<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (guardiantech)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from guardiantech</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-02-13/e-commerce-gives-a-lift-to-chinas-rural-farmers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://justin-singer.org/blog/2014/06/beautiful-illusions/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://nemoincognito.wordpress.com/2014/05/13/transport-regulation-if-this-were-finance-uber-would-be-behind-bars/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pando.com/2013/12/17/the-problem-with-ubers-surge-pricing-isnt-the-money-its-an-increasing-lack-of-trust/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/08/federal-judge-bitcoin-a-currency-can-be-regulated-under-american-law/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://techpinions.com/androids-market-share-is-literally-a-joke/16709"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/jaron_lanier_the_internet_destroyed_the_middle_class/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.leancrew.com/all-this/2013/04/quarterly-quiverings/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://broadstuff.com/archives/2532-The-first-Bitcoin-Crash.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.forbes.com/sites/pascalemmanuelgobry/2013/04/05/krugman-baby-sitting-co-op-bitcoin/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/22/us-china-volvo-idUSBRE92L04Q20130322"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.edmundconway.com/2013/03/simcity-its-a-bit-like-azerbaijan/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57468798-93/netflixs-lost-year-the-inside-story-of-the-price-hike-train-wreck/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://boxofficemojo.com/alltime/adjusted.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/04/how-computers-are-creating-a-second-economy-without-workers/255618/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://interconnected.org/home/2012/04/11/instagram_as_an_island_economy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.forbes.com/2000/10/09/1005malone.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/01/why-do-all-movie-tickets-cost-the-same/250762/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2011/12/24/china-makes-almost-nothing-out-of-apples-ipads-and-i/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://econerdfood.blogspot.com/2011/10/benfords-law-and-decreasing-reliability.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://highscalability.com/blog/2011/9/7/what-google-app-engine-price-changes-say-about-the-future-of.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-02-13/e-commerce-gives-a-lift-to-chinas-rural-farmers">
    <title>E-Commerce gives a lift to China's rural farmers &gt;&gt; Businessweek</title>
    <dc:date>2014-06-18T13:48:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-02-13/e-commerce-gives-a-lift-to-chinas-rural-farmers</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The online grocery, officially known as the Young Village Officials’ Farm, has customers in Beijing, Shanghai, and elsewhere, and about 10,000 followers on Weibo. Twenty-seven farms now fill orders, including that of Li and Cheng, who sell dried radishes. Customers place orders online, and Zhang visits farmers to inform them of the order and work out logistics and shipping. Zhang says the reason for their success is a renewed interest in local farming traditions—which she documents in lush photographs on social media—and strict quality control. Her team inspects harvests and literally throws out bad apples. “We prefer to work with farmers in mountainous regions with better natural environments,” she says.

In an area where the average monthly household income is only about 600 yuan ($99), farmers selling produce through the online grocery store can increase their income by a third, according to Zhang. The store’s most popular items include dried bamboo shoots, firm tofu, and jars of honey. Many of the farmers can’t read and have never used the Internet. But they can still reap the economic benefits of e-commerce with the help of younger villagers who “use the Internet on our phones,” says 20-year-old Mu Er, general manager of an inn in Bishan. Zhang sends Weibo postings from her Xiaomi smartphone.</blockquote>

This is the true benefit of smartphones and their internet access: bringing economic opportunity to people and places which would have been too remote and too poor for PCs and wired access.]]></description>
<dc:subject>smartphone china poverty economics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:d371970e0fbe/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:poverty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:economics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://justin-singer.org/blog/2014/06/beautiful-illusions/">
    <title>Beautiful illusions: the economics of uberX &gt;&gt; Justin Singer</title>
    <dc:date>2014-06-16T15:23:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://justin-singer.org/blog/2014/06/beautiful-illusions/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The story of the for-hire vehicle industry (FHV) has been one long march toward commoditization, with drivers always getting the short end of an increasingly smaller stick. Since the early 1900s, taxi drivers have morphed from employees (prior to deregulation) to independent contractor-lessors (following deregulation) to sole proprietors (following Uber).10 With each transformation, the industry has shifted profits away from the drivers while pushing onto them a greater share of costs and liabilities. This is why drivers tend to push for medallion systems: because only by capping the supply of vehicles can full-time drivers be assured a living wage. Market equilibrium in a wholly deregulated taxi industry comes only when the desperate have driven out the good. The result is something that few cities would prefer to the imperfect gnarl that is a regulated taxi market.

I recognize that it’s not exactly in fashion to side with regulation over laissez faire, and in many instances, I wouldn’t. There are limits to markets, however, and the taxi industry presents an especially vivid example of that dynamic.</blockquote>

He also goes very precisely into the finances - which show that Uber isn't a magic money tree for taxi drivers; instead they'll still be worse off (perhaps on longer hours) than "official" taxis. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>business economics uber charlesarthur</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:fb038ec189c1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:uber"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://nemoincognito.wordpress.com/2014/05/13/transport-regulation-if-this-were-finance-uber-would-be-behind-bars/">
    <title>Transport regulation: if this were finance, Uber would be behind bars &gt;&gt; Nemo's Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-14T20:34:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://nemoincognito.wordpress.com/2014/05/13/transport-regulation-if-this-were-finance-uber-would-be-behind-bars/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>There are other services out there that provide smartphone bookings to Taxis and do not flount the law: Ingogo, Gocatch, Hailo and others. The problem is that at this point in time not breaking the law is a major competitive disadvantage due to the numbers above and regulators seem to be in Uber’s sweet spot of being too gutless or incompetent to regulate similar businesses in a similar way by getting rid of exorbitant rents, ensuring whatever safety / quality of concerns they have are addressed and then letting the market sort itself out. The confused response of the [New South Wales, Australia] state government to Uber adopting a Lyft like model is case in point.

It will be very sad if regulators cannot see the forest for the trees here and do the right thing – it will set a precedent of telling regulators to get stuffed, getting away with it and being handsomely remunerated. I run an asset management business: I am guessing that if I decided I didn’t want to file reports because I thought the filings were poorly formatted, arbitrary and of marginal value to regulators (they often are) then that would not go down too well even if I was right and made sensible suggestions about how “this would all be way better with my new API”. Why is the regulation of finance so deadly serious and transport such a joke? To that end Transport regulators need to answer a few questions.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>analysis economics australia</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:ef2ee0cba742/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:analysis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:australia"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://pando.com/2013/12/17/the-problem-with-ubers-surge-pricing-isnt-the-money-its-an-increasing-lack-of-trust/">
    <title>The problem with Uber’s surge pricing isn’t the money. It’s an increasing lack of trust &gt;&gt; PandoDaily</title>
    <dc:date>2013-12-18T07:19:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://pando.com/2013/12/17/the-problem-with-ubers-surge-pricing-isnt-the-money-its-an-increasing-lack-of-trust/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Uber is the supply-and-demand-in-an-Ayn-Randian-world cab company which hikes prices if there's a "surge" of demand. But Sarah Lacy's not happy: <blockquote>In San Francisco, I usually walk to and from work, but lately I’ve been grabbing an UberX home. It’s a way for me to avoid pricey San Francisco parking in the mid-Market area and was always $7 including tip.<p>

In the last few weeks, however, I’ve been charged surge pricing almost every time I’ve left work. There’s no storm. No rain. It’s merely rush hour. Sometimes that $7 ride has ballooned to more than $30. I was OK with it once. Twice even. But it’s become a pattern. I have no insight into what’s driving it, and if it’s going to continue to happen almost everyday with no explanation. Suddenly Uber isn’t a reliable bargain over taking my car.</blockquote>

Someone's being taken for a ride, certainly.]]></description>
<dc:subject>uber pricing economics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:291685936f6e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:uber"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:pricing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:economics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/08/federal-judge-bitcoin-a-currency-can-be-regulated-under-american-law/">
    <title>Federal judge: Bitcoin, “a currency,” can be regulated under American law &gt;&gt; Ars Technica</title>
    <dc:date>2013-08-08T21:51:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/08/federal-judge-bitcoin-a-currency-can-be-regulated-under-american-law/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The determination is necessary so the US government can try the memorably-named Trendon Shavers on charges of having run a Ponzi (pyramid) scheme for his "Bitcoin Savings & Trust" (BTCST) operation. Because you can't run a Ponzi scheme involving coloured beads, for example.

Here's what the judge said: <blockquote>Shavers argues that the BTCST investments are not securities because Bitcoin is not money, and is not part of anything regulated by the United States. Shavers also contends that his transactions were all Bitcoin transactions and that no money ever exchanged hands. The SEC argues that the BTCST investments are both investment contracts and notes, and, thus, are securities.<p>

…It is clear that Bitcoin can be used as money. It can be used to purchase goods or services, and as Shavers stated, used to pay for individual living expenses. The only limitation of Bitcoin is that it is limited to those places that accept it as currency. However, it can also be exchanged for conventional currencies, such as the U.S. dollar, Euro, Yen, and Yuan. Therefore, Bitcoin is a currency or form of money, and investors wishing to invest in BTCST provided an investment of money.</blockquote>

That's a precedent.]]></description>
<dc:subject>bitcoin currency economics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:716d448ff497/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:bitcoin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:currency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:economics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://techpinions.com/androids-market-share-is-literally-a-joke/16709">
    <title>Android’s market share is literally a joke &gt;&gt;Tech.pinions</title>
    <dc:date>2013-05-23T16:49:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://techpinions.com/androids-market-share-is-literally-a-joke/16709</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[John Kirk: <blockquote>Android accounts for approximately 70% of global smartphone shipments and 29% of global profits. This means that the average Android manufacturer creates just 0.41% of profit for each point of market share (0.29/0.70 = 0.414). In other words, the average Android manufacturer needs to capture 2.4 points of market share just to increase their [share of] market profit by 1 percentage point.<p>
Such a low fair share profit index may indicate that Android manufacturers are:<br />– Having difficulty differentiating their product;<br />– Sacrificing profits in order to buy market share (the “race to the bottom”);<br />
– Unable to reach <a href="http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/05/09/teardown-finds-samsung-galaxy-s4-more-costly-to-build-than-apples-iphone-5">economies of scale in the manufacturing process</a>.</blockquote>

Kirk's point is that people who talk about low-cost iPhones are overlooking price elasticity. Although might he be overlooking the fact that the sector of the market which is price inelastic has been almost exhausted?]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple economics iphone android</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:8529c74fe269/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/jaron_lanier_the_internet_destroyed_the_middle_class/">
    <title>Jaron Lanier: The Internet destroyed the middle class &gt;&gt; Salon.com</title>
    <dc:date>2013-05-14T21:04:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/jaron_lanier_the_internet_destroyed_the_middle_class/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>This week sees the publication of “Who Owns the Future?,” which digs into technology, economics and culture in unconventional ways. (How is a pirated music file like a 21st century mortgage?) Lanier argues that there is little essential difference between Facebook and a digital trading company, or Amazon and an enormous bank. (“Stanford sometimes seems like one of the Silicon Valley companies.”)<p>

Much of the book looks at the way Internet technology threatens to destroy the middle class by first eroding employment and job security, along with various “levees” that give the economic middle stability.<p>

“Here’s a current example of the challenge we face,” he writes in the book’s prelude: “At the height of its power, the photography company Kodak employed more than 14,000 people and was worth $28 billion. They even invented the first digital camera. But today Kodak is bankrupt, and the new face of digital photography has become Instagram. When Instagram was sold to Facebook for a billion dollars in 2012, it employed only 13 people. Where did all those jobs disappear? And what happened to the wealth that all those middle-class jobs created?”</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>economics internet technology lanier</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:2070a76ee58e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:lanier"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.leancrew.com/all-this/2013/04/quarterly-quiverings/">
    <title>Quarterly quiverings &gt;&gt; All this</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-24T19:55:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.leancrew.com/all-this/2013/04/quarterly-quiverings/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Doctor Drang": <blockquote>I don’t use a Mac or an iPhone because of Apple’s balance sheet. I use them because they (usually) work for me, and I save my anger and frustration for when they don’t. I’m far more affected by an iCloud screwup than by the iPhone’s market share, by Lion’s removal of Save As… than by Apple’s stock price, and by Preview’s lack of AppleScript support than by anything Rob Enderle says.</blockquote>

Applescript for Preview would be awesome.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple economics software</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:8b69ae4c9106/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:software"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://broadstuff.com/archives/2532-The-first-Bitcoin-Crash.html">
    <title>The first Bitcoin Crash &gt;&gt; broadstuff</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-10T21:01:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://broadstuff.com/archives/2532-The-first-Bitcoin-Crash.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The price of a Bitcoin climbed slowly but steadily until May, when Gawker and the tech blog Launch published two big stories about the phenomenon. Prices started zigzagging up, hitting a high of $33.11 last week after three weeks of increasingly frenzied trading, and then fell a spectacular 30 percent Friday morning, what the blogs dubbed “Digital Black Friday.” As of now—3 p.m. Tuesday—a Bitcoin can be had for around $18.</blockquote>

That was May 2011. Sorry, wasn't that clear?]]></description>
<dc:subject>bitcoin business currency economics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:4e353fad395c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:bitcoin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:currency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:economics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.forbes.com/sites/pascalemmanuelgobry/2013/04/05/krugman-baby-sitting-co-op-bitcoin/">
    <title>This 1998 Paul Krugman column perfectly explains the design flaw at the heart of Bitcoin &gt;&gt; Forbes</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-05T22:09:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.forbes.com/sites/pascalemmanuelgobry/2013/04/05/krugman-baby-sitting-co-op-bitcoin/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry: <blockquote>Bitcoin’s algorithm states that at some point the total supply of Bitcoin will be capped at around 21 million. Bitcoin users create more bitcoin by “mining” it (running software on their computer), but Bitcoin’s algorithm states that the rate at which Bitcoin can grow will slow down asymptotically to close to zero, such that the supply of Bitcoin will essentially be fixed.<p>

Why is that a problem?<p>

To understand that, you just have to read what may be the most famous column by Nobel-prize winning economist Paul Krugman: the baby-sitting co-op.</blockquote>

Understand the co-op example, he says, and you understand monetary policy. And then you understand why Bitcoin is fatally flawed. It's not fixable for Bitcoin, but could be fixed for another cryptocurrency.]]></description>
<dc:subject>bitcoin economics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:e3e847e220c9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:bitcoin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:economics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/22/us-china-volvo-idUSBRE92L04Q20130322">
    <title>Dealer cheating causes havoc at Volvo's China unit &gt;&gt; Reuters</title>
    <dc:date>2013-03-25T14:59:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/22/us-china-volvo-idUSBRE92L04Q20130322</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Swedish auto maker Volvo has uncovered widespread cheating by its car dealers in China, where retailers inflated sales to win cash rebates from the company for hitting volume targets.<p>
An investigation by the struggling, Chinese-owned car maker uncovered thousands of fake sales booked in 2011 - but also an under-reporting of sales in 2012 to make the books balance. That meant it actually performed better last year than it had thought, according to a senior Volvo executive.</blockquote>

Shipped v sold.]]></description>
<dc:subject>economics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:4398fa8f210d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:economics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.edmundconway.com/2013/03/simcity-its-a-bit-like-azerbaijan/">
    <title>SimCity: &quot;It's a bit like Azerbaijan&quot; &gt;&gt; The Real Economy</title>
    <dc:date>2013-03-03T22:22:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.edmundconway.com/2013/03/simcity-its-a-bit-like-azerbaijan/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Edmund Conway: <blockquote>They were considering setting up an international capital market for government finance. In previous games you could, as a mayor, issue bonds to raise money for projects (the interest rate would increase depending on how indebted you were). This time around, the team considered creating an online market buying and selling these bonds, raising the prospect that a city could face a debt crisis, could go bankrupt and could, in turn, cause a financial collapse across the entire global economy (of SimCity cities).<p>
“We were kicking it around,” said Quigley. “We even thought about having credit ratings. But then we figured: let’s worry about roads and bridges first off, and worry about secondary stuff later.”</blockquote>

No fusion reactors, apparently.]]></description>
<dc:subject>simcity economics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:d79b6282fdf8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:simcity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:economics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57468798-93/netflixs-lost-year-the-inside-story-of-the-price-hike-train-wreck/">
    <title>Netflix's lost year: The inside story of the price-hike train wreck &gt;&gt; CNET News</title>
    <dc:date>2012-07-11T21:29:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57468798-93/netflixs-lost-year-the-inside-story-of-the-price-hike-train-wreck/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>One year ago tomorrow, CEO Reed Hastings took the first of a series of missteps that angered customers and nearly derailed his company. Current and former employees disclose what went wrong.</blockquote>

Inside a management screwup.]]></description>
<dc:subject>netflix economics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:626674756c6d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:netflix"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:economics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://boxofficemojo.com/alltime/adjusted.htm">
    <title>All-time US box office takings by film, adjusted for ticket price inflation &gt;&gt; Box Office Mojo</title>
    <dc:date>2012-06-06T22:17:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://boxofficemojo.com/alltime/adjusted.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[OK, it's not tech, but it's fascinating to see how good stories tend to win here. See if you can guess which is top before you click. (Hint: it's not Titanic.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>economics film history movies</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:d64900e951a2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:film"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:movies"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/04/how-computers-are-creating-a-second-economy-without-workers/255618/">
    <title>How computers are creating a second economy without workers &gt;&gt; The Atlantic</title>
    <dc:date>2012-04-15T21:14:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/04/how-computers-are-creating-a-second-economy-without-workers/255618/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>When the disappointing jobs numbers were reported last week (employers added 120,000 jobs in March, about half the number reported in the two previous months), analysts tripped over themselves looking for an explanation. Of course, jobs numbers are bound to vary, but in my view the long-term trend calls for more jobs to disappear, and the reason is clear as day: the exploding Second Economy.</p><p>

The Second Economy -- a term the economist Brian Arthur uses to describe the computer-intensive portion of the economy -- is, quite simply, the virtual economy. One of its main byproducts is the replacement of low-productivity workers with computers. It's growing by leaps and bounds, brimming with optimistic entrepreneurs, and spawning a new generation of billionaires. In fact, the booming Second Economy will probably drive much of the economic growth in the coming decades.</blockquote>

The definition remains slippery, though: is EasyJet or Amazon a "second economy" company? Lots of what happens is achieved by humans; it couldn't happen without them. Instagram or Google are more like a "second economy" company, surely: far more automated.]]></description>
<dc:subject>economics technology</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:0dd78eab333b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:technology"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://interconnected.org/home/2012/04/11/instagram_as_an_island_economy">
    <title>Instagram as an island economy &gt;&gt; Interconnected</title>
    <dc:date>2012-04-11T08:25:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://interconnected.org/home/2012/04/11/instagram_as_an_island_economy</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Matt Webb of Berg: <blockquote>The other day I picked some choice quotes from 'Marx at 193' (an article by John Lanchester). Here's one: This idea of labour being hidden in things, and the value of things arising from the labour congealed inside them, is an unexpectedly powerful explanatory tool in the digital world.</p><p>

What is the labour encoded in Instagram? It's easy to see. </blockquote>

We've until now been missing a Marxist analysis of the Instagram takeover.]]></description>
<dc:subject>economics facebook instagram</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:12b7f6baf725/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:instagram"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.forbes.com/2000/10/09/1005malone.html">
    <title>Apple R.I.P. &gt;&gt; Forbes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2012-03-11T20:55:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.forbes.com/2000/10/09/1005malone.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Note that this isn't contemporary. In fact, see if you can guess when Michael Malone wrote it before clicking through: <blockquote>But with falling profits and plummeting stock, and having hastened the end of the desktop PC era, Steve Jobs has put Apple again in a precarious position. When the end does come, the big companies will have the necessary capital to transition into the multitude of new industries that will evolve out of the PC. The products of these new markets will be, thanks to Apple, stylish and beautiful. What an irony it will be if Apple, cranking out ever-less profitable commodity iMacs, its stock depressed, cannot afford to follow.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple business economics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:55ffca08c093/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:economics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/01/why-do-all-movie-tickets-cost-the-same/250762/">
    <title>Why do all movie tickets Cost the same? &gt;&gt; The Atlantic</title>
    <dc:date>2012-01-04T22:46:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/01/why-do-all-movie-tickets-cost-the-same/250762/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Like tens of millions of Americans, I have paid money to see Mission: Impossible, which made $130 million in the last two weeks, and I have not paid any money to see Young Adult, which has made less than $10 million over the same span. Nobody is surprised or impressed by the discrepancy. The real question is: If demand is supposed to move prices, why isn't seeing Young Adult much cheaper than seeing Mission: Impossible?"<br /><br />We seem to remember Stelios trying to use his "book early" system for cinemas and being completely frozen out a couple of years ago.]]></description>
<dc:subject>economics money movies charlesarthur</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:e1856bd88dec/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:money"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:movies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2011/12/24/china-makes-almost-nothing-out-of-apples-ipads-and-i/">
    <title>China Makes Almost Nothing Out of Apple's iPads and iPhones - Forbes</title>
    <dc:date>2012-01-01T22:28:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2011/12/24/china-makes-almost-nothing-out-of-apples-ipads-and-i/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Tom Worstall: "My favorite fact of this past year was the proof that China makes almost nothing out of assembling Apple‘s iPads and iPhones. It’s a favorite because it speaks so directly to one of the great political arguments going on in both the US and the UK. I refer, of course, to this very strange idea that both countries would get (even) richer if only they would do more manufacturing."

Then again, is it "manufacturing" or "assembly" that China does?]]></description>
<dc:subject>china ipod manufacturing economics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:1a9579c52918/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ipod"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:manufacturing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:economics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://econerdfood.blogspot.com/2011/10/benfords-law-and-decreasing-reliability.html">
    <title>Benford's Law and the decreasing reliability of accounting data for US firms &gt;&gt;  Studies in Everyday Life:</title>
    <dc:date>2011-10-29T21:28:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://econerdfood.blogspot.com/2011/10/benfords-law-and-decreasing-reliability.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[
                
                    Things are bad, in short. Benford's Law is like fingerprinting for financial fraud, given enough digits.
                
            ]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlesarthur benford economics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:46a8e5d16cf2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:benford"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:economics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://highscalability.com/blog/2011/9/7/what-google-app-engine-price-changes-say-about-the-future-of.html">
    <title>What Google App Engine price changes say about the future &gt;&gt; High Scalability blog of Web Architecture</title>
    <dc:date>2011-09-08T21:40:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://highscalability.com/blog/2011/9/7/what-google-app-engine-price-changes-say-about-the-future-of.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Google App Engine has changed its pricing model. "Pay for what you use has changed. From an abstract resource driven model, where pricing is pegged to actual CPU usage, GAE is moving to an instance driven model, in the Amazon style, where pricing is pegged to the fully burdened cost of real physical assets (see the FAQ for details). Estimates range from between 2x to 10+x cost increases for running on GAE with the new pricing scheme.<br />
"Dead easy has changed. Pricing is just part of the story. GAE still delivers on its zero platform maintenance pledge, but much more pressure is being put on programmers to navigate the new pricing model and recode to a complex moving target in order to minimize costs. It's no longer that simple to use. Work has shifted to clever programming."]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlesarthur google economics cloud</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:79bf41620f39/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:charlesarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:cloud"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>