<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (guardiantech)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from guardiantech</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/news/2014/09/consumer-reports-tests-iphone-6-bendgate/index.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/131127-apple-on-iphone-6-plus-bendgate-extremely-rare-with-only-9-complaints-of-bending-so-far"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.paintcodeapp.com/news/iphone-6-screens-demystified"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://time.com/3377972/why-apple-didnt-use-sapphire-iphone-screens/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qz.com/259433/the-people-camping-outside-the-apple-store-want-more-than-the-iphone-6/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jamieryan.co.uk/articles/the-amazon-fire-phone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://twitter.com/cdhowe/status/474278424367071232/photo/1"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://counternotions.com/2008/07/16/bet-iphone/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1bef71b8-e433-11e3-a73a-00144feabdc0.html?siteedition=uk#axzz32r6UZ6gg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://9to5mac.com/2014/05/14/likely-iphone-6-with-sharper-larger-1704-x-960-resolution-screen-in-testing/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://9to5mac.com/2014/04/30/apple-begins-shipping-sapphire-from-arizona-plant-to-china-ahead-of-iphone-6-launch/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.electronista.com/articles/14/04/14/might.theoretically.be.justified.by.larger.screen.size/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.imore.com/there-wont-be-another-iphone-not-apple-not-anyone-not-long-time-yet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/20/china-mobile-results-idUSL3N0MH13G20140320"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23744"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2013/12/09/china-mobile-to-accept-iphone-orders-this-week/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.macrumors.com/2013/10/30/space-gray-iphone-5s-most-popular-amid-supply-constraints-blue-leads-for-iphone-5c/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/10/27/another-daylight-saving-time-bug-strikes-apples-ios-7-affects-calendar-display"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://9to5mac.com/2013/10/28/recent-ios-updates-simplify-burst-mode-camera-feature-in-iphone-5s-helps-users-save-storage-space/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.counterpointresearch.com/top-10-phones-in-september-galaxy-s-4-sales-drop-but-still-leads-the-pack#ystfuv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.techadvisor.co.uk/test-centre/mobile-phone/iphone-5s-vs-peppa-pig-phone/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://allthingsd.com/20131014/iphone-5s-outselling-iphone-5c-two-to-one/?mod=tweet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.extremetech.com/computing/168476-macphone-air-mark-shuttleworth-predicts-apple-will-merge-mac-and-iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hs.fi/kuukausiliite/This+is+how+a+Helsingin+Sanomat+journalist+tried+to+save+Nokia/a1381288411564?ref=hs-art-new-1"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/06/magazine/and-then-steve-said-let-there-be-an-iphone.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.learningbyshipping.com/2013/10/03/disruption-and-woulda-coulda-shoulda/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://9to5mac.com/2013/09/29/more-m7-details-data-storage-battery-life-android-motion-coprocessor-adoption/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.zdnet.com/a-849-64gb-iphone-5s-only-costs-apple-218-to-build-7000021175/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.zdnet.com/how-apples-a7-64-bit-chip-gives-ios-plenty-of-headroom-for-the-future-7000020686/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2013/09/12/apples-new-iphone-deals-a-blow-to-nfc/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.techinasia.com/iphone-5c-meant-china-meant-iphone-5-obsolete/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/08/disruptions-apples-next-unveiling-could-make-or-break-a-business/?_r=1&amp;"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://9to5mac.com/2013/09/06/blackberry-messenger-for-iphone-submitted-to-the-app-store-two-weeks-ago/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2013/09/02/sistema-india-opts-for-chinese-smartphones-skips-iphone/?mod=yahoo_hs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jamieryan.co.uk/post/59324213777/iphone-5s-where-the-s-stands-for-speed-again"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mobile-ent.biz/news/read/tim-green-only-boys-use-android/022209"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://furbo.org/2013/08/15/its-the-production-line-stupid/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2013/08/13/the-great-apple-iphone-5-question-china-mobile-or-not-china-mobile/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://daringfireball.net/2013/08/the_case_for_a_new_lower_cost_iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.retrevo.com/content/blog/2013/06/are-smartphone-owners-switching-teams"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://board.protecus.de/t42771.htm#360301"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.righto.com/2012/03/inside-cheap-phone-charger-and-why-you.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://weblog.invasivecode.com/post/57447455012/will-a-fingerprint-sensor-be-apples-next-hit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://supraliminal.net/blog/2013/7/10/ios7-is-a-huge-step-towards-resolution-independence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.androidbeat.com/2013/07/gs4-20million/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bgr.com/2013/07/02/budget-iphone-appearance-analysis/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-06-26/apple-abroad-what-if-the-world-doesnt-want-iphones#r=hpt-ls"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://readwrite.com/2013/06/17/the-radical-ios-7-design-is-a-clear-threat-to-many-existing-apps-and-services#awesm=~o9bcimLqlfQ6B8"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://recombu.com/mobile/interactive/iphone-5s-ios7-concept/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://techpinions.com/androids-market-share-is-literally-a-joke/16709"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2013/05/17/apple-iphone-samsung-galaxy-2/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://campl.us/posts/6iPhoneCameras"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-06/apple-misses-iphone-customers-as-global-carriers-balk.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press_Releases/2013/5/comScore_Reports_March_2013_U.S._Smartphone_Subscriber_Market_Share"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.primatelabs.com/blog/2013/03/samsung-galaxy-s-4-benchmarks/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704657104576142262842435544.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://9to5mac.com/2013/04/29/original-iphone-will-soon-reach-obsolete-status-in-apple-retail-stores/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/28/4277532/iphone-5-vs-galaxy-s4"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fosspatents.com/2013/04/google-keeps-losing-itc-finally-tosses.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ben-evans.com/benedictevans/2013/4/18/us-smart-sales"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjones/2013/04/18/apples-ios-mobile-ad-metrics-dominates-android/?partner=yahootix"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.marco.org/2013/04/09/iphone-6"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://theaxx.net/posts/2013/4/12/on-teens-and-iphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.businessinsider.com/topeka-apple-is-going-to-release-the-iphone-5s-in-at-least-two-screen-sizes-2013-4"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.asymco.com/2013/04/05/reasons-for-ios-outperformance-in-the-us/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press_Releases/2013/4/comScore_Reports_February_2013_U.S._Smartphone_Subscriber_Market_Share"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.forrester.com/george_colony/13-04-02-apples_folding_future"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/20/4129084/another-iphone-lock-screen-exploit-discovered-ios-6-1-3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/12/eye-tracking-tech-will-be-open-to-iphones-others/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://m.imore.com/iphone-5s-problem"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/news/2014/09/consumer-reports-tests-iphone-6-bendgate/index.htm">
    <title>iPhone 6 and 6 Plus bend test &gt;&gt; Consumer Reports News</title>
    <dc:date>2014-09-27T21:57:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/news/2014/09/consumer-reports-tests-iphone-6-bendgate/index.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="quoted">Apple applies 25 kilograms (slightly more than 55 pounds) of force to an iPhone 6 Plus to test flex. What does 55 pounds mean in context? Using our Instron, we found that it's approximately the force required to break three pencils.

Consumer Reports' tests pushed the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus much further than 55 pounds. We started light, applying 10 pounds of force for 30 seconds, then releasing the force. Then we increased the force in 10-pound increments, noted when the phones first started to deform (that's what our engineers call it) and stopped the test for each phone when we saw the screen come loose from the case.

The results: all the phones we tested showed themselves to be pretty tough. The iPhone 6 Plus, the more robust of the new iPhones in our testing, started to deform when we reached 90 pounds of force, and came apart with 110 pounds of force. With those numbers, it slightly outperformed the HTC One (which is largely regarded as a sturdy, solid phone), as well as the smaller iPhone 6, yet underperformed some other smart phones.

Throughout most of our test, the LG G3 and Samsung Galaxy Note 3 bent, then recovered completely from each step up in force. But at 130 pounds, the case of the G3 fractured. At 150 pounds of force, the Note 3's screen splintered and it stopped working.</blockquote>

The iPhone 6 turns out to be weaker under this test than the 6 Plus. And slightly stronger than the this year's HTC One M8.]]></description>
<dc:subject>bendgate iphone</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:9837e545dbe3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:bendgate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/131127-apple-on-iphone-6-plus-bendgate-extremely-rare-with-only-9-complaints-of-bending-so-far">
    <title>'Bendgate' video: is it fake? Questions over editing &gt;&gt; Pocket-Lint</title>
    <dc:date>2014-09-25T21:14:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/131127-apple-on-iphone-6-plus-bendgate-extremely-rare-with-only-9-complaints-of-bending-so-far</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Elyse Betters: <blockquote class="quoted">It's worth mentioning that one of the most popular videos from yesterday, which reportedly showed an iPhone 6 Plus bending with little pressure applied, appears to be edited in a way that might reveal the video is a fake.

Notice the video shows the iPhone 6 Plus drastically bending at 1:40 minutes, and the time on the phone at that point displays 2:26 PM. The man in the video then proceeds to explain around 2:35 minutes into the video that he just finished bending the phone with his thumbs.

But there's one problem with that version of events: The iPhone 6 Plus he supposedly "just" bent displays the time - 1:59 PM - around 2:45 minutes into the video, roughly 27 minutes before the smartphone is shown succumbing to little pressure.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>bendgate iphone fake</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:1b36fa6f2607/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:bendgate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:fake"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.paintcodeapp.com/news/iphone-6-screens-demystified">
    <title>iPhone 6 screens demystified &gt;&gt; PaintCode</title>
    <dc:date>2014-09-16T16:30:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.paintcodeapp.com/news/iphone-6-screens-demystified</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="quoted">Few days ago, Apple introduced iPhone 6 Plus. The new iPhone substantially changes the way graphics are rendered on screen. We've made an infographic to demystify this.</blockquote>

This may be one of the only occasions where an infographic actually does the job it's required to with no wasted drawing or words.]]></description>
<dc:subject>ios iphone design screen</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:680e090e6e74/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ios"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:screen"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://time.com/3377972/why-apple-didnt-use-sapphire-iphone-screens/">
    <title>Why Apple didn’t use sapphire iPhone screens &gt;&gt; TIME</title>
    <dc:date>2014-09-15T21:06:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://time.com/3377972/why-apple-didnt-use-sapphire-iphone-screens/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Tim Bajarin: <blockquote class="quoted">Many have suggested that the decision not to use sapphire was the result of manufacturing issues – that with more time, Apple would have used sapphire screens for the iPhone 6. As I looked closer at the Apple announcement, and after looking more at the benefits and drawbacks of sapphire, it seems that Apple had good reasons to go with ion-strengthened curved glass (Gorilla Glass) instead of sapphire.

While sapphire has been hyped as an alternative screen cover for smartphones, the continued use of strengthened glass has less to do with production issues and more to do with what smartphone manufacturers know about consumers, their preferences and, more importantly, how people actually use phones and what they’re willing to pay for them.

By the way, some reports stated that up until a few weeks before the iPhone announcement, Apple was going to use sapphire but dropped it because of yield issues. This is not true.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>iphone sapphire</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:45fcc0dabf6a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:sapphire"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://qz.com/259433/the-people-camping-outside-the-apple-store-want-more-than-the-iphone-6/">
    <title>The people camping outside the Apple store want more than the iPhone 6 &gt;&gt; Quartz</title>
    <dc:date>2014-09-04T15:03:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://qz.com/259433/the-people-camping-outside-the-apple-store-want-more-than-the-iphone-6/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Zach Wener-Fligner: <blockquote class="quoted">Four people have already lined up to buy the next versions of the iPhone, which aren’t expected to go on sale for another 16 days. But they aren’t really there for iPhones: They are being paid by companies hoping to glom onto the expected frenzy.

Joseph Cruz and Brian Ceballo arrived in front of Apple’s glass cube on Fifth Avenue in Manhattan on Sunday, August 31. They brought tarps, chairs, sleeping bags, and lots of T-shirts for BuyBackWorld, an online electronics retailer. BuyBackWorld is picking up their food bill for the three-week urban campout. The company is also paying for the iPhone 6 of their choice, assuming that’s what Apple unveils at its event next week and begins selling, as expected, on Friday, Sept. 19.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple iphone queue</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:3be1767a285e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:queue"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jamieryan.co.uk/articles/the-amazon-fire-phone">
    <title>The Amazon Fire Phone &gt;&gt; Jamie Ryan</title>
    <dc:date>2014-06-22T21:16:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://jamieryan.co.uk/articles/the-amazon-fire-phone</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="quoted">People misremember the iPhone as some sort of hallelujah moment when it was announced in January 2007. It wasn’t. It was panned by a lot of people when it was first announced for various reasons. The 3 aforementioned ones plus it had a poor camera, no MMS, no video recording, no apps and the back looked ugly!

Everyones waiting for these giant leaps. These clear cut “whoa I just witnessed the unveiling of the Next Big Thing” don’t really happen all that often. Yet the industry still keeps moving forward, it evolves. I see each of these events as baby steps along the way.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>iphone firephone amazon</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:1ea17fe447ea/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:firephone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:amazon"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://twitter.com/cdhowe/status/474278424367071232/photo/1">
    <title>How big is smartphone platform churn? &gt;&gt; Twitter</title>
    <dc:date>2014-06-10T21:28:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://twitter.com/cdhowe/status/474278424367071232/photo/1</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Carl Howe of Yankee Group with data from a March 2014 survey in the US, showing 14% of Android users intended to get an iPhone next, while 7% of iPhone users planned to get an Android phone. 

Android has a larger user base, so the 14% figure will be a larger absolute number. The figures for BlackBerry and Windows Phone loyalty are telling.

Note that this doesn't include featurephone users - who are increasing the total pool of smartphone users by about 1m per month in the US.]]></description>
<dc:subject>android iphone churn yankee</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:f42af832a37a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:churn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:yankee"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://counternotions.com/2008/07/16/bet-iphone/">
    <title>From July 2008: iPhone: The bet Steve Jobs didn’t decline &gt;&gt; Counternotions</title>
    <dc:date>2014-06-02T01:30:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://counternotions.com/2008/07/16/bet-iphone/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[From July 2008, pointing out (among other risks for Apple of building a mobile phone) that <blockquote>If you fail, it would be a public fiasco of the first order, likely lopping off at least a third of your market cap and seriously eroding financial sector confidence in your company’s ability to grow and diversify beyond the Mac and the iPod businesses.</blockquote>

What's also interesting, looking back, is that "a huge and risky bet" is precisely how Apple staff have described the iPhone - both in personal recollections and in court cases (against Samsung).]]></description>
<dc:subject>business history iphone apple</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:533ce7a463d9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1bef71b8-e433-11e3-a73a-00144feabdc0.html?siteedition=uk#axzz32r6UZ6gg">
    <title>Apple readying new software platform for the ‘Smart Home’ &gt;&gt; FT.com</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-26T20:31:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1bef71b8-e433-11e3-a73a-00144feabdc0.html?siteedition=uk#axzz32r6UZ6gg</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Tim Bradshaw: <blockquote>Apple is readying a new software platform that would turn the iPhone into a remote control for lights, security systems and other household appliances, as part of a move into the “internet of things”.

…The scheme will be similar to Apple’s existing “Made for iPhone” label, given to compatible headphones, speakers and other accessories, but with a new brand and logo. Apple may also provide additional checks and assurances that certified products are not vulnerable to hackers.

The Cupertino-based company was likely to emphasise the privacy protections built into its smart home system, one person familiar with Apple’s plans told the FT, given heightened sensitivity about technology companies’ access to personal information amid revelations about US intelligence agencies’ online surveillance programmes.
 
Apple considers privacy a key advantage over Google, the person said, since Google relies on targeted advertising as its main source of income.</blockquote>

If that's right, it makes Google's December SEC filing - where it talked about getting adverts everywhere - look like a sort of advert for Apple's approach.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple smarthome iphone wwdc</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:12e075d490d9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smarthome"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:wwdc"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://9to5mac.com/2014/05/14/likely-iphone-6-with-sharper-larger-1704-x-960-resolution-screen-in-testing/">
    <title>iPhone 6 with larger, sharper 1704 x 960 resolution screen in testing &gt;&gt; 9to5Mac</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-14T13:56:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://9to5mac.com/2014/05/14/likely-iphone-6-with-sharper-larger-1704-x-960-resolution-screen-in-testing/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Mark Gurman: <blockquote>Apple is preparing to make another significant screen adjustment to the iPhone. Instead of retaining the current resolution, sources familiar with the testing of at least one next-generation iPhone model say that Apple plans to scale the next iPhone display with a pixel-tripling (3X) mode.

This means that Apple will likely be tripling the aforementioned “base resolution” (568 x 320) of the iPhone screen in both directions, and that the iPhone screen resolution will be scaled with an increase of 150% from the current 2X resolution of 1136 x 640. Of course, <a href="http://9to5mac.com/2012/05/22/likely-next-generation-iphone-with-3-9-inch-display-1136-x-640-resolution-in-testing/">Apple tests several different iPhones and display technologies</a>, so it is possible that Apple chooses to take another route for display specifications for the 2014 iPhone upgrade.</blockquote>

A 4.7in phone with that resolution would be 416ppi; a 5.5in phone would be 356ppi. Bet Apple would rather sell a ton of 5.5in iPhones than 7in iPad minis.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple iphone screen</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:2b213557eb10/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:screen"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://9to5mac.com/2014/04/30/apple-begins-shipping-sapphire-from-arizona-plant-to-china-ahead-of-iphone-6-launch/">
    <title>Apple begins shipping sapphire from Arizona plant to China ahead of iPhone 6 launch &gt;&gt; 9to5Mac</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-02T12:21:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://9to5mac.com/2014/04/30/apple-begins-shipping-sapphire-from-arizona-plant-to-china-ahead-of-iphone-6-launch/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Apple for the first time started shipping sapphire from its new plant in Arizona to its suppliers in China ahead of ramping up the operation with more furnaces capable of supplying larger quantities. The news comes from UBS Research’s Q1 preview on GT Advanced Technologies, the company that Apple has partnered with to open a sapphire plant producing the material expected to replace Corning’s Gorilla Glass on the next-generation iPhone display.</blockquote>

"Sapphire furnaces" sounds like something out of Flash Gordon.]]></description>
<dc:subject>iphone sapphire</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:10387a4f46eb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:sapphire"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.electronista.com/articles/14/04/14/might.theoretically.be.justified.by.larger.screen.size/">
    <title>Apple considering hiking price of iPhone 6 by $100, says analyst &gt;&gt; Electronista</title>
    <dc:date>2014-04-14T21:55:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.electronista.com/articles/14/04/14/might.theoretically.be.justified.by.larger.screen.size/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Apple has been asking carriers for approval to raise the base subsidized price of the iPhone 6 from $199 to $299, claims Jefferies analyst Peter Misek. The carriers have allegedly balked at the idea so far. Apple could potentially justify the increase due to the phone's bigger size; it's unclear in fact if the hike would apply to the 4.7-inch model or the 5.5-inch one, since Misek refers to just one iPhone 6. Many shoppers would likely assume a 5.5-inch phone would be more expensive.</blockquote>

Misek has a <a href="http://www.cultofmac.com/215736/a-history-of-horrible-apple-predictions-from-peter-misek/">woeful record</a> on Apple predictions. Watching brief on this one.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple iphone phablet</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:1aa56d0d79ac/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:phablet"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.imore.com/there-wont-be-another-iphone-not-apple-not-anyone-not-long-time-yet">
    <title>There won't be another iPhone-class product, not for Apple, not for anyone, not for a long time &gt;&gt; iMore</title>
    <dc:date>2014-04-09T15:15:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.imore.com/there-wont-be-another-iphone-not-apple-not-anyone-not-long-time-yet</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Rene Ritchie: <blockquote>We've all seen the reports. The iPhone by itself is more profitable than many of Apple's competitors are in total. iPhone is as profitable as companies with oligopoly control over fossil fuel resources. It's a singular phenomenon.<p>

The iPad doesn't make as much money as the iPhone. And, no iWatch, iTelevision, iEspresso maker, or any other consumer electronics product is going to either.<p>

Yet article after article, analyst after analyst insists Apple simply must release their "next big thing" and now or, doomed. 60 days to release an iWatch or doomed. Has to sell 65m units a year or doomed. Haunted. Doomed.</blockquote>

Sensible. The smartphone has been the fastest-adopted technology ever* (data for the wheel not available).]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple iphone iwatch</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:243a81483b58/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iwatch"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/20/china-mobile-results-idUSL3N0MH13G20140320">
    <title>First annual profit drop in 14 years spurs China Mobile spending on 4G &gt;&gt; Reuters</title>
    <dc:date>2014-03-20T13:07:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/20/china-mobile-results-idUSL3N0MH13G20140320</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>China Mobile executives also hinted that sales of the iPhone, which analysts had expected to reach at least 17m units in the first year after the launch, are well below expectations.<p>

"Most of our 1.34 million 4G users are using an iPhone," said China Mobile Chairman Xi Guohua. "It's just been getting started for one or two months. So far it's hard to tell how that will affect our business," he said.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>iphone chinamobile 4g</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:600919c9451e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:chinamobile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:4g"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23744">
    <title>November 2008: Apple iPhone doomed to failure - Windows Mobile 7 plans for 2009 leaked &gt;&gt; Network World</title>
    <dc:date>2014-01-30T13:56:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23744</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Mitchell Ashley in November 2008: <blockquote>Too many major players are in the mobile phone market, who have and will bring iPhone-like products to market over the coming months and years. LG has already done so with the LG Voyager phone, and now Microsoft's plans for Windows Mobile 7 OS have been leaked and described in considerable detail by Inside Microsoft blogger Nathan Weinberg.<p>

With many features dubbed "iPhone compete", WM7 is all about effective uses of the touch screen, finger gestures, and additional motion gestures. Microsoft's put a lot of thought into how to make the mobile phone interface more intuitive and easier to use, even more so than Apple's iPhone.</blockquote>

Apple has never had a product, or a year, when it hasn't been "doomed to failure".]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple iphone</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:14a15103128e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2013/12/09/china-mobile-to-accept-iphone-orders-this-week/">
    <title>China Mobile to accept iPhone orders this week &gt;&gt; WSJ Digits blog</title>
    <dc:date>2013-12-09T16:14:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2013/12/09/china-mobile-to-accept-iphone-orders-this-week/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>A phone call to a China Mobile customer representative confirmed that customers can preorder iPhones from the site starting Thursday.<p>

“Customers can begin to preorder for our new 4G services from Dec. 12 through the company’s website and some dedicated branches in Shanghai. But we will only start providing commercial 4G services after Dec. 18,” the customer services operator said.<p>

China Mobile is preparing a pricing plan for new iPhones but the company hasn’t informed the customer services team of the details yet, the representative said.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>iphone chinamobile</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:cf3de7f3096b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:chinamobile"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.macrumors.com/2013/10/30/space-gray-iphone-5s-most-popular-amid-supply-constraints-blue-leads-for-iphone-5c/">
    <title>Space Gray iPhone 5s Most Popular Amid Supply Constraints, Blue Leads for iPhone 5c &gt;&gt; Mac Rumors</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-31T17:21:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.macrumors.com/2013/10/30/space-gray-iphone-5s-most-popular-amid-supply-constraints-blue-leads-for-iphone-5c/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[43 percent of iPhone 5s units sold were space gray, while 30 percent were silver and 27 percent were gold. Supplies of the space gray model were more readily available than the silver and gold iPhones, but consumers have demonstrated a preference for the black iPhone in the past.

Something tells the the limited supply of the gold and silver iPhone 5S massively skewed these results. Let's just say that in the queue for the iPhone 5S at its launch in Covent Garden in London, everyone seemingly wanted a gold one.]]></description>
<dc:subject>iphone apple colours</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:c0e0b1e51ed8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:colours"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/10/27/another-daylight-saving-time-bug-strikes-apples-ios-7-affects-calendar-display">
    <title>Another daylight saving time bug strikes Apple's iOS 7, affects calendar display &gt;&gt; Apple Insider</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-28T16:48:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/10/27/another-daylight-saving-time-bug-strikes-apples-ios-7-affects-calendar-display</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Several AppleInsider readers have reported the line indicating the current time is displaced by one hour in the calendar app — for example, at 12:15 p.m., the calendar app draws the "current time" line in the slot for 1:15 p.m., despite displaying the correct time beside the line and in the system notification bar. 

You'd think after three years and three major software revisions Apple could get this one right.]]></description>
<dc:subject>iPhone apple</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:88a978570988/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iPhone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://9to5mac.com/2013/10/28/recent-ios-updates-simplify-burst-mode-camera-feature-in-iphone-5s-helps-users-save-storage-space/">
    <title>Recent iOS updates simplify Burst Mode camera feature in iPhone 5s, helps users save storage space &gt;&gt; 9to5Mac</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-28T16:39:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://9to5mac.com/2013/10/28/recent-ios-updates-simplify-burst-mode-camera-feature-in-iphone-5s-helps-users-save-storage-space/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Because photos from the 8 megapixel camera take up so much space, retaining the entire group of photos could have caused a negative effect on what users could store on their iPhones. With iOS 7.0.3, Apple has rectified this potential issue by making it simple to choose favorite images from the Burst Mode session and delete the other photos.

Considering there's no micro SD expansion on the iPhone, space can certainly be at a premium sometimes.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple iphone photography</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:0ee4ca1dd5ac/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:photography"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.counterpointresearch.com/top-10-phones-in-september-galaxy-s-4-sales-drop-but-still-leads-the-pack#ystfuv">
    <title>Top 10 phones in August: Galaxy S4 sales drop but still leads the pack &gt;&gt; Counterpoint Research</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-16T12:02:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.counterpointresearch.com/top-10-phones-in-september-galaxy-s-4-sales-drop-but-still-leads-the-pack#ystfuv</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Premium smartphone (above US$400 wholesale) category sales are showing signs of stagnating growth as most of the sales in the premium segment are coming from replacement sales from existing smartphone users. But the overall smartphone market is still growing at the rate of 40~50% a year with major growth thus coming from burgeoning smartphone sales in the sub US$200 price segments<p>

September month sales are very important to shape the holiday season demand trajectory, a decisive moment distinguishing which phones are going to be top-sellers. Galaxy S4 sales might – pick up again with special holiday pricing though we expect the flagship model to sell 80% more than its predecessor the Galaxy S3 from launch till year end, instead of our previous view of 100% more.</blockquote>

SGS4 sell-through (ie bought by end users) was 5m in August, it says; it counts the iPhone 516GB as a different phone from the iPhone 5 32GB, which seems odd.]]></description>
<dc:subject>iphone samsung</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:6eea728711c7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.techadvisor.co.uk/test-centre/mobile-phone/iphone-5s-vs-peppa-pig-phone/">
    <title>iPhone 5s vs Peppa Pig phone head-to-head review &gt;&gt; Tech Advisor Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-15T15:17:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.techadvisor.co.uk/test-centre/mobile-phone/iphone-5s-vs-peppa-pig-phone/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Neil Bennett: <blockquote>The iPhone 5s is still the most desirable phone on the market. It's still unavailable – order one today and you'll get it sometime later this month, which only adds to its cachet as the smartphone we all wish we owned.<p>

We got our hands on one and you can read our in-depth review <a href="http://www.macworld.co.uk/ipad-iphone/reviews/?reviewid=3463673">here</a>, but in this review I look at how it stacks up against the current most popular model in our household – at least with my two-year-old daughter Alice – the Peppa Pig phone.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>review iphone peppapig</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:7f505aab7407/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:review"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:peppapig"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://allthingsd.com/20131014/iphone-5s-outselling-iphone-5c-two-to-one/?mod=tweet">
    <title>iPhone 5s outselling iPhone 5c two-to-one &gt;&gt; AllThingsD</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-14T17:30:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://allthingsd.com/20131014/iphone-5s-outselling-iphone-5c-two-to-one/?mod=tweet</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>According to CIRP’s survey of U.S. consumers who purchased Apple’s latest iPhones during the last days of September, the 5s accounted for 64% of total iPhone sales following its launch that month. Meanwhile, the the 5c accounted for 27%, with the legacy iPhone 4S making up the remaining 9%.<p>
So not only is the 5s outselling the 5c, it’s outselling it more than two to one.<p>
Welcome news for Apple, since cannibalization of the 5s by the 5c was a potential commercial risk for this iPhone cycle. CIRP’s data suggests that the company has so far avoided it — though that’s hardly surprising at this early stage. After all, the iPhone 5c was intended as a mainstream smartphone, the iPhone 5s as an enthusiast one — a “forward-thinking” device for forward-thinking folks. And enthusiasts are often early adopters.</blockquote>

In fact, the sales split seems to have been almost exactly the same as the 5/4S split a year ago - except the 5c is doing slightly better (though probably within the margin of sampling error). ]]></description>
<dc:subject>iphone US</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:401a7b093c9d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:US"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.extremetech.com/computing/168476-macphone-air-mark-shuttleworth-predicts-apple-will-merge-mac-and-iphone">
    <title>MacPhone Air: Mark Shuttleworth predicts Apple will merge Mac and iPhone &gt;&gt; ExtremeTech</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-13T21:15:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.extremetech.com/computing/168476-macphone-air-mark-shuttleworth-predicts-apple-will-merge-mac-and-iphone</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Anyone that has been paying attention to the evolution of OS X and iOS will have at some point noticed that the two operating systems are slowly acting more like each other. Mark Shuttleworth, founder of Canonical who recently attempted to crowdfund the Ubuntu Edge phone that would double as a desktop PC, has certainly noticed Apple’s seemingly slow merger of its desktop and mobile OS. He predicts Apple will merge Mac and iPhone hardware one day soon, creating a device similar to the Ubuntu Edge.</blockquote>

Then again, he reckoned people would crowdfund the Ubuntu Edge project to the tune of $32m.]]></description>
<dc:subject>mac iphone</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:fa17efc3c202/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:mac"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.hs.fi/kuukausiliite/This+is+how+a+Helsingin+Sanomat+journalist+tried+to+save+Nokia/a1381288411564?ref=hs-art-new-1">
    <title>This is how a Helsingin Sanomat journalist tried to save Nokia &gt;&gt; Kuukausiliite - Helsingin Sanomat</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-10T16:23:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.hs.fi/kuukausiliite/This+is+how+a+Helsingin+Sanomat+journalist+tried+to+save+Nokia/a1381288411564?ref=hs-art-new-1</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The journalist wrote, inter alia: <blockquote>half a year ago a friend of mine at work showed me a device manufactured by Apple called the iPod Touch. I fell in love instantly. I wanted an iPod, and with that device I could also have convenient access to the internet and much more. I ordered my own iPod touch, turned it on, and knew immediately how to use it. I have used the device now on a daily basis for over six months, and I have not even thought about any manuals. The logic of the device opens up right away. It is no wonder that it is a huge success all over the world.<p>

My new Nokia telephone model is called the E 51. Unfortunately the phone has not been designed in so that just anybody could learn to use it easily.<p>

On the contrary, I think that it has been designed as if its most important mission would be to advertise itself to people who are interested in telephone technology. All kinds of amazing functions are offered on the display, but as I do not understand what they mean, I guess that I will never use them.</blockquote>

But keep reading to find out about the Nokia executive who visited the author of the letter, and what he said.]]></description>
<dc:subject>nokia iphone ux ui</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:ae419e71600b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:nokia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ui"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/06/magazine/and-then-steve-said-let-there-be-an-iphone.html">
    <title>And then Steve said, ‘let there be an iPhone’ &gt;&gt; NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-04T21:59:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/06/magazine/and-then-steve-said-let-there-be-an-iphone.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Utterly terrific piece of investigation and storytelling by Fred Vogelstein of how the iPhone came to be - and how the demonstration by Jobs was a white-knuckle ride for the inventors. An extract: <blockquote>“I understood how it could be done,” [Tony] Fadell says. “But it’s one thing to think that, and another to take a room full of special, one-off gear and make a million phone-size versions of that in a cost-effective, reliable manner.” The to-do list was exhausting just to think about. “You had to go to LCD vendors who knew how to embed technology like this in glass; you had to find time on their line; and then you had to come up with compensation and calibrating algorithms to keep the pixel electronics from generating all kinds of noise in the touch-screen” — which sat on top of the LCD. “It was a whole project just to make the touch-screen device. We tried two or three ways of actually making the touch-screen until we could make one in enough volume that would work.”<p>

Shrinking OS X and building a multitouch screen, while innovative and difficult, were at least within the skills Apple had already mastered as a corporation. No one was better equipped to rethink OS X’s design. Apple knew LCD manufacturers because it put an LCD in every laptop and iPod. Mobile-phone physics was an entirely new field, however, and it took those working on the iPhone into 2006 to realize how little they knew.</blockquote>

Save some time and read it all.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple iphone</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:106ed8068acd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.learningbyshipping.com/2013/10/03/disruption-and-woulda-coulda-shoulda/">
    <title>Disruption and woulda, coulda, shoulda &gt;&gt; Learning by Shipping</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-03T20:18:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.learningbyshipping.com/2013/10/03/disruption-and-woulda-coulda-shoulda/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Steve Sinofsky looks at how BlackBerry went from world-beater to also-ran: <blockquote>It is instructive to consider the many assumptions or ingredients of Blackberry success that go beyond the popular “keyboard v. touch”.  In thinking about my own experience with the product, the following list just a few things that were essentially revisited by the iPhone from the perspective of the Blackberry device/team:</blockquote>

His list contains 12 items where the iPhone (and, it should be said, Android) made assumptions about the future that were right; only one involves the keyboard.

Next question is, what are the other assumptions that will be overturned which we now take for granted?]]></description>
<dc:subject>blackberry iphone</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:4ef757e7239e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:blackberry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://9to5mac.com/2013/09/29/more-m7-details-data-storage-battery-life-android-motion-coprocessor-adoption/">
    <title>More M7 details: data storage, battery life, Android motion coprocessor adoption &gt;&gt; 9to5Mac</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-02T17:54:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://9to5mac.com/2013/09/29/more-m7-details-data-storage-battery-life-android-motion-coprocessor-adoption/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Azumio has been hoping for a motion coprocessor for quite some time. Rather than having the battery-hog CPU running all the time, placing in a motion coprocessor allows the phone to store all of the information while the CPU can sleep or focus on other tasks. The company told me they were in talks with Android manufacturers about placing motion coprocessors in their phones, and now that Apple has been boasting about this new piece of hardware, there’s a good chance other manufacturers will follow suit. The Moto X has its own version of motion tracking and 4.3 includes support for activity detection, but nothing matches the low-power capabilities of the M7.</blockquote>

Azumio consumes 25-30% of battery power on non-iPhone 5S devices - a ridiculous amount for something devoted to telling you how many steps you've taken (a pedometer is cheaper and uses zero battery). Let's hope that better uses for the M7 and other coprocessors come along soon.]]></description>
<dc:subject>tracking m7 iphone</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:b73aee6d07d6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:tracking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:m7"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.zdnet.com/a-849-64gb-iphone-5s-only-costs-apple-218-to-build-7000021175/">
    <title>A $849 64GB iPhone 5s only costs Apple $218 to build &gt;&gt; ZDNet</title>
    <dc:date>2013-09-27T05:40:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.zdnet.com/a-849-64gb-iphone-5s-only-costs-apple-218-to-build-7000021175/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>According to a teardown analysis carried out analysts at IHS, a top-of-the-line 64GB iPhone 5s, which retails unlocked for $849, costs Apple a mere $218 to build, a price that includes the manufacturing costs.<p>

The build price difference between this and the 16GB iPhone 5s is less than $20, and yet Apple charges consumers a whopping $200 for the extra 48GB of storage.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>iphone apple costs</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:fe685c8e93c1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:costs"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.zdnet.com/how-apples-a7-64-bit-chip-gives-ios-plenty-of-headroom-for-the-future-7000020686/">
    <title>How Apple's A7 64-bit chip gives iOS plenty of headroom for the future &gt;&gt; ZDNet</title>
    <dc:date>2013-09-16T13:04:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.zdnet.com/how-apples-a7-64-bit-chip-gives-ios-plenty-of-headroom-for-the-future-7000020686/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Simon Bisson: <blockquote>With a virtualisation-ready processor in its new phone, Apple can now start to move iOS in the direction of a hypervisor-controlled sandbox environment, perhaps using a technology like Microsoft's research OS Drawbridge.<p>

Here the operating system component of a VM is tailored to the application it is hosting – minimising the attack surface of each secure partition. Combined with a fingerprint sensor to identify users, Apple has the tools it needs to deliver biometric access control, allowing devices to support multiple users, with files and apps for one user hidden from another using hardware encryption.<p>

While iOS doesn't support this approach currently, it's a logical extension of the current iOS security model, which uses selectively encrypted sections of the file system to secure application-specific data. It's also an approach that would allow apps written for an older version of iOS to continue to run, in their own dedicated partition, without the security features that newer apps, in their individual partitions, could use. That way there'd be backward compatibility, allowing Apple to deliver a more secure, enterprise-friendly, iOS without destroying its existing ecosystem.</blockquote>

With smartphones (and tablets - surelu a future iPad have the A7) Apple seems serious about the enterprise. This might be important.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple arm 64bit iphone enterprise</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:d7f16685f9b5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:arm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:64bit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:enterprise"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2013/09/12/apples-new-iphone-deals-a-blow-to-nfc/">
    <title>Apple’s new iPhone deals a blow to NFC &gt;&gt; WSJ Digits blog</title>
    <dc:date>2013-09-15T21:15:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2013/09/12/apples-new-iphone-deals-a-blow-to-nfc/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>With 40% of the US smartphone market, Apple commands a large lead over other handset makers, according to Nielsen data. Its mobile operating system and app store are influential among application developers.<p>

“It’s definitely troublesome for any developer looking to support NFC that it is not in the iPhone,” said Jordan McKee, an analyst with researcher Yankee Group. “It’s not going to reach massive scale without Apple adopting NFC.”<p>

Though nearly every other major smartphone maker has models with NFC capability, a recent Yankee Group survey found that just 18% of US consumers have such handsets, said McKee.<p>

NFC has been slow to catch on in part because it isn’t any easier than a credit-card swipe, and because not enough stores accept the technology. According to Gartner analyst Mark Hung, fewer than 100,000 NFC-enabled readers are in use in the US, which compares with near-ubiquity for traditional credit-card readers.<p>

Meanwhile, early NFC adopters like BlackBerry and Nokia have seen their handset sales decline. An effort by Google to create a digital wallet linked to NFC chips in some Sprint phones has slowed as other carriers favour their own NFC joint venture called Isis, which is only available in two US cities.<blockquote>

In a year's time, the US might see more commerce via fingerprint and Bluetooth than NFC. (That 18%  for NFC-enabled handsets seems low.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>iphone nfc mobile</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:7f64cb068e75/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:nfc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:mobile"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.techinasia.com/iphone-5c-meant-china-meant-iphone-5-obsolete/">
    <title>The iPhone 5C was never meant for China; it was meant to make the iPhone 5 obsolete &gt;&gt; Tech In Asia</title>
    <dc:date>2013-09-14T20:35:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.techinasia.com/iphone-5c-meant-china-meant-iphone-5-obsolete/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Charlie Custer: <blockquote>I’m no big Apple fan, and I think the company is perpetually behind the curve when it comes to China, but it can’t possibly be so stupid as to think a $700 phone was going to help it corner China’s budget phone market, a market that <a href="http://www.techinasia.com/iphone-losing-china-xiaomi-tomorrows-phone/">it would have been stupid for Apple to try to enter</a> in the first place. In fact, I think if any of yesterday’s phones was targeted at China specifically, it was the gold iPhone 5S. The iPhone is a sort of status symbol in China, and while the idea of a gold iPhone may seem tacky to some, it’s going to have some appeal to users in China who buy their phones primarily to show off around town, not because of the internal specs.</blockquote>

Import duties also mean that grey market imports will be popular.]]></description>
<dc:subject>iphone china</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:8257173c8fcc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:china"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/08/disruptions-apples-next-unveiling-could-make-or-break-a-business/?_r=1&amp;">
    <title>Disruptions: Apple's next unveiling could make or break a business &gt;&gt; NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2013-09-10T22:21:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/08/disruptions-apples-next-unveiling-could-make-or-break-a-business/?_r=1&amp;</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>These annual iPhone unveilings have become a sort of Creative Destruction Day in Silicon Valley. Remember all those companies that were making nifty little digital video recorders? There aren’t many of them left, after Apple added video recording to the iPhone in 2008. And with every even slightly improved iPhone that adds features or services offered by others, Apple has tightened the screws on a long list of companies, including other smartphone makers like Nokia and BlackBerry and gaming companies like Nintendo.</blockquote>

Now disrupted: Fitbit. Also, flashlight apps.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple iphone</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:4c1627683cfd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://9to5mac.com/2013/09/06/blackberry-messenger-for-iphone-submitted-to-the-app-store-two-weeks-ago/">
    <title>BlackBerry Messenger for iPhone submitted to the App Store two weeks ago &gt;&gt; 9to5Mac</title>
    <dc:date>2013-09-08T20:50:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://9to5mac.com/2013/09/06/blackberry-messenger-for-iphone-submitted-to-the-app-store-two-weeks-ago/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Sources say that the BBM for iPhone application is nearly identical to the version on the BlackBerry Z10, but lacks a couple of unspecified features.<p>

While BBM has been in review for 2 weeks, Apple tells developers that it has been approving 99% of submitted apps within 5 business days:</blockquote>

Puzzling. And where's the Android version?]]></description>
<dc:subject>bbm iphone</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:a286bffd5ced/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:bbm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2013/09/02/sistema-india-opts-for-chinese-smartphones-skips-iphone/?mod=yahoo_hs">
    <title>Sistema India opts for Chinese smartphones, skips iPhone &gt;&gt; WSJ</title>
    <dc:date>2013-09-02T17:42:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2013/09/02/sistema-india-opts-for-chinese-smartphones-skips-iphone/?mod=yahoo_hs</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Dmitry Shukov, chief executive at Sistema Shyam Teleservices Ltd., told The Wall Street Journal it decided not to carry the iPhone because Apple sets a floor for unit sales, making it more challenging to sell the smartphone because Sistema Shyam operates on the less popular CDMA mobile standard.<p>

Apple sells phones running CDMA or code division multiple access technology through other channels in India. Of India’s 867.80m wireless users, only 73.18m were on CDMA networks at end-March, data from the telecom regulator showed.</blockquote>

(Thanks #rquick for the link.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple iphone cdma india</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:87440b073223/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:cdma"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:india"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jamieryan.co.uk/post/59324213777/iphone-5s-where-the-s-stands-for-speed-again">
    <title>iPhone 5S, where the S stands for speed. again &gt;&gt; Jamie Ryan</title>
    <dc:date>2013-08-25T20:56:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://jamieryan.co.uk/post/59324213777/iphone-5s-where-the-s-stands-for-speed-again</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Ryan is ex-Apple, ex-Samsung, ex-BSkyB: <blockquote>I’ve heard whispers that the framerate on the new phone will be increased dramatically, possibly as high as 120fps giving iOS 7 a very fluid feeling and really bringing to life the parallax and blur effects present throughout the OS.<p>

Speed will also apply to the camera, in both stills and video. The stills camera will be incredibly fast at taking photos but the big features will be that the iPhone 5S will record high speed videos. These will play back nicely on the new iPhone and will also have the added benefit of being able to slow videos down to give a slow motion effect.</blockquote>

Where by 120fps he means on both the OS screen compositing and the camera. Fascinating prediction.]]></description>
<dc:subject>ios7 iphone</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:3599cb66b3ce/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ios7"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.mobile-ent.biz/news/read/tim-green-only-boys-use-android/022209">
    <title>Tim Green: &quot;Only boys use Android...&quot; &gt;&gt; Mobile Entertainment</title>
    <dc:date>2013-08-22T17:02:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.mobile-ent.biz/news/read/tim-green-only-boys-use-android/022209</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>What do teenage girls think about BlackBerry, in-app purchases, Android and more? I asked some…<p>

I'm on holiday in a remote corner of Wales, cut off from mobile connectivity and therefore unable to check the important things going on in the outside world. Football transfer rumours for example.<p>

I've also little idea what's going on in the mobile space, which makes it tricky for me to comment on the week's big news.<p>

So instead, I quizzed three youngsters about their phone habits. They are Lois (16), Marnie (14) and Lucy (12).</blockquote>

Really fascinating interview. (Not very comforting for BlackBerry though.) Be interesting to see a version interviewing boys.]]></description>
<dc:subject>iphone teenager android smartphone</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:f80b1bf83457/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:teenager"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://furbo.org/2013/08/15/its-the-production-line-stupid/">
    <title>It’s the production line, stupid &gt;&gt; furbo.org</title>
    <dc:date>2013-08-21T07:20:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://furbo.org/2013/08/15/its-the-production-line-stupid/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Craig Hockenberry brings a little big of logic to the cries of "Apple MUST make a phone with a larger screen!": <blockquote>[at 2012 levels] every second of every day you need six cases, six headphone jacks, six LCD screens, six batteries, six CPUs, six 10µf capacitors, six 10kΩ surface mount resistors, and thousands of other components.<p>

Look at where all the leaks about new products come from: it’s always the supply chain that produces all these components. This should give you an idea of how many partners are involved.<p>

Basically, Apple creates a pipeline that produces devices at an amazing rate. And it’s a finely tuned machine with a lot of inertia. You don’t just walk in and say, “Hey, let’s change the screen!” Doing so would throw that machine out of balance: a new screen means that some of the components (like the headphone jack) don’t change, while others would (the case, for example.)</blockquote>

What you see released was planned two years ago, in general.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple iphone</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:051be227623d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2013/08/13/the-great-apple-iphone-5-question-china-mobile-or-not-china-mobile/">
    <title>The great Apple iPhone 5 question: China Mobile or not China Mobile? &gt;&gt; Forbes</title>
    <dc:date>2013-08-15T17:53:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2013/08/13/the-great-apple-iphone-5-question-china-mobile-or-not-china-mobile/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Whichever new models Apple comes out with next month, the really interesting challenge will be how it tackles the challenge from China.

<blockquote>Even if Apple does bring out hardware which is compatible with the China Mobile network, the company still has to persuade China Mobile to take it. And that’s not going to be entirely easy.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple iphone china</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:473230194d6b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:china"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://daringfireball.net/2013/08/the_case_for_a_new_lower_cost_iphone">
    <title>The case for a new lower-cost iPhone &gt;&gt; Daring Fireball</title>
    <dc:date>2013-08-14T23:11:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://daringfireball.net/2013/08/the_case_for_a_new_lower_cost_iphone</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[John Gruber on the sense and sensibilities of iPhone 5C speculation.

<blockquote>The 5C is not about selling a piece of junk to some sort of unwashed masses; it’s about continuing to push the price down to expand the iPhone’s market without changing what the iPhone brand stands for. Siri is now a big part of that brand. If Apple thinks the iPhone 5S needs “protection”, then the 5S (and Apple itself) has problems.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>iphone apple</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:3cf9c9809a3f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.retrevo.com/content/blog/2013/06/are-smartphone-owners-switching-teams">
    <title>Are smartphone owners switching teams? &gt;&gt; Retrevo</title>
    <dc:date>2013-08-09T05:20:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.retrevo.com/content/blog/2013/06/are-smartphone-owners-switching-teams</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A US online survey from June, but in line with others: <blockquote>we wondered if consumers were considering jumping over to the other camp for their next smartphone. In this Gadgetology report we find out how loyal iPhone and Android users are to their platforms and ask phone buyers what they are looking for in their next smartphone. Here’s what we found: <br />• Apple’s loyal following remains intact<br />• Very few iPhone users are planning on switching to Android<br />
• Apple had better increase the screen size in future iPhones<br />• Men prefer Android phones and larger screens more than women do<br />• Lots of iPhone owners are waiting for too see what the next iPhone looks like but if it has the same screen size it could be a deal killer<br />• New iPad, a less expensive iPhone, and an Apple television get consumers most excited</blockquote>

We'd love to see similar surveys for Europe and Asia. Criminal use of Comic Sans, though.]]></description>
<dc:subject>android iphone US</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:72bcb0d14c8d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:US"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://board.protecus.de/t42771.htm#360301">
    <title>iPhone logs my complete movement profile &gt;&gt; Security Forum</title>
    <dc:date>2013-08-08T16:52:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://board.protecus.de/t42771.htm#360301</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>i just swiped through my iPhone iOS7 Beta 5 settings and stumbled across the following new default setting:<p>

Settings → Privacy → Location Services → System Services (at the bottom) → Frequent Locations<p>

It kept track of my complete movement profile (location and time tracking) without me knowing anything.<p?>

Just to give you an insight whats possible and already used with and without PRISM.</blockquote>

It's opt-in, judging by the settings, and linked to your Apple ID; seems to be to help Apple improve its Maps - and there's a hint of Google Now-ishness in that it has tags for "home" and "work", and "Frequent locations" will "allow your iPhone to learn places you frequently visit in order to provide useful location-related information." What would that be? (Thanks @Sputnikkers for the link.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>iphone maps privacy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:537745fb1439/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:maps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:privacy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.righto.com/2012/03/inside-cheap-phone-charger-and-why-you.html">
    <title>Tiny, cheap, and dangerous: Inside a (fake) iPhone charger &gt;&gt; Ken Shirriff's blog</title>
    <dc:date>2013-08-08T13:32:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.righto.com/2012/03/inside-cheap-phone-charger-and-why-you.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I recently wrote a popular article on <a href="http://www.arcfn.com/2012/02/apple-didnt-revolutionize-power.html">the history of computer power supplies</a>, which led to <a href="http://news.ycombinator.com.test.getcachefast.com/item?id=3636047">speculation</a> on what's inside those amazingly small one-inch cube USB chargers sold by Apple, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B005OT05IE/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=rightocom&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B005OT05IE">Samsung</a>, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00474KHBW/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=rightocom&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B00474KHBW">RIM</a>, and other companies. In the interest of science, I bought a cheap no-name cube charger off eBay for $2.79, and took it apart. It's amazing that manufacturers can build and sell a complex charger for just a few dollars. It looks a lot like a genuine Apple charger and cost a lot less. But looking inside, I found that important safety corners were cut, which could lead to a 340 volt surprise. In addition, the interference from a cheap charger like this can cause touchscreen malfunctions. Thus, I recommend spending a few dollars more to get a brand-name charger.</blockquote>

Truly fascinating: a lesson in how tiny differences can be lethal. (Thanks @AlanAudio.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>electronics iphone apple</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:1296c0f292cb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:electronics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://weblog.invasivecode.com/post/57447455012/will-a-fingerprint-sensor-be-apples-next-hit">
    <title>Will a fingerprint sensor be Apple’s next hit? &gt;&gt; Invasive Code</title>
    <dc:date>2013-08-05T21:19:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://weblog.invasivecode.com/post/57447455012/will-a-fingerprint-sensor-be-apples-next-hit</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Geppy Parziale: <blockquote>Let’s take a look at the most critical component of the entire fingerprint recognition process: the sensor. Recognition is highly dependent on the quality of the captured fingerprint image as in less noise, and better image. The core technology used to manufacture the sensors can introduce noise and errors on the captured fingerprint image, influencing the recognition to such a negative extreme that you could be continuously rejected by the system (false rejection) or somebody else could be granted access to the system instead of you (false acceptance).<p>

There are 2 kinds of fingerprint capture methods: touchless and touch-based fingerprint capture. I pioneered the <a href="http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7606395.pdf">first category</a>.</blockquote>

You <em>pioneered</e> it? Suddenly a lot more interested, Mr Parziale. A very useful primer even if Apple doesn't do anything of the sort.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple fingerprint iphone</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:a1a0e4bc0ada/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:fingerprint"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://supraliminal.net/blog/2013/7/10/ios7-is-a-huge-step-towards-resolution-independence">
    <title>iOS 7 is a huge step towards resolution independence &gt;&gt; Supraliminal</title>
    <dc:date>2013-07-29T12:30:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://supraliminal.net/blog/2013/7/10/ios7-is-a-huge-step-towards-resolution-independence</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[James Russell: <blockquote>In <a href="http://tumblr.caseyliss.com/post/53514874875">Stretchy Thumbs</a>, Casey Liss wonders if the new system wide back gesture in iOS 7 (obviating the need to constantly reach to the top left of the screen) is a step towards supporting the idea of a larger screened <a href="http://www.marco.org/2013/01/31/iphone-plus-speculation">iPhone Plus</a>. I would say that in most of the new patterns in iOS 7, Apple are telegraphing much more than that: clear steps towards proper resolution independence for iOS.<p>

These changes would pave the way not for an iPhone Plus with bigger pixels, but one with a new screen resolution at current Retina iPhone DPI levels that can display more content on screen. And once resolution independence is established, who knows what other larger or smaller devices it would pave the way for?</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple iphone screens</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:07c1367672c5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:screens"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.androidbeat.com/2013/07/gs4-20million/">
    <title>Unofficial: Samsung GS4 unit sales hit 20 million, press release due to come out soon &gt;&gt; Android Beat</title>
    <dc:date>2013-07-04T22:12:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.androidbeat.com/2013/07/gs4-20million/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Stefan Constantinescu: <blockquote>The Korean website iNews24 is reporting that Samsung will soon be holding a press conference to announce that GS4 unit sales have surpassed 20m unit sales. Considering that the device started shipping in late April, that would mean it’s taken roughly two months to hit this milestone. For the sake of comparison, it took the GS3 100 days to hit the same figure.<p>


I <a href="https://twitter.com/WhatTheBit/statuses/337620133499502592">predicted that Samsung would announce 20 million GS4 sales in mid-June</a>. That didn’t happen. Then I thought they’d announce the 20m sales figures on their event in London on June 20th, but that didn’t happen either.<p>

When the GS4 hit 10 million units sold, it was at a growth rate of 2x the GS3. With this new figure, it’s more like 1.6x, which is still impressive, but not as impressive as analysts are expecting.</blockquote>

See also <a href="http://thenextweb.com/mobile/2013/07/03/the-samsung-galaxy-s4-has-now-passed-20-million-shipments-according-to-reports-in-korea/>The Next Web report</a> on the same topic for more figures.]]></description>
<dc:subject>samsung gs4 sales shipments iphone</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:9de113826026/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:gs4"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:sales"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:shipments"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bgr.com/2013/07/02/budget-iphone-appearance-analysis/">
    <title>Budget iPhone appearance analysis: ugly on purpose &gt;&gt; BGR</title>
    <dc:date>2013-07-02T21:27:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://bgr.com/2013/07/02/budget-iphone-appearance-analysis/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[ Tero Kuittinen, considering the "candy-coloured" phone casings that have been doing the rounds: <blockquote>There can’t be much differentiation on the hardware or software aspects [between a new iPhone and the 'budget' one]. So there must be a very sharp line drawn between the two models based on the look and feel.<p>

Apple cannot have the bulk of its customers trade down to the budget phone from more expensive devices. It must make the entry-level model look so vulgar and cheap that most iPhone users will stick to the main line models, even if they have to pay a $200 to $400 premium. The budget phones have to look tackier than the new iPhone 5S, but that is not enough — they must also be less desirable than the iPhone 5 and iPhone 4S… yet still appear more desirable than low-end Android phones.</blockquote>

If it's cheap, it should look cheap. Seems a strong argument.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple iphone</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:e9aeef4738dc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-06-26/apple-abroad-what-if-the-world-doesnt-want-iphones#r=hpt-ls">
    <title>Apple abroad: what if the world doesn't want IPhones? &gt;&gt; Businessweek</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-27T20:47:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-06-26/apple-abroad-what-if-the-world-doesnt-want-iphones#r=hpt-ls</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>People who want high-end smartphones have probably already bought them, says Francisco Jeronimo, IDC’s director of European mobile device research. New buyers have less disposable income and are buying smartphones only because they have become cheap. “We are now entering the second wave of smartphone adoption, which will be driven by those users with no need for a smartphone,” he says.<p>

These customers have less money to spend and less reason to splurge when cheaper products are available. In addition, European phone carriers are much less generous when it comes to subsidizing customers’ phones. IPhones don’t seem much more expensive than other smartphones in the US, but the difference can be significant for those who are paying for them out of pocket.</blockquote>

Logically, either Apple will see smaller market share (but, possibly, higher sales) or it will offer cheaper ones and maintain (or grow) its market.]]></description>
<dc:subject>europe iphone pricing subsidies apple</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:38a94a774cb4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:europe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:pricing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:subsidies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://readwrite.com/2013/06/17/the-radical-ios-7-design-is-a-clear-threat-to-many-existing-apps-and-services#awesm=~o9bcimLqlfQ6B8">
    <title>Radical iOS 7 Design Is Threat To Some Existing Apps &gt;&gt; ReadWrite</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-19T04:50:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://readwrite.com/2013/06/17/the-radical-ios-7-design-is-a-clear-threat-to-many-existing-apps-and-services#awesm=~o9bcimLqlfQ6B8</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Brian S. Hall:

<blockquote>iOS 7 is a truly audacious redesign of Apple's chief operating system. I have been using the beta version since last week and it's abundantly clear that Apple is determinedly focused on ensuring that iOS—the software underpinnings of the iPhone and iPad—remains the simplest, purest OS on the planet. 

It's also obvious that the new iOS 7 design and enhanced functionality will kill off many non-Apple apps, including some good ones.</blockquote>

Weep for the flashlight-app makers. The claim that "iTunes Radio should choke off all but the very best most-entrenched streaming music competitors" is debatable too – or, at least, there are plenty of other reasons why the not-so-best competitors will fall by the wayside.]]></description>
<dc:subject>ios7 apple iphone</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:ac32b15b2826/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ios7"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://recombu.com/mobile/interactive/iphone-5s-ios7-concept/">
    <title>Interactive Apple iPhone 5S &amp; iOS 7 Concept &gt;&gt; Recombu</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-06T16:37:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://recombu.com/mobile/interactive/iphone-5s-ios7-concept/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Steve King has been hard at work: <blockquote>Interactive iPhone 5S & iOS7 Concept - 
built with HTML, CSS & JavaScript</blockquote>

No images or masks. Very nifty programming. Looks pretty much like an iPhone, to be honest. And the icons are flat..ter.]]></description>
<dc:subject>ios iphone html5 css3</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:b4ebc4ba22cd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ios"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:html5"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:css3"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://techpinions.com/androids-market-share-is-literally-a-joke/16709">
    <title>Android’s market share is literally a joke &gt;&gt;Tech.pinions</title>
    <dc:date>2013-05-23T16:49:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://techpinions.com/androids-market-share-is-literally-a-joke/16709</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[John Kirk: <blockquote>Android accounts for approximately 70% of global smartphone shipments and 29% of global profits. This means that the average Android manufacturer creates just 0.41% of profit for each point of market share (0.29/0.70 = 0.414). In other words, the average Android manufacturer needs to capture 2.4 points of market share just to increase their [share of] market profit by 1 percentage point.<p>
Such a low fair share profit index may indicate that Android manufacturers are:<br />– Having difficulty differentiating their product;<br />– Sacrificing profits in order to buy market share (the “race to the bottom”);<br />
– Unable to reach <a href="http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/05/09/teardown-finds-samsung-galaxy-s4-more-costly-to-build-than-apples-iphone-5">economies of scale in the manufacturing process</a>.</blockquote>

Kirk's point is that people who talk about low-cost iPhones are overlooking price elasticity. Although might he be overlooking the fact that the sector of the market which is price inelastic has been almost exhausted?]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple economics iphone android</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:8529c74fe269/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2013/05/17/apple-iphone-samsung-galaxy-2/">
    <title>Galaxy S4: 10M in 4 weeks. iPhone 5: 5M in 3 days. &gt;&gt; Fortune Tech</title>
    <dc:date>2013-05-19T14:29:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2013/05/17/apple-iphone-samsung-galaxy-2/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Philip Elmer DeWitt: <blockquote>It's been years since Samsung reported any unit sales numbers at all for its mobile phones, so the tech press took notice Thursday when the South Korean manufacturing giant decided it had something to brag about.<p>Samsung Electronics co-CEO Shin Jong-kyun told reporters at an industry forum in Seoul that he is confident shipments of the Galaxy S4 will top 10m next week - four weeks after the device went on sale in 60 countries, including Korea, China, India and the US.
<p>"That would make the mobile device the fastest-selling selling smartphone in Samsung's history," the <a href="http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/tech/2013/05/133_135811.html"><em>Korea Times</em></a> reported - a line echoed in the <a href="http://www.techmeme.com/130517/p11#a130517p11">U.S. press</a>.
<p>That kind of coverage must drive Tim Cook crazy.
<p>Because when Apple (<a href="http://money.cnn.com/quote/quote.html?symb=AAPL">AAPL</a>) reported last September that it sold 5m iPhone 5 units in three days, analysts expressed <a href="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/09/24/apples-5-million-iphone-5-sales-what-analysts-are-saying/">"disappointment"</a> and Business Insider ran this headline:
<blockquote><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/iphone-5-sales-opening-weekend-2012-9">IPHONE 5 OPENING WEEKEND SALES COME IN WORSE THAN EXPECTED</a></blockquote>
<p>And what was its headline Friday?
<blockquote><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/samsung-s4-sales-2013-5?op=1">Samsung's S4 Starts Strong: 10 Million Units In Less Than A Month</a></blockquote></blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple iphone samsung</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:f9d9333e4045/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://campl.us/posts/6iPhoneCameras">
    <title>How does the iPhone 5 camera compare to previous iPhone cameras? &gt;&gt; Camera+</title>
    <dc:date>2013-05-15T21:23:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://campl.us/posts/6iPhoneCameras</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Taken with every iPhone camera, starting with the very first, to the most recent. The difference from the 3G to the 3GS is colossal. (It's an iPhone/iPad app, which is why it doesn't have reference shots from other handsets.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>camera photography tech iphone</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:c2d5eae9884e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:camera"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:photography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:tech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-06/apple-misses-iphone-customers-as-global-carriers-balk.html">
    <title>Apple misses IPhone customers as global carriers balk &gt;&gt; Bloomberg</title>
    <dc:date>2013-05-06T19:28:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-06/apple-misses-iphone-customers-as-global-carriers-balk.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Apple Inc is missing out on a chance to court as many as 2.8 billion new smartphone customers, many of them in Asia, as wireless-service providers balk at conditions imposed by the iPhone maker and drag their heels in signing on as partners.<p>

Apple has announced fewer than a dozen new wireless-service providers to sell the device since September 2011, leaving the total at about 240. Holdouts represent billions of would-be subscribers in countries such as China, Japan, India and Russia, said Horace Dediu, a market analyst who runs Asymco.com. Samsung Electronics, Apple’s biggest smartphone rival, sells devices through almost all of the world’s 800 carriers, Asymco said.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple iphone</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:e3edd322c175/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press_Releases/2013/5/comScore_Reports_March_2013_U.S._Smartphone_Subscriber_Market_Share">
    <title>March 2013 US smartphone subscriber market share &gt;&gt; ComScore</title>
    <dc:date>2013-05-04T20:58:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press_Releases/2013/5/comScore_Reports_March_2013_U.S._Smartphone_Subscriber_Market_Share</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The market share numbers mask what's going on among Android handset makers: Samsung is gaining fast (going from 35% of Android to 41% since September 2012), HTC is losing users, Motorola and LG are very slightly up.]]></description>
<dc:subject>android apple iphone smartphone</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:e6c90e00d67d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.primatelabs.com/blog/2013/03/samsung-galaxy-s-4-benchmarks/">
    <title>Samsung Galaxy S 4 benchmarks &gt;&gt; Primate Labs</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-30T21:18:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.primatelabs.com/blog/2013/03/samsung-galaxy-s-4-benchmarks/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[John Poole: <blockquote>• It's clear that the Samsung Galaxy S 4 will be the fastest smartphone available when it is released in April. What's not clear is how the Galaxy S 4 will handle the increased power and cooling requirements that generally come with faster processors.<p>

• The Samsung Galaxy S 4 is twice as fast as the Samsung Galaxy S 3. Given that the Samsung Galaxy S 3 is less than a year old, that's a remarkable achievement. I am amazed at how quickly smartphone technology is improving.<p>

• The Samsung Galaxy S 4 is also twice as fast as the Apple iPhone 5. Apple has improved performance dramatically in the past (there was 2.5x increase in performance from the iPhone 4S to the iPhone 5). Will they be able to make a similar improvement for the next iPhone?</blockquote>

(Via @room13)]]></description>
<dc:subject>samsung iphone</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:546fdd398789/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704657104576142262842435544.html">
    <title>February 2011: 'Apple works on line of less-expensive iPhones' &gt;&gt; WSJ.com</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-30T15:24:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704657104576142262842435544.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[February 2011: <blockquote>One of the people, who saw a prototype of the phone late last year, said it is intended for sale alongside Apple's existing line. The new device would be about half the size of the iPhone 4, which is the current model.<p>

The new phone — one of its code names is N97 — would be available to carriers at about half the price of the main iPhones. That would allow carriers to subsidize most or all of the retail price, putting the iPhone in the same mass-market price range as rival smartphones, the person said. Apple currently sells iPhones to carriers for $625 each on average. With carrier subsidies, consumers can buy iPhones for as little as $199 with a two-year contract.</blockquote>

So this is a meme that has been around quite a while. One has to feel that either these are some rubbish sources, or that the timetable for this was rather longer than the writer expected. Also, what does "half the size of the iPhone 4" mean? Half the length? Half the width? Half the thickness?]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple iphone</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:3d8eb0385698/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://9to5mac.com/2013/04/29/original-iphone-will-soon-reach-obsolete-status-in-apple-retail-stores/">
    <title>Original iPhone will soon reach ‘obsolete’ status in Apple Retail Stores &gt;&gt; 9to5Mac</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-30T10:34:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://9to5mac.com/2013/04/29/original-iphone-will-soon-reach-obsolete-status-in-apple-retail-stores/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>According to internal Apple documentation, the original iPhone, which first debuted in 2007, will soon enter “obsolete” status, with a few exceptions. The official switch will happen on 11 June, 2013, when the iPhone, along with several other Macs and Xserve models will officially be classified as vintage and obsolete products by Apple.</blockquote>

Means it won't be eligible for repairs and servicing, not that it won't work. Be interested to know what the battery life is by now, though.]]></description>
<dc:subject>iphone original charlesarthur</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:8e916ea5d1e6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:original"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/28/4277532/iphone-5-vs-galaxy-s4">
    <title>iPhone 5 vs Galaxy S4 &gt;&gt; The Verge Forums</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-29T14:02:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/28/4277532/iphone-5-vs-galaxy-s4</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Verge forum user "techspecialist" looks at the Anandtech reviews for the two phones' specifications, which seem to show the iPhone 5 leading in most categories, including battery life: <blockquote>Yes, I know, the S4 has a bigger display and a faster CPU, but it also has a much larger battery. (almost two times that of iPhone 5) The 3 to 4 hour difference is just staggering. And the thing is, while the S4's CPU is definitely faster than the A6 chip, it's not significantly faster, at least in web browsing.</blockquote>

Standard caveat: spec readings give you little indication of what the experience is like. (Thanks @avro for the link.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>iphone samsung galaxys4</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:2d0621455cab/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:galaxys4"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.fosspatents.com/2013/04/google-keeps-losing-itc-finally-tosses.html">
    <title>Google keeps losing: ITC finally tosses Motorola's complaint against Apple &gt;&gt; FOSS Patents</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-23T16:43:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.fosspatents.com/2013/04/google-keeps-losing-itc-finally-tosses.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>This week begins for Google like last week ended: with another failure to convert the $12.5bn purchase of Motorola Mobility into leverage against a major rival. On Friday a German court <a href="http://www.fosspatents.com/2013/04/setback-for-google-german-court-finds.html">denied Google's Motorola an injunction against Microsoft</a> over a push notification patent that is most likely invalid. Today the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) <a href="http://usitc.gov/secretary/fed_reg_notices/337/337_745_Notice04222013sgl.pdf">threw out the last patent-in-suit</a> remaining in the investigation of Motorola's October&nbsp;2010 complaint against Apple. <a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6,246,862.PN.&OS=PN/6,246,862&RS=PN/6,246,862">U.S. Patent No. 6,246,862</a> on a "sensor controlled user interface for portable communication device" was found invalid. The patent relates to the feature that a touch screen ignores touches if the user is on a phone call and holds the device close to his head. Google wanted the ITC to ban the importation of any iPhones with that feature into the US market.</blockquote>

Motorola not prevailing in patent lawsuits is becoming a sort of background hum of the internet. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>google motorola itc iphone apple</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:3bca5e73f9ae/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:motorola"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:itc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ben-evans.com/benedictevans/2013/4/18/us-smart-sales">
    <title>US smart sales &gt;&gt; Benedict Evans</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-18T21:04:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://ben-evans.com/benedictevans/2013/4/18/us-smart-sales</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>First, Android isn't really growing at all in the USA, at least at the big two operators. ('Other smart' is almost all Android now). All the growth is coming from iPhone.<p>

Second, there's near-zero seasonality in Android phone sales. People decide they want a phone and go out and buy whatever's in the shop at the time that looks good. Launches of 'hero' Android phones appear to have no impact at all - they may take share from other Androids, but not from iPhone and they don't increase overall sales.<p>

Third, there seems to be a complete disconnect between Android and iPhone purchasing. One can understand iPhone sales per se going up in a launch quarter, but why don't Android sales go down in those quarters? It looks like a new iPhone launch doesn't tempt in Android buyers at all.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>android iphone smartphone</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:861d06a9f9a7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjones/2013/04/18/apples-ios-mobile-ad-metrics-dominates-android/?partner=yahootix">
    <title>Apple's iOS mobile ad metrics dominates Android &gt;&gt; Forbes</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-18T17:19:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjones/2013/04/18/apples-ios-mobile-ad-metrics-dominates-android/?partner=yahootix</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Chuck Jones: <blockquote>MoPub is an ad-serving platform for mobile applications that allows advertisers to bid on ad inventory from thousands of iOS and Android smartphone application providers/suppliers. Over 230 Tier 1 brand advertisers (up from 180 last quarter) and 58 of the top 100 largest advertisers use MoPub. The application providers come from the US, Europe, Asia and Latin America with 45 billion monthly ad impressions (up from 30 billion last quarter) across two dozen verticals.<p>

CJ Takeaway #1: As Apple AAPL -1.83% extends its lead in mobile advertising app developers should prioritize new features and applications on iOS over Android. Note that Android tablets account for less than 1% of all mobile ad spend.<p>

CJ Takeaway #2: It could become more difficult for other platforms such as Windows and BlackBerry to gain traction with app developers.</blockquote>

The iPhone accounts for just over half of all mobile ad spend through MoPub.]]></description>
<dc:subject>iphone android advertising</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:d0c4562f9ddf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:advertising"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.marco.org/2013/04/09/iphone-6">
    <title>iPhone 6 &gt;&gt; Marco.org</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-15T17:09:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.marco.org/2013/04/09/iphone-6</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Marco Arment, Instapaper developer, on naming: <blockquote>A year later, when Apple did release a model named “iPhone 5” that was far better than the 4S and had an external redesign, the inertia of Apple pessimism was so strong and the press had become such petulant children about Apple products that they shat all over it even though it was a huge update that gave them everything they asked for, plus more.<p>

Now, Apple pessimism is even stronger. No matter what they release and no matter how well it sells, they won’t win over the press, the pundits, the stock market, or the rhetoric. Not this year. They could release a revolutionary 60-inch 4K TV for $99 with built-in nanobots to assemble and dispense free smartwatches, and people would complain that it should cost $49 and the nanobots aren’t open enough.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple iphone naming</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:2c26cf40db15/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:naming"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://theaxx.net/posts/2013/4/12/on-teens-and-iphones">
    <title>On Teens and iPhones &gt;&gt; The Axx</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-14T21:35:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://theaxx.net/posts/2013/4/12/on-teens-and-iphones</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Alex Guyot, 17-year-old attendee at CDO High School in Tuscon, Arizonia, following on from the in-some-quarters doubted survey by Piper Jaffray about US teens' eagerness to get iPhones (saying 48% had one, 62% planned to get one as their next mobile, 23% expect to buy an Android)

: <blockquote>Overall, Apple has simply done an amazing job at entrenching themselves in the minds and hearts of teenagers. Despite the results of any studies or articles saying otherwise, I can easily assert that the demand for iPhones from the teenage audience is in no way waning. In fact, more teens seem to want iPhones than ever before. Certainly there is still a presence of Android owners, which while clearly not as large as the number of students with iPhones, is still a competitive force, but the loyalty of this presence to it's chosen operating system seems to be shrinking much faster than it's growing. Android isn't in any danger of extinction in this high school's population, but the dominance of the iPhone is blatantly obvious.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>iphone statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:ac1f9e6a435c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:statistics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.businessinsider.com/topeka-apple-is-going-to-release-the-iphone-5s-in-at-least-two-screen-sizes-2013-4">
    <title>TOPEKA: Apple Is going to release the iPhone 5S in 'at least' two screen sizes &gt;&gt; Business Insider</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-09T16:43:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.businessinsider.com/topeka-apple-is-going-to-release-the-iphone-5s-in-at-least-two-screen-sizes-2013-4</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>However, today, Brian White at Topeka Capital is injecting some life into the iPhone rumor mill. He says Apple could release a new iPhone with multiple screen sizes this year.<p>
"After our meeting with a tech-supply chain company, we walked away with the view that Apple will release the iPhone 5S in at least two screen sizes this summer and possibly three," says White. He's on the seventh day of a tour of technology suppliers in China and Taiwan.<p>
Apple has been criticized for not making the iPhone's screen bigger. It made it taller last year, expanding the screen to 4in, up from 3.5in, but it's not enough. Compared to Samsung and HTC which make phones with 5in, and 4.7in screens, the iPhone feels pretty tiny.<p>
For some people, that's great. For other people, it would be nice to have a big iPhone.</blockquote>

Apple already makes the iPhone in two screen sizes. Or does he mean three sizes?]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple iphone rumour</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:30b4aa560efb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:rumour"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.asymco.com/2013/04/05/reasons-for-ios-outperformance-in-the-us/">
    <title>Reasons for iOS outperformance in the US &gt;&gt; asymco</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-05T15:58:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.asymco.com/2013/04/05/reasons-for-ios-outperformance-in-the-us/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The iPhone is gaining users more quickly than all Android in the US, and has done for the past four months - something that hasn't happened ever before. <blockquote>The reason iOS is growing more rapidly may be due to three factors</blockquote>

The first (being on more carriers) seems obvious enough, but the third is crucial and has big implications for the future, not just in the US.

Also of note: Android + iOS = 91% of the installed smartphone base in the US, now at 57% of all mobile phone users.]]></description>
<dc:subject>asymco iphone us android ecosystems</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:30153b6ec56c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:asymco"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ecosystems"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press_Releases/2013/4/comScore_Reports_February_2013_U.S._Smartphone_Subscriber_Market_Share">
    <title>comScore reports February 2013 US smartphone subscriber market share &gt;&gt; comScore</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-05T11:35:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press_Releases/2013/4/comScore_Reports_February_2013_U.S._Smartphone_Subscriber_Market_Share</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[When you do the numbers, it shows that compared to last month (for which the data is also available) Apple has added 3.1m owners and Android - all Android - has added 1.45m. Apple additions have been outstripping Android additions for the past four months - where Android used to outstrip Apple every quarter (going back to October 2009). Odd.]]></description>
<dc:subject>android iphone apple us comscore</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:3d0dc77556cb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:comscore"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.forrester.com/george_colony/13-04-02-apples_folding_future">
    <title>Apple's Folding Future &gt;&gt; Forrester Blogs</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-03T21:10:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.forrester.com/george_colony/13-04-02-apples_folding_future</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[George Colony: <blockquote>Without any inside knowledge of Apple or other makers' plans, I believe that the coolest future smartphones will fold. To demonstrate, take the current iPhone 5, lengthen it by 1.5 inches, widen it by an inch, make it 30% thinner, then fold the whole thing in half. In your hand (as per my mock-up to the left) you would be holding a square device with a full screen of icons, video, pictures -- ready to make a call or open an app. This form factor would fit easily into a shirt breast pocket or the front pocket of a pair of jeans. But when you open the phone, you would have a massive screen (there's display glass on both sides of the device) with a diagonal of nearly seven inches.</blockquote>

Colony is chief executive of the research company Forrester.]]></description>
<dc:subject>forrester iphone</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:bfa8641023f0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:forrester"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/20/4129084/another-iphone-lock-screen-exploit-discovered-ios-6-1-3">
    <title>New iPhone lock screen exploit discovered in iOS 6.1.3, exposes contacts and photos | The Verge</title>
    <dc:date>2013-03-21T00:11:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/20/4129084/another-iphone-lock-screen-exploit-discovered-ios-6-1-3</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Quite a bizarre one involving the SIM tray. As one commenter says, how do you find hacks like this? ]]></description>
<dc:subject>iphone hacking lock</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:7d65e8d17494/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:hacking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:lock"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/12/eye-tracking-tech-will-be-open-to-iphones-others/">
    <title>Eye-tracking tech will be open to iPhones and other devices &gt;&gt; NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2013-03-13T06:59:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/12/eye-tracking-tech-will-be-open-to-iphones-others/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Brian Chen: <blockquote>Samsung Electronics won’t be the only company that gets a fancy eye-tracking feature. A start-up company called uMoove, which has been developing this type of technology for three years, says it will offer eye- and head-tracking to anyone, including device makers like Apple and software developers who make mobile apps.<p>

Based in Israel, has been working on a technology for smartphones and tablets to track eye and head movements using a device’s front-facing camera. It said on Tuesday that very soon it would offer a software tool kit to apply its technology to applications.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>eye eyetracking iphone samsung</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:21054cf029fd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:eye"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:eyetracking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://m.imore.com/iphone-5s-problem">
    <title>The &quot;iPhone 5S&quot; problem &gt;&gt; iMore.com</title>
    <dc:date>2013-03-12T15:48:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://m.imore.com/iphone-5s-problem</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Rene Ritchie: <blockquote>Apple may or may not release a product called the "iPhone 5S" this year. The presumption, however, fueled by Apple having previously released the 2009 iPhone 3GS-as-in-speed, and the 2011 iPhone 4S-as-in-Siri, is that 2013 will see an iPhone 5S-as-in-something update. Whether it ultimately proves real or not, the perception of a yearly update cycle and its tick-tock nature, is becoming problematic.</blockquote>

It's Intel which works on the "tick-tock principle, of jumping forward and then assimilating change, but of course it dominates its field. Things aren't quite as simple in smartphones.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple iphone smartphone</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:bde14a18b92e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>