<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (bgporter)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:bgporter/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from bgporter</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cdsmith.twu.net/types.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://cdsmith.twu.net/types.html">
    <title>What To Know Before Debating Type Systems</title>
    <dc:date>2007-06-30T12:09:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://cdsmith.twu.net/types.html</link>
    <dc:creator>bgporter</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I would be willing to place a bet that most computer programmers have, on multiple occasions, expressed an opinion about the desirability of certain kinds of type systems in programming languages. Contrary to popular conception, that's a great thing! Prog
]]></description>
<dc:subject>programming types</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:bgporter/b:79c455836318/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:bgporter/t:programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:bgporter/t:types"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>