<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (guardiantech)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from guardiantech</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.buzzfeed.com/charliewarzel/is-twitter-phasing-out-hashtags-and-at-replies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://vine.co/v/Mh5qd0HEpnt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hs.fi/kuukausiliite/This+is+how+a+Helsingin+Sanomat+journalist+tried+to+save+Nokia/a1381288411564?ref=hs-art-new-1"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://winsupersite.com/windows-phone/windows-phone-81-rumors-emerge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/08/the-17-designs-that-bell-almost-used-for-the-layout-of-telephone-buttons/279237/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://wagerfield.github.io/parallax/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://martinbelam.com/2013/gmail-tabbed-inbox/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://medium.com/design-ux/60a90256efe5"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.androidpolice.com/2013/07/22/exclusive-moto-x-cameras-new-minimalist-user-interface-and-swipe-gestures/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://plus.google.com/u/0/+GoogleMaps/posts/4Cm8CfXz2qS"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://mobileopportunity.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/style-vs-substance-in-mobile-software.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://getwired.com/2013/06/12/content-not-the-chrome-apps-not-the-phone/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://stratechery.com/2013/change-for-changes-sake/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-05-02/sonys-first-mover-disadvantage-in-smart-watches"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2393269,00.asp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://9to5mac.com/2013/04/29/jony-ive-paints-a-fresh-yet-familiar-look-for-ios-7/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://techcrunch.com/2013/04/20/cognitive-overhead/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://boxesandarrows.com/let-them-pee-avoiding-the-sign-upsign-in-mobile-antipattern/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.techradar.com/news/phone-and-communications/mobile-phones/gimmick-watch-which-galaxy-s4-features-are-actually-useful-1137782"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://martinbelam.com/2013/ultraviolet/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emptystates.tumblr.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.stephenwolfram.com/2012/12/what-are-you-going-to-do-next-introducing-the-predictive-interface/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/windows-8.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://skeu.it/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://counternotions.com/2012/11/05/sirjony/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.uiparade.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://getwired.com/2012/10/28/ios-is-showing-its-age/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://nointerface.tumblr.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.currybet.net/cbet_blog/2012/08/never-open-external-links-in-new-windows.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://worrydream.com/ABriefRantOnTheFutureOfInteractionDesign/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://vimeo.com/43224490"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.loper-os.org/?p=861"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://notes.unwieldy.net/post/22958656041/the-144-146-165-button"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeeOkHjV7nM"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/03/03/andrew_does_windows8/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2012/01/microsoft-bets-kinect-windows/2/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://icspapercuts.tumblr.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.elezea.com/2011/12/google-path-ui-design/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.flickr.com/photos/codepo8/6100466417/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.winsupersite.com/article/windows8/vx4b2z-140385"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2011/07/google-tests-interface-optimized-for.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.zdnet.co.uk/blogs/mixed-signals-10000051/apple-lion-a-roar-deal-for-the-pc-10023524/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://techcrunch.com/2011/06/03/windows-ate-the-mouse/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://twitpic.com/52u1a7"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://www.buzzfeed.com/charliewarzel/is-twitter-phasing-out-hashtags-and-at-replies">
    <title>Twitter hints rhat @-replies and hashtags are about to be streamlined &gt;&gt; Buzzfeed</title>
    <dc:date>2014-03-19T21:57:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.buzzfeed.com/charliewarzel/is-twitter-phasing-out-hashtags-and-at-replies</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>What will Twitter look like in a year? Two years? A lot less like itself.<p>
At least that’s the impression Vivian Schiller, head of news at Twitter, gave addressing the crowd two days ago at the Newspaper Association of America’s mediaXchange conference in Denver. During her talk, Schiller called at-replies and hashtags “arcane” and hinted that Twitter might soon move them into the background of the service.</blockquote>

"Streamlined" isn't the same as "phased out". But to the average person, the grammar of Twitter is arcane.]]></description>
<dc:subject>twitter ui ux</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:db844fa7a6da/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://vine.co/v/Mh5qd0HEpnt">
    <title>Curtain mesh effect on iOS &gt;&gt; Vine</title>
    <dc:date>2014-03-18T07:08:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://vine.co/v/Mh5qd0HEpnt</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Yes, it's a Vine by Marcus Eckert, showing off his new framework Meek. Hard to decide whether it's "cool!" or "ewww!"]]></description>
<dc:subject>vine ios interface ui</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:5a3e0f60d398/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:vine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ios"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:interface"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.hs.fi/kuukausiliite/This+is+how+a+Helsingin+Sanomat+journalist+tried+to+save+Nokia/a1381288411564?ref=hs-art-new-1">
    <title>This is how a Helsingin Sanomat journalist tried to save Nokia &gt;&gt; Kuukausiliite - Helsingin Sanomat</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-10T16:23:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.hs.fi/kuukausiliite/This+is+how+a+Helsingin+Sanomat+journalist+tried+to+save+Nokia/a1381288411564?ref=hs-art-new-1</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The journalist wrote, inter alia: <blockquote>half a year ago a friend of mine at work showed me a device manufactured by Apple called the iPod Touch. I fell in love instantly. I wanted an iPod, and with that device I could also have convenient access to the internet and much more. I ordered my own iPod touch, turned it on, and knew immediately how to use it. I have used the device now on a daily basis for over six months, and I have not even thought about any manuals. The logic of the device opens up right away. It is no wonder that it is a huge success all over the world.<p>

My new Nokia telephone model is called the E 51. Unfortunately the phone has not been designed in so that just anybody could learn to use it easily.<p>

On the contrary, I think that it has been designed as if its most important mission would be to advertise itself to people who are interested in telephone technology. All kinds of amazing functions are offered on the display, but as I do not understand what they mean, I guess that I will never use them.</blockquote>

But keep reading to find out about the Nokia executive who visited the author of the letter, and what he said.]]></description>
<dc:subject>nokia iphone ux ui</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:ae419e71600b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:nokia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://winsupersite.com/windows-phone/windows-phone-81-rumors-emerge">
    <title>Windows Phone 8.1 rumours emerge &gt;&gt; SuperSite for Windows</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-10T05:30:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://winsupersite.com/windows-phone/windows-phone-81-rumors-emerge</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Paul Thurrott outlines various things he has heard (single-source) about Windows Phone 8.1. The one that seems to have people worked up is this: <blockquote>No more Back button. Aping the iPhone navigation model, Microsoft will apparently remove the Back button from the Windows Phone hardware specification with 8.1. The Back button just doesn't make sense, I was told: Users navigate away from an app by pressing the Start button and then open a new app, just like they do on iPhone. And the "back stack" is ill-understood by users: Most don't realize what they're doing when they repeatedly hit the Back button.</blockquote>

Links to UX/UI studies of the use of the Back button welcomed.]]></description>
<dc:subject>windowsphone back ux ui</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:07576757d5a5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:windowsphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:back"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/08/the-17-designs-that-bell-almost-used-for-the-layout-of-telephone-buttons/279237/">
    <title>The 17 designs that Bell almost used for the layout of telephone buttons &gt;&gt; The Atlantic</title>
    <dc:date>2013-09-10T05:36:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/08/the-17-designs-that-bell-almost-used-for-the-layout-of-telephone-buttons/279237/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Megan Garber: <blockquote>If you look at the number buttons on a phone - smart, cell, landline, what have you - those number buttons will feature, almost inevitably, a uniform layout. Ten digits, laid out on a three-by-three grid, with the tenth tacked on on the bottom. The numbers ascending from left to right, and from top to bottom.<p>

This layout is so standardized that we think about it as almost inevitable. But the layout was, in the 1950s, the result of a good deal of strategizing and testing on the part of the people of Bell Labs.</blockquote>

See the diagram: it's amazing what was considered. They also identified those with lower error rates, and those where it was quicker to key the number. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>design history ui telephone</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:2696a4d01c32/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:telephone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://wagerfield.github.io/parallax/">
    <title>parallax.js &gt;&gt; Github</title>
    <dc:date>2013-08-27T06:01:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://wagerfield.github.io/parallax/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Fun on desktop (move the mouse) or mobile (tilt the device).]]></description>
<dc:subject>animation javascript ui parallax</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:12704d565b9c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:animation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:javascript"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:parallax"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://martinbelam.com/2013/gmail-tabbed-inbox/">
    <title>Why the new tabbed Gmail inbox doesn’t feel “mobile first” to me &gt;&gt; Martin Belam</title>
    <dc:date>2013-07-25T21:47:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://martinbelam.com/2013/gmail-tabbed-inbox/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>My assumption is that the design changes are data-driven around how few people use filters or labels, and how many people “Mark as spam” legitimate opt-in newsletters and promotions when they realise that is easier to do than to actually unsubscribe from them.<p>

But the desktop isn’t my gripe.<p>

It is the mobile implementation on iOS that is making Gmail less efficient to use for me.<p>

Updates to the tabs that aren’t your primary inbox are signalled by something that looks like an email, but actually isn’t. Which is a bit confusing as a metaphor.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>gmail ios ux ui</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:7d76f816ad79/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:gmail"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ios"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://medium.com/design-ux/60a90256efe5">
    <title>Writing notifications that don’t suck &gt;&gt; Medium</title>
    <dc:date>2013-07-23T11:56:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://medium.com/design-ux/60a90256efe5</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Dave Feldman: <blockquote>Good notifications and error messages require care. They’re not necessarily hard, but they are often overlooked – to the detriment of your overall product experience. Because notifications often occur at times of anxiety and annoyance, a bad notification can ruin your UX; while a good notification can take a moment of frustration and turn it around.</blockquote>

He doesn't deal with the notifications that roll over the top of iOS's screen, which can be a hazard - to put it mildly - if you're trying to interact with a screen element up there. A useful piece, though.]]></description>
<dc:subject>ux ui ios android</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:8fd2c0d6edd6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ios"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.androidpolice.com/2013/07/22/exclusive-moto-x-cameras-new-minimalist-user-interface-and-swipe-gestures/">
    <title>Exclusive: Moto X camera's new minimalist user interface and swipe gestures &gt;&gt; Android Police</title>
    <dc:date>2013-07-23T05:37:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.androidpolice.com/2013/07/22/exclusive-moto-x-cameras-new-minimalist-user-interface-and-swipe-gestures/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The latest tidbits of information from an anonymous tipster is the new camera interface for the Moto X, which is considerably different from both previous "skinned" Motorola phones and the AOSP camera apps in both Android 4.2 and what we've seen of 4.3. It's a lot cleaner than both, with a big focus on gestures and unobtrusive controls.</blockquote>

These look intriguing, and having easily accessible alternative camera settings feels like the wave of the future (as point-and-shoot phone pictures become a commodity). How easy though is it to remember the right gestures when in a rush?]]></description>
<dc:subject>motorola motox ux gestures ui</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:1b2a634bd507/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:motorola"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:motox"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:gestures"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://plus.google.com/u/0/+GoogleMaps/posts/4Cm8CfXz2qS">
    <title>We’ve been happy to hear so many of you enjoying the interface &gt;&gt; Google Maps on Google+</title>
    <dc:date>2013-07-11T10:03:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://plus.google.com/u/0/+GoogleMaps/posts/4Cm8CfXz2qS</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>We’ve been happy to hear so many of you enjoying the interface and features of the new Google Maps app for Android, but we know some of you are missing an easy way to access maps offline. That’s why our engineering team has been working around the clock to add a "Make this map area available offline" card below the search box for easier access. And, if you still want some #thumbercise, typing “ok maps” will work too!</blockquote>

Wouldn't it have made more sense to include the dedicated card in the first place, instead of just the easter egg, since it had been decided there was demand for the feature? Classic "<a href="http://stopdesign.com/archive/2009/03/20/goodbye-google.html">forty shades of blue</a>" process from Google.]]></description>
<dc:subject>google maps design ux ui</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:6f951f2dd1a9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:maps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://mobileopportunity.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/style-vs-substance-in-mobile-software.html">
    <title>Style v substance in mobile software &gt;&gt; Mobile Opportunity</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-24T21:47:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://mobileopportunity.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/style-vs-substance-in-mobile-software.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Michael Mace has been user testing mobile apps: <blockquote>The most common problem I saw in the tests was users struggling with mobile apps and websites that prioritized beauty over usability. Too often, we as an industry equate an app that looks simple with an app that’s easy to use. Those are two entirely different things. Stripping all the text out of an app and hiding all of the buttons makes for a beautiful demo at TechCrunch, but a horrible user experience for people who are trying to get something done with an app.</blockquote>

There's a free downloadable white paper too (though it demands details like name and email).]]></description>
<dc:subject>mobile ui ux apps</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:026c5c5db717/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:mobile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apps"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://getwired.com/2013/06/12/content-not-the-chrome-apps-not-the-phone/">
    <title>Content, not the chrome. Apps, not the phone. &gt;&gt; getwired.com</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-13T05:50:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://getwired.com/2013/06/12/content-not-the-chrome-apps-not-the-phone/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Wes Miller: <blockquote>Ahead of WWDC 2013, many people were still expecting Apple to add live tiles, and possibly widgets to iOS 7. I didn’t expect either, and as a result wasn’t terribly disappointed to see them not included (that might be an understatement on my part).<p>

At first glance, live tiles may seem like a no-brainer in any operating system. Tiles that provide you information from within an app… How could this go wrong?<p>

Here’s the problems that I have with live tiles in Windows 8, and why I think they wouldn’t make sense on iOS (either):</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>widget ux ui apple</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:4fc6f0421ba9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:widget"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://stratechery.com/2013/change-for-changes-sake/">
    <title>Change for change’s sake &gt;&gt; Stratechery</title>
    <dc:date>2013-05-09T20:39:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://stratechery.com/2013/change-for-changes-sake/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Ben Thompson: <blokquote>The original iPhone included three communications channels: Phone, SMS, and Mail.<p>

My homescreen has 10: Facebook, Twitter, Phone, Skype, Google Voice, WhatsApp, Messages, LINE, Lync, and Mail (and I have other, lesser-used channels on other screens). The vast majority of these channels didn’t exist in 2007, or weren’t widely used. Since then, social interaction has both exploded in use and fragmented in type, but iOS simply wasn’t designed to support multiple channels intelligently.</blockquote>

So a redesign is needed...]]></description>
<dc:subject>ios7 ui ux</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:0318ac65d379/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ios7"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-05-02/sonys-first-mover-disadvantage-in-smart-watches">
    <title>Sony's first-mover disadvantage in smart watches &gt;&gt; Businessweek</title>
    <dc:date>2013-05-03T14:47:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-05-02/sonys-first-mover-disadvantage-in-smart-watches</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Priced at $130, Sony’s 1.3-inch touchscreen watch wirelessly connects to Android (GOOG) smartphones using Bluetooth technology. The gadget alerts users to incoming calls and allows them to reply to e-mails or texts with an array of prewritten messages. It even connects to Facebook (FB) and Twitter and controls a wearer’s phone-based music library. The SmartWatch, about the size of an iPod nano, is a slightly smaller successor to Sony’s LiveView watch.</blockquote>

Gee, it's been out since 2010. Wonder why we aren't all wearing LiveView?

<blockquote>LiveView had more limited features and was hobbled by kinks.<p>

The newer model [released in 2012] is more stylish, but users can’t enter messages and it sometimes requires daily recharging and a stable connection just to tell time reliably. “Sony was ahead of its rivals to release a watch, but it takes more than an idea to create a hit product,” says Mito Securities analyst Keita Wakabayashi. </blockquote>

As the article points out, Sony has had - and missed - plenty of other first-mover advantages.]]></description>
<dc:subject>sony smartwatch ux ui</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:7bbad8a75a53/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:sony"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartwatch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2393269,00.asp">
    <title>The serious flaw with Win 8 and Metro &gt;&gt; John C. Dvorak</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-30T21:59:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2393269,00.asp</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Let me pose a simple question: When you look at your desktop screen, how do you find the program you are looking for? You look for distinctive icons using your human ability to recognize patterns. It’s what we do best. You ignore the words beneath the icon. For example, you scan your desktop for a red flat cat, locate it, and click, knowing the program is Irfanview. We are so good at this that we can identify an upside down icon.<p>
How is it a step forward to create a tile inscribed with the name of the program? An old alphabetized DOS listing is easier to navigate than a wall of tiles, on which nothing is immediately familiar. Our innate pattern recognition is short-circuited by similar tiles. You have to read text rather than react to an iconic image. And while colored tiles help a little, it's still problematic.</blockquote>

For once, Dvorak actually makes a good point - though the tiles also contain icons, but being reversed (white on colour) they're not as easy to recognise as a non-reversed colour. It's the same as trying to read white text on coloured background - it's slower than black on a lighter colour. (Thanks @rquick for the link.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>design ui windows</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:4cd9384ed9ff/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:windows"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://9to5mac.com/2013/04/29/jony-ive-paints-a-fresh-yet-familiar-look-for-ios-7/">
    <title>Jony Ive paints a fresh, yet familiar, look for iOS 7 &gt;&gt; 9to5Mac</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-29T21:33:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://9to5mac.com/2013/04/29/jony-ive-paints-a-fresh-yet-familiar-look-for-ios-7/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>iOS 7 is codenamed “Innsbruck,” according to three people familiar with the OS. The interface changes include an all-new icon set for Apple’s native apps in addition to newly designed tool bars, tab bars, and other fundamental interface features across the system. iOS devices running the next-generation software reportedly have polarizing filters to decrease viewing angles of on-lookers.</blockquote>

The contrast between the old and the new Podcast app - under Forstall, now gone, and under Ive, now in charge - is dramatic. If the redesign follows that, iOS 7 should look good.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple design ios ui ux</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:9ae84116664f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ios"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://techcrunch.com/2013/04/20/cognitive-overhead/">
    <title>Cognitive overhead, or why your product isn’t as simple as you think &gt;&gt; TechCrunch</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-21T21:18:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://techcrunch.com/2013/04/20/cognitive-overhead/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[David Lieb, of the makers of app Bump: <blockquote>To illustrate the difference between generic simplicity and cognitive simplicity, let’s look at a couple products that, on the surface, might be regarded as being simple to use, but rank in my book as some of the most cognitively complex products of late.<p>

QR Codes – Designed to check the simplicity boxes of speed, ubiquity, and small number of steps, QR codes really dropped the ball on cognitive overhead. “So it’s a barcode? No? It’s a website? Ok. But I open websites with my web browser, not my camera. So I take a picture of it? No, I take a picture of it with an app? Which app?”<p>

iCloud / PhotoStream – When we heard Steve Jobs preach the utopian future where all of our photos and data would be seamlessly synchronized among all our devices, we smelled the Apple simplicity we’d all grown to love. But in practice, iCloud is rife with cognitive overhead — it only backs up your most recent photos, it works on certain select apps but not others, you have to create an icloud.com email account for it to sync your mail and notes but not everything else. Oh, and it works on new iPhone and iPads and Macs running OS X v10.7.4 or later, but not your PC or Android tablet. Try explaining that to your mother.</blockquote>

There's quite a long list you could add to that. The "how to do it right" examples are great too.]]></description>
<dc:subject>design cognitive interface ui ux</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:bdc4c6dab78c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:cognitive"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:interface"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://boxesandarrows.com/let-them-pee-avoiding-the-sign-upsign-in-mobile-antipattern/">
    <title>Let them pee: avoiding the sign-up/sign-in mobile antipattern &gt;&gt; Boxes and Arrows</title>
    <dc:date>2013-03-18T18:03:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://boxesandarrows.com/let-them-pee-avoiding-the-sign-upsign-in-mobile-antipattern/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Greg Nudelman: <blockquote>Anything that slows down customers or gets in their way after they download your app is a bad thing. That includes sign-up/sign-in forms that show up even before potential customers can figure out if the app is actually worth using.<p>

This antipattern seems to be going away more and more as companies are beginning to figure out the following simple UX equation:<br />Long sign-up form before you can use the app = Delete app<p>
However, a fair number of apps still force customers to sign up, sign in, or perform some other useless action before they can use the app.</blockquote>

The case study he then cites is priceless.]]></description>
<dc:subject>design ux ui charlesarthur</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:7a5628094b00/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.techradar.com/news/phone-and-communications/mobile-phones/gimmick-watch-which-galaxy-s4-features-are-actually-useful-1137782">
    <title>Gimmick watch: which Galaxy S4 features are actually useful? &gt;&gt; TechRadar</title>
    <dc:date>2013-03-17T21:45:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.techradar.com/news/phone-and-communications/mobile-phones/gimmick-watch-which-galaxy-s4-features-are-actually-useful-1137782</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[By their count, not that many. (Thanks @beardyweirdy666 for the link.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>samsung galaxy ui ux</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:2a4ceae4399e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:galaxy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://martinbelam.com/2013/ultraviolet/">
    <title>Getting ultraviolent about UltraViolet™ &gt;&gt; Martin Belam</title>
    <dc:date>2013-03-07T14:53:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://martinbelam.com/2013/ultraviolet/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[User experience (UX) designer Martin Belam: <blockquote>A good UX can be hard to quantify, but you sure know when you are having a bad one. And over Christmas I stumbled over a really good example of a bad one.<p>

Regular readers may have noticed that I quite like Doctor Who, and so of course Santa brought me the latest DVD box set for Christmas. It includes the new UltraViolet™ feature of making digital copies available to owners of the physical product.<p>

The instructions come in a leaflet in the box, and I was eager to try it out. </blockquote>

Anyone had a <em>good</em> experience with Ultraviolet?]]></description>
<dc:subject>ultraviolet drm films ux ui</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:956b66245f7e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ultraviolet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:drm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:films"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emptystates.tumblr.com/">
    <title>Empty States &gt;&gt; Tumblr</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-18T22:36:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://emptystates.tumblr.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[What does an app show you when it has nothing to show you?]]></description>
<dc:subject>design ui</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:fd9e083992f3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.stephenwolfram.com/2012/12/what-are-you-going-to-do-next-introducing-the-predictive-interface/">
    <title>“What Are You Going to Do Next?” Introducing the Predictive Interface &gt;&gt; Stephen Wolfram log</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-01T22:09:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.stephenwolfram.com/2012/12/what-are-you-going-to-do-next-introducing-the-predictive-interface/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>There aren’t very many qualitatively different types of computer interfaces in use in the world today. But with the release of Mathematica 9 I think we have the first truly practical example of a new kind—the computed predictive interface.</blockquote>

Absorbing blogpost by the hugely clever Stephen Wolfram.]]></description>
<dc:subject>design interface prediction ui</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:18f9823ecd06/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:interface"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:prediction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/windows-8.html">
    <title>Windows 8 — disappointing usability for both novice &amp; power users &gt;&gt; Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox</title>
    <dc:date>2012-11-19T14:38:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.useit.com/alertbox/windows-8.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Jakob Nielsen: <blockquote>One of the most promising design ideas in Windows 8 is the enhanced use of generic commands in the form of the so-called "charms." The charms are a panel of icons that slide in from the screen's right side after a flicking gesture from its right edge (on a tablet) or after pointing the mouse to the screen's upper-right corner (on a computer).<p>
The charms panel includes features like Search, Share (including email), and Settings that apply to whatever content the user is currently viewing. In principle, it's great to have these commands universally available in a single, uniform design that's always accessed the same way.<p>

In practice, the charms work poorly — at least for new users. The old saying, out of sight, out of mind, turned out to be accurate. Because the charms are hidden, our users often forgot to summon them, even when they needed them. In applications such as Epicurious, which included a visible reminder of the search feature, users turned to search much more frequently.<p>

Hiding commands and other GUI chrome makes sense on small mobile phones. It makes less sense on bigger tablet screens. And it makes no sense at all on huge PC screens.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft ui usability ux windows8</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:f7a375857f1b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:usability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:windows8"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://skeu.it/">
    <title>Skeu It!</title>
    <dc:date>2012-11-08T15:49:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://skeu.it/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Skeuomorphism skeuered, hliariously.]]></description>
<dc:subject>design ui ux</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:af54a2c5fb50/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://counternotions.com/2012/11/05/sirjony/">
    <title>Apple’s design problems aren’t skeuomorphic &gt;&gt; counternotions</title>
    <dc:date>2012-11-06T22:06:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://counternotions.com/2012/11/05/sirjony/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>In the end, what’s wrong with iOS isn’t the dark linen behind the app icons at the bottom of the screen, but the fact that iOS ought to have much better inter-application management and navigation than users fiddling with tiny icons. I’m fairly sure most Apple users would gladly continue to use what are supposed to be skeuomorphically challenged Calendar or Notebook apps for another thousand years if Apple could only solve the far more vexing software problems of AppleID unification when using iTunes and App Store, or the performance and reliability of the same. And yet these are the twin sides of the same systems design problem: the display layer surfacing or hiding the power within or, increasingly, lack thereof.</blockquote>

Well said.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple design ios ux ui charlesarthur</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:1157207e7289/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ios"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.uiparade.com/">
    <title>Ui Parade &gt;&gt; User Interface Design Inspiration</title>
    <dc:date>2012-10-29T11:44:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.uiparade.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[UI designer? You'll want this. Even if you aren't, it's a beautiful set of designs to use. (Are any copyrighted? We don't know.) (Thanks @margotlily on Twitter for the link.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>design interface ui</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:0836f50dc7ff/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:interface"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://getwired.com/2012/10/28/ios-is-showing-its-age/">
    <title>iOS is showing its age &gt;&gt; getwired.com</title>
    <dc:date>2012-10-29T11:07:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://getwired.com/2012/10/28/ios-is-showing-its-age/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Wes Miller: <blockquote>iOS should have an option, on by default to update in the background. More importantly, in an ecosystem where too many app authors do the bare minimum in terms of security, apps should have that same option.<p>

The original iPhone succeeded not because of apps. No, it succeeded because it was a better, more usable phone than almost anything else on the market. It just worked. It had voicemails we could see before listening, contacts we could easily edit on the phone, and a Web browser that was better than any mobile browser we’d ever seen before.<p>

But the OS is showing its age. Little nuances like the somewhat functional search screen, Favorites in Contacts, and VIPs in Mail show that iOS is under structural pressure to deal with the volume of data it tries to display in a viable way. Notifications and the Settings app seem fragmented and are starting to become as disorganized as the Windows Control Panel (that’s bad!). Photo Stream sharing is a joke. It’s unusable. The edges are showing.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>ios apple iphone ui ux</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:628e3a657f38/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ios"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://nointerface.tumblr.com/">
    <title>The best interface is No Interface &gt;&gt; Tumblr</title>
    <dc:date>2012-10-28T17:28:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://nointerface.tumblr.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Fascinating blog of "no-interface" products and concepts, such as RFID ski passes. Three simple questions to answer; the design is a lot harder.]]></description>
<dc:subject>interface ui</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:08cf1c8e1318/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:interface"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.currybet.net/cbet_blog/2012/08/never-open-external-links-in-new-windows.php">
    <title>Why your news site should never open external links in a new window &gt;&gt; Martin Belam</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-23T22:06:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.currybet.net/cbet_blog/2012/08/never-open-external-links-in-new-windows.php</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Imagine a not-too-distant world where you are manipulating your device mostly by touch and voice, and the whole document paradigm might have vanished. Operating systems might not have “new windows” in the future, just as browsers didn’t used to have tabs.<p>

Opening up an external link in a new window basically shouts out “Darling, don’t leave me!”, with your site sobbing in the background like a jilted lover.</blockquote>

There are other pertinent accessibility reasons too.]]></description>
<dc:subject>browser ux ui</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:721a42724991/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:browser"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://worrydream.com/ABriefRantOnTheFutureOfInteractionDesign/">
    <title>A brief rant on the future of interaction design &gt;&gt; Bret Victor</title>
    <dc:date>2012-06-21T20:29:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://worrydream.com/ABriefRantOnTheFutureOfInteractionDesign/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[It's all about the hands, but also other things. Read.]]></description>
<dc:subject>ux ui design</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:3004b40b4f37/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:design"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://vimeo.com/43224490">
    <title>Sharp AQUOS Android Smartphone: Feel UX &gt;&gt; Vimeo</title>
    <dc:date>2012-06-20T06:15:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://vimeo.com/43224490</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[An interesting rethink of the Android UI by frog, the designers. Very attractive: note how it's using Microsoft typefaces in the video, and Windows Phone-like tiling. Get used to competition in how Android UIs look as smartphone penetration explodes.]]></description>
<dc:subject>sharp android ui ux</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:8ed166f8ee45/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:sharp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.loper-os.org/?p=861">
    <title>Engelbart’s Violin &gt;&gt; Loper OS</title>
    <dc:date>2012-05-29T05:22:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.loper-os.org/?p=861</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Fascinating as the chorded keyboard is, its confinement to the ghetto of “crackpot technology” is but a symptom of the underlying disease: <a href="http://www.loper-os.org/?p=316">the total victory of the technological business model which caters primarily to the unskilled</a>.</blockquote>

Looking at the intriguing question of why the chorded keyboard never took off as an input mechanism.]]></description>
<dc:subject>interface technology ui ux charlesarthur</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:72b0a61de06c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:interface"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://notes.unwieldy.net/post/22958656041/the-144-146-165-button">
    <title>The $144,146,165 Button &gt;&gt; notes.unwieldy</title>
    <dc:date>2012-05-14T15:50:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://notes.unwieldy.net/post/22958656041/the-144-146-165-button</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Conrolling defaults in user interface design can make people very much more wealthy.]]></description>
<dc:subject>ui user defaults</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:225084d39c2d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:user"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:defaults"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeeOkHjV7nM">
    <title>Joe Pirillo uses Mac OS X for the first time &gt;&gt; YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2012-03-15T06:45:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeeOkHjV7nM</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Yesterday we <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2012/mar/14/windows-8-user-interface-confusion">showed you Chris Pirillo's father using Windows 8 for the first time</a>. Now here he is using Mac OSX for the first time, and trying to find "the internet". 

Fascinating piece of user interface film: watch this before you judge users. (Pirillo senior is a confirmed Windows user, though he has used iPads and iPhones.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple userinterface ux ui osx</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:02b07037d6c6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:userinterface"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:osx"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/03/03/andrew_does_windows8/">
    <title>Metro breakdown! Windows 8 UI is little gain for lots of pain • The Register</title>
    <dc:date>2012-03-05T22:37:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/03/03/andrew_does_windows8/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Andrew Orlowski: <blockquote>Metro is a user interface designed for smartphones, which I have praised generously, and which looks good and works well on small devices. It may yet mature into something equally attractive and useful on iPad-like tablets. But welded onto a non-touch laptop or desktop PC, it represents a huge negative for the majority of Windows users.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>interface microsoft ui windows metro</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:9750a2f117a4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:interface"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:windows"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:metro"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2012/01/microsoft-bets-kinect-windows/2/">
    <title>Microsoft Bets Big on Kinect for Windows, But Splits Its Community | Epicenter | Wired.com</title>
    <dc:date>2012-01-13T00:39:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2012/01/microsoft-bets-kinect-windows/2/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Ballmer never thought he’d be in this position — not only porting a gaming peripheral to his beloved Windows machines, or even opening it up for commercial development by other software companies, but owning it, taking control of it, and positioning it as a key component in the future of the company.

Considering that a little over a year ago, Microsoft was threatening to sue and/or prosecute anyone who wanted to develop for Kinect on a PC, it’s a remarkable turnaround.]]></description>
<dc:subject>windows kinect gesture ui ces2012</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:0cb1be83d9e4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:windows"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:kinect"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:gesture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ces2012"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://icspapercuts.tumblr.com/">
    <title>ICS Paper Cuts &gt;&gt; Tumblr</title>
    <dc:date>2011-12-22T23:02:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://icspapercuts.tumblr.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A Tumblr looking at UI inconsistencies or weirdnesses in Ice Cream Sandwich (aka Android 4.0). If you're presently on Android 2.x, you'll probably find ICS like moving into a new house where all the rooms have been rearranged. So, is there a similar Tumblr for iOS?]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlesarthur ics android ui ux</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:5964577bfd2a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.elezea.com/2011/12/google-path-ui-design/">
    <title>Google Circles and Path 2.0: How good UI design cannot fix a broken solution</title>
    <dc:date>2011-12-21T22:42:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.elezea.com/2011/12/google-path-ui-design/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["There are inherent problems with binary social networks. The idea that someone is either full-on in your life (and therefore has access to everything about you) or not at all is not how it works offline. You tend to share certain information only with certain groups of people. Only some people will be interested in photos of your new puppy, whereas those same people will probably not be interested in blog posts about your work.

Google Circles aims to solve these problems by allowing you to drag and drop people into distinct buckets, and letting you only share what you want with each circle. And yes, the UI makes it really easy to do this. It’s great design."

But it's impossible for that great design to make up for the fact that you can't maintain the listing of who belongs in which circles (or overlapping circles) for any length of time.]]></description>
<dc:subject>google+ design twitter ui ux</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:8caed0e55d3c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:google+"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.flickr.com/photos/codepo8/6100466417/">
    <title>Object moved - the beauty of Ryanair usability &gt;&gt; codepo8 on Flickr</title>
    <dc:date>2011-08-31T22:00:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.flickr.com/photos/codepo8/6100466417/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Truly, a website design that sticks two fingers up at you from its lair in the mid-90s.]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlesarthur ui</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:e79370ae842b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.winsupersite.com/article/windows8/vx4b2z-140385">
    <title>What ELSE Microsoft Revealed About Explorer In Windows 8 &gt;&gt; WinSuperSite</title>
    <dc:date>2011-08-31T21:21:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.winsupersite.com/article/windows8/vx4b2z-140385</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Paul Thurrott, whom nobody would describe as an Apple fan, isn't very keen on the new Windows 8 Explorer ribbon idea: "The Microsoft post describing the new ribbon UI goes into great detail about telemetry data, which provides the company with information about what users are really using in Explorer and elsewhere in Windows. And according to that data, the top 10 commands represent over 81% of all commands used in Explorer. The bottom 18% of commands (by usage) include such things as Open, Edit (Menu), View Toggle, Organize, New Folder, Send To, and Edit. <br />
<br />
"And yet, looking at a Microsoft screenshot of the new ribbon, what do I see in the default first tab? A bunch of commands - including Open and Edit, by the way - that are not in the 81% most-frequently used commands." Huh?"<br />
<br />
He also described Apple's Finder as "much cleaner and less busy". That's really quite scary.]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlesarthur microsoft ui</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:a32c0f8288d0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2011/07/google-tests-interface-optimized-for.html">
    <title>Google tests an interface optimized for infinite scrolling &gt;&gt; Unofficial Google Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-20T20:32:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2011/07/google-tests-interface-optimized-for.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Alon Laudon spotted a new experimental interface for Google's results pages. The most important change is that most navigation elements continue to be visible even when you scroll down. The navigation bar, the search box and the search options sidebar have a fixed position, which means that you no longer have scroll to the top of the page to edit the query or switch to a specialized search engine."<br />
<br />
Is it bad that a first reaction was "I wonder when that was patented?"]]></description>
<dc:subject>google search charlesarthur ui ux</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:1e26dca5c9ba/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:search"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.zdnet.co.uk/blogs/mixed-signals-10000051/apple-lion-a-roar-deal-for-the-pc-10023524/">
    <title>Apple Lion - a roar deal for the PC &gt;&gt; ZDNet UK</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-20T16:54:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.zdnet.co.uk/blogs/mixed-signals-10000051/apple-lion-a-roar-deal-for-the-pc-10023524/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Apple's Lion is perhaps the real beginning of the end for PCs, in the sense of a computer that rudely, personally, puts its demands ahead of ours. Scroll bars? They're not natural and have no counterpart in the real world. We normally just touch a document directly and move it around with our fingers — a tablet way of working that seems more natural and is now part of Lion. There's still that mouse or touchpad - working with large vertical screen needs compromises ‐ but the interface is one that can start to work when there's nothing but a display of some sort. When the computer itself, in other words, has gone away. <br />
"Combine that sort of move with, say, projectors built into walls and the sort of optics that let them throw an legible image anywhere; motion sensors that know where fingers and hands are; a connection into the cloud; documents you never need to explicitly save because they're just there, always... where, in this picture, is the PC?"]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlesarthur apple lion ui</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:b28689635db4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:lion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://techcrunch.com/2011/06/03/windows-ate-the-mouse/">
    <title>Still think the mouse isn’t dead? &gt;&gt; Techcrunch</title>
    <dc:date>2011-06-07T05:25:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://techcrunch.com/2011/06/03/windows-ate-the-mouse/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I mean, does anyone still think the mouse isn’t dead?<br />
"I can understand that after Apple put a gun to the head of the mouse with the release of the Magic Trackpad, people were skeptical. 'Apple has basically no market share!' was the basis of most of the basic arguments. The bigger point was that we’re moving into a world where touch is king, lead by the smartphones and tablets. These devices are going to start influencing our more traditional computers, not the other way around.<br />
"But still, many were quick to argue that the PC will never go mouse-less. Which is silly. In fact, it’s going to next year. And Microsoft — yes, Microsoft! — is leading that charge."]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlesarthur microsoft usability ui</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:d4330a8fba13/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:usability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://twitpic.com/52u1a7">
    <title>This is a first-launch experience of a popular highly-rated camera app &gt;&gt; Twitpic</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-26T23:03:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://twitpic.com/52u1a7</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A 52-word three-sentence "tip" where if everything's going well, you answer "No".]]></description>
<dc:subject>android ui</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:c1d0ce740c81/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>