<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (earth2marsh)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from earth2marsh</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conduit_metaphor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.linkedin.com/mwlite/feed/posts/johnpcutler_many-leaders-spent-years-learning-to-work-activity-7464829078819352576-EWRv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://archive.ph/2023.11.08-181405/https://hbr.org/2019/05/cross-silo-leadership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://phirephoenix.com/blog/2025-05-30/metrics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.figma.com/blog/welcome-to-the-wip/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://knowablemagazine.org/content/article/mind/2025/interjections-important-for-conversation-flow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://sashalaundy.com/writing/technical-skills/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonviolent_Communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://people.math.harvard.edu/~ctm/home/text/others/shannon/entropy/entropy.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://surfingcomplexity.blog/2021/08/21/the-local-nature-of-culture/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://medium.com/@ElizAyer/dont-ask-forgiveness-radiate-intent-d36fd22393a3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.wired.com/story/meredith-whittaker-signal/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://thepointmag.com/examined-life/who-wants-to-play-the-status-game-agnes-callard/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.anildash.com/2024/03/10/make-better-documents/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://davidflowerstherapy.com/my-marriageended-over-dishes/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://twitter.com/shreyas/status/1745961777257656628?t=tLc3HuP5hXt1qG0BKSknyQ&amp;s=19"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.theguardian.com/books/2021/oct/18/the-big-idea-is-it-your-personality-or-a-disorder"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.amazon.com/Crucial-Conversations-Tools-Talking-Stakes/dp/1260474186"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://twitter.com/ptr/status/1680986007976673280?s=61&amp;t=sJCHxbNq0rD0zrmLXvtcXQ"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://ncase.me/trust/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/no-one-knows-your-strategy-not-even-your-top-leaders/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/05/oral-culture-literate-culture-twitter-culture/239697/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://qaspire.com/2022/01/10/conversations-that-build-psychological-safety/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://nohello.net"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.npr.org/2021/08/09/1026185212/letter-writing-hallmark-personal-tips"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://medium.com/@johnpcutler/great-one-pagers-592ebbaf80ec"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.cindyalvarez.com/ask-cindy-what-is-the-best-way-to-help-others-understand-what-research-is-learning-and-why-its-taking-so-long/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://a9.io/glue-comic/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://joshkaufman.net/how-to-ask-useful-questions/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://medium.com/lessons-from-mckinsey/the-pyramid-principle-f0885dd3c5c7"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://hbr.org/2016/11/how-to-write-email-with-military-precision"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://theconcourse.deadspin.com/how-wile-e-coyote-explains-the-world-1752248034"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://twittercommunity.com/t/changes-to-access-token-and-secret-management/130851"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/09/people-speak-faster-less-efficient-languages/597391/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://voiceandtone.com/failure-message/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/02/22/oracle_crushes_apiary_customer_hopes/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cepro.com/article/new_sonos_api_disrupts_home_automation_integration_but_lays_solid_foundatio"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://resonate.duarte.com/#!page0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.eff.org/secure-messaging-scorecard"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://zachholman.com/talk/move-fast-break-nothing/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.sqwiggle.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cindyalvarez.com/communication/announcing-change-without-inducing-panic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://grove.io/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cindyalvarez.com/communication/the-dos-and-donts-of-cold-emailing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://status.heroku.com/incident/151"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aws.amazon.com/message/65648/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2011/04/27location_qa.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://web.archive.org/web/20160201034303/http://www.blog.voximate.com/blog/article/508/software-product-road-maps/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.rexblog.com/2010/12/17/22088"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://status.fogcreek.com/2010/05/all-services-up-previous-service-outage-postmortem.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.transparentuptime.com/2010/02/downtime-post-mortems-and-look-at.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nilvsdcbs.com/guncontrol.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.viperchill.com/important-blogging-analysis/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://billflagg.blogspot.com/2009/08/is-playfulness-good-for-business.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tinychat.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://socialcast.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.alorachistiakoff.com/2009/04/14/qualities-of-a-great-speaker/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bakertweet.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/01/12/atomization.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/truetelephone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2008/12/05/assymetrical-follow-a-core-web-20-pattern/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.infed.org/biblio/b-dialog.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://notify.me/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.uxmatters.com/MT/archives/000309.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://mkweb.bcgsc.ca/debates/?debate=mccain-obama-01#section-pos-count"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fuzzmail.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://drop.io/fax"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/05/health/05well.html?em&amp;ex=1202446800&amp;en=71c8f193a5fde0ee&amp;ei=5087%0A"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2007/12/14/valuing_ineffic.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conduit_metaphor">
    <title>Conduit metaphor - Wikipedia</title>
    <dc:date>2026-07-01T04:14:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conduit_metaphor</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Language is a conduit
edit
These commonplace examples—

You can't get your concept across to the class that way
His feelings came through to her only vaguely
They never give us any idea of what they expect
—are understood metaphorically. In 1., people do not actually "get across" concepts by talking; in 2., feelings do not really "come through to" people; and in 3., people do not in fact "give" to others their ideas, which are mental states. Listeners assemble from their own mental states a partial replica of the speakers'. These core expressions assert figuratively that language literally transfers people's mental contents to others.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>language communication metaphor linguistics thinking</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:86de667fb0b6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:metaphor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:thinking"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.linkedin.com/mwlite/feed/posts/johnpcutler_many-leaders-spent-years-learning-to-work-activity-7464829078819352576-EWRv">
    <title>Comments | LinkedIn</title>
    <dc:date>2026-05-26T04:31:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.linkedin.com/mwlite/feed/posts/johnpcutler_many-leaders-spent-years-learning-to-work-activity-7464829078819352576-EWRv</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Many leaders spent years learning to work around power on the way up. At the top, they forget others are now working around them.

That gap is where a wicked cycle starts.

A leader holds real power. Not symbolic power. Actual power over what gets rewarded, ignored, punished, and worked around.

People around them adapt. They hold back. They route around. They say the safe thing, or say nothing at all.

The leader notices. And resents it.

"Why won't anyone just be straight with me?"

They'll often complain that the environment has become political. Too much triangulation and careful phrasing. Not enough "straight talk." People strategizing instead of collaborating.

What they rarely connect is that they are the source of that.

When power is uneven, "politics" is not a personality flaw in the culture. It is a reasonable adaptation to the person in the room.

What they often miss is that the caution they're seeing is a rational response to the asymmetry they hold. Reitz and Higgins put this well: leaders underestimate how their power silences others, and overestimate how much candid feedback they actually receive.

But here's the part that makes the loop wicked.

The resentment doesn't stop at "people aren't being honest with me." It morphs into something worse. Because people are caught in the power dynamic, the leader starts to think less of them. Timid. Political. Unable to speak up. Not leadership material. Not the kind of person who "tells it like it is."

The irony....They resent the politics. They also produce it. On the way up, power was an external force to navigate, game, and surmount. They rarely carry forward the mirror image. 

Which helps explain two familiar patterns. They look externally for new people, hoping to find straight talk somewhere outside the culture they helped create. And they get preoccupied with rewarding their mirror image as it rises through the org. The person who reminds them of who they were, or wish they still were. Not the people working around them, the way they once worked around someone else. So the cycle tightens.

-Power silences people.
-Silence frustrates the leader.
-Frustration becomes contempt.
-Contempt makes people quieter, more political, more careful.
-The leader resents how "political" everything has become.
-The organization learns to work around them.
-The leader feels more isolated, more resentful, more certain the problem is everyone else's character.

And the official culture keeps insisting the door is open. This is why "speak up" initiatives so often fail. You're not fixing a courage problem. You're inside a loop.

The hard question isn't "how do we get people to be braver?"

It's whether the people with power can see themselves as part of the dynamic they're complaining about.

And whether they're willing to ask what their own position is teaching everyone else about what's safe to say.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>leadership productmanagement john_cutler power politics safety communication</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:8070d26abc5c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:leadership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:john_cutler"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:safety"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://archive.ph/2023.11.08-181405/https://hbr.org/2019/05/cross-silo-leadership">
    <title>What Cross-Silo Leadership Looks Like</title>
    <dc:date>2025-07-20T06:43:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://archive.ph/2023.11.08-181405/https://hbr.org/2019/05/cross-silo-leadership</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[https://hbr.org/2019/05/cross-silo-leadership
<blockquote>Today the most promising innovation and business opportunities require collaboration among functions, offices, and organizations. To realize them, companies must break down silos and get people working together across boundaries. But that’s a challenge for many leaders. Employees naturally default to focusing on vertical relationships, and formal restructuring is costly, confusing, and slow. What, then, is the solution? Engaging in four activities that promote horizontal teamwork: (1) developing cultural brokers, or employees who excel at connecting across divides; (2) encouraging people to ask questions in an open-ended, unbiased way that genuinely explores others’ thinking; (3) getting people to actively take other points of view; and (4) broadening employees’ vision to include more-distant networks.
By supporting these activities, leaders can help employees connect with new pools of expertise and learn from and relate to people who think very differently from them. And when that happens, interface collaboration will become second nature.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>communication organization culture connections hbr leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:ef376839e3ef/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:organization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:connections"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:hbr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:leadership"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://phirephoenix.com/blog/2025-05-30/metrics">
    <title>kill the metrics in your head | The Roof is on Phire</title>
    <dc:date>2025-05-31T06:50:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://phirephoenix.com/blog/2025-05-30/metrics</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Except the internet isn’t really set up to signal that someone is listening. You can only demonstrate that you’re paying attention by taking some step to express it: a like, a repost, a reply, an email, a rambly blog post. And because these things take energy, you’re not going to get a signal from the majority of the people you’re trying to reach.

This is a genuine problem with interactions on the internet. It’s a problem that analytics software sort of tries to solve! Shame it ballooned into this privacy-destroying behemoth that undergirds the global surveillance panopticon, but we’ve had page counters as long as we’ve been building websites—we often just want to know that we’re being heard.</blockquote>

<blockquote>Often when I start writing I discover lots of other people are writing about similar themes quite eloquently and decide maybe I didn’t have anything new to say after all. That is still the metrics-poisoned perspective, even if it’s not directly quantified, because it is still rooted in being unique or the first or whatever. The care-ful of looking at this is that these moments of confluence are themselves an indication that we exist in global conversation with one another, and that people are, indeed, listening.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>metrics analytics communication reach recognition</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:8d00496abda1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:metrics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:analytics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:reach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:recognition"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.figma.com/blog/welcome-to-the-wip/">
    <title>Welcome to the WIP | Figma Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2025-03-10T16:29:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.figma.com/blog/welcome-to-the-wip/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>a way for company leaders to indicate the importance of their feedback. It’s essentially a hashtag they put at the end of their feedback to indicate how much they care, or as the saying goes, to what degree they’re willing “to die on that hill.”

For example:

#fyi means there’s no hill to die on.
#suggestion means they’ve seen the hill but don’t feel strongly enough to commit the energy to climb it. Take it or leave it.
#recommendation means the hill was climbed. They thought about dying on it, but walked back down.
And finally, #plea means that they do, in fact, want to die on the hill. So if you see this flashtag, you better make sure it’s prioritized!</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>feedback reviews management patterns communication figma hashtags comments productmanagement</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:a8015cf4b580/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:feedback"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:reviews"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:management"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:patterns"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:figma"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:hashtags"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:comments"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://knowablemagazine.org/content/article/mind/2025/interjections-important-for-conversation-flow">
    <title>Huh? The valuable role of interjections | Knowable Magazine</title>
    <dc:date>2025-03-03T07:59:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://knowablemagazine.org/content/article/mind/2025/interjections-important-for-conversation-flow</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>For many decades, linguists regarded such utterances as largely irrelevant noise, the flotsam and jetsam that accumulate on the margins of language when speakers aren’t as articulate as they’d like to be.

But these little words may be much more important than that. A few linguists now think that far from being detritus, they may be crucial traffic signals to regulate the flow of conversation as well as tools to negotiate mutual understanding. That puts them at the heart of language itself — and they may be the hardest part of language for artificial intelligence to master.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>language speaking interjections linguistics communication feedback</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:716b26218b49/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:speaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:interjections"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:feedback"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://sashalaundy.com/writing/technical-skills/">
    <title>&quot;Technical&quot; skills</title>
    <dc:date>2025-01-15T05:59:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://sashalaundy.com/writing/technical-skills/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>But if "technical skills" are the skills we use to produce our work (good software) then by extension, every field has "technical" skills.

They're simply the skills used to produce the work.

Do you know how to frame the story of your product so it resonates, how to figure out what customers want, where and how to put something in a customer's path, and how to tell if it worked? Marketers do.

Do you know how to tell if someone is a good prospect, which people to call first, and what words to use when they're giving you the runaround? Sales people do.</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Noticing new skills is a key component of a growth mindset and a prerequisite to learning.

You won't unwittingly reinforce unpleasant power dynamics

We often dismiss skills that are not societally valued by pretending they are not skills. Or, sure, maybe they're skills, but they're mysterious and ineffable!

You reinforce this idea each time you say "soft skills" instead of working to enumerate them. Perhaps you mean "interpersonal skills," "leadership skills," or "communication skills." These are all technical skills, and they all have names.
</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>language skills technical learning tech communication</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:953b5ab715ce/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:skills"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:technical"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:tech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonviolent_Communication">
    <title>Nonviolent Communication - Wikipedia</title>
    <dc:date>2025-01-03T20:51:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonviolent_Communication</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The development of NVC is highly reliant on concepts developed by Carl Rogers and person-centered therapy. Rogers emphasized: 1) experiential learning, 2) "frankness about one's emotional state," 3) the satisfaction of hearing others "in a way that resonates for them," 4) the enriching and encouraging experience of "creative, active, sensitive, accurate, empathic listening," 5) the "deep value of congruence between one's own inner experience, one's conscious awareness, and one's communication," and, subsequently, 6) the enlivening experience of unconditionally receiving love or appreciation and extending the same. These influenced the concepts described in the section below.</blockquote>
<blockquote>
There are four components to practice nonviolent communication, and in this order:

Observation: These are facts (what we are seeing, hearing, or touching) as distinct from our evaluation of meaning and significance. NVC discourages static generalizations. It is said that "When we combine observation with evaluation, others are apt to hear criticism and resist what we are saying." Instead, a focus on observations specific to time and context is recommended.[1]: ch.3 
Feelings: These are emotions or sensations, free of thought and story. These are to be distinguished from thoughts (e.g., "I feel I didn't get a fair deal") and from words colloquially used as feelings but which convey what we think we are (e.g., "inadequate"), how we think others are evaluating us (e.g., "unimportant"), or what we think others are doing to us (e.g., "misunderstood", "ignored"). Feelings are said to reflect whether we are experiencing our needs as met or unmet. Identifying feelings is said to allow us to more easily connect with one another, and "Allowing ourselves to be vulnerable by expressing our feelings can help resolve conflicts."[1]: ch.4 
Needs: These are universal human needs, as distinct from particular strategies for meeting needs. It is posited that "Everything we do is in service of our needs."[14] Marshall Rosenberg refers to Max-Neef's model where needs may be categorised into 9 classes: sustenance, safety, love, understanding/empathy, creativity, recreation, sense of belonging, autonomy and meaning.[15] For more information, the Center for Nonviolent Communication has developed a needs inventory.[16]
Requests: Requests are distinguished from demands in that one is open to hearing a response of "no" without this triggering an attempt to force the matter. If one makes a request and receives a "no" it is not recommended that one gives up, but that one empathizes with what is preventing the other person from saying "yes," before deciding how to continue the conversation. It is recommended that requests use clear, positive, concrete action language.
</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>relationships communication coaching psychology business conflict cooperation language</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:9070371e6da1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:relationships"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:coaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:conflict"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:cooperation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:language"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/">
    <title>Populism, Media Revolutions, and Our Terrible Moment - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2024-11-23T18:37:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[On the ways in which media revolutions are often followed by populist movements. Talks about radio, printing press, and the decentralized internet.]]></description>
<dc:subject>youtube videos politics communication radio</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:a488bbd15a85/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:youtube"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:videos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:radio"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://people.math.harvard.edu/~ctm/home/text/others/shannon/entropy/entropy.pdf">
    <title>A Mathematical Theory of Communication - Claude Shannon</title>
    <dc:date>2024-11-21T19:44:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://people.math.harvard.edu/~ctm/home/text/others/shannon/entropy/entropy.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>THE recent development of various methods of modulation such as PCM and PPM which exchange
bandwidth for signal-to-noise ratio has intensified the interest in a general theory of communication. A
basis for such a theory is contained in the important papers of Nyquist1 and Hartley2 on this subject. In the
present paper we will extend the theory to include a number of new factors, in particular the effect of noise
in the channel, and the savings possible due to the statistical structure of the original message and due to the
nature of the final destination of the information.
The fundamental problem of communication is that of reproducing at one point either exactly or approximately a message selected at another point. Frequently the messages have meaning; that is they refer
to or are correlated according to some system with certain physical or conceptual entities. These semantic
aspects of communication are irrelevant to the engineering problem. The significant aspect is that the actual
message is one selected from a set of possible messages. The system must be designed to operate for each
possible selection, not just the one which will actually be chosen since this is unknown at the time of design</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>information theory communication papers</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:0c59a910eacb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:information"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:papers"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://surfingcomplexity.blog/2021/08/21/the-local-nature-of-culture/">
    <title>The local nature of culture – Surfing Complexity</title>
    <dc:date>2024-10-23T03:14:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://surfingcomplexity.blog/2021/08/21/the-local-nature-of-culture/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Turn the Ship Around!, a book by David Marquet about his experiences as commander of a nuclear submarine, the USS Santa Fe, and how he worked to improve its operational performance.

One of the changes that Marquet introduced is something he calls “thinking out loud”, where he encourages crew members to speak aloud their thoughts about things like intentions, expectations, and concerns. He notes that this approach contradicted naval best practices:

As naval officers, we stress formal communications and even have a book, the Interior Communications Manual, that specifies exactly how equipment, watch stations, and evolutions are spoken, written, and abbreviated …

This adherence to formal communications unfortunately crowds out the less formal but highly important contextual information needed for peak team performance. Words like “I think…” or “I am assuming…” or “It is likely…” that are not specific and concise orders get written up by inspection teams as examples of informal communications, a big no-no. But that is just the communication we need to make leader-leader work.

Turn the Ship Around! p103</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>culture leadership communication behavior patterns navy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:c21d72f4cea0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:leadership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:behavior"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:patterns"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:navy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://medium.com/@ElizAyer/dont-ask-forgiveness-radiate-intent-d36fd22393a3">
    <title>Don’t ask forgiveness, radiate intent | by Elizabeth Ayer | Medium</title>
    <dc:date>2024-10-23T03:07:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://medium.com/@ElizAyer/dont-ask-forgiveness-radiate-intent-d36fd22393a3</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I intend to use the shit out of this technique.
<blockquote>For me, the idea came from L. David Marquet who suggests using “I intend to…” to your superiors. The idea is that if the subordinate reliably signals intent, it removes the supervisor’s inclination to micromanage, while still allowing them to intervene if really necessary.

This phrase doesn’t need to be restricted to the leaders and subordinates, obviously. Radiating intent is also powerful throughout an organization.

Here are 4 reasons that radiating intent is better than begging forgiveness:

Radiating intent gives a chance for someone to stop you before you do a thing, in case it’s truly harmful
Radiating intent gives people who have information, or want to help, an opening to participate
Radiating intent leaves better evidence of your good will
Radiating intent shows others that adventurous behavior is acceptable in the org.
Radiating intent also has the advantage over asking permission that the “radiator” keeps responsibility if things go sour. It doesn’t transfer the blame the way seeking permission does, which is good. We should be responsible for our choices.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>communication intent tips behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:2ff3ec1201e3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:intent"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:tips"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:behavior"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.wired.com/story/meredith-whittaker-signal/">
    <title>Signal Is More Than Encrypted Messaging. Under Meredith Whittaker, It’s Out to Prove Surveillance Capitalism Wrong | WIRED</title>
    <dc:date>2024-09-02T23:24:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.wired.com/story/meredith-whittaker-signal/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Over its past decade, no leader of Signal has embodied that iconoclasm as visibly as Meredith Whittaker. Signal’s president since 2022 is one of the world’s most prominent tech critics: When she worked at Google, she led walkouts to protest its discriminatory practices and spoke out against its military contracts. She cofounded the AI Now Institute to address ethical implications of artificial intelligence and has become a leading voice for the notion that AI and surveillance are inherently intertwined. Since she took on the presidency at the Signal Foundation, she has come to see her central task as working to find a long-term taproot of funding to keep Signal alive for decades to come—with zero compromises or corporate entanglements—so it can serve as a model for an entirely new kind of tech ecosystem.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>business privacy tech productmanagement communication signal</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:eb4f47c48445/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:tech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:signal"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://thepointmag.com/examined-life/who-wants-to-play-the-status-game-agnes-callard/">
    <title>Who Wants to Play the Status Game? | The Point Magazine</title>
    <dc:date>2024-05-23T20:19:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://thepointmag.com/examined-life/who-wants-to-play-the-status-game-agnes-callard/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>A player of the Importance Game tries to ascend high enough to reach for something that will set her above her interlocutor, a player of the Leveling Game reaches down low enough to hit common ground. The former needs to signal enough power to establish a hierarchy; the latter enough powerlessness to establish equality.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>communication culture status games social</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:47075691f9df/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:status"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:games"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:social"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.anildash.com/2024/03/10/make-better-documents/">
    <title>Make better documents. - Anil Dash</title>
    <dc:date>2024-03-17T23:19:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.anildash.com/2024/03/10/make-better-documents/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Whether it's resumes or reports, budgets or broadsides, I'm pretty regularly sent working documents from a wide range of people, and over the years I've noticed some consistent patterns that lead those documents to be less effective than they should be. Even very smart, capable communicators routinely send important documents that distract from, or even undermine, their goals.

This isn't too surprising; we almost never actually teach people how to use the ordinary tools of business communication in more effective ways. So, I'm gathering some advice that I regularly share with people, in hopes that this helps you get your messages across more effectively. All of this is advice that should apply regardless of whether you're using tools like Google Docs (uh... Workspace?), Microsoft Office (or 365 or something?) or whatever else</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>communication documents writing tips</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:7ff95dacb551/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:documents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:tips"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://davidflowerstherapy.com/my-marriageended-over-dishes/">
    <title>My Marriage…Ended Over Dishes | David Flowers Therapy</title>
    <dc:date>2024-02-13T05:10:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://davidflowerstherapy.com/my-marriageended-over-dishes/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>partners fail to respond to each others’ bids for connection.

A bid for connection is anytime you need something from your partner, from small things like taking something out of the oven, to big things like taking a week off work to sit next to your partner in the hospital before and after they have surgery.

Gottman has noted in his research that couples who are doing well together respond positively to each others’ bids for connection 87% of the time, whereas couples who are struggling respond positively only 36% of the time.

In relationships that are struggling, at least one if not both partners often don’t notice and/or don’t respond positively when the other has a need.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>relationships marriage communication listening</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:c258b408feca/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:relationships"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:marriage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:listening"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://twitter.com/shreyas/status/1745961777257656628?t=tLc3HuP5hXt1qG0BKSknyQ&amp;s=19">
    <title>Shreyas Doshi on X: &quot;As a senior executive, you care a lot about your teams moving fast. So when a team misses its committed launch date, you show great displeasure. You demand more accountability. You make an example out of this team. Other teams see thi</title>
    <dc:date>2024-01-13T05:34:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://twitter.com/shreyas/status/1745961777257656628?t=tLc3HuP5hXt1qG0BKSknyQ&amp;s=19</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
As a senior executive, you care a lot about your teams moving fast.

So when a team misses its committed launch date, you show great displeasure.

You demand more accountability.

You make an example out of this team.

Other teams see this.
They are not stupid.
So they learn.

And from now on, every single team hits their committed launch dates.

You are very happy.
I can see it.

But my friend, I am so sorry to tell you:

You are no longer moving as fast as you were before.

Plus, what you ship will no longer be as high quality as before.

And over time you start to see this too.
You are not stupid.

Even though everyone is hitting their launch dates, something has changed.

Things seem to be moving slower than before.

And you have no idea why.

So you call meetings.

You set up check-ins.

You set up processes.

But despite all your efforts, nothing changes.

That gnawing feeling that you are no longer moving fast persists.

That embarrassment of seeing your teams ship a shoddy experience is all too common now.

And you have no idea why.

The answer is right there.

You are no longer moving fast because of YOUR communication.

Instead of creating a culture where teams have intrinsic motivation to move fast — because they are energetic and they care — you started punishing the odd case where a team misses its aggressive target date.

And so, by doing that you sent a message to everyone: Don't be very ambitious, because the reward for ambition is punishment.

I know that isn't the message you wanted to send.

But by doing what you did, it is the only message you will send. 100 times out of 100.

What could you have done instead?

When that team missed its launch date, you could have sent a positive message instead of punishing the team's leaders.

You could have used this opportunity to build & maintain a culture of aggression and ambition.

You could have said: 

"I understand why you missed the launch date. 

I'd rather that you stay aggressive and sometimes miss the date than being conservative and always hitting the date. 

I don't want you to stop being aggressive by default. 

And we want more teams to be like you."

At this point, you are either seeing the value of this approach or you are trying to find reasons to reject it.

And your reasons are quite flimsy, such as: "But what about launches that have an external commitment?"

You are smart. You can figure that one out.

But okay, let me spell it out for you:

1. Most launch dates should not be committed externally. So don't commit dates for most launches.

2. A few launches need external commitments (to customers, or regulators, or partners...)

 3. For the launches in # 2, sure, commit a conservative launch date that you are almost certain to hit.

4. But even for those, ask the team to devise an aggressive internal target date. It's okay if they slip this date. But it's important to have that aggressive internal target.

Why? Because remember Parkinson's Law:

Work expands to fill the time allotted for its completion.

Have you ever noticed how teams always struggle to hit their launch date, no matter how conservatively they've set them?

Yes, that's because of Parkinson's Law.

Look, I know it's easy to have dogma around "always hitting dates".

Dates are an easy, but incorrect proxy for your teams' velocity, ambition, and energy.

Though if you still want to maintain your fascination with hitting all dates, I am not sure I can (or even want to at this point) convince you otherwise.

But then I also guarantee that you will spend your entire career managing teams that move slower than they really can and/or ship lower quality products than they really can, and you will spend your entire career setting up check-ins, processes, spreadsheets, and carrots/sticks trying & failing to solve a problem that you created in the first place.

Best of luck to you!</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>productmanagement shreyas dates shipping communication leadership</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:08ec8d1e1b6f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:shreyas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:dates"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:shipping"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:leadership"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.theguardian.com/books/2021/oct/18/the-big-idea-is-it-your-personality-or-a-disorder">
    <title>The big idea: Is it your personality, or a disorder? | Books | The Guardian</title>
    <dc:date>2023-12-16T06:37:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.theguardian.com/books/2021/oct/18/the-big-idea-is-it-your-personality-or-a-disorder</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Something can be difficult without being diagnosed; pain is no less valid if it doesn’t have a medical-sounding name; and people going through an undefinable difficult time still deserve your help. Arguably, if we resist the terminology and opt for the long-form description of the problem instead, we might actually be able to understand each other better.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>psychology communication language diagnosis labels mentalhealth health</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:fa8539f06872/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:diagnosis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:labels"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:mentalhealth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:health"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.amazon.com/Crucial-Conversations-Tools-Talking-Stakes/dp/1260474186">
    <title>Crucial Conversations: Tools for Talking When Stakes are High, Third Edition: Grenny, Joseph, Patterson, Kerry, McMillan, Ron, Switzler, Al, Gregory, Emily: 9781260474183: Amazon.com: Books</title>
    <dc:date>2023-09-16T20:33:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.amazon.com/Crucial-Conversations-Tools-Talking-Stakes/dp/1260474186</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Crucial Conversations provides powerful skills to ensure every conversation―especially difficult ones―leads to the results you want. Written in an engaging and witty style, it teaches readers how to be persuasive rather than abrasive, how to get back to productive dialogue when others blow up or clam up, and it offers powerful skills for mastering high-stakes conversations, regardless of the topic or person.

This new edition addresses issues that have arisen in recent years. You’ll learn how to:

Respond when someone initiates aCrucial Conversationwith you
Identify and address the lag time between identifying a problem and discussing it
Communicate more effectively across digital mediums
When stakes are high, opinions vary, and emotions run strong, you have three choices: Avoid a crucial conversation and suffer the consequences; handle the conversation poorly and suffer the consequences; or apply the lessons and strategies of Crucial Conversations and improve relationships and results.
Whether they take place at work or at home, with your coworkers or your spouse, Crucial Conversations have a profound impact on your career, your happiness, and your future. With the skills you learn in this book, you'll never have to worry about the outcome of a Crucial Conversation again.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>productmanagement books communication conversations skills</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:a8f9b4ab805a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:conversations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:skills"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://twitter.com/ptr/status/1680986007976673280?s=61&amp;t=sJCHxbNq0rD0zrmLXvtcXQ">
    <title>Paul Rosania on Twitter: &quot;You can be the smartest person in the room, and if you're a subpar listener you will be a terrible PM. Conversely, if you're amazing at listening – and *remembering* – you're likely to have a strong product career. Here's why</title>
    <dc:date>2023-07-20T04:54:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://twitter.com/ptr/status/1680986007976673280?s=61&amp;t=sJCHxbNq0rD0zrmLXvtcXQ</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>when you defend a decision in an exec meeting, the main signal you send is, "I'm not listening."

Picture the job of the CEO. On either side of the product review meeting, they might be interviewing a leadership candidate, reviewing a deal for office space, doing a press interview, or talking to a prospective investor. There is a crazy amount of context switching (and stress!). When a PM shows up defensive in a review, it puts busy leaders into a panic. They can seem angry, but they're actually fearful: they worry you won't register and address their concerns. And they need to context switch and do something else, and a week (or more!) will pass before their next chance to talk to you.

Acknowledge and accept!

Here's the trick: when you're met with criticism or feedback, instead of explaining why, just say "got it." Then, ask questions.

This doesn't mean taking blame or accepting bad feedback. What you are doing is establishing a crucial baseline: "I hear what you are saying."

Clarify.

We all feel defensive when we receive feedback in high pressure situations. Channel your defensive energy toward questions that will clarify things for you and your team, and improve your alignment with the stakeholder. Things like:
* "Last time, you mentioned the importance of X. Does that still rank for you? Did we over-focus on it?"
* "When we did X, our concern was Y. Should we be worried about that?" (And if so, "Is there a better way to mitigate it?")
* "We've been really pushing to ship by X, we considered Y but the team thinks it is going to be expensive – is it worth slipping the date if necessary to get it in?" (This one can be a particular , sometimes stakeholders just want to hear it's on your radar and you won't forget, and aren't going to block your launch if they know you are listening!)</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>productmanagement execs communication</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:c7529ed1daed/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:execs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://ncase.me/trust/">
    <title>The Evolution of Trust</title>
    <dc:date>2023-01-13T18:28:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://ncase.me/trust/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Game theory has shown us the three things we need for the evolution of trust:1. REPEAT INTERACTIONSTrust keeps a relationship going, but you need the knowledge of possible future repeat interactions before trust can evolve.2. POSSIBLE WIN-WINSYou must be playing a non-zero-sum game, a game where it's at least possible that both players can be better off -- a win-win.3. LOW MISCOMMUNICATIONIf the level of miscommunication is too high, trust breaks down. But when there's a little bit of miscommunication, it pays to be more forgiving.Of course, real-world trust is affected by much more than this. There's reputation, shared values, contracts, cultural markers, blah blah blah.</blockquote>
If there's one big takeaway
from all of game theory, it's this:

What the game is, defines what the players do.
Our problem today isn't just that people are losing trust,
it's that our environment acts against the evolution of trust.

That may seem cynical or naive -- that we're "merely" products of our environment -- but as game theory reminds us, we are each others' environment. In the short run, the game defines the players. But in the long run, it's us players who define the game.

So, do what you can do, to create the conditions necessary to evolve trust. Build relationships. Find win-wins. Communicate clearly. Maybe then, we can stop firing at each other, get out of our own trenches, cross No Man's Land to come together...]]></description>
<dc:subject>games gametheory trust behavior cooperation communication</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:211f39ae19cb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:games"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:gametheory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:trust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:behavior"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:cooperation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/no-one-knows-your-strategy-not-even-your-top-leaders/">
    <title>No One Knows Your Strategy — Not Even Your Top Leaders</title>
    <dc:date>2022-10-14T18:15:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/no-one-knows-your-strategy-not-even-your-top-leaders/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Rather than hosting another town hall, top executives should focus first on their direct reports, making sure they understand the company’s overall strategy and how their function, geography, or business unit fits into the bigger picture. One powerful way to do this: Each top executive should consistently explain why his or her unit’s objectives matter for the team and for the company as a whole.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>strategy business communication consistency</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:c94fcc99f826/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:consistency"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/05/oral-culture-literate-culture-twitter-culture/239697/">
    <title>Oral Culture, Literate Culture, Twitter Culture - The Atlantic</title>
    <dc:date>2022-04-22T21:40:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/05/oral-culture-literate-culture-twitter-culture/239697/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Keller is actually trying to complain about the reemergence of oral psychodynamics in the public sphere rather than about memory falling out of favor. If the latter were the case, his ire would be more about Google; instead, most of his frustration is directed against social media, and mostly Twitter, the most conversational, and thus most oral of these mediums.

Western cultures are thoroughly dominated by literate thinking, but retain some pieces of their orality. What we're seeing in social media, though, is a reemergence *into the public sphere* of many of the oral dynamics that previously functioned outside the broadcast- and newspaper-dominated media world of the 20th century. And that's where Tufekci makes a key observation about the old guard's problems with social media, and why the digerati are so loathe to take their issues seriously.

What we are seeing with social media is the public sphere, hitherto dominated by written culture, has been more opened up to oral psychodynamics. And this is particularly difficult to deal with for intellectuals who rely on their competence with, and dominance of, the written form as hallmark of their place in society."]]></description>
<dc:subject>twitter communication culture literacy oral written</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:4f199cbd1b70/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:literacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:oral"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:written"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://qaspire.com/2022/01/10/conversations-that-build-psychological-safety/">
    <title>Conversations That Build Psychological Safety | QAspire</title>
    <dc:date>2022-03-11T02:14:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://qaspire.com/2022/01/10/conversations-that-build-psychological-safety/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Growth in today’s world is driven by how talented people bring their best ideas on the table, work with each other in a conducive environment and choose to deliver their best effort in order to achieve the desired outcome. Companies often do great at recruiting the most talented people but fail at providing them a […]</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>management leadership safety trust tanmay_vora amy_edmondson communication via:mreinbold teams</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:8c0ff6863d6a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:management"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:leadership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:safety"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:trust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:tanmay_vora"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:amy_edmondson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:via:mreinbold"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:teams"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://nohello.net">
    <title>no hello</title>
    <dc:date>2022-03-10T00:57:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://nohello.net</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[public equiv of go/nohello]]></description>
<dc:subject>chat communication etiquette</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:3a90c41ad289/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:chat"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:etiquette"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.npr.org/2021/08/09/1026185212/letter-writing-hallmark-personal-tips">
    <title>Letter Writing 101: Tips From A Hallmark Card Writer : Life Kit : NPR</title>
    <dc:date>2022-02-15T03:43:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.npr.org/2021/08/09/1026185212/letter-writing-hallmark-personal-tips</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[""]]></description>
<dc:subject>writing letters letter communication tips</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:bfc67bff2ee9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:letters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:letter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:tips"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://medium.com/@johnpcutler/great-one-pagers-592ebbaf80ec">
    <title>Great One-Pagers. Tips for writing great one-pagers | by John Cutler | Medium</title>
    <dc:date>2021-12-05T21:21:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://medium.com/@johnpcutler/great-one-pagers-592ebbaf80ec</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[""]]></description>
<dc:subject>productmanagement documentation communication</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:7647892ff443/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:documentation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.cindyalvarez.com/ask-cindy-what-is-the-best-way-to-help-others-understand-what-research-is-learning-and-why-its-taking-so-long/">
    <title>Ask Cindy: What is the best way to help others understand what research is learning and why it’s taking so long? - Cindy Alvarez | Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2021-08-03T17:38:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.cindyalvarez.com/ask-cindy-what-is-the-best-way-to-help-others-understand-what-research-is-learning-and-why-its-taking-so-long/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Here’s a thing that took me years to understand: when people complain that something “is taking too long”, it’s not about the time. 

It’s not about reducing the hours or days or weeks.

It’s about these three feelings:

I’m not sure this is valuable enough
I’m not sure when it’s going to be done
I’m not seeing tangible evidence of progress]]></description>
<dc:subject>productmanagement communication process time</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:939212b9b2df/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:process"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:time"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://a9.io/glue-comic/">
    <title>Chapter 1 | Chatting with Glue</title>
    <dc:date>2021-07-28T02:15:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://a9.io/glue-comic/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[""]]></description>
<dc:subject>conversation communication knowledge chat</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:f80c5808c1dd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:chat"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://joshkaufman.net/how-to-ask-useful-questions/">
    <title>How to Ask Useful Questions – Josh Kaufman</title>
    <dc:date>2021-06-08T00:35:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://joshkaufman.net/how-to-ask-useful-questions/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Asking for Information
"I'm interested in more information about A, and I found you via B. Are you the best person to ask about this?"

Asking for Agreement
"Based on our previous conversation about X, we decided Y is the best solution. The next step is Z. Agreed? If so, I'll get started right away."]]></description>
<dc:subject>communication questions advice agreement</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:6b479e8fadd2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:questions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:advice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:agreement"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://medium.com/lessons-from-mckinsey/the-pyramid-principle-f0885dd3c5c7">
    <title>ype html&gt;The Pyramid Principle | by Ameet Ranadive | Lessons from McKinsey | Medium</title>
    <dc:date>2021-06-07T22:11:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://medium.com/lessons-from-mckinsey/the-pyramid-principle-f0885dd3c5c7</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The key take-aways from the Pyramid Principle at McKinsey were:
Start with the answer first.
Group and summarize your supporting arguments.
Logically order your supporting ideas.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>writing communication productmanagement framework</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:1dd7e2e44589/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:productmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:framework"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://hbr.org/2016/11/how-to-write-email-with-military-precision">
    <title>How to Write Email with Military Precision</title>
    <dc:date>2020-07-17T01:06:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://hbr.org/2016/11/how-to-write-email-with-military-precision</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[and BLUF - bottom line up front (TL;DR but militaristic)
"ACTION – Compulsory for the recipient to take some action
SIGN – Requires the signature of the recipient
INFO – For informational purposes only, and there is no response or action required
DECISION – Requires a decision by the recipient
REQUEST – Seeks permission or approval by the recipient
COORD – Coordination by or with the recipient is needed"]]></description>
<dc:subject>communication email business</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:625b07c888cc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:email"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:business"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://theconcourse.deadspin.com/how-wile-e-coyote-explains-the-world-1752248034">
    <title>How Wile E. Coyote Explains The World</title>
    <dc:date>2020-04-30T01:52:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://theconcourse.deadspin.com/how-wile-e-coyote-explains-the-world-1752248034</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The crows seemed to be calling his name, thought Caw.

"As a figure of speech, this is a paraprosdokian, a literary device in which a surprise in the second part of a sentence alters your understanding of the meaning of the first part. It’s a popular device in comedy, and deservedly so. Done well—as in the famous “I want to die in my sleep peacefully like my grandfather, not screaming in terror like his passengers,” attributed in various forms to Will Rogers, Bob Monkhouse, and Handey himself—it produces a slightly delayed and wonderful mixture of dismay and mirth, the groaning laugh (or laughing groan) unique to the form. Few comedians ever have matched Handey’s facility for elegant paraprosdokian construction, or his ability to enrich the structural surprise with a sublimely silly image, like the idea of a man named Caw."

Here is a parable. For decades, a master artisan crafts works of beauty and genius. His creations are acclaimed by virtually all who behold them. Nearing the end of his life, the artisan, wealthy and revered, his name rightly and indelibly etched into the history of his medium, sets out to describe for posterity how he created such great works, the discipline underlying their brilliance. He writes down the rules he set for himself. And they are wrong. They completely miss the point of his own work. His system of understanding fails to encapsulate a reality he himself created. By the time anybody points it out, he’s been dead for years.

The game is rigged. It was rigged from the start. You, yourself, are part of the rigging; your nature produces your failure, and your failure produces the conditions that prompt your next doomed try. What are you trying to do? At what are you failing?

You are trying, like Wile E. Coyote, like Chuck Jones, like me, to make some sense of the world. You are forming a notion; an idea of the rules. That notion only ever can be incomplete; your mind is a baffling supercomputer nevertheless hopelessly inadequate to the task of understanding the full terrible complexity of the world around you. That notion will be blown apart (or dropped off a ledge, or run over by a bus), and you will recognize that it has been, that it was fatally incomplete to begin with—and that recognition will be the first tenet of the new notion, the seed of the next failure. On and on you will go, making sense of the world, forming notions of order, and being surprised in ways large and small by their failure, forever.

Can you stop? My friend, trying to stop forming notions of order is forming another notion of order. Forming notions of order is what you are: Intellectus inadaequtus. There is no escaping. Your mind is the setup; reality is the punchline; your life is the joke. And like all others, it has rules. It isn’t chaos. It is order. It is the order.

What can you do? All anybody can do; the same thing you’ve always done; what you did when Wile E. Coyote pushed down on that detonator and blew himself up. You can laugh at it. It’s pretty funny.]]></description>
<dc:subject>jokes communication culture humor</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:5d8fec27edd1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:jokes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:humor"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://twittercommunity.com/t/changes-to-access-token-and-secret-management/130851">
    <title>Changes to access token and secret management - Announcements - Twitter Developers</title>
    <dc:date>2020-01-24T17:47:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://twittercommunity.com/t/changes-to-access-token-and-secret-management/130851</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Over the coming months, we will be making changes to the way that Access Tokens and Access Token Secrets are presented and managed within the applications Dashboard on developer.twitter.com 199

As a reminder - when you create (register) an app on developer.twitter.com 102, an individual and unique application identity is generated, represented by a private Consumer Key and Consumer Secret pair that is used as part of the OAuth flow.

It is also possible to generate an Access Token and Access Token Secret inside the Dashboard, which is associated with your app. These two additional private items are used to identify and authenticate your personal developer account to the application, without needing to go through the full Sign-in with Twitter flow. Remember that if you need to authenticate other users to your application, you will need to implement the Sign-in with Twitter process in order to receive Access Tokens and Access Token Secrets so that your application can act on behalf of those additional user accounts.

In order to make API integrations more secure, we will no longer show the Access Token and Access Token Secret on the Dashboard beyond the first time that these values are generated, effective January 21, 2020."]]></description>
<dc:subject>twitter apis secrets keys change security communication example reference</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:6bc7fe50309b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:apis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:secrets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:keys"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:security"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:example"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:reference"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/09/people-speak-faster-less-efficient-languages/597391/">
    <title>People Speak Faster in Less Efficient Languages - The Atlantic</title>
    <dc:date>2019-09-08T06:36:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/09/people-speak-faster-less-efficient-languages/597391/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[In other words, no matter how quickly speakers chatter, the rate of information they’re transmitting is roughly the same across languages.]]></description>
<dc:subject>language information communication efficiency speed bits bandwidth spoken</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:9e78ccefe99c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:information"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:efficiency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:speed"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:bits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:bandwidth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:spoken"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://voiceandtone.com/failure-message/">
    <title>Failure Message | Voice and Tone</title>
    <dc:date>2017-08-09T21:09:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://voiceandtone.com/failure-message/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[""]]></description>
<dc:subject>voice tone writing communication design guidelines tips tricks</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:c4e8be748992/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:voice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:tone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:guidelines"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:tips"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:tricks"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/02/22/oracle_crushes_apiary_customer_hopes/">
    <title>Oracle crushes Apiary's hope in slightly awkward email to customers • The Register</title>
    <dc:date>2017-02-22T21:32:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/02/22/oracle_crushes_apiary_customer_hopes/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[In a 22 February email to customers, seen by The Reg, Apiary's founder and chief executive Jakub Nesetril and senior vice president of integration cloud Amit Zavery stressed the value of their customers and the benefits of their product plans with mighty Oracle behind it.

"Apiary's success is owned by our customers, and my top priority is to ensure a seamless experience for you," they wrote.

"Joining Oracle gives us the potential to significantly boost the value Apiary delivers by accelerating our product development roadmap and expanding the resources available to our customers."

Oracle, however, quickly squashed the charm offensive.

In a bluntly worded addendum to their piece, Oracle pulled no punches saying it is reviewing Apiary's roadmap and that they ultimately call the shots.

Oracle also told customers to ignore Nesetril and Zavery.

"All product roadmap information, whether communicated by Apiary or by Oracle, does not represent a commitment to deliver any material, code, or functionality, and should not be relied upon in making purchasing decisions," Oracle wrote.

Oracle is reviewing the Apiary roadmap and will provide guidance "in accordance with Oracle's standard product communication policies".

"Any resulting features and timing of release of such features as determined by Oracle's review of Apiary's product roadmap are at the sole discretion of Oracle."

Oracle announced its plans to buy enterprise API specialist Apiary, founded in 2011, in January.]]></description>
<dc:subject>oracle apiary acquisition messaging communication roadmap</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:441595d296e5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:oracle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:apiary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:acquisition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:messaging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:roadmap"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.cepro.com/article/new_sonos_api_disrupts_home_automation_integration_but_lays_solid_foundatio">
    <title>New Sonos API Disrupts Home Automation Integration, But Lays Solid Foundation - CE Pro</title>
    <dc:date>2017-01-26T17:00:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.cepro.com/article/new_sonos_api_disrupts_home_automation_integration_but_lays_solid_foundatio</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><dc:subject>apis partners Sonos changes change communication deprecation</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:bd4e3b34b965/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:apis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:partners"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:Sonos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:changes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:deprecation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://resonate.duarte.com/#!page0">
    <title>Resonate</title>
    <dc:date>2015-03-07T00:46:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://resonate.duarte.com/#!page0</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[""]]></description>
<dc:subject>presentations communication duarte narrative stories</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:de73703d4cd3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:presentations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:duarte"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:narrative"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:stories"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.eff.org/secure-messaging-scorecard">
    <title>Secure Messaging Scorecard | Electronic Frontier Foundation</title>
    <dc:date>2014-11-06T20:23:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.eff.org/secure-messaging-scorecard</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><dc:subject>security chat eff messaging privacy communication</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:7d06b0652b7b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:security"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:chat"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:eff"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:messaging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://zachholman.com/talk/move-fast-break-nothing/">
    <title>Move Fast and Break Nothing</title>
    <dc:date>2014-10-09T06:05:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://zachholman.com/talk/move-fast-break-nothing/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[excellent stuff, via Ed]]></description>
<dc:subject>testing process github communication teaching culture debugging</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:c366c99ae6ae/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:testing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:process"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:github"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:debugging"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.sqwiggle.com/">
    <title>https://www.sqwiggle.com/</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-29T03:42:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.sqwiggle.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[a persistant video chat room, but instead of having a live video feed on all the time like you might do with Skype or Google Hangouts, Sqwiggle takes a picture of you every 8 seconds. It’s a great way to see everyone at their workspace while they are working. And whenever you do want to chat with a person you can just click a button and you’ll have a live video chat up in less than a second.]]></description>
<dc:subject>collaboration remote video communication team tools</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:d78b95722240/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:remote"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:team"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:tools"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.cindyalvarez.com/communication/announcing-change-without-inducing-panic">
    <title>» Announcing Change without Inducing Panic</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-22T17:12:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.cindyalvarez.com/communication/announcing-change-without-inducing-panic</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["You need to communicate these 5 things within 10 seconds / 1 screen of text:
When the change is coming
How this affects you (or “This does not affect you unless X”)
What action you need to take (or “You do not need to do anything”)
Why this decision was made (can be high-level/’spun’)
You can complain here"]]></description>
<dc:subject>cindy_alvarez change changes communication migration messaging customers happiness</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:18326ea9a1c1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:cindy_alvarez"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:changes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:migration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:messaging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:customers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:happiness"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://grove.io/">
    <title>Grove.io - Hosted IRC and so much more</title>
    <dc:date>2011-11-21T19:16:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://grove.io/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[RT @shiflett: Hey designers, stop using Campfire and use real IRC. Source: http://twitter.com/]]></description>
<dc:subject>irc service chat communication tools</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:2db970388e54/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:irc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:service"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:chat"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:tools"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.cindyalvarez.com/communication/the-dos-and-donts-of-cold-emailing">
    <title>The Do’s and Don’ts of Cold-Emailing</title>
    <dc:date>2011-08-04T15:52:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.cindyalvarez.com/communication/the-dos-and-donts-of-cold-emailing</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><dc:subject>Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:518eaba1035d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:Communication"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://status.heroku.com/incident/151">
    <title>Widespread Application Outage</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-01T03:17:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://status.heroku.com/incident/151</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><dc:subject>Heroku aws Outage Communication Status Process</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:3ae29587da1c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:Heroku"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:aws"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:Outage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:Communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:Status"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:Process"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://aws.amazon.com/message/65648/">
    <title>Summary of the Amazon EC2 and Amazon RDS Service Disruption</title>
    <dc:date>2011-04-30T19:44:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://aws.amazon.com/message/65648/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><dc:subject>Aws Amazon Outage Postmortem Communication Cause</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:fb8bf8bc1984/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:Aws"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:Amazon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:Outage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:Postmortem"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:Communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:Cause"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2011/04/27location_qa.html">
    <title>Apple - Press Info - Apple Q&amp;A on Location Data</title>
    <dc:date>2011-04-28T18:59:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2011/04/27location_qa.html</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[RT @sramji: Apple on Location & iPhone  < one of the best pieces of corporate communication I've seen since Jobs  ...]]></description>
<dc:subject>security mobile privacy communication apple damage control</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://twitter.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:d00c02be71ca/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:security"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:mobile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:damage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:control"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://web.archive.org/web/20160201034303/http://www.blog.voximate.com/blog/article/508/software-product-road-maps/">
    <title>Most Software Product Road Maps Are Harmful Evil Lies!</title>
    <dc:date>2011-01-27T16:18:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://web.archive.org/web/20160201034303/http://www.blog.voximate.com/blog/article/508/software-product-road-maps/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["There may be no greater ongoing source of confusion, mis-set expectations, and outright deception than the ubiquitous software product road map. Are you tired of road map heartburn? Then take the Road Mapper’s Anonymous pledge and swear off bad habits forever"
orig URL: http://www.voximate.com/blog/article/508/software-product-road-maps/]]></description>
<dc:subject>management projectmanagement agile roadmap planning communication roadmaps</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:995f640d12cb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:management"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:projectmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:agile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:roadmap"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:planning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:roadmaps"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.rexblog.com/2010/12/17/22088">
    <title>Bookmark this, Yahoo! | Rex Hammock's RexBlog.com</title>
    <dc:date>2010-12-18T19:37:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.rexblog.com/2010/12/17/22088</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><dc:subject>Delicious Yahoo damage message interpretation interpret Communication</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:1c067b724fbb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:Delicious"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:Yahoo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:damage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:message"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:interpretation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:interpret"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:Communication"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://status.fogcreek.com/2010/05/all-services-up-previous-service-outage-postmortem.html">
    <title>Fog Creek Network Status: All Services Up; Previous Service Outage Postmortem</title>
    <dc:date>2010-05-04T17:47:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://status.fogcreek.com/2010/05/all-services-up-previous-service-outage-postmortem.html</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[nice blog post about downtime]]></description>
<dc:subject>outage downtime blog communication failure</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:9d1de66e96e6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:outage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:downtime"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:blog"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:failure"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.transparentuptime.com/2010/02/downtime-post-mortems-and-look-at.html">
    <title>Transparent Uptime: Downtime post-mortems, and a look at oneforty.com</title>
    <dc:date>2010-03-08T21:16:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.transparentuptime.com/2010/02/downtime-post-mortems-and-look-at.html</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A guideline for post-mortem communication Prerequisites Admit failure - Hiding downtime is no longer an option (thanks to Twitter) Sound like a human - Do not use a standard template, do not apologize for "inconveniencing" us. Have a communication channel - Ideally you've set up a process to handle incidents before the event, and communicated publicly during the event. Customers will need to know where to find your updates. Above all else, be authentic]]></description>
<dc:subject>advice communication uptime outage responsibility howto guidelines</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:964267bb4223/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:advice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:uptime"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:outage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:responsibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:howto"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:guidelines"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nilvsdcbs.com/guncontrol.html">
    <title>Nicholas Ivan Ladendorf 2010 US House candidate</title>
    <dc:date>2010-01-09T01:46:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nilvsdcbs.com/guncontrol.html</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[gun control comic, very well done]]></description>
<dc:subject>design politics site marketing policy communication</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:da0909c4c2d8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:site"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:marketing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.viperchill.com/important-blogging-analysis/">
    <title>The Most Important Blogging Analysis Ever</title>
    <dc:date>2009-11-15T19:46:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.viperchill.com/important-blogging-analysis/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Collection of blog advice. Most of this is well known, but this collects a lot into one place.]]></description>
<dc:subject>howto blogging strategy blogs advice writing marketing communication</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:93df9e3492ae/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:howto"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:blogs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:advice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:marketing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://billflagg.blogspot.com/2009/08/is-playfulness-good-for-business.html">
    <title>Bill Flagg: Is playfulness good for business?</title>
    <dc:date>2009-10-17T18:50:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://billflagg.blogspot.com/2009/08/is-playfulness-good-for-business.html</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[How being playful can improve response rates]]></description>
<dc:subject>marketing business playfulness communication response responsiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:ccb1061a8ad0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:marketing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:playfulness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:response"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:responsiveness"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tinychat.com/">
    <title>Tinychat - Free Chat Rooms &amp; audio video conferences</title>
    <dc:date>2009-09-20T20:00:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tinychat.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Lifehacker approved: live video, audio, and screen-sharing chatroom for up to 12 people at once]]></description>
<dc:subject>free video collaboration chat communication webapp online chatroom</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:6ec9da13d3d2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:free"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:chat"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:webapp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:chatroom"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://socialcast.com/">
    <title>Socialcast</title>
    <dc:date>2009-05-08T12:41:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://socialcast.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[private microblogging. "Socialcast is free for 10 users and $1 per month for each additional user Special rates for companies with 50+ users and non-profits"]]></description>
<dc:subject>microblogging intranet twitter networking collaboration business service socialsoftware communication sharing tool enterprise</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:600e0e2c9e34/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:microblogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:intranet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:networking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:service"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:socialsoftware"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:sharing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:tool"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:enterprise"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.alorachistiakoff.com/2009/04/14/qualities-of-a-great-speaker/">
    <title>Qualities of a Great Speaker | The Pragmatic Contextualist</title>
    <dc:date>2009-04-15T17:21:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.alorachistiakoff.com/2009/04/14/qualities-of-a-great-speaker/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Educational - A speaker should provide enough new information that members of the audience walk out of the room with a new insight, perspective or even simple fact that they did not have when the session began. Authentic - A speaker’s authenticity is their currency with an audience. If, for even a moment, a speaker appears or sounds inauthentic, their content — no matter how good — can lose credibility. Emotionally Connective - A speaker’s ability to emotionally connect with an audience — whether by being vulnerable, by making them laugh, or by motivating them into action — is what an audience will ultimately remember most. Human beings are emotionally-driven creatures, and a speaker who ignore that aspect of the human experience never be as compelling."]]></description>
<dc:subject>tips speaking presentations communication</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:4f6a40d10708/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:tips"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:speaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:presentations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.bakertweet.com/">
    <title>Baker Tweet</title>
    <dc:date>2009-04-01T14:49:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.bakertweet.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["It’s busy in a kitchen. It’s impossible to find the time to tell the world that the best hot rolls just came out of the oven of your bakery. Welcome BakerTweet. Spin the dial to “Hot Rolls” and press the button. A message goes out via twitter to tell the world of your delicious rolls."]]></description>
<dc:subject>hardware arduino bakery communication marketing twitter</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:f8bcc0e0aacf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:hardware"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:arduino"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:bakery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:marketing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:twitter"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/01/12/atomization.html">
    <title>PressThink: Audience Atomization Overcome:  Why the Internet Weakens the Authority of the Press</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-09T17:13:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/01/12/atomization.html</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In the age of mass media, the press was able to define the sphere of legitimate debate with relative ease because the people on the receiving end were atomized-- connected "up" to Big Media but not across to each other. And now that authority is eroding. I will try to explain why."]]></description>
<dc:subject>press consensus framing audience newspapers media internet communication news analysis journalism bias criticism culture</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:00c4ba0ed19d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:press"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:consensus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:framing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:audience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:newspapers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:news"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:analysis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:bias"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:culture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/truetelephone">
    <title>The True Story of the Telephone (Aaron Swartz's Raw Thought)</title>
    <dc:date>2009-02-03T18:28:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/truetelephone</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Bell’s biographers have gone to heroic lengths to explain away all the evidence. Refusing credit for the telephone just showed Bell’s humility; not being involved in the corporation showed his dedication to pure research. The fact that both patents were filed on the same day is a grand historic coincidence — or perhaps Gray stole the idea from Bell.  As a result, Gray is forgotten and Bell is remembered as one of history’s great inventors — not as he should be: a hobbyist and a fraud, forced by love into stealing one of the greatest inventions of all time."]]></description>
<dc:subject>bell gray patents telephone inventions invention story communication innovation history</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:172f1bf9b2b6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:bell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:gray"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:telephone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:inventions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:invention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:story"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:history"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2008/12/05/assymetrical-follow-a-core-web-20-pattern/">
    <title>James Governor’s Monkchips » Asymmetrical Follow: A Core Web 2.0 Pattern</title>
    <dc:date>2008-12-08T18:31:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2008/12/05/assymetrical-follow-a-core-web-20-pattern/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["a core pattern for Web 2.0, in which a social network user can have many people following them without a need for reciprocity. Assmmetric Follow is unlike email for example, which tends to be within small groups, with all users knowing each other (newsletters are a clear exception here)." the comments are just as interesting.]]></description>
<dc:subject>twitter web2.0 communication asymmetry patterns networking community socialnetworking</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:3c916f87ebdd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:web2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:asymmetry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:patterns"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:networking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:socialnetworking"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.infed.org/biblio/b-dialog.htm">
    <title>dialogue, conversation and education</title>
    <dc:date>2008-11-14T15:53:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.infed.org/biblio/b-dialog.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["onversation and dialogue are not simply the means that informal educators use, but are also  what educators should seek to cultivate in local life. They may be approached as relationships to enter rather than simply as methods."]]></description>
<dc:subject>dialogue education pedagogy conversation informal learning theory sociology communication reference lsi</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:97d7031aba25/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:dialogue"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:informal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:sociology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:reference"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:lsi"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://notify.me/">
    <title>notify.me</title>
    <dc:date>2008-11-13T19:06:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://notify.me/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[pass it an rss feed and it will IM/SMS/Email you when it updates]]></description>
<dc:subject>alerts rss sms mobile communication notification notify</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:d48b64c51da3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:alerts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:rss"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:sms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:mobile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:notification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:notify"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.uxmatters.com/MT/archives/000309.php">
    <title>Designing a Different Kind of Intranet: An Intranet for a UX Team :: UXmatters</title>
    <dc:date>2008-10-22T20:35:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.uxmatters.com/MT/archives/000309.php</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Most of us who are working as part of a design team in a services company, a product company, or even a design boutique have to live with a generic intranet. In this article, I’ll describe how to leverage your company’s intranet and how to build a community around an intranet for a UX team.]]></description>
<dc:subject>ux collaboration intranet communication</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:3c68735e526b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:intranet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://mkweb.bcgsc.ca/debates/?debate=mccain-obama-01#section-pos-count">
    <title>leixical analysis of the first obama mccain debate</title>
    <dc:date>2008-10-17T18:10:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://mkweb.bcgsc.ca/debates/?debate=mccain-obama-01#section-pos-count</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[with word clouds and everything]]></description>
<dc:subject>visualization words communication politics debate obama mccain</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:acaa8fd407d8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:visualization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:words"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:debate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:obama"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:mccain"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.fuzzmail.org/">
    <title>Fuzzmail</title>
    <dc:date>2008-09-26T16:57:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.fuzzmail.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[records the act of writing and lets you send it as an email. Dynamic changes, typoes, pauses and writeovers are captured and communicated. We created fuzzmail because we wanted a more emotionally expressive alternative to email, so that an emailed love letter does not have to look the same as a business letter.]]></description>
<dc:subject>email writing process communication</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:58d765ee9496/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:email"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:process"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://drop.io/fax">
    <title>Drop.io fax</title>
    <dc:date>2008-05-13T19:14:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://drop.io/fax</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[free in/out faxing]]></description>
<dc:subject>fax free business communication online service</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:2b653443de0d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:fax"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:free"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:service"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/05/health/05well.html?em&amp;ex=1202446800&amp;en=71c8f193a5fde0ee&amp;ei=5087%0A">
    <title>Toddler Behavior - Parenting - Communication - Kids - Tara Parker-Pope - New York Times</title>
    <dc:date>2008-02-07T16:00:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/05/health/05well.html?em&amp;ex=1202446800&amp;en=71c8f193a5fde0ee&amp;ei=5087%0A</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["[use] short phrases with lots of repetition, and reflecting the child’s emotions in your tone and facial expressions. And, most awkward, it means repeating the very words the child is using, over and over again."]]></description>
<dc:subject>parenting psychology toddlers interesting Children communication nytimes harveykarp</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:e12c95513541/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:parenting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:toddlers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:Children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:nytimes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:harveykarp"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2007/12/14/valuing_ineffic.html">
    <title>apophenia: valuing inefficiencies and unreliability</title>
    <dc:date>2007-12-17T17:17:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2007/12/14/valuing_ineffic.html</link>
    <dc:creator>earth2marsh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[While we want perfect reliability for our own needs, we also want there to be failures in the system so that we can blame technology when we don't want to admit to our own weaknesses.]]></description>
<dc:subject>social socialsoftware culture design psychology Community etiquette communication article attention</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/b:fb13db0033cd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:social"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:socialsoftware"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:Community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:etiquette"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:article"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:earth2marsh/t:attention"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>