<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (guardiantech)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from guardiantech</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.twitter.com/2012/07/our-approach-to-trust-safety-and.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000937.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://blog.twitter.com/2012/07/our-approach-to-trust-safety-and.html">
    <title>Our approach to Trust &amp; Safety and private information &gt;&gt; Twitter Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-01T05:19:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.twitter.com/2012/07/our-approach-to-trust-safety-and.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A big moment for Twitter: That said, we want to apologize for the part of this story that we did mess up. The team working closely with NBC around our Olympics partnership did proactively identify a Tweet that was in violation of the Twitter Rules and encouraged them to file a support ticket with our Trust and Safety team to report the violation, as has now been reported publicly. Our Trust and Safety team did not know that part of the story and acted on the report as they would any other.

As I stated earlier, we do not proactively report or remove content on behalf of other users no matter who they are. This behavior is not acceptable and undermines the trust our users have in us. We should not and cannot be in the business of proactively monitoring and flagging content, no matter who the user is — whether a business partner, celebrity or friend. As of earlier today, the account has been unsuspended, and we will actively work to ensure this does not happen again.]]></description>
<dc:subject>twitter trust joshhalliday</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:a38e35781eb4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:trust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:joshhalliday"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000937.html">
    <title>Google, Safari, and a clamour of cookie confusion &gt;&gt; Lauren Weinstein</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-18T22:42:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000937.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Weinstein feels everyone has gotten too het up: <blockquote>My gut feeling is that we've passed beyond the era where it made sense to concentrate on Internet privacy controls and issues mainly in terms of specific technologies as we've done in the past.

As noted above, cookies are neither good nor bad, neither intrinsically righteous nor evil. Cookies, like the other local storage mechanisms that have now been implemented, are merely tools. And as with other tools, how they are used is under the control of the entities who deploy these complex functionalities…What we really need to be concentrating on are the fundamental issues of trust and transparency.

If we as users feel confident that individual firms are doing their best to be transparent about their policies and are handling our data in responsible manners, then putting our trust (and data) in the hands of those firms is a solid bet.</blockquote>

Reasonable, and with useful links. But it then throws the question of who you trust off to a hazy "branding" issue. Is that really helpful?]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlesarthur google cookiegate privacy trust</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:c659e4004ca3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:cookiegate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:trust"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>