<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (blech)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from blech</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/12/i-got-myself-arrested-so-i-could-look-inside-the-justice-system/282360/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.bicycling.com/blogs/roadrights/2013/10/29/theres-another-way/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://waxy.org/2011/12/no_copyright_intended/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJH9F7Hcluo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ftrain.com/nanolaw.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/dec/15/public-space-private-property-companies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8340276.stm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.economist.com/opinion/displayStory.cfm?story_id=14164614"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/robertpeston/2009/07/news_of_the_world_bugged_sun_e.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2009/06/crimes-of-james-von-brunn-and-marcus.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/may/31/simon-singh-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.economist.com/members/persona.cfm?econuid=3263034"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jackofkent.blogspot.com/2009/05/bca-v-singh-astonishingly-illiberal.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.economist.com/research/articlesBySubject/displayStory.cfm?story_id=13496729"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00ft5kp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/edinburgh_and_east/7651107.stm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://washcycle.typepad.com/home/2008/07/the-myth-of-the.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.oblomovka.com/wp/2008/08/07/copyright-fraud-and-window-taxes-no-not-that-windows/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.lrb.co.uk/v30/n03/runc01_.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6677589.stm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sirimo.co.uk/media/UKPhotographersRights.pdf"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/12/i-got-myself-arrested-so-i-could-look-inside-the-justice-system/282360/">
    <title>I Got Myself Arrested So I Could Look Inside the Justice System | The Atlantic</title>
    <dc:date>2013-12-19T23:59:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/12/i-got-myself-arrested-so-i-could-look-inside-the-justice-system/282360/</link>
    <dc:creator>blech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Bobby Constantino: "In between the important cases, I found myself spending most of my time prosecuting people of color for things we white kids did with impunity growing up in the suburbs. As our office handed down arrest records and probation terms for riding dirt bikes in the street, cutting through a neighbor’s yard, hosting loud parties, fighting, or smoking weed – shenanigans that had rarely earned my own classmates anything more than raised eyebrows and scoldings – I often wondered if there was a side of the justice system that we never saw in the suburbs. Last year, I got myself arrested in New York City and found out." Depressing but necessary reading.]]></description>
<dc:subject>us politics justice law graffiti race racism newyorkcity probation</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/b:b9753c2af83d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:justice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:graffiti"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:race"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:racism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:newyorkcity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:probation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.bicycling.com/blogs/roadrights/2013/10/29/theres-another-way/">
    <title>Road Rights - There's Another Way | Bicycling.com</title>
    <dc:date>2013-11-10T03:11:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.bicycling.com/blogs/roadrights/2013/10/29/theres-another-way/</link>
    <dc:creator>blech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[On the Dutch approach to blame in cycle collisions. I like this.]]></description>
<dc:subject>cycling politics transport netherlands law</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://twitter.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/b:17f796077dfc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:cycling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:transport"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:netherlands"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:law"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://waxy.org/2011/12/no_copyright_intended/">
    <title>No Copyright Intended | Waxy.org</title>
    <dc:date>2011-12-09T21:09:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://waxy.org/2011/12/no_copyright_intended/</link>
    <dc:creator>blech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Remix culture is the new Prohibition, with massive media companies as the lone voices calling for temperance. You can criminalize commonplace activities from law-abiding people, but eventually, something has to give."]]></description>
<dc:subject>copyright copyfight ip youtube future law video music mp3 via:deusx</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/b:4c1a219cee76/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:copyfight"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:ip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:youtube"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:future"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:music"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:mp3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:via:deusx"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJH9F7Hcluo">
    <title>‪Stand Your Ground‬‏ | YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-22T16:18:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJH9F7Hcluo</link>
    <dc:creator>blech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["On Tuesday 21 June 2011 six photographers were assigned different areas of the City to photograph. Some used tripods, some went hand held, one set up a 5 x 4. All were instructed to keep to public land and photograph the area as they would on a normal day." "All six photographers were stopped on at least one occasion. Three encounters led to police action."]]></description>
<dc:subject>video london photography police law securitytheatre via:tomtaylor</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/b:aa1a5270d74e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:london"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:photography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:police"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:securitytheatre"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:via:tomtaylor"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.ftrain.com/nanolaw.html">
    <title>Nanolaw with Daughter (Ftrain.com)</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-17T16:02:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ftrain.com/nanolaw.html</link>
    <dc:creator>blech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A story about privacy, law, the internet, and the future. Go and read it (if you haven't already).]]></description>
<dc:subject>technology culture law internet sciencefiction shortstory</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://instapaper.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/b:aa81d1b20bed/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:sciencefiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:shortstory"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/dec/15/public-space-private-property-companies">
    <title>Cities within cities are eating up Britain's streets | The Guardian</title>
    <dc:date>2009-12-16T12:40:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/dec/15/public-space-private-property-companies</link>
    <dc:creator>blech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Anna Minton in the Guardian: "Urban regeneration has seen entire districts pass into the hands of private companies – and their security guards". Most of the recent photography horror stories seem to start with a jobsworth security guard getting annoyed with someone taking a picture of a building, which should be legal, but in these half-private spaces, isn't.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>guardian comment cities publicspace photography law urbanism</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/b:eae4b3f9bd51/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:guardian"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:comment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:cities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:publicspace"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:photography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:urbanism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8340276.stm">
    <title>Carbolic smoke ball: fake or cure? | BBC News</title>
    <dc:date>2009-11-11T20:59:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8340276.stm</link>
    <dc:creator>blech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The curious case of the carbolic smoke ball forced companies to treat customers honestly and openly and still has impact today." On why a quack cure still influences our law.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>bbc news radio4 programme advertising law victorian london</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/b:a15680bdb7e0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:bbc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:news"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:radio4"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:programme"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:advertising"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:victorian"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:london"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.economist.com/opinion/displayStory.cfm?story_id=14164614">
    <title>Sex laws: Unjust and ineffective | The Economist</title>
    <dc:date>2009-08-08T12:34:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.economist.com/opinion/displayStory.cfm?story_id=14164614</link>
    <dc:creator>blech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[If you wanted to come up with an example of how democracy and "transparency" could work together to end up with something utterly dystopian, you'd have to work hard to try harder than the US system of sex offender registries, detailed in this depressing, but good, Economist article. (Of course, the UK is rapidly following it. Sigh.)
]]></description>
<dc:subject>economist us transparency democracy politics sexuality law</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/b:68ed19ec5886/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:economist"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:transparency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:sexuality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:law"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/robertpeston/2009/07/news_of_the_world_bugged_sun_e.html">
    <title>News of the World bugged Sun editor | BBC - Peston's Picks</title>
    <dc:date>2009-07-10T11:54:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/robertpeston/2009/07/news_of_the_world_bugged_sun_e.html</link>
    <dc:creator>blech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Robert Peston on the wider journalistic practices behind the NOTW phone conversation affair. "In a series of reports and in evidence to the House of Commons culture, media and sport committee, [the retiring information commissioner] made a series of disclosures about newspaper activities that he regarded as "prima facie" illegal."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>newspapers journalism sun bbc law</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/b:4186b6a9b470/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:newspapers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:sun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:bbc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:law"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2009/06/crimes-of-james-von-brunn-and-marcus.html">
    <title>The Crimes Of Marcus Epstein | Unqualified Reservations</title>
    <dc:date>2009-07-10T11:52:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2009/06/crimes-of-james-von-brunn-and-marcus.html</link>
    <dc:creator>blech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The New York Times, via its reporters acting as proxies, steals documents. It violates laws that everyone else must follow. It uses the information in these documents to sell newspapers, and profits by it. And most important, it uses this process to exercise political power [..] The fact that the Times may commit this class of crime with impunity, while I can't and you can't, enables it (with the true press, of course, as a whole) to act as almost a sovereign force. [..] This is considered a normal and ethical practice in early 21st-century journalism. It is actually a criminal practice, which any other century would recognize as such." (Title shortened for space.)
]]></description>
<dc:subject>newspapers journalism law via:jerakeen</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/b:ecfdbb5cb4f1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:newspapers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:via:jerakeen"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/may/31/simon-singh-science">
    <title>Why are they trying to gag a science writer? | The Observer</title>
    <dc:date>2009-05-31T16:13:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/may/31/simon-singh-science</link>
    <dc:creator>blech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A good Nick Cohen opinion piece on the Simon Singh case, concluding with the rallying cry that "the greatest threat to freedom of speech in Britain is not the state or the security services or the press barons, but a fusty and illiberal legal system, which has become a public menace".
]]></description>
<dc:subject>uk guardian news science media law censorship chiropractic</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/b:2f2bf8010923/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:guardian"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:news"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:censorship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:chiropractic"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.economist.com/members/persona.cfm?econuid=3263034">
    <title>Evan Harris | The Economist</title>
    <dc:date>2009-05-17T18:20:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.economist.com/members/persona.cfm?econuid=3263034</link>
    <dc:creator>blech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Comments by Evan Harris; the only one at the time of posting is on the subject of the Simon Singh vs BCA case.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>science law uk criticism comment</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/b:371d461ecd47/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:comment"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jackofkent.blogspot.com/2009/05/bca-v-singh-astonishingly-illiberal.html">
    <title>BCA v Singh: An Astonishingly Illiberal Ruling | Jack of Kent</title>
    <dc:date>2009-05-17T18:14:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://jackofkent.blogspot.com/2009/05/bca-v-singh-astonishingly-illiberal.html</link>
    <dc:creator>blech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I'd been blissfully unaware of this until this weekend, when the New Scientist and Economist both covered it, but this is perhaps the best summary I've seen of a ridiculous legal ruling on a piece Simon Singh wrote in the Guardian about chiropratic treatments of illnesses in babies.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>uk law science health criticism guardian</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/b:f3859737b48b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:health"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:guardian"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.economist.com/research/articlesBySubject/displayStory.cfm?story_id=13496729">
    <title>Trois strikes and you're out | The Economist</title>
    <dc:date>2009-04-18T10:24:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.economist.com/research/articlesBySubject/displayStory.cfm?story_id=13496729</link>
    <dc:creator>blech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Mr Sarkozy is determined to push [the 'three strikes' law] through parliament later this month. He first met his wife, Carla Bruni, a musician who has supported the law, at a presentation of a report on internet piracy by Denis Olivennes, former boss of Fnac, a retailer. Mr Olivennes’s report led directly to the HADOPI law."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>economist france copyright law parliament</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/b:b598ddfe4fad/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:economist"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:france"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:parliament"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00ft5kp">
    <title>The Draftsman's Contract, Episode 1 | BBC Radio 4</title>
    <dc:date>2008-12-11T08:31:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00ft5kp</link>
    <dc:creator>blech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Shaun Ley examines the work of the people who actually write our country's legislation - the Parliamentary draftsmen - and whether laws should be gender-neutral, simpler and fewer." I know it's easy to draw parallels between law and code, but there were moments in this short radio show when it was unavoidable.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>politics law uk civilservice bbc radio4 programme speechification</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/b:6feadcc30fe8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:civilservice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:bbc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:radio4"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:programme"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:speechification"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/edinburgh_and_east/7651107.stm">
    <title>Man fined for taking photograph | BBC News</title>
    <dc:date>2008-10-04T21:07:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/edinburgh_and_east/7651107.stm</link>
    <dc:creator>blech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['Sebastian Przygodzki took a photograph with his camera, which upset Rebecca Smith and her friends called police ... Sheriff Kenneth Hogg said the matter "could be best described as exceptionally unchivalrous"'. Hence a £100 fine for "breach of the peace", one of those handy UK "anything can be illegal" laws.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>photography news bbc law privacy via:jerakeen</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/b:08043189b0b8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:photography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:news"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:bbc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:via:jerakeen"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://washcycle.typepad.com/home/2008/07/the-myth-of-the.html">
    <title>The Myth of the Scofflaw Cyclist | TheWashCycle</title>
    <dc:date>2008-08-10T09:26:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://washcycle.typepad.com/home/2008/07/the-myth-of-the.html</link>
    <dc:creator>blech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A really good post noting that "there is nothing unique about the frequency with which cyclists as a class break the law when compared with drivers" which goes on to explain what drivers also do and why cyclists make the decisions they often do.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>cycling politics law comment urbanism via:migurski</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/b:741ae01b63e7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:cycling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:comment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:urbanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:via:migurski"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.oblomovka.com/wp/2008/08/07/copyright-fraud-and-window-taxes-no-not-that-windows/">
    <title>Copyright, Fraud and Window Taxes | Oblomovka</title>
    <dc:date>2008-08-08T06:06:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.oblomovka.com/wp/2008/08/07/copyright-fraud-and-window-taxes-no-not-that-windows/</link>
    <dc:creator>blech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Danny O’Brien is really on form in his fresh burst of sponsored blogging, and this is a great post. "her confusion comes from two very separate matters that get blurred in the idea of 'intellectual property': copying as the tapping point for revenue redistribution, and correct attribution and sourcing as a side-effect of that".
]]></description>
<dc:subject>copyright attribution attention politics culture law</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/b:a1eecdf539e2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:attribution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:law"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.lrb.co.uk/v30/n03/runc01_.html">
    <title>David Runciman: This Way to the Ruin | LRB</title>
    <dc:date>2008-02-27T13:46:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.lrb.co.uk/v30/n03/runc01_.html</link>
    <dc:creator>blech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A long but worthwhile post on Britain's constitution, considering election timing, the EU, civil service, local government, the character of PMs, devolution, and finally, the prospects for codifying the constitution before a crisis.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>uk politics books review lrb history law democracy londonreviewofbooks</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/b:7d90ebe339c5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:review"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:lrb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:londonreviewofbooks"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6677589.stm">
    <title>BBC News | London | Police win power to ban bike ride</title>
    <dc:date>2007-05-21T16:35:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6677589.stm</link>
    <dc:creator>blech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Appeal Court overturns the High Court's decision two to one, and say that Critical Mass must give notice of their route before it's allowed.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>london bicycle culture politics travel law</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/b:09095de15a0a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:london"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:bicycle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:travel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:law"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sirimo.co.uk/media/UKPhotographersRights.pdf">
    <title>UKPhotographersRights PDF</title>
    <dc:date>2006-09-26T09:44:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.sirimo.co.uk/media/UKPhotographersRights.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>blech</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Taking photos of people in a public place is probably neither an infringement of privacy nor harassment, but international sales rights may be harmed without a model release. Apparently.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>photography uk law pdf</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:blech/b:cb899970c736/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:photography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:blech/t:pdf"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>