<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (Vaguery)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from Vaguery</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07740"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://smallpondscience.com/2013/10/20/this-attempt-to-create-an-inclusive-professional-blog/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://books.google.com/books?printsec=frontcover&amp;id=MrsR88JvxOcC&amp;output=html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07740">
    <title>[1802.07740] Machine Theory of Mind</title>
    <dc:date>2018-02-24T11:52:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07740</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Theory of mind (ToM; Premack & Woodruff, 1978) broadly refers to humans' ability to represent the mental states of others, including their desires, beliefs, and intentions. We propose to train a machine to build such models too. We design a Theory of Mind neural network -- a ToMnet -- which uses meta-learning to build models of the agents it encounters, from observations of their behaviour alone. Through this process, it acquires a strong prior model for agents' behaviour, as well as the ability to bootstrap to richer predictions about agents' characteristics and mental states using only a small number of behavioural observations. We apply the ToMnet to agents behaving in simple gridworld environments, showing that it learns to model random, algorithmic, and deep reinforcement learning agents from varied populations, and that it passes classic ToM tasks such as the "Sally-Anne" test (Wimmer & Perner, 1983; Baron-Cohen et al., 1985) of recognising that others can hold false beliefs about the world. We argue that this system -- which autonomously learns how to model other agents in its world -- is an important step forward for developing multi-agent AI systems, for building intermediating technology for machine-human interaction, and for advancing the progress on interpretable AI.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>artificial-intelligence relevance machine-learning to-write-about collective-intelligence agents consider:the-mangle</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:17d7a10aee81/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:artificial-intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:relevance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:machine-learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collective-intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:agents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:consider:the-mangle"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://smallpondscience.com/2013/10/20/this-attempt-to-create-an-inclusive-professional-blog/">
    <title>This attempt to create an inclusive professional blog | Small Pond Science</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-21T12:22:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://smallpondscience.com/2013/10/20/this-attempt-to-create-an-inclusive-professional-blog/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I used to be an avid reader of the more “clubby” forms of science blog, but the constant barrage of in-group references and, frankly, ass-kissing reverence for certain heroes among the in-crowd get tiresome even for someone who is familiar with the lingo. In addition, these in group dynamics also produced a feeling in that community that because he murmured the right phrases and supported the right causes, he must be beyond reproach. I would suggest this power dynamic actually empowered his unprofessional behavior.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>academic-culture blogging social-norms social-networks signs-and-signals relevance</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a494ad99e6e1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:signs-and-signals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:relevance"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://books.google.com/books?printsec=frontcover&amp;id=MrsR88JvxOcC&amp;output=html">
    <title>The Myth of Print Culture: Essays on ... - Google Book Search</title>
    <dc:date>2008-10-14T22:28:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://books.google.com/books?printsec=frontcover&amp;id=MrsR88JvxOcC&amp;output=html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["...How are such things as editions, states, variants, or even the book itself to be discussed? To what extent is a printed book singular? And to what extent does the (inaccurate) scholarly assumption that it is not, enable reasonable and useful discussion of such objects to proceed?"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:britta books bibliomania scholarship models academia Platonism printing publishing assumptions cultural-norms relevance</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:40cc52f6b323/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:britta"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:bibliomania"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:scholarship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:models"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Platonism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:printing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:relevance"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>