology groups have a duty to combat terrorism using tools such as a hate speech 'spell checker', according to Google chairman, Eric Schmidt. Schmidt claims a widespread system capable of doing this would 'de-escalate tensions on social media' and 'remove videos before they spread'. It follows an announcement by the White House that it is engaged in conversations with the technology community about taking 'common sense' measures to prevent terrorism.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3353441/Google-chairman-wants-censor-internet-hate-speech-Spell-check-terrorism-needed-says-Eric-Schmidt.html]]></description>
<dc:subject>google eric asshole schmidt censor internet free speech First Amendment Constitution</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/b:27d824ad4164/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:eric"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:asshole"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:schmidt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:censor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:free"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:speech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:First"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:Amendment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:Constitution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/2011/aug/11/tdmet01-ric-airport-protester-federal-officials-pr-ar-1231274/">
    <title>Man arrested by TSA with 4th Amendment on chest says constitutional rights violated</title>
    <dc:date>2011-08-11T16:20:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/2011/aug/11/tdmet01-ric-airport-protester-federal-officials-pr-ar-1231274/</link>
    <dc:creator>inboxnews</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Authorities involved in the arrest of a protester who removed his shirt and pants at a security checkpoint at Richmond International Airport were doing their jobs and acted appropriately, a government attorney argued Wednesday in Richmond federal court.

Carlotta P. Wells, an attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice, argued in favor of a motion to dismiss Aaron B. Tobey's lawsuit, which claims his constitutional rights were violated. Wells said Tobey had made his point by removing his shirt to display words from the Fourth Amendment written on his torso but went too far when he disobeyed a command to pass through a security scanner.

But Anand Agneshwar, an attorney representing Tobey in his lawsuit against airport and federal officials, said the 21-year-old Charlottesville man obeyed the commands of authorities. Agneshwar said it was the authorities who went too far by detaining Tobey for 90 minutes or longer with his hands cuffed behind his back.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>tsa arrest amendment constitution</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/b:94e292ad75dd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:tsa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:arrest"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:amendment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:constitution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/freedom/constitution/text.html">
    <title>The Constitution of the United States</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-10T20:47:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/freedom/constitution/text.html</link>
    <dc:creator>inboxnews</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>constitution united states</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/b:59f24e76e8fa/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:constitution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:united"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:states"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/271329/constitutional-nonsense-debt-john-berlau">
    <title>Constitutional Nonsense on Debt</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-10T18:32:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/271329/constitutional-nonsense-debt-john-berlau</link>
    <dc:creator>inboxnews</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Lo and behold! As we celebrated this Fourth of July amid the debt-ceiling fight, the netroots and progressive pundits suddenly discovered the Constitution’s relevance in fiscal matters. It doesn’t seem like that long ago — because it wasn’t that long ago — that they ridiculed the very idea of constitutional limits on Congress in economic policymaking, and even mocked the GOP’s public reading of the Constitution at the beginning of the current session.

Of the new House rule requiring a statement of the constitutional authority for bills, Ian Millhiser wrote at ThinkProgress that “the constitutional lunatics are now in charge of the GOP’s asylum.” It was completely unnecessary for Congress to cite constitutional justification for its actions, Millhiser proclaimed, because “Article I of the Constitution gives Congress broad authority” and “leaves budgeting decisions almost entirely to the judgment of Congress.”
]]></description>
<dc:subject>debt constitution</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/b:a33df1ceefcf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:debt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:constitution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wilmingtonstar.com/article/20071005/APN/710050869">
    <title>Senate leader wants constitution change on illegal immigration</title>
    <dc:date>2007-10-07T15:13:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wilmingtonstar.com/article/20071005/APN/710050869</link>
    <dc:creator>inboxnews</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[One of the leaders in the state Senate wants the U.S. Congress to call a convention to amend the U.S. Constitution so states could deny benefits and expel people who are in this country illegally. "It's a chance for us to hold Congress' feet to the fire a
]]></description>
<dc:subject>Senate leader constitution change illegal immigration</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/b:ed8674aff9d1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:Senate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:leader"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:constitution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:illegal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:immigration"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1904077/posts">
    <title>Anchor Babies, Away</title>
    <dc:date>2007-09-30T16:23:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1904077/posts</link>
    <dc:creator>inboxnews</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The Constitution is simple, short and easy to read. There is no excuse for any reporter to write about it, without reading it. The latest example is an article about anchor babies in the Orlando Sentinel today (29 September) by Jim Stratton.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>Anchor Babies Away Constitution Jim Stratton</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/b:f30d11582033/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:Anchor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:Babies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:Away"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:Constitution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:Jim"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:Stratton"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://federalistblog.us/2007/09/revisiting_subject_to_the_jurisdiction.html">
    <title>What “Subject to the Jurisdiction Thereof” Really Means (The Federalist Blog)</title>
    <dc:date>2007-09-24T17:59:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://federalistblog.us/2007/09/revisiting_subject_to_the_jurisdiction.html</link>
    <dc:creator>inboxnews</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I have been bombarded lately with requests to revisit the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendments “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” language. Some desire confirmation whether the language simply implies temporary obedience to laws, while others want
]]></description>
<dc:subject>subject jurisdiction fourteenth amendment constitution united states anchor baby</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/b:db2608e057f9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:subject"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:jurisdiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:fourteenth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:amendment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:constitution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:united"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:states"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:anchor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:inboxnews/t:baby"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>