<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (Vaguery)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from Vaguery</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://c4sif.org/2011/07/nina-paley-culture-is-anti-rivalrous/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/awwsw/http-goes-bad-20100602.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://go-to-hellman.blogspot.com/2010/01/offline-book-lending-costs-us.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/08/03/20-things-ive-stolen/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/001141.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://c4sif.org/2011/07/nina-paley-culture-is-anti-rivalrous/">
    <title>Nina Paley: Culture is Anti-Rivalrous</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-10T11:06:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://c4sif.org/2011/07/nina-paley-culture-is-anti-rivalrous/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Culture is anti-rivalrous. The more people know and sing a song, the more cultural value it has. The more people watch my film Sita Sings the Blues, or read my comic strip Mimi & Eunice, the happier I’ll be, so please go do that now and then come back and read the rest of this paragraph. The more people know a movie or TV show, the more cultural value it has. Monty Python references attest to the cultural value of Monty Python – we even use the word “spam” because of it. Shakespeare‘s works are culturally valuable, and phrases from them live on in the language even apart from the plays (“I think she doth protest to much,” etc.). The more people refer to Monty Python and Shakespeare, the more you just gotta see em, amiright? Or not, it doesn’t matter whether you see them, you’re already speaking them. That all culture is a kind of language, I’ll leave for another discussion."]]></description>
<dc:subject>intellectual-property economics property copyright commons cultural-assumptions</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:4c1ab8f0fed4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:commons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-assumptions"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/awwsw/http-goes-bad-20100602.html">
    <title>When HTTP Goes Bad</title>
    <dc:date>2010-06-04T10:37:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/awwsw/http-goes-bad-20100602.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["This memo considers three radical ideas applying to the Web, not necessarily as serious proposals (although given support they could be turned into such) but as thought experiments or fantasies meant to sharpen the discussion of the "meaning" of URIs and other current issues of web architecture. The first fantasy is the idea that a URI's meaning is in how it is used, not what it "identifies". The second is the prospect of second sourcing for URI behavior. The third is the idea of encyclopedia-style documentation for URIs."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>semantic-web commons social-norms resources best-practices property thought-experiments via:arthegall</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:575317730cf3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:semantic-web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:commons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:resources"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:best-practices"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:thought-experiments"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:arthegall"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://go-to-hellman.blogspot.com/2010/01/offline-book-lending-costs-us.html">
    <title>Go To Hellman: Offline Book &quot;Lending&quot; Costs U.S. Publishers Nearly $1 Trillion</title>
    <dc:date>2010-01-23T13:31:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://go-to-hellman.blogspot.com/2010/01/offline-book-lending-costs-us.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Hot on the heels of the story in Publisher's Weekly that "publishers could be losing out on as much $3 billion to online book piracy" comes a sudden realization of a much larger threat to the viability of the book industry. Apparently, over 2 billion books were "loaned" last year by a cabal of organizations found in nearly every American city and town. Using the same advanced projective mathematics used in the study cited by Publishers Weekly, Go To Hellman has computed that publishers could be losing sales opportunities totaling over $100 Billion per year, losses which extend back to at least the year 2000. These lost sales dwarf the online piracy reported yesterday, and indeed, even the global book publishing business itself."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>publishing libraries copyright business intellectual-property satire business-culture property disintermediation-jokes</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:5789cb00a34c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:libraries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:satire"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-jokes"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/08/03/20-things-ive-stolen/">
    <title>Joho the Blog » 20 things I’ve stolen</title>
    <dc:date>2008-08-05T11:36:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2008/08/03/20-things-ive-stolen/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I have retold the joke about the man who meets a pirate in a bar without ever once explicitly acknowledging that I was not its author."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>property intellectual-property law irony</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:4cddb6bc5fd8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:irony"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/001141.html">
    <title>Coding Horror: Open Wireless and the Illusion of Security</title>
    <dc:date>2008-06-29T13:27:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/001141.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["You have the illusion of security. And that is far more dangerous than no security at all."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>security openness cultural-norms crime property privacy</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:4261adb7ac18/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:security"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:crime"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:privacy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>