<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (guardiantech)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from guardiantech</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://seattletimes.com/html/businesstechnology/2023272500_boeing777sfcrashxml.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/replicant-developers-find-and-close-samsung-galaxy-backdoor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.getpebble.com/2014/02/11/an-update-on-android/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-10-16/open-source-everything-the-moral-of-the-healthcare-dot-gov-debacle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.humblebundle.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.geekwire.com/2013/american-life-intellectual-ventures-90-backend-cut-selling-patent/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.leancrew.com/all-this/2013/04/quarterly-quiverings/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sonymobile.com/global-en/software/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://allthingsd.com/20130321/a-universal-remote-thats-a-touch-too-much/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jury.me/blog/2013/3/14/the-human-impact-of-bugs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://shkspr.mobi/blog/2013/02/galaxy-note-2-copy-bug-update/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.noteflight.com/login"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.istartedsomething.com/20130115/y-combinator-is-funding-the-future-of-spam-in-windows-drive-by-crapware-installers/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/11/your-criticisms-are-completely-wrong-stallman-on-software-patents/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wired.com/opinion/2012/10/mark-lemley-functional-claiming/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wired.com/opinion/2012/11/with-all-due-respect-the-patent-system-is-not-broken/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.quora.com/Software-Engineering/What-are-the-best-examples-of-software-bugs-that-became-features/answer/Harvey-Green"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/10/federal-circuit-take-on-software-patent"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.infoworld.com/d/open-source-software/the-software-patent-solution-has-been-right-here-all-along-202299?page=0,0#disqus_thread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tasker.dinglisch.net/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/21/3257406/windows-8-pro-price-upgrade-price"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ifixit.org/3001/how-one-teacher-built-a-computer-lab-for-free/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sprw.me/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/07/13/a-show-and-tell-with-googles-hardware/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cocoanetics.com/2012/06/forbidden-fruits/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/bott/if-vlc-can-ship-a-free-dvd-player-why-cant-microsoft/4962"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://9to5mac.com/2012/03/21/new-ipad-wi-fi-issues-seem-to-be-software-related-should-be-easy-to-patch/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/03/19/duqu_trojan_mystery/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.darkreading.com/vulnerability-management/167901026/security/vulnerabilities/232600860/nearly-80-of-all-bugs-are-in-third-party-apps.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/09/the_9x_email_problem/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/software/3334812/some-1073-users-encounter-nasty-bug-fix-available/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/02/02/windows_phone_get_going/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/12/20/bug_cause_aussie_a330_plunge/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sciencecodemanifesto.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://stallman.org/archives/2011-jul-oct.html#06_October_2011_(Steve_Jobs)"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://twitter.com/#!/dickc/status/97686216681594880"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2011/09/14/do-users-change-their-settings/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2011/05/the-infinite-version.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.zdnet.co.uk/blogs/mixed-signals-10000051/bsa-secret-agenda-open-source-saves-the-world-10024295/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://stephentrainor.com/tools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/MouthWideShut.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/onepercent/2011/08/financial-reporters-threatened.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scribd.com/doc/60107952/11-03-30-Kootol-Notice-of-Allowance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reddit.com/comments/ir6zc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://furbo.org/2011/07/13/the-rise-and-fall-of-the-independent-developer/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.tuaw.com/2011/07/08/interview-growls-project-lead-on-coming-to-the-mac-app-store/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.slate.com/id/2295816/pagenum/all/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/bott/an-applecare-support-rep-talks-mac-malware-is-getting-worse/3342"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://money.cnn.com/2011/05/09/technology/google_gadgets/"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://seattletimes.com/html/businesstechnology/2023272500_boeing777sfcrashxml.html">
    <title>Boeing blames pilots for Asiana 777 crash; airline faults software, too &gt;&gt; The Seattle Times</title>
    <dc:date>2014-04-01T12:10:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://seattletimes.com/html/businesstechnology/2023272500_boeing777sfcrashxml.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Recall the accident in July 2013 when three people died as a plane crashed on landing? <blockquote>The South Korean carrier wrote that “the probable cause of this accident was the flight crew’s failure to monitor and maintain a minimum safe airspeed during a final approach.”<p>

However, its report cites factors it says contributed to the crash, including the logic built into the plane’s autothrottle software.<p>

Boeing and Asiana agree that as the pilots came in to land, they expected the autothrottle to automatically supply engine thrust to maintain a minimum airspeed. In fact, in the flight mode they had engaged, the onus was on them to maintain the speed.<p>

Asiana also faulted the cockpit alerting systems as providing “inadequate warning” that the speed had dropped dangerously low.<p>

The discrepancy between the airline and the jet-maker pivots around Boeing’s flight-control design philosophy, cited in its submission as requiring “the pilot always has the final authority over any automation system.”</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>software airline crash</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:4b6be42be043/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:airline"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:crash"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/replicant-developers-find-and-close-samsung-galaxy-backdoor">
    <title>Replicant developers find and close Samsung Galaxy backdoor &gt;&gt; Free Software Foundation</title>
    <dc:date>2014-03-13T11:51:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/replicant-developers-find-and-close-samsung-galaxy-backdoor</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>While working on Replicant, a fully free/libre version of Android, we discovered that the proprietary program running on the applications processor in charge of handling the communication protocol with the modem actually implements a backdoor that lets the modem perform remote file I/O operations on the file system. This program is shipped with the Samsung Galaxy devices and makes it possible for the modem to read, write, and delete files on the phone's storage. On several phone models, this program runs with sufficient rights to access and modify the user's personal data. A technical description of the issue, as well as the list of known affected devices is <a href="http://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/SamsungGalaxyBackdoor">available at the Replicant wiki</a>.<p>

Provided that the modem runs proprietary software and can be remotely controlled, that backdoor provides remote access to the phone's data, even in the case where the modem is isolated and cannot access the storage directly. This is yet another example of what unacceptable behaviour proprietary software permits!</blockquote>

Affected devices: Nexus S, Galaxy Note 1+2, Galaxy S, S2, S3, and more. But there's a very big proviso encapsulated in that "provided". The NSA or GCHQ might be able to. Others? Likely not.<p>

The idea of a "fully free/libre version of Android" seems a trifle redundant, though.]]></description>
<dc:subject>samsung software backdoor</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:7685cde327ed/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:backdoor"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.getpebble.com/2014/02/11/an-update-on-android/">
    <title>An update on Android &gt;&gt; Pebble</title>
    <dc:date>2014-02-13T07:25:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.getpebble.com/2014/02/11/an-update-on-android/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Kean Wong is in charge of the software engineering group at Pebble (the smartwatch people), and is explaining why the iOS version of the 2.0 software is already released, and the Android one isn't: <blockquote>The Pebble Android app uses Bluetooth heavily, includes a Javascript runtime environment, accesses the internet and talks to the Pebble without interrupting the user experience, integrates with the Pebble appstore, works on a myriad of (over 1,000) different Android devices, runs on 27 different versions and flavours of Android 4.x, and must continue to run in the background even if other apps in the system use up all the memory, or the Android device powers down or resets. All of this has to work elegantly and reliably for many thousands of Pebble Android users.<p>

The reason why the Android version of the 2.0 Pebble app has lagged the iOS version is fundamentally pretty simple – it has purely been a matter of resources.</blockquote>

A thousand devices and 27 different flavours of Android 4.x. The latter reaches the same proportion of Android users as iOS 7 (78%) - which has eight versions at most (iOS 7.0.0 - 7.0.4, phone and tablet) and perhaps 12 devices (iPhone 4, 4S, 5, 5C, 5S, iPad 2, 3, 4, Air, mini, retina mini). ]]></description>
<dc:subject>pebble software bluetooth</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:f1f6c09b9a47/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:pebble"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:bluetooth"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-10-16/open-source-everything-the-moral-of-the-healthcare-dot-gov-debacle">
    <title>Open-source everything: the moral of the Healthcare.gov debacle &gt;&gt; Businessweek</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-16T16:18:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-10-16/open-source-everything-the-moral-of-the-healthcare-dot-gov-debacle</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Paul Ford: <blockquote>Put charitably, the rollout of healthcare.gov has been a mess. Millward Brown Digital, a consulting firm, reports that a mere 1% of the 3.7 million people who tried to register on the federal exchange in the first week actually managed to enroll. Even if the problems are fixed, the debacle makes clear that it’s time for the government to change the way it ships code — namely, by embracing the approach to software development that has revolutionized the technology industry.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>software opensource</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:248529e1145b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:opensource"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.humblebundle.com/">
    <title>The Humble Bundle with Android 6</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-19T04:43:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.humblebundle.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The latest games bundle for Android devices:

<blockquote>Pay what you want for the underwater fantasy action-adventure game Aquaria; the chromatic minimalist puzzler Fractal: Make Blooms Not War; the retro zombie survival game Organ Trail: Director’s Cut; and the nail-biting stealth strategy platformer Stealth Bastard Deluxe. You’ll also receive a bonus game: the rhythmic audio-visual game Pulse: Volume One. If you pay more than the average, you’ll also get the intense tactical combat sim Frozen Synapse and the classic mystery point-and-click adventure Broken Sword: Shadow of the Templars - Director’s Cut!</blockquote>

Many games developers criticise Android for its users' perceived unwillingness to pay for content. Yet with 13 days to go, more than 68k people have stumped up just under $320k for the latest Humble Bundle. There's life beyond the Google Play store...]]></description>
<dc:subject>android games humblebundle software</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:8e3e1477cfd3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:games"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:humblebundle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.geekwire.com/2013/american-life-intellectual-ventures-90-backend-cut-selling-patent/">
    <title>This American Life: Intellectual Ventures got 90% of ongoing profits even after selling patent &gt;&gt; GeekWire</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-03T05:36:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.geekwire.com/2013/american-life-intellectual-ventures-90-backend-cut-selling-patent/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Intellectual Ventures struck a deal to receive 90% of the ongoing profits from a patent that it sold to a mysterious company called Oasis Research — which then used the patent to sue 16 tech companies, reaching large settlements with many of them.<p>

That’s according to a follow-up piece airing this weekend on This American Life, the public radio program that first dug into Intellectual Ventures’ dealings as part of a larger exploration of the patent system in 2011. The size of that “back-end” cut is one of the revelations in the new piece.</blockquote>

The patent in question was used to in a lawsuit against 16 companies. Intellectual Ventures is the company run by ex-Microsoftie Nathan Myhrvold. There have long been suspicions that it's behind, and benefits from, lawsuits by small "non-practising entities" - aka patent trolls. This is the first time this has been confirmed.

And when one targeted company finally took the case all the way to a jury trial, the patent was found invalid. But that didn't help companies which had already signed up to pay in earlier settlements.]]></description>
<dc:subject>patents software</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:6c03b178c479/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.leancrew.com/all-this/2013/04/quarterly-quiverings/">
    <title>Quarterly quiverings &gt;&gt; All this</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-24T19:55:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.leancrew.com/all-this/2013/04/quarterly-quiverings/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Doctor Drang": <blockquote>I don’t use a Mac or an iPhone because of Apple’s balance sheet. I use them because they (usually) work for me, and I save my anger and frustration for when they don’t. I’m far more affected by an iCloud screwup than by the iPhone’s market share, by Lion’s removal of Save As… than by Apple’s stock price, and by Preview’s lack of AppleScript support than by anything Rob Enderle says.</blockquote>

Applescript for Preview would be awesome.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple economics software</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:8b69ae4c9106/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sonymobile.com/global-en/software/">
    <title>Software &gt;&gt; Sony Smartphones (Global UK English)</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-01T21:38:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.sonymobile.com/global-en/software/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Optimal performance, new features, bug fixes and more – with our software updates, you make sure your phone stays at its best. Keep your phone up to date and enjoy all the benefits of the latest software version.</blockquote>

To make this happen, you have to locate your phone, then run a Java applet (Java?) on the browser, and then download a Windows program. The smartphone as PC.]]></description>
<dc:subject>sony software</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:b5ed7d2c24c8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:sony"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://allthingsd.com/20130321/a-universal-remote-thats-a-touch-too-much/">
    <title>Logitech Harmony Touch Review &gt;&gt; AllThingsD</title>
    <dc:date>2013-03-21T16:01:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://allthingsd.com/20130321/a-universal-remote-thats-a-touch-too-much/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Bonnie Cha: <blockquote>I’ve been using the Harmony Touch for the past week, and there’s a lot to like about the remote. Setup is easy. The touchscreen provides one-touch access to 50 of your favorite channels, and you can use gestures to perform various tasks. That said, it also poses some problems.<p>
Due to the location of the remote’s 2.4in display, some key buttons are placed out of easy reach. Those who like physical buttons might also take issue with the remote’s reliance on the touchscreen for things like entering channel numbers.<p>
But the biggest hurdle may be its expensive $250 price tag. At this point, the touchscreen is a nice-to-have feature, not a must-have, so it’s not worth the extra cost.</blockquote>

If you ever needed proof of the ocean between hardware companies - which solve problems by adding more buttons (or touch screens) - and software companies, which solve problems by repurposing features and adapting to the user, here it is.

Also: <em>$250??</em>]]></description>
<dc:subject>hardware software ux</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:6dff9eaba06f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:hardware"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jury.me/blog/2013/3/14/the-human-impact-of-bugs">
    <title>The Human impact of bugs &gt;&gt; Jury.me</title>
    <dc:date>2013-03-15T15:06:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://jury.me/blog/2013/3/14/the-human-impact-of-bugs</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A three-act play with software. Starts out very sad. Improves. Morality lesson in the middle/end.]]></description>
<dc:subject>bugs software</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:0749a2cfde45/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:bugs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://shkspr.mobi/blog/2013/02/galaxy-note-2-copy-bug-update/">
    <title>Galaxy Note 2 – copy bug update &gt;&gt; Terence Eden</title>
    <dc:date>2013-02-28T07:12:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://shkspr.mobi/blog/2013/02/galaxy-note-2-copy-bug-update/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Last week <a href="http://shkspr.mobi/blog/2013/02/samsung-copy-paste-bug-aka-never-buy-samsung-galaxy-phones/">I blogged about a pretty severe flaw in some of Samsung's phones</a>. If you use copy &#038; paste too many times - the phone reboots or resets.<p>So, I ranted and raved on my blog and <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2013/feb/21/samsung-copying-bug-android-devices-criticism">in the press</a>. Samsung wouldn't respond to me - either through customer support or through their PR team. Nice way to treat a paying customer, guys!<p>There is an OTA update for the Galaxy Note II - taking it to 4.1.2. Sadly this isn't yet being pushed out via all UK carriers (including O2, who I work for).<p>As far as I can tell, the update <em>does</em> fix the bug. I've only been trying it for an hour - but it seems that copying no longer crashes the device.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>samsung software copypaste</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:e8e9eb05e2a8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:copypaste"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.noteflight.com/login">
    <title>Online Music Notation Software &gt;&gt; Noteflight</title>
    <dc:date>2013-02-01T06:39:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.noteflight.com/login</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Noteflight® is an online music writing application that lets you create, view, print and hear music notation with professional quality, right in your web browser. Write music on your computer, tablet or smartphone, share with other users, or embed in your own pages.</blockquote>

Inevitable, certainly. Necessary?]]></description>
<dc:subject>music online software</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:71dc10af20a7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:music"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.istartedsomething.com/20130115/y-combinator-is-funding-the-future-of-spam-in-windows-drive-by-crapware-installers/">
    <title>Y Combinator is funding the future of spam in Windows – drive-by crapware installers &gt;&gt; istartedsomething</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-15T23:14:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.istartedsomething.com/20130115/y-combinator-is-funding-the-future-of-spam-in-windows-drive-by-crapware-installers/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Long Zheng explains how all that crap gets onto your computer: VC funding.]]></description>
<dc:subject>business malware software windows</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:b4a283933672/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:malware"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:windows"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/11/your-criticisms-are-completely-wrong-stallman-on-software-patents/">
    <title>“Your criticisms are completely wrong”: Stallman on software patents, 20 years in &gt;&gt; Ars Technica</title>
    <dc:date>2012-11-22T21:44:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/11/your-criticisms-are-completely-wrong-stallman-on-software-patents/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>[Professor John] Duffy [of the University of Virginia] raised the specter that some things might not be invented at all without patents, in software and other fields. "The only thing worse than a patented technology that burdens the public is not having a technology at all," he said. Sure, some software patents were a pain, but others were protecting important work. "The question is, will you get very serious research that is patent-motivated? Speech recognition, for example, is very patent-intensive."<p>

In Stallman's view, the idea that society might be able to eliminate "bad patents" while keeping good ones is a kind of Jedi mind trick. Offering patents as a reward for software development—a system where the prize is a right to shut down someone else—is fatally flawed.<p>

"Consider the MP3 patent," said Stallman. "That caused a lot of harm. It's not trivial, it came from a research institute. But we can fund research institutes in other ways."</blockquote>

(Thanks @doarunner for the link.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>law patent software stallman</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:ccff75e194fe/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:patent"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:stallman"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wired.com/opinion/2012/10/mark-lemley-functional-claiming/">
    <title>Let's go back to patenting the &quot;solution&quot;, not the &quot;problem&quot; &gt;&gt; Wired.com</title>
    <dc:date>2012-11-12T15:59:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wired.com/opinion/2012/10/mark-lemley-functional-claiming/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Mark Lemley, Stanford professor and partner at Durie Tangri LLP: <blockquote>…broad functional claiming is back. This is partly because of the way the means-plus-function claim rules have been interpreted by the Federal Circuit. Patentees have been able to write broad functional claims without being subject to the limitations of section 112(f).<p>

But it’s also because of the nature of computer programming.<p>

Functional claiming of software inventions is arguably responsible for most of the well-recognized problems with software patents today. Software patentees have increasingly been claiming to own the function of their program itself – not merely the particular way they achieved that goal.</blockquote>

His argument would be really powerful if he were to cite an example, but he doesn't. (Thanks @hotsoup for the link.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>software patents</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:eca00d40a1bb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wired.com/opinion/2012/11/with-all-due-respect-the-patent-system-is-not-broken/">
    <title>With All Due Respect: The Patent System's Not Broken &gt;&gt; Wired Opinion | Wired.com</title>
    <dc:date>2012-11-11T15:07:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wired.com/opinion/2012/11/with-all-due-respect-the-patent-system-is-not-broken/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Why would a company spend billions of dollars to build a microprocessor-manufacturing plant employing thousands of skilled workers in the US, if it could only protect its technology by obtaining patents in other countries? Why would a venture capital firm fund a social-networking service provider if the company could not obtain patents on its innovative software backbone, preventing others from easily copying it?</blockquote>

Not mentioned, but maybe worth recalling: Google has an exclusive licence to the PageRank patent from Stanford University. (The exclusivity was meant to expire in 2011 but a call to Stanford shows it hasn't..)

The writer is a patent attorney at IBM. Which means many people will dismiss what he's saying out of hand.]]></description>
<dc:subject>software patents ibm</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:05ec773cc659/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ibm"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.quora.com/Software-Engineering/What-are-the-best-examples-of-software-bugs-that-became-features/answer/Harvey-Green">
    <title>What are the best examples of software bugs that became features? &gt;&gt; Quora</title>
    <dc:date>2012-10-24T20:32:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.quora.com/Software-Engineering/What-are-the-best-examples-of-software-bugs-that-became-features/answer/Harvey-Green</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>This is from an anecdote by Ken Demarest, one of the original developers who worked on Wing Commander I on the PC...<p>

... we were getting an exception from our EMM386 memory manager when we exited the game. We'd clear the screen and a single line would print out, something like "EMM386 Memory manager error. Blah blah blah." We had to ship ASAP. So I hex edited the error in the memory manager itself to read "Thank you for playing Wing Commander!"</blockquote>

Actually, the <a href="http://www.quora.com/Software-Engineering/What-are-the-best-examples-of-software-bugs-that-became-features">whole thread</a> is worth reading, starting with Space Invaders.]]></description>
<dc:subject>software coding</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:d267120cbe77/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:coding"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/10/federal-circuit-take-on-software-patent">
    <title>The Federal Circuit to take on software patents ... again &gt;&gt; Electronic Frontier Foundation</title>
    <dc:date>2012-10-16T07:16:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/10/federal-circuit-take-on-software-patent</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>In a welcome move, the full Federal Circuit <a href="https://www.eff.org/sites/default/files/CLS_rehearing_order.pdf">has agreed to revisit</a> a troubling ruling in a case called <em>CLS Bank v. Alice Corp</em>. This case, along with the <a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/03/eff-urges-supreme-court-take-stand"><em>Ultramercial</em> case</a>, presents an important opportunity for the courts to insert some long-overdue sanity into the debate over what can and cannot be patented. In light of the Supreme Court's ruling earlier this year in <em><a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/03/supreme-court-gets-it-right-no-patents-laws-nature">Mayo</a>, </em>we think the Federal Circuit has little choice but to throw out the dangerous patents in both <em>CLS Bank</em> and <em>Ultramercial</em> and make clear once and for all that ideas that are otherwise abstract cannot be patented simply because they are executed on the Internet or in a computer system.</blockquote>

Don't get your hopes up that this will kill software patents. The argument here is about "obviousness", not whether you can patent software implementations in the US. (Thanks @pedgington for the link.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>patents software</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:56e8ccb9fc91/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.infoworld.com/d/open-source-software/the-software-patent-solution-has-been-right-here-all-along-202299?page=0,0#disqus_thread">
    <title>The software patent solution has been right here all along &gt;&gt; InfoWorld</title>
    <dc:date>2012-09-17T20:53:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.infoworld.com/d/open-source-software/the-software-patent-solution-has-been-right-here-all-along-202299?page=0,0#disqus_thread</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[There's no simple excerpt, so you'll have to read it really. (Thanks @sputnikkers for the link.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>patents software</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:d8e846fc98dd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tasker.dinglisch.net/">
    <title>Tasker for Android &gt;&gt; Dinglisch.net</title>
    <dc:date>2012-09-11T22:07:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tasker.dinglisch.net/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Some people on the "things I'd like to see in iOS" hadn't heard of Android's Tasker, which lets you tie together strings of actions using Android's intents. Presented here as a public service. (Android users only, obviously.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>android apps software</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:1a2836cce4e8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/21/3257406/windows-8-pro-price-upgrade-price">
    <title>Windows 8 Pro to be priced at $199 following $69.99 promotional pricing &gt;&gt; The Verge</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-21T12:32:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/21/3257406/windows-8-pro-price-upgrade-price</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Microsoft's Windows 8 Pro software will be priced at $199 after a promotional price of $69.99 expires on January 31st 2013, according to one source familiar with Microsoft's plans. The software maker will also offer a Windows 8 to Windows 8 Pro upgrade option at retail stores for $69.99 until January 31st when the price reverts to $99.99.</blockquote>

It's a big upgrade, but in these days of apps that feels pricey.]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft windows software</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:27d9354db0dd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:windows"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ifixit.org/3001/how-one-teacher-built-a-computer-lab-for-free/">
    <title>How one teacher built a computer lab for free &gt;&gt; iFixit</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-14T12:26:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://ifixit.org/3001/how-one-teacher-built-a-computer-lab-for-free/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Robert teaches at ASCEND, a small arts K-8 school in the Alameda County School District. He’s a fan of technology and believes that it’s an important part of K-12 education. Yet ASCEND had no computer lab and no computers in classrooms. So in 2007, Robert acquired 18 donated computers. But these computers were less help than he’d anticipated. The operating systems were slow. Some computers had viruses or malware. Students became frustrated.<p>

Most of the computers’ problems could be fixed by wiping the disks and reinstalling the operating system—but buying new software for every donated computer would be prohibitively expensive. </blockquote>

You've probably guessed what happened next.]]></description>
<dc:subject>linux software opensource</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:6d54835bedef/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:linux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:opensource"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://sprw.me/">
    <title>Our news &gt;&gt; Sparrow</title>
    <dc:date>2012-07-21T15:57:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://sprw.me/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>We're excited to announce that Sparrow has been acquired by Google!<p>

We care a lot about how people communicate, and we did our best to provide you with the most intuitive and pleasurable mailing experience.<p>
Now we're joining the Gmail team to accomplish a bigger vision — one that we think we can better achieve with Google.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>sparrow acquisitions software google</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:7232f1431db8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:sparrow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:acquisitions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:google"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/07/13/a-show-and-tell-with-googles-hardware/">
    <title>A show-and-tell with Google's hardware &gt;&gt; NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2012-07-15T21:35:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/07/13/a-show-and-tell-with-googles-hardware/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>While Mr. Schmidt acknowledged that Google purchased the company and its patents, in part, as a reaction to rival “Apple’s behavior,” he said its hardware business was a real draw. Mr. Schmidt was tight-lipped about Google’s plans for Motorola but he promised that a new batch of products were nearly ready for prime time.<p>

“We always wanted to be in the hardware business,” he said. “Larry and Sergey have always wanted to do hardware in one form or another. This was a way to get into it quickly.”</blockquote>

If anyone can find a quote from any of Schmidt, Page or Brin from any period before 2012 in which they have indicated that they want to get into the hardware business, please point us to it. (Note: "Android" isn't the hardware business. It was always software, and intended to be software.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>google software hardware</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:34b1dcb596da/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:hardware"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.cocoanetics.com/2012/06/forbidden-fruits/">
    <title>Forbidden Fruits &gt;&gt; Cocoanetics</title>
    <dc:date>2012-06-22T14:05:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.cocoanetics.com/2012/06/forbidden-fruits/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Strong arguments about why if you're looking to file patents on software (and rational companies in the US do) you'd want to keep any demonstrations under non-disclosure agreements.]]></description>
<dc:subject>software patents apple ios</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:d1ab02051059/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ios"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/bott/if-vlc-can-ship-a-free-dvd-player-why-cant-microsoft/4962">
    <title>If VLC can ship a free DVD player, why can't Microsoft? &gt;&gt; ZDNet</title>
    <dc:date>2012-05-07T21:29:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.zdnet.com/blog/bott/if-vlc-can-ship-a-free-dvd-player-why-cant-microsoft/4962</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Ed Bott untangles this puzzler. Short answer: because of software patents in the US. See also <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/b8/archive/2012/05/04/q-amp-a-dvd-playback-and-windows-media-center-in-windows-8.aspx">Microsoft's FAQ on the costs involved</a>.]]></description>
<dc:subject>software patents licensing</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:ea1212cf43a9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:licensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://9to5mac.com/2012/03/21/new-ipad-wi-fi-issues-seem-to-be-software-related-should-be-easy-to-patch/">
    <title>New iPad Wi-Fi issues seem to be software related, should be easy to patch &gt;&gt; 9to5Mac</title>
    <dc:date>2012-03-22T22:50:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://9to5mac.com/2012/03/21/new-ipad-wi-fi-issues-seem-to-be-software-related-should-be-easy-to-patch/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>We <a href="http://9to5mac.com/2012/03/21/new-ipad-users-blowing-by-their-monthly-plan-in-hours-thanks-to-lte/">mentioned</a> earlier that some new iPad owners were reporting issues with Wi-Fi. The problem seems to affect all models of the new device with both users of the 4G LTE model and the Wi-Fi-only model experiencing poor Wi-Fi reception. Many forum posters compared Wi-Fi reception with their other iOS devices and MacBooks on the same network:</blockquote>

...unfavourably. We didn't notice any particular problems with the test version of the New iPad. (Thanks @rquick for the link.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>ipad wifi software</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:1ff805150bd0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ipad"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:wifi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/03/19/duqu_trojan_mystery/">
    <title>That MYSTERY Duqu Trojan language: Plain old C &gt;&gt; The Register</title>
    <dc:date>2012-03-19T22:39:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/03/19/duqu_trojan_mystery/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Yes, disappointment: <blockquote>the suggestion that the Duqu Framework might have been developed using old-school Object Orientated C (OO C) hit the bullseye. Code compiled using C and Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 was a close match for the code in the Duqu framework, allowing Kaspersky researchers to conclude that the framework had been written using a custom object-orientated extension to C or plain C with a changed dialect, as Kamluk described it.

"It's old school C. These are techniques used by professional software developers but not malware writers," Kamluk explained.</blockquote>

Surely the implication then is that professional software developers are working on Dugu?]]></description>
<dc:subject>duqu malware software</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:469ca41c5cf8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:duqu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:malware"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.darkreading.com/vulnerability-management/167901026/security/vulnerabilities/232600860/nearly-80-of-all-bugs-are-in-third-party-apps.html">
    <title>Nearly 80% Of All Bugs Are In Third-Party Apps &gt;&gt; Dark Reading</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-15T22:31:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.darkreading.com/vulnerability-management/167901026/security/vulnerabilities/232600860/nearly-80-of-all-bugs-are-in-third-party-apps.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Don't blame it on Microsoft: The lion's share of vulnerabilities last year were in third-party applications, with 78 percent of all bugs, versus 10 percent in Microsoft software products, according to a new report published today.
Secunia's annual report for 2011 found that the number of endpoint flaws jumped past 800 bugs, more than half of which were considered very critical.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft software viruses</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:3745347381df/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:viruses"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/09/the_9x_email_problem/">
    <title>The 9X Email Problem &gt;&gt; Andrew McAfee</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-12T21:58:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://andrewmcafee.org/2006/09/the_9x_email_problem/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Broad-ranging and intriguing: <blockquote>Gourville talks about the ’9X problem’ —  "a mismatch of 9 to 1 between what innovators think consumers want and what consumers actually want."1  The 9X problem goes a long way to explaining the tech industry folk wisdom that to spread like wildfire a new product has to offer a tenfold improvement over  what’s currently out there.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>email software socialnetworking charlesarthur</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:d52f3b969730/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:email"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:socialnetworking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/software/3334812/some-1073-users-encounter-nasty-bug-fix-available/">
    <title>Some 10.7.3 users encounter nasty bug; fix available &gt;&gt; PC Advisor</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-03T06:32:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/software/3334812/some-1073-users-encounter-nasty-bug-fix-available/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[If you're unable to read this because every app you launch crashes, this is the fix. A real bootstrapping problem.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple software bug</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:1b9aaed18ad8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:bug"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/02/02/windows_phone_get_going/">
    <title>Five ways Microsoft can rescue Windows Phone &gt;&gt; The Register</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-02T22:40:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/02/02/windows_phone_get_going/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Andrew Orlowski: <blockquote>Many markets only have room for two leading players - and in the technology platform world, many have only one. On the margins the niche players are little islands. No matter how impressive WP is, if the needle doesn't move, then it too becomes a marginal player. Ecosystems can perish more rapidly than they arise. If Windows Phone is to avoid the same fate as WebOS then the dynamic has to change.

But what might this be?</blockquote>

There's only one key problem from a user's point of view, and it's fixable.]]></description>
<dc:subject>windowsphone nokia smartphones software charlesarthur</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:1c92d7b50fd4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:windowsphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:nokia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/12/20/bug_cause_aussie_a330_plunge/">
    <title>Software bug fingered as cause of Aussie A330 plunge &gt;&gt; The Register</title>
    <dc:date>2012-01-01T22:15:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/12/20/bug_cause_aussie_a330_plunge/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The final report into the 2008 Qantas flight QF72, which unexpectedly dived twice during a routine flight, has blamed a combination of software and hardware errors for the incident.

"On 7 October 2008, the Australian-owned A330-303 aircraft was cruising at 37,000 feet when the autopilot disengaged and the aircraft rose, before plunging downwards sharply, injuring 110 of the aircraft’s 303 passengers and three-quarters of the cabin crew. Three minutes later the aircraft did it again, and the flight crew was bombarded with warnings from the instrumentation – almost all of them false."

More tales from the cockpit.]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlesarthur software programming failsafe realtime safetycritical</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:5855853fee8d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:failsafe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:realtime"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:safetycritical"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://sciencecodemanifesto.org/">
    <title>The Science Code Manifesto</title>
    <dc:date>2011-10-13T22:20:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://sciencecodemanifesto.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[
                
                    "Software is a cornerstone of science. Without software, twenty-first century science would be impossible. Without better software, science cannot progress.

"But the culture and institutions of science have not yet adjusted to this reality. We need to reform them to address this challenge, by adopting these five principles:...."

They're good ones.
                
            ]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlesarthur science opensource openknowledge software</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:8950af035366/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:openknowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://stallman.org/archives/2011-jul-oct.html#06_October_2011_(Steve_Jobs)">
    <title>On Steve Jobs &gt;&gt; Richard Stallman</title>
    <dc:date>2011-10-10T22:11:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://stallman.org/archives/2011-jul-oct.html#06_October_2011_(Steve_Jobs)</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[
                
                    "Steve Jobs, the pioneer of the computer as a jail made cool, designed to sever fools from their freedom, has died.

"As Chicago Mayor Harold Washington said of the corrupt former Mayor Daley, "I'm not glad he's dead, but I'm glad he's gone." Nobody deserves to have to die - not Jobs, not Mr. Bill, not even people guilty of bigger evils than theirs. But we all deserve the end of Jobs' malign influence on people's computing.

"Unfortunately, that influence continues despite his absence. We can only hope his successors, as they attempt to carry on his legacy, will be less effective."

So it goes.
                
            ]]></description>
<dc:subject>stallman software</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:0c8782c4dae4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:stallman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://twitter.com/#!/dickc/status/97686216681594880">
    <title>How Twitters's trends work, explained in a tweet &gt;&gt; Dick Costolo</title>
    <dc:date>2011-09-19T20:15:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://twitter.com/#!/dickc/status/97686216681594880</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Dock Costolo, CEO of Twitter, explains. Sub-140 characters.]]></description>
<dc:subject>twitter trends software</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:ea740e2b27c2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:trends"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2011/09/14/do-users-change-their-settings/">
    <title>Do users change their settings? &gt;&gt; UIE Brain Sparks</title>
    <dc:date>2011-09-19T17:12:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/2011/09/14/do-users-change-their-settings/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Word used to ship with Autosave. But you had to enable it. And people didn't (because people don't change defaults, and they thought Microsoft had disabled it for a well-considered reason). But why was it disabled? <br />
<br />
"It turns out the reason the feature was disabled in that release was not because they had thought about the user’s needs. Instead, it was because a programmer had made a decision to initialize the config.ini file with all zeroes. Making a file filled with zeroes is a quick little program, so that’s what he wrote, assuming that, at some point later, someone would tell him what the “real defaults” should be. Nobody ever got around to telling him.<br />
"Since zero in binary means off, the autosave setting, along with a lot of other settings, were automatically disabled. The users’ assumption that Microsoft had given this careful consideration turned out not to be the case."]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlesarthur microsoft software design usability</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:0869a71a4101/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:usability"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2011/05/the-infinite-version.html">
    <title>The infinite version of Google Chrome &gt;&gt; Coding Horror</title>
    <dc:date>2011-09-17T23:12:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2011/05/the-infinite-version.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Jeff Atwood considers how Google Chrome now needs to download only the tiniest bit of code for its updates - but how work remains to be done: "Since the version updates are relatively small, they can be downloaded in the background. But even Google hasn't figured out how to install an update while the browser is running. Yes, there are little alert icons to let you know your browser is out of date, and you eventually do get nagged if you are woefully behind, but updating always requires the browser to restart."]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlesarthur google twitter software programming</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:4bbd74eff8eb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:programming"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.zdnet.co.uk/blogs/mixed-signals-10000051/bsa-secret-agenda-open-source-saves-the-world-10024295/">
    <title>BSA secret agenda: open source saves the world &gt;&gt; ZDNet UK</title>
    <dc:date>2011-09-08T21:27:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.zdnet.co.uk/blogs/mixed-signals-10000051/bsa-secret-agenda-open-source-saves-the-world-10024295/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Rupert Goodwins turns his gimlet eye onto the Business Software Alliance: "The BSA also says that its survey shows that more than 70% of people agree with it about not being naughty, and blames the disparity on lack of education and enforcement. If we all knew it was wrong, and if we all got caught if we copied software, then that $59bn ["lost to piracy] would magically appear in the bank accounts of Microsoft et al, and the world would be a better place. <br />
"I disagree. Furthermore, I detect a hidden and most praiseworthy agenda behind the BSA's thesis."]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlesarthur piracy software</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:ab45742a6541/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:piracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://stephentrainor.com/tools">
    <title>stephentrainor.com: tools</title>
    <dc:date>2011-09-08T21:21:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://stephentrainor.com/tools</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Sure to be someone who'll like this: "Landscape photographers typically wish to plan their shoots around the times of sunrise/sunset or twilight, or alternatively when the moon is in a particular place in a particular phase.<br />
"While times of sunrise etc. are readily available on various sites on the internet (direction of sunrise etc. less so, but still readily found), there are fewer programs available which combine such information with a topographical map allowing the photographer to match the astronomical to the location.<br />
"A typical use might be to determine when the sun will set along the axis of a mountain valley, or when a full moon rise will rise across a lake.<br />
"The application uses Google Maps providing users the ability to select a location and determine the time and azimuth of sunrise or sunset for a given date or dates."]]></description>
<dc:subject>adobe software photography</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:96bd87a93f39/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:adobe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:photography"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/MouthWideShut.html">
    <title>Mouth Wide Shut &gt;&gt; Joel on Software</title>
    <dc:date>2011-09-05T16:06:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/MouthWideShut.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Joel Spolsky from 2003, but still relevant: "If your policy is Radio Silence, every employee understands it and can follow it. If your policy is in any way complicated, nobody is sure what to do and things leak.<br />
<br />
"Doesn't advance buzz and publicity help? I don't know. A little, but not as much as nonadvance publicity. I'm inclined to think that publicity that comes out when you can't actually buy the product is 90% wasted. Remember that incredibly big burst of Segway publicity about a year ago? With Jeff Bezos and Steve Jobs talking about how “IT” was going to revolutionize the entire universe? Cities would be reconfigured. OK, so, we all talked about the Segway, but nobody could buy one, so it's not clear that it was publicity well-spent. And it certainly seems like the same amount of publicity would have helped more if it appeared when every Walmart has Segways in stock."]]></description>
<dc:subject>software</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:28b977192aae/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/onepercent/2011/08/financial-reporters-threatened.html">
    <title>Software 'journalists' pump out stories in seconds &gt;&gt; New Scientist</title>
    <dc:date>2011-08-24T21:43:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/onepercent/2011/08/financial-reporters-threatened.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) receives thousands of financial documents every day detailing the ins and outs of various publicly traded companies and publishes them on its website. Financial reporters who trawl through these SEC filings can often land a scoop, but it's a tedious and time-consuming task. Now, MarketBrief, a new start-up based in Mountain View, California, promises to publish over 1000 stories per day thanks to its software journalists.<br />
"It's easier than it sounds."<br />
<br />
Philip K Dick must be laughing somewhere; he coined the "homeopapes", self-driven journalist robots, which would do the interviews by doorstepping people too. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlesarthur software journalism</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:78ac66fb6fbe/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:journalism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.scribd.com/doc/60107952/11-03-30-Kootol-Notice-of-Allowance">
    <title>11-03-30 Kootol Notice of Allowance &gt;&gt; US Patent Office</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-17T21:39:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.scribd.com/doc/60107952/11-03-30-Kootol-Notice-of-Allowance</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Kootol's software patent application - "Universal knowledge management and desktop search system" - is now sure to pass through (an apposite phrase) the US Patent Office and be approved. Has the USPTO been asleep for the past 10 years? Google Desktop Search? Anyone?]]></description>
<dc:subject>software patents</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:fd881262c44b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.reddit.com/comments/ir6zc">
    <title>Software patents: the same as mathematical formulae? &gt;&gt; Reddit</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-17T08:29:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.reddit.com/comments/ir6zc</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Prompted by our story about developers pulling back from US app stores because of software patent fears, a discussion on Reddit about what is and isn't patentable about software. Insightful.]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlesarthur software patents</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:e1eb5de031b9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://furbo.org/2011/07/13/the-rise-and-fall-of-the-independent-developer/">
    <title>The Rise and Fall of the Independent Developer &gt;&gt; Craig Hockenberry</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-16T13:08:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://furbo.org/2011/07/13/the-rise-and-fall-of-the-independent-developer/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Hockenberry likes the internet as medium for distribution; "But this expanded distribution is also putting our business at risk: there are people in this new market who claim a right to a part of our hard work. Either by patent or copyright infringement, developers are finding this new cost of litigation to be onerous.<br />
<br />
"The scary part is that these infringements can happen with any part of our products or websites: things that you’d never imagine being a violation of someone else’s intellectual property. It feels like coding in a mine field.<br />
"From our experience, it’s entirely possible that all the revenue for a product can be eaten up by legal fees. After years of pouring your heart and soul into that product, it’s devastating. It makes you question why the hell you’re in the business: when you can’t pay salaries from product sales, there’s no point in building it in the first place."<br />
<br />
<em>All</em> the <em>revenue</em>? Scary.]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlesarthur business software patents copyright</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:d9c8192540b5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:copyright"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.tuaw.com/2011/07/08/interview-growls-project-lead-on-coming-to-the-mac-app-store/">
    <title>Interview: Growl's project lead on coming to the Mac App Store &gt;&gt; The Unofficial Apple Weblog</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-08T15:02:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.tuaw.com/2011/07/08/interview-growls-project-lead-on-coming-to-the-mac-app-store/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Perhaps the biggest piece of news we learned from Forsythe is that in the Mac App Store, for the first time since its creation seven years ago, Growl will not be free. Devs working on the project are "still talking" about the final price, but "it most likely will be a dollar or two dollars at most," according to Forsythe. Some may turn up their noses at paying anything for the results of an open source project, but Forsythe says the reasoning behind the charge is simple: "I'm a grown adult," he says, "and my wife wonders why I spend time working on my open source project and not with my two-month old." For all the work Forsythe and his fellow devs have put into Growl, a few bucks seems little to ask."<br />
<br />
Growl is a very fine piece of software. It's pretty hard to begrudge someone a couple of dollars.]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlesarthur growl software</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:970f498bbe31/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:growl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.slate.com/id/2295816/pagenum/all/">
    <title>Software updates shouldn't need to ask permission &gt;&gt; Slate Magazine</title>
    <dc:date>2011-06-01T05:55:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.slate.com/id/2295816/pagenum/all/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The pain of stuff always wanting an entire separate download needs to end. Like this: "Chrome updates itself automatically, constantly, without asking for permission. Google calls this 'silent updating', because Chrome applies the new code in the background, where you won't notice (unlike the way many programs, including Firefox, ask you to hold on while it refreshes and then demands to be restarted). As a result, every time you start Chrome, you're running the latest 'stable' version available."]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlesarthur software update</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:35d1c39c0d06/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:update"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/bott/an-applecare-support-rep-talks-mac-malware-is-getting-worse/3342">
    <title>An AppleCare support rep talks: Mac malware is &quot;getting worse&quot; &gt;&gt; ZDNet</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-18T20:46:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.zdnet.com/blog/bott/an-applecare-support-rep-talks-mac-malware-is-getting-worse/3342</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[To be precise, Mac *scareware* is worrying a lot of people, and based on this conversation, people at Apple support centres feel obliged to help out. <br />
<br />
It's malware in the sense that it's malicious, but it's classic social engineering, not the exploitation of a vulnerability. <br />
<br />
The irony is that all the noise about "Macs are vulnerable, they need antivirus" and the fact that antivirus companies have been offering products has created the market for this scareware. Security exploits that don't require user interaction aren't showing up, though.<br />
<br />
So the final irony is that people who believe there's no malware for Macs won't be taken in by this. Those who think it's inevitable... will.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple security software</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:ec87d904312d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:security"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://money.cnn.com/2011/05/09/technology/google_gadgets/">
    <title>Google I/O 2011: Google doesn't get gadgets &gt;&gt; CNN Money</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-09T12:18:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://money.cnn.com/2011/05/09/technology/google_gadgets/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Google has a habit of approaching gadgets with a software-maker's mindset. It likes to launch not-quite-ready projects and then quickly improve them on the fly.<br />
"That works just fine on the Web. No one's paying for Google Voice, Google Maps or Gmail, so Google can release those applications and tweak them without many complaints from users.<br />
<br />
"But when you're paying $600 for a Google TV, $200 for an Android phone or $800 for an Android tablet, you're going to want those things to work perfectly. That's just not how Google operates."]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlesarthur google googleio software</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:542616d4320a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:googleio"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>