<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (blech)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from blech</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.plos.org/toothandclaw/2012/02/09/their-so-called-journalism-or-what-i-saw-at-the-womens-mags/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/07/10/pictures-are-supposed-to-be-worth-a-thousand-words/"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://blogs.plos.org/toothandclaw/2012/02/09/their-so-called-journalism-or-what-i-saw-at-the-womens-mags/">
    <title>Their So-Called Journalism, or What I Saw at the Women’s Mags | Tooth and Claw</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-11T23:00:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.plos.org/toothandclaw/2012/02/09/their-so-called-journalism-or-what-i-saw-at-the-womens-mags/</link>
    <dc:creator>blech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I contacted a friend of a friend, a smart and lovely editor at a high-profile women’s magazine that from time to time runs articles about strong women doing worthwhile work. Her reply was quick, honest, and upsetting: The magazine couldn’t tackle the palm oil issue head on, because half its advertisers were beauty companies guilty of destroying the very same forests."]]></description>
<dc:subject>politics economics business journalism truth</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://instapaper.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/b:8bfc44af5e34/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:truth"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/07/10/pictures-are-supposed-to-be-worth-a-thousand-words/">
    <title>Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire | NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-02T04:19:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/07/10/pictures-are-supposed-to-be-worth-a-thousand-words/</link>
    <dc:creator>blech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Pictures are supposed to be worth a thousand words. But a picture unaccompanied by words may not mean anything at all. Do pictures provide evidence? And if so, evidence of what? And, of course, the underlying question: do they tell the truth?" Worth a read. From 2007.]]></description>
<dc:subject>nytimes photography truth news</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://instapaper.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/b:53324bcf77db/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:nytimes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:photography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:truth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:news"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>