<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (guardiantech)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from guardiantech</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://uncrunched.com/2014/03/21/google-spied-gmail/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://uncrunched.com/2012/04/09/about-pando/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://techcrunch.com/2011/09/06/editorial-independence/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/sep/02/techcrunch-eidtor-michael-arrington-steps-down"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://uncrunched.com/2014/03/21/google-spied-gmail/">
    <title>About that time Google spied on my Gmail &gt;&gt; Uncrunched</title>
    <dc:date>2014-03-21T22:25:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://uncrunched.com/2014/03/21/google-spied-gmail/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Michael Arrington: <blockquote>As the Guardian points out, other email providers also reserve the right to do this [scanning of emails to protect their 'property'] in their terms of service.<p>

I have first hand knowledge of this. A few years ago, I’m nearly certain that Google accessed my Gmail account after I broke a major story about Google.<p>

A couple of weeks after the story broke my source, a Google employee, approached me at a party in person in a very inebriated state and said that they (I’m being gender neutral here) had been asked by Google if they were the source. The source denied it, but was then shown an email that proved that they were the source.</blockquote>

It's a very serious claim; we'll see how this develops.]]></description>
<dc:subject>google gmail arrington</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:cb246d82cfba/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:gmail"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:arrington"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://uncrunched.com/2012/04/09/about-pando/">
    <title>About Pando &gt;&gt; Uncrunched</title>
    <dc:date>2012-04-11T05:23:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://uncrunched.com/2012/04/09/about-pando/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Michael Arrington: <blockquote>Some of you may have read Sarah Lacy's <a href="http://pandodaily.com/2012/04/09/investor-update/">post today</a> stating that I'm no longer on the board of Pando Daily.</p>
<p>This wasn't a complete surprise to me, the company notified me last week that they weren't happy that I and MG Siegler (my partner at CrunchFund) were <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2012/04/04/im-back/">going to speak</a> at TechCrunch Disrupt this coming May.</p>
<p>Part of the reason that I'm speaking at Disrupt is that I have a contractual commitment to do so as part of my <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/09/12/deciding-to-move-on/">break</a> with them last year, which Sarah knew about before our involvement in Pando. But MG and I are also speaking there because we still love TechCrunch. And we both speak at many other conferences as well.</blockquote>

Hints of trouble in paradise. (<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/feb/26/blogger-journalist-silicon-valley-dan-lyons">Read this</a> if you need reminders on Techcrunch and Pandodaily.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>techcrunch pandodaily arrington</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:a098b6ceab89/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:techcrunch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:pandodaily"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:arrington"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://techcrunch.com/2011/09/06/editorial-independence/">
    <title>Editorial Independence &gt;&gt; TechCrunch</title>
    <dc:date>2011-09-07T07:28:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://techcrunch.com/2011/09/06/editorial-independence/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Michael Arrington issues an ultimatum to his new employer: "We’ve proposed two options to Aol.<br />
<br />
1. Reaffirmation of the editorial independence promised at the time of acquisition. Given the current circumstances, that means autonomy from Huffington Post, unfettered editorial independence and a blanket right to editorial self determination. To put it simply, TechCrunch would stay with Aol but would be independent of the Huffington Post.<br />
<br />
or<br />
<br />
2. Sell TechCrunch back to the original shareholders."<br />
<br />
Popcorn?]]></description>
<dc:subject>arrington techcrunch aol joshhalliday</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:596dd4da34b5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:arrington"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:techcrunch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:aol"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:joshhalliday"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/sep/02/techcrunch-eidtor-michael-arrington-steps-down">
    <title>TechCrunch editor Michael Arrington steps down &gt;&gt; Guardian</title>
    <dc:date>2011-09-02T07:47:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/sep/02/techcrunch-eidtor-michael-arrington-steps-down</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Arrington will partner with many well-known Silicon Valley venture capitalists – including Digg-founder Kevin Rose, Yuri Milner, Marc Andreessen, Ben Horowiz, and Accel Partners – to invest between $100,000 and $200,000 in fledgling internet firms."]]></description>
<dc:subject>arrington techcrunch joshhalliday</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:557a115767ca/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:arrington"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:techcrunch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:joshhalliday"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>