<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (cshalizi)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from cshalizi</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://news.berkeley.edu/2019/02/28/why-uc-split-with-publishing-giant-elsevier/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.1351"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gowers.wordpress.com/2012/02/26/elseviers-open-letter-point-by-point-and-some-further-arguments/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2012/02/22/elsevier-price-boycotters-untruth/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/2012/02/16/elseviers-sorry-defense-of-the-research-works-act/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2008/11/elsevier-beyond-the-pale-of-scientific-respectability.ars"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://crookedtimber.org/2009/05/04/astroturf-journals/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2008/11/the_case_of_m_s_el_naschie.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://news.berkeley.edu/2019/02/28/why-uc-split-with-publishing-giant-elsevier/">
    <title>Why UC split with publishing giant Elsevier | Berkeley News</title>
    <dc:date>2019-03-08T00:37:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://news.berkeley.edu/2019/02/28/why-uc-split-with-publishing-giant-elsevier/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Alma mater to Elsevier: Drop dead.]]></description>
<dc:subject>academia elsevier why_oh_why_cant_we_have_a_better_academic_publishing_system</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:ce4d58806f5f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:elsevier"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:why_oh_why_cant_we_have_a_better_academic_publishing_system"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.1351">
    <title>[1204.1351] Mathematicians take a stand</title>
    <dc:date>2012-04-09T13:38:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.1351</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["We survey the reasons for the ongoing boycott of the publisher Elsevier. We examine Elsevier's pricing and bundling policies, restrictions on dissemination by authors, and lapses in ethics and peer review, and we conclude with thoughts about the future of mathematical publishing."]]></description>
<dc:subject>to:blog elsevier why_oh_why_cant_we_have_a_better_academic_publishing_system cohn.henry have_read</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:2a9b8704832c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:to:blog"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:elsevier"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:why_oh_why_cant_we_have_a_better_academic_publishing_system"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:cohn.henry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:have_read"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://gowers.wordpress.com/2012/02/26/elseviers-open-letter-point-by-point-and-some-further-arguments/">
    <title>Elsevier’s open letter point by point, and some further arguments « Gowers's Weblog</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-29T18:18:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://gowers.wordpress.com/2012/02/26/elseviers-open-letter-point-by-point-and-some-further-arguments/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>elsevier to:blog</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:c2e7c6e134bd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:elsevier"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:to:blog"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2012/02/22/elsevier-price-boycotters-untruth/">
    <title>Elsevier have a right to price their journals as they see fit, but they must be honest in their reasoning and not attack boycotters with untruths. | Impact of Social Sciences</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-24T00:34:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2012/02/22/elsevier-price-boycotters-untruth/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I therefore have no difficulty in defending Elsevier’s right to price its journals as it sees fit. Equally, I have no difficulty in understanding the decisions of individuals and libraries not to subscribe to Elsevier’s journals. What I strongly dislike is the Chief Executive claiming that the objections of Elsevier’s critics are based on “misstatements or misunderstandings of the fact”. He should be honest and state that in many cases his journals have an element of monopoly power which as a commercial, capitalist company he is determined to exploit as fully as possible. I would respect him were he to say that. For him to claim otherwise is simply false – and as a journal editor it is my job to expose those who speak falsely. That responsibility extends to rejecting comments made by my Journal’s publisher’s Chief Executive, just as much as it extends to rejecting articles that make unsubstantiated and unwarranted claims unsupported by the evidence."]]></description>
<dc:subject>to:blog elsevier economics market_failures_in_everything why_oh_why_cant_we_have_a_better_academic_publishing_system</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:3a3fb53cb69c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:to:blog"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:elsevier"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:market_failures_in_everything"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:why_oh_why_cant_we_have_a_better_academic_publishing_system"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/2012/02/16/elseviers-sorry-defense-of-the-research-works-act/">
    <title>Elsevier’s sorry defense of the Research Works Act « Quomodocumque</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-17T17:20:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/2012/02/16/elseviers-sorry-defense-of-the-research-works-act/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>elsevier why_oh_why_cant_we_have_a_better_academic_publishing_system</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:77ab92cc6257/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:elsevier"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:why_oh_why_cant_we_have_a_better_academic_publishing_system"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2008/11/elsevier-beyond-the-pale-of-scientific-respectability.ars">
    <title>Editorial: publishing economics harm science's credibility - Ars Technica</title>
    <dc:date>2009-05-04T20:42:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2008/11/elsevier-beyond-the-pale-of-scientific-respectability.ars</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["It would be nice to think that Elsevier will listen to scientist [sic], but I suspect that this will not happen until scientists start getting a little more strident. If you are scientist, publish your work in society journals rather than Elsevier journals. Try to avoid citing work published in Elsevier journals. Elsevier lives by a combination of pricing and impact factor, and scientists have direct control over only one of these—impact factor. Librarian could start looking at Elsevier journal usage patterns; perhaps they can follow Cornell's example, and subscribe to just a few Elsevier journals."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>elsevier why_oh_why_cant_we_have_a_better_academic_publishing_system via:?</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:569877e6673a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:elsevier"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:why_oh_why_cant_we_have_a_better_academic_publishing_system"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:via:?"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://crookedtimber.org/2009/05/04/astroturf-journals/">
    <title>Astroturf journals — Crooked Timber</title>
    <dc:date>2009-05-04T12:28:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/05/04/astroturf-journals/</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Merck paid Elsevier to gin up a mock peer reviewed journal pushing Merck's drugs.  I have already given up on providing free labor to Elsevier in the form of refereeing, but now I am contemplating deliberately avoiding citing papers which appear in their journals.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>corruption natural_history_of_truthiness drugs deceiving_us_has_become_an_industrial_process elsevier merck peer_review why_oh_why_cant_we_have_a_better_academic_publishing_system</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:47635c8da14d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:corruption"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:natural_history_of_truthiness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:drugs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:deceiving_us_has_become_an_industrial_process"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:elsevier"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:merck"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:peer_review"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:why_oh_why_cant_we_have_a_better_academic_publishing_system"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2008/11/the_case_of_m_s_el_naschie.html">
    <title>The Case of M. S. El Naschie | The n-Category Café</title>
    <dc:date>2008-11-11T23:46:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2008/11/the_case_of_m_s_el_naschie.html</link>
    <dc:creator>cshalizi</dc:creator><dc:subject>bad_science funny:academic funny:malicious funny:geeky via:nielsen psychoceramica why_oh_why_cant_we_have_a_better_academic_publishing_system physics mathematics numerology elsevier el-maschie.m.s. baez.john_c.</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/b:bf337cff9cbb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:bad_science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:funny:academic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:funny:malicious"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:funny:geeky"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:via:nielsen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:psychoceramica"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:why_oh_why_cant_we_have_a_better_academic_publishing_system"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:physics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:mathematics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:numerology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:elsevier"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:el-maschie.m.s."/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:cshalizi/t:baez.john_c."/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>