<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (guardiantech)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from guardiantech</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/09/researchers-can-slip-an-undetectable-trojan-into-intels-ivy-bridge-cpus/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://venturebeat.com/2013/06/17/smartwatch-intel/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://threads2.scripting.com/2013/june/whyTechRespondsSoPoorlyToPrProblems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2013/06/03/hard-choices-intels-orrible-new-haswell-chips/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.technologyreview.com/news/514386/intel-fuels-a-rebellion-around-your-data/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9238470/Outgoing_Intel_CEO_knocks_Windows_8_predicts_200_touch_PCs_this_year"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20130207PD216.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/print/9233039/Intel_working_on_48_core_chip_for_smartphones_tablets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anandtech.com/show/6355/intels-haswell-architecture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20121002PR201.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://newsroom.intel.com/community/intel_newsroom/blog/2012/09/26/intel-statement-in-response-to-unsubstantiated-news-reports"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.v3.co.uk/v3-uk/review/2207100/motorola-razr-i-review"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://allthingsd.com/20120830/ultrabooks-still-racking-up-infra-sales/?mod=tweet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20120809PD206.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fiercemobileit.com/story/lenovo-release-thinkpad-x1-carbon-business-ultrabook-august/2012-08-08"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://img.ly/knAY"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.quora.com/Apple-Inc-2/How-does-Apple-keep-secrets-so-well/answer/Kim-Scheinberg?srid=i1"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/04/18/taiwan_odm_ultrabook_ivy_bridge/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2012/04/intel-windows-8-tablet-specs/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.netbooknews.com/43110/clover-trail-tablet-reference-design-with-32nm-chipset-video/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.tested.com/news/ces-2012-intel-lays-out-its-2012-ultrabook-strategy-concept-laptops/3417/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arstechnica.com/hardware/news/2011/09/ultrabook-intels-300-million-plan-to-beat-apple-at-its-own-game.ars"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/07/28/intel_appup_program/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.businessinsider.com/even-intel-is-betting-against-windows-with-android-push-2011-4?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://venturebeat.com/2011/04/11/can-intel-atomize-arm-with-new-tablet-chips/"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/09/researchers-can-slip-an-undetectable-trojan-into-intels-ivy-bridge-cpus/">
    <title>Researchers can slip an undetectable trojan into Intel’s Ivy Bridge CPUs &gt;&gt; Ars Technica</title>
    <dc:date>2013-09-18T21:47:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/09/researchers-can-slip-an-undetectable-trojan-into-intels-ivy-bridge-cpus/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>In a <a href="http://people.umass.edu/gbecker/BeckerChes13.pdf">recently published research paper</a>, scientists devised two such backdoors they said adversaries could feasibly build into processors to surreptitiously bypass cryptographic protections provided by the computer running the chips. The paper is attracting interest following recent revelations the National Security Agency is exploiting weaknesses deliberately built-in to widely used cryptographic technologies so analysts can <a href="http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/09/nsa-attains-the-holy-grail-of-spying-decodes-vast-swaths-of-internet-traffic/">decode vast swaths of Internet traffic</a> that otherwise would be unreadable.
<p>The attack against the Ivy Bridge processors sabotages random number generator (RNG) instructions <a href="http://electronicdesign.com/learning-resources/understanding-intels-ivy-bridge-random-number-generator">Intel engineers added to the processor</a>. The exploit works by severely reducing the amount of entropy the RNG normally uses, from 128 bits to 32 bits.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>hardware intel security encryption</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:d27e0729f597/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:hardware"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:intel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:security"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:encryption"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://venturebeat.com/2013/06/17/smartwatch-intel/">
    <title>Intel CTO hints at watch-like smart device for texting &gt;&gt; VentureBeat</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-17T20:05:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://venturebeat.com/2013/06/17/smartwatch-intel/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Meghan Kelly:

<blockquote>Intel is testing a number of “experimental devices in the lab,” one of which is a smartwatch-like device, according to chief technology officer Justin Rattner.

“Actually, we’re looking at novel display devices. The watch is kind of — if you want to put the time on it, that’s fine ,” said Rattner at Bloomberg’s Next Big Thing conference. “But if you’re talking about texting today, wouldn’t it be nice if you could just look at your wrist?”</blockquote>

And speak into it to reply, possibly? But the more interesting question here is whether Apple is involved in any of Intel's experiments.]]></description>
<dc:subject>Intel smartwatch</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:b92c3db5103a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:Intel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartwatch"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://threads2.scripting.com/2013/june/whyTechRespondsSoPoorlyToPrProblems">
    <title>Why tech responds poorly to crises, and how to do better &gt;&gt; Scripting.com</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-11T06:06:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://threads2.scripting.com/2013/june/whyTechRespondsSoPoorlyToPrProblems</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Dave Winer: <blockquote>The first time I saw a tech company blow it in the Internet age was in 1994 when Intel was trying to quell public outrage about a problem with math functions on their Pentium chip. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_FDIV_bug">According to Wikipedia</a>, an estimated 1 in 9 billion floating point divides would produce inaccurate results. The problem could be demonstrated in Excel. Intel said the flaw was so small that it didn't warrant any concern by users. They were probably right. But that didn't stop the outrage from escalating. Every time Intel spoke, the problem got worse. Eventually they had to offer replacement chips to any user who wanted one. It might have cost much less if they had admitted the problem at the start.</blockquote>

Winer's right; yet equally, people were "upset" about something that would hardly ever affect them. Part of why they were upset was that they couldn't <em>predict</em> when they would be affected. Possibly that's the real lesson: people dislike uncertainty with a visceral intensity.]]></description>
<dc:subject>intel pentium</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:41f084221f37/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:intel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:pentium"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2013/06/03/hard-choices-intels-orrible-new-haswell-chips/">
    <title>Hard Choices: Intel’s ‘orrible new Haswell chips &gt;&gt; Rock, Paper, Shotgun</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-04T16:58:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2013/06/03/hard-choices-intels-orrible-new-haswell-chips/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Jeremy Laird: <blockquote>Intel reckons Haswell is the biggest step forward in processor efficiency in the history of its x86 CPUs. Yup, even bigger than the transition from Pentium 4 to Core.<p>

Thus, if Haswell is anything like as good as Intel claims, it’s going to shake things up. Think tablets that combine iPad proportions with proper PC levels of processing prowess. Microsoft’s Surface Pro, as nice as it is in some ways, doesn’t quite deliver on that. Haswell, according to the hype, will. I’ve long wanted a tablet convertible that’s no bigger than an iPad but has the power of a proper PC. So I’m genuinely excited by the prospect. But it’s got naff-all to do with gaming PCs.</blockquote>

Given that laptops are outselling desktops by 4:3, and that gaming PCs make up a tiny fraction of desktop sales, this might not be a surprise. But does this point towards the end of gaming rigs? (Thanks @beardyweirdy666 for the link.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>haswell intel mobile desktop gaming</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:c67b3c615d93/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:haswell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:intel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:mobile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:desktop"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:gaming"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.technologyreview.com/news/514386/intel-fuels-a-rebellion-around-your-data/">
    <title>Intel’s data economy initiative aims to help people capture the value of personal data &gt;&gt; MIT Technology Review</title>
    <dc:date>2013-05-20T21:40:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.technologyreview.com/news/514386/intel-fuels-a-rebellion-around-your-data/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Intel is a $53bn-a-year company that enjoys a near monopoly on the computer chips that go into PCs. But when it comes to the data underlying big companies like Facebook and Google, it says it wants to “return power to the people.”<p>

Intel Labs, the company’s R&D arm, is launching an initiative around what it calls the “data economy”—how consumers might capture more of the value of their personal information, like digital records of their their location or work history. To make this possible, Intel is funding hackathons to urge developers to explore novel uses of personal data. It has also paid for a rebellious-sounding website called <a href="http://www.wethedata.org/">We the Data</a>, featuring raised fists and stories comparing Facebook to Exxon Mobil.</blockquote>

"To destabilise a company, make what it charges for into a commodity."]]></description>
<dc:subject>intel bigdata privacy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:8b7019a86c96/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:intel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:bigdata"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:privacy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9238470/Outgoing_Intel_CEO_knocks_Windows_8_predicts_200_touch_PCs_this_year">
    <title>Outgoing Intel CEO knocks Windows 8, predicts $200 touch PCs this year &gt;&gt; Computerworld</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-17T20:50:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9238470/Outgoing_Intel_CEO_knocks_Windows_8_predicts_200_touch_PCs_this_year</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Paul Otellini, who will retire from Intel next month, joined a chorus of others, ranging from analysts to longtime Microsoft hardware partners such as Dell, in placing some of the responsibility of the latest PC sales contraction on Microsoft's shoulders.<p>

"There is an adoption curve," Otellini acknowledged, talking about Windows 8 and its "Modern" user interface (UI), a radical overhaul of the traditional desktop. "We didn't quite have that same kind of adoption curve in Windows 7 versus XP before it. This requires a little bit of training."<p>

Otellini, however, did say, "Once you get over that adoption curve, I don't think you go back." He also argued, as have most analysts and many Windows 8 users, that on a touch-enabled device Windows 8 is easier to use than Windows 7.<p>

Shortages of touch-ready hardware, particularly notebooks, have plagued the industry since Windows 8's launch. And the higher prices of touch PCs have put off many consumers, who have been trained for years to expect low-priced machines. When they can't find a touch PC in their price range, experts have said, they instead steer toward lower-cost touch tablets.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>intel windows8 touchscreen</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:e49e379caa4c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:intel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:windows8"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:touchscreen"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20130207PD216.html">
    <title>Asustek, Gigabyte together share over 50% of own-brand motherboard market in 2012 &gt;&gt; Digitimes</title>
    <dc:date>2013-02-09T23:19:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20130207PD216.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Asustek Computer and Gigabyte Technology shipped 22m and 19m motherboards respectively for own-brand sale in the global DIY market in 2012, together occupying 51.3% of the total global shipments of 80m units, according to Taiwan-based motherboard makers.<p>

ASRock and Micro-Star International (MSI) shipped 7.7 million and five million own-brand motherboards respectively in 2012, the sources indicated.<p>

There were an estimated 28 million own-brand motherboards shipped in the China DIY market in 2012, accounting for 35% of the global total, the sources noted.</blockquote>

It's not clear whether these would be for OEMs who then make up PCs for retail sale, or enthusiasts building their own machines. Also of note: Intel is pulling out of the motherboard market.]]></description>
<dc:subject>motherboard pc intel</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:b8369b120334/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:motherboard"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:pc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:intel"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/print/9233039/Intel_working_on_48_core_chip_for_smartphones_tablets">
    <title>Intel working on 48-core chip for smartphones, tablets &gt;&gt; ComputerWorld</title>
    <dc:date>2012-11-04T22:01:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/print/9233039/Intel_working_on_48_core_chip_for_smartphones_tablets</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Intel researchers are working on a 48-core processor for smartphones and tablets, but it could be five to 10 years before it hits the market.<p>

"If we're going to have this technology in five to 10 years, we could finally do things that take way too much processing power today," said Patrick Moorhead, an analyst with Moor Insights and Strategy. "This could really open up our concept of what is a computer... The phone would be smart enough to not just be a computer but it could be my computer."</blockquote>

With 48 cores, you'd hope so. Then again - five to ten years? Seems a big margin of error. And Intel's still not knocking them over in smartphones.]]></description>
<dc:subject>computers intel smartphone</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:5c2115d76d47/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:computers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:intel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.anandtech.com/show/6355/intels-haswell-architecture">
    <title>Intel's Haswell Architecture analyzed: building a new PC and a new Intel &gt;&gt; Anandtech</title>
    <dc:date>2012-10-09T16:24:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.anandtech.com/show/6355/intels-haswell-architecture</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Haswell is so much more than just another new microprocessor architecture from Intel. For years Intel has enjoyed a wonderful position in the market. With its long term viability threatened, Haswell is the first step of a long term solution to the ARM problem. While Atom was the first "fast-enough" x86 micro-architecture from Intel, Haswell takes a different approach to the problem. Rather than working from the bottom up, Haswell is Intel's attempt to take its best micro-architecture and drive power as low as possible.</blockquote>

Allow plenty of time; there's a lot to read. (Thanks @rubbernuke for the link.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>intel haswell</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:7565e30e462d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:intel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:haswell"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20121002PR201.html">
    <title>Ultrabook shipments disappointing, IHS says &gt;&gt; Digitimes</title>
    <dc:date>2012-10-03T21:11:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20121002PR201.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>An estimated 10.3m ultrabooks will ship worldwide in 2012, according to IHS. This is down from the previous forecast issued earlier in 2012 of 22m units. In the newly-adjusted forecast for 2012, more than half of the shipments for the year are expected to come in the fourth quarter, the reasearch firm noted.</blockquote>

That's a big downrating. Ultrabooks really need Windows 8, and vice-versa (to a lesser extent).]]></description>
<dc:subject>intel ultrabooks windows windows8</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:8cd0c871b59b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:intel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ultrabooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:windows"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:windows8"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://newsroom.intel.com/community/intel_newsroom/blog/2012/09/26/intel-statement-in-response-to-unsubstantiated-news-reports">
    <title>Intel Statement in Response to Unsubstantiated News Reports &gt;&gt; Intel newsroom</title>
    <dc:date>2012-09-27T15:07:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://newsroom.intel.com/community/intel_newsroom/blog/2012/09/26/intel-statement-in-response-to-unsubstantiated-news-reports</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Today Intel Corporation issued a statement in response to unsubstantiated news reports about comments made by Intel CEO Paul Otellini in a meeting with employees.</blockquote>

The statement that follows completely fails to repudiate, refute or rebut the suggestion that Otellini did indeed say the things ascribed to him (to paraphrase, that he thought Windows 8 was shipping with too many fixes remaining to be done). It just says Intel and Microsoft have worked together a long time. That feels like at least halfway to confirmation.]]></description>
<dc:subject>intel pr</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:64f009ab0a2e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:intel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:pr"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.v3.co.uk/v3-uk/review/2207100/motorola-razr-i-review">
    <title>Motorola Razr I review &gt;&gt; V3.co.uk</title>
    <dc:date>2012-09-25T13:38:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.v3.co.uk/v3-uk/review/2207100/motorola-razr-i-review</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>A solid smartphone with crisp display, great battery life and speedy processor, let down only by occasional software glitches and a lack of built in internal storage.<p>
Pros: Decent performance, good battery life, solid design, operating system tweaks are positive <p>
Cons: Occasional software glitches cause stutter when navigating between screens, camera not as good as some competitors, relatively miserly built-in storage</blockquote> SIM-free price: £350.]]></description>
<dc:subject>intel smartphone mmi</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:c60c188c297c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:intel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:mmi"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://allthingsd.com/20120830/ultrabooks-still-racking-up-infra-sales/?mod=tweet">
    <title>Ultrabooks still racking up infra sales &gt;&gt; AllThingsD</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-30T17:45:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://allthingsd.com/20120830/ultrabooks-still-racking-up-infra-sales/?mod=tweet</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>According to new research from Barclays, Ultrabooks accounted for only about 5 percent of all laptops sold in the second quarter. That’s not even half of what the PC manufacturers who make them had been expecting. Clearly, Intel’s Ultrabook concept — which was supposed to prop up the PC market and win over consumers to whom Apple’s MacBook Air and iPad appeal — isn’t gaining quite the sort of traction the chip giant had hoped for.<p>
And that traction isn’t likely show up until PC manufacturers are able to lower their prices. According to Sterne Agee analyst Vijay Rakesh, 75 percent of the Ultrabooks currently available at Best Buy cost more than $950. Of those, several command prices of more than $1,300.</blockquote>

From February: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/audio/2012/feb/14/twitter-joke-trial-podcast">Intel's UK head interviewed about ultrabook expectations on Tech Weekly</a>. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>intel ultrabook</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:7e72a788590a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:intel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ultrabook"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20120809PD206.html">
    <title>Intel to try out wireless charging technology in ultrabooks and smartphones in 2H13 &gt;&gt; Digitimes</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-13T21:32:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20120809PD206.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Intel may adopt its self-developed wireless charging technology into Intel-based ultrabooks and smartphones in the second half of 2013, according to sources from the upstream supply chain.<p>

In addition to Intel, there are already several smartphone players and telecom carriers aggressively developing wireless charging technology. Japan-based NTT Docomo and Sharp both previously launched smartphones with wireless charging functions that meet the Wireless Power Consortium's (WPS) Qi standard, but high prices are still creating barriers that distance consumers, the sources noted.</blockquote>

Gotta love those upstream supply chain sources. Can you wait another year, especially as the HP TouchPad had it a year ago?]]></description>
<dc:subject>intel wireless</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:8089cea5099e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:intel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:wireless"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.fiercemobileit.com/story/lenovo-release-thinkpad-x1-carbon-business-ultrabook-august/2012-08-08">
    <title>Lenovo to release ThinkPad X1 Carbon business ultrabook in August &gt;&gt; FierceMobileIT</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-08T20:08:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.fiercemobileit.com/story/lenovo-release-thinkpad-x1-carbon-business-ultrabook-august/2012-08-08</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The new ultrabook is designed specifically to appeal to business users and includes a number of Lenovo's security apps and Intel's vPro technology. The new ultrabook is .71-inches thick and weighs in at 3 pounds. This is about twice as thick and twice as heavy as a third-generation iPad, but thinner and lighter than most ultrabooks.</blockquote>

Prices starting at $1,399 up to $1,849.]]></description>
<dc:subject>intel ultrabook lenovo</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:f2be5764ade0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:intel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ultrabook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:lenovo"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://img.ly/knAY">
    <title>Revenue for Apple, Microsoft, Intel and Google over the past 20 years &gt;&gt; Benedict Evans</title>
    <dc:date>2012-07-05T05:19:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://img.ly/knAY</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Simple comparison; tells an interesting story.]]></description>
<dc:subject>intel apple microsoft google</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:501a3b2cdb34/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:intel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:google"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.quora.com/Apple-Inc-2/How-does-Apple-keep-secrets-so-well/answer/Kim-Scheinberg?srid=i1">
    <title>Kim Scheinberg's answer to: Apple Inc.: How does Apple keep secrets so well? &gt;&gt; Quora</title>
    <dc:date>2012-06-11T07:38:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.quora.com/Apple-Inc-2/How-does-Apple-keep-secrets-so-well/answer/Kim-Scheinberg?srid=i1</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Amazing story. The finish: <blockquote>I've lost track of the many reasons that have been given for the switch to Intel, but this I know for sure:<p>

No one has ever reported that, for 18 months, Project Marklar existed only because a self-demoted engineer wanted his son Max to be able to live closer to Max's grandparents.</blockquote>

Quora, proving its worth.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple history intel mac</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:8f9524754e3f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:intel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:mac"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/04/18/taiwan_odm_ultrabook_ivy_bridge/">
    <title>Notebook makers hit hard in pre-Ivy Bridge lull &gt;&gt; The Register</title>
    <dc:date>2012-04-18T20:09:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/04/18/taiwan_odm_ultrabook_ivy_bridge/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Taiwanese ODMs which produce notebooks for some of the world’s biggest brands including Acer, Dell, HP and Lenovo are set to see shipments fall by up to 20% in April as the transition to Intel’s much anticipated Ivy Bridge platform takes hold.</p><p>

The new chips are set to land later in the month, but large scale shipments of notebooks based on the processors are not likely until the end of the quarter, according to Digitimes.</blockquote>

But expected to rise in May and June. You know what this means? New laptops in May.]]></description>
<dc:subject>laptops intel</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:a5e33ec531e0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:laptops"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:intel"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2012/04/intel-windows-8-tablet-specs/">
    <title>Intel's first Windows 8 tablet specs unveiled with fancy new chipsets &gt;&gt; Wired.com</title>
    <dc:date>2012-04-15T21:42:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2012/04/intel-windows-8-tablet-specs/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Nine-hour battery life, 3G or 4G connectivity (optional), "connected standby", 30-day standby, weight below 1.5lbs (0.7kg), <9mm thick. And: 10in or 11in screens. 

Let's see how closely they can stick to that; ultrabooks are already suffering specification creep (in a bad way). (Thanks @rquick for the link.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>tablets windows8 microsoft intel</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:cac3ccf437ab/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:tablets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:windows8"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:intel"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.netbooknews.com/43110/clover-trail-tablet-reference-design-with-32nm-chipset-video/">
    <title>Clover Trail Tablet Reference Design with 32nm Chipset [Video] | Netbooknews - Netbooks, Netbook Reviews, Smartbooks and more</title>
    <dc:date>2012-01-13T00:41:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.netbooknews.com/43110/clover-trail-tablet-reference-design-with-32nm-chipset-video/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Intel is showing off a reference design of their upcoming Clover Trail platform in a 10 inch tablet form factor.  Clover Trail should be released in the second half of 2012 and they appear to be on track to launch right along side Windows 8.]]></description>
<dc:subject>intel tablets windows8 ces2012</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:187021a08a18/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:intel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:tablets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:windows8"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ces2012"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.tested.com/news/ces-2012-intel-lays-out-its-2012-ultrabook-strategy-concept-laptops/3417/">
    <title>CES 2012: Intel Lays Out Its 2012 Ultrabook Strategy, Concept Laptops - Tested</title>
    <dc:date>2012-01-09T21:36:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.tested.com/news/ces-2012-intel-lays-out-its-2012-ultrabook-strategy-concept-laptops/3417/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Services such as PayPass—which will allow users to make payments by tapping their credit cards to the device using NFC—and Nuance speech recognition are being incorporated into new Intel partner devices. The goal, said the chip giant, is not only to produce thinner and lighter machines, but laptops that are both fast and capable too, thanks to Intel’s forthcoming Ivy Bridge chipset.]]></description>
<dc:subject>laptops intel ultrabooks ultrabook nfc nuance speechrecognition ces2012</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:bf0a8c1f93bd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:laptops"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:intel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ultrabooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ultrabook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:nfc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:nuance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:speechrecognition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ces2012"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arstechnica.com/hardware/news/2011/09/ultrabook-intels-300-million-plan-to-beat-apple-at-its-own-game.ars">
    <title>Ultrabook: Intel's $300m plan to beat Apple at its own game &gt;&gt; Ars Technica</title>
    <dc:date>2011-09-11T20:31:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arstechnica.com/hardware/news/2011/09/ultrabook-intels-300-million-plan-to-beat-apple-at-its-own-game.ars</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["My desktop isn't the only computer I plan to replace in the next few months. I need a new laptop too, and my goal is simple: to find a 13" MacBook Air that isn't made by Apple.<br />
"It turns out that I'm not the only one wanting this mythical non-Apple MacBook Air. Intel wants them too—it calls them Ultrabooks. The chip company has been kicking the Ultrabook idea around for a few months now, and it has grand ambitions: by the end of next year, it wants 40% of PC laptops to be Ultrabooks."<br />
<br />
To which end it has a $300m fund to "invest in companies that are working to build that kind of hardware - ultrathing, rapid boot, metal case, long battery life, long standby time.<br />
<br />
But as the article shows (and other analysts agree) that's not so easy. A really good examination of why the PC OEM business can do some things really well, but others far less well.]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlesarthur apple intel pc hardware</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:f08680227a1c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:intel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:pc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:hardware"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/07/28/intel_appup_program/">
    <title>Intel: Apple has online app sales exactly backwards &gt;&gt; The Register</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-29T05:53:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/07/28/intel_appup_program/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Apple may be having phenomenal success with its iOS App Store ecosystem, but Intel thinks it's going about online app sales in the wrong way.<br />
"As might be expected, Intel prefers its app-store-in-a-box AppUp program, which allows world+dog to create their own app stores using its software tools, then let Intel handle all the messy details such as collecting payments and delivering the software to customers, all for a 70/30 revenue split."<br />
<br />
Essentially Intel wants to let people build franchises, but take the same cut as Apple or Google does. Hard to see the real benefit of franchising your own app store.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple intel</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:f2cf88199241/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:intel"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.businessinsider.com/even-intel-is-betting-against-windows-with-android-push-2011-4?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">
    <title>Intel Betting Against Windows With Android Move &gt;&gt; Business Insider</title>
    <dc:date>2011-04-17T21:12:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.businessinsider.com/even-intel-is-betting-against-windows-with-android-push-2011-4?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Investors aren't the only ones betting on the decline of Microsoft Windows: Intel is working with Google and hardware partners to get its chips into a bunch of Android tablets this year.<br />
"PC makers like Asus had already said they were building Android tablets based on Atom, Intel's low-powered chip for portable devices.<br />
<br />
"But earlier this week, an Intel exec confirmed that its newest version of Atom -- previously codenamed Oak Trail -- will show up in tablets running Android 3.0 (Honeycomb) later this year."]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlesarthur android intel windows</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:3ecb950c0188/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:intel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:windows"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://venturebeat.com/2011/04/11/can-intel-atomize-arm-with-new-tablet-chips/">
    <title>Can Intel atomize ARM with new tablet chips? &gt;&gt; VentureBeat</title>
    <dc:date>2011-04-12T21:45:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://venturebeat.com/2011/04/11/can-intel-atomize-arm-with-new-tablet-chips/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Intel is taking on arch rival ARM today with the launch of new Intel Atom chips for tablet computers.<br />
"The Atom is a low-power version of Intel’s computer chips, and it is aimed squarely at tablets, netbooks, and smartphones. It represents the chip giant’s best chance to catch up with ARM, which dominates the mobile space with its power-efficient chip architecture and dozens of chip design partners.<br />
"Code-named Oak Trail, the new Intel Atom Z670 processor will appear in 35 tablet computers and other mobile devices this year, said Bill Kircos, general manager of marketing for Intel’s netbook and tablet group, in an interview."<br />
<br />
Bear in mind that if you see a headline that ends with a questionmark, it is usually correctly answered with "No".]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlesarthur intel arm</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:126b4474f385/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:intel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:arm"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>