<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (Vaguery)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from Vaguery</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cambridgeblog.org/2021/12/precarity-privilege-and-publication/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://onezero.medium.com/facing-the-great-reckoning-head-on-8fe434e10630"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/j2tw9/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-woman-who-bested-the-men-at-math-120480965/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://longreads.com/2017/12/05/the-consent-of-the-ungoverned/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.teenvogue.com/story/fashion-is-political-period"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/24/opinion/i-have-a-character-issue.html?smid=tw-share&amp;_r=0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bigthink.com/marriage-30/when-is-a-gaffe-not-a-gaffe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ilaba.wordpress.com/2011/03/28/why-im-not-on-mathoverflow/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://science-professor.blogspot.com/2007/07/am-i-my-husband.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://crookedtimber.org/2007/03/06/also-feminism-is-not-responsible-for-girls-gone-wild/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nyu.edu/classes/siva/archives/004014.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/21/court-issues-unbelievably-stupid-sex-crime-ruling/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://melancholicfeminista.blogspot.com/2007/01/what-younger-women-faculty-face.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://lablemminglounge.blogspot.com/2006/12/google-simply-doesnt-give-shit-about.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://www.cambridgeblog.org/2021/12/precarity-privilege-and-publication/">
    <title>Precarity, Privilege, and Publication; or, How to Publish a Monograph Without an Academic Job | FifteenEightyFour | Cambridge University Press</title>
    <dc:date>2022-01-09T20:43:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.cambridgeblog.org/2021/12/precarity-privilege-and-publication/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[It’s particularly appropriate to talk about this in connection with my book because discussing the conditions of academic work is part of what this book does. In Shakespeare’s ‘Lady Editors’, I explore the lives and labours of almost seventy women who edited Shakespeare prior to 1950. One of the interesting demographic trends I noticed while researching is that many of them never held university jobs, even after women’s colleges and coeducational universities made those jobs available to women. Although this seems strange to imagine now, when most editing is done by an extremely limited number of academics, the majority of the editions discussed in the book were published around the end of the nineteenth century into the early twentieth, meaning that these women editors were active during the dawn of modern Western literary studies. And as literature became a subject to be studied in schools and universities, and thus, an official academic discipline, there came into existence a new subspecies of humanity – the Professor of English Literature.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>academic-culture literary-criticism rather-interesting sexism history-of-ideas</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:1989f7895403/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:literary-criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sexism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:history-of-ideas"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://onezero.medium.com/facing-the-great-reckoning-head-on-8fe434e10630">
    <title>Facing the Great Reckoning Head-On - OneZero</title>
    <dc:date>2019-09-21T11:32:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://onezero.medium.com/facing-the-great-reckoning-head-on-8fe434e10630</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[And so, if my recognition means anything, I need it to be a call to arms. We need to all stand up together and challenge the status quo. The tech industry must start to face The Great Reckoning head-on. My experiences are all too common for women and other marginalized peoples in tech. It’s also all too common for well-meaning guys to do shitty things that make it worse for those that they believe they’re trying to support.
If change is going to happen, values and ethics need to have a seat in the boardroom. Corporate governance goes beyond protecting the interests of capitalism. Change also means that the ideas and concerns of all people need to be a part of the design phase and the auditing of systems, even if this slows down the process. We need to bring back and reinvigorate the profession of quality assurance so that products are not launched without systematic consideration of the harms that might occur. Call it security or call it safety, but it requires focusing on inclusion. After all, whether we like it or not, the tech industry is now in the business of global governance.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>sexism calls-to-arms tech-industry revolution have-read</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a125d600c2e2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sexism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:calls-to-arms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:tech-industry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:revolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:have-read"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/j2tw9/">
    <title>SocArXiv Papers | Scaling Down Inequality: Rating Scales, Gender Bias, and the Architecture of Evaluation</title>
    <dc:date>2019-03-03T15:28:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/j2tw9/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Quantitative performance ratings are ubiquitous in modern organizations—from businesses to universities—yet there is substantial evidence of bias against women in such ratings. This study examines how gender inequalities in evaluations depend on the design of the tools used to judge merit. Exploiting a quasi-natural experiment at a large North American university, we found that the number of scale points used in faculty teaching evaluations—whether instructors were rated on a scale of 6 versus a scale of 10—significantly affected the size of the gender gap in evaluations. A survey experiment, which presented all participants with an identical lecture transcript but randomly varied instructor gender and the number of scale points, replicated this finding and suggested that the number of scale points affects the extent to which gender stereotypes of brilliance are expressed in quantitative ratings. These results highlight how seemingly minor technical aspects of performance ratings can have a major effect on the evaluation of men and women. Our findings thus contribute to a growing body of work on organizational practices that reduce workplace inequalities and the sociological literature on how rating systems—rather than being neutral instruments—shape the distribution of rewards in organizations.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>academia what-gets-measured-gets-fudged performance-measure corporatism benchmarking academic-culture sexism bias technocracy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:3ff2e89222e5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:what-gets-measured-gets-fudged"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:performance-measure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:corporatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:benchmarking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sexism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:bias"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:technocracy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-woman-who-bested-the-men-at-math-120480965/">
    <title>The Woman Who Bested the Men at Math | History | Smithsonian</title>
    <dc:date>2018-04-06T13:56:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-woman-who-bested-the-men-at-math-120480965/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[To be a woman in the Victorian age was to be weak: the connection was that definite. To be female was also to be fragile, dependent, prone to nerves and—not least—possessed of a mind that was several degrees inferior to a man’s. For much of the 19th century, women were not expected to shine either academically or athletically, and those who attempted to do so were cautioned that they were taking an appalling risk. Mainstream medicine was clear on this point: to dream of studying at the university level was to chance madness or sterility, if not both.

It took generations to transform this received opinion; that, a long series of scientific studies, and the determination and hard work of many thousands of women. For all that, though, it is still possible to point to one single achievement, and one single day, and say: this is when everything began to change. That day was June 7, 1890, when—for the first and only time—a woman ranked first in the mathematical examinations held at the University of Cambridge. It was the day that Philippa Fawcett placed “above the Senior Wrangler.”

]]></description>
<dc:subject>nanohistory sexism biography mathematics academic-culture</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:5b095674a808/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:nanohistory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sexism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:biography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:mathematics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://longreads.com/2017/12/05/the-consent-of-the-ungoverned/">
    <title>The Consent of the (Un)governed</title>
    <dc:date>2018-01-28T12:18:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://longreads.com/2017/12/05/the-consent-of-the-ungoverned/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I have big fights with an older female relative about this. She believes that women have a great deal of responsibility when they are assaulted, and I suspect that the reason she believes this is because it gives her comfort and a sense of control to think that there was choice involved. Because the alternative is worse. The alternative is that there’s nothing she can do to stop it, and by extension, nothing she can do to protect her daughters, her granddaughters, her friends, herself. Feeling complicit in our own harassment allows us to survive trauma, but it also prevents us from confronting it. This is how we get a world where women, for their own safety, are counseled by the people who love them against walking alone at night. It’s our choice, a choice we make for our own good, as independent women, to minimize our risk. But that’s not freedom. That’s something else.

The same is true of both the democratic process and, to some extent, the labor market. Individuals are offered very little choice indeed, but the choices we do have are inflated into much more than they are. Since it allows us to believe that we are free and it suits those in power that we continue to believe this, we cling doggedly to our anemic choices and call it love.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:various activism sexism political-economy reactionaries social-norms cultural-assumptions neoliberalism fascism labor capitalism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:d1f1adcf76d2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:various"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:activism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sexism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:political-economy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:reactionaries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:neoliberalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:fascism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:capitalism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.teenvogue.com/story/fashion-is-political-period">
    <title>Fashion IS Political, Period | Teen Vogue</title>
    <dc:date>2018-01-28T12:14:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.teenvogue.com/story/fashion-is-political-period</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[We all know politics is about power and as feminist theory famously posits, the personal is political. While our clothing reflects who we are, in many ways it can also determine our ability to gain entry into influential spaces. Yet when women express an interest in fashion, it is often weaponized as a means of denying us access to political conversations—as if these interests were mutually exclusive.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>fashion sexism politics diversity activism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:5ff4a9218291/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:fashion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sexism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:diversity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:activism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/24/opinion/i-have-a-character-issue.html?smid=tw-share&amp;_r=0">
    <title>I Have a Character Issue - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2013-08-24T13:17:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/24/opinion/i-have-a-character-issue.html?smid=tw-share&amp;_r=0</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[But I finally realized that most people’s hatred of Skyler had little to do with me and a lot to do with their own perception of women and wives. Because Skyler didn’t conform to a comfortable ideal of the archetypical female, she had become a kind of Rorschach test for society, a measure of our attitudes toward gender.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>cultural-norms sexism American-cultural-assumptions television oh-dear</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:9d372195945f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sexism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:American-cultural-assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:television"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:oh-dear"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bigthink.com/marriage-30/when-is-a-gaffe-not-a-gaffe">
    <title>When is a Gaffe not a Gaffe? | Marriage 3.0 | Big Think</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-13T23:17:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://bigthink.com/marriage-30/when-is-a-gaffe-not-a-gaffe</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The faction that keeps making these comments about rape are striving in general to undo the gains of the women’s movement, consistent with their perspective that abortion rights, sexual rights, easy access to birth control, and the advancement of sexual liberty by the emphasis on consent, for example, were culturally damaging developments that they’d like to see reversed. 

This agenda, or political mood, is hardly a secret. The most elegant, if politically alarming, likelihood is that the comments say what the speaker wants to say.

Otherwise, they wouldn’t get said so often.  

As they say, you can hide the fire, but what are you going to do with the smoke?]]></description>
<dc:subject>politics conservatism sexism Republicans cultural-norms</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:4f81cbc324f3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conservatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sexism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Republicans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ilaba.wordpress.com/2011/03/28/why-im-not-on-mathoverflow/">
    <title>Why I’m not on MathOverflow « The Accidental Mathematician</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-14T13:00:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://ilaba.wordpress.com/2011/03/28/why-im-not-on-mathoverflow/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[We get mistaken for graduate students: I had to field questions along the lines of “so who do you work with?” for at least 10 years after Ph.D. We get interrupted, talked over or ignored in conversation. When we disagree with our male colleagues, especially on administrative matters, we’re presumed to be mistaken until proved otherwise. In collaborations, we’re assumed to be the lesser participants far more often than we’re assumed to be the leaders. In situations that require a compromise, the “reasonable” expectation is for us to meet the other party about 4/5 of the way, if not farther.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>sexism online-culture communication MathOverload academic-culture</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:f8651c488931/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sexism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:online-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:MathOverload"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://science-professor.blogspot.com/2007/07/am-i-my-husband.html">
    <title>FemaleScienceProfessor: Am I My Husband?</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-07T15:27:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://science-professor.blogspot.com/2007/07/am-i-my-husband.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>sexism academia cultural-norms social-norms</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:64675ae05901/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sexism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://crookedtimber.org/2007/03/06/also-feminism-is-not-responsible-for-girls-gone-wild/">
    <title>Crooked Timber » » Also, Feminism Is Not Responsible For Girls Gone Wild</title>
    <dc:date>2007-03-07T13:48:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://crookedtimber.org/2007/03/06/also-feminism-is-not-responsible-for-girls-gone-wild/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>social-norms sexuality sexism gender oppression stereotypes</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:461a71f7bf94/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sexuality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sexism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:gender"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:oppression"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:stereotypes"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nyu.edu/classes/siva/archives/004014.html">
    <title>SIVACRACY.NET: Many &quot;Tiffany&quot; Lamps Were Designed By Uncredited Women?</title>
    <dc:date>2007-02-28T12:03:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nyu.edu/classes/siva/archives/004014.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>antiques decorative-art design art sexism attribution business-culture</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:2dcc32835279/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:antiques"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:decorative-art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sexism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:attribution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-culture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/21/court-issues-unbelievably-stupid-sex-crime-ruling/">
    <title>Alas, a blog » Blog Archive » Court Issues Unbelievably Stupid Sex Crime Ruling</title>
    <dc:date>2007-02-25T16:01:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2007/02/21/court-issues-unbelievably-stupid-sex-crime-ruling/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Not sure if I can afford to create a new tag suitable to describe this.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>social-norms cultural-norms stupidity law sexuality sexism pornography</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:2a9123afc920/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:stupidity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sexuality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sexism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pornography"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://melancholicfeminista.blogspot.com/2007/01/what-younger-women-faculty-face.html">
    <title>Mad Melancholic Feminista: What Younger Women Faculty Face</title>
    <dc:date>2007-01-29T13:47:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://melancholicfeminista.blogspot.com/2007/01/what-younger-women-faculty-face.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>sexism faculty academia worklife pressure</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:36a52dffb69f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sexism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:faculty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:worklife"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pressure"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://lablemminglounge.blogspot.com/2006/12/google-simply-doesnt-give-shit-about.html">
    <title>Lounge of the Lab Lemming: Google simply doesn’t give a shit about woman scientists’ publication records</title>
    <dc:date>2007-01-25T16:34:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://lablemminglounge.blogspot.com/2006/12/google-simply-doesnt-give-shit-about.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>academia culture sexism search-engines Google NLP</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:17499a0c5a4c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sexism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:search-engines"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:NLP"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>