<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (cshalizi)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from cshalizi</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/philosophy-of-science/article/science-without-trust/13A5FD15D5ADFF4C67DDC1DF8D8FEB6C?WT.mc_id=New%2520Cambridge%2520Alert%2520-%2520Issues"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.03948"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://journals.aps.org/pre/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevE.102.062419"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.wired.com/story/internet-made-dupes-cynics-of-us-all/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://medium.com/@kaistinchcombe/decentralized-and-trustless-crypto-paradise-is-actually-a-medieval-hellhole-c1ca122efdec"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aeon.co/magazine/technology/on-the-high-seas-of-the-hidden-internet/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://henryfarrell.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Silk_Road.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v516/n7529/full/nature13977.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.dailydot.com/crime/deep-web-boneless-optimuscrime-hackbb-credit-card-fraud/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11238-011-9287-y"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rajivsethi.blogspot.com/2012/02/countrywide-complaint.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2011/11/mf_bitcoin/all/1"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.powells.com/biblio/62-9780521713832-1"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.vukutu.com/blog/2010/08/railtrack-and-the-joint-action-society/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://underbelly-buce.blogspot.com/2010/08/mrs-b-on-company-of-strangers.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.softmachines.org/wordpress/?p=586"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://orgtheory.wordpress.com/2008/12/28/first-person-account-of-the-madoff-scam/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://orgtheory.wordpress.com/2008/12/28/embeddedness-and-trust-as-a-governance-mechanism-the-case-of-bernard-madoff/"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/philosophy-of-science/article/science-without-trust/13A5FD15D5ADFF4C67DDC1DF8D8FEB6C?WT.mc_id=New%2520Cambridge%2520Alert%2520-%2520Issues">
    <title>Science Without Trust | Philosophy of Science | Cambridge Core</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-08T16:55:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/philosophy-of-science/article/science-without-trust/13A5FD15D5ADFF4C67DDC1DF8D8FEB6C?WT.mc_id=New%2520Cambridge%2520Alert%2520-%2520Issues</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["It is often said that successful scientific research must be built on trust. Focusing on the alleged necessity of trust for successful scientific communication and thus for scientific cooperation (which underlies much of contemporary science), I argue that science mustn’t be built on trust. Appearances to the contrary come from a failure to distinguish different attitudes toward scientists’ testimony, in particular, trusting and relying on other scientists. This article proposes an account of scientific reliance and explains how it differs from scientific trust; it also shows why this distinction matters for science."]]></description>
<dc:subject>to:NB philosophy_of_science science_as_a_social_process trust machery.edouard</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:baa0d82bef89/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:to:NB"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:philosophy_of_science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:science_as_a_social_process"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:trust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:machery.edouard"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.03948">
    <title>[2105.03948] Trustworthiness of statistical inference</title>
    <dc:date>2021-05-12T18:32:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.03948</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["We examine the role of trustworthiness and trust in statistical inference, arguing that it is the extent of trustworthiness in inferential statistical tools which enables trust in the conclusions. Certain tools, such as the p-value and significance test, have recently come under renewed criticism, with some arguing that they damage trust in statistics. We argue the contrary, beginning from the position that the central role of these methods is to form the basis for trusted conclusions in the face of uncertainty in the data, and noting that it is the misuse and misunderstanding of these tools which damages trustworthiness and hence trust. We go on to argue that recent calls to ban these tools would tackle the symptom, not the cause, and themselves risk damaging the capability of science to advance, and feeding into public suspicion of the discipline of statistics. The consequence could be aggravated mistrust of our discipline and of science more generally. In short, the very proposals could work in quite the contrary direction from that intended. We make some alternative proposals for tackling the misuse and misunderstanding of these methods, and for how trust in our discipline might be promoted."]]></description>
<dc:subject>to:NB statistics trust science_as_a_social_process bad_data_analysis hand.david_j.</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:c95c5506079b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:to:NB"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:statistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:trust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:science_as_a_social_process"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:bad_data_analysis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:hand.david_j."/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://journals.aps.org/pre/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevE.102.062419">
    <title>Phys. Rev. E 102, 062419 (2020) - Stochastic evolutionary dynamics of trust games with asymmetric parameters</title>
    <dc:date>2020-12-23T03:17:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://journals.aps.org/pre/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevE.102.062419</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Trusting in others and reciprocating that trust with trustworthy actions are crucial to successful and prosperous societies. The trust game has been widely used to quantitatively study trust and trustworthiness, involving a sequential exchange between an investor and a trustee. Deterministic evolutionary game theory predicts no trust and no trustworthiness, whereas the behavioral experiments with the one-shot anonymous trust game show that people substantially trust and respond trustworthily. To explain these discrepancies, previous works often turn to additional mechanisms, which are borrowed from other games such as the prisoner's dilemma. Although these mechanisms lead to the evolution of trust and trustworthiness to an extent, the optimal or the most common strategy often involves no trustworthiness. In this paper, we study the impact of asymmetric demographic parameters (e.g., different population sizes) on game dynamics of the trust game. We show that, in a weak-mutation limit, stochastic evolutionary dynamics with the asymmetric parameters can lead to the evolution of high trust and high trustworthiness without any additional mechanisms in well-mixed finite populations. Even full trust and near full trustworthiness can be the most common strategies. These results are qualitatively different from those of the previous works. Our results thereby demonstrate rich evolutionary dynamics of the asymmetric trust game."]]></description>
<dc:subject>to:NB trust evolutionary_game_theory evolution_of_cooperation</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:c8e8f2e772fc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:to:NB"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:trust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:evolutionary_game_theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:evolution_of_cooperation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.wired.com/story/internet-made-dupes-cynics-of-us-all/">
    <title>The Internet Has Made Dupes—and Cynics—of Us All | WIRED</title>
    <dc:date>2019-08-15T19:56:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.wired.com/story/internet-made-dupes-cynics-of-us-all/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>networked_life internet trust sociology tufekci.zeynep</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:49141741b1bf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:networked_life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:trust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:sociology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:tufekci.zeynep"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://medium.com/@kaistinchcombe/decentralized-and-trustless-crypto-paradise-is-actually-a-medieval-hellhole-c1ca122efdec">
    <title>Blockchain is not only crappy technology but a bad vision for the future</title>
    <dc:date>2018-04-07T16:50:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://medium.com/@kaistinchcombe/decentralized-and-trustless-crypto-paradise-is-actually-a-medieval-hellhole-c1ca122efdec</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This is, of course, totally and completely correct, especially the bits about data entry.]]></description>
<dc:subject>have_read debunking via:? blockchain networked_life trust institutions re:no_one_makes_you_push_to_github we_were_promised_distributed_intelligence_and_we_got_idling_cars_to_trade_sudoku_for_heroin</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:c61e8c28389f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:have_read"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:debunking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:via:?"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:blockchain"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:networked_life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:trust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:institutions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:re:no_one_makes_you_push_to_github"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:we_were_promised_distributed_intelligence_and_we_got_idling_cars_to_trade_sudoku_for_heroin"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://aeon.co/magazine/technology/on-the-high-seas-of-the-hidden-internet/">
    <title>The reluctant king of the hidden internet – Henry Farrell – Aeon</title>
    <dc:date>2015-02-20T23:27:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://aeon.co/magazine/technology/on-the-high-seas-of-the-hidden-internet/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>have_read kith_and_kin crime institutions trust economics political_economy organized_crime_as_state_making farrell.henry blogged</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:5a05ba0b0ca2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:have_read"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:kith_and_kin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:crime"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:institutions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:trust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:political_economy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:organized_crime_as_state_making"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:farrell.henry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:blogged"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://henryfarrell.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Silk_Road.pdf">
    <title>A State of Trust without the State: The Political Economy of Pseudonymity and Cybercrime</title>
    <dc:date>2015-01-16T17:18:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://henryfarrell.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Silk_Road.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The state is the institution whose end is to suppress all such injustice as it does not itself commit" (ibn Khaldun, from memory)]]></description>
<dc:subject>to:NB have_read trust crime institutions kith_and_kin farrell.henry networked_life</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:aab64a202576/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:to:NB"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:have_read"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:trust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:crime"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:institutions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:kith_and_kin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:farrell.henry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:networked_life"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v516/n7529/full/nature13977.html">
    <title>Business culture and dishonesty in the banking industry : Nature : Nature Publishing Group</title>
    <dc:date>2014-12-06T17:06:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v516/n7529/full/nature13977.html</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Trust in others’ honesty is a key component of the long-term performance of firms, industries, and even whole countries1, 2, 3, 4. However, in recent years, numerous scandals involving fraud have undermined confidence in the financial industry5, 6, 7. Contemporary commentators have attributed these scandals to the financial sector’s business culture8, 9, 10, but no scientific evidence supports this claim. Here we show that employees of a large, international bank behave, on average, honestly in a control condition. However, when their professional identity as bank employees is rendered salient, a significant proportion of them become dishonest. This effect is specific to bank employees because control experiments with employees from other industries and with students show that they do not become more dishonest when their professional identity or bank-related items are rendered salient. Our results thus suggest that the prevailing business culture in the banking industry weakens and undermines the honesty norm, implying that measures to re-establish an honest culture are very important."

--- Comment is superfluous, except that as a customer, I really want to know which bank.]]></description>
<dc:subject>to:NB experimental_economics experimental_psychology trust evolution_of_cooperation institutions</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:2fedb643d943/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:to:NB"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:experimental_economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:experimental_psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:trust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:evolution_of_cooperation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:institutions"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.dailydot.com/crime/deep-web-boneless-optimuscrime-hackbb-credit-card-fraud/">
    <title>The Daily Dot - The blockbuster heist that rocked the Deep Web</title>
    <dc:date>2013-08-07T01:07:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.dailydot.com/crime/deep-web-boneless-optimuscrime-hackbb-credit-card-fraud/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[On the proposition that even a gang of bandits needs justice _among themselves_ if they are to rob effectively.]]></description>
<dc:subject>trust networked_life via:henry_farrell</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:7bc4491c9244/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:trust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:networked_life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:via:henry_farrell"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11238-011-9287-y">
    <title>Trust, inequality and the market - Springer</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-27T15:45:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11238-011-9287-y</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["This article examines, experimentally, whether inequality affects the social capital of trust in non-market and market settings. We consider three experimental treatments, one with equality, one with inequality but no knowledge of the income of other agents, and one with inequality and knowledge. Inequality, particularly when it is known, has a corrosive effect on trusting behaviours in this experiment. Agents appear to be less sensitive to known relative income differentials in markets than they are in the non-market settings, but trust in markets appears generally more vulnerable to the introduction of inequality than in the non-market setting."]]></description>
<dc:subject>to:NB experimental_psychology experimental_economics inequality trust</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:dd259cb1bffe/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:to:NB"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:experimental_psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:experimental_economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:inequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:trust"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://rajivsethi.blogspot.com/2012/02/countrywide-complaint.html">
    <title>Rajiv Sethi: The Countrywide Complaint and the Capitalization of Trust</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-17T16:21:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://rajivsethi.blogspot.com/2012/02/countrywide-complaint.html</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["distrust of traditional lending institutions such as commercial banks led some borrowers to seek out brokers from their own communities whom they felt they could trust. But these brokers were operating under high-powered incentives to inflate rates and fees and guide borrowers towards subprime products even when they were eligible for cheaper alternatives. The trust that was placed in the brokers allowed them greater flexibility to respond to these incentives and left borrowers worse off than the would have been if they had been more suspicious or better aware of the incentive structures in place.
"Viewed in this manner, the subprime saga has some broader implications. From the point of view of a company operating in multiple local markets with a diverse customer base, the strategy of giving local employees or contractors the discretion to adjust prices can be very profitable. This is especially so if these employees appear trustworthy to their customers, but are not in fact deserving of such trust. As Groucho Marx is reputed to have said: 'The secret of life is honesty and fair-dealing. If you can fake that you've got it made.' For products involving frequent repeat purchases by the same customer, reputation effects and competition can limit the degree of price discrimination. But the purchase of a home is an infrequent transaction for most people, and the complexity of the loan product precludes easy comparison with alternatives on offer. Trust then becomes a key determinant of pricing and transaction volume, especially when strong and hidden incentives for the betrayal of trust are in place.
"Betrayal also leads to the erosion of trust over time. It could be argued that trust is one of our most valuable public goods, substantially lowering the costs of transacting. In the complete absence of trust, the resources that would need to be devoted to monitoring would be prohibitive and many organizations and markets would simply not exist. Trust also comes naturally to most of us, based on simple cues such as those revealed in Reid's interviews. High-powered incentives to secure and then betray such trust are therefore costly not just to the immediate victim, but also to the community at large. This may be one of the less visible consequences of the subprime crisis."]]></description>
<dc:subject>mortgage_crisis fraud trust social_networks economics market_failures_in_everything</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:34dc1844b0d8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:mortgage_crisis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:fraud"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:trust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:social_networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:market_failures_in_everything"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2011/11/mf_bitcoin/all/1">
    <title>The Rise and Fall of Bitcoin</title>
    <dc:date>2011-11-27T16:04:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wired.com/magazine/2011/11/mf_bitcoin/all/1</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Interesting as a case study in economic sociology, though none of the participants seem to be equipped to recognize this.
(Predictably, the comments section is full of hurt bitcoin boosters.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>money networked_life economics financial_speculation trust banking via:kjhealy</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:2d3345a4e8d9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:money"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:networked_life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:financial_speculation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:trust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:banking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:via:kjhealy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.powells.com/biblio/62-9780521713832-1">
    <title>Seeley Lectures #7: Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust by Pierre Rosanvallon - Powell's Books</title>
    <dc:date>2011-02-24T18:38:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.powells.com/biblio/62-9780521713832-1</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>books:noted democracy trust via:shirky</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:6a97802acdc0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:books:noted"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:trust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:via:shirky"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.vukutu.com/blog/2010/08/railtrack-and-the-joint-action-society/">
    <title>Railtrack and the Joint-Action Society at Vukutu</title>
    <dc:date>2010-08-05T01:46:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.vukutu.com/blog/2010/08/railtrack-and-the-joint-action-society/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Most work for most people in the developed world is about coordinating their actions with those of others  – colleagues, partners, underlings, bosses, customers, distributors, suppliers, publicists, regulators ....   Information collection and transfer, while often important and sometimes essential to the co-ordination of actions,  is not usually itself the main game."  Consequently, we have not an "Information Society" but a "Joint-Action Society, although this does not quite capture all that is intended."  Resonates oddly with the recent Cuff, Permuter and Cover paper on "coordination capacity".
]]></description>
<dc:subject>information_society institutions collective_cognition collective_action trust market_failures_in_everything</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:66c8fbe80912/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:information_society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:institutions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:collective_cognition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:collective_action"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:trust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:market_failures_in_everything"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://underbelly-buce.blogspot.com/2010/08/mrs-b-on-company-of-strangers.html">
    <title>Underbelly: Mrs. B. on The Company of Strangers</title>
    <dc:date>2010-08-03T18:52:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://underbelly-buce.blogspot.com/2010/08/mrs-b-on-company-of-strangers.html</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>trust economics institutions</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:08daeaf670b2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:trust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:institutions"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.softmachines.org/wordpress/?p=586">
    <title>A crisis of trust? « Soft Machines</title>
    <dc:date>2009-10-23T12:37:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.softmachines.org/wordpress/?p=586</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Trust in science at all-time high"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>trust science_in_society to:blog</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:4ba3558d60a6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:trust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:science_in_society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:to:blog"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://orgtheory.wordpress.com/2008/12/28/first-person-account-of-the-madoff-scam/">
    <title>first person account of the madoff scam « orgtheory.net</title>
    <dc:date>2008-12-28T15:22:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://orgtheory.wordpress.com/2008/12/28/first-person-account-of-the-madoff-scam/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>trust institutions networks fraud madoff.bernie</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:b5fe1a673ace/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:trust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:institutions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:fraud"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:madoff.bernie"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://orgtheory.wordpress.com/2008/12/28/embeddedness-and-trust-as-a-governance-mechanism-the-case-of-bernard-madoff/">
    <title>embeddedness and trust as a governance mechanism: the case of bernard madoff « orgtheory.net</title>
    <dc:date>2008-12-28T15:21:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://orgtheory.wordpress.com/2008/12/28/embeddedness-and-trust-as-a-governance-mechanism-the-case-of-bernard-madoff/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>institutions fraud trust economic_sociology madoff.bernie</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:99dabec5f36c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:institutions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:fraud"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:trust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economic_sociology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:madoff.bernie"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>