<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (ger)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:ger/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from ger</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://valleywag.gawker.com/224092/the-tech-reporters-who-flack-for-second-life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.herecomeseverybody.org/2008/04/looking-for-the-mouse.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2010/01/a-rant-about-women/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2010/04/the-collapse-of-complex-business-models/"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://valleywag.gawker.com/224092/the-tech-reporters-who-flack-for-second-life">
    <title>The tech reporters who flack for Second Life</title>
    <dc:date>2010-11-20T21:22:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://valleywag.gawker.com/224092/the-tech-reporters-who-flack-for-second-life</link>
    <dc:creator>ger</dc:creator><dc:subject>secondlife journalism cshirky factchecking residents users</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:ger/b:20c13c1187d5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:ger/t:secondlife"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:ger/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:ger/t:cshirky"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:ger/t:factchecking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:ger/t:residents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:ger/t:users"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.herecomeseverybody.org/2008/04/looking-for-the-mouse.html">
    <title>Gin, Television, and Social Surplus - Here Comes Everybody</title>
    <dc:date>2010-06-18T20:28:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.herecomeseverybody.org/2008/04/looking-for-the-mouse.html</link>
    <dc:creator>ger</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["if you take Wikipedia as a kind of unit, all of Wikipedia, the whole project--every page, every edit, every talk page, every line of code, in every language that Wikipedia exists in--that represents something like the cumulation of 100 million hours of human thought. I worked this out with Martin Wattenberg at IBM; it's a back-of-the-envelope calculation, but it's the right order of magnitude, about 100 million hours of thought.


And television watching? Two hundred billion hours, in the U.S. alone, every year. Put another way, now that we have a unit, that's 2,000 Wikipedia projects a year spent watching television. Or put still another way, in the U.S., we spend 100 million hours every weekend, just watching the ads."]]></description>
<dc:subject>cognitive surplus cshirky tv wikipedia culture</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:ger/b:6b85e22bceaf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:ger/t:cognitive"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:ger/t:surplus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:ger/t:cshirky"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:ger/t:tv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:ger/t:wikipedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:ger/t:culture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2010/01/a-rant-about-women/">
    <title>A Rant About Women « Clay Shirky</title>
    <dc:date>2010-04-21T19:38:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2010/01/a-rant-about-women/</link>
    <dc:creator>ger</dc:creator><dc:subject>men women rant cshirky risks confidence</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:ger/b:82cc44098bb2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:ger/t:men"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:ger/t:women"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:ger/t:rant"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:ger/t:cshirky"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:ger/t:risks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:ger/t:confidence"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2010/04/the-collapse-of-complex-business-models/">
    <title>The Collapse of Complex Business Models « Clay Shirky</title>
    <dc:date>2010-04-21T17:48:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2010/04/the-collapse-of-complex-business-models/</link>
    <dc:creator>ger</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[good article on complexity, bureaucracies & new media: The Collapse of Complex Business Models  by @cshirky]]></description>
<dc:subject>complexity cshirky newmedia bureaucracy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:ger/b:eb481e9e2b5a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:ger/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:ger/t:cshirky"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:ger/t:newmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:ger/t:bureaucracy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>