<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (arthegall)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from arthegall</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/the-press-release-crime-of-a-biotech-ceo-and-its-impact-on-scientific-research/2013/09/23/9b4a1a32-007a-11e3-9a3e-916de805f65d_story.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-32621-w"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.upress.pitt.edu/BookDetails.aspx?bookId=36600"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/29/opinion/sunday/artificial-intelligence-is-stuck-heres-how-to-move-it-forward.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://courses.media.mit.edu/2004spring/mas966/rosenblueth_1943.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://osf.io/gvm2z/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002106"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pitt.edu/~pittcntr/Events/All/Conferences/others/other_conf_2014-15/04-10-15_diagrams/diagrams-cfp.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.thegrandlocus.com/static/misc/is_the_scientific_paper_fraudulent.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://twitter.com/OpposingThumb/status/486201689759027200"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://wjh.harvard.edu/~jmitchel/writing/failed_science.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2014/jun/05/stretch-genes/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jakevdp.github.io/blog/2013/10/26/big-data-brain-drain/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://idlewords.com/2010/03/scott_and_scurvy.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/adap-org/9910002"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://caseybergman.wordpress.com/2013/08/04/on-the-30th-anniversary-of-dna-sequencing-in-population-genetics/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://nautil.us/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bahfest.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pegasus.isi.edu/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://erlichya.tumblr.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1302.6906"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/06/health/global-partners-agree-on-sharing-trove-of-genetic-data.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sciencemag.org/content/340/6134/814.full"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://mikethemadbiologist.com/2013/06/03/maybe-we-should-give-up-on-peer-review-and-just-dump-everything-in-arxiv/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/2013/02/05/successful-predictions-of-climate-science/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://madhadron.com/?p=263"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-24/the-sad-state-of-our-science-and-how-to-fix-it.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature11875.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nature.com/news/price-doesn-t-always-buy-prestige-in-open-access-1.12259"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/2013/01/05/do-we-really-underestimate-how-much-well-change-or-absolute-value-is-not-linear/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crime/review-of-fbi-forensics-does-not-extend-to-federally-trained-state-local-examiners/2012/12/22/b7ef9c2e-4965-11e2-ad54-580638ede391_story.html?wpisrc=al_excl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.contra-versus.net/uploads/6/7/3/6/6736569/feyerabend_-_realism_rationalism_and_scientific_method_-_philosophical_papers_vol_1.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phylogenomics.blogspot.com/2012/12/great-ideas-in-this-plosone-paper.html?spref=tw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://phylogenomics.blogspot.com/2012/12/great-ideas-in-this-plosone-paper.html#.UNMtDnwcoTo.twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sciencemag.org/content/333/6046/1157.short"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/08/03/jonah-lehrer-ted-and-the-narrative-dark-arts/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sciencemadness.org/library/books/ignition.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.ipscell.com/2012/06/the-scientists-guide-to-insulting-other-scientists-elephant-in-the-lab-series/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://andrewgelman.com/2012/04/systematic-review-of-publication-bias-in-studies-on-publication-bias/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions#!/petition/require-free-access-over-internet-scientific-journal-articles-arising-taxpayer-funded-research/wDX82FLQ"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=3957"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pipeline.corante.com/archives/2012/04/25/dhfr_inhibitors_revisited_a_word_from_the_authors_and_reviewers.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cscs.umich.edu/~crshalizi/weblog/698.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=12054"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://openprovenance.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/primer/Primer.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S153204640300011X"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.fuzzierlogic.com/archives/461"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/12/361"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nature.com/msb/journal/v7/n1/full/msb201177.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.michaeleisen.org/blog/?p=572"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://isatab.sourceforge.net/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1010.1092"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/es702969f"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2011Jun/0127.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://knowledgeblog.org/knowledgeblog-arrayexpress"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nature.com/nrd/journal/v1/n9/full/nrd892.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://odontomachus.wordpress.com/2011/05/04/crossrefs-gift-of-metadata/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.orcid.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/projects/sagecite/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://iospress.metapress.com/content/ftkh21q50t521wm2/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://datadryad.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://robjhyndman.com/researchtips/authorship/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://projecteuclid.org/DPubS?service=UI&amp;version=1.0&amp;verb=Display&amp;handle=euclid.ss/1177013012"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://projectreporter.nih.gov/exporter/default.aspx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01182.x/abstract"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.taverna.org.uk/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/sra/sra.cgi?sample=ERS000018"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://afinetheorem.wordpress.com/2010/09/27/intellectual-property-rights-and-innovation-evidence-from-the-human-genome-h-williams-2010/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/the-lay-scientist/2010/sep/24/1"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/the-press-release-crime-of-a-biotech-ceo-and-its-impact-on-scientific-research/2013/09/23/9b4a1a32-007a-11e3-9a3e-916de805f65d_story.html">
    <title>The press-release conviction of a biotech CEO and its impact on scientific research - The Washington Post</title>
    <dc:date>2020-11-25T14:38:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/the-press-release-crime-of-a-biotech-ceo-and-its-impact-on-scientific-research/2013/09/23/9b4a1a32-007a-11e3-9a3e-916de805f65d_story.html</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I always have trouble finding this news story again when I need it -- seven years old now, but I think this is one of my (now) Three Cautionary Tales of Data. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>science data story pharma</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:3fac2d75512f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:story"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:pharma"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-32621-w">
    <title>The genetics of university success | Scientific Reports</title>
    <dc:date>2018-10-19T12:12:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-32621-w</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Pretty sure this is a Sokal-style hoax paper.  I've been told that that's all the rage these days.]]></description>
<dc:subject>genetics wtf science twin-studies</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:825c017b6ff2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:genetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:wtf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:twin-studies"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.upress.pitt.edu/BookDetails.aspx?bookId=36600">
    <title>Soler, Trizio, Pickering &quot;Science As It Could Have Been&quot; (Univ. of Pittsburgh Press)</title>
    <dc:date>2017-09-28T15:04:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.upress.pitt.edu/BookDetails.aspx?bookId=36600</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><dc:subject>via:vaguery science history philosophy philosophy-of-science book</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:01bca1c0c16e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:via:vaguery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:philosophy-of-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:book"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/29/opinion/sunday/artificial-intelligence-is-stuck-heres-how-to-move-it-forward.html">
    <title>Artificial Intelligence Is Stuck. Here’s How to Move It Forward. - The New York Times</title>
    <dc:date>2017-07-30T15:50:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/29/opinion/sunday/artificial-intelligence-is-stuck-heres-how-to-move-it-forward.html</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This article is like if I, as a 12 year old in North Carolina, I said: “Everyone talks about how New York is so great, but I can’t actually drive there! What I need is for my parents to buy me a lot more Legos, a completely different Lego funding model.”]]></description>
<dc:subject>ai gary-marcus ridiculous science funding slacked</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:57ba3ea120c4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:gary-marcus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:ridiculous"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:funding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:slacked"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://courses.media.mit.edu/2004spring/mas966/rosenblueth_1943.pdf">
    <title>Rosenblueth, Wiener, Bigelow &quot;Behavior, Purpose, and Teleology&quot; Philosophy of Science (1943)</title>
    <dc:date>2017-05-23T16:08:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://courses.media.mit.edu/2004spring/mas966/rosenblueth_1943.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[(referenced in Herbert Simon's "The Sciences of the Artificial") ]]></description>
<dc:subject>norbert-wiener science philosophy history herbert-simon teleology</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:a4c5f6c03109/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:norbert-wiener"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:herbert-simon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:teleology"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://osf.io/gvm2z/">
    <title>OSF | Many analysts, one dataset: Making transparent how variations in analytical choices affect results</title>
    <dc:date>2016-03-17T11:42:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://osf.io/gvm2z/</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><dc:subject>via:nikete open science crowdsourcing research</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:7ddfecfc6ed1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:via:nikete"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:crowdsourcing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:research"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002106">
    <title>PLOS Biology: The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science</title>
    <dc:date>2015-03-18T15:39:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002106</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["We then illustrate how one can test for p-hacking when performing a meta-analysis and show that, while p-hacking is probably common, its effect seems to be weak relative to the real effect sizes being measured. This result suggests that p-hacking probably does not drastically alter scientific consensuses drawn from meta-analyses."

Hmmm.]]></description>
<dc:subject>to-read science p-hacking research-article plos</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:5214f3d0a40a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:to-read"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:p-hacking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:research-article"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:plos"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.pitt.edu/~pittcntr/Events/All/Conferences/others/other_conf_2014-15/04-10-15_diagrams/diagrams-cfp.html">
    <title>Center for Philosophy of Science ::: other conferences ::: quantum time</title>
    <dc:date>2014-12-01T22:41:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.pitt.edu/~pittcntr/Events/All/Conferences/others/other_conf_2014-15/04-10-15_diagrams/diagrams-cfp.html</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Oh man, I wish I could attend this.]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:cshalizi conference diagrams science visualization</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:814fa5343b04/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:via:cshalizi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:conference"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:diagrams"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:visualization"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.thegrandlocus.com/static/misc/is_the_scientific_paper_fraudulent.pdf">
    <title>Peter Medawar, &quot;Is the Scientific Paper Fraudulent?&quot; (1964)</title>
    <dc:date>2014-10-08T14:55:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.thegrandlocus.com/static/misc/is_the_scientific_paper_fraudulent.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The simplest application of the Millsian process of induction to sociology came in a rather strange movement called Mass Observation. The belief underlying Mass Observation was apparently this: that if one could only record and set down the actual raw facts about what people do and what people say in pubs, in trains, when they make love to each other, when they are playing games, and so on, then somehow, from this wealth of information, a great generalization would inevitably emerge."  

Dudes (and lady dudes), John Stuart Mill was the ULTIMATE BIG DATA HIPSTER, he was doing it before it was cool.  ]]></description>
<dc:subject>publishing science big-data awesome peter-medawar induction</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:43e1dc41a639/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:big-data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:awesome"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:peter-medawar"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:induction"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://twitter.com/OpposingThumb/status/486201689759027200">
    <title>Twitter, &quot;This guy must be missing having Hauser as a colleague&quot;</title>
    <dc:date>2014-07-07T17:46:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://twitter.com/OpposingThumb/status/486201689759027200</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[It's funny because it's true.]]></description>
<dc:subject>marc-hauser lab-for-developmental-studies psychology harvard reproducibility science twitter</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:245e11db8354/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:marc-hauser"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:lab-for-developmental-studies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:harvard"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:reproducibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:twitter"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://wjh.harvard.edu/~jmitchel/writing/failed_science.htm">
    <title>Jason Mitchell &quot;On the emptiness of failed replications&quot;</title>
    <dc:date>2014-07-07T14:23:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://wjh.harvard.edu/~jmitchel/writing/failed_science.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Recent hand-wringing over failed replications in social psychology is largely pointless, because unsuccessful experiments have no meaningful scientific value." 

Weirdly, this guy is a prof of psych at Harvard.]]></description>
<dc:subject>weird psychology statistics science replication</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:3620d691a5f0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:weird"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:statistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:replication"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2014/jun/05/stretch-genes/">
    <title>Stretch Genes by H. Allen Orr | The New York Review of Books</title>
    <dc:date>2014-06-04T00:09:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2014/jun/05/stretch-genes/</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Really, the entire review can be summed up by: 

"Do differences in currency have a genetic basis? After all, there are differences in currency!"

... which is, in fact, the right response, and also devastating.  I still claim I hated on the NYT Science section, including Wade, before it was cool.  ]]></description>
<dc:subject>nicholas-wade nytimes science writing journalism review allen-orr wow</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:d5c1884951be/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:nicholas-wade"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:nytimes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:review"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:allen-orr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:wow"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jakevdp.github.io/blog/2013/10/26/big-data-brain-drain/">
    <title>The Big Data Brain Drain: Why Science is in Trouble</title>
    <dc:date>2013-11-05T10:56:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://jakevdp.github.io/blog/2013/10/26/big-data-brain-drain/</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Meh.  The technological substrate you're operating on changes, and for a while there's a need for theoreticians to be practitioners as well, the line blurs between thinking and doing. And then things sort themselves out, concerns separate themselves out, and everyone starts breathing and reacting rationally again.  ]]></description>
<dc:subject>broad-institute technology culture science history printing-press big-science academia data-science-as-it-is-practiced</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:c39d810f9a67/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:broad-institute"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:printing-press"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:big-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:data-science-as-it-is-practiced"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://idlewords.com/2010/03/scott_and_scurvy.htm">
    <title>Scott and Scurvy</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-07T10:59:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://idlewords.com/2010/03/scott_and_scurvy.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["But unless you already understand and believe in the vitamin model of nutrition, the notion of a trace substance that exists both in fresh limes and bear kidneys, but is absent from a cask of lime juice because you happened to prepare it in a copper vessel, begins to sound pretty contrived."

A really beautiful essay on the advance (and retreat) of human knowledge, science-as-a-social-activity, the oft-ignored benefits of experiment, and the rejuvenating effects of fresh seal meat. 

(Via nikete, who contrasts it with the rather more linear and pleasant narrative advanced by this article: http://www.laphamsquarterly.org/roundtable/roundtable/the-spoil-of-mariners.php)]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:nikete science knowledge scurvy sailing history</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:cbf1e4b1e26d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:via:nikete"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:scurvy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:sailing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:history"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/adap-org/9910002">
    <title>[adap-org/9910002] A Simple Model of the Evolution of Simple Models of Evolution</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-02T09:40:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/adap-org/9910002</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[And I catch myself wondering if something similar is going on with Leslie Valiant (here: https://twitter.com/mbeisen/status/385157349779845120 ), although my prior belief in Valiant saying something more intelligent than the way it's related in an NYT review is ... higher than zero.]]></description>
<dc:subject>humor biology by:vaguery by:cshalizi awesome arxiv evolution physics sociology culture science</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:f627fc67e5c4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:humor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:biology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:by:vaguery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:by:cshalizi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:awesome"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:arxiv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:physics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:sociology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://caseybergman.wordpress.com/2013/08/04/on-the-30th-anniversary-of-dna-sequencing-in-population-genetics/">
    <title>On the 30th Anniversary of DNA Sequencing in Population Genetics | I wish you'd made me angry earlier</title>
    <dc:date>2013-09-15T13:16:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://caseybergman.wordpress.com/2013/08/04/on-the-30th-anniversary-of-dna-sequencing-in-population-genetics/</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Historical articles in population genetics -- the discussion on the blog is quite good (including personal memories from Lewontin himself), and the comments are even better.]]></description>
<dc:subject>science history population-genetics martin-kreitman richard-lewontin biology classic</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:3ae384b97dba/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:population-genetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:martin-kreitman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:richard-lewontin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:biology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:classic"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://nautil.us/">
    <title>Nautilus</title>
    <dc:date>2013-09-08T09:45:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://nautil.us/</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Sean Carroll on the board of advisors (and David Kaiser, for that matter), and only $50/year for a paper subscription.  I'm *really* tempted.]]></description>
<dc:subject>culture magazine science interesting</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:6d553e6e91b0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:magazine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:interesting"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bahfest.com/">
    <title>BAH! | The Festival Of Bad Ad Hoc Hypotheses</title>
    <dc:date>2013-09-06T09:46:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://bahfest.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I want to go to this *so badly*.]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:cshalizi comics humor science mit</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:bcdcdb4e40a8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:via:cshalizi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:comics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:humor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:mit"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://pegasus.isi.edu/">
    <title>Welcome to Pegasus | Pegasus</title>
    <dc:date>2013-08-26T20:22:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://pegasus.isi.edu/</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><dc:subject>science workflow software work firehose</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:0aca1dfc7955/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:workflow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:firehose"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://erlichya.tumblr.com/">
    <title>Future Continuous</title>
    <dc:date>2013-08-08T10:20:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://erlichya.tumblr.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Yaniv Erlich has a Tumblog?  FOLLOW.]]></description>
<dc:subject>yaniv-erlich blogging science writing privacy genomics boston</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:15f04890c1f4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:yaniv-erlich"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:genomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:boston"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1302.6906">
    <title>[1302.6906] Tradition and Innovation in Scientists' Research Strategies</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-28T13:24:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1302.6906</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><dc:subject>to-read sociology culture science discovery innovation research-article history arxiv saving</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:1c67ba826d7c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:to-read"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:sociology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:discovery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:research-article"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:arxiv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:saving"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/06/health/global-partners-agree-on-sharing-trove-of-genetic-data.html">
    <title>&quot;Accord Aims to Create Trove of Genetic Data&quot; (NYT)</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-06T08:52:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/06/health/global-partners-agree-on-sharing-trove-of-genetic-data.html</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Can we talk about this NYT article for a second?  See, this is (for me) a perfect example of why I can't stand the NYT Science coverage -- there's always *some* particular detail, which has informed something that they've written in the article, but which is left notably unstated by the article itself.  In order to understand an important (in my eyes) piece of context, you need to read between the lines...  

None of the other articles about the "global alliance" that I saw yesterday, from any other news organization, had this problem...]]></description>
<dc:subject>nytimes nyt-science-delenda-est science global-alliance personal work read-between-the-lines</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:adc4fa3ec535/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:nytimes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:nyt-science-delenda-est"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:global-alliance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:personal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:read-between-the-lines"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sciencemag.org/content/340/6134/814.full">
    <title>Troubling Trends in Scientific Software Use</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-04T18:43:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.sciencemag.org/content/340/6134/814.full</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Peer reviewing code for comments (!!) cannot be the answer -- it probably isn't even anywhere close to the answer.

The only thing that has a hope of succeeding is teaching people about software testing practices, and independently creating test suites for common problems that scientific software is written to solve in the sciences.  This is really the *only* thing that has a hope of succeeding (I'm specifically focusing on things like the "DREAM challenges" in Systems Bio: http://wiki.c2b2.columbia.edu/dream/index.php/The_DREAM_Project ).  Creation of these standards and tests are exactly the kinds of thing that journal editors and "leaders" in a field could (and should) lead.  

Otherwise, all the "Software Carpentry" classes in teh world are not going to do a bit of good.  </rant>]]></description>
<dc:subject>programming science software via:cshalizi rant</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:009b07f7d249/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:via:cshalizi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:rant"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://mikethemadbiologist.com/2013/06/03/maybe-we-should-give-up-on-peer-review-and-just-dump-everything-in-arxiv/">
    <title>Maybe We Should Give Up on Peer Review and Just Dump Everything in ArXiv | Mike the Mad Biologist</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-04T11:11:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://mikethemadbiologist.com/2013/06/03/maybe-we-should-give-up-on-peer-review-and-just-dump-everything-in-arxiv/</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Someone actually thought peer review was an *assurance* of quality -- rather than simply a *very noisy* indicator of mostly-correct grammar, marginally-relevant subject material, and a minimally-surprising conclusion (as stated in the abstract)? 

Has he never heard the phrase, "least publishable unit?" 

Weird.]]></description>
<dc:subject>culture science publishing peer-review you-keep-saying-this-peer-review-i-dont-think-it-means-what-you-think-it-means</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:20cd05f779f6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:peer-review"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:you-keep-saying-this-peer-review-i-dont-think-it-means-what-you-think-it-means"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/2013/02/05/successful-predictions-of-climate-science/">
    <title>Successful Predictions of Climate Science « Azimuth</title>
    <dc:date>2013-02-11T14:45:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/2013/02/05/successful-predictions-of-climate-science/</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[John Baez summarizes a talk (video included) by Ray Pierrehumbert on "successful predictions of climate science," itemizing both major successful *and* failed predictions.  I have a feeling I'll be coming back to this page a lot in the future (contrast, btw, with the disdain for "observational studies" evinced by Taleb in the Wired piece linked to from Zubin Jelveh's tweet, below.  <SIGH>)]]></description>
<dc:subject>climate-change john-baez summary science prediction climate-science</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:45210b68586e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:climate-change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:john-baez"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:summary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:prediction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:climate-science"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://madhadron.com/?p=263">
    <title>A farewell to bioinformatics : Fred Ross</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-28T18:15:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://madhadron.com/?p=263</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["There are only two computationally difficult problems in bioinformatics, sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree construction." --  Bwaaahahahahahahaha....]]></description>
<dc:subject>someone-is-wrong-on-the-internets bioinformatics science weird rant programming idiocy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:5c48a23fd466/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:someone-is-wrong-on-the-internets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:bioinformatics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:weird"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:rant"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:idiocy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-24/the-sad-state-of-our-science-and-how-to-fix-it.html">
    <title>Stephen Carter, &quot;The Sad State of Our Science, and How to Fix It&quot; - Bloomberg</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-25T13:23:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-24/the-sad-state-of-our-science-and-how-to-fix-it.html</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[That's some Grade A concern trolling, right there.]]></description>
<dc:subject>stephen-carter concern-trolling science culture uhmerica</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:3d1a8d944cc2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:stephen-carter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:concern-trolling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:uhmerica"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature11875.html">
    <title>Towards practical, high-capacity, low-maintenance information storage in synthesized DNA : Nature : Nature Publishing Group</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-23T21:24:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature11875.html</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Ewan Birney.  Awesome.]]></description>
<dc:subject>ewan-birney storage dna science genomics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:8fe6c48c9bfd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:ewan-birney"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:storage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:dna"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:genomics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nature.com/news/price-doesn-t-always-buy-prestige-in-open-access-1.12259">
    <title>Price doesn't always buy prestige in open access : Nature News &amp; Comment</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-22T18:31:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nature.com/news/price-doesn-t-always-buy-prestige-in-open-access-1.12259</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Would totally believe that many inhabitants of the top and bottom of the rankings are outliers due to (small) size.  Let's get some multilevel modeling here -- SHHHHHRRRRIIIINKAGE, Eli, you boy! ]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-access journals science publishing costs research there-will-be-shrinkage</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:83f862721c9e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:journals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:costs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:there-will-be-shrinkage"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/2013/01/05/do-we-really-underestimate-how-much-well-change-or-absolute-value-is-not-linear/">
    <title>Do we really underestimate how much we’ll change? (or: absolute value is not linear!) | Quomodocumque</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-07T12:55:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/2013/01/05/do-we-really-underestimate-how-much-well-change-or-absolute-value-is-not-linear/</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Episode 1,000,000 in the ongoing series of "Peer Review and Publication in a Journal is Nice, but Is Still a Low Bar." With the sub-title "Publication in a Glossy Journal is a Little Better, but Not Much." All of this explains why "The New York Times: Acting as a Megaphone for Cherry-picked Publications from Glossy Journals since God Knows When" is a bad thing for the culture in general. 

Also, when did Quomodocumque change its Wordpress theme to be identical to A Fine Theorem?  *That* is going to be confusing to me, I can predict with confidence.]]></description>
<dc:subject>prediction psychology bad-statistics quomodocumque journamalism science publication peer-review via:cshalizi</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:85b39aaa14fe/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:prediction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:bad-statistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:quomodocumque"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:journamalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:publication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:peer-review"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:via:cshalizi"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crime/review-of-fbi-forensics-does-not-extend-to-federally-trained-state-local-examiners/2012/12/22/b7ef9c2e-4965-11e2-ad54-580638ede391_story.html?wpisrc=al_excl">
    <title>Review of FBI forensics does not extend to federally trained state, local examiners - The Washington Post</title>
    <dc:date>2012-12-24T10:42:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crime/review-of-fbi-forensics-does-not-extend-to-federally-trained-state-local-examiners/2012/12/22/b7ef9c2e-4965-11e2-ad54-580638ede391_story.html?wpisrc=al_excl</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Myron T. “Mike” Scholberg, hair unit chief from 1978 to 1985, and Alan T. “Al” Robillard, chief from 1988 to 1990, said that in hindsight, they were not properly trained to answer a crucial question for jurors: How often might the hairs of different people appear to match? The truth is that there was no scientific way to know. Instead of simply acknowledging the uncertainty, agents at times drew statistics from their cases without explaining why that was an incomplete or even misleading answer, Scholberg and Robillard said." -- Deeply depressing. Why are we not unit-testing our cultural institutions like, "the FBI Laboratory's hair and fibers unit"?  (Also, what's with the "Mike" and "Al" appositives? Is that really necessary?)]]></description>
<dc:subject>testing fbi crime forensics science all-those-tlc-crime-shows-are-probably-full-of-it</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:358217094961/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:testing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:fbi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:crime"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:forensics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:all-those-tlc-crime-shows-are-probably-full-of-it"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.contra-versus.net/uploads/6/7/3/6/6736569/feyerabend_-_realism_rationalism_and_scientific_method_-_philosophical_papers_vol_1.pdf">
    <title>Feyerabend, &quot;Realism, Rationalism &amp; Scientific Method: Philosophical Papers vol. 1&quot;</title>
    <dc:date>2012-12-23T21:07:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.contra-versus.net/uploads/6/7/3/6/6736569/feyerabend_-_realism_rationalism_and_scientific_method_-_philosophical_papers_vol_1.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Volume One of Feyerabend's papers, as a scanned PDF.  ]]></description>
<dc:subject>pdf paul-feyerabend counterinduction irrationalism science philosophy book history scientific-method realism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:cf803ec252b1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:paul-feyerabend"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:counterinduction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:irrationalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:book"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:scientific-method"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:realism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://phylogenomics.blogspot.com/2012/12/great-ideas-in-this-plosone-paper.html?spref=tw">
    <title>The Tree of Life: Great ideas in this #PLoSOne paper; except we published same idea 12 fu$*# years ago</title>
    <dc:date>2012-12-22T21:03:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://phylogenomics.blogspot.com/2012/12/great-ideas-in-this-plosone-paper.html?spref=tw</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I got carried away with anger when I wrote the last few sentences crossed out above.  Upon further, more rational consideration, I do not think the authors or editors did anything really wrong here..." ]]></description>
<dc:subject>science correction jonathan-eisen stealing citation</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:ca6d8c1d5dba/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:correction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:jonathan-eisen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:stealing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:citation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://phylogenomics.blogspot.com/2012/12/great-ideas-in-this-plosone-paper.html#.UNMtDnwcoTo.twitter">
    <title>The Tree of Life: Great ideas in this #PLoSOne paper; except we published same idea 12 fu$*# years ago</title>
    <dc:date>2012-12-20T15:25:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://phylogenomics.blogspot.com/2012/12/great-ideas-in-this-plosone-paper.html#.UNMtDnwcoTo.twitter</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Mmmmfff.  (It would appear that he's removed the 'stealing' tag that was originally one of the three on this post.) ]]></description>
<dc:subject>defensiveness jonathan-eisen biology sequencing publishing science</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:986ffdfe42c0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:defensiveness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:jonathan-eisen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:biology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:sequencing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sciencemag.org/content/333/6046/1157.short">
    <title>Stransky et al. &quot;The Mutational Landscape of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma&quot; Science (Aug. 2011)</title>
    <dc:date>2012-12-01T14:08:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.sciencemag.org/content/333/6046/1157.short</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><dc:subject>cancer work carcinoma science research-article genomics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:abdcf437f987/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:cancer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:carcinoma"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:research-article"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:genomics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/08/03/jonah-lehrer-ted-and-the-narrative-dark-arts/">
    <title>Jonah Lehrer, TED, and the narrative dark arts | Felix Salmon</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-07T11:34:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/08/03/jonah-lehrer-ted-and-the-narrative-dark-arts/</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The post that turned me on to the Evgeny Morozov anti-TED essay.  

"One of the less-remarked aspects of TED is that although it popularizes science, it features very few of the people whose job it is to popularize science: science journalists." - of course, there's a totally *legitimate* reason for that.]]></description>
<dc:subject>science journalism ted journamalism jonah-lehrer by:felix-salmon</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:c32a6751c467/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:ted"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:journamalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:jonah-lehrer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:by:felix-salmon"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sciencemadness.org/library/books/ignition.pdf">
    <title>John D. Clark &quot;Ignition! An Informal History of Liquid Rocket Propellants&quot; (1972)</title>
    <dc:date>2012-07-09T20:25:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.sciencemadness.org/library/books/ignition.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In the old Royal Spanish Army there was a decoration awarded to a general who won a battle fought against orders. Of course, if he lost it, he was shot.)"  -- I got through the first forty pages just now, the whole book reads as a kind of fascinating combination of theory-of-science-as-she-is-practiced, cultural history of the immediate post-WW2 era, entrepreneurial chutzpah, swashbuckling chemists (as opposed to the swashbuckling physicists who usually star in this kind of story), and a lesson on the way that technology gets funded and developed.  Even the anecdotes about how they measured ignition times for different combinations of propellants is fascinating.  ]]></description>
<dc:subject>space history chemistry book pdf amazing science</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:58910cade09c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:space"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:chemistry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:book"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:amazing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.ipscell.com/2012/06/the-scientists-guide-to-insulting-other-scientists-elephant-in-the-lab-series/">
    <title>The scientist’s guide to insulting other scientists: elephant in the lab series | Knoepfler Lab Stem Cell Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2012-06-05T20:52:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.ipscell.com/2012/06/the-scientists-guide-to-insulting-other-scientists-elephant-in-the-lab-series/</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Literally *every* single one of these was an accurate description of "me as a grad student" ; collectively, they were the reasons I didn't want to stay in academia.  Funny, to see them spelled out so explicitly.]]></description>
<dc:subject>humor academia a-little-close-to-home personal science insults</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:1e1fb1646fa6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:humor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:a-little-close-to-home"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:personal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:insults"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://andrewgelman.com/2012/04/systematic-review-of-publication-bias-in-studies-on-publication-bias/">
    <title>&quot;Systematic review of publication bias in studies on publication bias&quot; (Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science)</title>
    <dc:date>2012-06-05T12:02:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://andrewgelman.com/2012/04/systematic-review-of-publication-bias-in-studies-on-publication-bias/</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["What we really need is a careful meta-analysis to estimate the level of publication bias in studies of publication bias of studies of publication bias."]]></description>
<dc:subject>humor andrew-gelman publication-bias science turtles-all-the-way-down</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:173737597c34/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:humor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:andrew-gelman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:publication-bias"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:turtles-all-the-way-down"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions#!/petition/require-free-access-over-internet-scientific-journal-articles-arising-taxpayer-funded-research/wDX82FLQ">
    <title>&quot;Require free access over the Internet to scientific journal articles arising from taxpayer-funded research.&quot; (Petitions | The White House)</title>
    <dc:date>2012-05-21T16:46:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions#!/petition/require-free-access-over-internet-scientific-journal-articles-arising-taxpayer-funded-research/wDX82FLQ</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Sign it. Then pass it along to your friends to sign.  Seriously.   (This is a petition, created by John Wilbanks, formerly of Creative Commons, and all-around dynamo or pro-open-access energy.)  ]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-access john-wilbanks creative-commons science publishing</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:dc30df056b86/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:john-wilbanks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:creative-commons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:publishing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=3957">
    <title>Language Log » Bible Science stories, revisited</title>
    <dc:date>2012-05-14T13:21:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=3957</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Liberman debunks the "10% of financial workers on Wall St. are psychopaths" meme.  But I *want* to believe!]]></description>
<dc:subject>psychopathy psychology science journalism mark-liberman debunking</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:d5c954f26fa7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:psychopathy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:mark-liberman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:debunking"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://pipeline.corante.com/archives/2012/04/25/dhfr_inhibitors_revisited_a_word_from_the_authors_and_reviewers.php">
    <title>&quot;DHFR Inhibitors Revisited: A Word From the Authors (and Reviewers)&quot; (In the Pipeline)</title>
    <dc:date>2012-04-27T12:53:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://pipeline.corante.com/archives/2012/04/25/dhfr_inhibitors_revisited_a_word_from_the_authors_and_reviewers.php</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A useful antidote (or merely counterpoint?) to the whole Graeber-related nastiness on Crooked Timber a while ago.  Similar kind of situation, similar Niceness Police (as Kotsko would put it) showing up in the comments, but still a much more constructive outcome.  Eager to read the final follow-up post.  [Update-- here: http://pipeline.corante.com/archives/2012/04/26/different_worlds_a_last_dhfr_paper_thought.php ]  Seriously, guys, this is what the future of scientific publishing and peer review looks like. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>trolls david-graeber science peer-review drug-discovery chemistry biology blogging</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:9ee23c6483ac/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:trolls"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:david-graeber"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:peer-review"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:drug-discovery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:chemistry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:biology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:blogging"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://cscs.umich.edu/~crshalizi/weblog/698.html">
    <title>The Neutral Model of Inquiry (or, What Is the Scientific Literature, Chopped Liver?)</title>
    <dc:date>2012-04-23T12:40:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://cscs.umich.edu/~crshalizi/weblog/698.html</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Writing a version of the thought experiment in this post as a simulation was part of my "fun work" this weekend...]]></description>
<dc:subject>science statistics simulation by:cshalizi projects weekend-programming</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:421965df05c2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:statistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:simulation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:by:cshalizi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:projects"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:weekend-programming"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=12054">
    <title>SRA format - SEQanswers</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-18T18:38:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=12054</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Guys from NCBI said me that they don't give this documentation anybody. And if you want to use the SRA format then you need to use their API." -- Eeeesh, really?? That's pretty terrible.]]></description>
<dc:subject>public-domain science open-access open-source sra genomics ridiculous</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:e2bb6853ba7b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:public-domain"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:open-source"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:sra"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:genomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:ridiculous"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://openprovenance.org/">
    <title>The Open Provenance Model</title>
    <dc:date>2012-01-10T18:49:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://openprovenance.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><dc:subject>reproducible-research open-source provenance standard web data science</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:349dcf951ae0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:reproducible-research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:open-source"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:provenance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:standard"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/primer/Primer.html">
    <title>Prov Model Primer</title>
    <dc:date>2012-01-07T15:14:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/primer/Primer.html</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><dc:subject>provenance reproducible-research yolanda-gil w3c primer science web</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:694ca96c0654/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:provenance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:reproducible-research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:yolanda-gil"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:w3c"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:primer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:web"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S153204640300011X">
    <title>Zellig Harris, &quot;The structure of science information&quot; (Journal of Biomedical Informatics)</title>
    <dc:date>2011-12-15T20:12:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S153204640300011X</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Zellig Harris! Sweet!  ]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:cshalizi science language grammar research-article informatics linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:494f499f5a24/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:via:cshalizi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:grammar"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:research-article"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:informatics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:linguistics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.fuzzierlogic.com/archives/461">
    <title>Blogging with KCite – a real world test | Fuzzier Logic</title>
    <dc:date>2011-12-14T22:58:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.fuzzierlogic.com/archives/461</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><dc:subject>citation simon-cockell kcite blogging science</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:2019e4a25b2b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:citation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:simon-cockell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:kcite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/12/361">
    <title>Chiang et al. &quot;Implementing a genomic data management system using iRODS in Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute&quot;</title>
    <dc:date>2011-12-14T12:08:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/12/361</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[iRODS paper for "reproducible research" in sequencing, from the Sanger Center.]]></description>
<dc:subject>irods data reproducible-research sanger-center bioinformatics science research-article</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:9c8a07655755/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:irods"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:reproducible-research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:sanger-center"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:bioinformatics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:research-article"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nature.com/msb/journal/v7/n1/full/msb201177.html">
    <title>Courtot et al. &quot;Controlled vocabularies and semantics in systems biology&quot; (Molecular Systems Biology)</title>
    <dc:date>2011-11-01T18:39:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nature.com/msb/journal/v7/n1/full/msb201177.html</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><dc:subject>melanie-courtot obi semanticweb ontologies science systems-biology</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:cd96df6fc8ed/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:melanie-courtot"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:obi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:semanticweb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:ontologies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:systems-biology"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.michaeleisen.org/blog/?p=572">
    <title>Notebook S1: Scientific publishing awesomeness</title>
    <dc:date>2011-09-27T14:39:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.michaeleisen.org/blog/?p=572</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["What is amazing is that – as far as I know – this is the first time anyone’s actually done it. And (members of my lab take note) this will not be the last." -- I can almost hear Eisen's students screaming from here.  Hilarious! ]]></description>
<dc:subject>michael-eisen science scanning lab-notebooks awesome</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:f5ec761d695f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:michael-eisen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:scanning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:lab-notebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:awesome"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://isatab.sourceforge.net/">
    <title>ISA</title>
    <dc:date>2011-08-13T15:48:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://isatab.sourceforge.net/</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Investigation, Study, Assay" infrastructure -- to see how this interacts with ontologies like OBI? ]]></description>
<dc:subject>annotation data ontology research science</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:b7cfb9cab71d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:annotation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:ontology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1010.1092">
    <title>Baggerly and Coombes, &quot;Deriving chemosensitivity from cell lines: Forensic bioinformatics and reproducible research in high-throughput biology&quot; (arXiv)</title>
    <dc:date>2011-08-05T13:14:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1010.1092</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The paper that knocked down the "genomic signatures" paper (doi:10.1038/nm1491).]]></description>
<dc:subject>science retraction bioinformatics genomics chemotherapeutics scandal</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:4bce33d73192/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:retraction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:bioinformatics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:genomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:chemotherapeutics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:scandal"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/es702969f">
    <title>Food-Miles and the Relative Climate Impacts of Food Choices in the United States - Environmental Science &amp; Technology (ACS Publications)</title>
    <dc:date>2011-06-30T14:41:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/es702969f</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><dc:subject>research-article energy food climate-change science</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:a637006ce0df/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:research-article"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:energy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:food"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:climate-change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2011Jun/0127.html">
    <title>Re: Schema.org in RDF ... from Richard Cyganiak on 2011-06-11 (public-lod@w3.org from June 2011)</title>
    <dc:date>2011-06-12T09:52:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2011Jun/0127.html</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This is intensely depressing, for many reasons.  Among other reasons, it means the whole "Google-style Science" project, so touted by people like Chris Anderson, is totally a lost cause.  I mean, seriously, good luck with that if you can't distinguish <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/25> the Entrez gene data record from <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/25> the gene (or any one of a dozen different kinds of things it could reasonably refer to).  Sigh.]]></description>
<dc:subject>httprange-14 cygri alan via:jenit schemadotorg ontology puns science google data idiocy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:4da597d70fa1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:httprange-14"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:cygri"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:alan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:via:jenit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:schemadotorg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:ontology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:puns"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:idiocy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://knowledgeblog.org/knowledgeblog-arrayexpress">
    <title>Knowledgeblog ArrayExpress Plugin | Knowledge Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2011-06-01T12:32:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://knowledgeblog.org/knowledgeblog-arrayexpress</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><dc:subject>arrayexpress blogging science metadata wordpress microarrays</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:cdbac3a48125/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:arrayexpress"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:metadata"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:wordpress"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:microarrays"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nature.com/nrd/journal/v1/n9/full/nrd892.html">
    <title>Hopkins, Groom, &quot;The druggable genome&quot; : Article : Nature Reviews Drug Discovery</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-14T11:15:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nature.com/nrd/journal/v1/n9/full/nrd892.html</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[(doi:10.1038/nrd892) People keep talking about this paper at work -- and Hopkins gave one of the plenaries at IDD this year.  I think what this is, is just mapping a lot of the intermediate data that's useful for drug discovery down on to the "genomic coordinate system," and making it available in one location for browsing.  Not sure how useful that really is; does it omit something key?  ]]></description>
<dc:subject>research-article drug-discovery genomics science annotation nature review</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:39f1e8c5f232/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:research-article"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:drug-discovery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:genomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:annotation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:nature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:review"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://odontomachus.wordpress.com/2011/05/04/crossrefs-gift-of-metadata/">
    <title>Crossref’s gift of metadata « Odontomachus's Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-05T15:01:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://odontomachus.wordpress.com/2011/05/04/crossrefs-gift-of-metadata/</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This is big news.]]></description>
<dc:subject>crossref data via:jar346 doi reference citation science</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:e2a7c70200dd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:crossref"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:via:jar346"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:doi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:reference"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:citation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.orcid.org/">
    <title>The Initiative | ORCID</title>
    <dc:date>2011-04-28T14:10:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.orcid.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Ontology for investigators? A replacement for ILAR? Maybe? ]]></description>
<dc:subject>ilar ontology data investigators authors science research</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:0aa4d1cc38f7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:ilar"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:ontology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:investigators"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:authors"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:research"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/projects/sagecite/">
    <title>SageCite | Project Home Page</title>
    <dc:date>2011-04-10T13:36:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/projects/sagecite/</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><dc:subject>science citation data sage-commons</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:d50cf3237e6d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:citation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:sage-commons"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://iospress.metapress.com/content/ftkh21q50t521wm2/">
    <title>Groth, Gibson, and Velterop, &quot;The Anatomy of a Nanopublication&quot;</title>
    <dc:date>2011-01-26T12:16:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://iospress.metapress.com/content/ftkh21q50t521wm2/</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This is basically SWAN, but five years after the fact -- but drives home the point of how much fo a missed opportunity SWAN really was. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>swan publishing rdf semanticweb science nanopublications research-article</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:9b7f4c7f2c42/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:swan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:rdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:semanticweb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:nanopublications"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:research-article"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://datadryad.org/">
    <title>Dryad data file: Dryad Home</title>
    <dc:date>2011-01-18T13:09:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://datadryad.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Dryad is an international repository of data underlying peer-reviewed articles in the basic and applied biosciences. Dryad enables scientists to validate published findings, explore new analysis methodologies, repurpose data for research questions unanticipated by the original authors, and perform synthetic studies." -- Data publishing, hmm.]]></description>
<dc:subject>bioinformatics data publishing via:jonathan-eisen biology science</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:2828b013cbfc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:bioinformatics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:via:jonathan-eisen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:biology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://robjhyndman.com/researchtips/authorship/">
    <title>Authorship ethics | Research tips</title>
    <dc:date>2011-01-18T12:31:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://robjhyndman.com/researchtips/authorship/</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I've actually asked to have my name taken *off* a paper, after deciding that most of my contributions fell squarely in the second category.  I'm hoping that Shaun hasn't held that against me in the long run.]]></description>
<dc:subject>authorship science ethics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:41064197d170/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:authorship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:ethics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://projecteuclid.org/DPubS?service=UI&amp;version=1.0&amp;verb=Display&amp;handle=euclid.ss/1177013012">
    <title>Iyengar , Greenhouse, &quot;Selection Models and the File Drawer Problem&quot; (Statist. Sci. 1988)</title>
    <dc:date>2010-12-11T20:28:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://projecteuclid.org/DPubS?service=UI&amp;version=1.0&amp;verb=Display&amp;handle=euclid.ss/1177013012</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><dc:subject>file-drawer-problem statistics science publication-bias publishing meta-analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:3e9d36dfbf30/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:file-drawer-problem"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:statistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:publication-bias"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:meta-analysis"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://projectreporter.nih.gov/exporter/default.aspx">
    <title>ExPORTER - NIH RePORTER Database Download &gt;&gt; Homepage</title>
    <dc:date>2010-11-16T16:16:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://projectreporter.nih.gov/exporter/default.aspx</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["This site was created to provide raw data for those who would like to conduct detailed analyses of the research projects found in RePORTER or load these records into their own data systems. These data are drawn from multiple sources and are provided to the public in the spirit of transparency even though the data, and any analyses derived from them, cannot be considered an official report of the NIH or any of the other federal agencies whose records can be found in RePORTER."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>nih data government funding grants database science</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:460f479b8efd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:nih"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:funding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:grants"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:database"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01182.x/abstract">
    <title>THE ADVENT OF MANDATORY DATA ARCHIVING - Fairbairn - Evolution - Wiley Online Library</title>
    <dc:date>2010-11-16T12:56:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01182.x/abstract</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><dc:subject>data data-archiving persistence editorial science publishing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:a43a6e6be18a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:data-archiving"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:persistence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:editorial"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:publishing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.taverna.org.uk/">
    <title>Taverna - open source and domain independent Workflow Management System</title>
    <dc:date>2010-10-25T17:02:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.taverna.org.uk/</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><dc:subject>workflow taverna science genomics mygrid java</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:f0386a794d1f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:workflow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:taverna"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:genomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:mygrid"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:java"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/sra/sra.cgi?sample=ERS000018">
    <title>Study ERS000018: Sequence Read Archive : NCBI/NLM/NIH</title>
    <dc:date>2010-10-02T12:31:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/sra/sra.cgi?sample=ERS000018</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Please tell me that this is not the full extent of the metadata that the SRA retains or requires? Isn't there some MGED (oh, sorry, "FGED") equivalent file that they want experimenters to fill out?
]]></description>
<dc:subject>ontologies metadata sequencing fged mged experimental-design science data ncbi question</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:79c128629dc1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:ontologies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:metadata"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:sequencing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:fged"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:mged"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:experimental-design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:ncbi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:question"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://afinetheorem.wordpress.com/2010/09/27/intellectual-property-rights-and-innovation-evidence-from-the-human-genome-h-williams-2010/">
    <title>“Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation: Evidence from the Human Genome,” H. Williams (2010) « A Fine Theorem</title>
    <dc:date>2010-09-28T16:29:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://afinetheorem.wordpress.com/2010/09/27/intellectual-property-rights-and-innovation-evidence-from-the-human-genome-h-williams-2010/</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The list of things that I need to blog about grows ... longer.  
]]></description>
<dc:subject>to:blog intellectual-property innovation genomics celera science biology craig-venter via:cshalizi</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:82e8bcaded90/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:to:blog"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:genomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:celera"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:biology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:craig-venter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:via:cshalizi"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/the-lay-scientist/2010/sep/24/1">
    <title>&quot;This is a news website article about a scientific finding&quot; Martin Robbins, guardian.co.uk</title>
    <dc:date>2010-09-28T01:00:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/the-lay-scientist/2010/sep/24/1</link>
    <dc:creator>arthegall</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["This is a sub-heading that gives the impression I am about to add useful context.

Here I will state that whatever was being researched was first discovered in some year, presenting a vague timeline in a token gesture toward establishing context for the reader.

To pad out this section I will include a variety of inane facts about the subject of the research that I gathered by Googling the topic and reading the Wikipedia article that appeared as the first link."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>humor science journalism journamalism yakawow</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/b:5c194a77c1ef/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:humor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:journamalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:arthegall/t:yakawow"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>