<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (gordonr)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from gordonr</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://complexityandmanagement.wordpress.com/2016/12/18/so-what-shall-we-do/#more-1290"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://twitter.com/remarkk/status/804407741301346304/photo/1"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://imaginarytime.wordpress.com/2015/11/21/briefly-on-complexity-and-chaos/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.hbr.org/2014/09/the-industries-plagued-by-the-most-uncertainty/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://eskokilpi.blogging.fi/2013/04/09/social-business-and-complexity/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324735104578120953311383448.html?mod=wsj_share_tweet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://complexityandmanagement.wordpress.com/2012/08/29/responding-to-complexity-and-uncertainty-the-agile-organisation/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tamarackcommunity.ca/ssi8.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/acc852ee-ac0a-11e1-a8a0-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1wwELRm1Z"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cognitive-edge.com/blog/entry/5598/fast-falls-the-even-tide/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cognitive-edge.com/blog/entry/5599/abide-overview-of-process/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Applying-Design-Thinking-and-Complexity-Theory-in-Agile-Organizations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.urbagram.net/v1/show/Living"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://simulacra.blogs.casa.ucl.ac.uk/2012/02/complexity-theory-in-cities/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/wicked_problems_problems_worth_solving#When:20:20:27Z"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://kurtrichardson.com/publications.aspx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.complexityandsociety.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2011/01/kumvana.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://nimble-b-jack.blogspot.com/2012/02/my-calm-alpha.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2012/01/rose_tinting.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://math.utsa.edu/ftp/salingar.old/InfoCities.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ecss.csregistry.org/tiki-index.php?page=Exystence+focus+documents&amp;bl#Hierarchy_Complexity_Society_by_David_Lane_University_of_Modena_and_Reggio_Emilia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anecdote.com.au/archives/2006/03/weak_signals.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://idreflections.blogspot.com/2011/12/50-posts-and-articles-that-made-me.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://edge.org/conversation/composers-as-gardeners"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sas.upenn.edu/ppe/Events/Goldstone/Goldstone2011.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cognitive-edge.com/eventsdetail.php?eventid=256"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cognitive-edge.com/education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/2/2/review1.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organizational_ecology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.iohai.com/iohai-resources/agile-lessons-ooda.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2010/08/humans_are_not_ants_agents_or.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_dependence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIU-xSoSKFw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2011/06/six_common_misperceptions_abou.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+harvardbusiness+%28HBR.org%29"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2011/06/six_common_misperceptions_abou.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/19/magazine/19Urban_West-t.html?pagewanted=3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://edge.org/conversation/geoffrey-west"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Hhu0ihG3kY"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art15/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://places.designobserver.com/feature/jane-jacobs-andy-warhol-and-the-kind-of-problem-a-community-is/25878/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/guest/2011/04/when_the_facts_wont_get_you_th.php#more"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.stockholmresilience.org/seminarandevents/stockholmseminars/previousseminars/2007/ss2007/profmartenschefferontresholdsforcatastrophicshifts.5.aeea46911a3127427980004509.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/The_adaptable_corporation_1757"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scarp.ubc.ca/courses/plan548n"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jarche.com/2011/04/social-learning-complexity-and-the-enterprise/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.grassie.net/articles/2007_re-readingeconomics.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.complexitytheoriesofcities.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/csthink.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fractalcities.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.slideshare.net/lrosenfeld/adaptable-ia-presentation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2011/03/the_mantra_of_resilience.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://communicationnation.blogspot.com/2011/02/connected-company.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2011/01/24/panarchitecture-architecting-a-network-of-resilient-renewal/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jS0zj_dYeBE"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.personalinfocloud.com/2010/12/yi_tan_with_dave_snowden.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ted.com/talks/eric_berlow_how_complexity_leads_to_simplicity.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mediate.com/articles/SusskindLbl20100222.cfm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1571-9979.2010.00278.x/full"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.taylorandfrancis.com/books/details/9780415779326/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.countablyinfinite.ca/blog/2010/05/collaboration-in-planning/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cmswire.com/cms/enterprise-20/teamwork-real-work-and-the-wicked-enterprise-008935.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.storycoloredglasses.com/2010/06/confluence.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.gravity7.com/blog/media/2010/04/is-clay-shirky-on-complexity-too.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/04/networked-networks/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2010/04/the-collapse-of-complex-business-models/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://designdialogues.com/design-thinkings-convergence-diversion/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUJviaTi7VA"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=664F2AE1160FF884"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/models/PreferentialAttachment"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://complexityandmanagement.wordpress.com/2016/12/18/so-what-shall-we-do/#more-1290">
    <title>So what shall we do? | Complexity &amp; Management Centre</title>
    <dc:date>2016-12-18T23:03:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://complexityandmanagement.wordpress.com/2016/12/18/so-what-shall-we-do/#more-1290</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[So what shall we do? (Read a bit more Adorno and Dewey for starters...) #complexity #management  ]]></description>
<dc:subject>complexity management</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://twitter.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:b9119b912197/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:management"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://twitter.com/remarkk/status/804407741301346304/photo/1">
    <title>Twitter</title>
    <dc:date>2016-12-01T19:32:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://twitter.com/remarkk/status/804407741301346304/photo/1</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[RT @remarkk: Don't know Cynefin framework? I gotcha covered. #influx #complexity #servicedesign ]]></description>
<dc:subject>servicedesign complexity influx</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://twitter.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:4f55261db119/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:servicedesign"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:influx"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://imaginarytime.wordpress.com/2015/11/21/briefly-on-complexity-and-chaos/">
    <title>Briefly on Complexity and Chaos | imaginarytime</title>
    <dc:date>2016-02-19T20:39:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://imaginarytime.wordpress.com/2015/11/21/briefly-on-complexity-and-chaos/</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Briefly on #Complexity and #Chaos:
]]></description>
<dc:subject>Chaos Complexity</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://twitter.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:d719a61af2ca/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:Chaos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:Complexity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.hbr.org/2014/09/the-industries-plagued-by-the-most-uncertainty/">
    <title>The Industries Plagued by the Most Uncertainty - Jeff Dyer, Nathan Furr, and Curtis Lefrandt - Harvard Business Review</title>
    <dc:date>2014-09-11T14:05:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.hbr.org/2014/09/the-industries-plagued-by-the-most-uncertainty/</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[We live in interesting times. #complexity  http://t.co/YQ6lElY1tf]]></description>
<dc:subject>complexity via:packrati.us</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:79f48ab5e230/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:via:packrati.us"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://eskokilpi.blogging.fi/2013/04/09/social-business-and-complexity/">
    <title>Social business and complexity – at the same time | Esko Kilpi on Interactive Value Creation</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-09T15:58:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://eskokilpi.blogging.fi/2013/04/09/social-business-and-complexity/</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Nice piece on social business & complexity from @EskoKilpi    #socbiz #complexity #connectedco]]></description>
<dc:subject>connectedco complexity socbiz</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://twitter.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:821794572cc0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:connectedco"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:socbiz"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324735104578120953311383448.html?mod=wsj_share_tweet">
    <title>Learning to Love Volatility: Nassim Nicholas Taleb on the Antifragile - WSJ.com</title>
    <dc:date>2012-11-18T21:25:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324735104578120953311383448.html?mod=wsj_share_tweet</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Taleb's new book on anti-fragility coming out. Looking forward to that. http://t.co/ckQvgtwm #complexity #antifragile]]></description>
<dc:subject>complexity via:packrati.us antifragile</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:8461e51de5ed/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:via:packrati.us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:antifragile"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://complexityandmanagement.wordpress.com/2012/08/29/responding-to-complexity-and-uncertainty-the-agile-organisation/">
    <title>Responding to Complexity and Uncertainty: The Agile Organisation « Complexity &amp; Management Centre</title>
    <dc:date>2012-09-09T13:59:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://complexityandmanagement.wordpress.com/2012/08/29/responding-to-complexity-and-uncertainty-the-agile-organisation/</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[RT @davegray: This is my idea of a perfect Sunday morning read. Complexity and organization:  #connectedco #socbiz # ...]]></description>
<dc:subject>connectedco socbiz ux entarch e20 agile complexity</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://twitter.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:ec02387fe0c8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:connectedco"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:socbiz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:entarch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:e20"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:agile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tamarackcommunity.ca/ssi8.html">
    <title>Tamarack Resource Library - Sustaining Social Innovation - Complexity</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-14T17:02:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tamarackcommunity.ca/ssi8.html</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Complexity science is not a single theory. It is the study of complex adaptive systems - the patterns of relationships within them, how they are sustained, how they self-organize and how outcomes emerge. Within the science there are many theories and concepts. The science encompasses more than one theoretical framework. Complexity science is highly interdisciplinary including biologists, anthropologists, economists, sociologists, management theorists and many others in a quest to answer some fundamental questions about living, adaptable, changeable systems." - A Complexity Science Primer]]></description>
<dc:subject>theory primer zimmerman complexity</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:93e725a2da8a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:primer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:zimmerman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/acc852ee-ac0a-11e1-a8a0-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1wwELRm1Z">
    <title>Our volatile age defies spreadsheet strategy - FT.com</title>
    <dc:date>2012-06-05T18:31:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/acc852ee-ac0a-11e1-a8a0-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1wwELRm1Z</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Now those “quants” and rocket scientists find themselves at sea. Computer models alone can no longer calculate meaningful probabilities about what will happen next in the eurozone. Instead, what really matters now in places ranging from Finland to Greece are non-quantitative issues such as political values, social cohesion and civic identity. Above all, the question of “credit” is key to working out whether bonds can ever be repaid. But this is not credit in the mathematical sense by which banks have often defined it (as a projected probability on a chart), but in the old fashioned, Latin – social – meaning (trust). The crucial variable, in other words, is whether voters have faith in their governments and central banks. Do they trust the safety of their banks? Are citizens willing to trust each other, and co-operate, when pain is imposed?]]></description>
<dc:subject>complexity trust strategy quantitative narrative</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:4d1ec1ff1e81/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:trust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:quantitative"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:narrative"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://cognitive-edge.com/blog/entry/5598/fast-falls-the-even-tide/">
    <title>Fast falls the even tide - Cognitive Edge Network Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2012-05-24T20:33:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://cognitive-edge.com/blog/entry/5598/fast-falls-the-even-tide/</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[xplain what ABIDE is.   It is a mnemonic for the things that can be managed in a complex system.  ASHEN did something similar for knowledge management.   I got increasingly irritated with consultants asking people what they knew when this did knowledge audits.  To my mind that was a meaningless question in a meaningless context.   So I developed one of the first narrative enquiry methods focused on identifying decisions made in an organisation, clustering those decisions and then asking people When you make these types of decisions: What Artifacts did you use?  What Skills are needed?  What Hheuristics are in play?  What Experience is necessary?  What (if any) Natural Talent is needed.   The results where then clustered in to knowledge objects, matched to business needs and used to create a portfolio of knowledge management projects.]]></description>
<dc:subject>abide ASHEN methodology decisionmaking complexity cynefin</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:135feb7b137c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:abide"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:ASHEN"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:methodology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:decisionmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:cynefin"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://cognitive-edge.com/blog/entry/5599/abide-overview-of-process/">
    <title>ABIDE - overview of process - Cognitive Edge Network Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2012-05-24T20:23:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://cognitive-edge.com/blog/entry/5599/abide-overview-of-process/</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[description of ABIDE - attractors, boundaries, identity, diversity, environment]]></description>
<dc:subject>davesnowden methodology abide complexity cynefin</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:c9530f8b3fb8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:davesnowden"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:methodology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:abide"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:cynefin"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Applying-Design-Thinking-and-Complexity-Theory-in-Agile-Organizations">
    <title>InfoQ: Keynote: Applying Design Thinking and Complexity Theory in Agile Organizations</title>
    <dc:date>2012-05-08T22:20:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Applying-Design-Thinking-and-Complexity-Theory-in-Agile-Organizations</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Jean Tabaka discusses using design thinking and complexity theory in order to balance and Agile adoption.]]></description>
<dc:subject>cynefin lean presentation complexity agile</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:56d41f278e2a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:cynefin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:lean"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:presentation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:agile"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.urbagram.net/v1/show/Living">
    <title>The Living City | URBAGRAM</title>
    <dc:date>2012-04-10T20:44:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.urbagram.net/v1/show/Living</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Cities are made up of physical networks of infrastructure, from buildings to roads and subway lines. But they are also made up of ﬂows of people, vehicles, information and goods. It’s these cities of ﬂow and networks of interaction which I call the living city. The living city is hard to spot, as it doesn’t tend to manifest itself in a tangible way. We move around cities. We interact with each other. But these actions leave little physical residue. The living city defines a multiplicity of invisible cities.]]></description>
<dc:subject>presentation urbagram theory complexity urbanism city</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:73bd20109eb8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:presentation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:urbagram"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:urbanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:city"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://simulacra.blogs.casa.ucl.ac.uk/2012/02/complexity-theory-in-cities/">
    <title>Complexity Theory in Cities » Simulacra</title>
    <dc:date>2012-04-09T21:52:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://simulacra.blogs.casa.ucl.ac.uk/2012/02/complexity-theory-in-cities/</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Here is a  new book on complexity and cities entitled “Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age: An Overview with Implications to Urban Planning and Design” edited by Juval Portugali, Han Meyer, Egbert Stolk and Ekim Tan with the intriguing title that what we do has come of age. Well maybe, maybe not, I leave you to be the judge of that. But it does represent a sea change. The book has a wide cast of authors and the focus is on implications for urban planning and design. My own contribution written with Stephen Marshall reviews the origins of the field, returning to Geddes, Jacobs and Alexander, and is entitled: The Origins of Complexity Theory in Cities and Planning”. Amongst those contributing are Hermann Halken, Peter Allen, Nikos Salingaros, Bill Hillier, Jeff Johnson, Hans Meyer, Egbert Stolk, Ekim Tan, Denise Pumain, Harry Timmermans, Stephen Read, Ward Rauws, Carl Gershensen, Dirk Sijmons, Theodore Zamenopolous, Katerina Alexiou, Michael Bitterman, Sevil Sarijildiz]]></description>
<dc:subject>theory book urbanism cities complexity</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:00aa8de0dfe9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:book"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:urbanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:cities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/wicked_problems_problems_worth_solving#When:20:20:27Z">
    <title>Wicked Problems: Problems Worth Solving | Stanford Social Innovation Review</title>
    <dc:date>2012-03-08T13:13:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/wicked_problems_problems_worth_solving#When:20:20:27Z</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A wicked problem is a social or cultural problem that is difficult or impossible to solve for as many as four reasons: incomplete or contradictory knowledge, the number of people and opinions involved, the large economic burden, and the interconnected nature of these problems with other problems. Poverty is linked with education, nutrition with poverty, the economy with nutrition, and so on. These problems are typically offloaded to policy makers, or are written off as being too cumbersome to handle en masse. Yet these are the problems—poverty, sustainability, equality, and health and wellness—that plague our cities and our world and that touch each and every one of us. These problems can be mitigated through the process of design, which is an intellectual approach that emphasizes empathy, abductive reasoning, and rapid prototyping.]]></description>
<dc:subject>jonkolko review book complexity wickedproblems</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:f64c2c258698/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:jonkolko"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:review"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:book"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:wickedproblems"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://kurtrichardson.com/publications.aspx">
    <title>Kurt Richardson Complexity papers</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-29T18:59:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://kurtrichardson.com/publications.aspx</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[articles from ECO and others]]></description>
<dc:subject>bibliography complexity</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:855c86be920d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:bibliography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.complexityandsociety.com/">
    <title>Complexity and Society :: Home</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-28T21:22:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.complexityandsociety.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The Institute for Research in Complexity and Society applies findings and insights from the scientific and mathematical study of complex systems to the challenges and opportunities facing today's world community. We hold that the disciplines making-up of the fields of complexity science can be of great value in fostering requisite innovations in the social, political, economic and technological arenas.]]></description>
<dc:subject>research complexity</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:3c3b62f0354f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2011/01/kumvana.php">
    <title>systems thinking / complexity</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-27T18:25:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2011/01/kumvana.php</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I also made the strong point that complex adaptive systems thinking is not the same thing as systems thinking (at least in terms of the popular meaning of that term, technically systems dynamics). I think this was well illustrated by a session earlier in the day which was advertised as being led by Peter Senge, but in practice his presence was required in Austria so we had a video recording in three parts. My tweet stream (@snowded) of the session I leave to those interested to follow. The critical point here is the difference between a CAS approach and that advocated by Senge. He also creates a false dichotomy between industrial society and a romanticized, nostalgic and inaccurate view of ancient wisdom and its connection with the land. The latter is in my opinion idealistic in the wrong sense of the word. There is far too much attention to language not action in Senge's work and we saw that with quotes from the Communist Party and Unilever. Wonderful words, but the actions ....]]></description>
<dc:subject>cynefin complexity systemsthinking snowden senge</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:857f4d3c91da/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:cynefin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:systemsthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:snowden"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:senge"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://nimble-b-jack.blogspot.com/2012/02/my-calm-alpha.html">
    <title>Jack-B-Nimble: (My) CALM Alpha</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-24T00:56:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://nimble-b-jack.blogspot.com/2012/02/my-calm-alpha.html</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[After lunch Joseph Pelrine talked about multi-ontolgical sense-making, Stacy's model, the Cynefin model and so on. What stuck with me was: High agreement in the face of high uncertainty is religion, disagreement in the face of certainty (that something has to change) is politics. Assuming uncertainty and that there is no universally applicable solution is science.]]></description>
<dc:subject>complexity cynefin calmalpha via:packrati.us</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:48dcc703cc38/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:cynefin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:calmalpha"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:via:packrati.us"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2012/01/rose_tinting.php">
    <title>Rose tinting</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-04T01:17:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2012/01/rose_tinting.php</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[presents and futures]]></description>
<dc:subject>cynefin complexity snowden change management complicated</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:f16fa601e4ad/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:cynefin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:snowden"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:management"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complicated"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://math.utsa.edu/ftp/salingar.old/InfoCities.html">
    <title>&quot;An Information Architecture Approach to Understanding Cities&quot;, by L. Andrew Coward and Nikos A. Salingaros</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-02T19:39:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://math.utsa.edu/ftp/salingar.old/InfoCities.html</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Cities are systems of information architecture. Here, "architecture" refers not to the design of buildings, but to how the components of a complex system interact. Information exchange includes visual input from the environment, personal contact and interactions, telecommunications, as well as the movement of people. Information networks provide a basis for understanding living cities and for diagnosing urban problems. This paper argues that a city works less like a commercial electronic system, and more like the human brain. As a functionally complex system, it heuristically defines its own functionality by changing connections so as to optimize how components interact. An effective city will be one with a system architecture that can respond to changing conditions. This analysis shifts the focus of understanding cities from their physical structure to the flow of information.]]></description>
<dc:subject>systems complexity planning design theory IA informationarchitecture city</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:2430f12bbdcf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:systems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:planning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:IA"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:informationarchitecture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:city"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ecss.csregistry.org/tiki-index.php?page=Exystence+focus+documents&amp;bl#Hierarchy_Complexity_Society_by_David_Lane_University_of_Modena_and_Reggio_Emilia">
    <title>Exystence focus documents</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-01T23:06:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://ecss.csregistry.org/tiki-index.php?page=Exystence+focus+documents&amp;bl#Hierarchy_Complexity_Society_by_David_Lane_University_of_Modena_and_Reggio_Emilia</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Exystence produced several focus documents during its lifetime concerned with the science of complex systems. These documents offer an overview of complexity research, as well as discussions on key objectives, challenges and ways forward.]]></description>
<dc:subject>papers research theory systems hierarchy complexity</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:bcc2ce704d50/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:papers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:systems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:hierarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.anecdote.com.au/archives/2006/03/weak_signals.html">
    <title>Anecdote: Weak signals</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-01T01:31:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.anecdote.com.au/archives/2006/03/weak_signals.html</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[But a more readable paper is by Turo Uskali, which formed  his PhD submission. See Innovation Journalism, Vol 2 No 11 2005 or ISBN 1549-9049. Uskali reviews weak signals from a journalistic viewpoint, and discusses the four main categories of weak signals in his definition: feelings, uncertain signals, almost certain signals and exact signals.]]></description>
<dc:subject>weaksignals complexity anecdote shawncallahan davesnowden</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:9975758e823c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:weaksignals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:anecdote"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:shawncallahan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:davesnowden"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://idreflections.blogspot.com/2011/12/50-posts-and-articles-that-made-me.html">
    <title>ID and Other Reflections: 50 Posts and Articles that Made Me Think in 2011</title>
    <dc:date>2012-01-27T01:00:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://idreflections.blogspot.com/2011/12/50-posts-and-articles-that-made-me.html</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[50 Posts and Articles that Made Me Think in 2011]]></description>
<dc:subject>socialbusiness enterprise2.0 theory articles complexity thoughtfarmer</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:407f09b1e75b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:socialbusiness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:enterprise2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:articles"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:thoughtfarmer"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://edge.org/conversation/composers-as-gardeners">
    <title>Composers As Gardeners | Conversation | Edge</title>
    <dc:date>2011-11-17T21:53:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://edge.org/conversation/composers-as-gardeners</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[So my feeling has been that the whole concept of how things are created and organized has been shifting for the last 40 or 50 years, and as I said, this sequence of science as cybernetics, catastrophe theory, chaos theory and complexity theory, are really all ways of us trying to get used to this idea that we have to stop thinking of top-down control as being the only way in which things could be made.]]></description>
<dc:subject>brianeno composer gardener complexity theory metaphor edge e2conf</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:f294a4e89b13/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:brianeno"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:composer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:gardener"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:metaphor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:edge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:e2conf"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sas.upenn.edu/ppe/Events/Goldstone/Goldstone2011.htm">
    <title>Goldstone 2011: Nassim Taleb on Anti-Fragility</title>
    <dc:date>2011-11-05T03:04:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.sas.upenn.edu/ppe/Events/Goldstone/Goldstone2011.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A literary essayist, distinguished professor, veteran derivatives trader and hedge fund manager, Nassim N. Taleb explores ways to live in a world we don't quite understand. His New York Times best-seller The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable uses a multi-disciplinary approach to examine the role of the black swan—a rare, unpredictable event that has a major impact—across philosophy, economics, finance, engineering, cognitive science and history. The book was hailed by The London Times as "one of the 12 most influential books since World War II." ]]></description>
<dc:subject>blackswan robust resilience antifragility theory nassimtaleb complexity video lecture</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:78cf09de4b1a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:blackswan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:robust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:resilience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:antifragility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:nassimtaleb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:lecture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://cognitive-edge.com/eventsdetail.php?eventid=256">
    <title>Cognitive Edge Event Details</title>
    <dc:date>2011-10-03T17:52:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://cognitive-edge.com/eventsdetail.php?eventid=256</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[
                
                    Attention Ottawa. Go and see @snowded on Oct 12. http://t.co/fLm9URjT  Best 3 hrs you will spend all year. #complexity #cynefin
                
            ]]></description>
<dc:subject>complexity via:packrati.us cynefin</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:9529ed16009c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:via:packrati.us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:cynefin"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://cognitive-edge.com/education">
    <title>Education - Cognitive Edge Network</title>
    <dc:date>2011-10-03T17:52:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://cognitive-edge.com/education</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Attention Ottawa. Go and see @snowded on Oct 12.   Best 3 hrs you will spend all year. #complexity #cynefin]]></description>
<dc:subject>cynefin complexity</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://twitter.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:0581ef4d6f1b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:cynefin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/2/2/review1.html">
    <title>Paul Cilliers - Complexity and Postmodernism</title>
    <dc:date>2011-08-17T05:00:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/2/2/review1.html</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I have now read through this book three times. Every reading was enjoyable and informative. I make these comments at the beginning of this review because when I saw this book announced, I dreaded reading it. The title suggested that the reader might be in for a trudge through a turgid and unintelligible assertion of the absolute relativism of knowledge with the general postmodernist programme reinforced by a turn to chaos and complexity. That is pretty well exactly what the text is not. It is clearly, indeed beautifully, written and although it seeks to reconcile poststructuralist perspectives and complexity, Cilliers is adamant in dismissing the notion that such a reconciliation provides a license for absolute relativism. This is an important book with a substantial argument to make. It is full of good things. At the same time there are important and suggestive absences in it, absences which are of very considerable significance for the general project of 'simulating society'.]]></description>
<dc:subject>complexity book review theory postmodernism toread</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:2ed01f6e2354/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:book"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:review"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:postmodernism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:toread"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organizational_ecology">
    <title>Organizational ecology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-15T16:55:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organizational_ecology</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Organizational ecology (also organizational demography and the population ecology of organizations) is a theoretical and empirical approach in the social sciences that is especially used in organizational studies. Organizational ecology utilizes insights from biology, economics, and sociology, and employs statistical analysis to try and understand the conditions under which organizations emerge, grow, and die.]]></description>
<dc:subject>organizational ecology theory complexity enterprise2.0</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:13499c6bb325/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:organizational"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:ecology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:enterprise2.0"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.iohai.com/iohai-resources/agile-lessons-ooda.html">
    <title>IOHAI, OODA Loop, Resources</title>
    <dc:date>2011-06-30T17:51:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.iohai.com/iohai-resources/agile-lessons-ooda.html</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[For the agile software development community, agility is defined by the values expressed in the agile manifesto. But in concrete terms, what does it mean for a software project to be agile? US Air Force Colonel John Boyd defined agility as the ability to operate the Observation-Orientation-Decision-Action (OODA) loop faster than an adversary. Agility therefore depends on the tempo at which we can exploit the OODA loop, and it is culture, not methodologies or tools that determine our OODA loop speed. This definition of agility has implications for the software development community. This short paper introduces Colonel Boyd, the OODA loop, the factors which influence OODA loop speed and the possible research opportunities into software engineering culture we are considering.]]></description>
<dc:subject>OODA agile decisionmaking klein complexity power decisions skill knowledge</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:cad857b03824/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:OODA"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:agile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:decisionmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:klein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:decisions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:skill"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:knowledge"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2010/08/humans_are_not_ants_agents_or.php">
    <title>Humans are not ants, agents, or angels</title>
    <dc:date>2011-06-10T18:18:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2010/08/humans_are_not_ants_agents_or.php</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I have been arguing this for some time, and over the years have found various ways to express it. On this occasion I found a neat way of summarising the differences with three I-words relating to the individual, and 3 C-words relating to the community of collective.]]></description>
<dc:subject>intention identity intuition cognition constraints coherence davesnowden complexity cognitiveedge metaphor</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:fbc36e0e8e6b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:intention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:identity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:intuition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:cognition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:constraints"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:coherence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:davesnowden"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:cognitiveedge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:metaphor"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_dependence">
    <title>Path dependence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia</title>
    <dc:date>2011-06-08T16:56:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_dependence</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Path dependence explains how the set of decisions one faces for any given circumstance is limited by the decisions one has made in the past, even though past circumstances may no longer be relevant]]></description>
<dc:subject>technology theory pathdependence complexity brianarthur</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:bd784d038d64/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:pathdependence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:brianarthur"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIU-xSoSKFw">
    <title>YouTube - Techonomy 2010: SECRETS OF SCALE (Part 1 of 3)</title>
    <dc:date>2011-06-08T05:57:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIU-xSoSKFw</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><dc:subject>geoffreywest scale complexity networks cities growth economics video youtube</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:4d171b7eb0e6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:geoffreywest"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:scale"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:cities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:growth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:youtube"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2011/06/six_common_misperceptions_abou.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+harvardbusiness+%28HBR.org%29">
    <title>Six Common Misperceptions about Teamwork  - J. Richard Hackman - The Conversation - Harvard Business Review</title>
    <dc:date>2011-06-08T05:00:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2011/06/six_common_misperceptions_abou.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+harvardbusiness+%28HBR.org%29</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Seems #HBR has finally understood the tenets of #complexity "Six Common Misperceptions about Teamwork by Hackman" ]]></description>
<dc:subject>complexity HBR</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://twitter.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:c331f8da07cf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:HBR"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2011/06/six_common_misperceptions_abou.html">
    <title>Six Common Misperceptions about Teamwork  - J. Richard Hackman - The Conversation - Harvard Business Review</title>
    <dc:date>2011-06-08T05:00:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2011/06/six_common_misperceptions_abou.html</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Seems #HBR has finally understood the tenets of #complexity "Six Common Misperceptions about Teamwork by Hackman" ]]></description>
<dc:subject>complexity HBR</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://twitter.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:f45e516ff443/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:HBR"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/19/magazine/19Urban_West-t.html?pagewanted=3">
    <title>A Physicist Turns the City Into an Equation - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2011-06-07T22:19:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/19/magazine/19Urban_West-t.html?pagewanted=3</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[While Jacobs could only speculate on the value of our urban interactions, West insists that he has found a way to “scientifically confirm” her conjectures. “One of my favorite compliments is when people come up to me and say, ‘You have done what Jane Jacobs would have done, if only she could do mathematics,’ ” West says. “What the data clearly shows, and what she was clever enough to anticipate, is that when people come together, they become much more productive.”]]></description>
<dc:subject>collaboration cities janejacobs urbanism productivity complexity geoffreywest nytimes theory research</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:e38ee95b242b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:cities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:janejacobs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:urbanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:productivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:geoffreywest"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:nytimes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:research"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://edge.org/conversation/geoffrey-west">
    <title>Why Cities Keep Growing, Corporations And People Always Die, And Life Gets Faster | Conversation | Edge</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-24T20:10:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://edge.org/conversation/geoffrey-west</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Geoffrey West: "Why Cities Keep Growing, Corporations And People Always Die, And Life Gets Faster " @edge video-feature ]]></description>
<dc:subject>cities company design connectedco complexity edge video geoffreywest organizational theory physics economics city research</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://twitter.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:dd4e18443c96/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:cities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:company"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:connectedco"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:edge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:geoffreywest"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:organizational"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:physics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:city"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:research"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Hhu0ihG3kY">
    <title>YouTube
        - ‪Risk and Resilience‬‏</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-20T21:37:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Hhu0ihG3kY</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[From possible to probable to plausible: how does your organization develop anticipatory awareness?  #cynefin #complexity]]></description>
<dc:subject>complexity cynefin via:packrati.us</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://twitter.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:ff001f65fd98/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:cynefin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:via:packrati.us"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art15/">
    <title>Ecology and Society: Panarchy: Discontinuities Reveal Similarities in the Dynamic System Structure of Ecological and Social Systems</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-20T14:44:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art15/</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[In this paper, we review the empirical evidence of discontinuous distributions in complex systems within the context of panarchy theory and discuss the significance of discontinuities for understanding emergent properties such as resilience. Over specific spatial-temporal scale ranges, complex systems can configure in a variety of regimes, each defined by a characteristic set of self-organized structures and processes. A system may remain within a regime or dramatically shift to another regime. Understanding the drivers of regime shifts has provided critical insight into system structure and resilience. Although analyses of regime shifts have tended to focus on the system level, new evidence suggests that the same system behaviors operate within scales. In essence, complex systems exhibit multiple dynamic regimes nested within the larger system, each of which operates at a particular scale.]]></description>
<dc:subject>complexity panarchy collapse systems social ecological</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:e045397f3348/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:panarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:collapse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:systems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:social"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:ecological"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://places.designobserver.com/feature/jane-jacobs-andy-warhol-and-the-kind-of-problem-a-community-is/25878/">
    <title>Jane Jacobs, Andy Warhol, and Eyes on the Street: Places: Design Observer</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-03T23:18:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://places.designobserver.com/feature/jane-jacobs-andy-warhol-and-the-kind-of-problem-a-community-is/25878/</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Accommodating antisocial or even irrational qualities is a persistent challenge in planning practice. Doing so without condescension is an even greater one. Recognizing that an urban community needs to accommodate those who value impersonality and those who thrive in modernist landscapes and those who do not wish to have any eyes on their street is critical to developing urban planning practices that will have value and enjoy broad support. But when planners instead follow what is seen as the Jacobsian path and promote a narrow spectrum of essentially middle-class and nonurban values, it should not surprise us when the community or city they hope to shape fails to respond as expected. The city is essentially heterodox, beyond the effective control of even the best-intentioned ideology.]]></description>
<dc:subject>urbanism janejacobs complexity community planning designobserver</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:5b2a0e5d7d83/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:urbanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:janejacobs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:planning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:designobserver"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/guest/2011/04/when_the_facts_wont_get_you_th.php#more">
    <title>when the fact's won't get you there</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-03T14:47:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/guest/2011/04/when_the_facts_wont_get_you_th.php#more</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Treating an issue as complex implies that the approach to building an evidentiary base shifts and that an exploritory approach should be engaged. In the literature the point of difference is described as moving from robust approaches (complicated) to resilient and adaptive strategies (complex). The table below distinguishes what would be differences in the way in which the evidence is built.]]></description>
<dc:subject>cynefin complexity inductive abductive complicated quantitative qualitative</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:fb3b4529a0b2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:cynefin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:inductive"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:abductive"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complicated"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:quantitative"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:qualitative"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.stockholmresilience.org/seminarandevents/stockholmseminars/previousseminars/2007/ss2007/profmartenschefferontresholdsforcatastrophicshifts.5.aeea46911a3127427980004509.html">
    <title>Prof. Marten Scheffer on tresholds for catastrophic shifts</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-03T14:33:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.stockholmresilience.org/seminarandevents/stockholmseminars/previousseminars/2007/ss2007/profmartenschefferontresholdsforcatastrophicshifts.5.aeea46911a3127427980004509.html</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Understanding how such transitions come about in complex systems such as human societies, ecosystems and the climate system is a major challenge. However, in a time where pressures on such systems steadily increase, insight the mechanisms for catastrophic shifts may help predicting such transitions, or even managing systems for enhanced resilience against unwanted shifts.]]></description>
<dc:subject>resilience panarchy complexity</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:351332c16acb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:resilience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:panarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/The_adaptable_corporation_1757">
    <title>Adapting to long-term changes in the business environment - McKinsey Quarterly - Organization - Strategic Organization</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-02T23:43:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/The_adaptable_corporation_1757</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The adaptable corporation<br />
To survive, organizations must execute in the present and adapt to the future. Few of them manage to do both well.]]></description>
<dc:subject>connectedco beinhocker corporation organization design theory adaptation complexity future</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:eb092e30c16c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:connectedco"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:beinhocker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:corporation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:organization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:adaptation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:future"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.scarp.ubc.ca/courses/plan548n">
    <title>Global Change, Complexity and Panarchy: The 21st Century Context of Planning | SCARP</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-02T23:43:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.scarp.ubc.ca/courses/plan548n</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This course examines global change and complex systems dynamics through the lens of panarchy theory. The term ‘panarchy’ was coined to describe the overlapping hierarchical structure of the complex ecosystems (lakes, forests, grasslands, etc.), human systems (governance systems, industrial sectors, corporations, settlements, etc.), and combined (socio-ecological) systems that now make up the ecosphere. Panarchy theory describes how all such subsystems are interconnected within a global hierarchy in characteristic, never-ending adaptive cycles of growth, accumulation, release [ also called ‘collapse’ or ‘creative destruction’] and renewal  “that take place in nested sets at scales ranging from a leaf to the biosphere over periods from days to geological epochs, and from the scales of a family to a socio-political region over periods from years to centuries (Holling 2001, 392)”.]]></description>
<dc:subject>planning scarp complexity panarchy UBC course theory</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:2a0a7cfb448b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:planning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:scarp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:panarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:UBC"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:course"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:theory"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.jarche.com/2011/04/social-learning-complexity-and-the-enterprise/">
    <title>Harold Jarche » Social Learning, Complexity and the Enterprise</title>
    <dc:date>2011-04-21T21:19:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.jarche.com/2011/04/social-learning-complexity-and-the-enterprise/</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Why is social learning important for today’s enterprise?]]></description>
<dc:subject>social learning complexity enterprise2.0 haroldjarche</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:87b37c9800dd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:social"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:enterprise2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:haroldjarche"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.grassie.net/articles/2007_re-readingeconomics.html">
    <title>Review of Eric Beinhocker's The Origin of Wealth :: William Grassie</title>
    <dc:date>2011-04-18T20:35:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.grassie.net/articles/2007_re-readingeconomics.html</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The genius of the book is Eric Beinhocker’s grand synthesis of diverse fields of research, including physics, evolutionary biology, anthropology, psychology, game theory, information theory, and economic history, all to tell the big story about why traditional neo-classical economic theory fails, and how “Complexity Economics” works.  The book includes sections on how to rethink the role of governments and private sectors, as well as how Complexity Economics might impact corporate management and strategic planning.]]></description>
<dc:subject>beinhocker complexity economics theory wealth review</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:9345d20d1adf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:beinhocker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:wealth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:review"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.complexitytheoriesofcities.com/">
    <title>www.complexitytheoriesofcities.com</title>
    <dc:date>2011-04-16T00:43:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.complexitytheoriesofcities.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[U-Lab is a research centre of the Delft University of Technology addressing the increasing complexity of the composition, construction, development and use of urban patterns and the role urban design can play to understand and manipulate this complexity.<br />
<br />
The aim of U-lab is to strengthen urban design as a technical-scientific discipline by the development of new instruments and methods, which create new ways of understanding and interpreting present-day urban realities, as well as new ways of working at the urban realities of tomorrow.]]></description>
<dc:subject>complexity urban theory university research</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:d945faadddbf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:urban"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:university"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:research"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/csthink.html">
    <title>Cybernetics and Systems Thinkers</title>
    <dc:date>2011-04-12T20:56:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/csthink.html</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The following is a list of the most influential theorists in the field of cybernetics and systems theory and related domains, with links to their biographies, info about their work or their home page (for those that are still alive). Their most important publications can be found in our list of basic books and papers on the domain. The role some of them played in the development of the field is discussed in our history of cybernetics and systems.]]></description>
<dc:subject>cybernetics theory systems design planning complexity authors</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:81cea80c07cd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:cybernetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:systems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:planning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:authors"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.fractalcities.org/">
    <title>UCL Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis - Fractal Cities Book</title>
    <dc:date>2011-04-11T18:16:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.fractalcities.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Michael Batty & Paul Longley (1994)<br />
Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function<br />
(Academic Press, San Diego, CA and London)]]></description>
<dc:subject>urban city fractal complexity book architecture</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:29702b8380ad/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:urban"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:city"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:fractal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:book"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:architecture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.slideshare.net/lrosenfeld/adaptable-ia-presentation">
    <title>Adaptable Information Workshop slides</title>
    <dc:date>2011-04-05T21:03:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.slideshare.net/lrosenfeld/adaptable-ia-presentation</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><dc:subject>complexity IA information architecture UX louisrosenfeld</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:d7b23859406f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:IA"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:information"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:architecture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:UX"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:louisrosenfeld"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2011/03/the_mantra_of_resilience.php">
    <title>The mantra of resilience</title>
    <dc:date>2011-03-10T21:26:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2011/03/the_mantra_of_resilience.php</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The mantra of resilience is early detection, fast recovery, rapid exploitation.]]></description>
<dc:subject>resilience complexity davesnowden cynefin cognitiveedge induction abduction</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:535189d4cb59/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:resilience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:davesnowden"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:cynefin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:cognitiveedge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:induction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:abduction"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://communicationnation.blogspot.com/2011/02/connected-company.html">
    <title>Communication Nation: The connected company</title>
    <dc:date>2011-02-09T03:18:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://communicationnation.blogspot.com/2011/02/connected-company.html</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The connected company:  Really great post from @davegray @dachisgroup on Social Business Design!!]]></description>
<dc:subject>city design complexity planning organization organism davegray dachis network sbs2011</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://twitter.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:52bd5e0014b6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:city"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:planning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:organization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:organism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:davegray"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:dachis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:network"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:sbs2011"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2011/01/24/panarchitecture-architecting-a-network-of-resilient-renewal/">
    <title>Panarchitecture: Architecting a Network of Resilient Renewal</title>
    <dc:date>2011-01-30T04:44:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.gartner.com/nick_gall/2011/01/24/panarchitecture-architecting-a-network-of-resilient-renewal/</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Panarchitecture is a kind of hybrid thinking that combines insights and practices from architectural thinking with those from ecological thinking—specifically the ecological thinking known as panarchy. C.S. “Buzz” Holling coined panarchy as the name of his framework for understanding the dynamics of ecosystems. The pan- in panarchy is meant to connote the Greek god Pan, who is associated with both nature and disruption]]></description>
<dc:subject>panarchy gartner complexity</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:ce09c3b70857/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:panarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:gartner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jS0zj_dYeBE">
    <title>TEDxRotterdam - Igor Nikolic - Complex adaptive systems</title>
    <dc:date>2011-01-28T01:07:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jS0zj_dYeBE</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Igor Nikolic graduated in 2009 on his dissertation: co-evolutionary process for modelling large scale socio-technical systems evolution. He received his MSc as a chemical-- and bioprocess engineer at the Delft University of Technology. He spent several years as an environmental researcher and consultant at University of Leiden where he worked on life cycle analysis and industrial ecology. In his research he specializes in applying complex adaptive systems theory and agent based modeling.<br />
On TEDxRotterdam Igor Nikolic left the audience in awe with his stunning presentation and visualizations, mapping complex systems.]]></description>
<dc:subject>complexity youtube emergence visualization sna</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:a35129ed2084/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:youtube"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:emergence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:visualization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:sna"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.personalinfocloud.com/2010/12/yi_tan_with_dave_snowden.html">
    <title>Thanks to Yi Tan Podcast on Dave Snowden's Cynefin :: Personal InfoCloud</title>
    <dc:date>2011-01-03T18:10:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.personalinfocloud.com/2010/12/yi_tan_with_dave_snowden.html</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Last week Jerry Mikcalsky’s Yi Tan Technology Community podcast was a discussion with Dave Snowden regarding his Complexity Framework Cynefin may have been the epiphany of the year for me. Jerry’s e-mail announcement provided background information so the conversation would have some depth of understanding needed to frame a good understanding (the email content is on the podcast page).
]]></description>
<dc:subject>cynefin davesnowden thomasvanderwal complexity</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:51d8310ae039/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:cynefin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:davesnowden"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:thomasvanderwal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.ted.com/talks/eric_berlow_how_complexity_leads_to_simplicity.html">
    <title>Eric Berlow: How complexity leads to simplicity | Video on TED.com</title>
    <dc:date>2010-11-23T22:19:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ted.com/talks/eric_berlow_how_complexity_leads_to_simplicity.html</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Ecologist Eric Berlow doesn't feel overwhelmed when faced with complex systems. He knows that more information can lead to a better, simpler solution. Illustrating the tips and tricks for breaking down big issues, he distills an overwhelming infographic on U.S. strategy in Afghanistan to a few elementary points.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>ted talk complexity research analysis ericberlow video</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:5a93b284890b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:ted"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:talk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:analysis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:ericberlow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:video"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.mediate.com/articles/SusskindLbl20100222.cfm">
    <title>Collaborative Rationality</title>
    <dc:date>2010-11-20T19:43:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.mediate.com/articles/SusskindLbl20100222.cfm</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[In their extraordinary new book, Planning With Complexity (Routledge, 2010), Judith Innes and David Booher make the case for a new way of knowing and deciding. They call this new approach collaborative rationality. Instrumental rationality -- the traditional way of making the case for what needs to be done and why in the public arena -- has given way to collaborative approaches to generating and justifying decisions. Innes and Booher point to negotiation theory as the foundation for this approach and use complexity science to explain why it works. They have nicknamed their theory DIAD because it builds on Diversity, Interdependence and Authentic Dialogue. Anyone who works in the public policy arena needs to know what Innes and Booher have to say about collaborative rationality.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>collaboration planning complexity rationality</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:8568d9c8643e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:planning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:rationality"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1571-9979.2010.00278.x/full">
    <title>Complexity Science and Collaborative Decision Making - Susskind - 2010 - Negotiation Journal - Wiley Online Library</title>
    <dc:date>2010-11-20T19:41:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1571-9979.2010.00278.x/full</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><dc:subject>planning complexity collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:a2a3ee204d0a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:planning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:collaboration"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.taylorandfrancis.com/books/details/9780415779326/">
    <title>Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy (Paperback) - Taylor &amp; Francis</title>
    <dc:date>2010-11-20T19:27:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.taylorandfrancis.com/books/details/9780415779326/</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Analyzing emerging practices of collaboration in planning and public policy to overcome the challenges complexity, fragmentation and uncertainty, the authors present a new theory of collaborative rationality, to help make sense of the new practices. They enquire in detail into how collaborative rationality works, the theories that inform it, and the potential and pitfalls for democracy in the twenty-first century. Representing the authors’ collective experience based upon over thirty years of research and practice, this is insightful reading for students, educators, scholars, and reflective practitioners in the fields of urban planning, public policy, political science and public administration.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>planning complexity theory book public policy</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:fbb0f78998d9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:planning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:book"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:public"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:policy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.countablyinfinite.ca/blog/2010/05/collaboration-in-planning/">
    <title>Musings and reading on collaborative rationality in urban planning and civic projects</title>
    <dc:date>2010-11-20T19:18:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.countablyinfinite.ca/blog/2010/05/collaboration-in-planning/</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Many aspects of collaborative processes mesh well with interpretive way so fknowing. They focus on particular situations rather than look for general principles; participants offer knowledge for their experience as well as from research; they challenge statements of fact and causality; and they build shared meaning around issues. Indeed collaborative dialogue is, more than anything else, a process of negotiating meanings — of problems, of evidence, of strategies, of justice or fairness, and of the nature of desirable outcomes. If meanings and values were already shared, bureaucracy could handle the issue in a routine way and experts could use established positivist principles and methodologies to solve problems. In collaborative dialogues participants listen to each other’s information and to that of experts and engage in joint learning.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>collaboration planning complexity karenfung theory knowledge</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:7e9896bc72ce/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:planning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:karenfung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:knowledge"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.cmswire.com/cms/enterprise-20/teamwork-real-work-and-the-wicked-enterprise-008935.php">
    <title>Teamwork, Real Work and the Wicked Enterprise</title>
    <dc:date>2010-11-13T02:17:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.cmswire.com/cms/enterprise-20/teamwork-real-work-and-the-wicked-enterprise-008935.php</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Some problems are such complex, entangled, multifaceted hairballs that we cannot approach them alone. They change and morph as quickly as our ability to understand them. They are known to academics as "wicked problems."

In modern enterprises, we need a new way to talk about these wicked problems, as well as new approaches to address them. Normal isn't normal anymore. Change is the norm.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>wickedproblems e20 deblavoy opentext complexity intranet</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:90b4499de434/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:wickedproblems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:e20"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:deblavoy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:opentext"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:intranet"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.storycoloredglasses.com/2010/06/confluence.html">
    <title>Story colored glasses: Confluence</title>
    <dc:date>2010-06-24T22:17:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.storycoloredglasses.com/2010/06/confluence.html</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Cynthia Kurtz on her personal history of sensemaking and cynefin, her confluence model and other frameworks.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>cynefin sensemaking complexity kurtz knowledge model</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:6fdf46c36f17/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:cynefin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:sensemaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:kurtz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:model"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.gravity7.com/blog/media/2010/04/is-clay-shirky-on-complexity-too.html">
    <title>Gravity7: Social Interaction Design by Adrian Chan: Is Clay Shirky on complexity too simplistic?</title>
    <dc:date>2010-04-16T22:11:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.gravity7.com/blog/media/2010/04/is-clay-shirky-on-complexity-too.html</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Complexity corresponds to greater organizational differentiation. The more complex an organization, the more responses it has for a greater number of environmental events or external change and stimuli. In systems theories, complexity is an intrinsic characteristic. The question is not complexity, but adaptability. Complexity, if it stands in the way of correctly perceiving phenomena, and if it prevents proper and commensurate responses to those phenomena, is a bad thing. But only on the basis of the response to change; not in and of itself.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>complexity clayshriky adrianchan</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:b4cce3e867d7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:clayshriky"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:adrianchan"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/04/networked-networks/">
    <title>Networked Networks Are Prone to Epic Failure | Wired Science | Wired.com</title>
    <dc:date>2010-04-16T18:22:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/04/networked-networks/</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Networks that are resilient on their own become fragile and prone to catastrophic failure when connected, suggests a new study with troubling implications for tightly linked modern infrastructures.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>network system theory resillience fragile failure complexity</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:e44222bc8bff/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:network"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:system"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:resillience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:fragile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:failure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2010/04/the-collapse-of-complex-business-models/">
    <title>The Collapse of Complex Business Models « Clay Shirky</title>
    <dc:date>2010-04-06T22:34:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2010/04/the-collapse-of-complex-business-models/</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Tainter’s thesis is that when society’s elite members add one layer of bureaucracy or demand one tribute too many, they end up extracting all the value from their environment it is possible to extract and then some.

The ‘and them some’ is what causes the trouble. Complex societies collapse because, when some stress comes, those societies have become too inflexible to respond. In retrospect, this can seem mystifying. Why didn’t these societies just re-tool in less complex ways? The answer Tainter gives is the simplest one: When societies fail to respond to reduced circumstances through orderly downsizing, it isn’t because they don’t want to, it’s because they can’t.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>complexity collapse clayshirky business panarchy resillience media bureacracy</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:e125ef21b02a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:collapse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:clayshirky"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:panarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:resillience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:bureacracy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://designdialogues.com/design-thinkings-convergence-diversion/">
    <title>Design Thinking’s Convergence Diversion « Design Dialogues</title>
    <dc:date>2010-04-06T22:09:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://designdialogues.com/design-thinkings-convergence-diversion/</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[My view is that transformative work leads us to become insiders committed to the worlds we care about. Design becomes secondary, a skill, that supports larger commitments to the world. And this may be the biggest difference between “Design 1.0 and Design 4.0.”
]]></description>
<dc:subject>design thinking innovation theory ideo latour complexity</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:79d8d4866fd4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:ideo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:latour"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUJviaTi7VA">
    <title>YouTube - The Case for Complexity, the Pecha Kucha way</title>
    <dc:date>2010-01-21T02:02:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUJviaTi7VA</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Mark Schenk from Anecdote uses Pecha Kucha format to describe complexity using the Cynefin framework
]]></description>
<dc:subject>cynefin complexity anecdote</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:e5467293a3d7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:cynefin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:anecdote"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=664F2AE1160FF884">
    <title>YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.</title>
    <dc:date>2010-01-18T21:34:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=664F2AE1160FF884</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[he natural world is full of awe-inspiring examples of the way nature transforms simplicity into complexity
]]></description>
<dc:subject>complexity video bbc documentary youtube</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:df736d7a9d57/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:bbc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:documentary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:youtube"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/models/PreferentialAttachment">
    <title>NetLogo Models Library: Preferential Attachment</title>
    <dc:date>2009-12-21T20:06:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/models/PreferentialAttachment</link>
    <dc:creator>gordonr</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[In some networks, a few "hubs" have lots of connections, while everybody else only has a few. This model shows one way such networks can arise.

Such networks can be found in a surprisingly large range of real world situations, ranging from the connections between websites to the collaborations between actors.

This model generates these networks by a process of "preferential attachment", in which new network members prefer to make a connection to the more popular existing members.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>complexity networks model netlogo preferentialattachment</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/b:93f74b7496d0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:model"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:netlogo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:gordonr/t:preferentialattachment"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>