<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (guardiantech)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from guardiantech</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444246904577575351814047494.html?mod=wsj_share_tweet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.businessinsider.com/exclusive-the-im-conversation-in-which-19-year-old-zuckerberg-decided-to-build-facebook-this-years-100-billion-ipo-2012-1?op=1"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://techcrunch.com/2011/11/28/ipo-risks/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://chill.com/blog/2011/08/chilling/our-response-to-mark-zuckerberg-2/"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444246904577575351814047494.html?mod=wsj_share_tweet">
    <title>Inside Facebook's Push to Woo Big Advertisers &gt;&gt; WSJ.com</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-15T14:40:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444246904577575351814047494.html?mod=wsj_share_tweet</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>As the ad types peppered the young chief executive officer with questions, a theme emerged. If they committed to spending big bucks with Facebook, how could they be assured a return on their investment?

Mr. Zuckerberg's response, according to one of the attendees: "That's a great question and we should probably have an answer to that, shouldn't we?"</blockquote> ]]></description>
<dc:subject>facebook advertising markzuckerberg joshhalliday</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:eff069e52fc4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:advertising"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:markzuckerberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:joshhalliday"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.businessinsider.com/exclusive-the-im-conversation-in-which-19-year-old-zuckerberg-decided-to-build-facebook-this-years-100-billion-ipo-2012-1?op=1">
    <title>The IM Conversation In Which 19-Year-Old Zuckerberg Decided To Build Facebook, This Year's $100 Billion IPO &gt;&gt; Business Insider</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-01T08:12:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.businessinsider.com/exclusive-the-im-conversation-in-which-19-year-old-zuckerberg-decided-to-build-facebook-this-years-100-billion-ipo-2012-1?op=1</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[You can just hear Zuckerberg's machine gunfire elocution.]]></description>
<dc:subject>markzuckerberg facebook ipo joshhalliday</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:126c7cae613c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:markzuckerberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ipo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:joshhalliday"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://techcrunch.com/2011/11/28/ipo-risks/">
    <title>Why Greedy Stockholders and A $100 Billion IPO Could Hurt Facebook &gt;&gt; TechCrunch</title>
    <dc:date>2011-11-29T07:39:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://techcrunch.com/2011/11/28/ipo-risks/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Most people don’t get just how long-term Facebook is thinking. Many of its product decisions cause public unrest because Facebook is planning for 3, 5 or 10 years from now, even if that means making people uncomfortable today. Users weren’t ready for the news feed when it launched, now it’s beloved. Frictionless sharing and Sponsored Stories could be seen as scary re-appropriations of user actions, but social ads and publishing our offline and off-site activity are where the future is headed."]]></description>
<dc:subject>facebook ipo markzuckerberg joshhalliday</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:fb4e8a554a83/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ipo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:markzuckerberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:joshhalliday"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://chill.com/blog/2011/08/chilling/our-response-to-mark-zuckerberg-2/">
    <title>Response to Mark Zuckerberg &gt;&gt; Chill Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2011-08-12T07:32:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://chill.com/blog/2011/08/chilling/our-response-to-mark-zuckerberg-2/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Zuckerberg calls a Chill feature "lame". Here's Chill's response: "So what are we going to do? We’ve already removed this feature." Lame.]]></description>
<dc:subject>markzuckerberg joshhalliday</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:03847124146b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:markzuckerberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:joshhalliday"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>