<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (guardiantech)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from guardiantech</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://winsupersite.com/mobile-devices/nook-samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.one37.net/blog/2012/1/5/doomed.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/23/business/media/23nook.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://winsupersite.com/mobile-devices/nook-samsung">
    <title>Nook + Samsung &gt;&gt; SuperSite for Windows</title>
    <dc:date>2014-06-05T21:48:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://winsupersite.com/mobile-devices/nook-samsung</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>For a while there it looked like Microsoft would either purchased Barnes & Noble's struggling Nook e-book reader business or partner with the firm to create Windows-based Nooks. But today, Barnes & Noble upended those possibilities in announcing a partnership with Samsung in which the consumer electronics giant will make future Nook tablets.

Some may see this as a blow to Microsoft and/or Windows. But I see this as bullet dodged: Let's face it, the last thing Microsoft needed was another money-losing hardware product line.

Certainly, for Barnes & Noble, this is a nice out, too, since it really couldn't afford to invest in the hardware lineup.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>nook samsung ereader</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:89e482a22e7a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:nook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ereader"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.one37.net/blog/2012/1/5/doomed.html">
    <title>E-readers: Doomed &gt;&gt; Matt Alexander</title>
    <dc:date>2012-01-05T22:38:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.one37.net/blog/2012/1/5/doomed.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Matt Alexander: "The e-reader becoming a 'fringe device' is precisely the point of yesterday's article. The difference is that I used the word 'doomed' (once in the title, once in the body). Why 'doomed' specifically? Well, when I think of healthy, flourishing products, I tend not to think of once-popular "fringe" devices.</p>

"Moreover, despite the many merits of e-ink in its current form - merits I've <a href="http://www.one37.net/blog/2011/11/18/kindle-touch-review.html">written about at length</a> in the past - the e-ink display is unquestionably life-limited. There is little that can be done to evolve the technology further. Sure, the current form is good for reading (and only for reading) - I do not question that - but it is very clear to me that there's only so much more that can be done before color and video become involved."]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlesarthur ereader</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:d2b9685aeac3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ereader"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/23/business/media/23nook.html">
    <title>Female Magazine Readers Flock to Nook Color &gt;&gt; NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-25T05:25:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/23/business/media/23nook.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The Nook Color has surprised publishers of women’s magazines like O, The Oprah Magazine, Cosmopolitan and Women’s Health by igniting strong sales that rival — and in some cases surpass — sales on the iPad.<br />
"The success was not so easily predictable for a device that has been on the market only since November and faces stiff competition from Apple, Amazon and the Android-based tablets."<br />
<br />
Not available in the UK, of course.]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlesarthur ereader tablet</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:021ecd75a182/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ereader"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:tablet"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>