<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (guardiantech)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from guardiantech</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://torrentfreak.com/file-sharers-are-well-educated-and-earn-more-money-130615/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/onepercent/2012/09/honeytrap-catches-copyright-co.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/infringement-implementation/summary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://torrentfreak.com/anonymous-decentralized-and-uncensored-file-sharing-is-booming-120302/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/372247/file-sharing-acs-law-solicitor-fined-and-suspended"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/digital-living/5538576/Labour-about-face-on-three-strikes-net-law#share"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://torrentfreak.com/200000-bittorrent-users-sued-in-the-united-states-110808/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/12/us-limewire-idUSTRE74B78320110512"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.out-law.com//default.aspx?page=11901&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+out-law-NewsRoundUP+%28OUT-LAW+News-RoundUP%29"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://torrentfreak.com/file-sharers-are-well-educated-and-earn-more-money-130615/">
    <title>File-Sharers Are Well Educated and Earn More Money &gt;&gt; TorrentFreak</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-16T16:31:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://torrentfreak.com/file-sharers-are-well-educated-and-earn-more-money-130615/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Ernesto:

<blockquote>New research commissioned by the Australasian Performing Right Association reveals that Australian file-sharers are more affluent and better educated than their non-downloading counterparts. One in three Aussie Internet pirates earn more than $100,000 and one in four enjoyed a university education. The results further confirm that pirates tend to be relatively young, with 44% of file-sharers under 30 years of age.</blockquote>

Those pesky students! Although just as interesting is the reminder that TV shows are the most-pirated content in Australia, given previous reports that the country leads the world in torrented Game of Thrones downloads. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>piracy filesharing</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:233439f62b9a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:piracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:filesharing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/onepercent/2012/09/honeytrap-catches-copyright-co.html">
    <title>Honeytrap reveals mass monitoring of downloaders &gt;&gt; New Scientist</title>
    <dc:date>2012-09-05T21:21:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/onepercent/2012/09/honeytrap-catches-copyright-co.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Anyone who has downloaded pirated music, video or ebooks using a BitTorrent client has probably had their IP address logged by copyright-enforcement authorities within 3 hours of doing so. So say computer scientists who placed a fake pirate server online - and very quickly found monitoring systems checking out who was taking what from the servers.</blockquote>

Oooh.]]></description>
<dc:subject>bittorrent copyright filesharing</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:59a1771bdc2c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:bittorrent"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:filesharing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/infringement-implementation/summary">
    <title>Online Infringement of Copyright: Implementation of the Online Infringement of Copyright (Initial Obligations) (Sharing of Costs) Order 2012 &gt;&gt; Ofcom</title>
    <dc:date>2012-06-26T08:58:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/infringement-implementation/summary</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Here is Ofcom's proposals on the working of the Digital Economy Act. First letters expected to go out in March 2014 – yes, almost four years to the date when the bill was given Royal Assent.]]></description>
<dc:subject>digitaleconomyact piracy filesharing joshhalliday</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:93b0047da9e4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:digitaleconomyact"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:piracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:filesharing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:joshhalliday"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://torrentfreak.com/anonymous-decentralized-and-uncensored-file-sharing-is-booming-120302/">
    <title>Anonymous, decentralized and uncensored filesharing is booming &gt;&gt; TorrentFreak</title>
    <dc:date>2012-03-04T21:40:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://torrentfreak.com/anonymous-decentralized-and-uncensored-file-sharing-is-booming-120302/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The <a href="http://retroshare.sourceforge.net/">RetroShare</a> network allows people to create a private and encrypted file-sharing network. Users add friends by exchanging PGP certificates with people they trust. All the communication is encrypted using OpenSSL and files that are downloaded from strangers always go through a trusted friend.

In other words, it’s a true Darknet and virtually impossible to monitor by outsiders.

RetroShare founder DrBob told us that while the software has been around since 2006, all of a sudden there’s been a surge in downloads. “The interest in RetroShare has massively shot up over the last two months,” he said.</blockquote>

It's serverless, so it's like Limewire and other decentralised networks. But the PGP swapping is going to be a big hurdle; this isn't going to get big in a hurry.]]></description>
<dc:subject>filesharing privacy darknet</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:2f43fd00e4e8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:filesharing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:darknet"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/372247/file-sharing-acs-law-solicitor-fined-and-suspended">
    <title>File-sharing ACS Law solicitor fined and suspended &gt;&gt; PC Pro</title>
    <dc:date>2012-01-16T20:42:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/372247/file-sharing-acs-law-solicitor-fined-and-suspended</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Two-year ban and £70,000 fine for Mr Crossley. Wonder what will happen to the thousands of pounds allegedly duped out of people accused of illicit filesharing.]]></description>
<dc:subject>acslaw filesharing joshhalliday</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:910a58b5d1c5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:acslaw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:filesharing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:joshhalliday"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/digital-living/5538576/Labour-about-face-on-three-strikes-net-law#share">
    <title>Labour pledges to reverse section 29A's three strikes... &gt;&gt; Stuff.co.nz</title>
    <dc:date>2011-09-02T08:25:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/digital-living/5538576/Labour-about-face-on-three-strikes-net-law#share</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Three strikes filesharing rule comes into play in New Zealand: "The three-strikes regime is not expected to be widely used by rights holders, however, because of the high $25 fee they must pay to internet providers to forward those warnings to internet users and a $200 fee for bringing cases in front of the tribunal."]]></description>
<dc:subject>filesharing newzealand copyright joshhalliday</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:2edc23dee6d9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:filesharing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:newzealand"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:joshhalliday"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://torrentfreak.com/200000-bittorrent-users-sued-in-the-united-states-110808/">
    <title>200,000 BitTorrent Users Sued In The United States &gt;&gt; TorrentFreak</title>
    <dc:date>2011-08-09T06:27:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://torrentfreak.com/200000-bittorrent-users-sued-in-the-united-states-110808/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This seems a scaled up version of the speculative invoicing scheme mastered by ACS:Law – although these alleged filesharers apparently settle for $2,500 each on average.]]></description>
<dc:subject>bittorrent piracy filesharing joshhalliday</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:064fd191fd89/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:bittorrent"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:piracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:filesharing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:joshhalliday"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/12/us-limewire-idUSTRE74B78320110512">
    <title>LimeWire to pay record labels $105 million, ends suit &gt;&gt; Reuters</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-13T07:40:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/12/us-limewire-idUSTRE74B78320110512</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The operators of LimeWire agreed to pay record companies $105 million, ending a federal trial over copyright infringement damages owed by the once popular but now defunct file-sharing service."]]></description>
<dc:subject>limewire piracy filesharing joshhalliday</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:c0614d2dcee3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:limewire"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:piracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:filesharing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:joshhalliday"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.out-law.com//default.aspx?page=11901&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+out-law-NewsRoundUP+%28OUT-LAW+News-RoundUP%29">
    <title>IP addresses alone cannot be used to identify individuals, US judge says | Pinsent Masons LLP</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-05T13:39:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.out-law.com//default.aspx?page=11901&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+out-law-NewsRoundUP+%28OUT-LAW+News-RoundUP%29</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["An IP address on its own cannot be used to identify who has carried out activity on computer networks, a US judge has ruled. Judge Harold Baker, a federal judge in Illinois, denied a copyright holder the right to force internet service providers (ISPs) to hand over the address details of their subscribers."]]></description>
<dc:subject>filesharing piracy digitaleconomyact deact joshhalliday</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:81f2b55ecba0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:filesharing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:piracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:digitaleconomyact"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:deact"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:joshhalliday"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>