<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (Vaguery)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from Vaguery</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/3826"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bucketworks.org/concepts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://collaboration.wikia.com/wiki/Mass_collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200811/backpage.cfm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.longtail.com/the_long_tail/2008/11/the-miraculous.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/08/27/ning-vs-widgetlaboratory-and-the-challenges-underlying-open-platforms/"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/3826">
    <title>The Quiet Wikideath of BBS History « ASCII by Jason Scott</title>
    <dc:date>2012-12-12T13:34:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/3826</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[For years I’ve taken the following groundbreaking approach with BBS history: Snag as much of it as I can from as many sources as I can. Pull together data and documents that are insights into what happened. Interview people who were there. Transfer video recordings and audio recordings and scan documents and make it all into online actuality. You can debate the notability of Space Potato BBS all day, or you can scan and transfer all the Space Potato BBS material and put it somewhere where we don’t get a straw poll every harvest moon to decide to burn it to the ground.

Oh, the faces of the Wiki-faithful when I’m like this in person (and I am, in fact, like this in person). The concerned and sourpuss face when they mention something about Wikipedia and my response is fundamental distaste. The dropped mouth, the sad eyes – it’s like eating delicious key lime pie to me. Seriously: Have fun all day, folks, but I’m not going to put on the party hat and act like this birthday cake isn’t full of horse poop. Nice decorations, though.

No, the solution is to stop thinking of Wikipedia as the Source, the Big Stage, the Final Arbiter. It will fail at this and it will always fail at this as long as people get to undo the work of many others merely by being a persistent keyboard-pushing douchebag. Even on Reddit, when someone informed or at least long-winded and opinion-filled shows up, they can only downvote them into greyness, not delete them entirely.

No, primary sources. Mark my words. 2013 is the year I am scanning and duping in terabytes, terabytes of BBS and home computer material. Trust me – the world is going to get a lot more of what happened in that period.

Let Wikipedia do an article on THAT, is my advice. We’ll get by until then.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>wikinomics cultural-dynamics archiving diversity</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:b8b4e0765bcf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:wikinomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-dynamics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:archiving"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:diversity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bucketworks.org/concepts">
    <title>Concepts at Bucketworks | Bucketworks</title>
    <dc:date>2009-04-20T19:37:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://bucketworks.org/concepts</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Working in an collaborative environment that simultaneously supports business, technology, creativity, and performance give rise to new concepts. Below we list of some of the ideas we use in our work--terms you may hear or things you may experience if you become a member and spend some time in this unique environment."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>ideas workantile physical-wiki design-patterns community business-model cultural-engineering worklife project-management wikinomics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:6889cb59a9d6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:workantile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:physical-wiki"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:design-patterns"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-model"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-engineering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:worklife"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:project-management"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:wikinomics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://collaboration.wikia.com/wiki/Mass_collaboration">
    <title>Mass collaboration - Meta Collab</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-15T20:47:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://collaboration.wikia.com/wiki/Mass_collaboration</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Mass collaboration differs from mass cooperation in that the creative acts taking place requires the emergence of jointly developed shared understandings. Conversely, group members involved in a cooperation needn't engage in a joint negotiation of understanding (from which shared understandings emerge), they may simply execute instructions willingly.
Another important distinction is the borders around which a mass cooperation can be defined. Due to the extremely general characteristics and lack of need for fine grain negotiation and consensus when cooperating, the entire Internet, a city and even the global economy may be regarded as a mass cooperation. Thus a mass collaboration is more refined and complex in its process and production on the level of collective engagement."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>mass-collaboration collaboration community wikinomics sharing cultural-norms</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:ca9d45c6d069/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:mass-collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:wikinomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sharing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200811/backpage.cfm">
    <title>The Back Page</title>
    <dc:date>2008-12-07T14:02:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200811/backpage.cfm</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Wikipedia is a second example where scientists have missed an opportunity to innovate online. Wikipedia has a vision statement to warm a scientist’s heart: “Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. That’s our commitment.” You might guess Wikipedia was started by scientists eager to collect all of human knowledge into a single source. In fact, Wikipedia’s founder, Jimmy Wales, had a background in finance and as a web developer. In the early days few established scientists were involved. To contribute would arouse suspicion from colleagues that you were wasting time that could be spent writing papers and grants."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>openness open-science publishing cultural-norms collaboration transparency wikinomics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:97ae332f6f73/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:transparency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:wikinomics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.longtail.com/the_long_tail/2008/11/the-miraculous.html">
    <title>The Long Tail - Wired Blogs</title>
    <dc:date>2008-11-18T12:17:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.longtail.com/the_long_tail/2008/11/the-miraculous.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["This is the point that everyone seems to miss: Free is not a business--it's zero-cost marketing for a business. And it works best at the largest scale: a small percentage of a big number is a big number."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>freemium marketing software business-model probability scaling wikinomics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:5211c6bd5a76/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:freemium"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:marketing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-model"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:probability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:scaling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:wikinomics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/08/27/ning-vs-widgetlaboratory-and-the-challenges-underlying-open-platforms/">
    <title>Wikinomics » Blog Archive » Ning vs. WidgetLaboratory and the challenges underlying ‘open’ platforms</title>
    <dc:date>2008-08-31T14:49:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2008/08/27/ning-vs-widgetlaboratory-and-the-challenges-underlying-open-platforms/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Why I don't use Ning.

"I think it’s fair to say at this point that if you want to learn how to deal with such “open” development platforms and partnerships, do pretty much the opposite of what Ning did."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>Ning social-media social-software wikinomics business-culture bad</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:0dceb0603be9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Ning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:wikinomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:bad"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>