<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (guardiantech)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from guardiantech</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.asymco.com/2013/10/16/when-will-the-european-union-five-reach-smartphone-saturation/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://stevelitchfield.com/grid.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bgr.in/news/phablets-account-for-30-percent-of-all-smartphones-in-india-67-percent-smartphones-priced-below-200/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.asymco.com/2013/07/17/everybody-has-got-a-smartphone/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://techcrunch.com/2013/06/18/kazam/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.tech-thoughts.net/2013/06/apple-samsung-duopoly-premium-smartphone-market.html#.UcE0QPZAQct"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://googlemobileads.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/understanding-smartphone-use-in-stores.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/enterprise/380581/blackberry-brings-business-services-to-iphone-and-android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.technologyreview.com/news/511796/heres-where-they-make-chinas-cheap-android-smartphones/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/441820/20130304/sony-settles-third-place-smartphone-market-behind.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-21609157"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ben-evans.com/benedictevans/2013/3/2/android-activations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2013022519402293"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.techinasia.com/nokia-china-sales-down-down-down-down-down-2012-q4/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.forbes.com/sites/parmyolson/2013/01/24/calling-china-how-mobile-startup-jolla-will-sell-an-android-alternative/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gizmodo.com/5977625/android-is-popular-because-its-cheap-not-because-its-good"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wired.com/autopia/2012/12/death-to-the-key-fob/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjones/2013/01/16/samsung-smartphones-gaining-momentum-while-iphone-has-leveled-off/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.forbes.com/sites/markrogowsky/2013/01/15/did-the-wsj-get-punkd-on-apple-or-is-it-rotten-to-the-core/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/tech/2012/12/133_127496.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theverge.com/2013/1/2/3828266/ubuntu-phone-os-hands-on"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://techcrunch.com/2012/12/31/nokias-long-drawn-out-decline/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.tech-thoughts.net/2012/12/smartphone-market-share-trends-by-country.html#.UNohMYmLItA"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thenextweb.com/google/2012/12/18/android-botnet-found-on-all-major-us-carriers-sends-thousands-of-spam-texts-to-spread-like-a-virus/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeanbaptiste/2012/12/12/dell-quits-smartphone-business-globally-android/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.economist.com/news/21566417-2013-internet-will-become-mostly-mobile-medium-who-will-be-winners-and-losers-live-and?fsrc=scn/tw_ec/live_and_unplugged"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://communities-dominate.blogs.com/brands/2012/12/android-won-windows-lost-now-what-the-battle-of-the-century-is-decided-microsoft-relegated-to-ever-s.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prHK23847912#.UMXNppOLItB"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://conversations.nokia.com/2012/12/05/the-family-is-growing-nokia-lumia-620/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.wsj.com/tech-europe/2012/12/03/telefonica-fears-over-windows-phone/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thenextweb.com/mobile/2012/11/19/mobile-web-overtakes-desktops-in-china-as-over-50-of-new-internet-users-come-from-rural-areas/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323751104578148101632906788.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.curious-creature.org/docs/android-performance-case-study-1.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.asymco.com/2012/11/29/the-cost-of-selling-galaxies/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/2012/11/20/ntsb-iphone-blackberry/1717945/?dlvrit=110940"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/11/in-a-nutshell-the-android-problem-totally-forked.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/20/china-mobilesubscribers-idUSL3E8M90X420121120"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.businessinsider.com/apples-smartphone-market-share-2012-11"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/13/rims-chief-is-confident-of-blackberry-10-success/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.asymco.com/2012/10/22/nokias-price-for-exclusivity/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20121017PD214.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reghardware.com/2012/10/17/slideshow_history_of_the_smartphone_in_20_handsets/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57508093-94/the-ho-hum-era-of-smartphones-has-begun/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20120907PB201.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fosspatents.com/2012/08/google-loses-leverage-as-motorola.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.asymco.com/2012/08/28/deus-ex-machina/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bloomberg.com/video/apple-jury-foreman-here-s-how-we-reached-a-verdict-RqtqHC25QbOBFg7xrWa5Wg.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.visionmobile.com/blog/2012/06/report-developer-economics-2012-the-new-app-economy/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://techpinions.com/of-apple-samsung-and-obviousness/9304"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/opinon/2012/08/133_118242.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gigaom.com/2012/08/25/counterintuitive-did-samsung-emerge-a-winner/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57500358-37/exclusive-apple-samsung-juror-speaks-out/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pandodaily.com/2012/08/25/copying-works-how-samsungs-decision-to-mimic-apple-paid-off-in-spades/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/News/Press/201208/12-0823E/index.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.computerweekly.com/news/2240161778/RIM-to-lose-stranglehold-on-government-mobile-market"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-22/china-telecom-net-falls-10-on-iphone-costs-beating-estimates.html?cmpid=yhoo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.geekwire.com/2012/red-blue-samsung-iphone-map-oddly-familiar/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1288776/000119312512350915/d396979d8k.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ben-evans.com/post/29128523767/a-first-look-at-samsungs-us-android-business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bgr.com/2012/08/09/htc-criticism-2012-apple-samsung-competition/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.asymco.com/2012/08/06/how-many-of-the-next-generation-of-iphone-will-be-sold/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://techcrunch.com/2012/08/02/canalys-q2-68-of-all-smartphones-shipped-were-android-chinas-the-biggest-market-by-a-wide-margin/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://twitter.com/asymco/statuses/230636183426830336"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-22/samsung-and-apple-global-patent-fight-moves-to-australia-trial.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.htc.com/2012/03/ics/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theverge.com/2012/7/21/3174432/beats-buys-back-controlling-interest-from-htc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://karan301.tumblr.com/post/27551598600/what-is-the-future-of-the-iphone-3gs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thenextweb.com/2012/07/18/apple-adds-uniqueidentifier-to-in-app-purchase-receipts-not-udid-may-be-related-to-recent-breach/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/12/07/17/0024240/it-costs-450-in-marketing-to-make-someone-buy-a-49-nokia-lumia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/12/07/09/chinas_smartphone_market_grows_164_apples_ios_takes_173_share.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://www.asymco.com/2013/10/16/when-will-the-european-union-five-reach-smartphone-saturation/">
    <title>When will the European Union Five reach smartphone saturation? &gt;&gt; asymco</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-16T11:28:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.asymco.com/2013/10/16/when-will-the-european-union-five-reach-smartphone-saturation/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>If we define saturation as the end of the “Late Majority” period then the number of new-to-smartphone users remaining for the combined EU5 + USA markets is 110m of which 59m will adopt in the US and 51 million in Europe. They will all join ecosystems in the next two years.<p>

Plan accordingly.</blockquote>

Current US + EU5 adult consumer smartphone population: 315m. Which will grow roughly by a third. Note his caveat: "The population is defined as adults using phones for themselves. Meaning it excludes children and phones purchased by companies."

Question is whether that is headroom or legroom for growth.]]></description>
<dc:subject>asymco smartphones saturation</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:ab3aa8b92544/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:asymco"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:saturation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://stevelitchfield.com/grid.htm">
    <title>PDA/mobile device comparison / chooser &gt;&gt; Steve Litchfield</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-14T19:06:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://stevelitchfield.com/grid.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The idea here is to score most current PDA/smartphone solutions and see which one comes out on top. The scores for each criteria are my own personal evaluations. You can apply your own weightings, though, and the page will multiply everything up and work out your most suitable smartphone solution. Models and scores: (10=excellent, 1=terrible). Weightings: 'Not'/'Quite'/'Very' multiplies scores by 0, 1 or 2 respectively.</blockquote>

Quite fun, though it would be better - as in more honest - if you couldn't see the matrix of offerings while you're choosing. Needs lots of browser width, so maybe not one for the phone.]]></description>
<dc:subject>smartphones choose matrix</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:4d033ca99a13/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:choose"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:matrix"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.bgr.in/news/phablets-account-for-30-percent-of-all-smartphones-in-india-67-percent-smartphones-priced-below-200/">
    <title>Phablets account for 30% of all smartphones in India, 67% smartphones priced below $200 &gt;&gt; BGR India</title>
    <dc:date>2013-08-30T14:19:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.bgr.in/news/phablets-account-for-30-percent-of-all-smartphones-in-india-67-percent-smartphones-priced-below-200/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Rajat Agrawalj: <blockquote>Phablets or smartphones with displays between 5in and 6.99in accounted for 30% of all smartphones shipped in India in Q2, 2013, according to the latest IDC figures. Phablet shipments increased 17 times year-on-year with smartphone shipments hitting 9.3m units compared to just 3.5m units in Q2, 2012. The magic formula for India seems to be having a sub-$200 smartphone with a large display and dual-SIM slots.<p>Local vendors continue to dominate the Indian smartphone space with Micromax shipping over 2m smartphones in the quarter making it the second largest player with a market share of 22% behind Samsung’s 26% share. IDC claims that local vendors now account for over half of the total smartphone market in India.</blockquote>

It's not a big market in volume terms, but the choice of phablets seems to point to a trend: countries with low PC penetration go for maximum screen sizes along with connectivity. Anecdotally, the Galaxy Note is very popular there.]]></description>
<dc:subject>india smartphones phablets</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:3fbaffded600/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:india"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:phablets"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.asymco.com/2013/07/17/everybody-has-got-a-smartphone/">
    <title>“Everybody has got a smartphone” &gt;&gt; asymco</title>
    <dc:date>2013-07-17T09:31:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.asymco.com/2013/07/17/everybody-has-got-a-smartphone/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Horace Dediu, countering the claims of a UBS analyst (as in the headline): <blockquote>The data shows that churn between platforms (except for BlackBerry) is still negligible and that the majority of user losses can be attributed to non-smart devices.<p>

To summarize, with penetration now at about 60% in the US, the rate of adoption of smartphones is not slowing in any perceptible way.<p>

So not only is there no saturation, but there is no slowing of adoption of smartphones in the US, the most penetrated large market.<p>

Globally, the penetration of smartphones is less than half of that in the US. About 4 billion people are about to switch.</blockquote>

If anything, smartphone adoption as a percentage of remaining non-smart users is actually rising. But it's always worth pointing out that the US is an unusual market because of the distortions introduced by its contracts - SIM-only deals are pretty much unheard of, for example.]]></description>
<dc:subject>smartphones us</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:0e4a51514de6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:us"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://techcrunch.com/2013/06/18/kazam/">
    <title>Kazam Is Another European Startup Hoping Against Hope To Inch In To The Smartphone Hardware Market &gt;&gt; TechCrunch</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-19T04:47:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://techcrunch.com/2013/06/18/kazam/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Natasha Lomas (hat tip to @modelportfolio2003):

<blockquote>Details of how exactly Kazam plans to assault the Samsung and Apple smartphone duopoly were not forthcoming when I asked. Atkins declined to answer the bulk of my questions — including such specifics as whether Kazam’s planned smartphones will run Android and be skinned with a  custom UI or keep the experience familiarly stock. Instead, he trotted out a repeated PR mantra: “Today we are just announcing that the Kazam brand is here, for the rest you will have to wait and see.”</blockquote>

Remember the days when the UK had its own smartphone manufacturer, Sendo? That didn't end so well. Now Kazam, launched by two former HTC executives, is having another crack at the market, with plans to launch devices later this year. But for now, it's all brand and no (public) hardware.]]></description>
<dc:subject>kazam smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:a4905abcd0e7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:kazam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.tech-thoughts.net/2013/06/apple-samsung-duopoly-premium-smartphone-market.html#.UcE0QPZAQct">
    <title>Premium Smartphone Market: Why the Apple vs. Samsung Duopoly is Misleading &gt;&gt; Tech-Thoughts</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-19T04:40:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.tech-thoughts.net/2013/06/apple-samsung-duopoly-premium-smartphone-market.html#.UcE0QPZAQct</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Sameer Singh (hat tip to @HotSoup):

<blockquote>The chart above shows the ratio of premium ($400+) smartphone shipments from other vendors to Apple's and Samsung's shipments. While the share of "Others" in the premium smartphone market doubled from 7% in May 2012, to 15% in May 2013, the pattern with respect to Apple & Samsung is quite interesting. In May 2012, premium smartphone shipments from "Others" were just 10% of Apple's shipments and about 35% of Samsung's shipments. By May 2013, the shipments from "Others" had grown to nearly 40% of Apple's shipments and remained at 32% of Samsung's shipments.</blockquote>

A smart look at the data, but do you agree with the conclusion that "the $400+, premium smartphone market may begin to lose its relevance in a year"?]]></description>
<dc:subject>samsung apple smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:0b911a1010a9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://googlemobileads.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/understanding-smartphone-use-in-stores.html">
    <title>Understanding smartphone use in stores: shoppers who use mobile more, spend more in store &gt;&gt; Google Mobile Ads Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2013-05-12T20:28:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://googlemobileads.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/understanding-smartphone-use-in-stores.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The self-interest runs like the words through a stick of rock in this post, but this is intriguing: <blockquote><strong>Shoppers who use mobile more, spend more in store</strong><br />
While many businesses might assume that smartphone use in store drives shoppers to seek better prices elsewhere and order online, we found that the opposite was true. We compared the in-store purchases of moderate and frequent smartphone users and found that basket sizes of frequent mobile shoppers were 25-50% higher. For instance, while the average appliance smartphone shoppers spends $250 per shopping trip, frequent smartphone shoppers spend $350. Marketers shouldn’t shy away from the showrooming challenge, and should instead, meet it head on.</blockquote>

The only, but crucially big, question: is this causation - using smartphones more means you spend more - or correlation: people who use their smartphones more are also, for whatever reason, big spenders?]]></description>
<dc:subject>digital mobile retail shopping smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:7a9171a9f625/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:digital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:mobile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:retail"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:shopping"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/enterprise/380581/blackberry-brings-business-services-to-iphone-and-android">
    <title>BlackBerry brings business services to iPhone and Android &gt;&gt; PC Pro</title>
    <dc:date>2013-03-14T22:40:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/enterprise/380581/blackberry-brings-business-services-to-iphone-and-android</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>A new app from BlackBerry will allow users to securely separate work and personal data on iOS and Android-powered devices.<p>

Secure Work Space will be available before the end of June, and will allow corporate users of BlackBerry Enterprise Service 10 to handle devices using non-BlackBerry operating systems. The move will encourage business customers to continue to use BlackBerry's services to manage devices on their networks, even if employees use them as both business and as personal devices.</blockquote>

Neat idea, but does it signal a retreat, or just a redoubt, from the handset business? It also puts BES up against companies such as Airwatch and Citrix, which offer similar products.]]></description>
<dc:subject>blackberry smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:dc7d161aaffb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:blackberry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.technologyreview.com/news/511796/heres-where-they-make-chinas-cheap-android-smartphones/">
    <title>Apple, Samsung, challenged by cheap Chinese Android phones &gt;&gt; MIT Technology Review</title>
    <dc:date>2013-03-14T22:38:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.technologyreview.com/news/511796/heres-where-they-make-chinas-cheap-android-smartphones/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The change began in 2011, when computer-chip makers began selling off-the-shelf chipsets—the set of processors that are the brains of a touchscreen phone. Those, plus Google’s free Android operating system, made smartphones much easier to produce.<p>
The flood of inexpensive devices could hurt struggling phone makers like Nokia and might also force Samsung and Apple to offer cheaper models. “They have reached their peak,” Liang said during an interview near his office in Shenzhen, which has become a hub for electronics makers. “In [manufacturing] technique we are close to the same level. Then the only difference will be the cost and the brand.”</blockquote>

Note that though they're Android phones, they generally don't have Google services.]]></description>
<dc:subject>smartphones china android</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:ac858db21207/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/441820/20130304/sony-settles-third-place-smartphone-market-behind.htm">
    <title>Sony happy with third spot in smartphone market &gt;&gt; IBTimes UK</title>
    <dc:date>2013-03-04T22:02:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/441820/20130304/sony-settles-third-place-smartphone-market-behind.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>"Sony needs to sell about 50 million smartphones to rank third, behind Apple and Samsung. I think Sony has the ability to achieve it, but if it can't reach 50 million, it will fade and become irrelevant."<p>

At the end of 2012, Sony was ranked fourth in the global smartphone market by IDC, behind Huawei with 4.9% and ahead of ZTE with 4.3%. Samsung and Apple combined command more than half the market.<p>

However, when you look at the stats for 2012 as a whole Sony doesn't appear in the top five at all, indicating that it is staging something of a resurgence in this space.</blockquote>

"Sony happy" here means "Sony <em>will</em> be happy". ]]></description>
<dc:subject>sony smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:57dd5763cbc4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:sony"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-21609157">
    <title>NFC - not for consumers? &gt;&gt; BBC News</title>
    <dc:date>2013-03-03T22:16:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-21609157</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Rory Cellan-Jones: <blockquote>In 2007 I was involved in a trial where I used an early NFC phone to get access to London's transport system and pay for a coffee or a sandwich.<p>

The experiment was hailed a success by the companies involved, but although you can now use NFC credit cards on London buses, there is no sign yet of travellers being allowed to swipe in via their phones.<p>

Still, the GSMA now believes there is enough momentum and enough real-world examples of the technology that millions of us will soon be using it - even if we don't know it.<p>

So convinced were the organisers of Mobile World Congress that they encouraged visitors to get an NFC pass for speedier entry to an event where security involves showing photo ID.<p>

Sadly, the people I met told me that it proved to be a slower way of getting in than the old fashioned non-NFC pass.</blockquote>

(Thanks @challengingviews for the link.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>nfc smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:c54c97592c5a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:nfc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ben-evans.com/benedictevans/2013/3/2/android-activations">
    <title>Android activations &gt;&gt; Benedict Evans</title>
    <dc:date>2013-03-03T21:22:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://ben-evans.com/benedictevans/2013/3/2/android-activations</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Android activations themselves, of course, are a somewhat murky data point. ​It has never been entirely clear (to me at least) how devices that are activated twice (for the growing second hand market, for example) are treated. On the other hand the great majority of Android devices sold in China, which are probably a third of the total, come with no Google services installed, including no Google Play, and hence are not even included in Google's activation numbers, since signing into Google Play is what counts as 'activation'. Even some Motorola phones are sold in this state. Such devices are invisible to Google.<p>

In other words, asking Google about Android activations is a little like asking Microsoft about the Windows install base: it has some idea, but not a very precise one. ​Over time, with the proliferation of Kindle Fires, Android Car DVD players and all manner of other things, it might be a little like asking Linus Torvalds how many Linux devices there are: how should he know?</blockquote>

Note that IDC and Gartner include as "Android" those phones sold in China which don't connect to Google; they're somewhere between a quarter and a third of the "Android" figure quoted in, say, quarterly stats..]]></description>
<dc:subject>android google smartphones mobile</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:350abbe3eb83/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:mobile"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2013022519402293">
    <title>The CCIA and RIM tell the FTC banning injunctions for FRAND patents can make smartphone wars worse &gt;&gt; Groklaw</title>
    <dc:date>2013-02-26T16:36:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2013022519402293</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The FTC is now suggesting that companies that own standards-essential patents and offer them under FRAND terms, like Motorola, should not be allowed to seek injunctions regarding those kinds of patents except in the most extreme of circumstances. But for decades, they had those property rights, the right to seek injunctive relief. How can a government agency just show up and take those traditional rights away by fiat, without reasonable compensation? That's not America, to me. I don't even like software patents, but as long as the patent system exists, you want it to be fair. And this just feels wrong.</blockquote>

This seems to be a case of Groklaw deciding which side it likes, and tailoring its thinking to go along with it. The reason to oppose injunctions on standards-essential patents (SEPs) - which Google (via Motorola) and Samsung own lots of - is that it would allow the owners of those SEPs to shut rivals who need to meet standards out of the marketplace, simply by withdrawing the rival's permission to use those patents. Being part of a standard requires licensing to all comers. (The idea that stopping injunctions over SEPs would make things worse is obvious nonsense. Nor is the FTC saying that SEP injunctions aren't ever allowed. )]]></description>
<dc:subject>patents smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:a7457100089b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.techinasia.com/nokia-china-sales-down-down-down-down-down-2012-q4/">
    <title>Nokia sales down 79% in China as Symbian dies, Lumia slow to grow &gt;&gt; Tech In Asia</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-24T21:42:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.techinasia.com/nokia-china-sales-down-down-down-down-down-2012-q4/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>If you thought Nokia’s China figures for 2011 were a disaster, you should see what just emerged today. Nokia’s China nightmare is clearly not yet over as the country’s growing middle-class continues <a href="http://www.techinasia.com/canalys-china-smartphone-sales-2012/">to pick up iPhones and Android smartphones</a>. That’s the picture painted by Nokia’s full-year 2012 report that came out today. It shows Nokia sales revenue down 79% in China from the previous year, and phone units plummeted 69% to a mere 4.6m sold in the final quarter of last year.</blockquote>

China is very, very important for Nokia.]]></description>
<dc:subject>nokia smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:797f44cd88e3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:nokia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.forbes.com/sites/parmyolson/2013/01/24/calling-china-how-mobile-startup-jolla-will-sell-an-android-alternative/">
    <title>Calling China: how mobile startup Jolla will sell an Android alternative &gt;&gt; Forbes</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-24T21:35:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.forbes.com/sites/parmyolson/2013/01/24/calling-china-how-mobile-startup-jolla-will-sell-an-android-alternative/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Parmy Olson: <blockquote>Jolla cofounder and CEO Marc Dillon claims that many of China’s mobile users are sick of Android. “Standing out is really important in Chinese culture,” he says. Last June he struck a distribution deal with D.Phone, the nation’s largest mobile phone retailer, with 2,000 stores, to sell Jolla’s first model this summer. ST-Ericsson is making the processors for Sailfish phones, and Jolla tapped into its network to find a local handsetmaker.<p>

Jolla now does R&D in Hong Kong, where local and Chinese chipset vendors, handset and component makers, and retailers are part of an alliance. The partners are kicking in $270m to get Sailfish phones in the hands of Chinese consumers. While Sailfish is open source – cynics might opine that everything in China is open source – Jolla also plans to make money via licensing deals and selling its expertise to install the platform on locally made handsets.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>android jolla china smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:90a95ca9cd96/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:jolla"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://gizmodo.com/5977625/android-is-popular-because-its-cheap-not-because-its-good">
    <title>Android is popular because it's cheap, not because it's good &gt;&gt; Gizmodo</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-23T00:32:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://gizmodo.com/5977625/android-is-popular-because-its-cheap-not-because-its-good</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Sam Biddle: <blockquote>Phones like the Nexus 4 and Galaxy SIII are tremendous as both pieces of hardware and containers for smart, thoughtful software. Each is a pleasure to use, but that's not Android's sharpest knife.<p>

Android's success isn't really about these phones. It's about the ZTE Warp, LG Motion, and Samsung Captivate—which retail for $100, $50, and a penny, respectively. It's about these marginal, middling phones that can be sold like bags of Doritos or bargain-bin sweaters—they're priced to move, not priced to be ogled at or aspired towards. And it's working.<p>

The last study conducted by the Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project shows that Android is the chosen smartphone of people without money. Among respondents, 22% of those with annual incomes below $30,000 were Android owners, as opposed to just 12% for iPhone. With those towards the lower-middle class, the trend holds: Android owns 23% of incomes up to $50,000, with iPhones at 18%. The data makes it clear: the less money you have, the more likely you are to opt for an Android phone over something more expensive.</blockquote>

This is emphatically not, in case you were wondering, a bad thing.]]></description>
<dc:subject>android pricing smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:8817f83808b5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:pricing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wired.com/autopia/2012/12/death-to-the-key-fob/">
    <title>Your smartphone will replace your car keys by 2015 &gt;&gt; Wired.com</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-17T17:05:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wired.com/autopia/2012/12/death-to-the-key-fob/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Your smartphone has the potential to replace nearly everything else in your pockets, so why not your car keys? Hyundai is working to do just that, with an embedded NFC tag that allows you to open your car, start the engine and link up to the touchscreen with a simple swipe.</blockquote>

You don't have to think for long to think of at least two serious security flaws in this system - one which makes the car too accessible, the other which makes it inaccessible.]]></description>
<dc:subject>smartphones cars</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:fbc7e4241023/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:cars"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjones/2013/01/16/samsung-smartphones-gaining-momentum-while-iphone-has-leveled-off/">
    <title>Samsung smartphones gaining momentum while iPhone has levelled off &gt;&gt; Forbes</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-16T10:11:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjones/2013/01/16/samsung-smartphones-gaining-momentum-while-iphone-has-leveled-off/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Chuck Jones, on a US-based survey: <blockquote>While Apple still has almost a 2.5x higher purchase intention vs. Samsung (50% vs. 21%) Samsung’s result was even greater in the December quarter than the June quarter when the Galaxy SIII became available (21% vs. 19%).  Also the percentage of people who are planning on purchasing Samsung has increased over 4x from just 5% in the September 2011 quarter to 21% in the December 2012 quarter.</blockquote>

The more worrying thing, as he points out, is that when you combine the intent to buy an Apple or Samsung handset, it's around 70% - which doesn't leave much room for HTC, Motorola, RIM or Nokia to make any money. (Thanks @rquick for the link.) ]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple samsung smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:39772f811b89/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.forbes.com/sites/markrogowsky/2013/01/15/did-the-wsj-get-punkd-on-apple-or-is-it-rotten-to-the-core/">
    <title>Why the WSJ got the 'iPhone demand is crashing' story all wrong &gt;&gt; Forbes</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-15T23:09:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.forbes.com/sites/markrogowsky/2013/01/15/did-the-wsj-get-punkd-on-apple-or-is-it-rotten-to-the-core/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Mark Rogowsky: <blockquote>Cnet was very excited about Samsung’s announcement that the Galaxy S phone line had <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57563765-94/samsung-weve-sold-100-million-galaxy-s-smartphones/">crossed the 100 million mark in total sales</a>. The phone is so desirable, “Sales of the flagship Galaxy S3 reached 30m units in 5 months, and 40m in 7 months, with average daily sales of about 190,000 units.” You’d think that it’s the hottest thing going with those numbers. Of course, as we were just discussing above, in the quarter just ended, Apple will have sold about as many iPhone 5′s as Samsung has sold Galaxy S3′s in 7 months! This is what the “experts” are already calling trouble and they haven’t seen the numbers yet.<p>

Now, of course, Samsung is also selling the prior generation S2, which Cnet tells us, “…is described as a steady bet after recording sales of over 40 million in 20 months.” So that’s about 2m a month for that model to go with the 17m S3 phones Samsung apparently moved in Q3. In other words, if we just compare the last two generations of phones, Apple sold somewhere around 35-45m last quarter while Samsung moved about 23m. It’s certainly true that Samsung has a number of less-expensive entry models and will outsell Apple in raw numbers. But when one looks at “profit share” and wonders why Apple will continue to earn more of it in smartphones than Samsung, those numbers tell the story.</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>iphone samsung smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:23a57fd8ff8f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/tech/2012/12/133_127496.html">
    <title>Samsung aims to sell 510 million phones &gt;&gt; Korea Times</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-02T23:06:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/tech/2012/12/133_127496.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Samsung Electronics, one half of the global duopoly on smartphones, claims 2013 will be the year when it separates itself from bitter rival Apple.<p>

The Korean technology giant is the world’s largest maker of mobile phones and aims to ship a record 510 million handsets next year.</blockquote>

That's a lot of handsets - up 20% from an estimated 420m in 2012. And out of that 510m, it aims for 390m to be smartphones, according to a Samsung supplier.]]></description>
<dc:subject>samsung smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:17276b16afa4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theverge.com/2013/1/2/3828266/ubuntu-phone-os-hands-on">
    <title>Hands-on with Ubuntu's brand-new, gesture-based phone OS &gt;&gt; The Verge</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-02T22:08:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theverge.com/2013/1/2/3828266/ubuntu-phone-os-hands-on</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Our top London agent Vlad Savov just got his hands on the new Ubuntu phone OS and was able to get a quick look at some of the new OS's trademark features, including its new gesture-based interface. There's a bit of lag while swiping through the phone's different panels, but overall it looks to be quite the attractive and intelligent interface. Unlike nearly all of the major phone operating systems, there's no "home" button to speak of in Ubuntu — it's all based on gestures.</blockquote>

Slated to have shipping devices in early 2014. Questions: who will make the hardware and how good are Canonical's patent lawyers for the inevitable fights if it gains any traction?]]></description>
<dc:subject>ubuntu smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:607dce95eb94/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ubuntu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://techcrunch.com/2012/12/31/nokias-long-drawn-out-decline/">
    <title>Innovate or die: Nokia’s long-drawn-out decline &gt;&gt; TechCrunch</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-01T21:47:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://techcrunch.com/2012/12/31/nokias-long-drawn-out-decline/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Natasha Lomas: <blockquote>[Ian] Fogg [analyst at IHS Screen Digest] believes Nokia’s current set of problems with Windows Phones are not explained by a failure of execution; now it’s their strategy that’s the problem. While Elop “rightly saw” that mobile was becoming a “war of ecosystems,” choosing Windows Phone to fight the dominant players of Android and iOS has simply dragged Nokia down, he argues. “Now it’s Windows Phone that is holding Nokia back. Windows Phone is proving a hard sell because of the success of Android and iOS.”<p>

Adopting Windows Phone also means Nokia is now reliant on Microsoft’s execution — and Redmond continues to lag behind the pace of development on the dominant smartphone platforms. “Microsoft has been slow to innovate with Windows Phone, which has held Nokia back,” says Fogg. “The current version, Windows Phone 8, is little different in consumer features to Windows Phone 7 of two years ago. In the meantime, Apple and Google have piled on numerous more features to iOS and Android.”<p>

“Elop chose Windows Phone also because he could reduce costs by lowering the number of Nokia staff working on content and services. Ironically, Nokia is having to stimulate the Windows Phone ecosystem by content deals to attempt to get the platform moving,” Fogg adds.</blockquote>

This is the question on which the whole of Nokia's present and future revolves. Should it have gone with Android? Would it have been able to compete with Samsung and be as big, or would it be struggling as HTC now is, stuck in the mid-market? 

Though the claim that Android and iOS have added more features than Windows Phone (especially Nokia's version) doesn't quite stack up. Nokia's Windows Phone has plenty of standout features (Kids Corner, Nokia Music, City Lens).]]></description>
<dc:subject>nokia windowsphone smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:9558bbc6d283/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:nokia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:windowsphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.tech-thoughts.net/2012/12/smartphone-market-share-trends-by-country.html#.UNohMYmLItA">
    <title>Smartphone market share trends by country: Android dominant, iPhone gains, Windows Phone slips further &gt;&gt; Tech-Thoughts</title>
    <dc:date>2012-12-25T22:00:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.tech-thoughts.net/2012/12/smartphone-market-share-trends-by-country.html#.UNohMYmLItA</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Sameer Singh posted this on Christmas Day. We'd just like you to know that.]]></description>
<dc:subject>android smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:244bb28cd759/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thenextweb.com/google/2012/12/18/android-botnet-found-on-all-major-us-carriers-sends-thousands-of-spam-texts-to-spread-like-a-virus/">
    <title>Android botnet found on all major US carriers sends thousands of spam texts to infect users &gt;&gt; The Next Web</title>
    <dc:date>2012-12-19T20:56:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://thenextweb.com/google/2012/12/18/android-botnet-found-on-all-major-us-carriers-sends-thousands-of-spam-texts-to-spread-like-a-virus/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>A new Android spam botnet has been discovered that uses infected phones to send thousands of SMS messages without the user’s permission. While the threat is not (yet) widespread, it has already been spotted on all major US carriers and has the potential to make a big impact at the network level if it isn’t dealt with soon.<p>

On December 3, security firm Lookout detected the threat, which it dubbed SpamSoldier, in cooperation with one of its unnamed carrier partners. It spreads through SMS messages (it has not yet been detected on any major app stores) that advertise free versions of popular paid games like Angry Birds Space.</blockquote>

The text that spreads it looks pretty obviously spam. Except people fall for spam.]]></description>
<dc:subject>android malware hacking spam smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:0cc4676b4117/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:malware"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:hacking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeanbaptiste/2012/12/12/dell-quits-smartphone-business-globally-android/">
    <title>Dell quits smartphone business globally, drops Android &gt;&gt; Forbes</title>
    <dc:date>2012-12-14T23:17:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeanbaptiste/2012/12/12/dell-quits-smartphone-business-globally-android/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Now in the 5th year of its “transformation,” Dell’s mobile strategy looks very much like it was before its push in the consumer business and the adoption of Google‘s Android system for most of its mobile devices (Streak, Aero, Thunder).<p>

“It’s a content play with Android. Amazon is selling books and Google is making it up with search. So far we couldn’t find a way to build a business on Android,” added [Jeff] Clarke [head of Dell's Consumer Division].</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>dell smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:a6fa8ed0373d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:dell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.economist.com/news/21566417-2013-internet-will-become-mostly-mobile-medium-who-will-be-winners-and-losers-live-and?fsrc=scn/tw_ec/live_and_unplugged">
    <title>Business: Live and unplugged &gt;&gt; The Economist</title>
    <dc:date>2012-12-10T22:04:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.economist.com/news/21566417-2013-internet-will-become-mostly-mobile-medium-who-will-be-winners-and-losers-live-and?fsrc=scn/tw_ec/live_and_unplugged</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>IDATE, a consultancy, reckons that the number of people accessing the internet via mobile devices will overtake the number using fixed-line connections in mid-2014.<p>

That does not mean that mobile devices will displace PCs altogether. The rise of mobile phones, after all, did not mean that fixed-line phones stopped working, even if their number is now in decline. Although mobile devices and users will soon be more numerous, for the time being they will account for a smaller volume of traffic and fewer minutes of overall use than PC-based browsing. Yet the centre of gravity of the internet will have shifted.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>internet mobile smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:9252375ab580/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:mobile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://communities-dominate.blogs.com/brands/2012/12/android-won-windows-lost-now-what-the-battle-of-the-century-is-decided-microsoft-relegated-to-ever-s.html">
    <title>Android won. Windows lost. Now what? The battle of the century is decided. Microsoft relegated to ever smaller PC corner as Google conquers the world &gt;&gt; Communities Dominate Brands</title>
    <dc:date>2012-12-10T13:02:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://communities-dominate.blogs.com/brands/2012/12/android-won-windows-lost-now-what-the-battle-of-the-century-is-decided-microsoft-relegated-to-ever-s.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Tomi Ahonen:<blockquote>the winner is Google with Android. The future of computing, the future of the internet, the future of music, of gaming, of television, of newsmedia, of banking and credit cards and even cash itself. The platform that will be in our cars, soon in our clothes and eventually embedded within humans - all that will be owned and controlled by Google, as an evolution of what we now know 'only' as the smartphone platform, Android. Wow. So this is my first blog after Google achieved its victory, to examine these thoughts, what does that mean for humanity, for business and tech, for media and marketing and advertising.</blockquote>

Those who know Ahonen's writings will know that (a) he examines this at length (b) it turns out to be Nokia's fault. (Thanks @modelportfolio2003 for the link.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>android google microsoft trends smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:fee33871199f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:trends"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prHK23847912#.UMXNppOLItB">
    <title>Over three times more smartphones shipped than PCs in 2012 Q3 in the Peoples' Republic of China &gt;&gt; IDC</title>
    <dc:date>2012-12-10T12:09:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prHK23847912#.UMXNppOLItB</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>According to the latest IDC Asia/Pacific Quarterly Mobile Phone Tracker, the PRC smartphone shipments reached a record high and broke past the 60m unit mark in 2012 Q3, over three times more than PRC PC shipments in the same quarter. Smartphones shipped to the PRC grew 38% QoQ, far outpacing the 9% QoQ growth of the total mobile phone market.<p>

"Vendors ramped up shipments and aggressively launched new models to meet consumer demand during the Q3 summer school vacation and the National Day holiday period," said James Yan, Senior Market Analyst for Computing Systems Research at IDC China. "A new wave of sub-US$150 smartphones with upgraded specifications, such as a 4-inch+ screen size and dual-core application processors, were especially popular."</blockquote>

That's mainland China (as opposed to Taiwan.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>china smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:fd4851d8e70f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://conversations.nokia.com/2012/12/05/the-family-is-growing-nokia-lumia-620/">
    <title>The family is growing: Nokia Lumia 620 &gt;&gt; Nokia Conversations</title>
    <dc:date>2012-12-05T22:21:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://conversations.nokia.com/2012/12/05/the-family-is-growing-nokia-lumia-620/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Nokia's official blog: <blockquote>this is Windows Phone 8, so the Nokia Lumia 620 comes with Live Tiles for updates direct to the Start Screen, PeopleHub for all your address books in one place and a Me Tile to make it easy to post and track notifications across social networks. With Xbox Live, Microsoft Office, 7GB of SkyDrive storage and faster, safer surfing with Internet Explorer 10, it’s hard to know what to do first. You might want to start with Angry Birds Star Wars or Words with Friends – just a suggestion.<p>

Excluding any local taxes or operator subsidies, the Nokia Lumia 620 will cost around $249 USD and will be available from Q1 2013.</blockquote>

To quote a former Nokia head of PR, "survival is in our DNA." (Thanks @rquick for the link.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>nokia smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:1dfd03eff373/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:nokia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.wsj.com/tech-europe/2012/12/03/telefonica-fears-over-windows-phone/">
    <title>Telefónica fears over Windows Phone &gt;&gt; WSJ</title>
    <dc:date>2012-12-04T21:45:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.wsj.com/tech-europe/2012/12/03/telefonica-fears-over-windows-phone/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Ben Rooney: <blockquote>Matthew Key, who heads Telefónica Digital, which has been the only one of the giant Spanish telco’s four main divisions not to be based in Madrid, expressed doubts over Windows Phone.<p>

“I think the [Windows Phone] software is interesting,” he said. “The devices are coming. Whether it is going to be market moving, the jury is out. Do we see it will help us rapidly drive adoption in Latin America? No. Do we see Mozilla stuff we are doing? Yes.<p>

“We are over-reliant on [two manufacturers] iOS with Apple and Android with Samsung. For us to have a third OS is an important de-risker from a strategic perspective.”</blockquote>

The "third OS" isn't BlackBerry or Windows Phone; it's Mozilla's Firefox OS.]]></description>
<dc:subject>smartphones mozilla</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:9c4a5ef74379/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:mozilla"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thenextweb.com/mobile/2012/11/19/mobile-web-overtakes-desktops-in-china-as-over-50-of-new-internet-users-come-from-rural-areas/">
    <title>Mobile Web overtakes desktops in China as over 50% of new Internet users come from rural areas &gt;&gt; The Next Web</title>
    <dc:date>2012-12-03T22:32:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://thenextweb.com/mobile/2012/11/19/mobile-web-overtakes-desktops-in-china-as-over-50-of-new-internet-users-come-from-rural-areas/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Mobile phones have become the most common way for Chinese citizens to connect to the Internet, meaning the mobile web has surpassed desktops. This is largely thanks to rural areas, which are driving over 50% of new Internet users in the country.<p>The latest numbers come from a report issued by the state-linked China Internet Network Information Centre (<a href="http://www.cnnic.net.cn/">CINIC</a>) and cited by <a href="http://ondeviceresearch.com/blog/mobile-web-overtakes-pc-web-in-china">On Device Research</a>.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>web china mobile smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:4188099ed928/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:mobile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323751104578148101632906788.html">
    <title>Lenovo takes on Apple, Samsung &gt;&gt; WSJ.com</title>
    <dc:date>2012-12-03T17:39:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323751104578148101632906788.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Lenovo says its smartphone business is unprofitable, without disclosing the loss. But its market share in China, where the company sells most of its phones, soared to 15% in the third quarter from 1.7% a year earlier. That placed Lenovo second only to Samsung, with 16.7%, and well ahead of Apple, with 6.9%, according to Gartner. The research firm predicts that Lenovo will become the No. 1 smartphone vendor in China this year.<p>
Lenovo Chief Executive Yang Yuanqing said recently that the company hasn't been able to generate a profit in smartphones in part because of its investment in marketing and sales. He expects the business to become profitable in China in two to three quarters, he said…<p>Still, some analysts are skeptical about whether Lenovo can be successful world-wide.<p>

"The strategy of initially seeking a large market share in terms of volume, and then trying to increase margins later, rarely works," said Nicolas Baratte, CLSA's head of technology research for the Asian-Pacific region. Price competition keeps margins thin, he said.</blockquote>

Dramatic. (Subscription required.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>lenovo smartphones china</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:abc0e6f7a902/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:lenovo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:china"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.curious-creature.org/docs/android-performance-case-study-1.html">
    <title>Android performance case study: Falcon Pro &gt;&gt; Curious Creature</title>
    <dc:date>2012-12-03T06:30:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.curious-creature.org/docs/android-performance-case-study-1.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Romain Guy is a software engineer at Google: <blockquote>My goal in this article is to show you how you can track down and fix performance issues in an application, even if you don’t have its source code. All you need is a copy of the latest Android 4.2 SDK – the new ADT bundle makes setup a breeze. I would highly recommend you download the application to apply the techniques described here on your own. Falcon Pro is unfortunately – for you – a paid application and I will therefore provide links to various files you can download to follow my analysis.</blockquote>

Simply but effectively told.]]></description>
<dc:subject>android mobile performance tuning smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:ecd3bcf44ae5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:mobile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:performance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:tuning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.asymco.com/2012/11/29/the-cost-of-selling-galaxies/">
    <title>The cost of selling Galaxies &gt;&gt; asymco</title>
    <dc:date>2012-11-29T19:23:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.asymco.com/2012/11/29/the-cost-of-selling-galaxies/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The chart above shows comparable ad spending from a cohort of technology companies as well as Coca Cola and Samsung Electronics.<p>

It might be surprising to note that Samsung spends considerably more than Apple and Microsoft. But it also spends more than Coca Cola, a company whose primary cost of sales is advertising.</blockquote>

Though the post doesn't mention this, Samsung probably spent somewhere north of $1bn on its Olympics sponsorship this year. Even so, when you look at its "marketing expenses", they total more than $8bn in each of the previous two years - and perhaps $11bn this year.

Apple spends around $1bn on marketing by the same comparator.]]></description>
<dc:subject>samsung smartphones apple marketing</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:29d3a62193ce/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:marketing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/2012/11/20/ntsb-iphone-blackberry/1717945/?dlvrit=110940">
    <title>NTSB follows TSA lead, drops BlackBerry &gt;&gt; USA Today</title>
    <dc:date>2012-11-22T22:16:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/2012/11/20/ntsb-iphone-blackberry/1717945/?dlvrit=110940</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Remember how the US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) is giving up BlackBerrys for iPhones? <blockquote>In addition to NTSB, which has about 400 workers, far larger organizations earlier shifted away from BlackBerry in recent months:<p>

• In October, the Defense Department requested a software contract to monitor security for mobile devices from Apple and Android, but not BlackBerry. The Defense Information Systems Agency program will initially support 162,500 devices and could ultimately support 8 million devices.<p>

• In September, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which had relied on BlackBerry for eight years, announced it was switching to iPhones for 17,676 users because BlackBerry could "no longer meet the mobile technology needs of the agency."<p>

• In May, the Transportation Security Administration, which had relied mainly on Microsoft Windows and BlackBerry devices, announced plans to spend $3m on Apple products to support its counter-terrorism mission.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>blackberry iphone enterprise smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:d1e59e14893f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:blackberry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:enterprise"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/11/in-a-nutshell-the-android-problem-totally-forked.php">
    <title>In a nutshell, the Android problem: totally forked &gt;&gt; John Battelle's Search BlogJohn Battelle's Search Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2012-11-22T12:41:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2012/11/in-a-nutshell-the-android-problem-totally-forked.php</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I’m a fan of “open.” Anyone who knows me, knows this about me.<p>

But I’m also a fan of “easy.” And of “good design.” So, for the past couple of years, I’ve been an iPhone user, mainly because it was easy, and had better design than any alternative. Also, my company supported the iPhone, even though it was terrible for calendar, contacts, email, you know, pretty much everything that mattered to me.<p>

But because I’m no longer day to day at my company, I’ve been eager to move away from the iPhone, for many reasons, including the extraordinarily awful experience I recently had, chronicled here.  And I really like the philosophy of Android. It’s open, it’s hackable, it’s generative in all the right ways.<p>

However, it’s also a utterly confusing mess. Alas, this seems to be the price of “open” – chaos.</blockquote>

He wants an Android phone, with one proviso: "once I buy it, I don’t want to spend three days figuring out how to make it work."]]></description>
<dc:subject>android google smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:bf37d5aa5d16/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/20/china-mobilesubscribers-idUSL3E8M90X420121120">
    <title>China's mobile subscribers up 1% in October at 1.09 bln &gt;&gt; Reuters</title>
    <dc:date>2012-11-20T22:47:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/20/china-mobilesubscribers-idUSL3E8M90X420121120</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>China, the world's largest mobile phone market by subscribers, posted a 1.04% monthly increase in the number of mobile subscribers to 1.09 billion in October, data from the country's three telecommunications operators showed.</blockquote>

Incredible; the China smartphone business is now bigger than that in Europe. (Not more valuable, but bigger.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>smartphones android</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:4e5fe86ceb90/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.businessinsider.com/apples-smartphone-market-share-2012-11">
    <title>This Trend Is Very Worrisome For Henry Blodget's Apple Prediction &gt;&gt; Business Insider</title>
    <dc:date>2012-11-20T10:05:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.businessinsider.com/apples-smartphone-market-share-2012-11</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Jay Yarow follows up on the previously-linked: <blockquote>My boss Henry Blodget says <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/mobile-market-share-2012-11">Apple should be worried about the fact that Android is racking up market share gains</a>.<p>
How worried should Apple really be about this market share dilemma? Probably not as worried as Blodget thinks.</blockquote>

Mum, Dad, stop fighting!]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple android smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:848eacfb4530/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/13/rims-chief-is-confident-of-blackberry-10-success/">
    <title>RIM's chief is confident of BlackBerry 10 success &gt;&gt; NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2012-11-15T22:19:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/13/rims-chief-is-confident-of-blackberry-10-success/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>It was clear from the presentation [in a meeting at the New York Times with reporters] that the [BB10] phone, which will have its debut on 30 Jan, will not introduce any significant hardware innovations. It has the rectangular slab look of smartphones already on the market.<p>

The hardware varies in the absence of a home button and the inclusion of a red LED light that flashes when a message comes in. According to earlier announcements by [Thorsten] Heins, RIM is also making a model with a physical keyboard.</blockquote>

Steady as she goes. Also: the description of BB10 makes it sound a lot like Windows Phone.]]></description>
<dc:subject>rim blackberry bb10 smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:6d6bb06f755c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:rim"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:blackberry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:bb10"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.asymco.com/2012/10/22/nokias-price-for-exclusivity/">
    <title>Nokia’s price for exclusivity &gt;&gt; asymco</title>
    <dc:date>2012-10-28T22:32:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.asymco.com/2012/10/22/nokias-price-for-exclusivity/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Remember the $1bn Nokia has received from Microsoft for Windows Phone, after killing Symbian? <blockquote>The foregone revenues from Symbian (assuming they had been able to maintain the decline to the level of 150m units that they had originally forecast) would be about $9bn. This means that had Nokia not knifed Symbian and had sold the shortfall units at an average price of $200 they would have received an additional $9bn in sales. Furthermore, assuming a margin of 33% for those units, Nokia received from Microsoft one third from of what she gave up for exclusivity.<p>

In other words, the net cost of the Microsoft exclusive relationship is at least $2bn in operating profit.<p>

This turns out to be the difference between being profitable and being distressed.</blockquote>

Utterly stunning. Nokia has in fact only sold 96m Symbian phones since announcing their end.]]></description>
<dc:subject>nokia smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:15a0101a7dd6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:nokia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20121017PD214.html">
    <title>Smartphones, tablets causing the IT supply chain to fall into imbalance &gt;&gt; Digitimes</title>
    <dc:date>2012-10-18T15:16:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20121017PD214.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The rapid growths of the smartphone and tablet markets have started to impact demand in other industries such as desktops, notebooks, and digital still cameras (DSC), while causing resources in the two markets to accumulate among only a few major vendors such as Apple and Samsung Electronics. Sources from the upstream supply chain are concerned that ecosystem is gradually turning to imbalance and will soon face a crisis for over relying on only a few clients.</blockquote>

Digitimes is getting all existential. But it's a valid point: in value terms, smartphones are rapidly overtaking PCs. And Samsung, which is the biggest in this market, doesn't give much value to outside contractors.]]></description>
<dc:subject>samsung apple smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:d029d5981292/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.reghardware.com/2012/10/17/slideshow_history_of_the_smartphone_in_20_handsets/">
    <title>Slideshow: A History of the Smartphone in 20 Handsets &gt;&gt; Reg Hardware</title>
    <dc:date>2012-10-17T16:43:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.reghardware.com/2012/10/17/slideshow_history_of_the_smartphone_in_20_handsets/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>With the news that world smartphone usage total has passed the billion mark in 20 years, we present 20 of the most important smartphones from the past 20 years.</blockquote>

Nice gallery. Wonderful what you can do when you're not constrained by having 350 words for a  print article. (Thanks @angusthebull for the link.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>smartphones history</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:98a7c878fa70/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:history"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57508093-94/the-ho-hum-era-of-smartphones-has-begun/">
    <title>The ho-hum era of smartphones has begun &gt;&gt; CNET News</title>
    <dc:date>2012-09-10T21:37:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57508093-94/the-ho-hum-era-of-smartphones-has-begun/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Stephen Shankland: <blockquote>There's a precedent here: personal computers. For years, it's been hard to stand out in that realm, with largely interchangeable designs made of of the same innards sourced from the same suppliers. Apple stands out for its sturdy laptops, slick track pad, and in-house operating system, but it's the exception that proves the rule for the much larger remainder of the market.<p>
Occasionally, dramatic change sweeps through the personal computer world, and I think Windows 8 and touch screens are driving one of those big changes now. It remains to be seen whether consumers will embrace the changes, of course, but there's no doubt many of next year's PCs will be very different from last year's PCs.<p>

But what's going to drive the next big change in mobile phones?</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>mobile smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:4f6fd64438d7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:mobile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20120907PB201.html">
    <title>HTC revenues down for fourth straight month in August</title>
    <dc:date>2012-09-10T09:41:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20120907PB201.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>HTC has reported revenues of NT$24.02bn (US$803.34m) for August 2012, down 4% sequentially and 47% on year. The data shows that HTC's revenues have been declining for four consecutive months.<p>

For the first eight months of 2012, revenues amounted to NT$207.87bn, decreasing 34.8% from a year earlier, according to a company filing with the Taiwan Stock Exchange (TSE).</blockquote>

Expects to break that in September following Asian launches, but this does not look healthy for HTC. Those are very large decreases in revenue in this market.]]></description>
<dc:subject>htc smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:d36c6966f7fa/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:htc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.fosspatents.com/2012/08/google-loses-leverage-as-motorola.html">
    <title>Google loses leverage as Motorola Mobility confirms German patent license to Apple &gt;&gt; FOSS Patents</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-30T09:45:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.fosspatents.com/2012/08/google-loses-leverage-as-motorola.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>In a filing made late on Monday (August 27, 2012) with the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, the Google subsidiary has now confirmed the recent conclusion of a standard-essential patent license agreement with Apple. Under the agreement, Apple is now licensed to use some if not all of Motorola's standard-essential patents in Germany, though the parties have not yet agreed on a FRAND royalty rate, which will ultimately have to be set by German courts unless they agree on a rate prior to its judicial determination.<p>

This is a very significant development because it means that Motorola Mobility will have to rely on non-standard-essential patents in its efforts to gain leverage over Apple. It is enforcing one such patent (one that covers push email notifications). With standard-essential patents, it appears that the only thing Google (Motorola) can do now against Apple in Germany is to push for as high a royalty rate as possible, but even in a hypothetical worst-case scenario to Apple, the limit will be the 2.25% rate that Motorola has been demanding for a long time.</blockquote>

Spotting that MMI has licensed the standards-essential patents requires a very careful reading of two different filings. Definitely correct, though. It would be useful to know how many of MMI's patents are FRAND, and how many non-FRAND.]]></description>
<dc:subject>google apple patents smartphones sep</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:3e5835eea97a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:sep"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.asymco.com/2012/08/28/deus-ex-machina/">
    <title>Avoiding Deus ex Machina &gt;&gt; asymco</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-28T16:49:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.asymco.com/2012/08/28/deus-ex-machina/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Horace Dediu: <blockquote>We are led to believe that the law is decisive, the ultimate adjudicator. The reason it isn’t is that the system was established in a different era. A time when technological change was slow, or non-existent. As a result the institutions of law move so slowly that they are nearly futile in administering justice or righting wrongs.…<p>

It’s a lottery at best, a time and money sink at worst. Considering the analogy to litigation as drama, I would re-phrase this caution as a warning not to treat litigation as Deus ex Machina. It’s not something that will get your business out of a jam or reward you for a violation, perceived or real.</blockquote>

An excellent counterpoint to all the other readings of That Trial.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple samsung ip patents smartphones charlesarthur</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:291c45c44c2a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.bloomberg.com/video/apple-jury-foreman-here-s-how-we-reached-a-verdict-RqtqHC25QbOBFg7xrWa5Wg.html">
    <title>Apple jury foreman: here's how we reached a verdict &gt;&gt; Bloomberg News video</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-28T16:14:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.bloomberg.com/video/apple-jury-foreman-here-s-how-we-reached-a-verdict-RqtqHC25QbOBFg7xrWa5Wg.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Velvin Hogan (yup) doesn't own any Apple products ("I'm a PC man"); none of the jury had an iPhone. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple samsung verdict jury foreman smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:b5d4dd4e483f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:verdict"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:jury"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:foreman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.visionmobile.com/blog/2012/06/report-developer-economics-2012-the-new-app-economy/">
    <title>[Report] Developer Economics 2012 – The new app economy &gt;&gt; VisionMobile</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-27T20:11:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.visionmobile.com/blog/2012/06/report-developer-economics-2012-the-new-app-economy/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Windows Phone is the new cool. While Windows Phone sales continue to disappoint, a year on, with 2.6m devices sold in Q1 2012, interest among developers continues to build up. Our survey of 1,500 developers indicated that, irrespective of which platform they currently use most, the majority of developers (57%) plan to adopt Windows Phone.</blockquote>

They're meanwhile abandoning BlackBerryOS and Bada, according to the survey. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>windowsphone smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:198c7cd612ea/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:windowsphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://techpinions.com/of-apple-samsung-and-obviousness/9304">
    <title>Of Apple, Samsung, and obviousness &gt;&gt; TechPinions</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-27T16:47:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://techpinions.com/of-apple-samsung-and-obviousness/9304</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Veteran tech reporter Steve Wildstrom, some morning coffee, and a paraphrase from The Social Network.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple samsung smartphones ip charlesarthur</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:a182a57edaf2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/opinon/2012/08/133_118242.html">
    <title>Samsung scrambles to recover after uppercut &gt;&gt; Korea Times</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-27T14:15:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/opinon/2012/08/133_118242.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Samsung executives were still reeling in shock Sunday, but provided no clear hint on the company’s next move in the showdown with its industry archrival. It’s widely expected that Samsung will appeal, but the outlook for success in the appeal now looks rather murky.<p>

"It’s absolutely the worst scenario for us," a senior Samsung executive said as he rushed into the company’s compound in southern Seoul.<p>

Inside the building, Choi Gee-sung, former Samsung Electronics CEO and now the head of Samsung Group’s corporate strategy division, was holding an emergency meeting attended by Shin Jong-kyun, the company’s mobile devices chief, and Lee Don-joo, lead marketing official.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple samsung smartphones ip patents</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:04e42796645e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://gigaom.com/2012/08/25/counterintuitive-did-samsung-emerge-a-winner/">
    <title>Counterintuitive: Did Samsung emerge a winner? &gt;&gt; GigaOm</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-26T20:59:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://gigaom.com/2012/08/25/counterintuitive-did-samsung-emerge-a-winner/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>In a <a href="https://plus.google.com/111091089527727420853/posts">blog post</a>, Robert Scoble said while Samsung will take a big PR hit and lose $1 billion, it was worth it to copy Apple because it vaulted the company ahead of other smartphone rivals. Samsung also sells an array of products that Apple doesn’t and setting up the comparison with Apple worked out well for the entire company, Scoble said.<p>

“It only cost $1 billion to become the #2 most profitable mobile company. Remember how much Microsoft paid for Skype? $8 billion. So, for 1/8th of a Skype Samsung took RIM’s place and kicked HTC’s behind…I bet that RIM wishes it had copied the iPhone a lot sooner than it did. So does Nokia, I bet. Samsung is a much healthier company than any of those BECAUSE it copied the iPhone,” he wrote.<p>

Analyst Jeremiah Owyang, of Altimeter Group, <a href=""https://plus.google.com/111654284395316165338/posts">agreed</a> saying Samsung still comes out ahead despite the potential ban on sales and punishment. He said Samsung does $1 billion in revenue every 2.4 days.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple samsung patents smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:d5ab43577aca/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57500358-37/exclusive-apple-samsung-juror-speaks-out/">
    <title>Exclusive: Apple-Samsung juror speaks out &gt;&gt; CNET News</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-25T22:21:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57500358-37/exclusive-apple-samsung-juror-speaks-out/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Great exclusive for Greg Sandoval: <blockquote>Apple v. Samsung juror Manuel Ilagan said the nine-person jury that heard the patent infringement case between the companies knew after the first day that it believed Samsung had wronged Apple.<p>
Ilagan told CNET in an exclusive interview that the jury had several sometimes "heated" debates before reaching its verdict yesterday. He also said nothing in the deliberation process was rushed and that the jury carefully weighed the evidence.<p>
"We found for Apple because of the evidence they presented," Ilagan said. "It was clear there was infringement…What was happening was that the appearance [of Samsung's phone] was their downfall. You copied the appearance.... Nokia is still selling phones. BlackBerry is selling phones. Those phones aren't infringing. There are alternatives out there.""</blockquote>

Worth reading in full as an insight into the jury's deliberations.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple samsung ip patent smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:67e292e7235a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:patent"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://pandodaily.com/2012/08/25/copying-works-how-samsungs-decision-to-mimic-apple-paid-off-in-spades/">
    <title>Copying Works: how Samsung’s decision to mimic Apple paid off in spades &gt;&gt; PandoDaily</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-25T21:50:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://pandodaily.com/2012/08/25/copying-works-how-samsungs-decision-to-mimic-apple-paid-off-in-spades/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Farhad Manjoo: <blockquote>On Friday, a federal jury decided that Samsung was guilty of doing [copying Apple]. But you don’t need this decision, nor any of the damning internal documents uncovered during the patent case, to realize this. Just look at the devices Samsung released in response to the iPhone – for instance, the 2010 Galaxy S, pictured above. If that’s not copying, the term has no meaning.<p>

It’s tempting, after such a sweeping verdict in Apple’s favor, to conclude that Samsung’s decision to mimic the iPhone was a terrible mistake. The firm will now be on the hook for at least $1bn in damages, and the judge could triple that amount. Samsung will likely face sales injunctions on many of its products, and will be forced to quickly design around Apple’s patents in its current and upcoming devices, if not to pay a steep licensing fee. Other companies that took inspiration from Apple - including Motorola, HTC and, at the top of the chain, Google - will also be stung by this decision.<p>

But if you study what’s happened in the mobile industry since 2007, a different moral emerges. It goes like this: Copying works.</blockquote>

Compared to RIM or Nokia's choices, you'd have to say it worked for Samsung. And later in the piece: <blockquote>Samsung’s decision to copy Apple has also been inarguably good for consumers. If it weren’t for Samsung and Google, Apple would have faced no meaningful competition in smartphones—which would have been great for Apple shareholders but terrible for everyone else, including for Apple’s customers.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>samsung apple patents smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:68716d3789e6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/News/Press/201208/12-0823E/index.html">
    <title>Sony Mobile Communications announces new operational structure and reduction in workforce &gt;&gt; Sony</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-23T21:09:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/News/Press/201208/12-0823E/index.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Sony Mobile plans to reduce its global headcount by approximately 15% (approximately 1000 personnel, including consultants) throughout the financial years of 2012 and 2013 (i.e. by the end of March 2014) as the company seeks to increase operational efficiency, reduce costs and drive profitable growth.<p>

Today Sony Mobile filed a redundancy notification (“varsel”) with the Swedish authorities to notify them that the company expects around 650 employees across a number of functions at Sony Mobile in Lund to be affected by job closures. The remaining headcount reductions will be primarily consultants in Sweden. Lund will continue to be an important strategic site for Sony Mobile, with the main focus on software and application development.</blockquote>

The company headquarters are moving from Lund to Tokyo.]]></description>
<dc:subject>sony mobile smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:55adc28d0995/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:sony"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:mobile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.computerweekly.com/news/2240161778/RIM-to-lose-stranglehold-on-government-mobile-market">
    <title>RIM set to lose stranglehold on government mobile market &gt;&gt; Computer Weekly</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-22T21:03:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/news/2240161778/RIM-to-lose-stranglehold-on-government-mobile-market</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>A government document seen by Computer Weekly stressed the importance of using appropriate commercial products to enable remote working in government at T1. This could include a greater use of consumer devices such as the iPhone and Samsung and HTC handsets.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>smartphones mobilephones apple samsung government</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:c7fe40e62f30/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:mobilephones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:government"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-22/china-telecom-net-falls-10-on-iphone-costs-beating-estimates.html?cmpid=yhoo">
    <title>China Telecom profit beats estimates as IPhone lures users &gt;&gt; Bloomberg</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-22T21:01:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-22/china-telecom-net-falls-10-on-iphone-costs-beating-estimates.html?cmpid=yhoo</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>“It looks like the negative impact of iPhone subsidies was not as strong as people expected in the quarter, and average revenue per user was higher than we expected,” said Marvin Lo, a Hong Kong-based analyst at Mizuho Securities. “The rising iPhone and smartphone penetration helped increase” average revenue per user, he said.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>iphone china smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:90ec19b53847/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.geekwire.com/2012/red-blue-samsung-iphone-map-oddly-familiar/">
    <title>Phones or politics? This Samsung vs. Apple map looks familiar &gt;&gt; GeekWire</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-14T15:26:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.geekwire.com/2012/red-blue-samsung-iphone-map-oddly-familiar/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>An exhibit that surfaced yesterday in the Apple vs. Samsung patent trial showed where the Apple brand is strongest, and how the launch of the Samsung Galaxy Android phone affected that standing, based on an internal Samsung marketing study.
AllThingsD posted the map Monday evening, and we couldn’t help but wonder how it compared to a different map that we’ll be seeing a lot of this fall — the Electoral College breakdown in the U.S. Presidential race.</blockquote>

There is, indeed, a peculiar similarity.]]></description>
<dc:subject>android google smartphones iphone apple charlesarthur</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:dfacdd0cd423/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1288776/000119312512350915/d396979d8k.htm">
    <title>Google: formal statement on cutting 4,000 Motorola jobs &gt;&gt; SEC</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-13T11:24:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1288776/000119312512350915/d396979d8k.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Google expects to incur a severance-related charge of no greater than $275 million, which it believes will be largely recognized in the third quarter, with the remaining severance-related costs recognized by the end of 2012. Google also expects to incur other restructuring charges related to the actions described above, the majority of which will be recognized in the third quarter. Although Google cannot currently predict the amount of these other charges at this time, these additional charges could be significant.</blockquote>

Offers please on how much "significant" will turn out to be.]]></description>
<dc:subject>google motorola smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:6909f9ae47de/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:motorola"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.ben-evans.com/post/29128523767/a-first-look-at-samsungs-us-android-business">
    <title>A first look at Samsung's US Android business &gt;&gt; Benedict Evans</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-10T16:20:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ben-evans.com/post/29128523767/a-first-look-at-samsungs-us-android-business</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Some nifty graphs here (the Apple-Samsung court case has been both a boon and a challenge to analysts to find new ways to represent data.) The conclusion: <blockquote>In effect, Samsung, as Nokia used to do, is running a broad portfolio strategy, moving multiple handsets in out of the market almost every quarter. The prominent messaging around the Galaxy S2 and S3 (the latter isn’t captured in the data Samsung disclosure) belies a much broader product offer.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>samsung apple smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:d1c101df4653/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.bgr.com/2012/08/09/htc-criticism-2012-apple-samsung-competition/">
    <title>Apple, Samsung competition has HTC in Hell &gt;&gt; BGR</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-09T20:52:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.bgr.com/2012/08/09/htc-criticism-2012-apple-samsung-competition/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Tero Kuittinen: <blockquote>This may seem like a distant memory, but in the spring of 2010, Samsung and LG were neck and neck in the US handset market. Each possessed 22% of the market. Over the following two years, LG tried to copy every move Samsung made, without trying to create any distinction between the brands. Samsung’s superior display technology and slightly better hardware build demolished its South Korean rival.<p>

HTC learned nothing of this episode — on the contrary, it has rushed to repeat LG’s mistakes with an eerie precision.<p>

HTC is guilty of a great folly by refusing to learn from LG’s downfall.</blockquote>

Kuittinen is an astute observer of this sector. Is it a Finnish trait?]]></description>
<dc:subject>htc smartphones charlesarthur</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:764b76fcfe0a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:htc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.asymco.com/2012/08/06/how-many-of-the-next-generation-of-iphone-will-be-sold/">
    <title>How many iPhone “5″s will be sold? &gt;&gt; asymco</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-06T12:39:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.asymco.com/2012/08/06/how-many-of-the-next-generation-of-iphone-will-be-sold/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Horace Dediu estimates that Apple is likely to sell 250 million iPhone 5s.]]></description>
<dc:subject>iphone iphone5 apple smartphones asymco joshhalliday</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:351f70ab8024/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone5"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:asymco"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:joshhalliday"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://techcrunch.com/2012/08/02/canalys-q2-68-of-all-smartphones-shipped-were-android-chinas-the-biggest-market-by-a-wide-margin/">
    <title>Canalys Q2: 68% Of All Smartphones Shipped Were Android; China’s The Biggest Market By A Wide Margin &gt;&gt; TechCrunch</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-02T10:40:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://techcrunch.com/2012/08/02/canalys-q2-68-of-all-smartphones-shipped-were-android-chinas-the-biggest-market-by-a-wide-margin/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[From Canalys:

China had “phenomenal” growth this year, Canalys says, and that’s no understatemet. Some 42 million smartphones were shipped in China in Q2, which works out to growth of 199% over last year (and 32% over Q1). By comparison, smartphone sales worldwide grew by only 47%, says Canalys. In other words, China grew at a rate more than four times that of the rest of the world. China, it says, accounted for 27% of the world’s smartphone shipments, with number-two U.S. at 16%.]]></description>
<dc:subject>china smartphones joshhalliday</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:7063a5c28806/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:joshhalliday"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://twitter.com/asymco/statuses/230636183426830336">
    <title>Smartphones mix: &gt;&gt; Twitter / asymco</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-01T12:09:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://twitter.com/asymco/statuses/230636183426830336</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Horace Dediu:

Smartphones mix: Samsung now at 54%. Two years ago they were at 3%. Nokia now at 12%. Two years ago they were at 22%.]]></description>
<dc:subject>smartphones joshhalliday</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:2003549a8784/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:joshhalliday"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-22/samsung-and-apple-global-patent-fight-moves-to-australia-trial.html">
    <title>Australia judge calls Apple-Samsung dispute over 3G ‘ridiculous’ &gt;&gt; Bloomberg</title>
    <dc:date>2012-07-23T21:08:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-22/samsung-and-apple-global-patent-fight-moves-to-australia-trial.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Apple refused to pay a license fee for the technology that allows phones to conduct multiple tasks including taking calls while uploading photos to the Internet, Samsung’s lawyer Neil Young said at the start of the trial. Apple was willing to pay and Samsung refused, the Cupertino, California-based company’s lawyer Stephen Burley said.<p>
“Why on earth are these proceedings going ahead?” Bennett asked the lawyers in court today. “It’s just ridiculous.” A similar dispute between any other two companies would be immediately ordered to mediation, she said.<p>
“Why shouldn’t I order the parties to mediation?” she asked. She said she would expect an answer before the end of the week.</blockquote>

They simply won't stop, and there doesn't seem to be anything anyone can do to make them stop.]]></description>
<dc:subject>samsung apple smartphones mobilephones patents</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:58c25f5a40e2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:mobilephones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.htc.com/2012/03/ics/">
    <title>HTC devices getting Android 4.0, Ice Cream Sandwich Updates &gt;&gt; HTC</title>
    <dc:date>2012-07-22T21:00:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.htc.com/2012/03/ics/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[It's a long list, though oddly it excludes the HTC Desire HD, which gets this "explanation": <blockquote>After extensive testing, we’ve determined that the current version of HTC Sense with Android provides customers with the best experience on the HTC Desire HD. When we consider new versions of software, we weigh a number of factors, but ultimately the customer experience on the product is the deciding factor.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>android htc smartphones mobilephones charlesarthur</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:03c637fb4935/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:htc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:mobilephones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theverge.com/2012/7/21/3174432/beats-buys-back-controlling-interest-from-htc">
    <title>Beats buys back controlling interest from HTC, mobile exclusivity to continue &gt;&gt; The Verge</title>
    <dc:date>2012-07-21T21:47:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theverge.com/2012/7/21/3174432/beats-buys-back-controlling-interest-from-htc</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>[In August] Last year HTC made waves when it spent $300m to acquire a majority stake in audio brand Beats — but things have new flipped back around, with HTC announcing that it sold 25% of Beats' shares back to the audio manufacturer for $150m.</blockquote>

Turns out people won't select a smartphone principally on its promised audio quality. HTC is probably glad of the money now.]]></description>
<dc:subject>htc smartphones audio beats</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:2bcd7496984c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:htc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:audio"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:beats"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://karan301.tumblr.com/post/27551598600/what-is-the-future-of-the-iphone-3gs">
    <title>What is the future of the iPhone 3GS? &gt;&gt; The Tech Blog, Ghana</title>
    <dc:date>2012-07-19T21:13:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://karan301.tumblr.com/post/27551598600/what-is-the-future-of-the-iphone-3gs</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Matt Panzarino of The Next Web suggested this: <blockquote>But, if the prices were right, Apple could expand the 3GS from a contract device to an off-contract pre-paid model that might finally give the company a horse in the developing nations race.’</blockquote>

Which drew this response: <blockquote>This would be of huge benefit to Apple. Speaking from Ghana (West Africa), I know hundreds of people who have iPhones but use either the GEVEY SIM or ultrasn0w method to unlock their iPhone for it to work here.</blockquote>

We don't hear enough about how smartphones are changing developing nations. But they are.]]></description>
<dc:subject>smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:dcbfca72f830/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thenextweb.com/2012/07/18/apple-adds-uniqueidentifier-to-in-app-purchase-receipts-not-udid-may-be-related-to-recent-breach/">
    <title>Apple adds unique identifier field to in-app purchase receipts &gt;&gt; TheNextWeb</title>
    <dc:date>2012-07-18T20:59:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://thenextweb.com/2012/07/18/apple-adds-uniqueidentifier-to-in-app-purchase-receipts-not-udid-may-be-related-to-recent-breach/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Since the change, which Macrumors says developers noticed as of today, comes in close proximity to the hack, it’s definitely possible that the two are related, but this identifier won’t do anything to prevent the hack as it stands. Apps will have to be updated to check the value, first and foremost, but proactive receipt validation with Apple’s servers that checks agains the ‘unique_identifier’ value is the only way this is going to do anything real from preventing a hack like this from happening again.</blockquote>

That's a lot of apps to update.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple ios smartphones mobile charlesarthur</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:9d9c4e78496e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ios"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:mobile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/12/07/17/0024240/it-costs-450-in-marketing-to-make-someone-buy-a-49-nokia-lumia">
    <title>Here's a list of what Windows Phone lacks. What's the overlap with the iPhone?</title>
    <dc:date>2012-07-17T11:29:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/12/07/17/0024240/it-costs-450-in-marketing-to-make-someone-buy-a-49-nokia-lumia</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Ignore the post at the top (which kicks it off) about the marketing cost of a Lumia v the upfront cost, and consider the list that appears a couple of lines down suggesting 121 (count 'em!) reasons why Nokia's Lumia 900 has "failed". One of them is "generally force[s] users to use IE, Bing and SkyDrive", so as lists go.. The question is, though, how many of these could you find for the iPhone? (And Android phones?)]]></description>
<dc:subject>iphone windowsphone smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:29ba87d63903/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:windowsphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/12/07/09/chinas_smartphone_market_grows_164_apples_ios_takes_173_share.html">
    <title>China's smartphone market grows 164%, Apple's iOS takes 17.3% share &gt;&gt; AppleInsider</title>
    <dc:date>2012-07-15T21:11:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/12/07/09/chinas_smartphone_market_grows_164_apples_ios_takes_173_share.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Even without availability on China's largest mobile provider, the iPhone's market share in China has grown form 9.9% a year ago to 17.3% in the June quarter.<p>

Needham & Company analyst Charlie Wolf's quarterly report on the smartphone industry was issued on Monday, and identified the "big news" of the quarter as the emergence of China as the leading smartphone market. Smartphone shipments in China grew 164% year over year to 33.1m units in the June quarter, topping the 25m units sold in the US.</blockquote>

Android share: 69.5% (so Android is outselling iPhone 4:1). That leaves 12.6% for all other platforms.]]></description>
<dc:subject>china ios apple iphone android smartphones</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:fdc36c406733/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ios"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphones"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>