<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (guardiantech)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from guardiantech</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://seriouspony.com/trouble-at-the-koolaid-point"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://valleywag.gawker.com/this-is-why-there-arent-enough-women-in-tech-1221929631"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2013/04/06/misogyny-sexism-and-why-rps-isnt-shutting-up/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://moebio.com/research/wikipediagender/#popular"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.dailydot.com/society/wikipedia-gender-gap-discussion/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-16533289"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fastcompany.com/1769217/there-are-no-secrets-from-twitter?partner=rss"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://seriouspony.com/trouble-at-the-koolaid-point">
    <title>Trouble at the Koolaid Point &gt;&gt; Serious Pony</title>
    <dc:date>2014-10-08T09:49:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://seriouspony.com/trouble-at-the-koolaid-point</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Kathy Sierra, who has (wearily) been experiencing online harassment since 2005, on how social media is now enabling and amplifying it: <blockquote class="quoted">The hater trolls are looking for their next dopamine hit. If you don’t provide it, they’ll try harder. But the escalation to get a response from you? That’s not even the worst escalation problem.

The more dangerous social-web-fueled gamification of trolling is the unofficial troll/hate leader-board. The attacks on you are often less about scoring points against you than that they’re trying to out-do one another. They’re trying to out-troll, out-hate, out-awful the other trolls. That’s their ultimate goal. He who does the worst wins.

Which may explain the slow, steady increase in both frequency and horror of online harassment. What was mostly drive-by nasty comments in 2001 then progressed to Photoshopped images (your child on a porn image is a particularly “fun” one), and what’s after images? Oh, yeah, the “beat up Anita” game. And what’s left when you’ve done as much digital damage as you can?

Real-life damage. </blockquote>

It's an important essay, which has a simple offering for its solution: "be nice". Everyone's capable of it.]]></description>
<dc:subject>twitter gender feminism harassment</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:33ff4131b7bb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:gender"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:feminism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:harassment"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://valleywag.gawker.com/this-is-why-there-arent-enough-women-in-tech-1221929631">
    <title>This is why there aren't enough women in tech &gt;&gt; Valleywag</title>
    <dc:date>2013-08-30T16:33:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://valleywag.gawker.com/this-is-why-there-arent-enough-women-in-tech-1221929631</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Last Friday, Valleywag published a post about the tech sector's <a href="http://valleywag.gawker.com/culture-fit-is-a-shitty-excuse-for-marginalizing-wome-1186914306">increasing abuse of the term “culture fit”</a> as a way to discriminate against potential hires who don't <a href="http://valleywag.gawker.com/major-fwd-us-donor-says-a-strong-foreign-accent-makes-1208418411">match the pattern</a> of a successful startup employee. It prompted an outpouring of responses from readers about their own abysmal experiences with the euphemism.</blockquote>

Must-read.]]></description>
<dc:subject>gender sexism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:3de89ef9c098/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:gender"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:sexism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2013/04/06/misogyny-sexism-and-why-rps-isnt-shutting-up/">
    <title>Misogyny, sexism, and why Rock,Paper, Shotgun isn’t shutting up &gt;&gt; Rock, Paper, Shotgun</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-07T19:37:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2013/04/06/misogyny-sexism-and-why-rps-isnt-shutting-up/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[John Walker, editor of the site: <blockquote>In having written about the subject of women and games over the years, I’ve received a significant amount of abuse. (I’m not going to fret about saying, “But of course not as bad as…”, because of course it’s not as bad as…) Most of the abuse I receive is lazy insults, and until recently I tended to assume them fairly innocuous. Some has been extreme, such as forum threads dedicated to associating my name with acts of child molestation to skew Google results, personal threats, and deeply personal insults. All of it has one purpose: to intimidate. Whether the purpose of the intimidation is because the person wants to read about new screenshots for a game and not gender politics, or because they are violently defending their privilege, it’s always about intimidation.</blockquote>

Powerful must-read.]]></description>
<dc:subject>games gaming gender sexism misogyny rockpapershotgun</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:df54007f23fc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:games"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:gaming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:gender"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:sexism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:misogyny"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:rockpapershotgun"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://moebio.com/research/wikipediagender/#popular">
    <title>Wikipedia Gender &gt;&gt; Moebio</title>
    <dc:date>2013-03-08T22:48:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://moebio.com/research/wikipediagender/#popular</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Interactive graphic showing which Wikipedia articles have more women than the average (where the average is 6.7 male editors per female editor).]]></description>
<dc:subject>wikipedia gender</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:8445475fc10e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:wikipedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:gender"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.dailydot.com/society/wikipedia-gender-gap-discussion/">
    <title>Wikipedia struggles to close the gender gap &gt;&gt; DailyDot</title>
    <dc:date>2012-03-23T06:22:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.dailydot.com/society/wikipedia-gender-gap-discussion/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Anyone with Web access can edit Wikipedia. However, only a small percentage of women take advantage of that privilege.

A look at the encyclopedia's <a href="https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Editor_Survey_Report_-_April_2011.pdf&amp;page=3">demographics</a> shows that 91% of its active editors are men, meaning just nine percent are women.

In commemoration of Women's History Month, a group of Wikipedia editors – both male and female – had a frank, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2012-03-12/Women_and_Wikipedia">round-table discussion</a> about how to make steps toward closing that gender gap. The chat was organised and written up by <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch">Sarah Stierch</a>, a Wikimedia Community Fellow who aims to bring more women and women&rsquo;s content to Wikipedia.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>gender wikipedia</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:1c48068b5f8b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:gender"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:wikipedia"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-16533289">
    <title>BBC News - 'Booth babes' stir controversy at 2012 CES</title>
    <dc:date>2012-01-13T00:47:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-16533289</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Some women at this year's Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas have expressed their frustration at the scantily-clad "booth babes" hired by some companies to promote their stalls.

The BBC's Matt Danzico investigates whether this practice is an effective marketing strategy, or merely a reflection on gender relations in technology.]]></description>
<dc:subject>ces2012 gender</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:647fd6ffefae/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ces2012"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:gender"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.fastcompany.com/1769217/there-are-no-secrets-from-twitter?partner=rss">
    <title>You can't keep your secrets from Twitter &gt;&gt; Fast Company</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-29T05:56:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/1769217/there-are-no-secrets-from-twitter?partner=rss</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["When you tweet--even if you tweet under a pseudonym--how much do you reveal about yourself? More than you realize, argues a new paper from researchers at the Mitre Corporation. The paper, "Discriminating Gender on Twitter," which is being presented this week at the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing in Scotland, demonstrates that machines can often figure out a person's gender on Twitter just by reading their tweets. And such knowledge is power: the findings could be useful to advertisers and others."<br />
<br />
Gender-skewed words for men: "http" and "google". For women: "chocolate" and "husband", among many others. Can an algorithm stereotype? Then again, it's right about 75% of the time at present.]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlesarthur twitter gender</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:17e232c4ea3d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:gender"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>