<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (Vaguery)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from Vaguery</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.15297"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://hbr.org/2017/08/how-the-imagined-rationality-of-engineering-is-hurting-diversity-and-engineering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.0041"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://unrealnature.wordpress.com/2014/07/26/not-the-light-that-guides-them/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://laboratorium.net/archive/2012/03/06/cato_versus_caesar"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/09/david-graeber-on-the-invention-of-money-–-notes-on-sex-adventure-monomaniacal-sociopathy-and-the-true-function-of-economics.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cheerfulsw.com/2010/dont-listen-to-le-corbusier%E2%80%94or-jakob-nielsen/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/benkler09/benkler09_index.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bacon.umcs.lublin.pl/~ktalmont/pdf/Red%20reason.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/02/hemlock-parable.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/01/the-two-party-s.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rjwaldmann.blogspot.com/2007/06/possible-efficiency-gains-due-to-taxes.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.15297">
    <title>[2403.15297] Sphere Neural-Networks for Rational Reasoning</title>
    <dc:date>2025-08-22T12:52:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.15297</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The success of Large Language Models (LLMs), e.g., ChatGPT, is witnessed by their planetary popularity, their capability of human-like communication, and also by their steadily improved reasoning performance. However, it remains unclear whether LLMs reason. It is an open problem how traditional neural networks can be qualitatively extended to go beyond the statistic paradigm and achieve high-level cognition. Here, we present a novel qualitative extension by generalising computational building blocks from vectors to spheres. We propose Sphere Neural Networks (SphNNs) for human-like reasoning through model construction and inspection, and develop SphNN for syllogistic reasoning, a microcosm of human rationality. SphNN is a hierarchical neuro-symbolic Kolmogorov-Arnold geometric GNN, and uses a neuro-symbolic transition map of neighbourhood spatial relations to transform the current sphere configuration towards the target. SphNN is the first neural model that can determine the validity of long-chained syllogistic reasoning in one epoch without training data, with the worst computational complexity of O(N). SphNN can evolve into various types of reasoning, such as spatio-temporal reasoning, logical reasoning with negation and disjunction, event reasoning, neuro-symbolic unification, and humour understanding (the highest level of cognition). All these suggest a new kind of Herbert A. Simon's scissors with two neural blades. SphNNs will tremendously enhance interdisciplinary collaborations to develop the two neural blades and realise deterministic neural reasoning and human-bounded rationality and elevate LLMs to reliable psychological AI. This work suggests that the non-zero radii of spheres are the missing components that prevent traditional deep-learning systems from reaching the realm of rational reasoning and cause LLMs to be trapped in the swamp of hallucination.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>neural-networks representation formal-logic ontology to-understand consider:classic-AI consider:member-of-networks rationality machine-learning</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:336f8efa870b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:neural-networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:representation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:formal-logic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:ontology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-understand"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:consider:classic-AI"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:consider:member-of-networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rationality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:machine-learning"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://hbr.org/2017/08/how-the-imagined-rationality-of-engineering-is-hurting-diversity-and-engineering">
    <title>How the Imagined “Rationality” of Engineering Is Hurting Diversity — and Engineering</title>
    <dc:date>2017-08-10T21:52:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://hbr.org/2017/08/how-the-imagined-rationality-of-engineering-is-hurting-diversity-and-engineering</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Just how common are the views on gender espoused in the memo that former Google engineer James Damore was recently fired for distributing on an internal company message board? The flap has women and men in tech — and elsewhere — wondering what their colleagues really think about diversity. Research we’ve conducted shows that while most people don’t share Damore’s views, male engineers are more likely to.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>corporatism rationality bad-actors objectivism startup-culture-must-die</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:dd0f8c9ef67f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:corporatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rationality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:bad-actors"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:objectivism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:startup-culture-must-die"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.0041">
    <title>[1405.0041] Evolving useful delusions: Subjectively rational selfishness leads to objectively irrational cooperation</title>
    <dc:date>2014-10-16T12:34:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.0041</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[We introduce a framework within evolutionary game theory for studying the distinction between objective and subjective rationality and apply it to the evolution of cooperation on 3-regular random graphs. In our simulations, agents evolve misrepresentations of objective reality that help them cooperate and maintain higher social welfare in the Prisoner's dilemma. These agents act rationally on their subjective representations of the world, but irrationally from the perspective of an external observer. We model misrepresentations as subjective perceptions of payoffs and quasi-magical thinking as an inferential bias, finding that the former is more conducive to cooperation. This highlights the importance of internal representations, not just observed behavior, in evolutionary thought. Our results provide support for the interface theory of perception and suggest that the individual's interface can serve not only the individual's aims, but also society as a whole, offering insight into social phenomena such as religion.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>philosophy-of-science evolutionary-economics game-theory rationality philosophy rather-interesting agent-based nudge-targets altruism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:78821e2e011c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy-of-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:evolutionary-economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:game-theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rationality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:agent-based"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:nudge-targets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:altruism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://unrealnature.wordpress.com/2014/07/26/not-the-light-that-guides-them/">
    <title>Not the Light that Guides Them | Unreal Nature</title>
    <dc:date>2014-07-27T11:51:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://unrealnature.wordpress.com/2014/07/26/not-the-light-that-guides-them/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["… Contradictory truths do not reside in the same mind — only different programs, each of which encloses different truths and interests, even if these truths have the same name."

]]></description>
<dc:subject>philosophy rationality history-is-a-feature-not-a-bug to-read tolerance pluralism democracy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:6e5c25ef9ee1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rationality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:history-is-a-feature-not-a-bug"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-read"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:tolerance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pluralism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:democracy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://laboratorium.net/archive/2012/03/06/cato_versus_caesar">
    <title>The Laboratorium : Cato Versus Caesar</title>
    <dc:date>2012-03-07T23:09:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://laboratorium.net/archive/2012/03/06/cato_versus_caesar</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I could not tell you how many times I’ve encountered libertarian arguments about law that assume that individuals can and ought to use contracts to protect themselves against just this sort of contingency. Don’t worry about users clicking “I agree” to overreaching terms of service; if they truly cared about the terms, they’d negotiate for better ones. Don’t worry about people who refuse to buy health insurance; they’re making a rational choice for themselves. Don’t worry about minority shareholders, don’t worry about franchisees, don’t worry about all the other groups that find themselves on the wrong end of a bargain that always seems to tip against them in the long run—if they wanted better protections, they could and should have negotiated for them up front.

Except they don’t. They never do. And really. If the uber-libertarians of the Cato institute can’t watch out for themselves, what hope is there for the rest of us?"]]></description>
<dc:subject>like-civilization-libertarianism-would-be-a-good-idea libertarianism politics pawns-being-pawned rationality pragmatism-it-ain't</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:e84517c30adc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:like-civilization-libertarianism-would-be-a-good-idea"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:libertarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pawns-being-pawned"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rationality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pragmatism-it-ain't"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/09/david-graeber-on-the-invention-of-money-–-notes-on-sex-adventure-monomaniacal-sociopathy-and-the-true-function-of-economics.html">
    <title>David Graeber: On the Invention of Money – Notes on Sex, Adventure, Monomaniacal Sociopathy and the True Function of Economics « naked capitalism</title>
    <dc:date>2011-09-13T12:57:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/09/david-graeber-on-the-invention-of-money-–-notes-on-sex-adventure-monomaniacal-sociopathy-and-the-true-function-of-economics.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["At this point, it’s easier to understand why economists feel so defensive about challenges to the Myth of Barter, and why they keep telling the same old story even though most of them know it isn’t true. If what they are really describing is not how we ‘naturally’ behave but rather how we are taught to behave by the market—well who, nowadays, is doing most of the actual teaching? Primarily, economists. The question of barter cuts to the heart of not only what an economy is—most economists still insist that an economy is essentially a vast barter system, with money a mere tool (a position all the more peculiar now that the majority of economic transactions in the world have come to consist of playing around with money in one form or another) [10]—but also, the very status of economics: is it a science that describes of how humans actually behave, or prescriptive, a way of informing them how they should? (Remember, sciences generate hypothesis about the world that can be tested against the evidence and changed or abandoned if they don’t prove to predict what’s empirically there.)

Or is economics instead a technique of operating within a world that economists themselves have largely created? Or is it, as it appears for so many of the Austrians, a kind of faith, a revealed Truth embodied in the words of great prophets (such as Von Mises) who must, by definition be correct, and whose theories must be defended whatever empirical reality throws at them—even to the extent of generating imaginary unknown periods of history where something like what was originally described ‘must have’ taken place?"]]></description>
<dc:subject>economics rationality conservatism David-Graeber anthropology debt Austrian-school takedown pragmatism-it-ain't</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a28fc2f7eb2a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rationality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conservatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:David-Graeber"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:anthropology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:debt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Austrian-school"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:takedown"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pragmatism-it-ain't"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://cheerfulsw.com/2010/dont-listen-to-le-corbusier%E2%80%94or-jakob-nielsen/">
    <title>Don’t listen to Le Corbusier—or Jakob Nielsen : Cheerful</title>
    <dc:date>2010-04-27T00:04:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://cheerfulsw.com/2010/dont-listen-to-le-corbusier%E2%80%94or-jakob-nielsen/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["RATIONALITY’S NOT ALL IT’S CRACKED UP TO BE"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>rationality design design-autism pragmatism subjectivism planning-be-damned</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a17aae512e0c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rationality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:design-autism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pragmatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:subjectivism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:planning-be-damned"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/benkler09/benkler09_index.html">
    <title>Edge: THE END OF UNIVERSAL RATIONALITY: A Talk with Yochai Benkler</title>
    <dc:date>2009-08-16T17:05:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/benkler09/benkler09_index.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Where we are now, and we already know that we are there, is in a much more permeable and fluid society and a much more permeable cultural environment where the difference between producers and consumers is much more blurred. Where this category of users has become absolutely central to everything we do. So when we talk about newspapers, we have to think about the users who communicate with a commercial organization like TPM, the users who basically get together and make their own new party presses, like DailyKos or Townhall, like the users who make up YouTube, like the users who make up Wikipedia. Suddenly you have radically decentralized practical capacity to act. And what do people do? They act."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>panarchy economics collaboration intellectual-property disintermediation-targets disintermediation-in-action publishing business philosophy sustainability activism networks behavior rationality</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:f06f74c8597a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:panarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-targets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-in-action"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sustainability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:activism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:behavior"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rationality"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bacon.umcs.lublin.pl/~ktalmont/pdf/Red%20reason.pdf">
    <title>http://bacon.umcs.lublin.pl/~ktalmont/pdf/Red reason.pdf</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-13T12:03:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://bacon.umcs.lublin.pl/~ktalmont/pdf/Red%20reason.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["1) Rational solutions need not be universal, instead they will be only effective in appropriate contexts. 

2) Rationally acceptable conclusions do not have to follow necessarily from the information given, as acceptance is not to be understood in terms of a formal relationship between propositions but in terms of a practical commitment. 

3) The rationality of the conclusions is not necessarily determined by whether they conform to the appropriate rules, indeed the primary focus is removed from conclusions and placed upon actions that are taken on the basis of beliefs and methods that are all subject to further criticism and development. "
]]></description>
<dc:subject>rationality naturalism pragmatism modeling planning engineering heuristics philosophy-of-science philosophy-of-engineering</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:81cefbefe24a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rationality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:naturalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pragmatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:modeling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:planning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:engineering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:heuristics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy-of-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy-of-engineering"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/02/hemlock-parable.html">
    <title>Overcoming Bias: The Parable of Hemlock</title>
    <dc:date>2008-02-04T12:02:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/02/hemlock-parable.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Logic stays true, wherever you may go,
So logic never tells you where you live."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>reasoning philosophy statistics Bayesianism logic learning rationality</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:c078aa52bee2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:reasoning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:statistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Bayesianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:logic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rationality"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/01/the-two-party-s.html">
    <title>Overcoming Bias: The Two-Party Swindle</title>
    <dc:date>2008-01-04T13:04:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/01/the-two-party-s.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Even dishonesty is not required..."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>politics sociology social-norms party rationality bias</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:d4c48a158b38/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sociology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:party"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rationality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:bias"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://rjwaldmann.blogspot.com/2007/06/possible-efficiency-gains-due-to-taxes.html">
    <title>Robert's Stochastic thoughts</title>
    <dc:date>2007-06-21T15:12:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://rjwaldmann.blogspot.com/2007/06/possible-efficiency-gains-due-to-taxes.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>academia economics papers altruism sociology cultural-norms rationality</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:d9072833bacd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:papers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:altruism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sociology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rationality"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>