<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (coldbrain)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from coldbrain</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2025/02/17/the-editorial-battles-that-made-the-new-yorker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://doodad.dev/dither-me-this/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://lithub.com/against-copyediting-is-it-time-to-abolish-the-department-of-corrections/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.wired.com/story/one-womans-mission-to-rewrite-nazi-history-wikipedia/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.remove.bg/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.themillions.com/2014/02/style-sheet-a-conversation-with-my-copyeditor.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://editorially.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.utexas.edu/opa/blogs/culturalcompass/2012/08/27/jennings/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://lonelysandwich.com/post/7033868135/fcp-the-new-class"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theparisreview.org/interviews/3059/the-art-of-fiction-no-76-raymond-carver"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theparisreview.org/interviews/1931/a-humorist-at-work-fran-lebowitz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/56_of_peoples_1st_wikipedia_edits_are_good.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/news/the-rolling-stone-interview-stanley-kubrick-in-1987-20110307?print=true"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://vimeo.com/videoschool/101"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704243904575630580347359368.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://adactio.com/journal/1709/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://52tiger.net/using-apples-preview-as-an-image-editor/?utm_source=feedburner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gadgetwise.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/27/ten-photo-editing-tips-from-a-pro/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.brownbatterystudios.com/sixthings/category/rapid-fire/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theawl.com/2010/07/what-its-really-like-to-be-a-copy-editor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.goodmorningandgoodnight.com/?p=2530"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/writebetter/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.tnr.com/article/mr-coffee-and-mr-fixit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.aiga.org/content.cfm/how-the-web-made-me-a-better-copywriter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.merriam-webster.com/mw/table/proofrea.htm"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2025/02/17/the-editorial-battles-that-made-the-new-yorker">
    <title>The Editorial Battles That Made The New Yorker</title>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T21:33:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2025/02/17/the-editorial-battles-that-made-the-new-yorker</link>
    <dc:creator>coldbrain</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The magazine has three golden rules: never write about writers, editors, or the magazine. On the occasion of our hundredth anniversary, we’re breaking them all.]]></description>
<dc:subject>newyorker publishing editing media</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/b:7c5ecfa21fac/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:newyorker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:editing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:media"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://doodad.dev/dither-me-this/">
    <title>DOODAD.dev</title>
    <dc:date>2025-05-24T13:39:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://doodad.dev/dither-me-this/</link>
    <dc:creator>coldbrain</dc:creator><dc:subject>images editing tools</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/b:a8126ead0331/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:images"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:editing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:tools"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://lithub.com/against-copyediting-is-it-time-to-abolish-the-department-of-corrections/">
    <title>Against Copyediting: Is It Time to Abolish the Department of Corrections?</title>
    <dc:date>2023-02-11T18:35:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://lithub.com/against-copyediting-is-it-time-to-abolish-the-department-of-corrections/</link>
    <dc:creator>coldbrain</dc:creator><dc:subject>editing writing grammar power politics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/b:b81379b1e499/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:editing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:grammar"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:politics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.wired.com/story/one-womans-mission-to-rewrite-nazi-history-wikipedia/">
    <title>One Woman’s Mission to Rewrite Nazi History on Wikipedia</title>
    <dc:date>2021-09-11T22:15:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.wired.com/story/one-womans-mission-to-rewrite-nazi-history-wikipedia/</link>
    <dc:creator>coldbrain</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Ksenia Coffmanâs fellow editors have called her a vandal and a McCarthyist. She just wants them to stop glorifying fascistsâand start citing better sources.]]></description>
<dc:subject>wikipedia disinformation accuracy editing history secondworldwar nazis historiography</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/b:02f5fa9eeee6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:wikipedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:disinformation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:accuracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:editing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:secondworldwar"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:nazis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:historiography"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.remove.bg/">
    <title>Remove Background from Image – remove.bg</title>
    <dc:date>2018-12-17T17:27:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.remove.bg/</link>
    <dc:creator>coldbrain</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Remove Image Background: 100% automatically – in 5 seconds – without a single click]]></description>
<dc:subject>images editing tools design photography</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/b:785df37eec76/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:images"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:editing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:tools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:photography"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.themillions.com/2014/02/style-sheet-a-conversation-with-my-copyeditor.html">
    <title>The Millions : Style Sheet: A Conversation with My Copyeditor</title>
    <dc:date>2014-02-09T11:22:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.themillions.com/2014/02/style-sheet-a-conversation-with-my-copyeditor.html</link>
    <dc:creator>coldbrain</dc:creator><dc:subject>writing copyediting editing style</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/b:482188c05cdb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:copyediting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:editing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:style"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://editorially.com/">
    <title>Editorially: Write Better</title>
    <dc:date>2013-02-13T20:17:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://editorially.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>coldbrain</dc:creator><dc:subject>tools collaboration writing editing</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/b:cc1347a4a34f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:tools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:editing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.utexas.edu/opa/blogs/culturalcompass/2012/08/27/jennings/">
    <title>Editor recounts working with David Foster Wallace on 1996 U.S. Open piece | Cultural Compass</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-28T15:52:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.utexas.edu/opa/blogs/culturalcompass/2012/08/27/jennings/</link>
    <dc:creator>coldbrain</dc:creator><dc:subject>tennis editing writing david-foster-wallace</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/b:b7bc4ec5c45c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:tennis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:editing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:david-foster-wallace"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://lonelysandwich.com/post/7033868135/fcp-the-new-class">
    <title>lonelysandwich - “Final Cut Pro: The New Class”</title>
    <dc:date>2011-06-29T08:11:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://lonelysandwich.com/post/7033868135/fcp-the-new-class</link>
    <dc:creator>coldbrain</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[According to David Pogue, Apple says they’ve rewritten the app to accommodate changes on the technological landscape. What could these changes possibly be? Could it be that Apple has a very clear and well-rendered vision of the future of video? Could it be that the Apple sees a future where source material is assembled in real time by an engine that works on the viewer side rather than the author side? Where editing is something that happens in process of distribution, and not (as it has always been) well before? Think of this new vision of video as the HTML5 to Flash. Where elements are lightweight and rendered on the fly, rather than pre-baked and packaged into chunky deliverables. I firmly believe that this is Apple’s vision of the future of video and media, and that Final Cut Pro X is a new, bold (ill-timed and hastily executed) flagship to support this vision.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>finalcutpro fcpx video editing future adamlisagor apple distribution</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/b:805718465d49/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:finalcutpro"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:fcpx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:editing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:future"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:adamlisagor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:distribution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theparisreview.org/interviews/3059/the-art-of-fiction-no-76-raymond-carver">
    <title>Paris Review - The Art of Fiction No. 76, Raymond Carver</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-08T13:08:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theparisreview.org/interviews/3059/the-art-of-fiction-no-76-raymond-carver</link>
    <dc:creator>coldbrain</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I write the first draft quickly, as I said. This is most often done in longhand. I simply fill up the pages as rapidly as I can. In some cases, there’s a kind of personal shorthand, notes to myself for what I will do later when I come back to it. Some scenes I have to leave unfinished, unwritten in some cases; the scenes that will require meticulous care later. I mean all of it requires meticulous care—but some scenes I save until the second or third draft, because to do them and do them right would take too much time on the first draft. With the first draft it’s a question of getting down the outline, the scaffolding of the story. Then on subsequent revisions I’ll see to the rest of it. When I’ve finished the longhand draft I’ll type a version of the story and go from there. It always looks different to me, better, of course, after it’s typed up. When I’m typing the first draft, I’ll begin to rewrite and add and delete a little then. The real work comes later, after I’ve done three or four drafts of the story. It’s the same with the poems, only the poems may go through forty or fifty drafts. Donald Hall told me he sometimes writes a hundred or so drafts of his poems. Can you imagine?]]></description>
<dc:subject>raymondcarver theparisreview interviews drafting editing writing</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://instapaper.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/b:00298e8fda1f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:raymondcarver"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:theparisreview"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:interviews"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:drafting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:editing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:writing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theparisreview.org/interviews/1931/a-humorist-at-work-fran-lebowitz">
    <title>Paris Review - A Humorist at Work, Fran Lebowitz</title>
    <dc:date>2011-04-30T19:33:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theparisreview.org/interviews/1931/a-humorist-at-work-fran-lebowitz</link>
    <dc:creator>coldbrain</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I used to love to write. As a child I used to write all the time. I loved to write up until the second I got my first professional writing job. It turns out it’s not that I hate to write. I hate, simply, to work. I just hate to work, period. I am profoundly slothful. Practically inert. I have no energy. I never have. I just have no desire to be productive. Now that I realize I don’t hate to write, that I just hate to work, it makes writing easier.]]></description>
<dc:subject>franlebowitz writing career work editing humour interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://instapaper.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/b:bb914859a964/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:franlebowitz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:career"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:editing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:humour"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:interviews"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/56_of_peoples_1st_wikipedia_edits_are_good.php">
    <title>56% of Peoples' 1st Wikipedia Edits Are Good</title>
    <dc:date>2011-04-19T10:50:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/56_of_peoples_1st_wikipedia_edits_are_good.php</link>
    <dc:creator>coldbrain</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[If you thought Wikipedia had seen its heyday, you'd have thought wrong. A small study performed by Wikipedia staff and published today found that new Editors are signing up and making edits to the site at a far greater rate than they were years ago. A slight majority of their first edits are acceptable or better.]]></description>
<dc:subject>wikipedia editing accuracy quality</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/b:29c4b4069399/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:wikipedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:editing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:accuracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:quality"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/news/the-rolling-stone-interview-stanley-kubrick-in-1987-20110307?print=true">
    <title>The Rolling Stone Interview: Stanley Kubrick in 1987 | Rolling Stone Culture</title>
    <dc:date>2011-04-03T11:21:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/news/the-rolling-stone-interview-stanley-kubrick-in-1987-20110307?print=true</link>
    <dc:creator>coldbrain</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[You’ve quoted Pudovkin to the effect that editing is the only original and unique art form in film.
I think so. Everything else comes from something else. Writing, of course, is writing, acting comes from the theater, and cinematography comes from photography. Editing is unique to film. You can see something from different points of view almost simultaneously, and it creates a new experience.]]></description>
<dc:subject>stanleykubrick film cinema editing fullmetaljacket process perfectionism 1987 interviews</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://instapaper.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/b:a73a0caa5b59/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:stanleykubrick"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:film"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:cinema"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:editing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:fullmetaljacket"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:process"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:perfectionism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:1987"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:interviews"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://vimeo.com/videoschool/101">
    <title>Video 101 on Vimeo Video School</title>
    <dc:date>2011-02-01T20:02:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://vimeo.com/videoschool/101</link>
    <dc:creator>coldbrain</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Are you curious about how to make videos but can't tell a camcorder from a coffee maker? Do the terms 'pan' and 'tilt' conjour up thoughts of tv cooking shows instead of movie making terminology? Or maybe you're tired of always being the audience member and want to start making videos yourself? Well look no further, Video 101 is here! Join the friendly Vimeo Staff as we cover all the basics of shooting and editing videos you can be proud of. We've handcrafted these lessons for beginners of all backgrounds, check it out!]]></description>
<dc:subject>video tutorial editing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/b:c66c2d400070/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:tutorial"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:editing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704243904575630580347359368.html">
    <title>Ayelet Waldman, Author of Bad Mother and Red Hook Road, on Writing Well - WSJ.com</title>
    <dc:date>2010-12-30T10:12:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704243904575630580347359368.html</link>
    <dc:creator>coldbrain</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Though you won't find it in Webster's, there's a word to describe the kind of meticulously constructed writing that bores even its author. A "bore-geous" novel is one that is packed with gorgeous, finely wrought descriptions of places and people, with entire paragraphs extolling the slope of one character's nose, whole chapters describing another's perambulations through a city. These novels are often historical or set in foreign lands, their bore-geousness inspired by the author's anxiety about making an unfamiliar world feel convincing and true. It's not that the sentences aren't well-constructed, even lovely. They are. That's part of the problem. Bore-geousness happens when you are writing beautifully but pointlessly.]]></description>
<dc:subject>writing editing ayeletwaldman descriptions</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/b:9ffc55387147/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:editing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:ayeletwaldman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:descriptions"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://adactio.com/journal/1709/">
    <title>Adactio: Journal—Drafty</title>
    <dc:date>2010-11-15T09:30:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://adactio.com/journal/1709/</link>
    <dc:creator>coldbrain</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I think keeping drafts can be counterproductive. The problem is that, once something is a draft rather than a blog post, it’s likely to stay a draft and never become a blog post. And the longer something stays in draft, the less likely it is to ever see the light of day.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>blogging drafting workflow publishing editing writing via:robertogreco</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/b:b09cffb5b2ea/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:drafting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:workflow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:editing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:via:robertogreco"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://52tiger.net/using-apples-preview-as-an-image-editor/?utm_source=feedburner">
    <title>52 Tiger » Using Apple’s Preview as an image editor</title>
    <dc:date>2010-11-03T08:26:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://52tiger.net/using-apples-preview-as-an-image-editor/?utm_source=feedburner</link>
    <dc:creator>coldbrain</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Recently I was looking for a lightweight image editor. After auditioning great candidates like Acorn and Pixelmator, I realized that Apple’s own Preview offers nearly everything I need. Here’s why and how I’m using Apple’s built-in PDF file viewer.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple mac osx preview image editing cropping resizing workflow</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/b:56339104dcd5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:mac"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:osx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:preview"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:image"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:editing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:cropping"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:resizing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:workflow"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://gadgetwise.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/27/ten-photo-editing-tips-from-a-pro/">
    <title>Ten Photo-Editing Tips From a Pro - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2010-10-14T13:06:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://gadgetwise.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/27/ten-photo-editing-tips-from-a-pro/</link>
    <dc:creator>coldbrain</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[But I don’t have many tricks in my Lightroom photo-doctoring bag. In fact, everything I was doing I had learned from a brief demonstration by Tyler Stableford, an outdoor sports and adventure photographer who uses Lightroom to make his photos just a bit more dazzling.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>photography photoshop editing lightroom tutorial howto adobe resources</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/b:5a4010268256/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:photography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:photoshop"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:editing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:lightroom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:tutorial"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:howto"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:adobe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:resources"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.brownbatterystudios.com/sixthings/category/rapid-fire/">
    <title>Rapid Fire « SixThings</title>
    <dc:date>2010-09-23T16:22:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.brownbatterystudios.com/sixthings/category/rapid-fire/</link>
    <dc:creator>coldbrain</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Quick Fireworks tutorials
]]></description>
<dc:subject>fireworks editing image nesltd adobe graphics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/b:5f236dda505c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:fireworks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:editing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:image"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:nesltd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:adobe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:graphics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theawl.com/2010/07/what-its-really-like-to-be-a-copy-editor">
    <title>What It's Really Like To Be A Copy Editor - The Awl</title>
    <dc:date>2010-08-18T19:33:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theawl.com/2010/07/what-its-really-like-to-be-a-copy-editor</link>
    <dc:creator>coldbrain</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The word is douche bag. Douche space bag. People will insist that it’s one closed-up word—douchebag—but they are wrong. When you cite the dictionary as proof of the division, they will tell you that the entry refers to a product women use to clean themselves and not the guy who thinks it’s impressive to drop $300 on a bottle of vodka. You will calmly point out that, actually, the definition in Merriam-Webster is “an unattractive or offensive person” and not a reference to Summer’s Eve. They will then choose to ignore you and write it as one word anyway.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>copyediting writing web language journalism online publishing english grammar editing content</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/b:8035ec6c49c9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:copyediting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:english"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:grammar"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:editing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:content"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.goodmorningandgoodnight.com/?p=2530">
    <title>Write drunk; edit sober. - Goodmorning &amp; Goodnight</title>
    <dc:date>2010-08-07T22:18:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.goodmorningandgoodnight.com/?p=2530</link>
    <dc:creator>coldbrain</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[RT @Dabydenko: I've never liked hemingway - give me steinbeck every day. But in four simple words, I'm inspired http://bit.ly/bp225U
]]></description>
<dc:subject>ernesthemingway writing editing idioms advice</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/b:38d4a194b464/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:ernesthemingway"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:editing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:idioms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:advice"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/writebetter/">
    <title>A List Apart: Articles: How to Write a Better Weblog</title>
    <dc:date>2010-05-30T16:36:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.alistapart.com/articles/writebetter/</link>
    <dc:creator>coldbrain</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["There’s been a recent retread of the weblogging phenomenon following a few articles at PC Mag, Time, and The Morning News. After posting my own short list of things that ought to be banned from weblogs, I realized that a list of things to be encouraged would be more useful. Some people are new to weblogging. Others want to raise the bar. In the end, everybody wants better sites, and some of these suggestions might help."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>advice blogging editing writing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/b:629316dcec57/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:advice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:editing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:writing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.tnr.com/article/mr-coffee-and-mr-fixit">
    <title>Mr. Coffee And Mr. Fixit | The New Republic</title>
    <dc:date>2010-03-27T12:19:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.tnr.com/article/mr-coffee-and-mr-fixit</link>
    <dc:creator>coldbrain</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Just how much of Carver's spare writing style was down to him, and how much was his editor, Gordon Lish?
]]></description>
<dc:subject>raymondcarver writing editing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/b:4cacdcc7e0ef/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:raymondcarver"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:editing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.aiga.org/content.cfm/how-the-web-made-me-a-better-copywriter">
    <title>How the Web Made Me a Better Copywriter — AIGA | the professional association for design</title>
    <dc:date>2009-11-12T10:23:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.aiga.org/content.cfm/how-the-web-made-me-a-better-copywriter</link>
    <dc:creator>coldbrain</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In 1999, when I left a staff job at a newspaper to start my own copywriting business, I never even thought about writing for the web. A decade later, most of my work consists of web projects. It struck me recently that this medium has led me to develop a different way of writing—tighter, simpler, more transparent. The results, I believe, are greater clarity and persuasiveness, and a speedier, more user-friendly read."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>copywriting online writing internet editing blogging journalism web</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/b:b61cba28e2e7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:copywriting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:editing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:web"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.merriam-webster.com/mw/table/proofrea.htm">
    <title>Proofreaders' Marks</title>
    <dc:date>2009-08-07T11:06:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.merriam-webster.com/mw/table/proofrea.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>coldbrain</dc:creator><dc:subject>typography writing proofreading marks editing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/b:96bb5583758d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:typography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:proofreading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:marks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:coldbrain/t:editing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>