<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (Vaguery)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from Vaguery</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://medium.com/@chanda/decolonising-science-reading-list-339fb773d51f#.om5w2ivfq"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ronininstitute.org/performance-and-collaboration-creating-new-scientific-ecosystems/1835/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.worldwidewanderings.net/science.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.americanscientist.org/blog/macroscope/scientists-must-challenge-what-makes-studies-scientific"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.leptonica.com/skew-measurement.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/auk.2010.32.issue-2/auk-2010-0201/auk-2010-0201.xml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://medium.com/@jamesheathers/the-grim-test-a-method-for-evaluating-published-research-9a4e5f05e870"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.02042"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://nautil.us/issue/26/color/bring-us-your-genes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.01610"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=17916"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://unrealnature.wordpress.com/2014/12/08/the-end/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thearchdruidreport.blogspot.com/2014/12/dark-age-america-sharp-edge-of-shell.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.elsevier.com/reviewers/reviewers-update/registered-reports-a-step-change-in-scientific-publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://unrealnature.wordpress.com/2013/12/14/self-conscious/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.aeonmagazine.com/being-human/david-berreby-obesity-era/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.4672"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com/2013/02/what-is-basic-research.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&amp;id=2698"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=3180"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fastcompany.com/1709448/interview-with-a-bee-leaker-beekeeper-tom-theobald-discusses-the-epas-bee-toxic-pesticide-co"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/0912.1567"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.computationalcomplexity.org/2010/05/is-complexity-math-or-science.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://zenpundit.com/?p=3398"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.6087"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://barf.jcowboy.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://findingada.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://younglandis.wordpress.com/2010/02/06/futureofnews/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://wordmunger.com/?p=1236"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.0454"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.rifters.com/crawl/?p=886"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://scienceblogs.com/commonknowledge/2009/10/open_source_science_or_distrib.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v461/n7266/full/461881a.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/rushkoff09/rushkoff09_index.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sciplus.com/youneed.cfm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1174"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.garyjones.org/mt/archives/001127.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://vonahn.blogspot.com/2009/02/academic-publications-20.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.greenisgood.co.uk/green/pages/show/activeresearch-announce"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://judeandserene.blogspot.com/2009/03/why-its-ok-to-feel-stupid-especially-in.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.earthmagazine.org/earth/article/1eb-7d9-3-d"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/statins/more-statin-madness/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://norvig.com/fact-check.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://crookedtimber.org/2009/01/27/charles-stross-book-event/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mygrid.org.uk/tools/taverna/what-is-a-workflow/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://wiki.myexperiment.org/index.php/Main_Page"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.stanford.edu/class/ee380/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://paul.kedrosky.com/archives/2009/01/01/lord_kelvin_and.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://boinc.berkeley.edu/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.steamthing.com/2008/11/a-big-question-about-the-templeton-foundation.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.oddhead.com/2008/11/14/the-predict-flu-using-search-study-you-didnt-hear-about/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/1266869.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-08/yu-gd080408.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://xkcd.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/Media/releases/ssc2008-10/release.shtml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-06/uom-tsf060408.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kk.org/quantifiedself/2008/05/annals-of-selfexperiment-seth.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sagemath.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emergent.brynmawr.edu/eprg/?page=EmergentPhenomena"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/SPT/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2008/02/28/open-science-open-seminars/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/03/rationality-q-1.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://imomus.livejournal.com/356429.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.arunn.net/blog/2008/02/23/guilty-of-plagiarizing-seventy-research-papers/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.syrexe.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.tomnackidart.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2008/02/10/how-to-be-wrong-continued/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.dreamsongs.com/Feyerabend/Feyerabend.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://scienceblogs.com/greengabbro/2008/02/why_i_dont_use_the_bpr3_icon.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2008/30jan_mercurysurprise.htm?list214102"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://medium.com/@chanda/decolonising-science-reading-list-339fb773d51f#.om5w2ivfq">
    <title>Decolonising Science Reading List - Chanda Prescod-Weinstein - Medium</title>
    <dc:date>2019-11-27T12:50:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://medium.com/@chanda/decolonising-science-reading-list-339fb773d51f#.om5w2ivfq</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[In April, 2015, one of the most visible topics of discussion in the Astronomy community was the planned Thirty Meter Telescope and protests against it from Native Hawaiians who didn’t want it built on Mauna Kea. I wrote a lot about this on social media, spending some significant time trying to contextualize the debate. This reading list was originally created in response to requests for where I was getting some of the information from. A lot of people asked me about what I’d been reading as reference points for my commentary on the relationship between colonialism and what we usually call “modern science.”
In August 2016 I updated to announce: I’m happy to report that Sarah Tuttle and I will be contributing to this list with our own publications in future thanks to this FQXi grant that we are co-I/PI on: Epistemological Schemata of Astro|Physics: A Reconstruction of Observers. The grant proposal was based on a written adaptation of a speech I gave at the Inclusive Astronomy conference, Intersectionality as a Blueprint for Postcolonial Scientific Community Building.
As part of this work, I’ve continued to expand the reading list, which seems to have become a global resource for people interested in science and colonialism. As I originally said, I make no claims about completeness, about updating it regularly, or even ever coming up with a system for organizing it that I find to be satisfactory. You’ll find texts that range from personal testimony to Indigenous cosmology to anthropology, to history to sociology to education research. All are key to the process of decolonising science, which is a pedagogical, cultural, and intellectual set of interlocking structures, ideas, and practices. This reading list functions on the premise that there is value in considering the ways in which science and society co-construct. It is stuff that I have read all or part of and saw some value in sharing with others.
I am especially indebted to the #WeAreMaunaKea movement for educating me and spurring me to educate myself.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>science colonialism racism history-of-science reading to-read</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:3ca7bd129d5c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:colonialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:racism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:history-of-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-read"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ronininstitute.org/performance-and-collaboration-creating-new-scientific-ecosystems/1835/">
    <title>Performance and collaboration: creating new scientific ecosystems at CESTEMER | Ronin Institute</title>
    <dc:date>2018-03-05T14:57:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://ronininstitute.org/performance-and-collaboration-creating-new-scientific-ecosystems/1835/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The intense competition to demonstrate individual “ownership” of an idea often prevails in the academic world (coupled with an artificial scarcity that is perpetuated by the journal prestige system amongst other things) can sometimes lead to an atmosphere of distrust. Therefore the direct experience of the value of empathetic collaboration to produce both better results, as well as unexpected and serendipitous discoveries, through such workshops, will become increasingly invaluable as a means for cultural change in our institutions. This bottom-up approach, coupled with more top-down changes in publications and funding incentives, will, I believe, lead to more durable cultural change than either alone. Plus it’s also a much more fun way of doing science!

]]></description>
<dc:subject>science open-science collaboration conferences to-do next-time</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:3fea8dd6c23b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conferences"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-do"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:next-time"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.worldwidewanderings.net/science.html">
    <title>World Wide Wanderings</title>
    <dc:date>2018-02-03T23:02:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.worldwidewanderings.net/science.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Over the years I have worked on many different research and computing projects, all over the world. Most of my scientific work is related to the origin of life, evolution, and complex systems & emergence. Below is a brief overview of the main projects that I am currently working on. Preprints of my publications on this work are available for download (see the list of publications).
]]></description>
<dc:subject>hey-I-know-this-guy science complexology to-write-about</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:27b3cf1036cf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:hey-I-know-this-guy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:complexology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.americanscientist.org/blog/macroscope/scientists-must-challenge-what-makes-studies-scientific">
    <title>Scientists Must Challenge What Makes Studies Scientific | American Scientist</title>
    <dc:date>2017-08-27T13:38:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.americanscientist.org/blog/macroscope/scientists-must-challenge-what-makes-studies-scientific</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[There is a strange contradiction among scientists: Science is supposedly about asking questions, except about scientists and how science is done. Although research in the philosophy, history, sociology, and anthropology of science has gone on in earnest for decades, very few if any of the results are integrated into science education and therefore science practice. Scientists may not see how a subject like sociology or anthropology applies to their technical work, but science doesn’t happen in a vacuum apart from society. Indeed, scientists are acting against science when they do not acknowledge the history, philosophy, and sociology of their fields, demanding instead that people accept their research results without question.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>science introspection essay philosophy-of-science the-mangle-in-practice to-write-about history-is-a-feature-not-a-bug</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:ab98c51fe372/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:introspection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:essay"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy-of-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:the-mangle-in-practice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:history-is-a-feature-not-a-bug"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.leptonica.com/skew-measurement.html">
    <title>[untitled]</title>
    <dc:date>2017-04-24T12:27:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.leptonica.com/skew-measurement.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I can't resist telling a little story here. Way back in 1991 I gave a paper at the first ICDAR Conference, held in the beautiful medieval town of St. Malo, France. The format had the speakers sitting at a table at the front of the room, and I was placed next to a well-known graybeard who had published a textbook on algorithms for image processing way back in 1982. We started talking about our recent work, and he said his paper was on segmenting a scanned document page that was skewed by a few degrees. I volunteered that it would be much harder to do that on a skewed page, and he agreed. So I asked him the obvious question: "Why do something so difficult when there is a much easier way to do it? Deskew the image first." (I didn't add a second reason: that the result of segmenting a scanned image is also expected to be much poorer if the image hasn't been deskewed.) He replied that it would be preferable to deskew the image, but it was much too slow. I replied that surely it took longer to segment an image than to deskew it. No, he said, it takes at least a minute just to determine the skew angle. I was surprised, and asked him what method he was using for deskew. He said he was using a Hough Transform, but was vague on the details of the search scheme. I then told him that the skew angle could be found to sufficient accuracy in a few seconds using Postl's variance of line sums (or of differential line sums). He was skeptical; if what I said was true, his attempt to solve a difficult problem was meaningless. There are several conclusions we can draw from this tale. (1) Don't believe something just because an eminence grise says it is true -- figure it out for yourself. (2) Always look for elegant solutions. They have lasting value and usually teach you something important, which can be used in other situations as well. (3) Remember two things about computer algorithms. Computers get faster in accordance with Moore's Law, so you can assume that algorithms that are too slow today will eventually become practical. But, that being said, at any time, it is important to search for efficient methods.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>science anecdote advice true-enough</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:94326c631102/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:anecdote"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:advice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:true-enough"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/auk.2010.32.issue-2/auk-2010-0201/auk-2010-0201.xml">
    <title>Scientific Knowledge and Scientific Expertise: Epistemic and Social Conditions of Their Trustworthiness : Analyse &amp; Kritik</title>
    <dc:date>2017-04-07T14:06:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/auk.2010.32.issue-2/auk-2010-0201/auk-2010-0201.xml</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The article explores epistemic and social conditions of the trustworthiness of scientific expertise. I claim that there are three kinds of conditions for the trustworthiness of scientific expertise. The first condition is epistemic and means that scientific knowledge enjoys high credibility. The second condition concerns the significance of scientific knowledge. It means that scientific generalizations are relevant for elucidating the particular cases that constitute the challenges for expert judgment. The third condition concerns the social processes involved in producing science-based recommendations. In this context trust is created by social robustness, expert legitimacy, and social participation.

About the article
]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:? science academic-culture publishing philosophy-of-science sociology</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:81555a7942d3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:?"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy-of-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sociology"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://medium.com/@jamesheathers/the-grim-test-a-method-for-evaluating-published-research-9a4e5f05e870">
    <title>The GRIM test — a method for evaluating published research. – Medium</title>
    <dc:date>2017-03-31T11:30:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://medium.com/@jamesheathers/the-grim-test-a-method-for-evaluating-published-research-9a4e5f05e870</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Ever had one of those ideas where you thought: “No, this is too simple, someone must have already thought of it.”
And then found that no-one had?
And that it was a good idea after all?
Well, that’s what happened to us.
(Who is us? I’m going to use pronouns messily through the following almost-3000 words, but let the record show: ‘us’ and ‘we’ is Nick Brown and myself.)
The pre-print of this paper is HERE — “The GRIM test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology”.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:arthegall statistics looking-to-see inverse-problems rather-interesting academic-culture publishing science peer-review</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:e71356e458ae/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:arthegall"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:statistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:looking-to-see"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:inverse-problems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:peer-review"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.02042">
    <title>[1504.02042] A Framework for Understanding the Patterns of Student Reasoning Difficulties in Quantum Mechanics</title>
    <dc:date>2015-11-01T13:30:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.02042</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Compared with introductory physics, relatively little is known about the development of expertise in advanced physics courses, especially in the case of quantum mechanics. Here, we describe a framework for understanding the patterns of student reasoning difficulties and how students develop expertise in quantum mechanics. The framework posits that the challenges many students face in developing expertise in quantum mechanics are analogous to the challenges introductory students face in developing expertise in introductory classical mechanics. This framework incorporates both the diversity in upper-level students' prior preparation, goals, and motivation in general (i.e., the facts that even in upper-level courses, students may be inadequately prepared, have unclear goals, and have insufficient motivation to excel) as well as the "paradigm shift" from classical mechanics to quantum mechanics. The framework is based on empirical investigations demonstrating that the patterns of reasoning, problem-solving, and self-monitoring difficulties in quantum mechanics bear a striking resemblance to those found in introductory classical mechanics. Examples from research in quantum mechanics and introductory classical mechanics are discussed to illustrate how the patterns of difficulties are analogous as students learn to unpack the respective principles and grasp the formalism in each knowledge domain during the development of expertise. Embracing such a framework and contemplating the parallels between the difficulties in these two knowledge domains can enable researchers to leverage the extensive literature for introductory physics education research to guide the design of teaching and learning tools for helping students develop expertise in quantum mechanics.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>pedagogy education science academic-culture sociology scientific-communication rather-interesting models-and-modes</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:c3c0f490a08e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sociology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:scientific-communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:models-and-modes"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://nautil.us/issue/26/color/bring-us-your-genes">
    <title>Bring Us Your Genes - Issue 26: Color - Nautilus</title>
    <dc:date>2015-07-09T14:20:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://nautil.us/issue/26/color/bring-us-your-genes</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[In the Middle Ages, scribes set down the legendary deeds of Kveldulf the Viking and the nation’s legendary explorers and families in the Sagas of the Icelanders. In the depth of winter not long ago, I ventured to Iceland to write my saga of the Icelander who would conquer the genetic code.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>science genetics narrative science-writing good-examples</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:0bc935dd7d81/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:genetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:narrative"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science-writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:good-examples"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.01610">
    <title>[1501.01610] Analysis of a work of quantum art</title>
    <dc:date>2015-03-15T21:00:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.01610</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This paper provides a quantum-mechanical analysis of an artwork, `Wigner's friends,' by Diemut Strebe. The work consists of two telescopes, one on earth, one launched into space, and explores ideas of quantum correlations and quantum measurement. This paper examines the scientific basis of the work and analyzes the form of quantum correlation between the two telescope systems.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>art science conceptual-art</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:de8a5e713b55/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conceptual-art"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=17916">
    <title>Language Log » Reliability</title>
    <dc:date>2015-03-03T11:29:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=17916</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[But in my opinion, the central issues in this area are not statistical but cultural. And what I learned at the workshop confirmed this belief.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>academic-culture science philosophy-of-science the-mangle-in-practice cultural-assumptions authority Misrepresentations</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:1e646cd93370/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy-of-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:the-mangle-in-practice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Misrepresentations"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://unrealnature.wordpress.com/2014/12/08/the-end/">
    <title>The End | Unreal Nature</title>
    <dc:date>2014-12-14T13:57:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://unrealnature.wordpress.com/2014/12/08/the-end/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[In science, by contrast, the scientific text loses its intended primary value once it has been superseded as a means of achieving its stated ends. To be sure we may look at the text in historical retrospect with admiration for its original insights and for the beauty of its vision. We may analyse it in its social and intellectual context with effective results for our understanding of the text. We may even adduce lessons still to be learned from it. But its dominant original intention in establishing an explanatory model for a phenomenon can at any point be subsumed or superseded within a constantly changing body of knowledge. Its primary intention does not now possess any necessary value and the text does not retain its primary function outside its historical context. A work of art is comparably vulnerable to the constantly changing contexts — mental and physical — in which it appears, but it can still assume a primary value with respect to the way in which its visual effects retain their efficacy in serving an end of essentially the same perceptual kind as it was devised to serve. I do not of course wish to imply that these effects will be perceived in a manner identical to that intended by the artist — if such intention is reconstructable at all — but I am speaking more pragmatically of the continuing primary value which a work of art can potentially and actually possess outside its original context.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>literary-criticism art science philosophy-of-science disagree</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:928e393dbdbf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:literary-criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy-of-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disagree"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thearchdruidreport.blogspot.com/2014/12/dark-age-america-sharp-edge-of-shell.html">
    <title>The Archdruid Report: Dark Age America: The Sharp Edge of the Shell</title>
    <dc:date>2014-12-11T12:06:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://thearchdruidreport.blogspot.com/2014/12/dark-age-america-sharp-edge-of-shell.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[That may well happen again. Certainly today’s defenders of science are doing their best to shove a range of scientific viewpoints out the door; the denunciation meted out to Bill Nye for bringing basic concepts from ecology into a discussion where they were highly relevant is par for the course these days. There’s an interesting distinction between the sciences that get this treatment and those that don’t: on the one hand, those that are being flung aside are those that focus on observation of natural systems rather than control of artificial ones; on the other, any science that raises doubts about the possibility or desirability of infinite technological expansion can expect to find itself shivering in the dark outside in very short order. (This latter point applies to other fields of intellectual endeavor as well; half the angry denunciations of philosophy you’ll hear these days from figures such as Neil DeGrasse Tyson, I’m convinced, come out of the simple fact that the claims of modern science to know objective truths about nature won’t stand up to fifteen minutes of competent philosophical analysis.)
]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:gepr politics disintermediation-in-action on-the-falls-of-academies science public-policy models-and-modes</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:f3bb0b3b7f05/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:gepr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-in-action"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:on-the-falls-of-academies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:models-and-modes"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.elsevier.com/reviewers/reviewers-update/registered-reports-a-step-change-in-scientific-publishing">
    <title>Registered Reports: A step change in scientific publishing | Elsevier</title>
    <dc:date>2014-11-19T12:09:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.elsevier.com/reviewers/reviewers-update/registered-reports-a-step-change-in-scientific-publishing</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The unique selling point of Registered Reports is that they eliminate the need for scientists to strive for "publishable results". Registered Reports enshrine the ethos that science earns its stripes from the value of the research question and the rigor of the method, and never from whether the data sing a good tune. This idea is as old as the scientific method itself; in fact, it almost feels wrong to call Registered Reports an innovation in publishing when it is closer to being a restoration– a reinvention of publishing and the peer-review process as it was meant to be.

Some scientists have expressed fears that Registered Reports could restrict creativity by requiring authors to adhere to a fixed research methodology. In fact – and this is important to emphasize – the Registered Reports initiative places no restrictions whatsoever on creativity, flexibility or the reporting of serendipitous findings. While it is true that the pre-specified methods in a Registered Report must be followed, there are no bounds on the reporting of additional unregistered analyses. The only requirement is that such additional material is labelled transparently so that readers know which analyses were pre-registered and which were exploratory.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>science academic-culture publishing citation camel's-nose blogging openness</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:ebf8a9e8f939/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:citation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:camel's-nose"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://unrealnature.wordpress.com/2013/12/14/self-conscious/">
    <title>Self Conscious | Unreal Nature</title>
    <dc:date>2013-12-14T22:50:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://unrealnature.wordpress.com/2013/12/14/self-conscious/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[… The man who made that remark was one of the best of the modern men, and what he had devised had gone down into the whirlpool. “I have tampered enough,” he said. It was not a denial of science. It was a final recognition that science is not enough for man. It is not the road back to the waiting Garden, for that road lies through the heart of man.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>philosophy Loren-Eisley science quotes</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:b29b13f8291c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Loren-Eisley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:quotes"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.aeonmagazine.com/being-human/david-berreby-obesity-era/">
    <title>David Berreby – The obesity era</title>
    <dc:date>2013-07-01T11:57:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.aeonmagazine.com/being-human/david-berreby-obesity-era/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>obesity health science biology cause-and-effect via:adrianh models-and-modes epidemiology</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:92c395a881de/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:obesity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:health"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:biology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cause-and-effect"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:adrianh"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:models-and-modes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:epidemiology"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.4672">
    <title>[1303.4672] Mapping the De Facto Governance of Emerging Science and Technologies</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-12T13:15:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.4672</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[We discuss the use of novel scientometric mapping techniques as informative and interpretative tools to trace the rapid dynamics and uncertainties featuring in Emerging Science and Technologies (ESTs). We show how scientometric mapping techniques can provide perspectives on and crosscuts of the geographical, social, and cognitive spaces in the complex emergence process. Shedding light on these spaces, the set of both intentional and un-intentional, arrangements that are established in the emergence of novel science and technologies--that is, as de facto governance--can be revealed. The informative and interpretative power of these tools resides in the (increasing) speed of processing and their transversal flexibility within and across databases, which themselves are characterized by relative longitudinal and institutional rigidities. Allowing more informed perspectives may play a crucial role in supporting the design of governance that is 'tentative', i.e. forms of governance aiming to address the complexity, interdependencies, and contingencies featuring in ESTs. We discuss the contribution of these mapping techniques to the understanding of the phenomenon of tentative governance of ESTs across three case-studies, namely RNA interference (RNAi), Human Papilloma Virus (HPV), and Thiopurine Methyltransferase (TPMT) testing technologies.]]></description>
<dc:subject>science network-theory social-norms models-and-modes cultural-dynamics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:1b8aa739d573/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:network-theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:models-and-modes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-dynamics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com/2013/02/what-is-basic-research.html">
    <title>Roger Pielke Jr.'s Blog: What is Basic Research?</title>
    <dc:date>2013-02-22T11:50:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com/2013/02/what-is-basic-research.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[It is motherhood, apple pie and all that is good. It is, as Brian Cox would say, axiomatically a good thing. As such, "basic research" as a political symbol has proven to be a big obstacle to science policy research. After all, why question something that is axiomatically good? What are you, anti-science? Further, the inherent virtue of basic research means that precise knowledge of mechanisms of that goodness are not needed.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>science public-policy linguistics that-word research</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:25f3fe473958/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:that-word"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:research"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&amp;id=2698">
    <title>Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-13T14:33:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&amp;id=2698</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>science philosophy-of-science how-science-actually-works philosophy-of-philosophy-too</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:3182e2a73e91/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy-of-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:how-science-actually-works"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy-of-philosophy-too"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=3180">
    <title>Language Log » Straw men and Bee Science</title>
    <dc:date>2011-06-10T14:33:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=3180</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Let me start by saying that there's a way to take all this that makes it entirely correct. The key motive of science is explanation, and it's often essential to abstract away from the complexities of raw observation, and so on. I took courses from Chomsky as an undergraduate and a graduate student, and I'm grateful for what I learned from him, and for the eminently fair way that he always treated me. But increasingly, it seems to me, he has been elevating his personal distaste for the complexities of the real world into a systematic philosophy. To the extent that others accept these views, it excludes them from participation in (what I think are) the most promising and exciting current directions in the sciences of speech and language."]]></description>
<dc:subject>Noam-Chomsky theory-and-practice-sitting-in-a-tree bias science learning-from-data</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:de3d20e7f395/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Noam-Chomsky"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:theory-and-practice-sitting-in-a-tree"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:bias"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:learning-from-data"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.fastcompany.com/1709448/interview-with-a-bee-leaker-beekeeper-tom-theobald-discusses-the-epas-bee-toxic-pesticide-co">
    <title>Beekeeper Who Leaked EPA Documents: &quot;I Don't Think We Can Survive This Winter&quot; | Fast Company</title>
    <dc:date>2010-12-14T00:00:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/1709448/interview-with-a-bee-leaker-beekeeper-tom-theobald-discusses-the-epas-bee-toxic-pesticide-co</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[""They told me that EPA scientists had reviewed the originally lifecycle study and determined it wasn't scientifically sound, and I asked if it had been documented, if there was a hard copy," he says, "The [employee] said yes, and I asked if I could get a copy." And just like that, he had the proof he needed that the EPA had overlooked something that could be killing America's bees."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>astroturf corporatism pesticides ecology science open-science lawsuit</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:35e8cbf7f2b5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:astroturf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:corporatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pesticides"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:ecology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:lawsuit"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/0912.1567">
    <title>[0912.1567] Quantifying the Ease of Scientific Discovery</title>
    <dc:date>2010-05-17T10:35:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/0912.1567</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["It has long been known that scientific output proceeds on an exponential increase, or more properly, a logistic growth curve. The interplay between effort and discovery is clear, and the nature of the functional form has been thought to be due to many changes in the scientific process over time. Here I show a quantitative method for examining the ease of scientific progress, another necessary component in understanding scientific discovery. Using examples from three different scientific disciplines - mammalian species, chemical elements, and minor planets - I find the ease of discovery to conform to an exponential decay. In addition, I show how the pace of scientific discovery can be best understood as the outcome of both scientific output and ease of discovery."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>science arrival-times statistics innovation empirical-economics applicable-to-genetic-programming metering</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:be3c23bdda24/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:arrival-times"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:statistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:empirical-economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:applicable-to-genetic-programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:metering"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.computationalcomplexity.org/2010/05/is-complexity-math-or-science.html">
    <title>Computational Complexity: Is Complexity Math or Science?</title>
    <dc:date>2010-05-14T12:01:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.computationalcomplexity.org/2010/05/is-complexity-math-or-science.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Computational Complexity studies the power and limitations of efficient computation. So is efficient computation purely an abstract mathematical object or is it trying to model a real world phenomenon? I would argue the latter. Efficient computation occurs not just in computers but in biological systems, physical systems, chemical systems, economic systems and much more. Physics focuses on the "what", computational complexity on the "how"."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>computational-complexity false-dichotomies mathematics science self-definition complexity algorithms pragmatics-is-hidden-from-people-doing-it</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:7efca22fbf67/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:computational-complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:false-dichotomies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:mathematics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:self-definition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pragmatics-is-hidden-from-people-doing-it"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://zenpundit.com/?p=3398">
    <title>zenpundit.com » Blog Archive » Epistemology is More Important than Politics</title>
    <dc:date>2010-04-29T14:09:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://zenpundit.com/?p=3398</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Ignorance is nothing to be ashamed of because we are all, in varying degrees, ignorant about many things. The important choice as individuals and as a society is adopting an epistemology of rational-scientific-empiricism that, if steadily applied, allows us to chip away at our ignorance and become aware of our errors and solve problems.  On the other hand, adopting a posture of belligerent, stubborn, defense of our own ignorance by evading facts, logic and the conclusions drawn from the evidence of experience is the road to certain disaster."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>public-policy ignorance anti-intellectualism science science-policy TED</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:542463f6a37b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:ignorance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:anti-intellectualism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science-policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:TED"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.6087">
    <title>[1003.6087] &quot;How many zombies do you know?&quot; Using indirect survey methods to measure alien attacks and outbreaks of the undead</title>
    <dc:date>2010-04-01T13:22:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.6087</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["We originally wrote this article in Word, but then we converted it to Latex to make it look more like science."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>statistics epidemiology public-policy SCIENCE polling social-sciences go-for-the-header</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:08ecb3f2d59b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:statistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:epidemiology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:SCIENCE"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:polling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-sciences"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:go-for-the-header"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://barf.jcowboy.org/">
    <title>BaRf: Bioinformatics aggregated RSS feeds</title>
    <dc:date>2010-03-23T12:20:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://barf.jcowboy.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["BaRf stands for "Bioinformatics aggregated RSS feeds". It provides RSS feeds of titles and abstracts of the most recent papers published by journals that may be of relevance for people involved in Bioinformatics. We don't claim this list is complete - if you have suggestions for journals that should be added (and appear in PubMed) please let us know. The list of currently available journals along with the RSS feed XML links can be found on the right of the page."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>rss science academic-culture publishing journals aggregation</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:499c2bfbe518/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rss"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:journals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:aggregation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://findingada.com/">
    <title>Finding Ada</title>
    <dc:date>2010-03-11T17:44:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://findingada.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Please join us on March 24 for Ada Lovelace Day
Ada Lovelace Day is an international day of blogging (videologging, podcasting, comic drawing etc.!) to draw attention to the achievements of women in technology and science.
Women’s contributions often go unacknowledged, their innovations seldom mentioned, their faces rarely recognised. We want you to tell the world about these unsung heroines, whatever they do. It doesn’t matter how new or old your blog is, what gender you are, what language you blog in, or what you normally blog about – everyone is invited. Just sign the pledge below (click ‘pledge’ after you have completed the reCaptcha) and publish your blog post any time on Wednesday 24th March 2010."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:mcphee blogging mass-action gender social-engineering history science technology writing call-to-action</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:37f81cbeb297/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:mcphee"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:mass-action"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:gender"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-engineering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:call-to-action"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://younglandis.wordpress.com/2010/02/06/futureofnews/">
    <title>A ‘Lowprofit’ Future for Science Journalism? « Thoughts on…</title>
    <dc:date>2010-02-06T20:17:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://younglandis.wordpress.com/2010/02/06/futureofnews/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["But how do you present that disclosure?  A link in each web article that jumps to a spreadsheet of donors and dollar signs, and let the reader judge?  Conversely, many people trust NPR and PBS as a news source, but are satisfied by the simple roll call of sponsors and slogans.

So how do we present this information and context honestly and tactfully?  It reminds me of a discussion at ScienceOnline2010 promoting fact-checking policy disclosures.  What if you could only afford to fact-check 10% of your reporters’ articles?  Does that disclosure give your readers more or less confidence in your service?"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>science writing journalism business-model L3C disclosure conflict-of-interest</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:d75b8d3ac4ef/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-model"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:L3C"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disclosure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conflict-of-interest"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://wordmunger.com/?p=1236">
    <title>Civility and Incivility, Truth and Fiction at #scio10</title>
    <dc:date>2010-01-22T15:42:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://wordmunger.com/?p=1236</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Each of the presenters gave a nice, thoughtful, 5-minute talk about their views on the issue, but what everyone was waiting for was the fireworks when open discussion began. For a while the discussion was tame enough, with everyone exchanging platitudes about how they view the issues. But then things got a LOT more heated...."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>social-norms science academic-culture online ironism-FAIL discourse argument personal-brand disintermediation-in-action</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:d4394b3510c3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:ironism-FAIL"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:discourse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:argument"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:personal-brand"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-in-action"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.0454">
    <title>[0911.0454] The Financial Bubble Experiment: advanced diagnostics and forecasts of bubble terminations</title>
    <dc:date>2009-12-24T16:03:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.0454</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["We continue this protocol until the future date (1 May 2010) at which time we upload our final version of the master document. For this final version, we include the URL of a web site where the .pdf documents of all of our past forecasts can be downloaded and independently checked for consistent MD5 and SHA-2 hashes. For convenience, we will include a summary of all of our forecasts in this final document."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>prediction economics financial-crisis finance science open-science competition public-policy</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:b1d9440d3438/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:prediction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:financial-crisis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:finance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:competition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.rifters.com/crawl/?p=886">
    <title>No Moods, Ads or Cutesy Fucking Icons (Re-reloaded) » Because As We All Know, The Green Party Runs the World.</title>
    <dc:date>2009-11-27T13:03:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.rifters.com/crawl/?p=886</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Science doesn’t work despite scientists being asses. Science works, to at least some extent, because scientists are asses. Bickering and backstabbing are essential elements of the process. Haven’t any of these guys ever heard of “peer review”?
There’s this myth in wide circulation: rational, emotionless Vulcans in white coats, plumbing the secrets of the universe, their Scientific Methods unsullied by bias or emotionalism. Most people know it’s a myth, of course; they subscribe to a more nuanced view in which scientists are as petty and vain and human as anyone (and as egotistical as any therapist or financier), people who use scientific methodology to tamp down their human imperfections and manage some approximation of objectivity."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>science academic-culture cultural-norms cultural-assumptions mythology logic academia</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:c95ab86dae1f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:mythology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:logic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://scienceblogs.com/commonknowledge/2009/10/open_source_science_or_distrib.php">
    <title>Open Source Science? Or Distributed Science? : Common Knowledge</title>
    <dc:date>2009-11-08T19:03:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://scienceblogs.com/commonknowledge/2009/10/open_source_science_or_distrib.php</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Open source, if we view it through a different lens, is really more about a distributed methodology for software development. The burden of creation is widely distributed across a massive community with more-or-less equal access to tools and systems. In this context, the role of the legal tool is more akin to an enzyme. It was an essential piece of a puzzle, but it was not the only piece. In fact, without the rest of the infrastructure (connectivity, tools, and people) the legal tool on its own would not have led us to GNU/Linux."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>openness distributed crowdsourcing science science2.0 community collaboration infrastructure academia academic-culture</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:f75c3b143770/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:distributed"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:crowdsourcing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:infrastructure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v461/n7266/full/461881a.html">
    <title>Stitching science together : Article : Nature</title>
    <dc:date>2009-10-18T10:35:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v461/n7266/full/461881a.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Solving the current problems in science communication requires the intervention of strong companies such as Google. But it will take more than technical advances to provoke scientists into taking full advantage of the web. We need pressure, and perhaps compulsion, from journals and funders to raise publishing standards to the new level made possible by such tools. Google Wave may not be, indeed is probably not, the whole answer. But it points the way to tools that build records and reproducibility into every step. And that has to be good for science."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>communication scientific-computing google-wave collaboration science tools science2.0 academic-culture publishing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:b7a710a07745/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:scientific-computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:google-wave"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:tools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/rushkoff09/rushkoff09_index.html">
    <title>Edge: ECONOMICS IS NOT NATURAL SCIENCE By Douglas Rushkoff</title>
    <dc:date>2009-09-07T17:28:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/rushkoff09/rushkoff09_index.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["We must stop perpetuating the fiction that existence itself is dictated by the immutable laws of economics. These so-called laws are, in actuality, the economic mechanisms of 13th Century monarchs. Some of us analyzing digital culture and its impact on business must reveal economics as the artificial construction it really is. Although it may be subjected to the scientific method and mathematical scrutiny, it is not a natural science; it is game theory, with a set of underlying assumptions that have little to do with anything resembling genetics, neurology, evolution, or natural systems."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>economics economicS-reform received-wisdom history cultural-assumptions science psychology social-psychology academia capitalism money models</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:8211ae94132e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economicS-reform"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:received-wisdom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:money"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:models"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sciplus.com/youneed.cfm">
    <title>American Science &amp; Surplus : Jarvis likes - Jarvis Says You Need...</title>
    <dc:date>2009-06-18T23:34:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.sciplus.com/youneed.cfm</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>surplus makers supplies hobbies engineering magnets throwies science amateurism</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:bf0be4cb8b11/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:surplus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:makers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:supplies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:hobbies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:engineering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:magnets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:throwies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:amateurism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1174">
    <title>PHD Comics: Science News Cycle</title>
    <dc:date>2009-05-20T12:04:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1174</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>science media academia communication it's-more-complicated-than-you-think</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:ab874bdbf866/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:it's-more-complicated-than-you-think"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.garyjones.org/mt/archives/001127.html">
    <title>Muck and Mystery: Amateur Science</title>
    <dc:date>2009-04-07T11:43:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.garyjones.org/mt/archives/001127.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Most of the ag trials that I have read about seem woefully incomplete. They seldom do a competent job of characterizing initial conditions, and seldom do a complete analysis of the interventions they try. For example, they may amend soil with manure or compost, but don't have an accurate analysis of the materials applied, as if all manure or compost was the same.

Use of a SRB for trials could make the trials more useful, but offering biochar testing services might be even better. It would complicate subsequent cross-trial comparison and analysis, but would also yield information about the value of various char formulations. All of the trials would be improved by the use of competent testing to characterize soils, water and even seeds. Records of local micro-climates during the test period would be of value too. Not all places are the same and not all years are the same."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>agriculture soil sustainability amateurism science inquiry experiment open-access crowdsourcing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a85ef3dae255/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:agriculture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:soil"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sustainability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:amateurism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:inquiry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:experiment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:crowdsourcing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://vonahn.blogspot.com/2009/02/academic-publications-20.html">
    <title>Luis von Blog: Academic Publications 2.0</title>
    <dc:date>2009-04-06T11:47:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://vonahn.blogspot.com/2009/02/academic-publications-20.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Can a combination of a wiki, karma, and a voting method like reddit or digg substitute the current system of academic publication?"

[A: yes]
]]></description>
<dc:subject>academia academic-culture credentials citation publishing collaboration science research writing web2.0</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:60d5001af7e2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:credentials"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:citation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:web2.0"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.greenisgood.co.uk/green/pages/show/activeresearch-announce">
    <title>Green is Good : software, science, etc</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-24T17:33:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.greenisgood.co.uk/green/pages/show/activeresearch-announce</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Thanks to O'Reilly and the RailsConf organisers, we're introducing ActiveResearch, an extended satellite meeting at this year's RailsConf in Las Vegas. ActiveResearch is a great opportunity to meet and greet others working with Ruby and Rails in a scientific or technology discipline. We'll have some special guest speakers, a series of more informal lightning talks, finishing things up with a round table discussion of the state of the art, and some drinks and nibbles."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>Ruby Rails science scientific-computing conferences</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:d7829e1ed77f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Ruby"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Rails"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:scientific-computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conferences"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://judeandserene.blogspot.com/2009/03/why-its-ok-to-feel-stupid-especially-in.html">
    <title>ghetto of our mind: Why it's ok to feel stupid - especially in Science</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-21T14:51:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://judeandserene.blogspot.com/2009/03/why-its-ok-to-feel-stupid-especially-in.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I was amazed that the Journal of Cell Science has the wherewithal to publish an essay like this. Kudos to the author of the essay and the editors of the journal. "
]]></description>
<dc:subject>science self-image learning-by-doing academia cultural-norms article stupidity why-we-are-not-cowboys</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:b626d93d60ee/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:self-image"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:learning-by-doing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:article"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:stupidity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:why-we-are-not-cowboys"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.earthmagazine.org/earth/article/1eb-7d9-3-d">
    <title>EARTH Magazine: Rewriting rivers: What it means for river restoration</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-21T14:23:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.earthmagazine.org/earth/article/1eb-7d9-3-d</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["But what if the underlying basis for the model is wrong? That is the message of Merritts and Walters’ Science article. It “was like a bomb, in a good way,” says Frank Pazzaglia, a geology professor at Lehigh University in Bethlehem, Pa. Earlier generations of geomorphologists had recognized the widespread nature of legacy sediments but had attributed them solely to high post-settlement erosion, he says. “More recent workers had focused on the processes, such as how does sediment move, and less on the history. Now we have both pieces. Furthermore, by adding the hard data on milldams, Merritts and Walter have made this legacy better understood.”"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>human ecology manmade-environment dams watershed science geology reclamation restoration modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:9466a6ae03bb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:ecology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:manmade-environment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:dams"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:watershed"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:geology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:reclamation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:restoration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:modeling"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/statins/more-statin-madness/">
    <title>More statin madness | The Blog of Michael R. Eades, M.D.</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-06T20:22:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/statins/more-statin-madness/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Don’t fall for the false promise of this or any other version of an observational study.  These kinds of studies do not prove causality.  Nor do they prove that a drug regimen works.  The patients in this study who religiously took their statins had better all-cause mortality than those who didn’t.  But, as we saw above, adherers always have better all-cause mortality than non-adherers.  In this case, was it that the adherers lived longer or was it that statins conferred some sort of benefit.  We can’t tell.  But we do know that in the real studies, the randomized control trials, statins didn’t do squat, so my vote would be that what we’re seeing here is an adherer effect and not a statin effect."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>medicine experimentation statistics marketing science evidence more-marketing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:33dd67e6dfe0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:medicine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:experimentation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:statistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:marketing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:evidence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:more-marketing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://norvig.com/fact-check.html">
    <title>All we want are the facts, ma'am</title>
    <dc:date>2009-02-24T18:10:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://norvig.com/fact-check.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[In the days when Sussman was a novice, Minsky once came to him as he sat hacking at the PDP-6. 
"What are you doing?", asked Minsky. 
"I am training a randomly wired neural net to play Tic-Tac-Toe," Sussman replied. 
"Why is the net wired randomly?", asked Minsky. 
"I do not want it to have any preconceptions of how to play", Sussman said. 
Minsky shut his eyes. 
"Why do you close your eyes?", Sussman asked his teacher. 
"So that the room will be empty." 
At that moment, Sussman was enlightened.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:arthegall via:cshalizi science models modeling statistics learning-from-data pattern-discovery hubris hyperbole Chris-Anderson that-Greek-dude-with-the-wings-that-melted</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:5943de3ae98e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:arthegall"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:cshalizi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:models"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:modeling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:statistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:learning-from-data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pattern-discovery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:hubris"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:hyperbole"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Chris-Anderson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:that-Greek-dude-with-the-wings-that-melted"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://crookedtimber.org/2009/01/27/charles-stross-book-event/">
    <title>Charles Stross book event — Crooked Timber</title>
    <dc:date>2009-01-28T10:28:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/01/27/charles-stross-book-event/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>Charles-Stross economics science politics literature books</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:1841474d6dbf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Charles-Stross"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:books"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.mygrid.org.uk/tools/taverna/what-is-a-workflow/">
    <title>myGrid » What is a workflow?</title>
    <dc:date>2009-01-07T19:48:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.mygrid.org.uk/tools/taverna/what-is-a-workflow/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In a scientific context what does this mean? The overall project referred to is your analysis. The activities are simple operations within your analysis. All these operations have a certain number of inputs and outputs.  In the case of fetching a DNA sequence, an input may be an identifier of the sequence, whilst the output is a string representing the nucleotide sequence represented by this identifier.
The triggering of activities by other activities are where an operation feeds data into a subsequent operation. For example, the ‘fetch sequence’ operation may feed its output (the string containing sequence ‘ACTG’) into a ‘transcribe’ operation. This would subsequently change the DNA sequence into an RNA sequence. We would then have a simple workflow with one operation, and a link, which looks something like the following:..."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-science science collaboration modeling work communication formalization</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:2eca0e093bb5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:modeling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:formalization"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://wiki.myexperiment.org/index.php/Main_Page">
    <title>Main Page - myExperiment</title>
    <dc:date>2009-01-07T19:44:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://wiki.myexperiment.org/index.php/Main_Page</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>science web2.0 experiment wiki workflow collaboration modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:12ca875c6123/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:web2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:experiment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:wiki"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:workflow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:modeling"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.stanford.edu/class/ee380/">
    <title>Stanford Computer Systems Laboratory Colloquium</title>
    <dc:date>2009-01-07T13:21:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.stanford.edu/class/ee380/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["There is increasing concern about the disappearance of technical knowledge from the public domain, both on grounds that is presents a security danger and because it is economically valuable "Intellectual Property". I argue that this development is not anomalous at all but a great historic trend tied to our transition to the information age. We are in the process of losing a human right that all of us thought we had but actually didn't--the right to learn things we can and better ourselves economically from what we learn. Increasingly, figuring things our for yourself will become theft and terrorism. Increasingly, reason itself will become a crime."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>programming science hacking computer-science presentation intellectual-property terrorism proscription risk</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:72dadcb66090/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:hacking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:computer-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:presentation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:terrorism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:proscription"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:risk"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://paul.kedrosky.com/archives/2009/01/01/lord_kelvin_and.html">
    <title>Paul Kedrosky: Lord Kelvin and Being Usefully Wrong</title>
    <dc:date>2009-01-03T21:05:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://paul.kedrosky.com/archives/2009/01/01/lord_kelvin_and.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Kelvin did not believe that heavier-than-air flying machines were possible and he regarded X-rays as a hoax. Kelvin’s ingenuity was manifested even in cases where his overall predictions were wrong. He gave a lecture on the state of physics at the turn of the twentieth century, and - not unlike Hilbert’s famous lectures in mathematics - claimed that physics was nearly complete and all problems would soon be settled. He mentioned, however, “two clouds on the horizon,” the unexpected behavior of ether in the Michelson-Morley experiment and the problem of the spectrum of the black body radiation. His genius as a physicist was manifested by the fact that of all the scores of open problems in physics present at the time (as there always are), he pinpointed the two problems that subsequently led to revolutions: the ether problem led to relativity, and black body radiation to quantum theory."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>innovation science chance-favors-the-prepared-mind generalism specialism</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:1476e566b075/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:chance-favors-the-prepared-mind"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:generalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:specialism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://boinc.berkeley.edu/">
    <title>BOINC</title>
    <dc:date>2008-12-12T13:09:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://boinc.berkeley.edu/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>grid-computing volunteerism crowdsourcing computation collaboration programming development community science research tools activism networking distributed opensource</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:983cc5e3404e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:grid-computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:volunteerism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:crowdsourcing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:computation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:development"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:tools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:activism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:networking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:distributed"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:opensource"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.steamthing.com/2008/11/a-big-question-about-the-templeton-foundation.html">
    <title>Steamboats Are Ruining Everything: A big question about the Templeton Foundation</title>
    <dc:date>2008-11-24T13:09:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.steamthing.com/2008/11/a-big-question-about-the-templeton-foundation.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I'd be curious to know how you folks at the Templeton Foundation reconcile the high rhetoric displayed here with the rather low and brutal practice of taking a civil right away from a minority group."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>political-activism conservatism religion science Christianity Templeton boycott</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:b7b7da434bed/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:political-activism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conservatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:religion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Christianity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Templeton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:boycott"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.oddhead.com/2008/11/14/the-predict-flu-using-search-study-you-didnt-hear-about/">
    <title>The “predict flu using search” study you didn’t hear about: Oddhead Blog: Prediction Markets, Gambling, Electronic Commerce, Artificial Intelligence: David Pennock: Yahoo! Research</title>
    <dc:date>2008-11-14T12:49:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.oddhead.com/2008/11/14/the-predict-flu-using-search-study-you-didnt-hear-about/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["in the world of science, being first means a great deal and can be the determining factor in whether a study gets published. The truth is, although the efforts were independent, ours was published first — and Clinical Infectious Diseases scooped Nature — a decent consolation prize amid the go-google din."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:arthegall forcshalizi science epidemiology publication MSM mainstream media Google-shadow citation marketing academia</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:c8f61900fe38/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:arthegall"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:forcshalizi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:epidemiology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:MSM"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:mainstream"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Google-shadow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:citation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:marketing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/1266869.html">
    <title>Opinion - My View: What's so wasteful about funding discovery? - sacbee.com</title>
    <dc:date>2008-10-12T13:53:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/1266869.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Not all science needs to have a purpose. The nature of humans is that, sometimes, they simply want to know. Everything else is just a bonus.

Srinivasa Ramanujan and Albert Einstein, the two scientific geniuses of the 20th century, made their earliest discoveries while working as clerks, not as professors working on taxpayer-funded projects; but why risk, in the 21st century, that some diamond might remain forever unearthed for want of a government grant?"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>science politics academia basic-science funding government grants anti-intellectualism open-science cultural-norms</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:197819e10a23/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:basic-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:funding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:grants"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:anti-intellectualism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-08/yu-gd080408.php">
    <title>'Cosmic ghost' discovered by volunteer astronomer</title>
    <dc:date>2008-08-09T11:43:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-08/yu-gd080408.php</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>crowdmining crowdsourcing galaxy-zoo science observation classification innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:01f8598d539c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:crowdmining"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:crowdsourcing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:galaxy-zoo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:observation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:classification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:innovation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://xkcd.com/">
    <title>xkcd - A webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language - By Randall Munroe</title>
    <dc:date>2008-06-12T23:52:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://xkcd.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>science science! Science!! MATHEMATICS cultural-norms academia research</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:f8822cad8413/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science!"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Science!!"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:MATHEMATICS"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:research"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/Media/releases/ssc2008-10/release.shtml">
    <title>Press Release: Two of the Milky Way's Spiral Arms Go Missing</title>
    <dc:date>2008-06-07T12:52:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/Media/releases/ssc2008-10/release.shtml</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[You mean all my old Traveller maps are wrong now?
]]></description>
<dc:subject>astronomy galaxy science geography</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:ac9721a6d212/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:astronomy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:galaxy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:geography"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-06/uom-tsf060408.php">
    <title>Target support for young scientists, says panel/Mote</title>
    <dc:date>2008-06-07T12:28:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-06/uom-tsf060408.php</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["If America is to maintain its scientific and technological edge, it needs to inspire and support its most talented scientists and engineers through the early stages of their careers..."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>science pedagogy public-policy funding academia innovation economics engineering philanthropy</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:9d1b5d959151/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:funding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:engineering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philanthropy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kk.org/quantifiedself/2008/05/annals-of-selfexperiment-seth.php">
    <title>The Quantified Self</title>
    <dc:date>2008-06-01T11:30:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kk.org/quantifiedself/2008/05/annals-of-selfexperiment-seth.php</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>personalized-science insomnia data-driven science contingent hypotheses</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:2421d0cd0a30/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:personalized-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:insomnia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:data-driven"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:contingent"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:hypotheses"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sagemath.org/">
    <title>SAGE: Open Source Mathematics Software</title>
    <dc:date>2008-05-28T11:16:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.sagemath.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>via:nequitans science computing mathematics open-source scicomp platform mma Python</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:3f48dada7e16/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:nequitans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:mathematics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-source"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:scicomp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:platform"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:mma"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Python"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emergent.brynmawr.edu/eprg/?page=EmergentPhenomena">
    <title>Emergent Phenomenon Research Group: EmergentPhenomena</title>
    <dc:date>2008-04-23T13:07:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://emergent.brynmawr.edu/eprg/?page=EmergentPhenomena</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[loving "GOD LOVES CONWAY BUT HATES WOLFRAM". Thank you!
]]></description>
<dc:subject>emergence science culture tribes</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:39d1400b7ff9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:emergence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:tribes"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/SPT/">
    <title>Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology</title>
    <dc:date>2008-03-09T12:28:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/SPT/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>academia science engineering philosophy journals</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:9cff91829c56/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:engineering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:journals"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2008/02/28/open-science-open-seminars/">
    <title>Open Science, Open Seminars « UK Web Focus</title>
    <dc:date>2008-03-09T12:27:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2008/02/28/open-science-open-seminars/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>openness collaboration science pedagogy conversation digitization distribution academia social-norms</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:7e7e4501c70a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:digitization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:distribution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/03/rationality-q-1.html">
    <title>Overcoming Bias: Rationality Quotes 11</title>
    <dc:date>2008-03-05T13:37:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/03/rationality-q-1.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>quotes philosophy science learning psychology amusing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:0e49eaab4b5b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:quotes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:amusing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://imomus.livejournal.com/356429.html">
    <title>Click opera - A post-Blink essentialist, looking at Asian space</title>
    <dc:date>2008-03-05T12:55:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://imomus.livejournal.com/356429.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Reality," said Willem de Kooning, "is a slipping glimpse"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>psychology generalism models mental-models cultural-norms anthropology artist science grokking</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:633182b0f7d4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:generalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:models"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:mental-models"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:anthropology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:artist"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:grokking"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.arunn.net/blog/2008/02/23/guilty-of-plagiarizing-seventy-research-papers/">
    <title>Unruled Notebook » Blog Archive » Guilty of Plagiarizing Seventy Research Papers</title>
    <dc:date>2008-02-26T11:38:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.arunn.net/blog/2008/02/23/guilty-of-plagiarizing-seventy-research-papers/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The argument that early sharing of research will "let people steal your ideas" is put paid by the simple fact that PEOPLE WILL STEAL THEM ANYWAY. Instead, openness brings plagiarism to light faster.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>academia cultural-norms social-norms publishing plagiarism ethics science</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:36af22f6d43d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:plagiarism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.syrexe.com/">
    <title>Scholarly Research Exchange</title>
    <dc:date>2008-02-26T11:31:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.syrexe.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[via Peter Suber
]]></description>
<dc:subject>openness open-access open-science publishing peer-review academia science collaboration community</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:7ecbdd4bb135/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:peer-review"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:community"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.tomnackidart.com/">
    <title>Thomas Nackid Art &amp; Design index</title>
    <dc:date>2008-02-23T12:01:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.tomnackidart.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>artist illustration portfolio science scientific-illustration visualization graphic-design hey-i-know-this-dude</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:49806eb8cd56/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:artist"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:illustration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:portfolio"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:scientific-illustration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:visualization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:graphic-design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:hey-i-know-this-dude"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2008/02/10/how-to-be-wrong-continued/">
    <title>Seth’s blog » Blog Archive » How to Be Wrong (continued)</title>
    <dc:date>2008-02-18T00:55:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2008/02/10/how-to-be-wrong-continued/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>bias research explanation data exploration exploitation models science worldview</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:3ddbc211993d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:bias"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:explanation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:exploration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:exploitation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:models"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:worldview"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.dreamsongs.com/Feyerabend/Feyerabend.html">
    <title>The Feyerabend Project</title>
    <dc:date>2008-02-12T13:53:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.dreamsongs.com/Feyerabend/Feyerabend.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["...[G]iven any rule, however ‘fundamental’ or ‘necessary’ for science, there are always circumstances when it is advisable not only to ignore the rule, but to adopt its opposite."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>Feyerabend philosophy science philosophy-of-science method methodologies design creativity models</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:bc92fbc34e64/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Feyerabend"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy-of-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:method"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:methodologies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:creativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:models"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://scienceblogs.com/greengabbro/2008/02/why_i_dont_use_the_bpr3_icon.php">
    <title>Green Gabbro : Why I Don't Use the BPR3 Icon</title>
    <dc:date>2008-02-05T12:06:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://scienceblogs.com/greengabbro/2008/02/why_i_dont_use_the_bpr3_icon.php</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>via:tsuomela via:cshalizi blogging science academia personal-brand professionalism publishing can't-we-have-a-revolution-once-that's-not-run-by-boring-people-trying-to-replace-boring-people?</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:8d6ed944c66e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:tsuomela"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:cshalizi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:personal-brand"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:professionalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:can't-we-have-a-revolution-once-that's-not-run-by-boring-people-trying-to-replace-boring-people?"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2008/30jan_mercurysurprise.htm?list214102">
    <title>NASA - Surprises from Mercury</title>
    <dc:date>2008-01-31T01:39:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2008/30jan_mercurysurprise.htm?list214102</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[So it begins. We know where the Shadows lie.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>NASA Mercury planetology science astronomy space-exploration Babylon-5</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:ff773804598e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:NASA"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Mercury"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:planetology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:astronomy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:space-exploration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Babylon-5"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>