<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (bgporter)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:bgporter/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from bgporter</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.miltonglaser.com/pages/milton/essays/es3.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://www.miltonglaser.com/pages/milton/essays/es3.html">
    <title>http://www.miltonglaser.com/pages/milton/essays/es3.html</title>
    <dc:date>2009-05-04T21:02:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.miltonglaser.com/pages/milton/essays/es3.html</link>
    <dc:creator>bgporter</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[If you look at a Persian rug, you cannot say that less is more because you realise that every part of that rug, every change of colour, every shift in form is absolutely essential for its aesthetic success. You cannot prove to me that a solid blue rug is in any way superior. That also goes for the work of Gaudi, Persian miniatures, art nouveau and everything else. However, I have an alternative to the proposition that I believe is more appropriate. ‘Just enough is more.’
]]></description>
<dc:subject>philosophy career</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:bgporter/b:4267b0375f63/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:bgporter/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:bgporter/t:career"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>