<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (earth2marsh)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from earth2marsh</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://runthebusiness.substack.com/p/the-most-expensive-dysfunction-in"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.jsnover.com/blog/2026/02/01/welcome-to-the-room/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://netapinotes.com/api-product-strategy-more-than-just-a-feature-roadmap/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://brilliant.org/wiki/braess-paradox/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://cutlefish.substack.com/p/tbm-332-the-last-strategy-framework?publication_id=24711%1triggerShare=true&amp;r=7vo67"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://cutlefish.substack.com/p/tbm-331-strategy-and-decisiveness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://bsky.app/profile/andybudd.bsky.social/post/3lbcyzmr3pk2v"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://lethain.com/notes-on-the-crux/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://rogermartin.medium.com/can-your-strategy-pass-its-most-important-test-59293df6b3a7"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://longform.asmartbear.com/moats/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.rippling.com/blog/rippling-2024-memo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://cutlefish.substack.com/p/tbm-275-bad-strategy-why"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://read.fluxcollective.org/p/132"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://caseyaccidental.com/on-platform-shifts-and-ai/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNj6Z5CbUB0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://platforms.substack.com/p/how-to-win-at-generative-ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.amazon.com/Understanding-Michael-Porter-Essential-Competition/dp/1422160599/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=understanding+michael+porter&amp;qid=1694896223&amp;sr=8-1"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.fishmanafnewsletter.com/p/what-it-takes-to-build-great-strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://evansamek.substack.com/p/understanding-michael-porter-by-joan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://adamjohnston.substack.com/p/vision-and-strategy-are-great-a-hypothesis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://staff.tumblr.com/post/722477242948747264/tumblrs-core-product-strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.kanopy.com/en/sfpl/watch/video/87472"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/community-wisdom-meeting-with-your#%C2%A7prioritization-frameworks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://huryn.substack.com/p/templates"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://twitter.com/ibscribe/status/1625681102508785664"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://youtube.com/watch?v=uBtDN95wbKo&amp;feature=share"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://behavioralscientist.org/annie-duke-quit-mental-models-to-help-you-cut-your-losses/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://read.fluxcollective.org/p/79#%C2%A7strategy-as-mask-or-mirror"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://jackiebavaro.substack.com/p/hot-take-google-has-a-company-strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://glazkov.com/2022/08/16/embodied-strategy/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://evansamek.substack.com/p/summary-7-powers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://kwokchain.com/2020/06/19/why-figma-wins/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/no-one-knows-your-strategy-not-even-your-top-leaders/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://cutlefish.substack.com/p/tbm-3852-navigating-the-product-leadership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://cutlefish.substack.com/p/tbm-3452-words-matterstrategy-and"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focal_point_(game_theory)"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://thecompendium.cards/c/strategies-more-than-sum-of-parts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.salesforce.com/eu/learning-centre/sales/distribution-channels/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://twitter.com/shreyas/status/1320105221570228224"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://caseysoftware.com/blog/the-secret-of-developer-pricing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.ribbonfarm.com/2014/06/25/portals-and-flags/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EQzoXBsktI&amp;t=290s"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.airbase.com/blog/the-memo-that-raised-funding-in-10-days"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/getting-better-at-product-strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://svpg.com/product-strategy-insights/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vQ0vERe4LLpS8s2jzJKDPixrT-Q2Gr6AJZR4MRXFFCQUXSGuCptR9YDYjPTA2Ct0tAUBwCBmYsqUH_M/pub"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://newsletter.fintechtakes.com/p/intent-matters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://debliu.substack.com/p/best-practices-for-developing-a-product"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://svpg.com/product-strategy-overview/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://hackernoon.com/wtf-is-a-strategy-bcaa3fda9a31"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://stratechery.com/2021/the-app-store-trap-and-tech-epochs/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.amazon.com/7-Powers-Foundations-Business-Strategy-ebook/dp/B01MRLFFQ7/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&amp;keywords=7+powers&amp;qid=1632870943&amp;sr=8-1"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://productlife.to/p/how-to-build-actionable-strategies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://productlife.to/p/setting-goals-that-actually-work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://productlife.to/p/-execution-at-facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.reforge.com/blog/crossing-the-canyon-product-manager-to-product-leader"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/porter.asp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://medium.com/@gibsonbiddle/2-from-dhm-to-product-strategy-a3781b2aadca"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://boz.com/articles/strategy-tactics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dret.net/lectures/webinar-2020/strategy#strategy-matrix"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://acko.net/blog/minimum-viable-bureaucracy/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://svpg.com/product-strategy-focus/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://medium.com/swlh/the-product-manager-vs-the-strategist-49049a8e079f"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://apenwarr.ca/log/20190926"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://hbr.org/2019/02/mckinseys-three-horizons-model-defined-innovation-for-years-heres-why-it-no-longer-applies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://purplerockscissors.com/insights/pace-layering-application-strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://blog.twitter.com/official/en_us/topics/product/2018/investing-in-the-best-twitter-experience-for-you.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://philsturgeon.uk/api/2018/05/02/api-evolution-for-rest-http-apis/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://medium.com/capital-one-developers/api-product-ownership-is-key-for-api-adoption-6a12c64b2c83"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pronovix.com/blog/function-api-use-cases-case-studies-developer-portals"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://runthebusiness.substack.com/p/the-most-expensive-dysfunction-in">
    <title>The Most Expensive Dysfunction in B2B Product Companies</title>
    <dc:date>2026-03-21T18:52:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://runthebusiness.substack.com/p/the-most-expensive-dysfunction-in</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>“are there systematic practices to prevent disoriented teams in the first place?” That question led to Staying Synced on Strategy, where I laid out 4 dimensions of strategic coherence:

- legibility - is it clearly written and digestible?
- synchronicity - does the org design align with it?
- composability - is the sequencing logical?
- affordability - does the org have the stomach to actually execute it?

When one or more of these dimensions breaks down, incoherence follows.</blockquote>
<blockquote>
At the highest level, a B2B business can be broken down into 3 KPIs:

- growth (revenue generation)
- retention (revenue preservation)
- margins (revenue sustainability)
</blockquote>

<blockquote>
create users who are so successful with your product that they become your advocates 
… 
The endgame is a shared, operational understanding of what success looks like in the customer’s world, and the discipline to keep pulling the work back toward that understanding every time it drifts.
</blockquote>
]]></description>
<dc:subject>productmanagement strategy business alignment reactive</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:636a497d015a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:alignment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:reactive"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.jsnover.com/blog/2026/02/01/welcome-to-the-room/">
    <title>Welcome to the Room | Jeffrey Snover's blog</title>
    <dc:date>2026-02-09T17:40:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.jsnover.com/blog/2026/02/01/welcome-to-the-room/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[On becoming an exec as a technical fellow. The following is a speech by Satya Nadella

<blockquote>Welcome to the room!
Congratulations …. your days of whining are over​.
In this room, we deliver success, we don’t whine.​
Look, I’m not confused, I know you walk through fields of shit every day. 
Your job is to find the rose petals.
Don’t come whining that you don’t have the resources you need.​
We’ve done our homework.  
We’ve evaluated the portfolio, considered the opportunities and allocated our available resources to those opportunities.
That is what you have to work with. 
Your job is to manufacture success with the resources you’ve been allocated.
And yes – you have a hard job.
You only have 2 controls:​ 1) The clarity, culture, and energy you give your teams​; and  2) Resource allocation​.
And I want to be clear with you.
If you are in this room, you need to deliver outsized success.  
To do that, you will need to allocate resources ahead of conventional wisdom​.  
Conventional wisdom will generate conventional success and that won’t allow you to stay in this room.  
You need to have courage and be bold.
And when you do that, you may fail.
BUT.  
If you fail, I will back you if, and only if, you are “intellectually honest”.
Intellectually honest means:  
1) ​You always have a plausible theory of success​.
2) You allocate your resources in accordance to that theory 
3) You monitor your theory​ 
4) When you find it is no longer plausible, you make changes to get a new plausible theory of success.
If you are doing these things, I will back  you even if you have a failure.
….
 As long as you don’t make it a habit.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>leadership productmanagement microsoft business culture strategy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:33db512ca46a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:leadership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://netapinotes.com/api-product-strategy-more-than-just-a-feature-roadmap/">
    <title>API Product Strategy: More Than Just a Feature Roadmap</title>
    <dc:date>2025-12-16T23:57:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://netapinotes.com/api-product-strategy-more-than-just-a-feature-roadmap/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Listen, I get it: 9 out of every 10 API improvement efforts are launched in the belly of a company's engineering organization. The framing used to describe these efforts, and the APIs they produce, are natural extensions of the disciplines from which they are derived. However, shifting an organization from "API as a feature set" to "API as a strategic business driver" requires process AND language change. API product owners and change leaders must be intentional about:

Framing APIs in terms of business value, not just technical capability.
Shaping API roadmaps to align with business initiatives, not punch lists of programmatic geegaws.
Embedding API ownership, measurement, and accountability across teams.
Those things are easier said than done. But they are the difference between scattershot, unaligned efforts that are eventually abandoned when the next tech trend comes along, and ongoing API investment that drives the business forward.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>apis products strategy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:61258b204689/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:apis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:products"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://brilliant.org/wiki/braess-paradox/">
    <title>Braess' Paradox | Brilliant Math &amp; Science Wiki</title>
    <dc:date>2025-03-21T15:52:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://brilliant.org/wiki/braess-paradox/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Braess' Paradox states that, counterintuitively, adding a road to a road network could possibly impede its flow (e.g. the travel time of each driver); equivalently, closing roads could potentially improve travel times.</blockquote>
The Nash equilibrium of a game is not necessarily Pareto efficient]]></description>
<dc:subject>strategy paradox efficiency equilibrium</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:d3f7a4dfec49/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:paradox"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:efficiency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:equilibrium"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://cutlefish.substack.com/p/tbm-332-the-last-strategy-framework?publication_id=24711%1triggerShare=true&amp;r=7vo67">
    <title>TBM 332: The Last Strategy Framework You'll Ever Need</title>
    <dc:date>2025-01-09T16:23:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://cutlefish.substack.com/p/tbm-332-the-last-strategy-framework?publication_id=24711%1triggerShare=true&amp;r=7vo67</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>it's hard because of the messy, dynamic, and human contexts in which frameworks are applied. Strategy is not just about frameworks or decision-making tools; it's about negotiating a narrative, identity, and power within the organization. It's (ideally) about shifting to humility and accepting uncertainty (vs. an ironclad 50-page deck that tries to anticipate objections and squash them), which in turn enables adaptability and probabilistic thinking.

It is about making choices together</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>productmanagement strategy john_cutler</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:0a96ce017891/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:john_cutler"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://cutlefish.substack.com/p/tbm-331-strategy-and-decisiveness">
    <title>TBM 331: Strategy &amp; Decisiveness - by John Cutler</title>
    <dc:date>2025-01-04T00:41:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://cutlefish.substack.com/p/tbm-331-strategy-and-decisiveness</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Importantly, you can be decisive without a "pure" inspiring strategy. Keeping multiple irons in the fire doesn't excuse spending 50% of your time multitasking, juggling projects, and getting nothing done. Many teams point to strategy as the culprit when the real problem is figuring out a reasonable way to focus and giving teams a path to call out when the lack of focus literally becomes the highest priority.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>strategy productmanagement decisions</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:762872e61ac0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:decisions"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://bsky.app/profile/andybudd.bsky.social/post/3lbcyzmr3pk2v">
    <title>Andy Budd: &quot;Most designers think they're playing chess, where the best, most considered player usually wins. In reality they're actually playing poker, where speed of play is the most important thing, and the lost hands are already factored in. It's about</title>
    <dc:date>2024-11-19T18:04:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://bsky.app/profile/andybudd.bsky.social/post/3lbcyzmr3pk2v</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Most designers think they're playing chess, where the best, most considered player usually wins. In reality they're actually playing poker, where speed of play is the most important thing, and the lost hands are already factored in. It's about maximising the upside rather than minimising loss.

‪Andy Budd‬ ‪@andybudd.bsky.social‬
·
12m
However most execs are playing poker. They know (deep down) that they'll probably lose most hands. Their focus therefor isn't avoiding loss, but massively increasing play speed, in order to get more good hands. They win by finding a good hand and then playing it well.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>bluesky posts chess poker design executives strategy productmanagement</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:a0bce1de9a98/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:bluesky"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:posts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:chess"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:poker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:executives"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://lethain.com/notes-on-the-crux/">
    <title>Notes on The Crux | Irrational Exuberance</title>
    <dc:date>2024-10-23T01:52:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://lethain.com/notes-on-the-crux/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Challenge-based strategy is reasoning forward from your current problems to identify actions that will address those challenges
Constraint-based strategy is defining guiding policies that help everyone within your organization to understand how to craft appropriate actions of their own that are in alignment with the other decisions being made concurrently by other individuals in the same organization</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>strategy productmanagement notes books</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:b116ad1dfc27/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:notes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:books"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://rogermartin.medium.com/can-your-strategy-pass-its-most-important-test-59293df6b3a7">
    <title>Can Your Strategy Pass Its Most Important Test? | by Roger Martin | Medium</title>
    <dc:date>2024-08-03T06:05:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://rogermartin.medium.com/can-your-strategy-pass-its-most-important-test-59293df6b3a7</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[counter-positioning!

<blockquote>4) …their existing margins. Merrill Lynch probably had every necessary capability to blunt the advance of discount broker Charles Schwab or even defeat it in its early stages. But that would have meant giving up the much higher margins for full-service brokerage. Similarly, newspapers could have fought eBay but that would have meant damaging their most profitable line of business, which was classified ads</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>strategy productmanagement</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:522a6b44b8ee/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://longform.asmartbear.com/moats/">
    <title>Moats: Durable competitive advantage</title>
    <dc:date>2024-07-19T05:25:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://longform.asmartbear.com/moats/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Make sure your strategy is explicit about which moats are being constructed, and the major multi-year activities required to construct them.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>moats strategy productmanagement business</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:a7157ca4c19a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:moats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:business"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.rippling.com/blog/rippling-2024-memo">
    <title>Rippling’s 2024 Investor Memo</title>
    <dc:date>2024-05-01T22:12:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.rippling.com/blog/rippling-2024-memo</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Rippling has always taken an unusual approach to fundraising. We’ve never produced a formal Pitch Deck. Instead, I have always written an “Investor Memo” and relied on this memo to lay out the pitch for the company to prospective investors. 

We published the first version of our memo in April 2019. Since then, other companies have adopted this way of pitching investors, and a “memo” has become an acceptable alternative to a standard pitch deck with many investors. 

I’ve updated and re-written this memo with each subsequent Rippling financing round, and five years later, we’re publishing a (lightly redacted) updated version as of March 2024, below</blockquote>
from: https://www.rippling.com/blog/rippling-2024-memo]]></description>
<dc:subject>pitch productmanagement strategy inspiration rippling investors</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:607acd01d91e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:pitch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:inspiration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:rippling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:investors"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://cutlefish.substack.com/p/tbm-275-bad-strategy-why">
    <title>TBM 275: &quot;Bad&quot; Strategy. Why? - by John Cutler</title>
    <dc:date>2024-03-01T19:25:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://cutlefish.substack.com/p/tbm-275-bad-strategy-why</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Whole post is full of insights.
<blockquote>A company does not have a strategy. The individuals in a company have strategies. Individuals may be better/worse at persuading others to adopt their strategy—or merge and adapt strategies—but there is no single strategy.

What you are seeing communicated across the company is not the actual strategy. You are seeing a negotiated narrative, and there's a good chance you're not privy to all the information and context underpinning those implicit and explicit negotiations.

To continue that thought, the strategy itself is a negotiation. This may seem heretical (especially to strategy nerds). Shouldn't we pursue the objectively right strategy? Realistically, the objectively and theoretically right strategy may clash too heavily with the status quo. Strategic shifts have winners and losers, right and wrongs, threats, and promotions. "Right for who?" is a critical question. What is right for an upstart designer in the first couple years of their career may not be the same as what is right for the CFO. This is why it can be much easier to pay an outside firm to tell you the strategy. It makes it easier to accept.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>strategy productmanagement</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:d121621781d4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://read.fluxcollective.org/p/132">
    <title>🌀🗞 The FLUX Review, Ep. 132</title>
    <dc:date>2024-02-11T00:03:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://read.fluxcollective.org/p/132</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>N-ply thinking is also how we start to see systems. It’s how we start to identify the leverage points in those systems due to the observed consequences of our previous interventions. This lets us start to see the patterns that govern the complex interactions between the pieces of an unpredictable whole.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>systems lenses thinking strategy games</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:d8d45a37d79b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:systems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:lenses"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:games"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://caseyaccidental.com/on-platform-shifts-and-ai/">
    <title>On Platform Shifts and AI | Casey Accidental</title>
    <dc:date>2023-12-20T05:38:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://caseyaccidental.com/on-platform-shifts-and-ai/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>tion shifts did not happen at the same time. Platform shifts that create both technological and distribution opportunities happen in a sequence, not all at once. The internet created websites, but the search engine wouldn’t come along until later to become the dominant form of distribution. Mobile created mobile apps, but it was Facebook mobile ads, not the App Store, that became the dominant form of distribution for mobile apps. So, AI has come out and definitely created a technological shift that enables new ways to solve problems that couldn’t be done before. But AI lacks a new distribution channel. ChatGPT is “not it”, as the kids would say. At least not yet.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>ai startups strategy distribution opportunities</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:c459a8a4fa43/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:startups"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:distribution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:opportunities"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNj6Z5CbUB0">
    <title>Claimeven - Connect 4 Strategy - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2023-11-03T01:36:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNj6Z5CbUB0</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[neat!]]></description>
<dc:subject>strategy games connectfour math</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:778a5df67645/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:games"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:connectfour"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:math"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://platforms.substack.com/p/how-to-win-at-generative-ai">
    <title>How to win at Generative AI - by Sangeet Paul Choudary</title>
    <dc:date>2023-10-30T21:18:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://platforms.substack.com/p/how-to-win-at-generative-ai</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>There’s a secret to rebundling. It’s widely visible and yet largely hidden.

Everyone wants to rebundle. Everyone wants to be the hub.

Yet few actually manage to.

You can’t seat yourself at the centre of an ecosystem just because you want to.

Here’s the key to successful rebundling:

You need to own the key control point that delivers primacy of user relationship</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>bundling strategy productmanagement positioning genai</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:0979f9a5ae69/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:bundling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:positioning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:genai"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.amazon.com/Understanding-Michael-Porter-Essential-Competition/dp/1422160599/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=understanding+michael+porter&amp;qid=1694896223&amp;sr=8-1">
    <title>Amazon.com: Understanding Michael Porter: The Essential Guide to Competition and Strategy: 9781422160596: Magretta, Joan: Books</title>
    <dc:date>2023-09-16T20:31:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.amazon.com/Understanding-Michael-Porter-Essential-Competition/dp/1422160599/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=understanding+michael+porter&amp;qid=1694896223&amp;sr=8-1</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Competitive advantage. The value chain. Five forces. Industry structure. Differentiation. Relative cost. If you want to understand how companies achieve and sustain competitive success, Michael Porter’s frameworks are the foundation. But while everyone in business may know Porter’s name, many managers misunderstand and misuse his concepts.

Understanding Michael Porter sets the record straight, providing the first concise, accessible summary of Porter’s revolutionary thinking. Written with Porter’s full cooperation by Joan Magretta, his former editor at Harvard Business Review, this new book delivers fresh, clear examples to illustrate and update Porter’s ideas.

Magretta uses her wide business experience to translate Porter’s powerful insights into practice and to correct the most common misconceptions about themfor instance, that competition is about being unique, not being the best; that it is a contest over profits, not a battle between rivals; that strategy is about choosing to make some customers unhappy, not being all things to all customers.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>productmanagement books competition advantage strategy business</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:686c7a80880b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:competition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:advantage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:business"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.fishmanafnewsletter.com/p/what-it-takes-to-build-great-strategy">
    <title>WTF is Strategy? - by Adam Fishman</title>
    <dc:date>2023-09-06T00:51:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.fishmanafnewsletter.com/p/what-it-takes-to-build-great-strategy</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><dc:subject>strategy essays startups productmanagement</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:7af15bbf516c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:essays"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:startups"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://evansamek.substack.com/p/understanding-michael-porter-by-joan">
    <title>Understanding Michael Porter, by Joan Magretta</title>
    <dc:date>2023-09-06T00:49:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://evansamek.substack.com/p/understanding-michael-porter-by-joan</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>My detailed notes on this incredible distillation of the work of the true leader of business strategy (and original author of Five Forces analysis), Michael Porter.
</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>books strategy summaries</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:c91a5daf72f3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:summaries"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://adamjohnston.substack.com/p/vision-and-strategy-are-great-a-hypothesis">
    <title>Vision and Strategy are great. A Hypothesis might be what you need most.</title>
    <dc:date>2023-09-06T00:37:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://adamjohnston.substack.com/p/vision-and-strategy-are-great-a-hypothesis</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>What is a “Central Hypothesis?”
A Central Hypothesis articulates the path you believe you have for creating a product that delivers value to your customers and your business. It doesn’t capture everything about your product or your customers or your business, but it should serve as a pretty good overview of what you’re trying to accomplish.

A strong Central Hypothesis consists of four assertions:

Who do we believe is our target customer?

What core needs/problems do we believe they have?

What do we believe we can create that will address those needs/problems?

What do we believe we can measure/observe to know if we’re addressing those problems?

These are grouped into two statements: a customer statement and a product statement. Here are some examples of what this might look like for the last two companies I worked at, Shift and Plato.

Shift:

Customer Statement: Used car buyers hate the experience of working with traditional dealers, and are eager for an option that is less stressful and intense.

Product Statement: An online used car dealership with a customer-centric buying process, a great selection of competitively priced cars, and easy financing options with competitive rates will have high 60-day retention and conversion rates (Note for context: most people buy a car within 60 days of starting the shopping process).

Plato:

Customer Statement: Most software engineers and engineering leaders don’t get all the support and mentorship they need from within the organization they work for, and many are willing to share what they’ve learned with others.

Product Statement: A platform that connects engineers and eng leaders who want mentorship with a mentor who wants to help others grow will have a high percentage of new mentees completing a mentorship call within their first 28 days, and high 6 month retention rates for mentors and mentees who are completing regular mentorship calls.

</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>productmanagement strategy hypothesis vision</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:740d8656fad5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:hypothesis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:vision"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://staff.tumblr.com/post/722477242948747264/tumblrs-core-product-strategy">
    <title>Tumblr Staff — Tumblr’s Core Product Strategy</title>
    <dc:date>2023-07-10T22:41:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://staff.tumblr.com/post/722477242948747264/tumblrs-core-product-strategy</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Would be a great interview question to identify what is good or needs improvement in this...

<blockquote>The Diagnosis
In order for Tumblr to grow, we need to fix the core experience that makes Tumblr a useful place for users. The underlying problem is that Tumblr is not easy to use. Historically, we have expected users to curate their feeds and lean into curating their experience. But this expectation introduces friction to the user experience and only serves a small portion of our audience. 

Tumblr’s competitive advantage lies in its unique content and vibrant communities. As the forerunner of internet culture, Tumblr encompasses a wide range of interests, such as entertainment, art, gaming, fandom, fashion, and music. People come to Tumblr to immerse themselves in this culture, making it essential for us to ensure a seamless connection between people and content. 

To guarantee Tumblr’s continued success, we’ve got to prioritize fostering that seamless connection between people and content. This involves attracting and retaining new users and creators, nurturing their growth, and encouraging frequent engagement with the platform.

Our Guiding Principles
To enhance Tumblr’s usability, we must address these core guiding principles.

Expand the ways new users can discover and sign up for Tumblr.
Provide high-quality content with every app launch.
Facilitate easier user participation in conversations.
Retain and grow our creator base.
Create patterns that encourage users to keep returning to Tumblr.
Improve the platform’s performance, stability, and quality.
Below is a deep dive into each of these principles.

Principle 1: Expand the ways new users can discover and sign up for Tumblr.
Tumblr has a “top of the funnel” issue in converting non-users into engaged logged-in users. We also have not invested in industry standard SEO practices to ensure a robust top of the funnel. The referral traffic that we do get from external sources is dispersed across different pages with inconsistent user experiences, which results in a missed opportunity to convert these users into regular Tumblr users. For example, users from search engines often land on pages within the blog network and blog view—where there isn’t much of a reason to sign up. 

We need to experiment with logged-out tumblr.com to ensure we are capturing the highest potential conversion rate for visitors into sign-ups and log-ins. We might want to explore showing the potential future user the full breadth of content that Tumblr has to offer on our logged-out pages. We want people to be able to easily understand the potential behind Tumblr without having to navigate multiple tabs and pages to figure it out. Our current logged-out explore page does very little to help users understand “what is Tumblr.” which is a missed opportunity to get people excited about joining the site.

Actions & Next Steps

Improving Tumblr’s search engine optimization (SEO) practices to be in line with industry standards.
Experiment with logged out tumblr.com to achieve the highest conversion rate for sign-ups and log-ins, explore ways for visitors to “get” Tumblr and entice them to sign up.


Principle 2: Provide high-quality content with every app launch.
We need to ensure the highest quality user experience by presenting fresh and relevant content tailored to the user’s diverse interests during each session. If the user has a bad content experience, the fault lies with the product.

The default position should always be that the user does not know how to navigate the application. Additionally, we need to ensure that when people search for content related to their interests, it is easily accessible without any confusing limitations or unexpected roadblocks in their journey.

Being a 15-year-old brand is tough because the brand carries the baggage of a person’s preconceived impressions of Tumblr. On average, a user only sees 25 posts per session, so the first 25 posts have to convey the value of Tumblr: it is a vibrant community with lots of untapped potential. We never want to leave the user believing that Tumblr is a place that is stale and not relevant. 

Actions & Next Steps

Deliver great content each time the app is opened.
Make it easier for users to understand where the vibrant communities on Tumblr are. 
Improve our algorithmic ranking capabilities across all feeds. 


Principle 3: Facilitate easier user participation in conversations.
Part of Tumblr’s charm lies in its capacity to showcase the evolution of conversations and the clever remarks found within reblog chains and replies. Engaging in these discussions should be enjoyable and effortless.

Unfortunately, the current way that conversations work on Tumblr across replies and reblogs is confusing for new users. The limitations around engaging with individual reblogs, replies only applying to the original post, and the inability to easily follow threaded conversations make it difficult for users to join the conversation.

Actions & Next Steps

Address the confusion within replies and reblogs.
Improve the conversational posting features around replies and reblogs. 
Allow engagements on individual replies and reblogs.
Make it easier for users to follow the various conversation paths within a reblog thread. 
Remove clutter in the conversation by collapsing reblog threads. 
Explore the feasibility of removing duplicate reblogs within a user’s Following feed. 


Principle 4: Retain and grow our creator base.
Creators are essential to the Tumblr community. However, we haven’t always had a consistent and coordinated effort around retaining, nurturing, and growing our creator base.  

Being a new creator on Tumblr can be intimidating, with a high likelihood of leaving or disappointment upon sharing creations without receiving engagement or feedback. We need to ensure that we have the expected creator tools and foster the rewarding feedback loops that keep creators around and enable them to thrive.

The lack of feedback stems from the outdated decision to only show content from followed blogs on the main dashboard feed (“Following”), perpetuating a cycle where popular blogs continue to gain more visibility at the expense of helping new creators. To address this, we need to prioritize supporting and nurturing the growth of new creators on the platform.

It is also imperative that creators, like everyone on Tumblr, feel safe and in control of their experience. Whether it be an ask from the community or engagement on a post, being successful on Tumblr should never feel like a punishing experience.

Actions & Next Steps

Get creators’ new content in front of people who are interested in it. 
Improve the feedback loop for creators, incentivizing them to continue posting.
Build mechanisms to protect creators from being spammed by notifications when they go viral.
Expand ways to co-create content, such as by adding the capability to embed Tumblr links in posts.


Principle 5: Create patterns that encourage users to keep returning to Tumblr.
Push notifications and emails are essential tools to increase user engagement, improve user retention, and facilitate content discovery. Our strategy of reaching out to you, the user, should be well-coordinated across product, commercial, and marketing teams.

Our messaging strategy needs to be personalized and adapt to a user’s shifting interests. Our messages should keep users in the know on the latest activity in their community, as well as keeping Tumblr top of mind as the place to go for witty takes and remixes of the latest shows and real-life events.  

Most importantly, our messages should be thoughtful and should never come across as spammy.  

Actions & Next Steps

Conduct an audit of our messaging strategy.
Address the issue of notifications getting too noisy; throttle, collapse or mute notifications where necessary.  
Identify opportunities for personalization within our email messages. 
Test what the right daily push notification limit is. 
Send emails when a user has push notifications switched off.


Principle 6: Performance, stability and quality.
The stability and performance of our mobile apps have declined. There is a large backlog of production issues, with more bugs created than resolved over the last 300 days. If this continues, roughly one new unresolved production issue will be created every two days. Apps and backend systems that work well and don’t crash are the foundation of a great Tumblr experience. Improving performance, stability, and quality will help us achieve sustainable operations for Tumblr.

Improve performance and stability: deliver crash-free, responsive, and fast-loading apps on Android, iOS, and web.
Improve quality: deliver the highest quality Tumblr experience to our users. 
Move faster: provide APIs and services to unblock core product initiatives and launch new features coming out of Labs.


Conclusion
Our mission has always been to empower the world’s creators. We are wholly committed to ensuring Tumblr evolves in a way that supports our current users while improving areas that attract new creators, artists, and users. You deserve a digital home that works for you. You deserve the best tools and features to connect with your communities on a platform that prioritizes the easy discoverability of high-quality content. This is an invigorating time for Tumblr, and we couldn’t be more excited about our current strategy.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>tumblr strategy examples productmanagement</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:e14a7286f1d8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:tumblr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:examples"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.kanopy.com/en/sfpl/watch/video/87472">
    <title>Richard Rumelt - Intelligent Strategy | Kanopy</title>
    <dc:date>2023-04-24T21:11:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.kanopy.com/en/sfpl/watch/video/87472</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[good strategy / bad strategy but much shorter]]></description>
<dc:subject>videos video stanford talks strategy productmanagement</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:90baeb666c01/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:videos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:stanford"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:talks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/community-wisdom-meeting-with-your#%C2%A7prioritization-frameworks">
    <title>Community Wisdom: Meeting with your skip-level manager, learning to do customer interviews, prioritization frameworks, product marketing newsletters, measuring product value</title>
    <dc:date>2023-04-07T03:09:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/community-wisdom-meeting-with-your#%C2%A7prioritization-frameworks</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I love how Melissa Perri talks about strategy deployment in “Escaping the Build Trap”

“Strategy deployment is about setting the right level of goals and objectives throughout the organization to narrow the playing field so that teams can act. So, while executives might be looking at a five-year strategy, middle management is thinking in smaller strategies – yearly or quarterly – bounding the teams in a direction that allows them to make decisions on a monthly or weekly basis.</blockquote>
<blockquote>I used to ICE everything but recently stopped, as it makes “Fill in jobs (Low impact, Low effort)” as attractive as “Big bets (High Impact, High Effort)“. Therefore you’re likely to spend more time snacking on lower impact jobs rather than tasks that will make a big impact. Being at an early-stage start-up, it was far more important to focus on big bets that will move the dial. </blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>productmanagement strategy playing frameworks rice prioritization</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:72408214b92e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:playing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:frameworks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:rice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:prioritization"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://huryn.substack.com/p/templates">
    <title>Free Product Management Templates - by Paweł Huryn</title>
    <dc:date>2023-03-06T20:16:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://huryn.substack.com/p/templates</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[decent list of templates]]></description>
<dc:subject>productmanagement templates strategy gtm discovery</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:786e59a5304d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:templates"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:gtm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:discovery"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://twitter.com/ibscribe/status/1625681102508785664">
    <title>excellent thread via isaach</title>
    <dc:date>2023-02-26T16:46:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://twitter.com/ibscribe/status/1625681102508785664</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><dc:subject>addon addons productmanagement strategy markets twitter threads</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:ea29dbc83832/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:addon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:addons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:markets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:threads"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://youtube.com/watch?v=uBtDN95wbKo&amp;feature=share">
    <title>January 2023 Event | Strategic Product Positioning</title>
    <dc:date>2023-02-05T19:59:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://youtube.com/watch?v=uBtDN95wbKo&amp;feature=share</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[April Dunford ]]></description>
<dc:subject>productmanagement positioning strategy</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:af2fcf1c5ae9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:positioning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://behavioralscientist.org/annie-duke-quit-mental-models-to-help-you-cut-your-losses/">
    <title>Mental Models to Help You Cut Your Losses - By Annie Duke - Behavioral Scientist</title>
    <dc:date>2023-01-10T01:44:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://behavioralscientist.org/annie-duke-quit-mental-models-to-help-you-cut-your-losses/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>For mParticle, a SaaS (software as a service) company I’ve worked with, one of the kill criteria was a lack of a decision-maker in the room, triggering an offer of executive alignment for the next meeting. If there was no executive in the room during the first few meetings (a less certain kill criterion), the seller was instructed to offer up executive alignment at the next meeting. The seller would explain to the potential customer that, in their experience, deals go more smoothly when there are executives from both sides in the room, and offer to make sure to have an executive from their side at the next meeting if the potential customer would do the same. If the lead refused the offer, the seller would kill the deal. Translated into states and dates, “If I can’t get an executive in the room (the state) by the next meeting (the date), then I’ll kill the deal.”</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>strategy thinking deals criteria</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:b195120937f9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:deals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:criteria"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://read.fluxcollective.org/p/79#%C2%A7strategy-as-mask-or-mirror">
    <title>🌀🗞 The FLUX Review, Ep. 79 - by The FLUX Collective</title>
    <dc:date>2022-12-17T00:07:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://read.fluxcollective.org/p/79#%C2%A7strategy-as-mask-or-mirror</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Thus, to evaluate how strategic a team is, we need to look at its processes, norms, and culture. That — not the nicely-polished documents — is where the strategy lives. If incentives are structured to encourage siloed individual performance, yet our intention requires intense collaboration, our organization will struggle to be strategically coherent. If our processes are designed to be nimble and flexible, yet our intention seeks stability and long-term predictability, we will find ourselves fighting seemingly invisible strategic headwinds.

</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>strategy productmanagement collective behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:b017dbab9755/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:collective"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:behavior"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://jackiebavaro.substack.com/p/hot-take-google-has-a-company-strategy">
    <title>Hot Take: Google has a company strategy, not a product strategy</title>
    <dc:date>2022-12-04T16:48:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://jackiebavaro.substack.com/p/hot-take-google-has-a-company-strategy</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>If Google didn’t start with a conviction that they needed the product, it makes sense that they wouldn’t have the stamina to keep iterating and investing. Most other companies don’t have the money to build and launch products with such little conviction and oversight. Other companies need their products to succeed, so they try harder & smarter to make the products successful</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Google strategy productmanagement</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:40ae30008cd0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:Google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://glazkov.com/2022/08/16/embodied-strategy/">
    <title>Embodied Strategy – Dimitri Glazkov</title>
    <dc:date>2022-11-30T01:13:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://glazkov.com/2022/08/16/embodied-strategy/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Put very simply, organizations usually have two strategies: one that is stated, and one that is embodied by the organization. The first one is typically highly visible, and the second is mostly invisible and only detectable by its effects. As I mentioned before, every organization has a strategy. Even if this strategy is not stated, the presence of outcomes and the patterns they follow indicates some sort of strategy at play. It might not be the same as the stated strategy. It could be a strategy that accelerates the team’s demise. It could be a strategy that favors short-term outcomes to the long-term ones. But there’s a strategy nevertheless.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>productmanagement strategy implicit</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:525c25131514/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:implicit"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://evansamek.substack.com/p/summary-7-powers">
    <title>7 Powers, by Hamilton Helmer - by Evan Samek - Evan’s Notes</title>
    <dc:date>2022-10-20T23:33:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://evansamek.substack.com/p/summary-7-powers</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Counter positioning is characterized by a new entrant with a superior and different business model that can successfully challenge formidable incumbents while the latter remain "seemingly paralyzed and unable to respond." E.g. Vanguard (upstart) vs. Fidelity, Dell vs. Compaq, Amazon vs. Borders, Netflix vs. Blockbuster. The benefit side is clear cut: the new business model is superior in some way.

The interesting angle is the barrier side: within the counter-positioning context, the incumbent cannot pursue the new business value without severely damaging their existing business. Note that if the new business model is not attractive to the incumbent as a standalone business, it doesn't count as collateral damage. [Though it does depend on how you define your business, and whether you fall into marketing myopia.] Instead, there are three "rational" reasons, due to counter positioning, why a company might not invest.

Milk the existing business: often beneficial in the short term. However, as the entrant grows your ability to milk is lost while the uncertainty of the new business model's viability is reduced. (This is why delayed entry into the market is a rational response.)

Disbelieve or discount the potential value of the new business: common due to cognitive bias or the "history's slave" cultural trap from the incumbent's earlier success, even if the new model is judged attractive.

Disconnects between what's good for the incumbent business itself and the employees (whose jobs, compensation, etc. might be tied to that current business and eliminated if they switch) also might cause the business not to invest in an attractive new model.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>positioning strategy powers business productmanagement incumbent</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:205a861fb8a1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:positioning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:powers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:incumbent"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://kwokchain.com/2020/06/19/why-figma-wins/">
    <title>Why Figma Wins - kwokchain</title>
    <dc:date>2022-10-20T06:20:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://kwokchain.com/2020/06/19/why-figma-wins/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Our understanding of building platforms and sequencing towards them is still nascent. From how to shift the allocation of resources between a company’s core business and its potential future expansions to how to structure a platform to catalyze its growth and more. Until the playbook is well understood, it is more art than science. There are many decisions to make, including which layers should be centralized, whether the ecosystem should be driven by open source contributors or profit-seeking enterprises, how broad in scope to allow the ecosystem to grow and where to not let it grow, and more.
</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>figma design loops addition growth multiplayer platforms plugins strategy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:44474df6b87a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:figma"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:loops"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:addition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:growth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:multiplayer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:platforms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:plugins"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/no-one-knows-your-strategy-not-even-your-top-leaders/">
    <title>No One Knows Your Strategy — Not Even Your Top Leaders</title>
    <dc:date>2022-10-14T18:15:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/no-one-knows-your-strategy-not-even-your-top-leaders/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Rather than hosting another town hall, top executives should focus first on their direct reports, making sure they understand the company’s overall strategy and how their function, geography, or business unit fits into the bigger picture. One powerful way to do this: Each top executive should consistently explain why his or her unit’s objectives matter for the team and for the company as a whole.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>strategy business communication consistency</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:c94fcc99f826/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:consistency"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://cutlefish.substack.com/p/tbm-3852-navigating-the-product-leadership">
    <title>TBM 38/52: Navigating the Product Leadership Fog</title>
    <dc:date>2022-08-31T23:12:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://cutlefish.substack.com/p/tbm-3852-navigating-the-product-leadership</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>First is acknowledge that the strategic thinkers and get-it-done thinkers have similar/different needs

Both want coherence, but different types of coherence

The strategic thinkers want a sense of (and contribute to) the current thinking

The get-it-done thinkers want a sense of the stable problems they can solve

Then acknowledge that the big problem is…

Degrading trust levels

Degrading psychological safety levels

Good people leaving</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>leadership strategy productivity culture challenges</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:130ec7b73249/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:leadership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:challenges"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://cutlefish.substack.com/p/tbm-3452-words-matterstrategy-and">
    <title>TBM 34/52: Words Matter—Strategy &amp; Certainty</title>
    <dc:date>2022-08-22T23:59:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://cutlefish.substack.com/p/tbm-3452-words-matterstrategy-and</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Since the 1960s, numerous researchers have attempted to understand the perception of probabilistic words. This post describes the background and attempts to replicate the research</blockquote>
Almost certain
Highly likely
Very good chance
We believe
Likely 
Probable
Probably
Better than even
about even
probably not
we doubt
unlikely 
improbable
chances are slight
little chance
highly unlikely
almost no chance


]]></description>
<dc:subject>certainty strategy words language productmanagement</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:a4c152a486a2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:certainty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:words"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focal_point_(game_theory)">
    <title>Focal point (game theory) - Wikipedia</title>
    <dc:date>2022-08-18T00:28:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focal_point_(game_theory)</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>In game theory, a focal point (or Schelling point) is a solution that people tend to choose by default in the absence of communication. The concept was introduced by the American economist Thomas Schelling in his book The Strategy of Conflict (1960).[1] Schelling states that "(p)eople can often concert their intentions or expectations with others if each knows that the other is trying to do the same" in a cooperative situation (at page 57), so their action would converge on a focal point which has some kind of prominence compared with the environment. However, the conspicuousness of the focal point depends on time, place and people themselves. It may not be a definite solution.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>choice behavior cognition defaults psychology strategy games theory</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:553d281b6738/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:choice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:behavior"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:cognition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:defaults"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:games"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:theory"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://thecompendium.cards/c/strategies-more-than-sum-of-parts">
    <title>Strategies lead to outcomes worth more than sum of parts - The Compendium</title>
    <dc:date>2022-08-17T03:15:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://thecompendium.cards/c/strategies-more-than-sum-of-parts</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
Strategies are fundamentally about creating converging forces, where the final outcome is worth more than the sum of its parts. When you have pieces that are more than the sum of their parts you have a compounding effect. Thus strategies are also fundamentally about finding compounding effects.
</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>strategy compounding</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:9e8fe0ef688f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:compounding"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.salesforce.com/eu/learning-centre/sales/distribution-channels/">
    <title>What is a Distribution Channel? - Salesforce EMEA</title>
    <dc:date>2022-06-02T23:36:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.salesforce.com/eu/learning-centre/sales/distribution-channels/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Here’s what you should take away from this article:
What’s a distribution channel? A distribution channel is a path that a product or service could take on its way to market.
What’s a direct distribution channel? A direct distribution channel is one where a company sells directly to the consumer, usually through their website or retail store.
What’s an indirect distribution channel? If a company is using an indirect distribution channel, it means they’re using an intermediary to bring their product or service to the customer. 
How do I choose a distribution channel? When choosing a distribution channel, consider your audience, your sales goals and the product itself. Different products require different approaches.
How do I develop a distribution strategy? Developing a distribution strategy starts with focusing on the needs of the customer, deciding what distribution channels should be used, and conferring with partners on a marketing strategy."]]></description>
<dc:subject>channels marketing distribution strategy gtm</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:0ec756ffd299/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:channels"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:marketing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:distribution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:gtm"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://twitter.com/shreyas/status/1320105221570228224">
    <title>Shreyas Doshi on Twitter: &quot;“My team has a prioritization problem. Help!“ Product prioritization, a thread: (1/30)&quot; / Twitter</title>
    <dc:date>2022-04-21T20:23:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://twitter.com/shreyas/status/1320105221570228224</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Most prioritization problems are really strategy problems. 

4 strategy problems

-Acceptance: “we dont think strategy is important” 

-Creation: “we know it’s important but we dont have one”

-Substance: “we have one, but it’s flawed”

-Communication: “we have a good strategy, but the team doesnt grok it/can’t recall it/can’t describe it”]]></description>
<dc:subject>shreyas strategy productmanagement</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:86304fb5e918/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:shreyas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://caseysoftware.com/blog/the-secret-of-developer-pricing">
    <title>The Secret of Developer Pricing - Caseysoftware</title>
    <dc:date>2022-03-01T16:07:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://caseysoftware.com/blog/the-secret-of-developer-pricing</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Why do we have Developer Pricing?
Developer Pricing doesn’t exist because developers are cheap. While we are cheap, we’re willing to pay for tools that make our lives easier.

Developer Pricing exists for exactly two reasons:

First, we love building things.

Every developer wants to play with cool tools, solve interesting problems, and look at the result of their work and smile. It’s what drives people to try that new framework. It’s the entire reason Raspberry Pi exists. It’s what makes us work a little harder, hammer on that problem longer, celebrate when we figure it out, and spend a weekend trying out that bizarre side idea. Developer Pricing allows people to try out those tools for the first time. It lets us solve the problem in front of us and inspires us to tackle the next, harder one.

Second, we hate dealing with Procurement/Expense Reports.

I can’t state this strongly enough: developers hate paperwork. It’s busy work. It’s frustrating. We see it as the bs that gets in the way of real work and generally look down on anyone who’s primary job revolves around paperwork. We’d rather eat the cost of something than submit the expense report to get some nominal amount back. If we have to talk to someone in Procurement or Purchasing, the problem is 10x worse.

Now combine those:

The real purpose of developer pricing is to let developers build without doing paperwork.

And there’s a related corollary: The ideal price point is either a) small enough that the developer doesn’t care about, b) falls in the “petty cash” range of their company’s expense policy, or c) falls below the point where they need another level of approval.

Good luck with that.

"]]></description>
<dc:subject>pricing tools developers behavior cheap strategy productmanagement</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:a627a2d1245a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:pricing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:tools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:developers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:behavior"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:cheap"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.ribbonfarm.com/2014/06/25/portals-and-flags/">
    <title>Portals and Flags</title>
    <dc:date>2022-02-14T19:58:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.ribbonfarm.com/2014/06/25/portals-and-flags/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Such intellectual seduction settles the original issue not by establishing an unassailable position around it, but by turning it into a portal to a hidden universe of thought. You cannot win over everybody, only the adventurous. But winning over an adventurous minority that joins you in passing through a portal, on a journey of discovery is enough. It allows you to eventually overwhelm those who prefer to plant a flag on a conquered hill of browbeaten minds, and sit around by it awarding each other medals of honor. Because adventures tend to yield riches that make whatever was originally being contested seem worthless by comparison.


There is a role for logic within a seduction: but it isn’t to dismantle arguments. The role of logic is to undermine seduction efforts that offer more predictable increase of pleasure and decrease of pain, rather than unpredictable adventure and surprisal. To show such false seductions to be simple arrangements of carrots and sticks. That is the larger purpose of fallacy-spotting in particular: demonstrating the poverty of a promised land. There is also a role for novel insight, but it isn’t to surprise the opponent in the sense of a clever, “gotcha” reframing judo move. The role of insight — a “seeing into” — is to expose limiting assumptions and motivations that people may want to voluntarily abandon upon recognition.

In other words, logic is for warning people against simple temptations and fears, insight is for liberating them from self-limiting patterns of thought, and visibly modeled fertility of thought is for seducing them onto intellectually adventurous paths. There is nothing adversarial about any of these motives. But that does not mean they will not be resisted, because taken together they are an invitation to give up power and control, which is usually the scariest thing humans can attempt to do.]]></description>
<dc:subject>debate portals flags territory persuasion change strategy productmanagement culture</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:4aad1cb3db86/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:debate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:portals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:flags"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:territory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:persuasion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:culture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EQzoXBsktI&amp;t=290s">
    <title>Intro to Product Strategy w/ Gibson Biddle, former VP of Product at Netflix - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2022-02-09T20:41:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EQzoXBsktI&amp;t=290s</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Delight, hard-to-copy, margin enhancing]]></description>
<dc:subject>productmanagement strategy differentiation margins</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:757635d549ae/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:differentiation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:margins"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.airbase.com/blog/the-memo-that-raised-funding-in-10-days">
    <title>The investment memo that helped us raise $60M in 10 days</title>
    <dc:date>2022-01-05T19:15:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.airbase.com/blog/the-memo-that-raised-funding-in-10-days</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[nice example of a strategy doc used for fundraising]]></description>
<dc:subject>business productmanagement examples memos strategy pitch</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:0225070c74ae/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:examples"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:memos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:pitch"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/getting-better-at-product-strategy">
    <title>Getting better at product strategy - by Lenny Rachitsky</title>
    <dc:date>2021-12-05T22:45:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/getting-better-at-product-strategy</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[""]]></description>
<dc:subject>strategy productmanagement</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:8b557b466954/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://svpg.com/product-strategy-insights/">
    <title>Product Strategy - Insights - Silicon Valley Product Group</title>
    <dc:date>2021-12-05T22:44:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://svpg.com/product-strategy-insights/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The information that’s in the strategic context – the company objectives, the company scorecard/dashboard, and the product vision – is the foundation for any kind of significant insight.  So, studying this is all part of “doing your homework” as a product leader. 

Third, it’s important to realize that these insights can come from anyone or anywhere.  You might find inspiration in an industry analysis on Stratechery, a chat with a sales person, a new enabling technology, a seemingly random comment from a customer, or an academic paper.

But without that preparation you probably won’t recognize the insight even if it’s right in front of you.  My main point here is that you never know what might help you connect the dots, so always keep an eye out, and an open mind. 

All that said, there are four consistently effective and valuable sources of insights, and strong product leaders spend much of their waking hours contemplating these]]></description>
<dc:subject>strategy productmanagement</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:86ae92d5162d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vQ0vERe4LLpS8s2jzJKDPixrT-Q2Gr6AJZR4MRXFFCQUXSGuCptR9YDYjPTA2Ct0tAUBwCBmYsqUH_M/pub">
    <title>Bets, Success Metrics, and Roadmapping</title>
    <dc:date>2021-11-21T22:59:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vQ0vERe4LLpS8s2jzJKDPixrT-Q2Gr6AJZR4MRXFFCQUXSGuCptR9YDYjPTA2Ct0tAUBwCBmYsqUH_M/pub</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[""]]></description>
<dc:subject>productmanagement strategy planning bets john_cutler</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:1487a6349681/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:planning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:bets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:john_cutler"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://newsletter.fintechtakes.com/p/intent-matters">
    <title>Intent Matters in Product Development - by Alex Johnson - Fintech Takes</title>
    <dc:date>2021-11-19T23:41:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://newsletter.fintechtakes.com/p/intent-matters</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I think "Idealist" isn't the right antonym...

"There are two basic ways to approach product development. There’s the strategist’s way and the idealist’s way.

The strategist’s way starts with constraints — price, competition, margin, etc. — and works backwards. The idealist’s way starts with a (perhaps unrealistic) vision of the future — of what the customer would ideally want — and works forwards.

"]]></description>
<dc:subject>strategy intent design productmanagement</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:6714856b4b14/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:intent"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://debliu.substack.com/p/best-practices-for-developing-a-product">
    <title>Best Practices for Developing a Product Strategy</title>
    <dc:date>2021-11-19T23:16:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://debliu.substack.com/p/best-practices-for-developing-a-product</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Section 1 - Understand the Problem
Every product strategy starts with a clear and cogent problem statement.

Know what problem you want to solve and for whom.

Identify the opportunity and size it.

I often hear Product Managers say that the problem is winning more customers or beating a competitor. That is not why we build products. We are solving real needs in the world, and a product strategy should reflect that.

Define the problem: What problem are you trying to solve?
Think of your favorite product. Then think of the unique problem it is trying to solve in 10 words or less. Some of the following examples are the company’s mission statement, but not all of them. The most important thing is that the problem is clear."]]></description>
<dc:subject>strategy productmanagement</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:e33f6ace7cdb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://svpg.com/product-strategy-overview/">
    <title>Product Strategy - Overview - Silicon Valley Product Group</title>
    <dc:date>2021-11-19T22:59:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://svpg.com/product-strategy-overview/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[“Not miscalculation, bad strategy is the active avoidance of the hard work of crafting a good strategy. One common reason for choosing avoidance is the pain or difficulty of choice. When leaders are unwilling or unable to make choices among competing values and parties, bad strategy is the consequence.” – Richard Rumelt in Good Strategy/Bad Strategy

So why is product strategy so hard? Because it requires four things that are not easy for most companies: 

The first is to be willing to make tough choices on what’s really important; 
The second involves generating, identifying and leveraging insights; 
The third involves converting insights into action; 
And the fourth involves active management without resorting to micro-management.]]></description>
<dc:subject>strategy choice leadership productmanagement</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:7fbf96f153ca/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:choice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:leadership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://hackernoon.com/wtf-is-a-strategy-bcaa3fda9a31">
    <title>WTF is Strategy? | Hacker Noon</title>
    <dc:date>2021-11-05T17:26:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://hackernoon.com/wtf-is-a-strategy-bcaa3fda9a31</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[good basic primer. I'd fix the road trip example vision though!]]></description>
<dc:subject>strategy productmanagement</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:fd328d68bbc1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://stratechery.com/2021/the-app-store-trap-and-tech-epochs/">
    <title>Tech Epochs and the App Store Trap – Stratechery by Ben Thompson</title>
    <dc:date>2021-09-30T05:37:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://stratechery.com/2021/the-app-store-trap-and-tech-epochs/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The PC epoch had Windows as its operating system, productivity software as its killer app, and email was the dominant communications medium.
The Internet epoch had the browser as its operating system, search as its killer app, and social networking, particularly Facebook, was the dominant communications medium.
The mobile epoch had iOS and Android as its operating systems, the sharing economy as its killer app, and messaging was the dominant communications medium]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple computers history mobile internet strategy appstore</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:8e7a1dae439a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:computers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:mobile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:appstore"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.amazon.com/7-Powers-Foundations-Business-Strategy-ebook/dp/B01MRLFFQ7/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&amp;keywords=7+powers&amp;qid=1632870943&amp;sr=8-1">
    <title>Amazon.com: 7 Powers: The Foundations of Business Strategy eBook : Helmer, Hamilton: Kindle Store</title>
    <dc:date>2021-09-28T23:16:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.amazon.com/7-Powers-Foundations-Business-Strategy-ebook/dp/B01MRLFFQ7/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&amp;keywords=7+powers&amp;qid=1632870943&amp;sr=8-1</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[gain continued power in your market. Think of these powers like moats. The 7 Powers are:
Scale Economies
Network Economies
Counter Positioning
Switching Costs
Branding
Cornered Resource
Process Power]]></description>
<dc:subject>strategy productmanagement books competition differentiation</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:2263168cd206/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:competition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:differentiation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://productlife.to/p/how-to-build-actionable-strategies">
    <title>How to Build Actionable Strategies - by Will Lawrence - Product Life</title>
    <dc:date>2021-08-05T18:15:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://productlife.to/p/how-to-build-actionable-strategies</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["When I'm building a product strategy, the first draft takes 20-30 minutes. That’s it.

This first draft, however, contains 80% of the information I need to begin executing. This is the Pareto Principle in full swing: 20% of the work leads to 80% of the results. I’m a big believer in a low fidelity plan thats lets you quickly learn from execution. "]]></description>
<dc:subject>productmanagement strategy framework process</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:a00b1f3d4f6c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:framework"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:process"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://productlife.to/p/setting-goals-that-actually-work">
    <title>Setting Goals That Actually Work - by Will Lawrence - Product Life</title>
    <dc:date>2021-08-05T18:09:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://productlife.to/p/setting-goals-that-actually-work</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Over the last few weeks, we’ve gone deeper into product strategy principles. Here’s a tl;dr on the concepts we’ve discussed (with links if you want to learn more):

Vision - Your Northstar: The change you want in the world.

Mission - Your Route: The way you decide to bring your vision to reality.

Strategy - Your Transportation: The ways to move towards your mission.

Today, let’s add a fourth key concept to our product strategy toolbox:

Goals - Your GPS: The ways to measure progress on your strategy."]]></description>
<dc:subject>vision strategy mission productmanagement goals metrics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:6d2ce90272e7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:vision"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:mission"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:goals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:metrics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://productlife.to/p/-execution-at-facebook">
    <title>🚢 Execution at Facebook - by Will Lawrence - Product Life</title>
    <dc:date>2021-08-05T18:07:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://productlife.to/p/-execution-at-facebook</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Product managers at Facebook are responsible for two key outcomes: great strategy and great execution. A former manager explained this principle in a catchier way:

The role of a product manager is to figure out what game we're playing and how we're going to play it.

Strategy is choosing the game we're playing. It’s finding worthwhile areas to invest in and creating a compelling vision for how we can succeed in this game. A great strategy connects to the evolving need of users, aligns with the business’s direction and has a reasonable set of pillars to make progress.

Execution is how we play the game. It’s the day-to-day processes, decisions and actions we take to make progress towards our mission. Execution is what Ben’s tweet was referring to, so I’d like to spend more time here."]]></description>
<dc:subject>productmanagement facebook strategy execution</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:dc1e11c52145/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:execution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.reforge.com/blog/crossing-the-canyon-product-manager-to-product-leader">
    <title>Crossing the Canyon: Product Manager to Product Leader — Reforge</title>
    <dc:date>2021-06-29T19:30:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.reforge.com/blog/crossing-the-canyon-product-manager-to-product-leader</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Everyone seems to have their own definition of what product management actually is, and as a result, navigating a career in product management can be incredibly ambiguous and frustrating. Job titles and descriptions vary greatly across companies. The criteria for advancement within organizations can seem vague and subjective. Even worse, there's a hidden trap right in the middle of the PM career ladder where many of the brightest PMs fail — we've seen numerous careers stall at the transition from Senior Product Manager to a Product Leader (sometimes referred to as a Group Product Manager, Dir of Product, or Product Lead). Let's explore why this is the most difficult career transition for PMs."]]></description>
<dc:subject>productmanagement career transitions leadership strategy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:0a22e3e68311/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:career"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:transitions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:leadership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/porter.asp">
    <title>Porter's 5 Forces Definition</title>
    <dc:date>2021-02-09T01:45:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/porter.asp</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Understanding Porter's Five Forces
Porter's Five Forces is a business analysis model that helps to explain why various industries are able to sustain different levels of profitability. The model was published in Michael E. Porter's book, "Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors" in 1980.1﻿ The Five Forces model is widely used to analyze the industry structure of a company as well as its corporate strategy. Porter identified five undeniable forces that play a part in shaping every market and industry in the world, with some caveats. The five forces are frequently used to measure competition intensity, attractiveness, and profitability of an industry or market.

Porter's five forces are:

1. Competition in the industry

2. Potential of new entrants into the industry

3. Power of suppliers

4. Power of customers

5. Threat of substitute products"]]></description>
<dc:subject>management strategy competition forces business</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:e33f8cec7a63/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:management"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:competition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:forces"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:business"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://medium.com/@gibsonbiddle/2-from-dhm-to-product-strategy-a3781b2aadca">
    <title>#2 From DHM to Product Strategy. You have ideas to delight customers, to… | by Gibson Biddle | Medium</title>
    <dc:date>2020-11-29T04:55:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://medium.com/@gibsonbiddle/2-from-dhm-to-product-strategy-a3781b2aadca</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[long series on product strategy]]></description>
<dc:subject>productmanagement strategy Netflix</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:2001f512e8f3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:Netflix"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://boz.com/articles/strategy-tactics">
    <title>Mission, Strategy, and Tactics</title>
    <dc:date>2020-07-17T01:03:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://boz.com/articles/strategy-tactics</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["A mission statement should be short. It isn’t answering how or why but just saying plainly what you are trying to accomplish. (In fact the why is never really addressed as it should be implicit.
A mission statement should take a stance. It should not be an unobjectionable, empty slogan. It should assert a point of view strongly enough that it is a useful tool in planning and prioritizing work.
A mission statement should inspire people. You should be able to use it to recruit.
A mission statement should probably start with a verb.
A mission statement should describe something aspirational, hard, and probably not even obviously possible
A mission statement should stand the test of time. Mission statements change very rarely and may never actually be achieved or even achievable."]]></description>
<dc:subject>mission statements vision productmanagement business strategy tactics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:da0a88494a37/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:mission"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:statements"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:vision"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:tactics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dret.net/lectures/webinar-2020/strategy#strategy-matrix">
    <title>A Structured Guide to API Strategy ; Erik Wilde (@dret)</title>
    <dc:date>2020-06-11T16:41:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://dret.net/lectures/webinar-2020/strategy#strategy-matrix</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[3x2 of biz/org/tech by internal/external]]></description>
<dc:subject>apis strategy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:e02c964f1fc3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:apis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://acko.net/blog/minimum-viable-bureaucracy/">
    <title>Minimum Viable Bureaucracy — Acko.net</title>
    <dc:date>2020-05-20T17:33:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://acko.net/blog/minimum-viable-bureaucracy/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><dc:subject>culture career Management startups corporate values strategy reread</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:897147485fef/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:career"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:Management"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:startups"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:corporate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:values"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:reread"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://svpg.com/product-strategy-focus/">
    <title>Product Strategy - Focus | Silicon Valley Product Group</title>
    <dc:date>2020-02-19T00:42:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://svpg.com/product-strategy-focus/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["So many companies have some similar sort of stakeholder-driven roadmap process, where they basically are trying to find a way to “fairly” divide up the engineering capacity across the different business stakeholders.

Yet another clear example of feature teams striving to serve the business, versus product teams striving to serve the customers in ways that work for the business.

While common, this is an especially obvious example of the lack of product strategy, a lack of true focus, and more generally, a lack of product leadership.

To be fair, this way of working is rarely desired by the head of product; rather, it is usually the CEO and stakeholders that want to work this way, and the head of product is forced to serve as the facilitator.  

Whatever the reason, this is an example of a company that is prioritizing, but not focusing."]]></description>
<dc:subject>productmanagement focus priorities prioritization strategy product</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:e50b931d5fd1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:focus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:priorities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:prioritization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:product"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://medium.com/swlh/the-product-manager-vs-the-strategist-49049a8e079f">
    <title>The Product Manager vs. The Strategist - The Startup - Medium</title>
    <dc:date>2020-02-14T23:25:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://medium.com/swlh/the-product-manager-vs-the-strategist-49049a8e079f</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["How do product and strategy relate?
Product connects customer needs with business goals, to produce goods and services that people use and buy, enabling the company to compete. As a field, it has become significantly more important to effective competition within the past few decades, particularly as the tech industry has risen. The direction can come from the top (PMs execute on executives’ visions) or from the bottom (PMs weave features into marketable stories).
Strategy considers the external and internal landscape to identify market gaps and opportunities, enabling the company to compete. As a field, it’s often held close to the executive team. The role is mature, but the nature of strategic work has changed significantly in past decades: competitive advantage has shifted from being the best in the world at a particular thing to being the most adaptable to evolving markets and customer needs.
When the two come together, companies often find breakthrough successes. Perhaps one of the clearest recent examples of this is the Nespresso system: the product addressed a strong (mostly unmet) need for high-quality but also high-convenience espresso, while the strategy enabled Nestle to sustain growth through subscription sales and hardware licensing.
To put it simply, both product and strategy aim to fulfill a company’s why.
Product begins with the what.
Strategy begins with the how."]]></description>
<dc:subject>product strategy productmanagement</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:c4f929980345/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:product"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://apenwarr.ca/log/20190926">
    <title>What do executives do, anyway? - apenwarr</title>
    <dc:date>2019-09-29T22:23:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://apenwarr.ca/log/20190926</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["To paraphrase the book, the job of an executive is: to define and enforce culture and values for their whole organization, and to ratify good decisions."]]></description>
<dc:subject>business culture leadership management strategy executives</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:971981577d13/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:leadership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:management"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:executives"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://hbr.org/2019/02/mckinseys-three-horizons-model-defined-innovation-for-years-heres-why-it-no-longer-applies">
    <title>McKinsey’s Three Horizons Model Defined Innovation for Years. Here’s Why It No Longer Applies.</title>
    <dc:date>2019-02-25T23:13:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://hbr.org/2019/02/mckinseys-three-horizons-model-defined-innovation-for-years-heres-why-it-no-longer-applies</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The Three Horizons provided an incredibly useful taxonomy. The model described innovation occurring on three time horizons:

Horizon 1 ideas provide continuous innovation to a company’s existing business model and core capabilities in the short-term.
Horizon 2 ideas extend a company’s existing business model and core capabilities to new customers, markets, or targets.
Horizon 3 is the creation of new capabilities and new business to take advantage of or respond to disruptive opportunities or to counter disruption.
Each horizon requires different focus, management, tools, and goals. McKinsey suggested that to remain competitive in the long run, a company allocate its research and development dollars and resources across all three horizons.

Here’s what’s changed: In the past we assigned relative delivery time to each of the Horizons. For example, some organizations defined Horizon 1 as new features that could be delivered in the short term of three to 12 months, Horizon 2 as business model extensions that will be ready 24 to 36 months out, and Horizon 3 as creating new disruptive products or business models 36 to 72 months out. (When I say “business model” I don’t just mean private businesses, but also government agencies, nonprofits, and others who have a “mission model” instead.)

This time-based definition made sense in the 20th century when new disruptive ideas took years to research, engineer, and deliver.

That’s no longer true in the 21st century — and leadership hasn’t gotten the memo.

While traditional analysis suggests that Horizon 3 disruptive innovations take years to develop, in today’s world this is no longer the case. The three horizons are no longer bounded by time. Today, disruptive Horizon 3 ideas can be delivered as fast as ideas for Horizon 1 in the existing product line."]]></description>
<dc:subject>innovation strategy business horizons</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:c27366f63308/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:horizons"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://purplerockscissors.com/insights/pace-layering-application-strategy">
    <title>Pace Layering: An Application Strategy for Resilient Products | Purple, Rock, Scissors</title>
    <dc:date>2019-02-25T22:17:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://purplerockscissors.com/insights/pace-layering-application-strategy</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The Pace Layers Of Product Strategy
Beyond just application frameworks, Brand’s traditional pace layering framework can also help analyze product/market fit, product roadmaps, and revenue projections.

During a recent engagement with a software-as-a-service (SaaS) company, we used a pace layering framework to map out smart investments in the product backlog and future service offerings.

At the application layer, the platform was built with Ember.js, which creates a great front-end experience. However, as an unintended side effect of using Ember.js, we weren’t able to create indexable page content to serve up in Google, which eliminated the possibility of search engine marketing (SEM). For PRPL, this meant that any product growth strategy we could create had to rule out content marketing. On top of that, the company faced retargeting limitations affected at the governance layer by global GDRP and ePrivacy regulations.

The company also wanted to take a very forward-thinking approach to their design aesthetic, which always excites our design team. However, planning a UX strategy for a transactional, industrial platform based on the pace layer of fashion instead of commerce can harm your user experience more than help, which isn’t a strong ROI for your spend. Instead, a more traditional front end allowed for easier advertising integration, which offset the added cost of retrofitting the platform for data privacy compliance. "]]></description>
<dc:subject>pace layering product strategy frameworks</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:ce4d0551c311/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:pace"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:layering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:product"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:frameworks"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://blog.twitter.com/official/en_us/topics/product/2018/investing-in-the-best-twitter-experience-for-you.html">
    <title>Investing in the best Twitter experience for you</title>
    <dc:date>2018-11-19T19:44:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://blog.twitter.com/official/en_us/topics/product/2018/investing-in-the-best-twitter-experience-for-you.html</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[""]]></description>
<dc:subject>twitter api strategy timeline</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:5ed1c29137c1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:api"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:timeline"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://philsturgeon.uk/api/2018/05/02/api-evolution-for-rest-http-apis/">
    <title>API Evolution for REST/HTTP APIs | Phil Sturgeon</title>
    <dc:date>2018-05-09T20:36:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://philsturgeon.uk/api/2018/05/02/api-evolution-for-rest-http-apis/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[""]]></description>
<dc:subject>apis versioning strategy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:8fdd5b9acb6b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:apis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:versioning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://medium.com/capital-one-developers/api-product-ownership-is-key-for-api-adoption-6a12c64b2c83">
    <title>API Product Ownership is Key for API Adoption – Capital One DevExchange – Medium</title>
    <dc:date>2018-02-20T18:25:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://medium.com/capital-one-developers/api-product-ownership-is-key-for-api-adoption-6a12c64b2c83</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[solid post from James Higganbotham]]></description>
<dc:subject>apis products implementation strategy approach bestpractices</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:28655f5a1422/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:apis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:products"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:implementation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:approach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:bestpractices"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://pronovix.com/blog/function-api-use-cases-case-studies-developer-portals">
    <title>The Function of API Use Cases &amp; Case Studies on Developer Portals | Pronovix</title>
    <dc:date>2017-11-27T18:56:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://pronovix.com/blog/function-api-use-cases-case-studies-developer-portals</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><dc:subject>portals developers dx content strategy casestudies</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:ba5b7d6e80ac/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:portals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:developers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:dx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:content"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:casestudies"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>