<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (Vaguery)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from Vaguery</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/pub/guide-for-new-activitypub-implementers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://activitypub.rocks/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://radicalscholarship.wordpress.com/2016/12/10/measuring-proficient-teachers-codifies-bad-teaching/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1309.1812"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hueniverse.com/2012/07/oauth-2-0-and-the-road-to-hell/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/03/23-8"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/public-sector/2012/03/whats-an-open-standard-says-is.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dana.org/news/cerebrum/detail.aspx?id=32066"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://consumerist.com/2010/03/congressional-audit-shows-that-energystar-label-may-be-meaningless.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.revolution-computing.com/index.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-workers/current-work/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jchrisa.net/drl/_design/sofa/_show/post/What-CouchDB-brings-to-HTML5"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://enthusiasm.cozy.org/archives/2009/03/what-a-mess"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.colorwiki.com/wiki/Delta_E:_The_Color_Difference"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://consumerist.com/5039911/say-goodbye-to-pandora"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/pub/guide-for-new-activitypub-implementers">
    <title>Guide for new ActivityPub implementers - SocialHub</title>
    <dc:date>2021-07-31T12:04:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/pub/guide-for-new-activitypub-implementers</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This wiki post is a place for collaboratively drafting ActivityPub documentation with the hope that this material may be incorporated into proposed improvements to the activitypub.rocks site, see the conversation about the new main page and the demonstration .

About this guide
This is an informal guide to help new implementers get up to speed with the ActivityPub specification and how to built projects with ActivityPub support.

Why choose ActivityPub?
Why might you choose to implement ActivityPub in your project? Possible reasons include:

“to move beyond the silos of social media sites run by individual companies” (ActivityPub as it has been understood)
Interoperability with other software supporting the same protocols.
Ability to build off existing implementations.
Collaboration opportunities.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>federated-social-media protocols standard-setting-play API to-understand to-use software-development-is-not-programming social-media consider:bandwidth bookphile</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a1f7df4fa4d9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:federated-social-media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:protocols"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:standard-setting-play"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:API"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-understand"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-use"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:software-development-is-not-programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:consider:bandwidth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:bookphile"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://activitypub.rocks/">
    <title>ActivityPub Rocks!</title>
    <dc:date>2019-04-24T10:58:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://activitypub.rocks/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Enter ActivityPub! ActivityPub is a decentralized social networking protocol based on the ActivityStreams 2.0 data format. ActivityPub is an official W3C recommended standard published by the W3C Social Web Working Group. It provides a client to server API for creating, updating and deleting content, as well as a federated server to server API for delivering notifications and subscribing to content.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>federation decentralization social-media to-understand protocol software-development-is-not-programming standard-setting-play</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:552143f567ba/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:federation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:decentralization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-understand"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:protocol"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:software-development-is-not-programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:standard-setting-play"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://radicalscholarship.wordpress.com/2016/12/10/measuring-proficient-teachers-codifies-bad-teaching/">
    <title>Measuring Proficient Teachers Codifies Bad Teaching | the becoming radical</title>
    <dc:date>2016-12-11T17:15:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://radicalscholarship.wordpress.com/2016/12/10/measuring-proficient-teachers-codifies-bad-teaching/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Rubrics, they argue, ultimately fail complex human behaviors such as writing. While rubrics facilitate statistical aspects of measuring human behaviors (such as teaching and learning), by doing so, they also tend to erode the quality of the very behaviors being measured.

As a writing teacher, I can confirm Wilson’s and Kohn’s critiques that student writing conforming to a rubric and thus deemed “proficient” or “excellent” can be and often is quite bad writing. Rubric-based labels such as “proficient” reflect compliance to the rubric, not writing quality.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>education what-gets-measured-gets-fudged academic-culture public-policy measurement standard-setting-play technocracy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:0b11a0158b9e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:what-gets-measured-gets-fudged"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:measurement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:standard-setting-play"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:technocracy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1309.1812">
    <title>[1309.1812] Cactus: Issues for Sustainable Simulation Software</title>
    <dc:date>2013-09-17T17:05:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1309.1812</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The Cactus Framework is an open-source, modular, portable programming environment for the collaborative development and deployment of scientific applications using high-performance computing. Its roots reach back to 1996 at the National Center for Supercomputer Applications and the Albert Einstein Institute in Germany, where its development jumpstarted. Since then, the Cactus framework has witnessed major changes in hardware infrastructure as well as its own community. This paper describes its endurance through these past changes and, drawing upon lessons from its past, also discusses future
]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-source open-science framework everybody-needs-a-framework standard-setting-play</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:f05365f49cd4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-source"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:framework"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:everybody-needs-a-framework"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:standard-setting-play"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hueniverse.com/2012/07/oauth-2-0-and-the-road-to-hell/">
    <title>OAuth 2.0 and the Road to Hell « hueniverse</title>
    <dc:date>2012-07-31T11:10:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://hueniverse.com/2012/07/oauth-2-0-and-the-road-to-hell/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["This is a sad conclusion to a once promising community. OAuth was the poster child of small, quick, and useful standards, produced outside standards bodies without all the process and legal overhead.

Our standards making process is broken beyond repair. This outcome is the direct result of the nature of the IETF, and the particular personalities overseeing this work. To be clear, these are not bad or incompetent individuals. On the contrary – they are all very capable, bright, and otherwise pleasant. But most of them show up to serve their corporate overlords, and it’s practically impossible for the rest of us to compete."]]></description>
<dc:subject>openauth standard-setting-play committees speak-with-one-voice antipatterns via:vielmetti</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:f299d8ac00c7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openauth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:standard-setting-play"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:committees"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:speak-with-one-voice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:antipatterns"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:vielmetti"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/03/23-8">
    <title>'A Test You Need to Fail': A Teacher's Open Letter to Her 8th Grade Students | Common Dreams</title>
    <dc:date>2012-03-24T11:51:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/03/23-8</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Because what I hadn’t known—this is my first time grading this exam—was that it doesn’t matter how well you write, or what you think. Here we spent the year reading books and emulating great writers, constructing leads that would make everyone want to read our work, developing a voice that would engage our readers, using our imaginations to make our work unique and important, and, most of all, being honest. And none of that matters. All that matters, it turns out, is that you cite two facts from the reading material in every answer. That gives you full credit. You can compose a “Gettysburg Address” for the 21st century on the apportioned lines in your test booklet, but if you’ve provided only one fact from the text you read in preparation, then you will earn only half credit. In your constructed response—no matter how well written, correct, intelligent, noble, beautiful, and meaningful it is—if you’ve not collected any specific facts from the provided readings (even if you happen to know more information about the chosen topic than the readings provide), then you will get a zero."]]></description>
<dc:subject>standards standard-setting-play culture-war education disintermediation-targets</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:0616ddc9e3c9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:standard-setting-play"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:culture-war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-targets"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/public-sector/2012/03/whats-an-open-standard-says-is.html">
    <title>&quot;What's an open standard?&quot; says ISO - Public Sector IT</title>
    <dc:date>2012-03-24T10:21:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/public-sector/2012/03/whats-an-open-standard-says-is.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The BSI has already admitted it did not know why it was lobbying against the UK's open standards policy, only that is what it had been told to do by ISO in Geneva. ISO in turn says its policy is formed by constituents like BSI. Does anyone know what's going on? BSI's resident standards experts are from non-IT, engineering fields. It's public policy expert is a career standards wonk who cannot explain its software policy either.

It was no surprise this week therefore when ISO was also unable to give Computer Weekly any examples of when it's policy might be justified. That is, when it might be justified for a patent holder to make a claim on a software standard. Neither could BSI."]]></description>
<dc:subject>politics cultural-dynamics intellectual-property standard-setting-play kafkaesque</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:f54bfd9dd674/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-dynamics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:standard-setting-play"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:kafkaesque"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dana.org/news/cerebrum/detail.aspx?id=32066">
    <title>Diagnosing the DSM - Dana Foundation</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-15T13:08:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://dana.org/news/cerebrum/detail.aspx?id=32066</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[With respect to the DSM-5, I am agnostic about the diagnostic criteria for individual conditions, such as panic disorder or generalized anxiety disorder; in the end, I am not certain that either of these categories capture nature or will even appear in the DSM-6. When it comes to individual diagnostic categories, I would recommend that the DSM-5 take a conservative approach, leaving criteria unchanged unless compelling new evidence suggests that a change would be beneficial. Whatever the ultimate approach to the DSM-5, it is critical that the scientific community escape the artificial diagnostic silos that control so much research, ultimately to our detriment.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>medical-culture diagnosis specification over-specification standard-setting-play pragmatism-it-ain't</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a55ba73ff8bf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:medical-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:diagnosis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:specification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:over-specification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:standard-setting-play"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pragmatism-it-ain't"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://consumerist.com/2010/03/congressional-audit-shows-that-energystar-label-may-be-meaningless.html">
    <title>Congressional Audit Shows That EnergyStar Label May Be Meaningless - The Consumerist</title>
    <dc:date>2010-03-30T12:53:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://consumerist.com/2010/03/congressional-audit-shows-that-energystar-label-may-be-meaningless.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In a nine-month study, four fictitious companies invented by the accountability office also sought EnergyStar status for some conventional devices like dehumidifiers and heat pump models that existed only on paper. The fake companies submitted data indicating that the models consumed 20 percent less energy than even the most efficient ones on the market. Yet those applications were mostly approved without a challenge or even questions, the report said."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>energy-efficiency energy-star regulation public-policy standard-setting-play marketing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:8fecab9cdec0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:energy-efficiency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:energy-star"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:regulation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:standard-setting-play"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:marketing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.revolution-computing.com/index.php">
    <title>R Language is optimized, validated and supported by REvolution Computing - Predictive analytics for large data analysis problems</title>
    <dc:date>2009-11-08T12:46:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.revolution-computing.com/index.php</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["REvolution Computing offers open source products and services for high performance analytics, including REvolution R Enterprise which delivers 100% R and more—optimized, validated and supported."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>R open-source business-model programming statistics visualization mathematics consulting standard-setting-play</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:2f0a30aba527/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:R"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-source"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-model"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:statistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:visualization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:mathematics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:consulting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:standard-setting-play"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-workers/current-work/">
    <title>Web Workers</title>
    <dc:date>2009-10-30T21:49:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-workers/current-work/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["This specification defines an API that allows Web application authors to spawn background workers running scripts in parallel to their main page. This allows for thread-like operation with message-passing as the coordination mechanism."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>web-applications standard-setting-play distributed-processing programming standards API specification HTML5 threads Nudge</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:4228fef208b3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:web-applications"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:standard-setting-play"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:distributed-processing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:API"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:specification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:HTML5"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:threads"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Nudge"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jchrisa.net/drl/_design/sofa/_show/post/What-CouchDB-brings-to-HTML5">
    <title>What CouchDB brings to HTML5 : Daytime Running Lights</title>
    <dc:date>2009-10-30T21:45:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://jchrisa.net/drl/_design/sofa/_show/post/What-CouchDB-brings-to-HTML5</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In a CouchDB-enabled web, data-flows don't have to be centralized, which means friends can communicate without going through a fixed domain. This makes the web more efficient. It also means I can make data available to my social network without relying on 3rd-party services."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>CouchDB HTML5 standard-setting-play distributed-processing openness open-access grid-computing social-networks</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:95738d82025c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:CouchDB"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:HTML5"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:standard-setting-play"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:distributed-processing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:grid-computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-networks"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://enthusiasm.cozy.org/archives/2009/03/what-a-mess">
    <title>Ascription is an Anathema to any Enthusiasm › What a mess!</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-18T11:06:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://enthusiasm.cozy.org/archives/2009/03/what-a-mess</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Standards create opportunities to do stuff.  These opportunities may well be patent worthy.  So if you want to grow out the thicket around the emerging standard you just lock some smart guys in a room and start them brain storming.  Some of what they come up with will be obvious, but that hardly means you won’t be able to capture a patent for it.   Just to add to fire to the shit storm it appears that Redhat’s patent is for the mind bogglingly obvious idea of transfering XML data over AMQP.  Of course any patent worth it’s lawyering starts with some broad claim and then get’s more focused."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>intellectual-property patents openness competition cooperation standard-setting-play</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:b55bcd567fd2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:competition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cooperation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:standard-setting-play"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.colorwiki.com/wiki/Delta_E:_The_Color_Difference">
    <title>ColorWiki - Delta E: The Color Difference</title>
    <dc:date>2008-12-11T17:50:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.colorwiki.com/wiki/Delta_E:_The_Color_Difference</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Finally, which equation should be chosen and how should it be used?

• for basic / fast calculations, you can use dE76 but beware of its problems
• for graphics arts use we recommend dE94 and perhaps dE-CMC 2:1..."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>color distance comparison programming standards standardization standard-setting-play metrics Nudge</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:7b2fcba5162a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:color"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:distance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:comparison"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:standardization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:standard-setting-play"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:metrics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Nudge"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://consumerist.com/5039911/say-goodbye-to-pandora">
    <title>Pandora: Say Goodbye To Pandora?</title>
    <dc:date>2008-08-22T12:57:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://consumerist.com/5039911/say-goodbye-to-pandora</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["When SoundExchange, the organization that represents many labels and artists, proposed steep new royalty rates for radio webcasters last year, they shortsightedly killed off their own revenue stream. Instead of their proposed rates being cut back as part of a standard negotiation, they were surprised to see the U.S. Copyright Royalty Board reject opposing arguments and adopt SoundExchange's rates fully. Now Pandora, the popular streaming music site, says it's paying over 70% of its revenue in royalties, and unless Washington changes the rates soon—which looks unlikely— they will have to shut down."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>economics DRM public-policy intellectual-property music sharing Pandora trade-association standard-setting-play</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:cdaf5a3c5817/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:DRM"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:music"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sharing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Pandora"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:trade-association"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:standard-setting-play"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>