<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (blech)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from blech</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.rebeccablood.net/archive/2010/06/a_slow_web.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thenewinquiry.com/blogs/zunguzungu/david-graebers-debt-my-first-5000-words/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/15/opinion/sunday/the-rise-of-the-new-groupthink.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=all"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://www.rebeccablood.net/archive/2010/06/a_slow_web.html">
    <title>The Slow Web | Rebecca Blood</title>
    <dc:date>2012-04-01T03:28:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.rebeccablood.net/archive/2010/06/a_slow_web.html</link>
    <dc:creator>blech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The Slow Web would be more like a book, retaining many of the elements of the Popular Web, but unhurried, re-considered, additive. Research would no longer be restricted to rapid responders. Conclusions would be intentionally postponed until sufficiently noodled-with. Writers could budget sufficient dream-time before setting pixel to page. Fresh thinking would no longer have to happen in real time." An interesting addition to Robin Sloan's essay Fish.]]></description>
<dc:subject>internet web criticism thought</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://instapaper.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/b:010f8bb5c5fc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:thought"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thenewinquiry.com/blogs/zunguzungu/david-graebers-debt-my-first-5000-words/">
    <title>David Graeber’s Debt: My First 5,000 Words | The New Inquiry</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-28T03:28:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://thenewinquiry.com/blogs/zunguzungu/david-graebers-debt-my-first-5000-words/</link>
    <dc:creator>blech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Aaron Bady's fantastic review of a book examining debt: 'It’s an invitation to read the world differently, to see different possiblities in the here and now, and to argue not only that “another world is possible,” as the slogan/cliché has it, but that other worlds are present.' It's now on my (growing) reading list.]]></description>
<dc:subject>economics debt review book culture thought via:migurski</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/b:b7075fdcc0a9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:debt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:review"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:book"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:thought"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:via:migurski"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/15/opinion/sunday/the-rise-of-the-new-groupthink.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=all">
    <title>The Rise of the New Groupthink | NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2012-01-16T07:21:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/15/opinion/sunday/the-rise-of-the-new-groupthink.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=all</link>
    <dc:creator>blech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Solitude is out of fashion. Our companies, our schools and our culture are in thrall to an idea I call the New Groupthink, which holds that creativity and achievement come from an oddly gregarious place."]]></description>
<dc:subject>nytimes work employment productivity creativity thought office design workplace</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://instapaper.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/b:78ec1acc05b8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:nytimes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:employment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:productivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:creativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:thought"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:workplace"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>