<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (guardiantech)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from guardiantech</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2014/09/29/the-european-commission-is-not-about-to-fine-apple-nor-even-to-accuse-the-company-of-anything/?partner=yahootix"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.aclu.org/blog/technology-and-liberty/apple-throws-down-privacy-gauntlet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.watchesbysjx.com/2014/09/what-watch-industry-thinks-of-apple.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qz.com/259433/the-people-camping-outside-the-apple-store-want-more-than-the-iphone-6/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2014/09/02Apple-Media-Advisory.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anandtech.com/show/8456/the-road-ahead"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.latimes.com/local/education/la-me-deasy-ipads-20140826-story.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/apple_mark_gurman_9to5mac.php?nomobile=1"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://nfb.org/blog/vonb-blog/comments-apple-and-nfb-resolution-2014-12"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://online.wsj.com/articles/tim-cooks-apple-takes-shape-1404757939?mod=LS1"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20140704005050/en/TrendForce-Global-Tablet-Shipments-Expected-Reach-205#.U7rT0I1dVbg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rustyshelf.org/2014/07/01/io-thoughts/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.apertureexpert.com/tips/2014/6/28/comment-follow-demise-aperture#.U7EwTY1dVbj"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ben-evans.com/benedictevans/2014/6/4/digesting-wwdc-cloudy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.beyonddevic.es/2014/06/05/what-winning-means-for-apple/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.counterpointresearch.com/applebasebandbcom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://duck.co/blog/safari"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press_Releases/2014/6/comScore_Reports_April_2014_US_Smartphone_Subscriber_Market_Share"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onbitcoin.com/2014/06/02/apple-allows-bitcoin-apps-in-app-store/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2014/06/where-apple-got-inspiration-for-7-of-its-big-wwdc-ideas/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://counternotions.com/2008/07/16/bet-iphone/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.theinformation.com/Why-Beats-is-a-Great-Buy-for-Apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.apple.com/pr/library/2014/05/28Apple-to-Acquire-Beats-Music-Beats-Electronics.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.asymco.com/2014/05/28/questions-for-eddy-cue-and-craig-federighi/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1bef71b8-e433-11e3-a73a-00144feabdc0.html?siteedition=uk#axzz32r6UZ6gg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.macrumors.com/2014/05/25/apple-software-update-invalid/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2014/05/20/apple-samsung-settlement-talks-bogus/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.counterpointresearch.com/q12014marketmonitorvalue"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.counterpointresearch.com/q12014marketmonitor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/05/17/us-apple-google-settlement-idUSBREA4F0S020140517"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://9to5mac.com/2014/05/14/likely-iphone-6-with-sharper-larger-1704-x-960-resolution-screen-in-testing/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://9to5mac.com/2014/05/13/apple-plans-to-match-microsoft-surface-with-split-screen-ipad-multitasking-in-ios-8/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.edisonresearch.com/home/archives/2014/05/why-radio-and-music-should-take-the-itunesbeats-deal-seriously.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/apple-plans-release-iphone-6-august-report-article-1.1786430"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/06/apple-beats_n_2815676.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.vanityfair.com/business/2014/06/apple-samsung-smartphone-patent-war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.electronista.com/articles/14/04/14/might.theoretically.be.justified.by.larger.screen.size/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://9to5mac.com/2014/04/09/jony-ive-shakes-up-apples-software-design-group-iphone-interface-creator-greg-christie-departing/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.imore.com/there-wont-be-another-iphone-not-apple-not-anyone-not-long-time-yet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/04/04/microsoft-office-for-the-ipad-its-delightfully-familiar/?_php=true&amp;_type=blogs&amp;action=click&amp;contentCollection=Technology&amp;region=Footer&amp;module=Recommendation&amp;src=recg&amp;pgtype=Blogs&amp;_r=0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/03/30/meet-lucy-h-koh-a-silicon-valley-judge/?_php=true&amp;_type=blogs&amp;_php=true&amp;_type=blogs&amp;partner=yahoofinance&amp;_r=1"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?id=20140323000031&amp;cid=1206"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.welivesecurity.com/2014/03/21/10-years-of-mac-os-x-malware/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://qz.com/190600/why-apple-cant-match-googles-nosy-new-smartwatches/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://9to5mac.com/2014/03/17/this-is-healthbook-apples-first-major-step-into-health-fitness-tracking/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/516fad4c-a91b-11e3-bf0c-00144feab7de.html?siteedition=uk#axzz2wIfDdIhO"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://time.com/jonathan-ive-apple-interview/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeworld.com/security/23099/samsung-knox-2-iOS-7-enterprise-security?page=0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://9to5mac.com/2014/03/11/ios-8-apple-polishes-maps-data-adds-public-transit-directions-service/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://chitika.com/insights/2014/ios-706-by-device"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://spylockout.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://techland.time.com/2014/02/21/ios-vs-android-2/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7281378"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-said-demanding-iphone-logos-covered-at-olympics-opening-ceremony-05315780/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23744"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://9to5mac.com/2013/10/31/apple-testing-mail-update-for-os-x-mavericks-to-fix-several-issues/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://9to5mac.com/2013/10/30/apple-says-fix-incoming-for-13-inch-retina-macbook-pro-trackpad-keyboard-issues-offers-interim-solution/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.macrumors.com/2013/10/30/space-gray-iphone-5s-most-popular-amid-supply-constraints-blue-leads-for-iphone-5c/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/10/apple-claim-that-icloud-can-store-passwords-only-locally-seems-to-be-false/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neglectedpotential.com/2013/10/iphone-touchscreen-accuracy/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/10/27/another-daylight-saving-time-bug-strikes-apples-ios-7-affects-calendar-display"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://9to5mac.com/2013/10/28/recent-ios-updates-simplify-burst-mode-camera-feature-in-iphone-5s-helps-users-save-storage-space/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pxlnv.com/linklog/idiot/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/blogs/a1a33778-88b7-452a-9133-c955812f8910/entry/why_a_former_apple_hater_thinks_all_byod_devices_should_be_ios?lang=en"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://techpinions.com/its-tough-competing-with-the-iphone/23835"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://linkback.morganstanley.com/web/sendlink/webapp/f/nc4berli-3op4-g000-9283-002655211000?store=0&amp;d=TAAwAG5jNGJlcmxpLTNvcDQtZzAwMC05MjgzLTAwMjY1NTIxMTAwMA%3D%3D&amp;user=3eqgvy4t1sm63-0&amp;__gda__=1506131151_255f4cb56c165a3116d1e2216cd71671"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/06/magazine/and-then-steve-said-let-there-be-an-iphone.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fosspatents.com/2013/10/sanctions-loom-large-samsung-execs-were.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/iphone-ios-7-aiding-the-police-with-fingerprint-technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeworld.com/mobile/22481/ios-7-volume-licensing-apps-business"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2014/09/29/the-european-commission-is-not-about-to-fine-apple-nor-even-to-accuse-the-company-of-anything/?partner=yahootix">
    <title>The European Commission is not about to fine Apple; nor even to accuse the company of anything &gt;&gt; Forbes</title>
    <dc:date>2014-09-29T13:57:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2014/09/29/the-european-commission-is-not-about-to-fine-apple-nor-even-to-accuse-the-company-of-anything/?partner=yahootix</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Tim Worstall: <blockquote class="quoted">There has been no finding of fact and no finding of illegality. That just isn’t the way that European Commission investigations work. Just not how they do their public policy.

The FT claimed: <blockquote>Apple will be accused of prospering from illegal tax deals with the Irish government for more than two decades when Brussels this week unveils details of a probe that could leave the iPhone maker with a record fine of as much as several billions of euros.

Preliminary findings from the European Commission’s investigation into Apple’s tax affairs in Ireland, where it has had a rate of less than 2 per cent, claim the Silicon Valley company benefited from illicit state aid after striking backroom deals with Ireland’s authorities, according to people involved in the case.</blockquote>

This simply isn’t so. And over and above the error concerning the content of the reports there is no possibility of a fine upon Apple whatsoever. For in cases of illegal state aid there never is a fine levied upon the company or recipient of such aid. The government that allowed or paid out the aid must recover it, that’s true, but there’s no fines over and above that even if there’s a finding of said illegal aid. Again, this just isn’t how the Commission undertakes its public policy on these matters. </blockquote>

Damn fact-based reporting.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple ec tax</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:140e9240111d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ec"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:tax"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.aclu.org/blog/technology-and-liberty/apple-throws-down-privacy-gauntlet">
    <title>Apple throws down privacy gauntlet &gt;&gt; American Civil Liberties Union</title>
    <dc:date>2014-09-19T16:49:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.aclu.org/blog/technology-and-liberty/apple-throws-down-privacy-gauntlet</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Chris Soghoian, principal technologist, on the privacy protection in iOS 8: <blockquote class="quoted">This was a big step for Apple, and one that likely required significant engineering work. What is so interesting and smart about this move is that rather than telling the government that they no longer want to help the government, they re-architected iOS so they are unable to help the government. Think of it as Apple playing a game of chicken, and the company has just thrown the steering wheel out of the window.

That's something that's going to be difficult for most tech companies to do, because so many of them have built their businesses around access to user data. If the companies can search and analyze that data, they can be forced to turn it over to the government. Apple's business model—selling expensive, luxury hardware to consumers—gives them the freedom to lock themselves out of access to their customers' data. Apple doesn't care what you store on your phone as long as you buy a new one every two years.

Although today's announcement is certainly big news, in many ways, it is far less significant than Apple's success in delivering end-to-end encrypted text, voice and video communications to the hundreds of millions of people using iMessage and FaceTime. To date, these apps have been advertised as free and easy ways for people to stay in touch with loved ones and family. However, the company could and should start advertising them as a much more secure alternative to regular telephone calls and text messages.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>privacy security apple google</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:fcae88b08654/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:security"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:google"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.watchesbysjx.com/2014/09/what-watch-industry-thinks-of-apple.html">
    <title>What the watch industry thinks of the Apple Watch &gt;&gt; WatchesbySJX</title>
    <dc:date>2014-09-11T17:05:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.watchesbysjx.com/2014/09/what-watch-industry-thinks-of-apple.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[In general, they don't think it's much of a threat. It's a "techno-toy". Might want to bookmark this one.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple awatch</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:5d056e0908c2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:awatch"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://qz.com/259433/the-people-camping-outside-the-apple-store-want-more-than-the-iphone-6/">
    <title>The people camping outside the Apple store want more than the iPhone 6 &gt;&gt; Quartz</title>
    <dc:date>2014-09-04T15:03:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://qz.com/259433/the-people-camping-outside-the-apple-store-want-more-than-the-iphone-6/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Zach Wener-Fligner: <blockquote class="quoted">Four people have already lined up to buy the next versions of the iPhone, which aren’t expected to go on sale for another 16 days. But they aren’t really there for iPhones: They are being paid by companies hoping to glom onto the expected frenzy.

Joseph Cruz and Brian Ceballo arrived in front of Apple’s glass cube on Fifth Avenue in Manhattan on Sunday, August 31. They brought tarps, chairs, sleeping bags, and lots of T-shirts for BuyBackWorld, an online electronics retailer. BuyBackWorld is picking up their food bill for the three-week urban campout. The company is also paying for the iPhone 6 of their choice, assuming that’s what Apple unveils at its event next week and begins selling, as expected, on Friday, Sept. 19.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple iphone queue</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:3be1767a285e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:queue"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2014/09/02Apple-Media-Advisory.html">
    <title>Update to celebrity photo investigation &gt;&gt; Apple</title>
    <dc:date>2014-09-03T05:44:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2014/09/02Apple-Media-Advisory.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="quoted">After more than 40 hours of investigation, we have discovered that certain celebrity accounts were compromised by a very targeted attack on user names, passwords and security questions, a practice that has become all too common on the Internet. None of the cases we have investigated has resulted from any breach in any of Apple’s systems including iCloud® or Find my iPhone. We are continuing to work with law enforcement to help identify the criminals involved. 

To protect against this type of attack, we advise all users to always use a strong password and enable two-step verification.</blockquote>

So the "iBrute" attack on Find my iPhone wasn't involved. In hacking cases, it's usually best to start with the least complex explanation - social engineering and password hacks - than complex attacks.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple hacking</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:535e116ee105/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:hacking"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.anandtech.com/show/8456/the-road-ahead">
    <title>The Road Ahead &gt;&gt; AnandTech</title>
    <dc:date>2014-09-01T07:12:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.anandtech.com/show/8456/the-road-ahead</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Anand Lai Shimpi, founder of the site: <blockquote class="quoted">after 17.5 years of digging, testing, analyzing and writing about the most interesting stuff in tech, it’s time for a change. This will be the last thing I write on AnandTech as I am officially retiring from the tech publishing world. Ryan Smith (@RyanSmithAT) is taking over as Editor in Chief of AnandTech. Ryan has been working with us for nearly 10 years, he has a strong background in Computer Science and he’s been shadowing me quite closely for the past couple of years. I am fully confident in Ryan’s ability to carry the torch and pick up where I left off. We’ve grown the staff over the course of this year in anticipation of the move. With a bunch of new faces around AnandTech, all eager to uphold the high standards and unique approach to covering tech, I firmly believe the site can continue to thrive for years to come.</blockquote>

He's <a href="http://recode.net/2014/08/31/veteran-tech-journalist-anand-shimpi-headed-to-apple/">going to Apple</a> to do an unspecified job.]]></description>
<dc:subject>anandtech apple</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:4ca8f0c12498/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:anandtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.latimes.com/local/education/la-me-deasy-ipads-20140826-story.html">
    <title>L.A. Unified halts contract for iPads &gt;&gt; LA Times</title>
    <dc:date>2014-08-26T17:11:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.latimes.com/local/education/la-me-deasy-ipads-20140826-story.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="quoted">LA schools Supt. John Deasy suspended future use of a contract with Apple on Monday that was to provide iPads to all students in the nation's second-largest school system amid mounting scrutiny of the $1-billion-plus effort.

The suspension comes days after disclosures that the superintendent and his top deputy had especially close ties to executives of Apple, maker of the iPad, and Pearson, the company that is providing the curriculum on the devices. And an internal report that examined the technology effort showed major problems with the process and the implementation.

"Moving forward, we will no longer utilize our current contract with Apple Inc.," Deasy wrote in a memo sent to the Board of Education on Monday.

"Not only will this decision enable us to take advantage of an ever-changing marketplace and technology advances, it will also give us time to take into account concerns raised surrounding the [project]," Deasy wrote.</blockquote>

(Thanks @pxr4t2 for the link.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>education technology apple ipad</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:85a3ec743b79/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ipad"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/apple_mark_gurman_9to5mac.php?nomobile=1">
    <title>Apple can't hide from a 20-year-old reporter &gt;&gt; Columbia Journalism Review</title>
    <dc:date>2014-08-21T16:54:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/apple_mark_gurman_9to5mac.php?nomobile=1</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Michael Rosenwald: <blockquote class="quoted">The best-sourced reporter covering Apple Inc., one of the world’s most secretive companies, is a 20-year-old junior at the University of Michigan. His name is Mark Gurman. He makes more than six figures a year as senior editor and scoop master at 9to5Mac.com, a news outlet most people have never heard of. In the interest of truth, which Gurman is known to pursue with almost religious zeal, it should be noted that he sometimes types stories in class.

Gurman’s scoops, beginning in high school, have included stories about Apple’s foray into tablets, new phone designs, the arrival of Siri, the dropping of Google maps, how Apple stores operate, how new operating systems work and look, and, most recently, how the company plans to integrate health and fitness tracking into its devices.</blockquote>

Aged 20? Reminiscent of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_Ciarelli">Nick Ciarelli</a>, who was at Harvard and ran the long-gone Think Secret, which was sued by Apple.]]></description>
<dc:subject>gurman apple</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:48b03a632a57/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:gurman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://nfb.org/blog/vonb-blog/comments-apple-and-nfb-resolution-2014-12">
    <title>Comments on Apple and NFB Resolution 2014-12 &gt;&gt; National Federation of the Blind</title>
    <dc:date>2014-07-12T08:17:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://nfb.org/blog/vonb-blog/comments-apple-and-nfb-resolution-2014-12</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Mark Riccobono, president of the US National Federation of the Blind: <blockquote class="quoted">I thought the chatter around the resolution would fade away until some media reports made inaccurate assertions about the resolution, its content, and what actions the NFB will take to carry it out. Many of these inaccurate assertions have been fueled by a provocative and poorly reported article from <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/07/09/us-apple-mobilephone-accessibility-idUSKBN0FE12Q20140709">the Reuters news service</a>, linked here only for reference. Reuters has already been forced to correct the article because it reported, inaccurately, that the National Federation of the Blind once brought suit against Apple, Inc. This never happened, although a demand letter was sent regarding the accessibility of iTunes and iTunes U, and the Massachusetts Attorney General opened an investigation. Those actions resulted in a voluntary agreement with Apple that was a significant step in getting us the accessibility we experience today.

Let me start by laying out some background for the resolution. In the wake of its commitment to making iTunes and iTunes U accessible to blind users, Apple has gone far beyond the scope of that original agreement and made the vast majority of its products accessible to the blind.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple accessibility</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:4384315e8e90/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:accessibility"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://online.wsj.com/articles/tim-cooks-apple-takes-shape-1404757939?mod=LS1">
    <title>Tim Cook's Apple takes shape &gt;&gt; WSJ</title>
    <dc:date>2014-07-08T20:51:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://online.wsj.com/articles/tim-cooks-apple-takes-shape-1404757939?mod=LS1</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="quoted">"Steve was a wartime CEO, while Tim is a peacetime CEO," said one former employee.

…Mr. Jobs's repudiations bruised feelings while making sure the company stayed focused on a few projects. Under Mr. Cook, current and former employees say Apple may be spreading itself too thin, pursuing too many ideas and compromising the "laser focus" that Mr. Jobs used to create the iMac, iPhone and iPad.

"It was Steve's job to say no," one of these people said. "Tim is not as comfortable doing that."

A person close to Apple said it is natural that a bigger Apple would broaden its portfolio. "I think Steve would have been saying yes to more things if he were still running the company," said this person, who noted that while Mr. Jobs was an intuitive decision maker, knowing what he liked and didn't like immediately, his snap decisions sometimes led to errors in judgment. Mr. Cook is more thoughtful and will take extra time to "minimize mistakes."

…The [$3.2bn Beats] deal raises the question of whether Mr. Jobs would have done the same.

Mr. Cook says he doesn't ask What Would Jobs Do. He says that Mr. Jobs told him before he died to never ask that question.

"I've abided by that. I think he did that because I think he wanted to relieve what might have been an enormous burden on me," said Mr. Cook in an interview at the time of the Beats deal. "Because of that, I've always been able to kind of block that question."</blockquote>

(Subscription required.) What this does capture is that Apple is becoming, internally, a gentler company - which, quite separately, is happening at Google too. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple cook culture</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:29bfce11919c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:cook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:culture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20140704005050/en/TrendForce-Global-Tablet-Shipments-Expected-Reach-205#.U7rT0I1dVbg">
    <title>TrendForce: global tablet shipments expected to reach 205m in 2014, up less than 5% year-on-year &gt;&gt; Business Wire</title>
    <dc:date>2014-07-07T20:25:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20140704005050/en/TrendForce-Global-Tablet-Shipments-Expected-Reach-205#.U7rT0I1dVbg</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[On the other hand... <blockquote class="quoted">WitsView Research Manager Eric Chiou noted, “Leading vendor Apple’s tablet shipments remained low in Q2 2014, estimated at only 13m. Although the company will release new models in H2 2014, the impact will be limited. Moreover, iPad might experience its first decline since entering the market in 2010, with volume expected to drop from 74.3m in 2013 to 68.4m in 2014, mainly because Apple is unlikely to hold any major promotional or sales events.”

Meanwhile, the second largest tablet vendor Samsung Electronics is endeavoring to meet tablet shipment quotas, but growth may not meet expectations, up only 14% year-on-year to 48m in 2014 because of poor performance in both entry- and high-end markets. The limited increase comes as the company’s Galaxy Tab Pro has seen fewer-than-expected sales due to high costs and because tablet products with similar specifications to the company’s Galaxy Tab Lite are being offered by many other tablet vendors.</blockquote>

Samsung has one problem, Apple has a very different one. (Thanks @Seoulite for the link.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>samsung apple tablets</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:ed5a1f25effe/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:tablets"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://rustyshelf.org/2014/07/01/io-thoughts/">
    <title>I/O thoughts &gt;&gt; Rusty Rants</title>
    <dc:date>2014-07-01T20:58:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://rustyshelf.org/2014/07/01/io-thoughts/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Russell Ivanovic develops for iOS and Android, and went to his first Google I/O: <blockquote class="quoted">Sundar [Pichai] has united all those divisions into one coherent functional team with one common vision. Talking to various Google Engineers at the event it was clear they all had the same sentiment.

In previous Google keynotes there were always things announced that you knew were going absolutely nowhere, but this year that changed. Android ‘L’ preview is an amazing OS, with great visual design that excites me about the future of that platform. Android Wear is a really good 1.0 implementation of what I personally want in a smart watch. Android TV looks like the platform I’ve been begging Apple to build for the last 3 years, and while I have to reserve judgement until it comes out later this year, I’m excited about it. Android Auto is something I want in my car right now, it’s just that good. Perhaps if you had to pick one thing that is a “that’s nice, but let’s wait and see” it would be their Android in the home implementation. Much like Apple’s HomeKit it all comes down to how many hardware vendors actually adopt it before it becomes useful.</blockquote>

(Thanks @undersinged for the link.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>android ios apple google</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:59c26a296134/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ios"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:google"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.apertureexpert.com/tips/2014/6/28/comment-follow-demise-aperture#.U7EwTY1dVbj">
    <title>Comment followup on the demise of Aperture &gt;&gt; ApertureExpert</title>
    <dc:date>2014-06-30T09:48:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.apertureexpert.com/tips/2014/6/28/comment-follow-demise-aperture#.U7EwTY1dVbj</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Joseph Linaschke runs the site: <blockquote class="quoted">Apple does care about photographers — even professional ones. They care deeply about them. I’m not saying this because I want to believe it, but because I know it. I got the call personally from Apple for two reasons yesterday — because I run this site, and because I’m a professional photographer. Lots of pro ‘tog friends got calls yesterday too. This decision didn’t come lightly, it isn’t personal, and no it wasn’t made because they hate you, dear reader. It’s a business decision and a technology decision and they are going to do everything possible to support the pros as much as feasible. Will Photos.app be the right solution for every pro out there? No, but neither was Aperture. Neither is Lightroom, or any other app you can name.

So why am I so sure that Apple does care about photographers? Look at how much of the keynote and sessions at WWDC (the recent Apple World Wide Developers Conference) was dedicated to photography.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>aperture apple</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:4fde5fcf6a75/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:aperture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ben-evans.com/benedictevans/2014/6/4/digesting-wwdc-cloudy">
    <title>Digesting WWDC: cloudy &gt;&gt; Benedict Evans</title>
    <dc:date>2014-06-05T20:32:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://ben-evans.com/benedictevans/2014/6/4/digesting-wwdc-cloudy</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>there’s a deeper and older dynamic starting to come into play now. Apple invented the smartphone as we know it 7 years ago and since then the concept has been built out. All the stuff that really should have been there has been added step by step by both Apple and Google, and the pace at which essential improvements are made is starting to flatten out. But as that happens, the two platforms start to converge. Copy & paste is copy & paste, but iBeacon is a very Apple sort of idea, just as Google Now is a very Google product. That is, as the core features are built out and commoditised, the changes are coming more and more in ways that reflect the very different characters of Apple and Google.</blockquote>

This difference in approach is pulling in entirely different directions, though.]]></description>
<dc:subject>android cloud apple google</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:1a684d6e9bcc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:cloud"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:google"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.beyonddevic.es/2014/06/05/what-winning-means-for-apple/">
    <title>What “winning” means for Apple &gt;&gt; Beyond Devices</title>
    <dc:date>2014-06-05T20:29:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.beyonddevic.es/2014/06/05/what-winning-means-for-apple/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Jan Dawson: <blockquote>To suggest that Apple is trying to “win” in the messaging wars is equivalent to suggesting that iTunes was an attempt to “win” in the music-playing software wars. Neither is the case. The first thing to understand about Apple is that it’s motivated first and foremost by creating the best possible experience on Apple devices. This imperative drove Steve Jobs to the extent that he made poor business decisions early on in his time at Apple, ultimately leading to his ouster. He was so fixated with this objective that he lost sight of others and ultimately of what it would take to keep Apple in business as a public company, a lesson he learned the hard way and ultimately brought back to Apple when he returned. But that has always been the fundamental motivation for Apple’s senior leaders above all else.</blockquote>

Also takes in the potential model for Amazon, if it does a smartphone. Educative.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple ecosystems</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:06267f2b4b02/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ecosystems"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.counterpointresearch.com/applebasebandbcom">
    <title>Apple should buy Broadcom’s cellular baseband business &gt;&gt; Counterpoint Technology</title>
    <dc:date>2014-06-05T00:59:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.counterpointresearch.com/applebasebandbcom</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Neil Shah: <blockquote>While R&D and integration would be tough initially, Apple has deep pockets to develop and integrate its own top-notch LTE capabilities into the products over the period of next two years. This could mean Apple will have to depend less on suppliers such as Qualcomm and can control its own roadmap by working closely with global carriers to shape its own product-cycles. Cellular IP is one weapon missing in Apple’s arsenal which it will like to acquire as mobile is the future and will power every other device.</blockquote>

Broadcom is looking to <a href="http://www.broadcom.com/press/release.php?id=s851659">sell or shut its cellular baseband business</a>. Apple already owns a chip design business, PA Semi, bought in 2006.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple broadcom baseband</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:924aed01ccaf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:broadcom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:baseband"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://duck.co/blog/safari">
    <title>DuckDuckGo in Safari on iOS and OSX &gt;&gt; DuckDuckGo</title>
    <dc:date>2014-06-04T03:28:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://duck.co/blog/safari</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Gabriel Weinberg: <blockquote>Yesterday at WWDC, <a href="http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2014/06/02Apple-Announces-OS-X-Yosemite.html"Apple announced</a> that DuckDuckGo will be included as a built-in search option in future versions of Safari on iOS and OS X. We are thrilled to be included in Safari and it's great that Apple is making it easy for people to access our anonymous search option. This makes DuckDuckGo the first privacy-focused search engine to be added to one of the top four browsers and is a huge milestone for both us and privacy supporters.</blockquote>

DDG is still tiny - but this is one way that it could become much bigger. It's living proof that you can serve ads simply based on search keywords, not personal tracking. Anyway, the <a href="http://www.wordstream.com/articles/most-expensive-keywords"most expensive Google ad keywords</a> - insurance, loans, mortgage, attorney and so on - really don't need your personal, trackable data to be served.]]></description>
<dc:subject>duckduckgo ios apple</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:978a079f21bd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:duckduckgo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ios"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press_Releases/2014/6/comScore_Reports_April_2014_US_Smartphone_Subscriber_Market_Share">
    <title>ComScore reports April 2014 US smartphone subscriber market share &gt;&gt; ComScore, Inc</title>
    <dc:date>2014-06-04T02:17:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press_Releases/2014/6/comScore_Reports_April_2014_US_Smartphone_Subscriber_Market_Share</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[(When it says "market share" it means installed base.) <blockquote>167.9m people in the U.S. owned smartphones (69.6% mobile market penetration) during the three months ending in April, up 5 percentage points since January. Apple ranked as the top OEM with 41.4% of US smartphone subscribers. Samsung ranked second with 27.7% market share (up 1 percentage point from January), followed by LG with 6.5%, Motorola with 6.3% and HTC with 5.3%.</blockquote>

Digging into the details shows that essentially nothing is changing, except that Samsung is tightening its grip on the Android market. There are 88.15m Android users (46.5m Samsung), up 5.5m since January; 69.5m iPhone users (up 3m since January), 4.2m BlackBerry users (down 0.75m since January), 5.5m Windows Phone users (up 0.4m since January) and 73.3m featurephone users - who are shifting to smartphones at a pretty constant rate of 1m per month.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple android us smartphone comscore</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:50944906247d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:comscore"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://onbitcoin.com/2014/06/02/apple-allows-bitcoin-apps-in-app-store/">
    <title>Apple to Allow bitcoin Apps in App Store &gt;&gt; On Bitcoin</title>
    <dc:date>2014-06-03T00:48:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://onbitcoin.com/2014/06/02/apple-allows-bitcoin-apps-in-app-store/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>According to the Developer Guidelines section 11.17:

Apps may facilitate transmission of approved virtual currencies provided that they do so in compliance with all state and federal laws for the territories in which the app functions

This means that developers can now build iOS apps for Bitcoin wallets. And Coinbase, Blockchain, and Fancy can all return their apps to the store.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>bitcoin apple</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:1574e71fd552/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:bitcoin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2014/06/where-apple-got-inspiration-for-7-of-its-big-wwdc-ideas/">
    <title>Where Apple 'got inspiration' for seven of its big WWDC ideas &gt;&gt; Gizmodo UK</title>
    <dc:date>2014-06-02T23:28:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2014/06/where-apple-got-inspiration-for-7-of-its-big-wwdc-ideas/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Spoiler: Dropbox, Swiftkey/TouchWiz (really?), Android, Snapchat, MightySMS on Android or Skype, OK Google, Windows Vista. Though Apple had cloud-based files and desktop syncing long before Dropbox - it introduced iTools in 2000.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple ios8</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:964beff7b04d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ios8"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://counternotions.com/2008/07/16/bet-iphone/">
    <title>From July 2008: iPhone: The bet Steve Jobs didn’t decline &gt;&gt; Counternotions</title>
    <dc:date>2014-06-02T01:30:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://counternotions.com/2008/07/16/bet-iphone/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[From July 2008, pointing out (among other risks for Apple of building a mobile phone) that <blockquote>If you fail, it would be a public fiasco of the first order, likely lopping off at least a third of your market cap and seriously eroding financial sector confidence in your company’s ability to grow and diversify beyond the Mac and the iPod businesses.</blockquote>

What's also interesting, looking back, is that "a huge and risky bet" is precisely how Apple staff have described the iPhone - both in personal recollections and in court cases (against Samsung).]]></description>
<dc:subject>business history iphone apple</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:533ce7a463d9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.theinformation.com/Why-Beats-is-a-Great-Buy-for-Apple">
    <title>Why Beats is a great buy for Apple &gt;&gt; The Information</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-28T21:57:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.theinformation.com/Why-Beats-is-a-Great-Buy-for-Apple</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Jessica Lessin: <blockquote>to really differentiate, Apple needs to get to more than parity in subscription music and likely knows that. The company could give away Spotify’s $9.99 a month streaming music service to 27 million customers for free for almost year with the $3 billion it is willing to pay for Beats. The only thing stopping the company from having a subscription service of its own was Mr. Jobs’s aversion to it, several former Apple employees say. He believed people should and would own music.

What else could could Apple do now? Well, it’s exactly the answer to that that Apple is paying for. With Mr. Iovine and Beats, Apple is boosting its odds that it can come up with that next killer music deal that no one else can, at least for a long enough period of exclusivity. Maybe that’s free music with a phone. Maybe it’s the rights to share music widely with friends. Most likely it is something few have thought of yet.

It’s worth noting that this deal is happening precisely as Apple is struggling to pull off the same sort of bold deal-making in television.</blockquote>

(Subscription required to read full article).]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple beats</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:35aaf1d86a3d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:beats"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.apple.com/pr/library/2014/05/28Apple-to-Acquire-Beats-Music-Beats-Electronics.html">
    <title>Apple to acquire Beats Music &amp; Beats Electronics &gt;&gt; Apple PR</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-28T21:22:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.apple.com/pr/library/2014/05/28Apple-to-Acquire-Beats-Music-Beats-Electronics.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Apple® today announced it has agreed to acquire the critically acclaimed subscription streaming music service Beats Music, and Beats Electronics, which makes the popular Beats headphones, speakers and audio software. As part of the acquisition, Beats co-founders Jimmy Iovine and Dr. Dre will join Apple. Apple is acquiring the two companies for a total of $3 billion, consisting of a purchase price of approximately $2.6bn and approximately $400m that will vest over time.</blockquote>

So does Beats Music become the implementation of iTunes for Android?]]></description>
<dc:subject>beats apple</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:f2c8b95311d1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:beats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.asymco.com/2014/05/28/questions-for-eddy-cue-and-craig-federighi/">
    <title>Questions for Eddy Cue and Craig Federighi &gt;&gt; Asymco</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-28T10:28:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.asymco.com/2014/05/28/questions-for-eddy-cue-and-craig-federighi/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Cue and Federighi are appearing at the Re/Code conference this week, and Horace Dediu has some questions. Such as: <blockquote>Why is there no app store for Apple TV? Even though the product is running essentially the same hardware and software as the iPhone and iPad and iPod touch and even though it connects to the iTunes stores, there is no option for developers to build apps for it or for consumers to use their TVs to run iOS apps. I might add that it’s been seven years since the platform launched and that’s a long time to wait.</blockquote>

and

<blockquote>YouTube is becoming the TV of choice for millions. Before it becomes that choice for billions, what are you doing to encourage user-generated video content distribution through your ecosystem?</blockquote>

Let's hope these get asked, and answered.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple itunes</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:cebbadd037aa/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:itunes"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1bef71b8-e433-11e3-a73a-00144feabdc0.html?siteedition=uk#axzz32r6UZ6gg">
    <title>Apple readying new software platform for the ‘Smart Home’ &gt;&gt; FT.com</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-26T20:31:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1bef71b8-e433-11e3-a73a-00144feabdc0.html?siteedition=uk#axzz32r6UZ6gg</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Tim Bradshaw: <blockquote>Apple is readying a new software platform that would turn the iPhone into a remote control for lights, security systems and other household appliances, as part of a move into the “internet of things”.

…The scheme will be similar to Apple’s existing “Made for iPhone” label, given to compatible headphones, speakers and other accessories, but with a new brand and logo. Apple may also provide additional checks and assurances that certified products are not vulnerable to hackers.

The Cupertino-based company was likely to emphasise the privacy protections built into its smart home system, one person familiar with Apple’s plans told the FT, given heightened sensitivity about technology companies’ access to personal information amid revelations about US intelligence agencies’ online surveillance programmes.
 
Apple considers privacy a key advantage over Google, the person said, since Google relies on targeted advertising as its main source of income.</blockquote>

If that's right, it makes Google's December SEC filing - where it talked about getting adverts everywhere - look like a sort of advert for Apple's approach.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple smarthome iphone wwdc</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:12e075d490d9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smarthome"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:wwdc"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.macrumors.com/2014/05/25/apple-software-update-invalid/">
    <title>Apple forgets to renew SSL certificate, breaking OS X software update [fixed] &gt;&gt; Mac Rumors</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-26T20:21:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.macrumors.com/2014/05/25/apple-software-update-invalid/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Swscan.apple.com is one of several servers that Software Update uses to communicate with Apple. The apparent problem is that the security certificate for the server appears to have expired. The certificate was originally valid from May 22, 2012 to May 24, 2014. </blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>ssl apple</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:ce99f841b025/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ssl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2014/05/20/apple-samsung-settlement-talks-bogus/">
    <title>Reports of Apple-Samsung settlement talks were bogus &gt;&gt; Fortune Tech</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-24T17:32:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2014/05/20/apple-samsung-settlement-talks-bogus/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>On Tuesday, the <em>Korea Times</em> took it all back. Samsung was agreeable to settlement talks, it <a href="http://m.koreatimes.co.kr/phone/news/view.jsp?req_newsidx=157532">reported</a>, but not Apple. "Apple resists settlement with Samsung" was the headline on an early version of the story. 

The final version went further: "Apple rejects deal with Samsung."

Only trouble is, there never was a deal.

Nor were there any settlement talks, as the two companies' <a href="http://fortunebrainstormtech.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/1894-joint-adr-submission.pdf">joint submission</a> to U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh court makes clear.</blockquote>

They couldn't even agree on the preconditions to begin talks (called ADR, or "alternative dispute resolution" - alternative to court cases, that is.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple samsung legal</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:3ade906f8d8b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:legal"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.counterpointresearch.com/q12014marketmonitorvalue">
    <title>Smartphones now 95% of total handset revenues &gt;&gt; Counterpoint Technology Market Research</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-22T22:22:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.counterpointresearch.com/q12014marketmonitorvalue</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Neil Shah with some more nuggets: <blockquote>• Smartphone revenues now accounts to 95% of the total handset shipment revenues globally, highest ever. Feature phones are moving towards oblivion (pretty quickly).

• Apple captured more than a third of those revenues with Samsung closely behind Apple with revenue share, together capturing more than two-third of global smartphone revenues as well
If we leave out Samsung, Apple generates more revenues than all the global smartphone brands combined

• Xiaomi is now the fifth largest smartphone brand in terms of revenues overtaking likes of Nokia, Lenovo, Motorola, Coolpad and Huawei and on track to challenge LG & Sony for the third spot confirming its volume market share gains during the quarter, thanks to its smartphone models entering the global best-sellers list during the quarter</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>smartphone xiaomi apple samsung</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:20cf4a38d58b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:xiaomi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.counterpointresearch.com/q12014marketmonitor">
    <title>Market monitor Q1 2014: handset &amp; smartphone markets landscape &gt;&gt; Counterpoint Technology Market Research</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-21T19:54:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.counterpointresearch.com/q12014marketmonitor</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Neil Shah: <blockquote>the biggest surprise was Chinese smartphone maker Xiaomi which almost quadrupled its volumes with rising demand for its expanding portfolio & reach extending beyond the domestic market. This has allowed Xiaomi to enter the top 10 global handset brand during the quarter for first time ever capturing 4% marketshare

The long tail of Asian OEMs continued to grow moderately and below the industry average as they are high on consolidation curve with fight for survival in the fierce sub-$100 segment.</blockquote>

There's also a report on <a href="http://www.counterpointresearch.com/q12014marketmonitorusa">US phone sales</a>.]]></description>
<dc:subject>smartphone apple samsung</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:662fd389c4b3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/05/17/us-apple-google-settlement-idUSBREA4F0S020140517">
    <title>Apple, Google settle smartphone patent litigation | Reuters</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-18T21:13:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/05/17/us-apple-google-settlement-idUSBREA4F0S020140517</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote> Apple Inc and Google Inc's Motorola Mobility unit have agreed to settle all patent litigation between them over smartphones, ending one of the highest-profile lawsuits in technology.

In a joint statement on Friday, the companies said the settlement does not include a cross license to their respective patents.

"Apple and Google have also agreed to work together in some areas of patent reform," the statement said.
 
Apple and companies that make phones using Google's Android software have filed dozens of such lawsuits against one another around the world to protect their technology. Apple co-founder Steve Jobs called Android a "stolen product."

Google and Apple informed a federal appeals court in Washington that their cases against each other should be dismissed, according to filings on Friday. However, the deal does not apply to Apple's litigation against Samsung Electronics Co Ltd.</blockquote>

This is quite odd. Motorola had been suing Apple since 2010, claiming that Apple infringed its standard-essential patents on 3G. Apple said it had a licence via its chip supplier. Back and forth, and no result. But now with the Lenovo deal about to get approved, this never-ending litigation is abruptly settled. It feels like Motorola - or Google, or Lenovo - wanted things wrapped up. Florian Müller <a herf="http://www.fosspatents.com/2014/05/apple-google-dismiss-patent-suits.html">calls it</a> a "second-class settlement".]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple motorola google patents standards</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:4ab737d6ec5d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:motorola"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://9to5mac.com/2014/05/14/likely-iphone-6-with-sharper-larger-1704-x-960-resolution-screen-in-testing/">
    <title>iPhone 6 with larger, sharper 1704 x 960 resolution screen in testing &gt;&gt; 9to5Mac</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-14T13:56:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://9to5mac.com/2014/05/14/likely-iphone-6-with-sharper-larger-1704-x-960-resolution-screen-in-testing/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Mark Gurman: <blockquote>Apple is preparing to make another significant screen adjustment to the iPhone. Instead of retaining the current resolution, sources familiar with the testing of at least one next-generation iPhone model say that Apple plans to scale the next iPhone display with a pixel-tripling (3X) mode.

This means that Apple will likely be tripling the aforementioned “base resolution” (568 x 320) of the iPhone screen in both directions, and that the iPhone screen resolution will be scaled with an increase of 150% from the current 2X resolution of 1136 x 640. Of course, <a href="http://9to5mac.com/2012/05/22/likely-next-generation-iphone-with-3-9-inch-display-1136-x-640-resolution-in-testing/">Apple tests several different iPhones and display technologies</a>, so it is possible that Apple chooses to take another route for display specifications for the 2014 iPhone upgrade.</blockquote>

A 4.7in phone with that resolution would be 416ppi; a 5.5in phone would be 356ppi. Bet Apple would rather sell a ton of 5.5in iPhones than 7in iPad minis.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple iphone screen</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:2b213557eb10/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:screen"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://9to5mac.com/2014/05/13/apple-plans-to-match-microsoft-surface-with-split-screen-ipad-multitasking-in-ios-8/">
    <title>Apple plans to match Microsoft Surface with split-screen iPad multitasking in iOS 8 &gt;&gt; 9to5Mac</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-13T13:54:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://9to5mac.com/2014/05/13/apple-plans-to-match-microsoft-surface-with-split-screen-ipad-multitasking-in-ios-8/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>In addition to allowing for two iPad apps to be used at the same time, the feature is designed to allow for apps to more easily interact, according to the sources. For example, a user may be able to drag content, such as text, video, or images, from one app to another. Apple is said to be developing capabilities for developers to be able to design their apps to interact with each other. This functionality may mean that Apple is finally ready to enable “XPC” support in iOS, which means that developers could design App Store apps that could share content.</blockquote>

File under "rumour". Split screens might not be essential, but inter-app communications feels like a huge gap in getting the iPad to really take over computing functions.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple ios8</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:2d0a69bab662/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ios8"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.edisonresearch.com/home/archives/2014/05/why-radio-and-music-should-take-the-itunesbeats-deal-seriously.php">
    <title>Why radio and music should take the iTunes/Beats deal seriously &gt;&gt; Edison Research</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-12T21:27:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.edisonresearch.com/home/archives/2014/05/why-radio-and-music-should-take-the-itunesbeats-deal-seriously.php</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Edison Research’s “The Infinite Dial 2014,” released when iTunes Radio was four months old and fielded as Beats Music debuted, had signs of encouragement for both. Awareness of Beats was already 9%. Meanwhile, iTunes Radio had been listened to by 8% of respondents in the previous month, making it third to Pandora and almost tied with iHeartRadio (9%).

The rumoured deal in which Apple will buy Beats for $3.2bn has been characterised in one report already as a sign of Apple’s desperation to stay relevant in a streaming world. Some broadcasters will try to minimise the story by positioning it as  the combination of two underwhelming entities. And some don’t see  this as a streaming music play at all.

Whatever Apple’s intent, there are still significant implications here for broadcasters and labels. Besides giving Apple a subscription streaming music operation without building one from scratch, Beats Music and iTunes Radio very nicely fill in each other’s vulnerabilities, not just by putting iTunes on Android, but from a radio/audio programming standpoint.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>radio music beats itunes apple</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:4659d4cb4347/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:radio"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:music"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:beats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:itunes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/apple-plans-release-iphone-6-august-report-article-1.1786430">
    <title>Apple plans to roll out iPhone 6 in August, a month earlier than expected: report &gt;&gt; NY Daily News</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-12T16:57:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/apple-plans-release-iphone-6-august-report-article-1.1786430</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Apple plans to release its new iPhone in August, a month earlier than expected, after sales were hit by new big-screen models from its rivals, a major Taiwanese newspaper reported Friday, citing supply chain sources.

The Economic Daily News quoted unnamed sources as saying Apple had acquired parts from various Taiwanese suppliers such as wafer maker Visual Photonics Epitaxy Co and Largan Precision, a leading maker of lenses used in mobile phones, for the handset expected to be called iPhone 6.

Taiwanese electronics contract makers including Foxconn and Pegatron have also been notified by Apple to start their assembly lines for the new handsets likely around late June, said the mass-circulation national newspaper.</blockquote>

Believe it if you choose to. Let's circle back (as they say) in August.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple iphone6</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:98f83c0983d1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone6"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/06/apple-beats_n_2815676.html">
    <title>March 2013: Apple meets with Beats about music-streaming service &gt;&gt; Reuters</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-11T20:59:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/06/apple-beats_n_2815676.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Just over a year ago...<blockquote>Apple has held talks with Beats Electronics LLC, the audio technology firm co-founded by influential hip-hop producer Dr Dre and music mogul Jimmy Iovine, on a potential partnership involving Beats' planned music-streaming service, three people familiar with the situation told Reuters.</blockquote>

From one meeting...]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple beats</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:0d80b3f1c599/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:beats"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.vanityfair.com/business/2014/06/apple-samsung-smartphone-patent-war">
    <title>The Great Smartphone War: Apple vs. Samsung &gt;&gt; Vanity Fair</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-07T18:28:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.vanityfair.com/business/2014/06/apple-samsung-smartphone-patent-war</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Kurt Eichenwald: <blockquote>According to various court records and people who have worked with Samsung, ignoring competitors’ patents is not uncommon for the Korean company. And once it’s caught it launches into the same sort of tactics used in the Apple case: countersue, delay, lose, delay, appeal, and then, when defeat is approaching, settle. “They never met a patent they didn’t think they might like to use, no matter who it belongs to,” says Sam Baxter, a patent lawyer who once handled a case for Samsung. “I represented [the Swedish telecommunications company] Ericsson, and they couldn’t lie if their lives depended on it, and I represented Samsung and they couldn’t tell the truth if their lives depended on it.”</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>samsung apple patents</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:d53324572747/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.electronista.com/articles/14/04/14/might.theoretically.be.justified.by.larger.screen.size/">
    <title>Apple considering hiking price of iPhone 6 by $100, says analyst &gt;&gt; Electronista</title>
    <dc:date>2014-04-14T21:55:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.electronista.com/articles/14/04/14/might.theoretically.be.justified.by.larger.screen.size/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Apple has been asking carriers for approval to raise the base subsidized price of the iPhone 6 from $199 to $299, claims Jefferies analyst Peter Misek. The carriers have allegedly balked at the idea so far. Apple could potentially justify the increase due to the phone's bigger size; it's unclear in fact if the hike would apply to the 4.7-inch model or the 5.5-inch one, since Misek refers to just one iPhone 6. Many shoppers would likely assume a 5.5-inch phone would be more expensive.</blockquote>

Misek has a <a href="http://www.cultofmac.com/215736/a-history-of-horrible-apple-predictions-from-peter-misek/">woeful record</a> on Apple predictions. Watching brief on this one.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple iphone phablet</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:1aa56d0d79ac/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:phablet"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://9to5mac.com/2014/04/09/jony-ive-shakes-up-apples-software-design-group-iphone-interface-creator-greg-christie-departing/">
    <title>Jony Ive shakes up Apple’s software design group, iPhone interface creator Greg Christie departing &gt;&gt; 9to5Mac</title>
    <dc:date>2014-04-09T21:20:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://9to5mac.com/2014/04/09/jony-ive-shakes-up-apples-software-design-group-iphone-interface-creator-greg-christie-departing/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The design shakeup at Apple will result in Christie soon leaving the company, with all software designers now working directly under Ive with the rest of his industrial design team instead of within Federighi’s engineering group. Sources say that Christie’s upcoming departure is significant and stems from a falling out with Ive.<p>

When Ive tasked Apple’s Human Interface team with redesigning iOS 7 to include an entirely new look, Christie and Ive reportedly clashed over design direction, after which Ive is said to have circumvented Christie’s leadership of the team during the new operating system’s development.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple ive christie higgs</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:535f433f9991/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ive"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:christie"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:higgs"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.imore.com/there-wont-be-another-iphone-not-apple-not-anyone-not-long-time-yet">
    <title>There won't be another iPhone-class product, not for Apple, not for anyone, not for a long time &gt;&gt; iMore</title>
    <dc:date>2014-04-09T15:15:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.imore.com/there-wont-be-another-iphone-not-apple-not-anyone-not-long-time-yet</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Rene Ritchie: <blockquote>We've all seen the reports. The iPhone by itself is more profitable than many of Apple's competitors are in total. iPhone is as profitable as companies with oligopoly control over fossil fuel resources. It's a singular phenomenon.<p>

The iPad doesn't make as much money as the iPhone. And, no iWatch, iTelevision, iEspresso maker, or any other consumer electronics product is going to either.<p>

Yet article after article, analyst after analyst insists Apple simply must release their "next big thing" and now or, doomed. 60 days to release an iWatch or doomed. Has to sell 65m units a year or doomed. Haunted. Doomed.</blockquote>

Sensible. The smartphone has been the fastest-adopted technology ever* (data for the wheel not available).]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple iphone iwatch</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:243a81483b58/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iwatch"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/04/04/microsoft-office-for-the-ipad-its-delightfully-familiar/?_php=true&amp;_type=blogs&amp;action=click&amp;contentCollection=Technology&amp;region=Footer&amp;module=Recommendation&amp;src=recg&amp;pgtype=Blogs&amp;_r=0">
    <title>Microsoft Office for the iPad: it's delightfully familiar &gt;&gt; NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2014-04-07T15:52:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/04/04/microsoft-office-for-the-ipad-its-delightfully-familiar/?_php=true&amp;_type=blogs&amp;action=click&amp;contentCollection=Technology&amp;region=Footer&amp;module=Recommendation&amp;src=recg&amp;pgtype=Blogs&amp;_r=0</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Farhad Manjoo: <blockquote>the most startling thing about using Office on an iPad is how comfortable it feels. Sure, the tablet version, which has to accommodate touch input, not a mouse pointer, looks different from the desktop version. The stripped-down interface has fewer advanced features than on your desktop, and the menus are blessedly minimalist, showing only the main options you’d need for any given task.<p>

Yet despite the new look, everything about the software is obvious. For the most part, the iPad versions of Word, Excel, PowerPoint and OneNote work exactly as they do on PCs and Macs.<p>

This is a testament to the designers and engineers at Microsoft and to the power of long-term training. Other than my web browser, there’s no software I use more often than Word, so I’ve internalized all its tics. I know the keyboard shortcuts, the menu options, the ins and outs of esoteric features like Track Changes. As I used the iPad version, I felt it click into the same neural grooves dug out by the years I’ve spent on desktop Office. If you’re familiar with Office, you won’t face any learning curve in the new version.<p>

If you love Office on your computer, you’ll love it on your iPad. If you’ve always hated it, that won’t change, either; now you’ll just have one more place to hate it.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>office ipad microsoft apple</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:ba853b2b72e1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ipad"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/03/30/meet-lucy-h-koh-a-silicon-valley-judge/?_php=true&amp;_type=blogs&amp;_php=true&amp;_type=blogs&amp;partner=yahoofinance&amp;_r=1">
    <title>Meet Lucy H. Koh, a Silicon Valley Judge &gt;&gt; NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2014-03-31T11:44:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/03/30/meet-lucy-h-koh-a-silicon-valley-judge/?_php=true&amp;_type=blogs&amp;_php=true&amp;_type=blogs&amp;partner=yahoofinance&amp;_r=1</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Engaging profile: <blockquote>Judge Koh has a reputation for keeping strict control of her courtroom. In the first Apple-Samsung patent trial, when Apple bid to block testimony from a Samsung witness, she said: ”I don’t trust what any lawyer tells me in this courtroom. I want to see actual papers.”</blockquote>

Like it.]]></description>
<dc:subject>koh apple samsung</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:7e87c5a72703/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:koh"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?id=20140323000031&amp;cid=1206">
    <title>Xiaomi tops the list of most-complained about mobile phone &gt;&gt; WantChinaTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2014-03-24T18:27:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?id=20140323000031&amp;cid=1206</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Chinese smartphone manufacturer Xiaomi has received the highest number of complaints from consumers in China among any mobile phone brands, with 993 such instances being reported, followed by Apple at 805 and Samsung with 621 complaints, reports the state-run China News Service, citing a report published by a Chinese product control foundation.<p>

The foundation stated that it had received 6,497 mobile phone-related complaints in 2013, a 60% growth from the previous year, and which accounted for 12.4% of the total number of complaints received by the industry.<p>

The report revealed the top 10 mobile phone brands that received the most number of complaints, which included Xiaomi, Meizu, Huawei, ZTE, HTC, Nokia, Lenovo and Motorola.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>china xiaomi samsung apple</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:207f925d9b7f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:xiaomi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.welivesecurity.com/2014/03/21/10-years-of-mac-os-x-malware/">
    <title>10 years of Mac OS X malware &gt;&gt; We Live Security</title>
    <dc:date>2014-03-21T23:51:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.welivesecurity.com/2014/03/21/10-years-of-mac-os-x-malware/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Graham Cluley: <blockquote>Before we begin, let’s make one thing really clear.<p>

The malware problem on Mac OS X is nothing like as bad as it is on Windows.<p>

There are something like 200,000 new Windows malware variants being discovered each day. Malicious code activity in the Mac world is far less frenetic, but the fact is, malware does exist that can infect our iMacs or MacBooks.<p>

And if your Apple computer is unlucky enough to fall victim you’re not going to feel any better than your PC-owning friends who are struggling to remove a backdoor Trojan or a pernicious browser toolbar from their copy of Windows.</blockquote>

He lists 14 main ones. Wonder what a comparable one for Windows over the same period would look like.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple malware</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:cd2ceab495d4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:malware"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://qz.com/190600/why-apple-cant-match-googles-nosy-new-smartwatches/">
    <title>Why Apple can’t match Google’s all-seeing new smartwatches &gt;&gt; Quartz</title>
    <dc:date>2014-03-21T17:21:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://qz.com/190600/why-apple-cant-match-googles-nosy-new-smartwatches/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Christopher Mims: <blockquote>Apple has so far shown almost no desire to mine this data as Google does. What’s more, the ubiquity of Google’s services means many people aren’t even using Apple’s default apps anymore, and are instead going straight to Google’s apps and web services—like the (excellent) Gmail app for iOS, which many prefer to accessing Gmail through Apple’s native email app.<p>

Aside from the fact that many of Apple’s services lack a web-based component that makes them accessible on any device, it’s not clear Apple even has the expertise to crunch all this data in the way that Google Now does—or to use that data to predict our needs. Apple had a chance to create something like Google Now in 2010 when it acquired the voice-powered personal assistant Siri, which has its origins in research conduted for the US military. One of the intentions of early versions of Siri was “context awareness,” precisely the thing at which Google Now excels.<p>

Even if Siri were revamped now, however, it’s not clear whether Apple knows enough about its users to provide them a Google Now-like experience.</blockquote>

ComScore data suggests that actually, most Apple users stick with defaults - that the Gmail app is used by less than 45% of the combined user base of Android + iOS in the US. That aside, it's clear Apple won't have a "Google Now" any time soon, if ever. So where will the "smart" be - if anywhere?]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple android smartwatch</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:96766aec1709/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:smartwatch"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://9to5mac.com/2014/03/17/this-is-healthbook-apples-first-major-step-into-health-fitness-tracking/">
    <title>This is Healthbook, Apple’s major first step into health &amp; fitness tracking &gt;&gt; 9to5Mac</title>
    <dc:date>2014-03-19T17:44:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://9to5mac.com/2014/03/17/this-is-healthbook-apples-first-major-step-into-health-fitness-tracking/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Mark Gurman: <blockquote>Healthbook’s user interface is largely inspired by the iPhone’s existing Passbook application. Versions of Healthbook in testing are capable of tracking several different health and fitness data points.<p>

Each category of functionality is a card in the Healthbook. Cards are distinguished by a colour, and the tabs can be arranged to fit user preferences. As can be seen in the above images, Healthbook has sections that can track data pertaining to bloodwork, heart rate, hydration, blood pressure, physical activity, nutrition, blood sugar, sleep, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and weight.</blockquote>

Hard to see that this would be the full usefulness of a wearable Apple thingamajig, because those are directly useful for comparatively few people.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple healthbook</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:783699925c62/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:healthbook"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/516fad4c-a91b-11e3-bf0c-00144feab7de.html?siteedition=uk#axzz2wIfDdIhO">
    <title>Startups with an Apple flavour &gt;&gt; FT.com</title>
    <dc:date>2014-03-18T08:36:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/516fad4c-a91b-11e3-bf0c-00144feab7de.html?siteedition=uk#axzz2wIfDdIhO</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Tim Bradshaw looks at what ex-Apple staff are doing in Silicon Valley: <blockquote>[Mike] Matas says working at Facebook can be very different from Apple. Now it is a question of working with users who generate their own content, he says: “You have to design for other people’s stuff.” While Apple’s teams were silo­ed and rarely met their counterparts in other departments, Facebook is much more collaborative. “A lot of stuff that Paper has developed has gone out into other parts of the company,” he says.<p>
Nonetheless, Paper was developed in secrecy for more than a year before its surprise unveiling in January. That seems more like Apple’s ap­proach than the internet companies’. Facebook and Google often post new services to the web to see how users res­pond, before improving them based on large-scale, real-world behaviour.<p>
Mr Grignon says Facebook’s sometime motto of “move fast and break things” sits uncomfortably with many longstanding Apple employees. “It’s a recklessness, in a way, of engineering. It works well for folks like Facebook but Apple engineers go­ing into companies like that can experience a certain level of frustration.”</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple facebook startup culture</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:d23e248985da/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:startup"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:culture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://time.com/jonathan-ive-apple-interview/">
    <title>Apple designer Jonathan Ive talks about Steve Jobs and new products &gt;&gt; TIME</title>
    <dc:date>2014-03-17T14:52:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://time.com/jonathan-ive-apple-interview/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Spoiler alert: he doesn't actually talk about new products. Time reprinted John Arlidge's interview, which includes this nugget: <blockquote>It was his teenage love of cars that made Ive decide to become a designer. When he left school, he checked out a few car-design courses in London, including one at the Royal College. He swiftly changed his mind. “The classes were full of students making vroom! vroom! noises as they drew,” he recalls, still horrified. So he headed to Newcastle Polytechnic to study industrial design. His work there — notably a telephone and a hearing aid — was so good it was exhibited at the Design Museum in London.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>ive interview design apple</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:99875a18dd66/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ive"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:interview"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.citeworld.com/security/23099/samsung-knox-2-iOS-7-enterprise-security?page=0">
    <title>Samsung KNOX 2.0 vs. iOS 7 security: an overview &gt;&gt; CITEworld</title>
    <dc:date>2014-03-12T17:26:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.citeworld.com/security/23099/samsung-knox-2-iOS-7-enterprise-security?page=0</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Ryan Fass: <blockquote>The following are 14 enterprise, IT, or security-focused features and capabilities touted by Samsung or Apple along with how each platform delivers them (or doesn't). This is meant to provide a broad overview of what each platform offers, and is not the result of exhaustive testing. Where both platforms offer a similar but not identical feature, this article does not attempt to judge which approach is better.</blockquote>

Absent BlackBerry, these are the only two in the race for secure BYOD.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple samsung byod</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:5b941255b398/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:byod"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://9to5mac.com/2014/03/11/ios-8-apple-polishes-maps-data-adds-public-transit-directions-service/">
    <title>iOS 8: Apple polishes Maps data, adds public transit directions service &gt;&gt; 9to5Mac</title>
    <dc:date>2014-03-11T16:24:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://9to5mac.com/2014/03/11/ios-8-apple-polishes-maps-data-adds-public-transit-directions-service/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Thanks to extensive engineering work and acquisitions of several companies such BroadMap, Embark, and HopStop, Apple’s database for iOS Maps will be upgraded with enhanced data so it is more reliable, according to sources. The new application will also be injected with new points of interests and new labels to make places such as airports, parks, train stations, bus stops, highways, and freeways easier to find, the sources added. Sources also say that the mapping application’s cartography design has been tweaked to be slightly cleaner and to make streets more visible.<p>

In addition to the mapping data changes, Apple will add one of the most important mobile features to Maps this year: public transit directions.</blockquote>

Overdue.

<blockquote>Apple is also working on unique ways for integrating indoor mapping views and enhanced car integration for future versions of iOS. Sources say that Apple has also begun work on augmented reality functionality that leverages the iPhone’s compass hardware to visually see nearby points of interest.</blockquote>

Apps such as Localscope already do this - but its usefulness is limited.]]></description>
<dc:subject>ios apple maps</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:92a8b7f958af/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ios"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:maps"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://chitika.com/insights/2014/ios-706-by-device">
    <title>UPDATE: iOS 7.0.6 adoption climbs to 25.9% in North America &gt;&gt; Chitika</title>
    <dc:date>2014-02-27T16:30:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://chitika.com/insights/2014/ios-706-by-device</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>To provide an even more current view of the progress of iOS 7.0.6, Chitika Insights examined overall iOS version distribution as of Tuesday, February 25. The graph below shows iOS 7.0.6 users generating close to 26% of total iOS-based North American Web traffic. This represents a near 13 percentage point increase in share since our previous study period two days prior.</blockquote>

Still leaves about half of devices on susceptible versions, though Chitika suggests they might be updated within a week given current progress.]]></description>
<dc:subject>chitika ssl apple 706</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:abcdbd122f99/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:chitika"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ssl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:706"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://spylockout.org/">
    <title>Spy Lockout &gt;&gt; EFF and others</title>
    <dc:date>2014-02-26T22:39:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://spylockout.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Apple has approved the following proposal for discussion at its 28 February 2014 shareholder meeting in Cupertino. Spy Lockout was developed by Apple shareholders, developers, users, and employees, with advice from Electronic Frontier Foundation attorney Kurt Opsahl, encryption expert Bruce Schneier, Lavabit attorney Ian Samuel, and EFF founder John Gilmore…<p>Apple should, to the full extent permissible by law, deploy its strengths in both technology and law to publicly reveal, challenge, reduce, and overturn every government attempt at covert surveillance against its customers that doesn't meet these standards: surveillance of single, identified individuals under a warrant issued by a neutral judge, particularly describing the person and places to be searched, and of limited duration. To the full extent permissible by law, Apple should not actively or passively agree to do or allow covert mass surveillance against its customers, nor remain silent about what Apple and the government have done or are doing.</blockquote>

Note the phrase "to the full extent permitted by the law". That isn't very far.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>spylockout apple</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:1e903b7161d6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:spylockout"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://techland.time.com/2014/02/21/ios-vs-android-2/">
    <title>The smartphone app wars are over, and Apple won &gt;&gt; TIME.com</title>
    <dc:date>2014-02-23T22:04:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://techland.time.com/2014/02/21/ios-vs-android-2/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Harry McCracken being uncontroversial, points to the order in which new apps tend to appear in the west: iPhone, Android phones, iPads. (Sometimes the last two are reversed.) <blockquote>The current situation seems to me to be a largely happy one for both iOS and Android users. They’re two great platforms, each with some unique strengths and access to vast quantities of apps. But it’s not the scenario long predicted by the market share ūber alles crowd. And there aren’t even any isolated incidents that should set off little alarms in Apple’s head — a hot app or a big company announcing that it’s decided to go Android-first.<p>

So it isn’t rash to declare that we’ve reached the point where the reasonable conclusion is that market share alone is not the overriding factor.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>android ios apple apps</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:7061bac11553/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ios"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apps"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7281378">
    <title>What's the origin of Apple's SSL/TLS bug? &gt;&gt; Hacker News</title>
    <dc:date>2014-02-22T20:19:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7281378</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Discussion on Hacker News of Apple's SSL/TLS bug (if you have an iOS device, update it) and how it might have occured. It's either a very spooky piece of sabotage, or a bad commit. See the diff on line 631 of <a href="https://gist.github.com/alexyakoubian/9151610/revisions">https://gist.github.com/alexyakoubian/9151610/revisions</a>. Surprisingly, neither the GCC or Clang compiler will throw a warning.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple security hacking</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:d9fc1a6098e0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:security"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:hacking"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-said-demanding-iphone-logos-covered-at-olympics-opening-ceremony-05315780/">
    <title>Samsung said demanding iPhone logos covered at Olympics opening ceremony &gt;&gt; SlashGear</title>
    <dc:date>2014-02-05T21:47:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.slashgear.com/samsung-said-demanding-iphone-logos-covered-at-olympics-opening-ceremony-05315780/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Olympics sponsor Samsung is reportedly dropping Galaxy Note 3 smartphones in athletes' goodie-bags, though the gift comes with a catch: a supposed ban on any other device branding, iPhone or otherwise, during the opening ceremony. Details of the clamp-down, which is said to require the Apple logo on an iPhone be physically covered so that it's not caught on camera during the televised ceremony in Sochi, were spilled by the Swiss Olympic team.<p>

They were pleased to discover the Note 3 in among the other promotional kit sponsors have been offering, Bluewin reports, but the phone came with guidelines on what Samsung is said to be requiring in return for its financial support. The rule only appears to apply to athletes, rather than anybody else attending the opening ceremony.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple samsung olympics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:685d05dcbf1f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:olympics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23744">
    <title>November 2008: Apple iPhone doomed to failure - Windows Mobile 7 plans for 2009 leaked &gt;&gt; Network World</title>
    <dc:date>2014-01-30T13:56:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/23744</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Mitchell Ashley in November 2008: <blockquote>Too many major players are in the mobile phone market, who have and will bring iPhone-like products to market over the coming months and years. LG has already done so with the LG Voyager phone, and now Microsoft's plans for Windows Mobile 7 OS have been leaked and described in considerable detail by Inside Microsoft blogger Nathan Weinberg.<p>

With many features dubbed "iPhone compete", WM7 is all about effective uses of the touch screen, finger gestures, and additional motion gestures. Microsoft's put a lot of thought into how to make the mobile phone interface more intuitive and easier to use, even more so than Apple's iPhone.</blockquote>

Apple has never had a product, or a year, when it hasn't been "doomed to failure".]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple iphone</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:14a15103128e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://9to5mac.com/2013/10/31/apple-testing-mail-update-for-os-x-mavericks-to-fix-several-issues/">
    <title>Apple testing Mail update for OS X Mavericks to fix Gmail, stability, and smart mailbox issues &gt;&gt; 9to5Mac</title>
    <dc:date>2013-11-02T23:34:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://9to5mac.com/2013/10/31/apple-testing-mail-update-for-os-x-mavericks-to-fix-several-issues/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Many of the issues have mainly affected users of Google’s Gmail email service, and some of the issues have to do with receiving messages, sorting messages into folders, and deleting messages.<p>

Apple is aware of the issue and is testing a fix for the problem…<p>

An updated Mail application has been seeded to both Apple employees internally and testers within Apple’s customer AppleSeed program.</blockquote>

Receiving, sorting and deleting messages do sound like things you would expect an email client to do without trouble - especially as every previous version of Mac OS X since 2004 or so has handled Gmail without this farrago.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple mail gmail</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:79f40d60cc67/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:mail"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:gmail"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://9to5mac.com/2013/10/30/apple-says-fix-incoming-for-13-inch-retina-macbook-pro-trackpad-keyboard-issues-offers-interim-solution/">
    <title>Apple says fix incoming for 13-inch Retina MacBook Pro trackpad &amp; keyboard issues, offers interim solution &gt;&gt; 9to5Mac</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-31T17:24:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://9to5mac.com/2013/10/30/apple-says-fix-incoming-for-13-inch-retina-macbook-pro-trackpad-keyboard-issues-offers-interim-solution/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[According to the new support page, Apple is aware of the issue and working on a permanent fix. The fix will likely come by way of a software update via the Mac App Store. Until it is released, the issue can be remedied by closing the computer for a full minute and then waking it back up.

Great, you might as well turn it off and turn it on again, considering the speed with which SDD-based machines like the retina MacBook Pro boot up.]]></description>
<dc:subject>Apple</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:e7453028e359/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:Apple"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.macrumors.com/2013/10/30/space-gray-iphone-5s-most-popular-amid-supply-constraints-blue-leads-for-iphone-5c/">
    <title>Space Gray iPhone 5s Most Popular Amid Supply Constraints, Blue Leads for iPhone 5c &gt;&gt; Mac Rumors</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-31T17:21:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.macrumors.com/2013/10/30/space-gray-iphone-5s-most-popular-amid-supply-constraints-blue-leads-for-iphone-5c/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[43 percent of iPhone 5s units sold were space gray, while 30 percent were silver and 27 percent were gold. Supplies of the space gray model were more readily available than the silver and gold iPhones, but consumers have demonstrated a preference for the black iPhone in the past.

Something tells the the limited supply of the gold and silver iPhone 5S massively skewed these results. Let's just say that in the queue for the iPhone 5S at its launch in Covent Garden in London, everyone seemingly wanted a gold one.]]></description>
<dc:subject>iphone apple colours</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:c0e0b1e51ed8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:colours"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/10/apple-claim-that-icloud-can-store-passwords-only-locally-seems-to-be-false/">
    <title>Apple’s claim that iCloud can store passwords “only locally” seems to be false | Ars Technica</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-30T18:10:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/10/apple-claim-that-icloud-can-store-passwords-only-locally-seems-to-be-false/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Talking about Apple's claim that iCloud syncs passwords without storing data in the cloud:

If true, this would be an important advance in password management, allowing users to create long, complicated passwords on one device and have the passwords automatically sync to their other devices, but without storing data on Apple's servers.

That's a big if, according to Ars Technica.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:88a0d7e6af68/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.neglectedpotential.com/2013/10/iphone-touchscreen-accuracy/">
    <title>iPhone Touchscreen Accuracy – A lesson in understanding test requirements and goals &gt;&gt; Neglected Potential</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-29T17:53:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.neglectedpotential.com/2013/10/iphone-touchscreen-accuracy/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Nick Arnott on testing touchscreen accuracy:

Looking at the displacement of taps as you move away from the green area, there’s a definite pattern. The more you move away from the easily-tappable area, the greater the “inaccuracy” of the tap. But the inaccuracy skews in a way that would make the target slightly closer to starting position of your thumb (which is likely the most frequently used digit for tapping). As your thumb stretches out from your hand, likely positioned near the bottom of the phone, the portion of your thumb that actually comes into contact with the screen when you tap changes. Your perception of the screen also changes slightly, as when you move higher on the screen, it’s less likely that you’re viewing the screen at exactly a 90 degree angle. These are factors that this automated test does not account for. The robot doing the test is viewing its tap target at a perpendicular angle to the screen. It is also tapping at a perpendicular angle every time. This isn’t generally how people interact with their phones.

Not all touchscreens respond linearly across their entire surface, and potentially for good reason.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple gadgets touchscreen</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:808d1c25ab0b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:gadgets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:touchscreen"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/10/27/another-daylight-saving-time-bug-strikes-apples-ios-7-affects-calendar-display">
    <title>Another daylight saving time bug strikes Apple's iOS 7, affects calendar display &gt;&gt; Apple Insider</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-28T16:48:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/10/27/another-daylight-saving-time-bug-strikes-apples-ios-7-affects-calendar-display</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Several AppleInsider readers have reported the line indicating the current time is displaced by one hour in the calendar app — for example, at 12:15 p.m., the calendar app draws the "current time" line in the slot for 1:15 p.m., despite displaying the correct time beside the line and in the system notification bar. 

You'd think after three years and three major software revisions Apple could get this one right.]]></description>
<dc:subject>iPhone apple</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:88a978570988/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iPhone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://9to5mac.com/2013/10/28/recent-ios-updates-simplify-burst-mode-camera-feature-in-iphone-5s-helps-users-save-storage-space/">
    <title>Recent iOS updates simplify Burst Mode camera feature in iPhone 5s, helps users save storage space &gt;&gt; 9to5Mac</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-28T16:39:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://9to5mac.com/2013/10/28/recent-ios-updates-simplify-burst-mode-camera-feature-in-iphone-5s-helps-users-save-storage-space/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Because photos from the 8 megapixel camera take up so much space, retaining the entire group of photos could have caused a negative effect on what users could store on their iPhones. With iOS 7.0.3, Apple has rectified this potential issue by making it simple to choose favorite images from the Burst Mode session and delete the other photos.

Considering there's no micro SD expansion on the iPhone, space can certainly be at a premium sometimes.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple iphone photography</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:0ee4ca1dd5ac/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:photography"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://pxlnv.com/linklog/idiot/">
    <title>iDiot &gt;&gt; Pixel Envy</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-16T21:04:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://pxlnv.com/linklog/idiot/</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>In a research note Wednesday, Brian White of Topeka Capital Markets says the 'iTV' will be…</blockquote>

No, read on, really. You'll howl. (From April, but still funny.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple itv</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:c81d0286ce03/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:itv"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/blogs/a1a33778-88b7-452a-9133-c955812f8910/entry/why_a_former_apple_hater_thinks_all_byod_devices_should_be_ios?lang=en">
    <title>Why a (former) Apple hater thinks all BYOD devices should be iOS &gt;&gt; IBM Endpoint Management blog</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-13T20:10:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/blogs/a1a33778-88b7-452a-9133-c955812f8910/entry/why_a_former_apple_hater_thinks_all_byod_devices_should_be_ios?lang=en</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>So, why does someone, who obviously has no love for Apple, think they are the best platform for BYOD? Because Apple has embraced the enterprise. Plain and simple. They have provided great APIs for MDM vendors to leverage so we can help enable an incredibly secure platform for mobile computing.  In my opinion, the best platform. Their data segregation between apps and the managed app capability are great for BYOD management. I know Blackberry fanboys will argue that, but bottom line, who wants to use a Blackberry?  Their BB10 devices are cool, but there aren’t any apps. If Candy Crush and Fruit Ninja aren’t there, what good are they?  And since those apps aren’t there, no one will buy them. And since no one buys them, no one develops for the platform.  More on that in another blog.<p>
And just wait till iOS 7 comes out.  It gets even better!<p> 
In iOS 7, Apple adds some great new features to make a very secure platform even more secure.</blockquote>

In ways which are listed. (Although he doesn't use an iPhone...)]]></description>
<dc:subject>ibm apple ios7 enterprise</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:c4dd74b57b4e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ibm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ios7"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:enterprise"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://techpinions.com/its-tough-competing-with-the-iphone/23835">
    <title>It’s tough competing with the iPhone &gt;&gt; Tech.pinions</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-09T15:40:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://techpinions.com/its-tough-competing-with-the-iphone/23835</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Ben Bajarin: <blockquote>Based on all the data I am seeing from demand and sales trends, it is hard not to conclude that iOS will overtake Android in the US in the near future – possibly as soon as the end of the calendar year. But perhaps the most important thing about the iPhone’s share in the premium devices sector is that other competitors have only been able to made weak inroads against it. Samsung, for example, has been spending hundreds of millions of dollars in US-based marketing, yet its share of the premium market has peaked and been trending downward on weaker-than-expected sales in 2013.</blockquote>

The Samsung point is surprising. (This is US-only.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>samsung apple</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:e5464eadca8a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://linkback.morganstanley.com/web/sendlink/webapp/f/nc4berli-3op4-g000-9283-002655211000?store=0&amp;d=TAAwAG5jNGJlcmxpLTNvcDQtZzAwMC05MjgzLTAwMjY1NTIxMTAwMA%3D%3D&amp;user=3eqgvy4t1sm63-0&amp;__gda__=1506131151_255f4cb56c165a3116d1e2216cd71671">
    <title>Apple Inc interactive risk-reward model &gt;&gt; Morgan-Stanley</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-07T17:07:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://linkback.morganstanley.com/web/sendlink/webapp/f/nc4berli-3op4-g000-9283-002655211000?store=0&amp;d=TAAwAG5jNGJlcmxpLTNvcDQtZzAwMC05MjgzLTAwMjY1NTIxMTAwMA%3D%3D&amp;user=3eqgvy4t1sm63-0&amp;__gda__=1506131151_255f4cb56c165a3116d1e2216cd71671</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Requires Flash: you get to see if you can model how Apple's future share price (and earnings per share, and installed base, and revenue) change if you tweak various elements in its product mix - eg iPhone gross margins, sales share in different countries, product lifespan, etc. 

A couple of obvious flaws are that it assumes nothing particular happening through to 2015 (no extra phones? Nothing in iPads? No new products?) nor does it explain the underlying model. Fun, but also fascinating. If anyone knows of other examples of these for different companies, please link in the comments. (Thanks #rquick for the link.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple morganstanley</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:ecab94bd3669/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:morganstanley"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/06/magazine/and-then-steve-said-let-there-be-an-iphone.html">
    <title>And then Steve said, ‘let there be an iPhone’ &gt;&gt; NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-04T21:59:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/06/magazine/and-then-steve-said-let-there-be-an-iphone.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Utterly terrific piece of investigation and storytelling by Fred Vogelstein of how the iPhone came to be - and how the demonstration by Jobs was a white-knuckle ride for the inventors. An extract: <blockquote>“I understood how it could be done,” [Tony] Fadell says. “But it’s one thing to think that, and another to take a room full of special, one-off gear and make a million phone-size versions of that in a cost-effective, reliable manner.” The to-do list was exhausting just to think about. “You had to go to LCD vendors who knew how to embed technology like this in glass; you had to find time on their line; and then you had to come up with compensation and calibrating algorithms to keep the pixel electronics from generating all kinds of noise in the touch-screen” — which sat on top of the LCD. “It was a whole project just to make the touch-screen device. We tried two or three ways of actually making the touch-screen until we could make one in enough volume that would work.”<p>

Shrinking OS X and building a multitouch screen, while innovative and difficult, were at least within the skills Apple had already mastered as a corporation. No one was better equipped to rethink OS X’s design. Apple knew LCD manufacturers because it put an LCD in every laptop and iPod. Mobile-phone physics was an entirely new field, however, and it took those working on the iPhone into 2006 to realize how little they knew.</blockquote>

Save some time and read it all.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple iphone</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:106ed8068acd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:iphone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.fosspatents.com/2013/10/sanctions-loom-large-samsung-execs-were.html">
    <title>Sanctions loom large: Samsung execs were told all terms of secret Nokia-Apple patent license &gt;&gt; FOSS Patents</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-03T20:36:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.fosspatents.com/2013/10/sanctions-loom-large-samsung-execs-were.html</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Licensing executives from Samsung and Nokia held a meeting on June 4, 2013 to discuss a patent license deal between these parties. In that meeting, a Samsung exec, Dr. Seungho Ahn, "informed Nokia that the terms of the Apple-Nokia license were known to him" and according to a declaration from Nokia's Chief Intellectual Property Officer, Paul Melin, "stated that Apple had produced the Apple-Nokia license in its litigation with Samsung, and that Samsung's outside counsel had provided his team with the terms of the Apple-Nokia license".<p>

The Melin declaration furthermore says that "to prove to Nokia that he knew the confidential terms of the Apple-Nokia license, Dr. Ahn recited the terms of the license, and even went so far as to tell Nokia that 'all information leaks.'</blockquote>

The Apple-Nokia licence was secret, and only provided to Samsung's lawyers for an expert witness to investigate - not for distribution to Samsung.

On Thursday we asked Samsung to confirm the details of the meeting. It hasn't responded so far. The judge's statement says the document was marked "Highly Confidential - Attorney Eyes Only" - yet sent to more than 50 Samsung executives without redaction. Samsung's lawyers confirmed that "dozens" of individuals had seen the document, according to the judge's statement.

The judge has told Samsung to make Ahn available for interview.]]></description>
<dc:subject>samsung nokia apple facebook</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:0b54ba73e989/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:samsung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:nokia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:facebook"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/iphone-ios-7-aiding-the-police-with-fingerprint-technology">
    <title>Why are people worrying about the NSA stealing their fingerprints? &gt;&gt; VICE UK</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-02T14:36:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/iphone-ios-7-aiding-the-police-with-fingerprint-technology</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>"We have no set of rules for this yet – there is no convention on what happens and what can be done," Sam Smith from privacy rights organisation Privacy International told me. "Can the police technically force you to unlock your phone if it’s fingerprinted? The police would argue that they can, but they don't get to unilaterally make the rules."<p>

That said, perhaps the paranoia about police being able to access your devices with a copied fingerprint is already hugely outdated. According to Val Swain from NetPol, a police watchdog group, this kind of thing has already been going on for years: "The police routinely download information from mobile phones when anyone is taken into custody, using an ACESO device. This claims to be able to access data from smartphones, including Blackberry devices, even when they are password protected.<p>

"It is not clear whether the use of fingerprint locks on mobile phones would be a significant hurdle for the police, or whether the ASECO reader is – or would quickly become – capable of by-passing the requirement for a fingerprint," she continued. "We would need more technological data in order to know that." And due to the interest of private sector companies in creating this kind of technology, Val suspects "an answer to Apple's fingerprint technology will not be far behind".</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>fingerprint apple</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:8609bd6ec27b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:fingerprint"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.citeworld.com/mobile/22481/ios-7-volume-licensing-apps-business">
    <title>Apple's new licensing for apps gives it a huge enterprise advantage &gt;&gt; CITEworld</title>
    <dc:date>2013-09-30T20:31:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.citeworld.com/mobile/22481/ios-7-volume-licensing-apps-business</link>
    <dc:creator>guardiantech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Apple's new licensing mechanism brings the traditional enterprise licensing paradigm to iOS devices and apps.<p>

Although administrators select and purchase apps through the VPP version of the App Store, apps are no longer distributed using redemption codes. Instead, the VPP store records the apps (and quantities) purchased by an organization. MDM APIs allow mobile management solutions to invite users to enroll their devices into the licensing program. As they do, administrators gain the ability to assign apps to enrolled user devices or to allow users to select apps through an enterprise app store. An administrator can then purchase additional licenses if needed.<p>

When the apps are loaded on employee devices they also become part of the user's personal App Store purchase history, allowing users to install them on other devices that are tied to their Apple ID. Essentially they behave the way App Store purchases have always behaved. When a user leaves the company, the mobile management solution can use those same APIs to revoke the license from that user. </blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple enterprise ios</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/b:5e6adda3468b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:enterprise"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:guardiantech/t:ios"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>