<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (cshalizi)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from cshalizi</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://paulkrugman.substack.com/p/talking-with-henry-farrell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.gc.cuny.edu/CUNY_GC/media/LISCenter/pkrugman/FDT-intro.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/23/opinion/climate-coal-china-us.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v43/n08/adam-tooze/the-gatekeeper"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/16/opinion/what-do-we-actually-know-about-the-economy-wonkish.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/08/12/the-state-of-macro-is-sad-wonkish/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2015/10/12/2142030/you-see-money-doesnt-exist-in-the-24th-century/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/05/05/veg-o-matic-egonomics/?module=BlogPost-Title&amp;version=Blog%20Main&amp;contentCollection=Opinion&amp;action=Click&amp;pgtype=Blogs&amp;region=Body"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2014/may/08/thomas-piketty-new-gilded-age/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/20/single-malts-and-science-fiction/#postComment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/05/on-the-political-economy-of-permanent-stagnation/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/21/rents-and-returns-a-sketch-of-a-model-very-wonkish/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/06/bad-faith-and-civility-health-care-edition/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/16/the-smithkleinkalecki-theory-of-austerity/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2013/01/rough-transcript-stimulus-or-stymied-the-macroeconomics-of-recessions.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/05/ideology-and-economics/?smid=tw-NytimesKrugman&amp;seid=auto"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/22/sitcom-kabuki-trivial/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/20/the-new-republicans/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://webspace.princeton.edu/users/pkrugman/FDT%20intro.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/27/minksy-and-methodology-wonkish/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/26/opinion/krugman-lobbyists-guns-and-money.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/08/the-power-law-of-twitter/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/open-science-and-the-econoblogosphere/#"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/08/boom-for-whom/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/01/graduates-versus-oligarchs/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/31/opinion/bombs-bridges-and-jobs.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theonion.com/articles/this-sure-is-a-spooky-time-for-the-economy,26442/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/18/our-blogs-ourselves/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/17/legends-of-the-rentiers/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.princeton.edu/~pkrugman/oxrep.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/30/markets-can-be-very-very-wrong/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/11/the-years-of-shame/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.palgrave-journals.com/eej/journal/v37/n3/full/eej20118a.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/07/26/the-cult-that-is-destroying-america/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/07/12/insincerely-yours-2/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/6668"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/07/opinion/07krugman.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/21/opinion/21krugman.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/12/03/bourbon-economics/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/02/how-the-other-half-thinks/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/20/have-you-left-no-sense-of-decency/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2010/sep/30/slump-goes-why/?pagination=false"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.balloon-juice.com/2010/07/29/were-all-paul-krugman-now/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/28/tax-cut-truthiness/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/10/hayek-trade-restrictions-and-the-great-depression/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/07/why-isnt-investment-higher/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/05/24/did-the-postwar-system-fail/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2010/apr/19/our-giant-banking-crisis/?pagination=false"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/23/pesos-ponzi-and-financial-sector-profits/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/18/six-doctrines-in-search-of-a-policy-regime/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.princeton.edu/~pkrugman/aag.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/11/magazine/11Economy-t.html?hp=&amp;pagewanted=all"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/03/01/100301fa_fact_macfarquhar?currentPage=all"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://baselinescenario.com/2010/01/23/paul-krugman-for-the-fed/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/15/opinion/15krugman.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/09/opinion/09krugman.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pkarchive.org/new/values.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/magazine/06Economic-t.html?pagewanted=all"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/03/opinion/03krugman.html?_r=1&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/27/opinion/27krugman.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/10/credit-protection-madness/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/01/equilibrium-decadence-wonkish/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/17/slumps-and-spontaneous-remission-wonkish/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://crookedtimber.org/2009/02/10/are-blogs-ruining-economic-debate/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/31/another-temporary-misunderstanding/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2009/01/a-dark-age-of-macroeconomics.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/27/a-dark-age-of-macroeconomics-wonkish/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/25456948/what_obama_must_do/print"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/17/an-alternative-economic-strategy/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/19/opinion/19krugman.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=print"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://paulkrugman.substack.com/p/talking-with-henry-farrell">
    <title>Talking With Henry Farrell - Paul Krugman</title>
    <dc:date>2025-07-28T13:59:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://paulkrugman.substack.com/p/talking-with-henry-farrell</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>krugman.paul farrell.henry kith_and_kin the_continuing_crises running_dogs_of_reaction nerdworld our_decrepit_institutions</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:6215190ac714/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:farrell.henry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:kith_and_kin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:the_continuing_crises"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:running_dogs_of_reaction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:nerdworld"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:our_decrepit_institutions"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.gc.cuny.edu/CUNY_GC/media/LISCenter/pkrugman/FDT-intro.pdf">
    <title>Introduction to the Foundation Trilogy (Krugman)</title>
    <dc:date>2021-10-27T19:29:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.gc.cuny.edu/CUNY_GC/media/LISCenter/pkrugman/FDT-intro.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[--- I am honestly a little disappointed that Uncle Paul doesn't discuss the inspiration from statistical mechanics.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>krugman.paul asimov.isaac science_fiction literary_criticism social_science_methodology via:henry_farrell</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:8964ee0e6f9b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:asimov.isaac"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:science_fiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:literary_criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:social_science_methodology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:via:henry_farrell"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/23/opinion/climate-coal-china-us.html">
    <title>Opinion | Krugman Wonks Out: The China Shock and the Climate Shock - The New York Times</title>
    <dc:date>2021-05-11T03:00:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/23/opinion/climate-coal-china-us.html</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>have_read climate_change political_economy economic_geography krugman.paul</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:f72300da162b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:have_read"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:climate_change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:political_economy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economic_geography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v43/n08/adam-tooze/the-gatekeeper">
    <title>Adam Tooze · The Gatekeeper: Krugman’s Conversion · LRB 22 April 2021</title>
    <dc:date>2021-05-01T00:52:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v43/n08/adam-tooze/the-gatekeeper</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>krugman.paul economics history_of_ideas tooze.adam us_politics class_struggles_in_america whats_gone_wrong_with_america the_continuing_crises lives_of_the_scholars</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:dde03606fa56/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:history_of_ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:tooze.adam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:us_politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:class_struggles_in_america"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:whats_gone_wrong_with_america"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:the_continuing_crises"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:lives_of_the_scholars"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/16/opinion/what-do-we-actually-know-about-the-economy-wonkish.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss">
    <title>Opinion | What Do We Actually Know About the Economy? (Wonkish) - The New York Times</title>
    <dc:date>2018-09-19T03:33:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/16/opinion/what-do-we-actually-know-about-the-economy-wonkish.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>krugman.paul economics social_science_methodology</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:bfe04f81106a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:social_science_methodology"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/08/12/the-state-of-macro-is-sad-wonkish/">
    <title>The State of Macro Is Sad (Wonkish) - The New York Times</title>
    <dc:date>2016-08-15T15:17:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/08/12/the-state-of-macro-is-sad-wonkish/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>have_read re:your_favorite_dsge_sucks macroeconomics krugman.paul</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:394f044f2903/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:have_read"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:re:your_favorite_dsge_sucks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:macroeconomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2015/10/12/2142030/you-see-money-doesnt-exist-in-the-24th-century/">
    <title>“You see, money doesn’t exist in the 24th century” | FT Alphaville</title>
    <dc:date>2015-10-13T03:56:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2015/10/12/2142030/you-see-money-doesnt-exist-in-the-24th-century/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[_Reuse Your Weapons_ would be a great name for a Culture navy-surplus ship.]]></description>
<dc:subject>economics progressive_forces science_fiction krugman.paul delong.brad</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:b83e7062052a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:progressive_forces"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:science_fiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:delong.brad"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/05/05/veg-o-matic-egonomics/?module=BlogPost-Title&amp;version=Blog%20Main&amp;contentCollection=Opinion&amp;action=Click&amp;pgtype=Blogs&amp;region=Body">
    <title>Veg-O-Matic Egonomics - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2015-05-05T15:58:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/05/05/veg-o-matic-egonomics/?module=BlogPost-Title&amp;version=Blog%20Main&amp;contentCollection=Opinion&amp;action=Click&amp;pgtype=Blogs&amp;region=Body</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["All successful researchers have gigantic egos. If they didn’t — if they did not have, at the core of their being, a frightening level of intellectual arrogance — they would never have had the temerity to decide that they had insights denied to all the extremely clever scholars who preceded them. And it takes even more egotism to persist in the face of all the people who will, in fact, tell you that your insight is trivial, it’s wrong, and they said it in 1962.
"So we’re all monsters, however nice we may seem in person. But there’s still the matter of self-awareness and self-control — the ability to set limits, to avoid the temptation to spend your life claiming that the insights you had decades ago were the final word on the subject, maybe even the final word on all subjects."

--- The rest of the post is worthwhile, but of more transient interest than those paragraphs.]]></description>
<dc:subject>moral_psychology science_as_a_social_process intellectuals krugman.paul</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:70025cbda057/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:moral_psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:science_as_a_social_process"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:intellectuals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2014/may/08/thomas-piketty-new-gilded-age/">
    <title>Why We’re in a New Gilded Age by Paul Krugman | The New York Review of Books</title>
    <dc:date>2014-04-10T16:54:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2014/may/08/thomas-piketty-new-gilded-age/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>inequality economics economic_history book_reviews piketty.thomas krugman.paul class_struggles_in_america</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:42155121e159/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:inequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economic_history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:book_reviews"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:piketty.thomas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:class_struggles_in_america"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/20/single-malts-and-science-fiction/#postComment">
    <title>Single Malts and Science Fiction - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2013-07-22T02:38:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/20/single-malts-and-science-fiction/#postComment</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[What I wouldn't have given to have listened to _that_ conversation.]]></description>
<dc:subject>krugman.paul macleod.ken stross.charles</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:c7a4430113bd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:macleod.ken"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:stross.charles"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/05/on-the-political-economy-of-permanent-stagnation/">
    <title>On The Political Economy Of Permanent Stagnation - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2013-07-08T16:51:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/05/on-the-political-economy-of-permanent-stagnation/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I guess what I’m saying is that I worry that a more or less permanent depression could end up simply becoming accepted as the way things are, that we could suffer endless, gratuitous suffering, yet the political and policy elite would feel no need to change its ways."]]></description>
<dc:subject>political_economy class_struggles_in_america financial_crisis_of_2007-- krugman.paul</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:0dca0be16fee/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:political_economy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:class_struggles_in_america"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:financial_crisis_of_2007--"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/21/rents-and-returns-a-sketch-of-a-model-very-wonkish/">
    <title>Rents and Returns: A Sketch of a Model (Very Wonkish) - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-22T15:36:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/21/rents-and-returns-a-sketch-of-a-model-very-wonkish/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>economics imperfect_competition inequality krugman.paul</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:fdf6a2254520/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:imperfect_competition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:inequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/06/bad-faith-and-civility-health-care-edition/">
    <title>Bad Faith and Civility, Health Care Edition - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-06T14:09:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/06/bad-faith-and-civility-health-care-edition/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["If someone says the sky is green, you prove that it’s actually blue, and the next day he comes back once again insisting that the sky is green, and this happens repeatedly, you eventually have to acknowledge that mannerly debate about the color of the sky just isn’t enough; you have to go meta, and talk about the fact that this guy and his friends just aren’t in the business of honest discussion.
"Inevitably, there are some people trying to turn the conversation meta in a different direction, and make it all about civility. But bad-faith arguments don’t deserve a civil response, and if the attempt to be civil gets in the way of exposing the bad faith, civility itself becomes part of the problem."]]></description>
<dc:subject>rhetoric krugman.paul re:g_paper argument</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:9efa2a3aca66/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:rhetoric"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:re:g_paper"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:argument"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/16/the-smithkleinkalecki-theory-of-austerity/">
    <title>The Smith/Klein/Kalecki Theory of Austerity - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2013-05-16T18:52:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/16/the-smithkleinkalecki-theory-of-austerity/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>political_economy krugman.paul financial_crisis_of_2007--</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:c5dbf679f8d0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:political_economy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:financial_crisis_of_2007--"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2013/01/rough-transcript-stimulus-or-stymied-the-macroeconomics-of-recessions.html">
    <title>Brad DeLong : ROUGH TRANSCRIPT: Stimulus or Stymied?: The Macroeconomics of Recessions</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-19T16:20:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2013/01/rough-transcript-stimulus-or-stymied-the-macroeconomics-of-recessions.html</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Uhlig's performance here, at least as presented through the transcript, is rather disappointing.]]></description>
<dc:subject>economics macroeconomics economic_policy financial_crisis_of_2007-- krugman.paul delong.brad uhlig.harald</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:0b52a853eec6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:macroeconomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economic_policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:financial_crisis_of_2007--"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:delong.brad"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:uhlig.harald"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/05/ideology-and-economics/?smid=tw-NytimesKrugman&amp;seid=auto">
    <title>Ideology and Economics - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-05T19:23:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/05/ideology-and-economics/?smid=tw-NytimesKrugman&amp;seid=auto</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["OK, here’s how I read the Gordon and Dahl results: what they show is that most of what economists do is indeed fairly objective and non-ideological; business-cycle macro, although it’s not at all like that, is a small enough part of the academic field that their data don’t pick it up.
"Unfortunately, while business-cycle macro may not be a large part of what economists do, it’s a field that matters a lot – especially with the world still facing its worst economic crisis in three generations.
"And business-cycle macro is also, I’d argue, more important to the field of economics in general than most economists themselves realize.
"Long ago I stumbled on an analogy that still seems relevant to me: business-cycle macro is to economics in general in something like the way that nuclear bombs (and to some extent, to be fair, nuclear power) are to high-energy physics. I’m sure that very few physicists working on the mysteries of the universe trouble themselves at all thinking about how to make things go boom. Yet the reason the field continues to receive public funding is in large part precisely the fact that once upon a time physicists did, indeed, find a way to make things go boom, and you never know what they might come up with in the future.
"Similarly, while the vast majority of economists may work on issues far removed from the question of what to do in a depression, an important part of our field’s prestige and the support it receives comes from the perception that economists do indeed have useful advice to offer in times of depression, and may come up with more useful advice in the future.
"And if the perception spreads, instead, that business-cycle macro is just ideological posturing, that influential economists choose their doctrines to suit their political prejudices, and that the field not only fails to progress but sometimes actually retrogresses, this will be bad for the profession as well as the world."]]></description>
<dc:subject>economics macroeconomics ideology science_as_a_social_process economic_policy financial_crisis_of_2007-- krugman.paul</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:64a42199b770/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:macroeconomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:ideology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:science_as_a_social_process"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economic_policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:financial_crisis_of_2007--"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/22/sitcom-kabuki-trivial/">
    <title>Sitcom Kabuki (Trivial) - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2012-12-22T18:24:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/22/sitcom-kabuki-trivial/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["OK, so I’ve just spent a number of hours on domestic flights, the kind that show sitcoms on screens down the middle of the aisle. (Which is why I was too tired for Friday Night Music — next week). I didn’t listen to any of the dialogue – I was reading – but I did find myself watching some of the acting. And with the sound off, you can really see just how artificial the conventions of sitcom acting are: the telegraphed double-takes, the faux-angry declarations of the men, the perkiness of the women, etc., etc. – none of it resembling at all the way real people behave. It’s an art form, if you like, that’s as deeply stylized and full of conventional signifiers as Kabuki theater or Chinese opera; the actors might as well be wearing ritual masks representing their alleged characters and emotions.
"It’s also, of course, a cultural form that’s very, very stupid."]]></description>
<dc:subject>drama literary_criticism cultural_criticism krugman.paul television</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:4773546b6fb5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:drama"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:literary_criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:cultural_criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:television"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/20/the-new-republicans/">
    <title>The New Republicans - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2012-11-20T19:58:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/20/the-new-republicans/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["it’s true that there are some Republican intellectuals and pundits who seem to be truly open-minded about both economic and social issues. But I worded that carefully: they “seem to be” open-minded; indeed, they’re professional seemers. When it matters, they can always be counted on — after making a big show of stroking their chins and agonizing — to follow the party line, and reject anything that doesn’t go along with the preacher-plutocrat agenda. If they don’t deliver when it counts, they are excommunicated; see Frum, David.
"Anyone who imagines that there is any real soul-searching going on is deluding himself or herself."

(For "anyone", read, "My fellow NYTimes columnist David Brooks".)]]></description>
<dc:subject>us_politics running_dogs_of_reaction krugman.paul</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:a018785b8897/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:us_politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:running_dogs_of_reaction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://webspace.princeton.edu/users/pkrugman/FDT%20intro.pdf">
    <title>Krugman's Introduction to The Foundation Trilogy</title>
    <dc:date>2012-10-16T20:36:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://webspace.princeton.edu/users/pkrugman/FDT%20intro.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Oh, c'mon, no credit to John Rogers by name, as opposed to "an Internet meme"?
But otherwise, very nice.]]></description>
<dc:subject>science_fiction krugman.paul asimov.isaac</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:52c22ab22eeb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:science_fiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:asimov.isaac"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/27/minksy-and-methodology-wonkish/">
    <title>Minksy and Methodology (Wonkish) - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2012-03-27T17:28:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/27/minksy-and-methodology-wonkish/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>social_science_methodology krugman.paul economics modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:1a8e64db32ba/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:social_science_methodology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:modeling"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/26/opinion/krugman-lobbyists-guns-and-money.html">
    <title>Lobbyists, Guns and Money - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2012-03-26T14:51:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/26/opinion/krugman-lobbyists-guns-and-money.html</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[It's as though they look at public choice theory and see a blueprint not a critique.]]></description>
<dc:subject>us_politics vast_right-wing_conspiracy running_dogs_of_reaction class_struggles_in_america political_economy krugman.paul</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:6532d30c51a3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:us_politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:vast_right-wing_conspiracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:running_dogs_of_reaction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:class_struggles_in_america"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:political_economy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/08/the-power-law-of-twitter/">
    <title>The Power (Law) of Twitter - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-08T18:14:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/08/the-power-law-of-twitter/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[And here I was worried from the headline that I might have to call out Uncle Paul.]]></description>
<dc:subject>twitter social_media heavy_tails krugman.paul</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:353dc690a140/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:social_media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:heavy_tails"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/open-science-and-the-econoblogosphere/#">
    <title>Open Science And The Econoblogosphere - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2012-01-17T22:33:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/open-science-and-the-econoblogosphere/#</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>science_as_a_social_process social_life_of_the_mind economics sociology_of_science krugman.paul computer_networks_as_provinces_of_the_commonwealth_of_letters</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:21e9bf5133c7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:science_as_a_social_process"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:social_life_of_the_mind"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:sociology_of_science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:computer_networks_as_provinces_of_the_commonwealth_of_letters"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/08/boom-for-whom/">
    <title>Boom For Whom - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2011-11-13T15:41:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/08/boom-for-whom/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The point is that these are pure fantasies on the part of the right. The true age of spectacular growth in the United States and other advanced economies was the generation after World War II, with post-Reagan growth nowhere near comparable. So why do these people imagine otherwise?

And the answer, once you think about it, is obvious: growth for whom? There’s only one way in which the post-deregulation boom was exceptional, and that’s in terms of the growth in incomes at the top of the scale.

Here’s a comparison of the postwar boom with the deregulation alleged boom, using real average family income from the Census and real average income for the top 1 percent from Piketty and Saez:

[graph omitted]

If you’re looking at the average, the last generation is a poor shadow of the postwar boom. But if you’re talking about the 1 percent, wonderful things have happened."]]></description>
<dc:subject>inequality economic_growth whats_gone_wrong_with_america krugman.paul</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:964994001880/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:inequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economic_growth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:whats_gone_wrong_with_america"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/01/graduates-versus-oligarchs/">
    <title>Graduates Versus Oligarchs - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2011-11-01T17:57:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/01/graduates-versus-oligarchs/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The big gains have gone to the top 0.1 percent.  So income inequality in America really is about oligarchs versus everyone else. When the Occupy Wall Street people talk about the 99 percent, they’re actually aiming too low."]]></description>
<dc:subject>inequality class_struggles_in_america whats_gone_wrong_with_america krugman.paul</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:1947e755fdfa/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:inequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:class_struggles_in_america"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:whats_gone_wrong_with_america"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/31/opinion/bombs-bridges-and-jobs.html">
    <title>Bombs, Bridges and Jobs - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2011-10-31T11:52:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/31/opinion/bombs-bridges-and-jobs.html</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Is this the first time Kalecki got mentioned on the Times editorial page?]]></description>
<dc:subject>us_politics military_industrial_complex the_continuing_crises krugman.paul economic_policy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:2768853dd01d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:us_politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:military_industrial_complex"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:the_continuing_crises"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economic_policy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theonion.com/articles/this-sure-is-a-spooky-time-for-the-economy,26442/">
    <title>This Sure Is A Spooky Time For The Economy | The Onion - America's Finest News Source</title>
    <dc:date>2011-10-25T16:37:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theonion.com/articles/this-sure-is-a-spooky-time-for-the-economy,26442/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[While I don't _think_ this is actually Krugman, it's a little disturbing that I can't be sure.  --- ETA: It's not (http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/26/onion/).
]]></description>
<dc:subject>funny:geeky funny:laughing_instead_of_screaming affectionate_parody only_maybe_not krugman.paul</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:7810bb61acb0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:funny:geeky"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:funny:laughing_instead_of_screaming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:affectionate_parody"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:only_maybe_not"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/18/our-blogs-ourselves/">
    <title>Our Blogs, Ourselves - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2011-10-18T19:47:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/18/our-blogs-ourselves/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>krugman.paul blogging economics invisible_colleges computer_networks_as_provinces_of_the_commonwealth_of_letters</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:b7029c6da12b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:invisible_colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:computer_networks_as_provinces_of_the_commonwealth_of_letters"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/17/legends-of-the-rentiers/">
    <title>Legends Of The Rentiers - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2011-10-17T23:20:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/17/legends-of-the-rentiers/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["And as you’ll notice, in both cases the imaginary history just happened to be one more comfortable to status quo interests.  I don’t want to go all Chomsky here, but this sort of thing really can radicalize you."]]></description>
<dc:subject>why_oh_why_cant_we_have_a_better_press_corps natural_history_of_truthiness krugman.paul</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:be0b58118d41/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:why_oh_why_cant_we_have_a_better_press_corps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:natural_history_of_truthiness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.princeton.edu/~pkrugman/oxrep.pdf">
    <title>How Complicated Does the Model Have to Be? (Krugman)</title>
    <dc:date>2011-10-08T18:26:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.princeton.edu/~pkrugman/oxrep.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Oldie but goodie from Uncle Paul.]]></description>
<dc:subject>macroeconomics economics krugman.paul to:NB</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:746d7e08b0bd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:macroeconomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:to:NB"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/30/markets-can-be-very-very-wrong/">
    <title>Markets Can Be Very, Very Wrong - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2011-10-01T23:03:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/30/markets-can-be-very-very-wrong/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>economics market_failures_in_everything externalities pollution krugman.paul nordhaus.william</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:329aa544d922/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:market_failures_in_everything"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:externalities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:pollution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:nordhaus.william"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/11/the-years-of-shame/">
    <title>The Years of Shame - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2011-09-11T16:02:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/11/the-years-of-shame/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["What happened after 9/11 — and I think even people on the right know this, whether they admit it or not — was deeply shameful. The atrocity should have been a unifying event, but instead it became a wedge issue. Fake heroes like Bernie Kerik, Rudy Giuliani, and, yes, George W. Bush raced to cash in on the horror. And then the attack was used to justify an unrelated war the neocons wanted to fight, for all the wrong reasons.
A lot of other people behaved badly. How many of our professional pundits — people who should have understood very well what was happening — took the easy way out, turning a blind eye to the corruption and lending their support to the hijacking of the atrocity?
The memory of 9/11 has been irrevocably poisoned; it has become an occasion for shame. And in its heart, the nation knows it."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>the_continuing_crises 9/11 krugman.paul our_national_shame historical_memory</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:8fc22dbfaed3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:the_continuing_crises"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:9/11"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:our_national_shame"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:historical_memory"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.palgrave-journals.com/eej/journal/v37/n3/full/eej20118a.html">
    <title>Eastern Economic Journal - The Profession and the Crisis</title>
    <dc:date>2011-09-09T12:01:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.palgrave-journals.com/eej/journal/v37/n3/full/eej20118a.html</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["So we’re having an economic crisis. I say “having,” not “had,” because we have by no means recovered. Financial panic may have subsided, stocks may be up, but employment remains far below pre-crisis levels, and unemployment — especially long-term unemployment — remains disastrously high. And while you can make the case that the economy is slowly on the mend, slowly is the operative word. We have already been through two years of economic purgatory, and there's no end in sight.
There is a real sense in which times like these are what economists are for, just as wars are what career military officers are for. OK, maybe I can let microeconomists off the hook. But macroeconomics is, above all, about understanding and preventing or at least mitigating economic downturns. This crisis was the time for the economics profession to justify its existence, for us academic scribblers to show what all our models and analysis are good for.
We have not, to put it mildly, delivered."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>economics financial_crisis_of_2007-- krugman.paul</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:22fb6085aa76/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:financial_crisis_of_2007--"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/07/26/the-cult-that-is-destroying-america/">
    <title>The Cult That Is Destroying America - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-27T18:43:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/07/26/the-cult-that-is-destroying-america/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>our_decrepit_institutions journalism krugman.paul why_oh_why_cant_we_have_a_better_press_corps us_politics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:0e773175eeb5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:our_decrepit_institutions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:why_oh_why_cant_we_have_a_better_press_corps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:us_politics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/07/12/insincerely-yours-2/">
    <title>Insincerely Yours - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-12T13:32:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/07/12/insincerely-yours-2/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["You can’t make any sense of American political discourse if you give everyone credit for really wanting what they claim to want. My sense is that there are very few true deficit hawks; the vast majority of those who claim that title are really just using the deficit to pursue the goal of a more unequal society."  Well, yes.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>us_politics krugman.paul class_struggles_in_america</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:ac0ea76f41ce/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:us_politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:class_struggles_in_america"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/6668">
    <title>Mr Keynes and the moderns | vox - Research-based policy analysis and commentary from leading economists</title>
    <dc:date>2011-06-21T20:08:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/6668</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>economics economic_policy macroeconomics krugman.paul keynes.john_maynard financial_crisis_of_2007--</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:839f1da84d4c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economic_policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:macroeconomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:keynes.john_maynard"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:financial_crisis_of_2007--"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/07/opinion/07krugman.html">
    <title>Degrees and Dollars - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2011-03-07T16:57:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/07/opinion/07krugman.html</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>economics inequality technological_change technological_unemployment whats_gone_wrong_with_america krugman.paul</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:783269f219ba/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:inequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:technological_change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:technological_unemployment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:whats_gone_wrong_with_america"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/21/opinion/21krugman.html">
    <title>Wisconsin Power Play - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2011-02-21T17:28:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/21/opinion/21krugman.html</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Observation: the longer Krugman keeps writing about political economy, the more he sounds like an angrier John Kenneth Galbraith.  Here he's calling for counterveiling power.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>krugman.paul labor unions counterveiling_power wisconsin us_politics whats_gone_wrong_with_america political_economy</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:8f96930f5bfd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:unions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:counterveiling_power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:wisconsin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:us_politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:whats_gone_wrong_with_america"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:political_economy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/12/03/bourbon-economics/">
    <title>Bourbon Economics - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2010-12-05T02:10:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/12/03/bourbon-economics/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["By 1988, it was already obvious that equilibrium business cycle theory had failed. Shiller had already circulated his devastating demonstration that asset prices were much too volatile to be explained by fundamentals, and the 1987 market crash had provided an object lesson in panic. ... And nothing happened. Real business cycle theory continued to prosper, developing an increasing stranglehold over the professional journals. Behavioral finance stayed on the margins. The equilibrium guys had learned nothing and forgotten nothing; and by the time 2008 came around, the ravages of time had left people who actually understood demand-side shocks much thinner on the ground than they had been 20 years earlier. Our problem, in short, isn’t lack of nifty new ideas; it’s the refusal of too many economists to face up to the fact that some of their preferred theories don’t work, a fact that has been obvious for decades."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>economics macroeconomics scholarly_misconstruction_of_reality krugman.paul</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:8c0fb68a4290/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:macroeconomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:scholarly_misconstruction_of_reality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/02/how-the-other-half-thinks/">
    <title>How The Other Half Thinks - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2010-10-02T17:49:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/02/how-the-other-half-thinks/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["While the other side was making these predictions, people like me were saying that classical economics was all wrong in a liquidity trap. Government borrowing did not confront a fixed supply of funds: we were in a paradox of thrift world, where desired savings (at full employment) exceeded desired investment, and hence savings would expand to meet the demand, and interest rates need not rise. As for inflation, increases in the monetary base would have no effect in a liquidity trap; deflation, not inflation, was the risk. ... The 10-year bond rate is about 2.5 percent, lower than it was when Ferguson made that prediction. Inflation keeps falling. The attacks on Keynesianism now come down to “but unemployment has stayed high!” [but] if you took a Keynesian view seriously,... given what we knew in early 2009 ... the stimulus was much too small to restore full employment."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>economics macroeconomics economic_policy financial_crisis_of_2007-- krugman.paul</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:03e68075a8bf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:macroeconomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economic_policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:financial_crisis_of_2007--"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/20/have-you-left-no-sense-of-decency/">
    <title>Have You Left No Sense Of Decency? - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2010-09-20T17:26:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/20/have-you-left-no-sense-of-decency/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>inequality moral_psychology decline_of_american_character whats_gone_wrong_with_america krugman.paul</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:47b9a1fc62cb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:inequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:moral_psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:decline_of_american_character"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:whats_gone_wrong_with_america"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2010/sep/30/slump-goes-why/?pagination=false">
    <title>The Slump Goes On: Why? | The New York Review of Books</title>
    <dc:date>2010-09-09T00:22:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2010/sep/30/slump-goes-why/?pagination=false</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[But surely the _scientific_ answer is that we all continue to have a much higher preference for leisure than we did in 2007!
]]></description>
<dc:subject>macroeconomics financial_markets financial_crisis_of_2007-- krugman.paul wells.robin</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:23e43fb3eeb5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:macroeconomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:financial_markets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:financial_crisis_of_2007--"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:wells.robin"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.balloon-juice.com/2010/07/29/were-all-paul-krugman-now/">
    <title>Balloon Juice » Blog Archive » We’re All Paul Krugman Now</title>
    <dc:date>2010-07-29T23:07:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.balloon-juice.com/2010/07/29/were-all-paul-krugman-now/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Wouldn’t it be awesome if the Fed and other government agencies took advantage of domestic Nobel Prize winning economists? For christ sake- someone google “Krugman+lost+decade” and tell me how many hits you come up with. He’s done just about everything except tattoo it on his chest and back and then do a pay-per-view boxing match with Tonya Harding."  --- Would that work, I wonder?
]]></description>
<dc:subject>funny:laughing_instead_of_screaming financial_crisis_of_2007-- krugman.paul economic_policy</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:edadd68d73fe/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:funny:laughing_instead_of_screaming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:financial_crisis_of_2007--"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economic_policy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/28/tax-cut-truthiness/">
    <title>Tax Cut Truthiness - Paul Krugman Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2010-07-28T12:36:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/28/tax-cut-truthiness/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>utter_stupidity economics evisceration krugman.paul running_dogs_of_reaction natural_history_of_truthiness views_on_the_shape_of_the_earth_differ erickson.erick</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:5114fb3e69c5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:utter_stupidity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:evisceration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:running_dogs_of_reaction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:natural_history_of_truthiness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:views_on_the_shape_of_the_earth_differ"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:erickson.erick"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/10/hayek-trade-restrictions-and-the-great-depression/">
    <title>Hayek, Trade Restrictions, And The Great Depression - Paul Krugman Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2010-07-10T22:01:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/10/hayek-trade-restrictions-and-the-great-depression/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Bear in mind that what protectionism does, according to textbook economics, is to cause a misallocation of resources, reducing the economy’s efficiency. It does not cause mass unemployment of resources — which is what the Depression was about. ... But going back to Hayek: attributing the failure to recover to trade restrictions was, in a way, characteristic. Hayek, like his modern followers, never could get his mind wrapped around the fact that the key problem in depressions, and the key observation his theory needed to explain, wasn’t misallocation of labor and other resources — it was mass unemployment. It’s not surprising to see that in the depths of depression he was focused on removing what was, in the end, a minor source of allocative inefficiency. But it’s a stark reminder of the extent to which he really, truly, didn’t get it."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>economic_history economics macroeconomics great_depression krugman.paul hayek.f.a._von</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:fa54106bb39d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economic_history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:macroeconomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:great_depression"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:hayek.f.a._von"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/07/why-isnt-investment-higher/">
    <title>Why Isn’t Investment Higher? - Paul Krugman Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2010-07-08T05:16:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/07/why-isnt-investment-higher/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I am only surprised he doesn't end this "This has been another edition of Simple Answers to Easy Questions".
]]></description>
<dc:subject>economics macroeconomics krugman.paul financial_crisis_of_2007--</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:8c660f3f8749/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:macroeconomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:financial_crisis_of_2007--"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/05/24/did-the-postwar-system-fail/">
    <title>Did The Postwar System Fail? - Paul Krugman Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2010-05-28T03:25:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/05/24/did-the-postwar-system-fail/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Funny, isn’t it? The Ford-Carter years look no worse — in fact, somewhat better — than the Bush years, especially if you look from business cycle peak to business cycle peak. And that was in the face of two very severe oil shocks. So a question for all the people who say that the economic troubles under Jimmy Carter discredited postwar economic policies: why don’t the troubles under Bush similarly discredit post-Reagan policies? ... [I]nflation did have to be brought down — and Paul Volcker, not Reagan, did what was necessary. But the rest — slashing taxes on the rich, breaking the unions, letting inflation erode the minimum wage — wasn’t necessary at all... In the modern vision, the old US economy is seen as an absurd, unworkable thing. Where were the incentives to grow super-rich? How did you manage with all those well-paid, organized workers? ... Radical change happened because a powerful political movement wanted it, not out of economic necessity."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>political_economy economics ideology krugman.paul whats_gone_wrong_with_america running_dogs_of_reaction</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:0cdfc1a6b1c8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:political_economy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:ideology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:whats_gone_wrong_with_america"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:running_dogs_of_reaction"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2010/apr/19/our-giant-banking-crisis/?pagination=false">
    <title>Our Giant Banking Crisis—What to Expect | The New York Review of Books</title>
    <dc:date>2010-04-26T23:54:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2010/apr/19/our-giant-banking-crisis/?pagination=false</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In that sense, this time really is different: while the first great global financial crisis was followed by major reforms, it’s not clear that anything comparable will happen after the second. And history tells us what will happen if those reforms don’t take place. There will be a resurgence of financial folly, which always flourishes given a chance. And the consequence of that folly will be more and quite possibly worse crises in the years to come."  --- I wonder, does Krugman read Ken MacLeod?  If not, someone should send him a copy of The Fall Revolution.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>banking financial_crisis_of_2007-- economic_history book_reviews economic_policy economics krugman.paul market_bubbles the_continuing_crises wells.robin</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:fb1ed7a8b254/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:banking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:financial_crisis_of_2007--"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economic_history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:book_reviews"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economic_policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:market_bubbles"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:the_continuing_crises"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:wells.robin"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/23/pesos-ponzi-and-financial-sector-profits/">
    <title>Pesos, Ponzi, And Financial Sector Profits - Paul Krugman Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2010-04-24T14:43:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/23/pesos-ponzi-and-financial-sector-profits/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Krugman elaborates on the idea of a naturally-occurring Ponzi process.  I smell a model...
]]></description>
<dc:subject>market_bubbles financial_speculation ponzi_schemes krugman.paul economics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:1b655ea1c8e1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:market_bubbles"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:financial_speculation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:ponzi_schemes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/18/six-doctrines-in-search-of-a-policy-regime/">
    <title>Six Doctrines In Search Of A Policy Regime - Paul Krugman Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2010-04-19T01:33:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/18/six-doctrines-in-search-of-a-policy-regime/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>economics finance financial_crisis_of_2007-- regulation krugman.paul the_continuing_crises</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:14d2a114d5f6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:finance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:financial_crisis_of_2007--"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:regulation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:the_continuing_crises"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.princeton.edu/~pkrugman/aag.pdf">
    <title>&quot;THE NEW ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, NOW MIDDLE-AGED&quot;</title>
    <dc:date>2010-04-16T12:30:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.princeton.edu/~pkrugman/aag.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Krugman looks back on his _Geography and Trade_ after 20 years, before an audience of actual geographers.  With how-I-model reflections.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>economics economic_geography geography increasing_returns imperfect_competition modeling krugman.paul economic_history</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:08db939de100/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economic_geography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:geography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:increasing_returns"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:imperfect_competition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:modeling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economic_history"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/11/magazine/11Economy-t.html?hp=&amp;pagewanted=all">
    <title>Krugman - Building a Green Economy - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2010-04-08T18:51:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/11/magazine/11Economy-t.html?hp=&amp;pagewanted=all</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Uncle Paul explains the economics of climate change policy.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>krugman.paul economics economic_policy climate_change</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:d9419b00982b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economic_policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:climate_change"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/03/01/100301fa_fact_macfarquhar?currentPage=all">
    <title>How Paul Krugman found politics : The New Yorker</title>
    <dc:date>2010-02-22T14:03:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/03/01/100301fa_fact_macfarquhar?currentPage=all</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[PK: "[Even] if I do have some brilliant academic insight, what are they going to do, give me a Nobel Prize?"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>krugman.paul progressive_forces lives_of_the_scientists via:krugman economics political_economy</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:f780ea87e095/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:progressive_forces"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:lives_of_the_scientists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:via:krugman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:political_economy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://baselinescenario.com/2010/01/23/paul-krugman-for-the-fed/">
    <title>Paul Krugman For The Fed « The Baseline Scenario</title>
    <dc:date>2010-01-23T16:45:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://baselinescenario.com/2010/01/23/paul-krugman-for-the-fed/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Draft Krugman!
]]></description>
<dc:subject>modest_proposals economic_policy financial_crisis_of_2007-- krugman.paul us_politics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:1283cb20a2b2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:modest_proposals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economic_policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:financial_crisis_of_2007--"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:us_politics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/15/opinion/15krugman.html">
    <title>Op-Ed Columnist - Bankers Without a Clue - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2010-01-15T13:38:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/15/opinion/15krugman.html</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I am happy to see Krugman's synopsis of the crisis agrees with my half-assed speculations.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>financial_crisis_of_2007-- regulation whats_gone_wrong_with_america krugman.paul</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:598aa01a7ca2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:financial_crisis_of_2007--"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:regulation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:whats_gone_wrong_with_america"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/09/opinion/09krugman.html">
    <title>Op-Ed Columnist - Paranoia Strikes Deep - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2009-11-09T18:19:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/09/opinion/09krugman.html</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>krugman.paul running_dogs_of_reaction vast_right-wing_conspiracy us_politics whats_gone_wrong_with_america pure_products_of_america</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:82cf90268e7d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:running_dogs_of_reaction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:vast_right-wing_conspiracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:us_politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:whats_gone_wrong_with_america"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:pure_products_of_america"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.pkarchive.org/new/values.html">
    <title>Krugman: Entertainment Values</title>
    <dc:date>2009-09-08T23:52:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.pkarchive.org/new/values.html</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Krugman savages Kevin Kelly's "New Rules for a New Economy", back when those were new.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>economics increasing_returns evisceration krugman.paul the_wired_ideology kelly.kevin_the_stupid_one</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:52076dbf21e8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:increasing_returns"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:evisceration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:the_wired_ideology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:kelly.kevin_the_stupid_one"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/magazine/06Economic-t.html?pagewanted=all">
    <title>How Did Economists Get It So Wrong? - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2009-09-04T22:05:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/magazine/06Economic-t.html?pagewanted=all</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>economics macroeconomics finance financial_crisis_of_2007-- krugman.paul</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:ededfe89c561/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:macroeconomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:finance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:financial_crisis_of_2007--"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/03/opinion/03krugman.html?_r=1&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss">
    <title>Op-Ed Columnist - Rewarding Bad Actors - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2009-08-03T12:19:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/03/opinion/03krugman.html?_r=1&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Shorter Krugman: the point of financial markets is not to make money.  (However, I have enough residual Marxism left to suspect that framing the issue as one of "bad actors" is at least an _analytical_ mistake.  The Marxist argument was that the problem with capitalism wasn't that capitalists were greedy swine; it was that the way capitalism organizes production and exchange forces capitalists to act like greedy swine, on pain of being replaced.  Similarly here; put anyone in those positions and they'll act similarly.  Fortunately Krugman calls for regulation rather than moral uplift.)
]]></description>
<dc:subject>us_politics krugman.paul political_economy financial_speculation</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:ed8510f70085/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:us_politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:political_economy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:financial_speculation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/27/opinion/27krugman.html">
    <title>Op-Ed Columnist - Money for Nothing - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2009-04-27T15:31:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/27/opinion/27krugman.html</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Remember that the gilded Wall Street of 2007 was a fairly new phenomenon. From the 1930s until around 1980 banking was a staid, rather boring business that paid no better, on average, than other industries, yet kept the economy’s wheels turning.  So why did some bankers suddenly begin making vast fortunes? It was, we were told, a reward for their creativity — for financial innovation. At this point, however, it’s hard to think of any major recent financial innovations that actually aided society, as opposed to being new, improved ways to blow bubbles, evade regulations and implement de facto Ponzi schemes.  Consider a recent speech by Ben Bernanke, the Federal Reserve chairman, in which he tried to defend financial innovation. His examples of “good” financial innovations were (1) credit cards — not exactly a new idea; (2) overdraft protection; and (3) subprime mortgages. (I am not making this up.) These were the things for which bankers got paid the big bucks?"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>political_economy finance whats_gone_wrong_with_america financial_crisis_of_2007-- krugman.paul</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:e8b95210a2e8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:political_economy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:finance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:whats_gone_wrong_with_america"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:financial_crisis_of_2007--"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/10/credit-protection-madness/">
    <title>Credit protection madness - Paul Krugman Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-11T00:34:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/10/credit-protection-madness/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Has the risk of a US government default risen? Probably. Nonetheless, the people buying these contracts are crazy. A world in which the US government defaults would be a world in chaos; how likely is it that these contracts would be honored?"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>financial_speculation credit_derivatives krugman.paul financial_crisis_of_2007--</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:06da3dda9b8f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:financial_speculation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:credit_derivatives"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:financial_crisis_of_2007--"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/01/equilibrium-decadence-wonkish/">
    <title>Equilibrium decadence (wonkish) - Paul Krugman Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-01T22:53:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/01/equilibrium-decadence-wonkish/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>macroeconomics economics social_life_of_the_mind our_decrepit_institutions macro_from_micro krugman.paul financial_crisis_of_2007--</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:2d7da28c6f85/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:macroeconomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:social_life_of_the_mind"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:our_decrepit_institutions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:macro_from_micro"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:financial_crisis_of_2007--"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/17/slumps-and-spontaneous-remission-wonkish/">
    <title>Slumps and spontaneous remission (wonkish) - Paul Krugman Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2009-02-17T13:53:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/17/slumps-and-spontaneous-remission-wonkish/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The Keynesian explanation for why depressions don't last forever: "recovery comes because low investment eventually produces a backlog of desired capital stock, through use, delay, and obsolescence. And eventually this leads to an investment recovery, which is self-reinforcing."  --- This suggests a "natural" time-scale for slumps, related to the rate at which the capital stock gets used up.  Probably not enough data to try to to estimate this, though.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>krugman.paul keynes.john_maynard hicks.john macroeconomics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:115adf3f9d55/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:keynes.john_maynard"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:hicks.john"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:macroeconomics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://crookedtimber.org/2009/02/10/are-blogs-ruining-economic-debate/">
    <title>Are blogs ruining economic debate? — Crooked Timber</title>
    <dc:date>2009-02-10T19:06:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/02/10/are-blogs-ruining-economic-debate/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Ans.: No, unless you by 'ruining' you mean "making obvious to non-economists that the debate exists".
]]></description>
<dc:subject>blogging computer_networks_as_provinces_of_the_commonwealth_of_letters economics social_life_of_the_mind policy_analysis_as_a_social_process political_disagreement farrell.henry krugman.paul evisceration crook.clive</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:dde43065ac7b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:computer_networks_as_provinces_of_the_commonwealth_of_letters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:social_life_of_the_mind"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:policy_analysis_as_a_social_process"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:political_disagreement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:farrell.henry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:evisceration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:crook.clive"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/31/another-temporary-misunderstanding/">
    <title>Another temporary misunderstanding - Paul Krugman Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2009-02-01T14:21:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/31/another-temporary-misunderstanding/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Clearly, McArdle hurts America by pretending her MBA lets her comment on economics, and always getting things wrong.  But, as my father says, one must always consider the counterfactuals: perhaps she'd do _more_ harm to America by using her MBA to administer a business.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>economics macroeconomics permanent_income_hypothesis mcardle.megan krugman.paul evisceration</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:e5af1e4049f6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:macroeconomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:permanent_income_hypothesis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:mcardle.megan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:evisceration"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2009/01/a-dark-age-of-macroeconomics.html">
    <title>Economist's View: &quot;A Dark Age of Macroeconomics&quot;</title>
    <dc:date>2009-01-27T20:06:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2009/01/a-dark-age-of-macroeconomics.html</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["One thing I've learned from the current episode is not to automatically trust that the most well-known economists in the field have done due diligence before speaking out on an issue, even when that issue is of great public importance, or even to trust that they've thought very hard about the problems they are speaking to. I used to think that, for the most part, the name brands in the field would live up to their reputations, that they would think hard about problems before speaking out in public, that they would provide clarity and insight, but they haven't. In fact, in many cases they have undermined their reputations and confused the issues. "
]]></description>
<dc:subject>our_decrepit_institutions natural_history_of_truthiness academia economics krugman.paul social_life_of_the_mind macroeconomics thoma.mark</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:23c51f6bb769/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:our_decrepit_institutions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:natural_history_of_truthiness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:social_life_of_the_mind"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:macroeconomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:thoma.mark"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/27/a-dark-age-of-macroeconomics-wonkish/">
    <title>A Dark Age of macroeconomics (wonkish) - Paul Krugman Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2009-01-27T16:31:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/27/a-dark-age-of-macroeconomics-wonkish/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Krugman!  What is best in life?"  "To crush your enemies, drive them before you, and hear the lamentations of their models."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>economics macroeconomics utter_stupidity fama.eugene cochrane.john accounting_identities evisceration krugman.paul</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:29b446872f83/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:macroeconomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:utter_stupidity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:fama.eugene"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:cochrane.john"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:accounting_identities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:evisceration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/25456948/what_obama_must_do/print">
    <title>What Obama Must Do : Krugman</title>
    <dc:date>2009-01-21T13:45:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/25456948/what_obama_must_do/print</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Krugman's long-form take on what Obama should do, domestically, in year 1.  Where do I sign up to help pressure Obama to do all this?

(And, in a "why oh why can't have a better press" moment, why does our leading public intellectual have to publish this in Rolling Stone, of all places?)
]]></description>
<dc:subject>us_politics mortgage_crisis economic_policy political_advice political_economy macroeconomics federal_reserve unions progressive_forces krugman.paul obama.barack corruption our_national_shame the_continuing_crises</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:774b2874b779/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:us_politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:mortgage_crisis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economic_policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:political_advice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:political_economy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:macroeconomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:federal_reserve"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:unions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:progressive_forces"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:obama.barack"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:corruption"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:our_national_shame"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:the_continuing_crises"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/17/an-alternative-economic-strategy/">
    <title>An alternative economic strategy - Paul Krugman Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2009-01-18T01:41:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/17/an-alternative-economic-strategy/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Raising the important historical question: _did_ Baal Mammon take human sacrifices?
]]></description>
<dc:subject>economic_policy human_sacrifice to_encourage_the_others krugman.paul funny:malicious funny:laughing_instead_of_screaming modest_proposals wells.robin</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:c8733d89f880/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economic_policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:human_sacrifice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:to_encourage_the_others"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:funny:malicious"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:funny:laughing_instead_of_screaming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:modest_proposals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:wells.robin"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/19/opinion/19krugman.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=print">
    <title>Op-Ed Columnist - The Madoff Economy - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2008-12-21T22:17:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/19/opinion/19krugman.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=print</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Go read, if you haven't already.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>financialization finance whats_gone_wrong_with_america krugman.paul fraud</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:050c0dbf29d5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:financialization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:finance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:whats_gone_wrong_with_america"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:krugman.paul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:fraud"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>