<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (bgporter)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:bgporter/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from bgporter</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.eskimo.com/~billb/wing/airfoil.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://www.eskimo.com/~billb/wing/airfoil.html">
    <title>The Airfoil Misconception in K-6 Textbooks</title>
    <dc:date>2010-02-15T18:20:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.eskimo.com/~billb/wing/airfoil.html</link>
    <dc:creator>bgporter</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[HOW DO AIRPLANE WINGS *REALLY* WORK?

Amazingly enough, this question is still argued in many places, from elementary school classrooms all the way up to major pilot schools, and even in the engineering departments of major aircraft companies. This is unexpected, since we would assume that aircraft physics was completely explored early this century.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>aerodynamics bernoulli skeptic</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:bgporter/b:0e61b7f3b726/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:bgporter/t:aerodynamics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:bgporter/t:bernoulli"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:bgporter/t:skeptic"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>