<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (guardiantech)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from guardiantech</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://money.cnn.com/2014/05/22/technology/security/nsa-obama-blackberry/index.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/06/06/2118531/direct-access-nsa-spying/?mobile=nc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2012/11/why_romney_was_surprised_to_lose_his_campaign_had_the_wrong_numbers_bad.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://edition.cnn.com/2012/11/13/tech/innovation/obama-tech-policy/index.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://kotaku.com/5958541/hundreds-of-obamas-and-romneys-go-to-war-in-this-hilarious+looking-mod"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://flowingdata.com/2012/11/05/all-possible-paths-to-the-white-house/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.tnr.com/blog/plank/106724/how-i-learned-stop-worrying-and-love-romneyworld"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.flickr.com/photos/whitehouse/5680724572/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.zdnet.co.uk/blogs/mixed-signals-10000051/how-obama-watched-the-bin-laden-mission-10022338/"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://money.cnn.com/2014/05/22/technology/security/nsa-obama-blackberry/index.html">
    <title>NSA engineer: 'I made Obama's BlackBerry' &gt;&gt; CNN Money</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-26T19:20:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://money.cnn.com/2014/05/22/technology/security/nsa-obama-blackberry/index.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>In response to Obama's request, the NSA set up a lab where dozens of experts performed surgery for several months on a high-profile patient: the soon-to-be presidential BlackBerry. The course of treatment was to manipulate the device's innards to weed out potential threats to secure communication.

In the end, that meant taking most of the fun out of the phone: the president can't play Angry Birds, for example.

"You try to get rid of any functionality that's not really required. Every piece of functionality is an opportunity for the adversary," [former NSA technical director Richard] George says.

According to George, the president simply wanted a phone that enabled him to communicate with his advisers. Though the president was a well known BlackBerry addict at the time, the choice of smartphone model was the NSA's, not Obama's, George explained.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>blackberry obama nsa</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:b4dea56f79b7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:blackberry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:obama"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:nsa"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/06/06/2118531/direct-access-nsa-spying/?mobile=nc">
    <title>Why the tech company 'denials' don't necessarily mean they weren't cooperating with NSA spying &gt;&gt; ThinkProgress</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-07T21:27:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/06/06/2118531/direct-access-nsa-spying/?mobile=nc</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Following reports of a top secret program called PRISM that allows intelligence agencies to access a wide variety of supposedly private online communications, several of the tech companies implicated in the report have issued carefully worded statements denying the government has access to their servers or a backdoor method of entry. But that doesn’t necessarily mean the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) don’t have the ability to access their data.</blockquote>

It's all in the wording.]]></description>
<dc:subject>obama surveillance</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:0966b25359cb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:obama"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:surveillance"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2012/11/why_romney_was_surprised_to_lose_his_campaign_had_the_wrong_numbers_bad.html">
    <title>Why Romney was surprised to lose: His campaign had the wrong numbers, bad assumptions, and underestimated Barack Obama’s campaign team &gt;&gt; Slate Magazine</title>
    <dc:date>2012-11-16T06:19:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2012/11/why_romney_was_surprised_to_lose_his_campaign_had_the_wrong_numbers_bad.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The final problem: <blockquote>On Election Day, the whole Romney ground-game flopped apart. ORCA, the much touted- computer system for tracking voters on Election Day, collapsed. It was supposed to be a high-tech approach to poll-watching, a system by which campaign workers would be able to track who voted. Those who had not yet voted could therefore be identified and then have volunteers tasked to finding them and getting them to the polls. ORCA was supposed to streamline the process, but it was never stress-tested. Field operatives never saw a beta version. They asked to see it, but were told it would be ready on Election Day. When they rolled it out Tuesday, it was a mess. People couldn’t log on and when they did, the fields that were supposed to be full of data were empty.</blockquote>

Lesson in there somewhere.]]></description>
<dc:subject>obama romney uselection</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:6e330b49c485/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:obama"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:romney"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:uselection"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://edition.cnn.com/2012/11/13/tech/innovation/obama-tech-policy/index.html">
    <title>5 big tech issues await Obama in second term &gt;&gt; CNN.com</title>
    <dc:date>2012-11-15T17:35:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://edition.cnn.com/2012/11/13/tech/innovation/obama-tech-policy/index.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Technology policy didn't get much airtime in the 2012 presidential election, but the Obama administration will face serious issues over the next four years.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>obama us tech</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:57fdf100513f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:obama"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:tech"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://kotaku.com/5958541/hundreds-of-obamas-and-romneys-go-to-war-in-this-hilarious+looking-mod">
    <title>Hundreds of Obamas and Romneys go to war in this ridiculous-looking mod &gt;&gt; Kotaku</title>
    <dc:date>2012-11-07T22:24:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://kotaku.com/5958541/hundreds-of-obamas-and-romneys-go-to-war-in-this-hilarious+looking-mod</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The mod, created by Reddit user matbitesdog, is used in Medieval II: Total War, and you can download it for laughs <a href="http://www.twcenter.net/forums/downloads.php?do=file&id=3877">here</a>.</blockquote>

Enjoy the pics. Perhaps future elections could be fought like this too?]]></description>
<dc:subject>obama war mod games</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:5709cf170007/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:obama"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:mod"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:games"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://flowingdata.com/2012/11/05/all-possible-paths-to-the-white-house/">
    <title>All possible paths to the White House &gt;&gt;Flowing Data</title>
    <dc:date>2012-11-05T12:24:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://flowingdata.com/2012/11/05/all-possible-paths-to-the-white-house/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Pointing to a New York Times story about how Obama's and Romney's "paths" compare: if one wins state X and the other wins state Y, how decisive is Y? To quote the original article, "Obama has 431 ways to win, Romney has 76 ways to win". What's clever is the use of data and visualisation as a means to consider the path to the result.]]></description>
<dc:subject>obama romney election</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:99cf002ea269/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:obama"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:romney"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:election"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.tnr.com/blog/plank/106724/how-i-learned-stop-worrying-and-love-romneyworld">
    <title>Stop worrying about the Romney campaign's erasing whole lines from Obama's &quot;You Didn't Build That&quot; riff. They simply disappeared &gt;&gt; The New Republic</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-30T17:55:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.tnr.com/blog/plank/106724/how-i-learned-stop-worrying-and-love-romneyworld</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Alex MacGillis: <blockquote>this brazen editing of Obama's riff seemed very much in keeping with the Romney campaign's equally brazen declaration that the Obama administration is doing away with the welfare work requirement.</blockquote>

Filter bubbles in politics are arguably far more dangerous than those in technology.]]></description>
<dc:subject>obama romney distortion filterbubble</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:37e863686840/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:obama"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:romney"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:distortion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:filterbubble"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.flickr.com/photos/whitehouse/5680724572/">
    <title>Obama receiving update on bin Laden mission &gt;&gt; Flickr</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-02T22:10:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.flickr.com/photos/whitehouse/5680724572/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The expressions on the faces tell so much - Obama and Clinton particularly.]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlesarthur historic binladen obama</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:aecb07729645/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:historic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:binladen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:obama"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.zdnet.co.uk/blogs/mixed-signals-10000051/how-obama-watched-the-bin-laden-mission-10022338/">
    <title>How Obama watched the Bin Laden mission &gt;&gt; ZDNet UK</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-02T22:07:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.zdnet.co.uk/blogs/mixed-signals-10000051/how-obama-watched-the-bin-laden-mission-10022338/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Fascinating: basically, lots of video over super-secure links. But the detail is really good here.]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlesarthur osama obama</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:74402b97acb2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:osama"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:obama"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>