<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (guardiantech)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from guardiantech</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.technet.com/b/microsoft_blog/archive/2013/08/27/on-dickens-rashomon-and-twitter.aspx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://newsroom.intel.com/community/intel_newsroom/blog/2012/09/26/intel-statement-in-response-to-unsubstantiated-news-reports"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HSbhyaH0vw&amp;feature=youtu.be"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://conversations.nokia.com/2012/09/06/an-apology-is-due/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.adrianshort.co.uk/2012/06/15/how-not-to-write-a-press-release-argyll-and-bute-council-style/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.zdnet.co.uk/blogs/jacks-blog-10017212/apple-briefs-bloggers-blanks-new-york-times-10025445/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/02/16/apple-public-relations-new-media-pecking-order/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://searchengineland.com/examining-facebooks-smear-campaign-concerns-about-google-social-circles-76914"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://blogs.technet.com/b/microsoft_blog/archive/2013/08/27/on-dickens-rashomon-and-twitter.aspx">
    <title>On Dickens, Rashomon and Twitter &gt;&gt; The Official Microsoft Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2013-08-28T06:06:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/microsoft_blog/archive/2013/08/27/on-dickens-rashomon-and-twitter.aspx</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Frank X. Shaw is head of Microsoft PR, and isn't enamoured of some of the coverage of Steve Ballmer's decision to go: <blockquote>Study after study shows we tend to focus on facts that support our beliefs, and ignore those that don’t fit neatly.<p>

In research, this is known as confirmation bias, and it’s a very hard thing to overcome, even when you are aware of it.<p>

So, if you really want to understand what’s going on with a category as complex as the one we operate in, you’ve got your work cut out for you.<p>

In that spirit, there have been a few common themes in some of the coverage I’ve seen since Friday that are worth taking a moment to dissect and discuss.<p>

One approach has been to focus exclusively on some of our consumer businesses, and then judge us harshly while ignoring the successes we’ve had elsewhere.<p>

Another approach has been to go a step further, criticize our lack of “focus” and suggest that those other successes are actually a distraction from what they believe should be our single priority.<p>

What these themes reveal is a single narrow frame through which the writers and pundits view the industry itself that leads them to reach these conclusions.<p>

Since we have a different perspective that drives our strategy, we naturally see things differently.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft pr</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:21494bf0477a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:pr"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://newsroom.intel.com/community/intel_newsroom/blog/2012/09/26/intel-statement-in-response-to-unsubstantiated-news-reports">
    <title>Intel Statement in Response to Unsubstantiated News Reports &gt;&gt; Intel newsroom</title>
    <dc:date>2012-09-27T15:07:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://newsroom.intel.com/community/intel_newsroom/blog/2012/09/26/intel-statement-in-response-to-unsubstantiated-news-reports</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Today Intel Corporation issued a statement in response to unsubstantiated news reports about comments made by Intel CEO Paul Otellini in a meeting with employees.</blockquote>

The statement that follows completely fails to repudiate, refute or rebut the suggestion that Otellini did indeed say the things ascribed to him (to paraphrase, that he thought Windows 8 was shipping with too many fixes remaining to be done). It just says Intel and Microsoft have worked together a long time. That feels like at least halfway to confirmation.]]></description>
<dc:subject>intel pr</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:64f009ab0a2e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:intel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:pr"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HSbhyaH0vw&amp;feature=youtu.be">
    <title>OIS on Nokia Lumia 920 &gt;&gt; YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2012-09-06T21:32:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HSbhyaH0vw&amp;feature=youtu.be</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Nokia showing its image stabilisation. Honestly.]]></description>
<dc:subject>nokia pr</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:46112182c250/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:nokia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:pr"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://conversations.nokia.com/2012/09/06/an-apology-is-due/">
    <title>An apology is due &gt;&gt; Nokia Conversations</title>
    <dc:date>2012-09-06T21:31:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://conversations.nokia.com/2012/09/06/an-apology-is-due/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The official Nokia blog: <blockquote>We’re excited about the Lumia 920 and the ground-breaking PureView imaging capabilities we announced today.<p>

In an effort to demonstrate the benefits of optical image stabilization (which eliminates blurry images and improves pictures shot in low light conditions), we produced a video that simulates what we will be able to deliver with OIS.<p>

Of course, hindsight is 20/20, but we should have posted a disclaimer stating this was a representation of OIS only. This was not shot with a Lumia 920. At least, not yet. We apologize for the confusion we created.</blockquote>

One suspects cock-up rather than conspiracy. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>nokia lumia pr</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:5510cfd26a4e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:nokia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:lumia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:pr"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.adrianshort.co.uk/2012/06/15/how-not-to-write-a-press-release-argyll-and-bute-council-style/">
    <title>How not to write a press release, Argyll and Bute Council style &gt;&gt; Adrian Short</title>
    <dc:date>2012-06-15T14:40:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.adrianshort.co.uk/2012/06/15/how-not-to-write-a-press-release-argyll-and-bute-council-style/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Someone had to take the council's weaselly words apart. Adrian Short has done it for you. Enjoy.]]></description>
<dc:subject>pr charlesarthur</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:19569db15820/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:pr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.zdnet.co.uk/blogs/jacks-blog-10017212/apple-briefs-bloggers-blanks-new-york-times-10025445/">
    <title>Apple briefs bloggers, blanks New York Times &gt;&gt; ZDNet UK</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-20T16:32:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.zdnet.co.uk/blogs/jacks-blog-10017212/apple-briefs-bloggers-blanks-new-york-times-10025445/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Although John Gruber says that the NYT's David Pogue was in line for a briefing when he was there. Still, the pecking order exists.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple pr joshhalliday</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:a301a2a3caf5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:pr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:joshhalliday"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/02/16/apple-public-relations-new-media-pecking-order/">
    <title>Apple public relations' new media pecking order &gt;&gt; Fortune Tech CNN</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-20T16:28:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/02/16/apple-public-relations-new-media-pecking-order/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[And ... wait for it ... where are Europe/UK news outlets? Oh.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple pr joshhalliday</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:608da51b5744/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:pr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:joshhalliday"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://searchengineland.com/examining-facebooks-smear-campaign-concerns-about-google-social-circles-76914">
    <title>Examining Facebook’s “Smear Campaign” Concerns About Google Social Circles &gt;&gt; Search Engine Land</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-13T07:32:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://searchengineland.com/examining-facebooks-smear-campaign-concerns-about-google-social-circles-76914</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Danny Sullivan does due diligence on Facebook's dirty tricks campaign against Google. Did the social network have a point? "I can’t see that Google is using any information in Google Social Search from Facebook," he says. Over to you, Facebook.]]></description>
<dc:subject>facebook google bursonmarsteller pr</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:0fe307585b2f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:bursonmarsteller"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:pr"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>