<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (Vaguery)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from Vaguery</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2022/01/10/the-processual-book-how-can-we-move-beyond-the-printed-codex/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bookandsword.com/2016/02/13/the-classical-style-of-argument/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bookandsword.com/2021/03/13/why-digitizing-sources-is-important/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://libretexts.org/mission.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.neroeditions.com/cognition-communism-and-theft/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2020/the-library-commons/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.02689"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2020/02/03/a-broken-system-why-literature-searching-needs-a-fair-revolution/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/the-value-of-openness-in-scientific-problem-solving"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://popjournal.ca/call"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://books.google.com/books?id=nYWJDAAAQBAJ&amp;dq=Archipelago+of+Protocols&amp;source=gbs_navlinks_s"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://inessential.com/2018/08/08/the_public_square"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://boingboing.net/2017/10/10/library-public-domain.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://vimeo.com/234305186"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.08472"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.elsevier.com/reviewers/reviewers-update/registered-reports-a-step-change-in-scientific-publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pockettactics.com/features/ownership-becoming-obsolete-lex-goes-free-day-open-sources-code-forever/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://simplystatistics.org/2014/06/30/piketty-in-r-markdown-we-need-some-help-from-the-crowd/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://carlboettiger.info/2012/09/28/Welcome-to-my-lab-notebook.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://wcm1.web.rice.edu/open-notebook-history.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ebensorkin.wordpress.com/2013/05/23/merriweather-italic-is-live/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ivory.idyll.org/blog/blog-practicing-open-science.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.poynter.org/how-tos/newsgathering-storytelling/writing-tools/208214/why-we-should-stop-criminalizing-practices-that-are-confused-with-plagiarism/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/01/aaron-swartzs-politics.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sarahwerner.net/blog/index.php/2012/08/a-new-contributors-contact/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mixedrealities.com/2012/11/09/p2p-foundation-blog-archive-fred-turner-on-burning-man-as-the-cultural-infrastructure-for-commons-based-peer-production/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/columns-and-blogs/cory-doctorow/article/53544-doubling-down-on-drm.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cybernetickinkwell.com/2012/04/02/on-a-definition-of-open-humanities/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://opensource.com/government/11/9/open-states-transparency-state-governments-using-open-data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://punctumbooks.com/blog/everything-we-think-can-in-principle-be-thought-by-someone-else-a-plea-for-open-scholarship/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.infotoday.com/it/jul11/Suber-Leader-of-a-Leaderless-Revolution.shtml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.ted.com/2010/05/25/lessons_from_fa/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.foundhistory.org/2010/12/02/stuff-digital-humanists-like/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tunes.org/overview.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.languagehat.com/archives/003916.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2010/04/28/mobile-platforms/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.boingboing.net/2010/03/08/lawrence-lessig-scar-1.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+boingboing%2FiBag+(Boing+Boing)"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://seekingalpha.com/article/190633-open-letter-to-yahoo-on-its-open-strategy-to-make-the-web-more-open-and-relevant?source=feed"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://scienceblogs.com/effectmeasure/2010/02/the_copyright_mafia_makes_me_s.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-02/uoia-dos022410.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://zenhabits.net/2010/02/completion-principles/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=45&amp;aid=176417"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.gcbl.org/blog/marc-lefkowitz/city-planning-throws-weight-behind-open-access-innerbelt-bridge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://mashable.com/2010/01/22/open-source-san-francisco/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6709919.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2670/2366"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://scienceblogs.com/commonknowledge/2009/10/open_source_science_or_distrib.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/the-logic-of-collective-action/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/10/30/oregon-once-again-cl.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jchrisa.net/drl/_design/sofa/_show/post/What-CouchDB-brings-to-HTML5"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.dfa.org/about/approach.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://opencloudconsortium.org/about.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.core77.com/blog/news/2009_open_architecture_challenge_awards_14572.asp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://open.umich.edu/community/umich.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://seekingalpha.com/article/159660-newspapers-and-the-meaning-of-membership?source=feed"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://abouttag.blogspot.com/2009/09/permissions-worth-getting-excited-about.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/node/5505"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://infochimps.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2009/03/open-source-har.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://enthusiasm.cozy.org/archives/2009/03/what-a-mess"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arborwiki.org/city/Susan_Pollay"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.collabforge.net/drupal/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://a2geeks.org/display/geek/Data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://a2-park.appspot.com/#_home"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://trek.tumblr.com/post/86449862/dda-info-policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.voiptechchat.com/voip/255/a2dda-blocks-asterisk-parking-data/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://earningmyturns.blogspot.com/2009/02/scaling-up-intellectual-authority.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://openeverything.wik.is/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/massimo-menichinelli-open-p2p-design-as-enabling-open-p2p-systems/2008/11/24"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.librarything.com/thingology/2009/02/evil-326.php"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2022/01/10/the-processual-book-how-can-we-move-beyond-the-printed-codex/">
    <title>The Processual Book. How Can We Move Beyond the Printed Codex? | Impact of Social Sciences</title>
    <dc:date>2022-03-07T17:28:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2022/01/10/the-processual-book-how-can-we-move-beyond-the-printed-codex/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Processual books can, for example, make the various contributors to scholarly research more visible and the different ways they shape research as it comes into being. They can also highlight the material agency of publications and how it matters whether research is published as a blogpost or an academic monograph, openly or closed, and how different media and the various cultural practices established around them enact different forms of interaction and call into being different communities of engagement.

When boundaries between research and publishing become less clear-cut, this has direct implications for the role of the publisher too. Instead of publishing being ‘outsourced’ to a publisher when a research project ends, processual publishing might ask authors and publishers to collaborate more and earlier in the research cycle and to reconsider at what point publishing expertise (e.g., reviewing, copy-editing, marketing) is most useful. Yet processual publishing practices also make visible how scholars are increasingly taking on publishing functions, having to present themselves as ‘academic brands’ online and through their academic networks to create engagement around their work. Many of the platforms that scholars publish their research-in-progress on (including academic social networking sites such as Academia.edu) are also extractive, building their business models around this engagement.

Processual publishing will continue to be faced with these kinds of questions and new forms of extraction and solidification (around the claiming of ownership, the creation of marketable commodities, and the metrification of engagement) will continue to be introduced as these practices become more widespread. But remaining aware of when and for what reason research is made public might help scholars and publishers make more informed publishing decisions and might help them envision and create a different—and perhaps better—scholarly communication system.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>printing publishing openness philosophy humanities living-texts change-the-words</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:38a8025ce396/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:printing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:humanities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:living-texts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:change-the-words"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.bookandsword.com/2016/02/13/the-classical-style-of-argument/">
    <title>The Classical Style of Argument – Book and Sword</title>
    <dc:date>2022-02-10T15:11:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.bookandsword.com/2016/02/13/the-classical-style-of-argument/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This style of argument also has a name, and its an ugly one: appeal to authority. That name appears on lists of logical fallacies because simply invoking an authority does not explain why one should believe them over those who say differently. In case of Ada Lovelace’s mathematical works, the debate is clearly tied to powerful ideals and political factions in the broader culture, and it is very tempting to accuse those who say things one does not wish to hear of being biased. The only way to answer that charge is to test their arguments for coherence with the evidence rather than for political allegiance. But because neither side quotes or cites evidence and explains how they think it supports their opinion, this is hard to do. (For the record, Padua says that her graphic novel is full of footnotes and quotes from sources, and if so that puts her ahead of many promoters or critics of Ada Lovelace’s importance).

]]></description>
<dc:subject>humanities argumentation digitization openness to-write-about consider:racism consider:reconstruction</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:2fe68622e8bc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:humanities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:argumentation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:digitization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:consider:racism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:consider:reconstruction"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.bookandsword.com/2021/03/13/why-digitizing-sources-is-important/">
    <title>Why Digitizing Sources is Important – Book and Sword</title>
    <dc:date>2022-02-10T15:09:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.bookandsword.com/2021/03/13/why-digitizing-sources-is-important/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[As human beings and as scientists in the early 21st century, we have a crisis of epistemology and misinformation. Science is a system for distributed, verified trust and as the rate of publications increases, and new discoveries lead to conclusions which threaten more and more wealthy actors, that system has been breaking down. There is lots of talk about blame, but I don’t find that is helpful. Often, what seem to be two opposed factions lean on each other like tired wrestlers, and use the commotion of their fighting to keep their supporters too busy to ask awkward questions about the gap between the policies that their representatives say they support and the policies they enact. Instead of laying blame, I would like to talk about one of the things we are doing to solve this.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>digitization responsible-academia openness argumentation humanities</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:e4ba8e451e5a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:digitization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:responsible-academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:argumentation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:humanities"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://libretexts.org/mission.html">
    <title>LibreTexts - Free The Textbook</title>
    <dc:date>2021-05-28T13:50:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://libretexts.org/mission.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The LibreTexts mission is to unite students, faculty and scholars in a cooperative effort to develop an easy-to-use online platform for the construction, customization, and dissemination of open educational resources (OER) to reduce the burdens of unreasonable textbook costs to our students and society.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>publishing textbooks to-watch openness open-access academic-culture curricula law-vs-scholarship</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:b222a5f81d8e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:textbooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-watch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:curricula"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:law-vs-scholarship"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.neroeditions.com/cognition-communism-and-theft/">
    <title>Cognition, Communism, and Theft | NERO Editions</title>
    <dc:date>2021-03-20T14:45:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.neroeditions.com/cognition-communism-and-theft/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[When the shadow library Sci-hub was founded in 2011, it was meant to remove “barriers in the way of science”, in response to the high cost of research papers behind paywalls. Since then, its founder Kazakhstani programmer Alexandra Elbakyan often became a target of lawsuits for copyright infringement. The platform currently hosts more than 85 million scientific papers. This conversation previously appeared in a shorter version on Netzpolitik.org. 

]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:mymarkup openness corporatism academic-culture propaganda publishing business-interests</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:3a7b9eb59d41/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:mymarkup"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:corporatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:propaganda"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-interests"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2020/the-library-commons/">
    <title>The Library Commons: An Imagination and an Invocation – In the Library with the Lead Pipe</title>
    <dc:date>2020-10-19T13:43:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2020/the-library-commons/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[In Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Nobel Prize winner Elinor Ostrom writes, “All efforts to organize collective action, whether by an external ruler, an entrepreneur, or a set of principals who wish to gain collective benefits, must address a common set of problems. These have to do with coping with free-riding, solving commitment problems, arranging for the supply of new institutions, and monitoring individual compliance with a set of rules” (Ostrom 1990, 27). In addressing existing social systems, particularly those that collectively govern the use of non-renewable resources such as water ways, Ostrom proved that economically alternative situations could be beneficial to all parties involved. Her writing is rooted in traditional economic reform – the commons in this definition provide a necessary alternative to the free market, rather than an overhaul of capitalism.  In other words, Ostrom addresses what Lewis Hyde calls “The Tragedy of Unmanaged, Laissez-Faire, Common-Pool Resources with Easy Access for Non Communicating, Self-Interested Individuals”2 (Hyde 2010, 44).

To contrast Ostrom’s fundamentally reformist vision of the commons, theorists Fred Moten and Stefano Harney present another form of commons: the undercommons. The undercommons is a state of “permanent fugitivity,” one that functions through “stealing” and “collective orientation” as a mode of functioning within and beyond institutions. The critical academic in this worldview questions everything, creates solidarity networks, and shares an aversion to neoliberal professionalization of communities, particularly academic communities. The undercommons can provide an important reframing of the commons, particularly when considering it from an historical and anti-colonialist point of view. In considering the institution, Moten and Harney write that libraries in the academy are “this incredible gathering of resources… it’s nice to have books,” but that the undercommons is “a kind of comportment or ongoing experiment with and as the general antagonism… it’s almost impossible that it could be matched up with particular forms of institutional life” (Moten and Harney 2013, 112). Institutionally, the work in the undercommons is the work of the coalition, of the social, and against the neoliberal institution that precludes resistance and sociality.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>humanities openness academic-culture to-write-about digitization access-and-accessibility</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:645abe41ec06/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:humanities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:digitization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:access-and-accessibility"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.02689">
    <title>[1802.02689] Digital Data Archives as Knowledge Infrastructures: Mediating Data Sharing and Reuse</title>
    <dc:date>2020-05-18T21:15:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.02689</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Digital archives are the preferred means for open access to research data. They play essential roles in knowledge infrastructures - robust networks of people, artifacts, and institutions - but little is known about how they mediate information exchange between stakeholders. We open the "black box" of data archives by studying DANS, the Data Archiving and Networked Services institute of The Netherlands, which manages 50+ years of data from the social sciences, humanities, and other domains. Our interviews, weblogs, ethnography, and document analyses reveal that a few large contributors provide a steady flow of content, but most are academic researchers who submit datasets infrequently and often restrict access to their files. Consumers are a diverse group that overlaps minimally with contributors. Archivists devote about half their time to aiding contributors with curation processes and half to assisting consumers. Given the diversity and infrequency of usage, human assistance in curation and search remains essential. DANS' knowledge infrastructure encompasses public and private stakeholders who contribute, consume, harvest, and serve their data - many of whom did not exist at the time the DANS collections originated - reinforcing the need for continuous investment in digital data archives as their communities, technologies, and services evolve.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>academic-culture digitization library-science data-repositories openness not-quite-open-enough le-sigh</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:1a84ac8e5920/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:digitization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:library-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:data-repositories"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:not-quite-open-enough"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:le-sigh"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2020/02/03/a-broken-system-why-literature-searching-needs-a-fair-revolution/">
    <title>A broken system – why literature searching needs a FAIR revolution | Impact of Social Sciences</title>
    <dc:date>2020-05-02T13:11:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2020/02/03/a-broken-system-why-literature-searching-needs-a-fair-revolution/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[By developing academic search systems in this way, we can futureproof research discovery against increasingly appreciated limitations, like bias and lack of comprehensiveness, and make it an equitable and FAIR practice. In addition, we need to educate users to be able to decide which systems fit their search needs, so they use the best systems, in the best way. In this regard, we want to use our research to make the search system landscape more transparent. We hope to raise awareness among academics to be more attentive, and search system providers to elevate their quality to the necessary standard in science – for better search and better results.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>findability academic-culture publishing openness open-access library-science search-engines FAIR however:what-about-novelty?</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:40b2fe674b72/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:findability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:library-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:search-engines"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:FAIR"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:however:what-about-novelty?"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/the-value-of-openness-in-scientific-problem-solving">
    <title>The Value of Openness in Scientific Problem Solving - Harvard Business School Working Knowledge</title>
    <dc:date>2020-05-02T13:07:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/the-value-of-openness-in-scientific-problem-solving</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Openness and free information sharing amongst scientists are supposed to be core norms of the scientific community. However, many studies have shown that these norms are not universally followed. Lack of openness and transparency means that scientific problem solving is constrained to a few scientists who work in secret and who typically fail to leverage the entire accumulation of scientific knowledge available. We present evidence of the efficacy of problem solving when disclosing problem information. The method's application to 166 discrete scientific problems from the research laboratories of 26 firms is illustrated. Problems were disclosed to over 80,000 independent scientists from over 150 countries. We show that disclosure of problem information to a large group of outside solvers is an effective means of solving scientific problems. The approach solved one-third of a sample of problems that large and well-known R&D-intensive firms had been unsuccessful in solving internally. Problem-solving success was found to be associated with the ability to attract specialized solvers with range of diverse scientific interests. Furthermore, successful solvers solved problems at the boundary or outside of their fields of expertise, indicating a transfer of knowledge from one field to others.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>openness open-access publishing academic-culture Coscience to-write-about</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:c02ae04934ab/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Coscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://popjournal.ca/call">
    <title>Open Call | Pop!</title>
    <dc:date>2020-03-19T12:47:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://popjournal.ca/call</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[What do we imagine when we imagine open infrastructures? What does this concept entail, in its vision, and in its drive to realization? This issue of Pop! is devoted to both imaginative and empirical investigations into what open infrastructures might be and might provide for us. We invite submissions – from scholars, librarians, developers, and anyone else who is interested in this topic – that explore the possibilities and help clarify and articulate the opportunities, challenges, upsides, and pitfalls of re-thinking the infrastructure of scholarly communications.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>openness academic-culture intellectual-property CFP to-watch</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:bac8a27577aa/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:CFP"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-watch"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://books.google.com/books?id=nYWJDAAAQBAJ&amp;dq=Archipelago+of+Protocols&amp;source=gbs_navlinks_s">
    <title>Archipelago of Protocols. Aristide Antonas - Aristide Antonas, Thanos Zartaloudis - Google Books</title>
    <dc:date>2019-03-24T12:13:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://books.google.com/books?id=nYWJDAAAQBAJ&amp;dq=Archipelago+of+Protocols&amp;source=gbs_navlinks_s</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The concept of Urban Protocol names a strategy concerning the condition of Athens today. It would serve as an experimental pseudo-methodology that faces the condition of the city. The Urban Protocols are meant to introduce legal temporary occupancies of the abandoned city center that will be accepted and controlled by a municipal authority; the purpose of an Urban Protocol would be to establish cluster-like micro-legislative constructions with communal functions. Urban Protocols are formed as systems of rules. Using a video game terminology we may say that the Urban Protocols are “play-tested” in the city, performed and improved via Internet. The system of rules they represent could be transformed and re-established easily.

The Urban Protocol challenges the relation between the city and the Internet; the concept of user would function better for its performance than the one of citizen. Nevertheless its most sophisticated part would have to deal with the relation between user and citizen. Its most challenging legislative part is ruled by the relationship between the Internet and the state; the Internet is understood as the quick functional basis for the formation, installation and function of an Urban Protocol.]]></description>
<dc:subject>to-read social-engineering urban-planning collective-organization design-patterns openness</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:ea8a88feef5f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-read"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-engineering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:urban-planning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collective-organization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:design-patterns"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://inessential.com/2018/08/08/the_public_square">
    <title>inessential: The Public Square</title>
    <dc:date>2018-08-25T12:00:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://inessential.com/2018/08/08/the_public_square</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Twitter is not the public square. It just wants you to think it is. The web itself is the public square.]]></description>
<dc:subject>social-media decentralization openness yeah-what-he-said</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:895e7d6bd2c4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:decentralization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:yeah-what-he-said"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://boingboing.net/2017/10/10/library-public-domain.html">
    <title>An obscure copyright law is letting the Internet Archive distribute books published 1923-1941 / Boing Boing</title>
    <dc:date>2017-10-10T21:56:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://boingboing.net/2017/10/10/library-public-domain.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Section 108h of the Copyright Act gives libraries the power to scan and serve copies of out-of-print books published between 1923 and 1941; it's never been used before but now the mighty Internet Archive is giving it a serious workout, adding them to their brilliantly named Sonny Bono Memorial Collection (when Bono was a Congressman, he tried to pass a law that would extend copyright to "forever less a day" and was instrumental in moving millions of works from the public domain back into copyright, "orphaning" them so that no one could preserve them and no one knew who the copyrights belonged to).]]></description>
<dc:subject>copyright digitization to-learn-about to-write-about openness commons</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a27f159e0c47/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:digitization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-learn-about"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:commons"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://vimeo.com/234305186">
    <title>Foreplay keynote - Aral Balkan on Vimeo</title>
    <dc:date>2017-09-25T12:04:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://vimeo.com/234305186</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Foreplay keynote - Aral Balkan]]></description>
<dc:subject>security corporatism openness public-policy video keynote</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a1822ee229f1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:security"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:corporatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:keynote"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.08472">
    <title>[1604.08472] Beyond the black box</title>
    <dc:date>2016-05-08T12:35:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.08472</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[We describe the role the open-source software community plays in fixing bugs through a case study of a problem with integer determinant computations in SageMath.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>openness open-source learning-in-public working-in-public anecdote bug</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:ca6526a517db/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-source"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:learning-in-public"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:working-in-public"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:anecdote"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:bug"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.elsevier.com/reviewers/reviewers-update/registered-reports-a-step-change-in-scientific-publishing">
    <title>Registered Reports: A step change in scientific publishing | Elsevier</title>
    <dc:date>2014-11-19T12:09:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.elsevier.com/reviewers/reviewers-update/registered-reports-a-step-change-in-scientific-publishing</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The unique selling point of Registered Reports is that they eliminate the need for scientists to strive for "publishable results". Registered Reports enshrine the ethos that science earns its stripes from the value of the research question and the rigor of the method, and never from whether the data sing a good tune. This idea is as old as the scientific method itself; in fact, it almost feels wrong to call Registered Reports an innovation in publishing when it is closer to being a restoration– a reinvention of publishing and the peer-review process as it was meant to be.

Some scientists have expressed fears that Registered Reports could restrict creativity by requiring authors to adhere to a fixed research methodology. In fact – and this is important to emphasize – the Registered Reports initiative places no restrictions whatsoever on creativity, flexibility or the reporting of serendipitous findings. While it is true that the pre-specified methods in a Registered Report must be followed, there are no bounds on the reporting of additional unregistered analyses. The only requirement is that such additional material is labelled transparently so that readers know which analyses were pre-registered and which were exploratory.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>science academic-culture publishing citation camel's-nose blogging openness</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:ebf8a9e8f939/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:citation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:camel's-nose"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.pockettactics.com/features/ownership-becoming-obsolete-lex-goes-free-day-open-sources-code-forever/">
    <title>&quot;Ownership is becoming obsolete&quot;: LEX goes free for a day, open sources code forever - Pocket Tactics</title>
    <dc:date>2014-07-25T12:26:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.pockettactics.com/features/ownership-becoming-obsolete-lex-goes-free-day-open-sources-code-forever/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Kurt Bieg of Simple Machine has decided to wade into this debate. Actually, he’s not wading — he’s diving in head-first, and throwing his co-workers in, too. Bieg is open-sourcing all of his studio’s games, starting with word game LEX. “We believe ownership is becoming obsolete,” Bieg told me. And if you’re surprised by that sentiment, he was just getting warmed up.


]]></description>
<dc:subject>cultural-dynamics openness worklife Post-Normal disintermediation-in-action</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:b64ad22b20fd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-dynamics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:worklife"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Post-Normal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-in-action"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://simplystatistics.org/2014/06/30/piketty-in-r-markdown-we-need-some-help-from-the-crowd/">
    <title>Piketty in R markdown – we need some help from the crowd | Simply Statistics</title>
    <dc:date>2014-07-08T12:27:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://simplystatistics.org/2014/06/30/piketty-in-r-markdown-we-need-some-help-from-the-crowd/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[As a way to entice you to participate, here is one interesting thing we found. We don't know enough economics to know if what we are finding is "right" or not, but one interesting thing I found is that the x-axes in the excel files are really distorted. For example here is Figure 1.1 from the Excel files where the ticks on the x-axis are separated by 20, 50, 43, 37, 20, 20, and 22 years.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>piketty economics controversy crowdsourcing openness replication fine-toothed-combs-distributed-everywhere</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:81b8535243c6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:piketty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:controversy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:crowdsourcing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:replication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:fine-toothed-combs-distributed-everywhere"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://carlboettiger.info/2012/09/28/Welcome-to-my-lab-notebook.html">
    <title>Welcome to my Lab Notebook - Reloaded</title>
    <dc:date>2013-05-28T21:04:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://carlboettiger.info/2012/09/28/Welcome-to-my-lab-notebook.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Welcome to my lab notebook, version 3.0. My original open lab notebooks began on the wiki platform OpenWetWare, moved to a personally hosted Wordpress platform, and now run on a Jekyll-powered platform (site-config), but the basic idea remains the same. For completeness, earlier entries from both platforms have been migrated here. Quoting from my original introduction to the Wordpress notebook:

]]></description>
<dc:subject>academic-culture openness open-science the-mangle-in-practice</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:bd8040c5d120/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:the-mangle-in-practice"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://wcm1.web.rice.edu/open-notebook-history.html">
    <title>Open Notebook History | W. Caleb McDaniel</title>
    <dc:date>2013-05-28T21:01:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://wcm1.web.rice.edu/open-notebook-history.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The above considerations have led me to try an experiment: I’m going to see what it’s like to keep an open notebook for my new book project.

The platform I have chosen is an open wiki run on Gitit, which has built in version control by Git. This makes it possible for me to edit my notes locally in my own text editor, using Pandoc and Markdown, or online using Gitit’s web interface. Most importantly, however, Gitit automates the process of keeping track of changes I have made to individual pages or the site as a whole. The activity page, for example, keeps a running list of which notes I have changed, together with links that allow immediate comparisons between the latest version and the last one.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>openness open-notebook history the-mangle-in-practice academic-culture path-as-scholarship</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:7e8e4b3d8455/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-notebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:the-mangle-in-practice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:path-as-scholarship"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ebensorkin.wordpress.com/2013/05/23/merriweather-italic-is-live/">
    <title>Merriweather Italic is live | Merriweather Font</title>
    <dc:date>2013-05-24T11:36:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://ebensorkin.wordpress.com/2013/05/23/merriweather-italic-is-live/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Merriweather Italic is live"   < Woot!]]></description>
<dc:subject>typography openness type-design fonts via:adrianh</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:874d033caed2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:typography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:type-design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:fonts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:adrianh"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ivory.idyll.org/blog/blog-practicing-open-science.html">
    <title>Why I don't &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; practice open science</title>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T23:16:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://ivory.idyll.org/blog/blog-practicing-open-science.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Overall, it's been an interesting personal journey from "blind optimism" about openness to a more, ahem, "nuanced" set of thoughts (i.e., I was wrong before :). I'd be interested to hear what other people have to say... drop me a note or make a comment.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>openness open-science folks-I-know coscience the-mangle-in-practice other-people-are-part-of-the-mangle</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a6bacb8255a2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:folks-I-know"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:coscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:the-mangle-in-practice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:other-people-are-part-of-the-mangle"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.poynter.org/how-tos/newsgathering-storytelling/writing-tools/208214/why-we-should-stop-criminalizing-practices-that-are-confused-with-plagiarism/">
    <title>Why we should stop criminalizing practices that are confused with plagiarism | Poynter.</title>
    <dc:date>2013-03-31T13:03:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.poynter.org/how-tos/newsgathering-storytelling/writing-tools/208214/why-we-should-stop-criminalizing-practices-that-are-confused-with-plagiarism/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[There has been too much loose talk about plagiarism since I first wrote about the topic in 1983. I’ll share some of the blame. The result is that serious acts of literary theft have been mixed up with trivial ones. Carelessness has been mislabeled as corruption. Clear norms of personal morality and professional ethics have been confused with standards and practices.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>plagiarism academic-culture modes-and-mores writing ethics openness authority-as-debt</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:1a49b18ce281/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:plagiarism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:modes-and-mores"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority-as-debt"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/01/aaron-swartzs-politics.html">
    <title>Aaron Swartz’s Politics « naked capitalism</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-14T12:13:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/01/aaron-swartzs-politics.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Aaron suffered from depression, but that is not why he died. Aaron is dead because the institutions that govern our society have decided that it is more important to target geniuses like Aaron than nurture them, because the values he sought – openness, justice, curiosity – are values these institutions now oppose. In previous generations, people like Aaron would have been treasured and recognized as the remarkable gifts they are. We do not live in a world like that today. And Aaron would be the first to point out, if he could observe the discussion happening now, that the pressure he felt from the an oppressive government is felt by millions of people, every year. I’m glad his family have not let the justice system off the hook, and have not allowed this suicide to be medicalized, or the fault of one prosecutor. What happened to Aaron is not isolated to Aaron, but is the flip side of the corruption he hated.

As we think about what happened to Aaron, we need to recognize that it was not just prosecutorial overreach that killed him. That’s too easy, because that implies it’s one bad apple. We know that’s not true. What killed him was corruption. Corruption isn’t just people profiting from betraying the public interest. It’s also people being punished for upholding the public interest. In our institutions of power, when you do the right thing and challenge abusive power, you end up destroying a job prospect, an economic opportunity, a political or social connection, or an opportunity for media. Or if you are truly dangerous and brilliantly subversive, as Aaron was, you are bankrupted and destroyed. There’s a reason whistleblowers get fired. There’s a reason Bradley Manning is in jail. There’s a reason the only CIA official who has gone to jail for torture is the person – John Kiriako - who told the world it was going on. There’s a reason those who destroyed the financial system “dine at the White House”, as Lawrence Lessig put it. There’s a reason former Senator Russ Feingold is a college professor whereas former Senator Chris Dodd is now a multi-millionaire. There’s a reason DOJ officials do not go after bankers who illegally foreclose, and then get jobs as partners in white collar criminal defense. There’s a reason no one has been held accountable for decisions leading to the financial crisis, or the war in Iraq. This reason is the modern ethic in American society that defines success as climbing up the ladder, consequences be damned. Corrupt self-interest, when it goes systemwide, demands that it protect rentiers from people like Aaron, that it intimidate, co-opt, humiliate, fire, destroy, and/or bankrupt those who stand for justice.

More prosaically, the person who warned about the downside in a meeting gets cut out of the loop, or the former politician who tries to reform an industry sector finds his or her job opportunities sparse and unappealing next to his soon to be millionaire go along get along colleagues. I’ve seen this happen to high level former officials who have done good, and among students who challenge power as their colleagues go to become junior analysts on Wall Street. And now we’ve seen these same forces kill our friend.]]></description>
<dc:subject>for-aaronsw activism politics progressivism memory openness eulogies</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a742801e98d0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:for-aaronsw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:activism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:progressivism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:memory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:eulogies"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://sarahwerner.net/blog/index.php/2012/08/a-new-contributors-contact/">
    <title>a new contributor’s contact! » Wynken de Worde</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-13T15:32:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://sarahwerner.net/blog/index.php/2012/08/a-new-contributors-contact/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[And one plea to all of you: Ask for what’s in your right to have. Please do this. And please tell us about doing this. Scholarly publishing is in a world of change right now, and we are all finding our way. My experience is that most publishers are finding their ways just as much as most authors are. The more we work together and share our experiences, the more chance we all have of finding a fair way forward.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>for-aaronsw intellectual-property academic-culture publishing contracts advice openness open-access</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:326b52bc9d6c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:for-aaronsw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:contracts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:advice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.mixedrealities.com/2012/11/09/p2p-foundation-blog-archive-fred-turner-on-burning-man-as-the-cultural-infrastructure-for-commons-based-peer-production/">
    <title>MixedRealities | Fred Turner on Burning Man as the Cultural Infrastructure for Commons-Based Peer Production</title>
    <dc:date>2012-12-22T13:52:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.mixedrealities.com/2012/11/09/p2p-foundation-blog-archive-fred-turner-on-burning-man-as-the-cultural-infrastructure-for-commons-based-peer-production/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[“Fred Turner discusses his opinions on the social phenomenon of Burning Man and how he thinks the ideals of the festival apply to the marketplace that is evolving in our society, specifically in the Silicon Valley.”

]]></description>
<dc:subject>commons community cultural-dynamics engineering-culture sharing openness</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:dc05cee42b48/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:commons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-dynamics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:engineering-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sharing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/columns-and-blogs/cory-doctorow/article/53544-doubling-down-on-drm.html">
    <title>Doubling Down on DRM</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-14T11:25:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/columns-and-blogs/cory-doctorow/article/53544-doubling-down-on-drm.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I know of at least one large agency that has told Hachette that it will not market books to them so long as this policy is in force. And Hachette’s authors should pay attention because, in the end, it is they who will suffer from the effects of DRM. Readers probably won’t remember who published the book that nuked itself due to a DRM misfire or was lost due to a platform switch. But they’ll remember the writer whose book they paid for and to which they lost access. And remember this: the phone is fast becoming an e-reader of choice, and readers usually cycle out phones with their cellular contracts every 12–18 months. This is going to be a hell of a ride."]]></description>
<dc:subject>DRM intellectual-property publishing disintermediation-in-action openness</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:55a64edd91da/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:DRM"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-in-action"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://cybernetickinkwell.com/2012/04/02/on-a-definition-of-open-humanities/">
    <title>Cybernetick Inkwell · On a definition of “open humanities”</title>
    <dc:date>2012-04-03T11:02:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://cybernetickinkwell.com/2012/04/02/on-a-definition-of-open-humanities/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The digital humanities are a part of the open humanities to the extent that those same values are held, though of course the purely digital elements (the code, the markup, the hardware) are unique to the digital humanities and live largely outside of OH. That being said, much of DH—the commitment to open source, the collaborative nature of the field, the interdisciplinarity—is open."]]></description>
<dc:subject>openness digital-humanities the-inevitability-of-enclosures cultural-dynamics theory-as-code</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:83a4c1929041/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:digital-humanities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:the-inevitability-of-enclosures"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-dynamics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:theory-as-code"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://opensource.com/government/11/9/open-states-transparency-state-governments-using-open-data">
    <title>Open states: Transparency for state governments using open data | opensource.com</title>
    <dc:date>2011-10-01T12:47:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://opensource.com/government/11/9/open-states-transparency-state-governments-using-open-data</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[What is the biggest impact Open States has had to date?

I suppose it depends on what kind of impact we're talking about. Governments are slowly coming to terms with this and we've seen states like Minnesota and Kansas start to move towards machine-readable access of their data—and I think we can take some of the credit for that. A big part of it is that they just have smart people working there that get the importance of making this data available in as many ways as possible.

I'm particularly partial to the impact that the project has had on individuals. Sunlight open sources everything we do, and as a result, we have over 130 projects on GitHub. Most of these projects aren't things that the average developer uses, so they don't see a ton of attention from outside developers. Open States has been a real success in a unique way—it has gotten developers that were otherwise unaware of open government involved. We've had contributions from approximately 50 developers, ranging from minor tweaks to a parser to fix an error that a user noticed to entire states contributed. I think it has made a real impact in providing a gentle introduction for developers looking for a way to contribute.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-access openness government2.0 transparency commons</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:e7774f133f00/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:government2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:transparency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:commons"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://punctumbooks.com/blog/everything-we-think-can-in-principle-be-thought-by-someone-else-a-plea-for-open-scholarship/">
    <title>Everything We Think Can in Principle Be Thought By Someone Else: A Plea for Open Scholarship</title>
    <dc:date>2011-09-25T22:26:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://punctumbooks.com/blog/everything-we-think-can-in-principle-be-thought-by-someone-else-a-plea-for-open-scholarship/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["This is just to say that if we think keeping our scholarly work primarily out of public sight [except for the occasional conference presentation] until its penultimate moment of publication in a conventional venue such as the academic journal or book, at which point quite a few years of our lives [mainly spent in the solitude of studies and libraries or other semi-private spaces where we could manage a foothold] may have been devoted to that work whose “arrival” in print may even occur long after we have moved on to other projects, then we risk working too much in the dark, apart from the world which has bequeathed to us our objects and methods of study and reflection [I might also add here that this traditional way of doing things also keeps our work sequestered within the academy, and does not allow us to reach a more broadly public audience, which, in my mind, is a real perversion of the term "humanities"]. We also do our work largely apart from the very peers whom we hope will welcome and even love it when it is “finished.” Yes, for the kind of work we do, quiet is required, even long stretches of solitude [because this is when ideas often arrive to us that could never have arrived any other way and also because it's hard to translate medieval Latin when people are milling all around you], but you’ve got to get outside every now then. And maybe also reflect on the fact that even the supposed inside/outside divide is primarily an illusion."]]></description>
<dc:subject>academic-culture openness publishing gatekeeping coscience</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:cb7b758bbb24/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:gatekeeping"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:coscience"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.infotoday.com/it/jul11/Suber-Leader-of-a-Leaderless-Revolution.shtml">
    <title>INTERVIEW - Suber: Leader of a Leaderless Revolution</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-15T13:14:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.infotoday.com/it/jul11/Suber-Leader-of-a-Leaderless-Revolution.shtml</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["  Q: As your answer indicates, there is more to OA than green and gold alone; there is also gratis and libre OA. In 2008, you produced a grid demonstrating the four-way relationship among the different types of OA. Can you expand on this, and outline the relative merits of gratis and libre OA? 

A: Gratis OA is simply free of charge. But it’s not more free than that. Gratis literature may stand under all-rights-reserved copyrights and give users no more rights than they already had under fair use (or fair dealing).

Libre OA is free of charge and free of at least some copyright and licensing restrictions. Libre literature stands under some-rights-reserved copyrights, at most, and permits uses that exceed fair use. The advantage of libre OA is that researchers needn’t slow down to ask permission for legitimate scholarly uses that exceed fair use, needn’t take the risk of proceeding without permission, and needn’t err on the side of non-use. By the way, the grid you mentioned was merely a preview of a longer article, which explained the gratis/libre distinction in much more detail."]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-access publishing academic-culture openness heroes</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:92eab8043e89/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:heroes"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.ted.com/2010/05/25/lessons_from_fa/">
    <title>TED Blog | Lessons from fashion's free culture: Johanna Blakley on TED.com</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-29T19:44:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.ted.com/2010/05/25/lessons_from_fa/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Copyright law’s grip on film, music and software barely touches the fashion industry … and fashion benefits in both innovation and sales, says Johanna Blakley. At TEDxUSC 2010, she talks about what all creative industries can learn from fashion’s free culture."]]></description>
<dc:subject>intellectual-property openness innovation capitalization reuse mashups economics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:9b534bbe6e3a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:capitalization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:reuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:mashups"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.foundhistory.org/2010/12/02/stuff-digital-humanists-like/">
    <title>Stuff Digital Humanists Like: Defining Digital Humanities by its Values</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-20T12:09:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.foundhistory.org/2010/12/02/stuff-digital-humanists-like/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Here are five to start us off:

Like: Twitter / Don’t like: Facebook. The first thing we have to mention, which we have mentioned a few times already, is Twitter. The reasons we like Twitter are complex and I won’t pretend to understand them all, but I’ll throw out a few suggestions. First, its “follow” rather than “friend” model is more open, allows for the collaboration and non-hierarchy that the Internet and digital humanities values. Second, and related to this, Twitter is the place where content-creators—journalists, writers, artists, web developers, etc.—tend to hang out. We overlap with those communities, or at least seek to overlap with them, in productive ways. They are the distant nodes from which we hope new innovations will come. Third, Twitter, in the way we use it, is mostly about sharing ideas whereas Facebook is about sharing relationships. Scholars are good at ideas, maybe less so at relationships.
Like: Agile development / Dislike: long planning cycles. The second thing I’ll mention is agile development, the philosophy of “releasing early and often,” which we do not only with software/code but also with our ideas and writing when we Tweet, blog, and chat. We do this as good neighbors but also in the hope that releasing our code and ideas will improve with contributions from end points of our networks.
Like: DIY / Dislike: Outsourcing. Most of the most successful digital humanities projects are those done by scholar/technologists not those imagined by scholars and implemented by technologists. Likewise, the most successful digital humanists are scholars who know the technology, often those who are self-taught, not ones who seek a client-vendor relationship with technologists. We take this insight to heart in our hiring at CHNM, looking for people with formal training in the humanities and self-taught tech skills.
Like: PHP / Dislike: C++. Fourth, and following from the last point, we like PHP not C++. This is another way of saying we like the transparent, easy-to-learn, and simple (if sometimes ham-handed) technologies of the Web more than the more powerful, more sophisticated, more elegant, but less approachable compiled code of the desktop. A focus on getting the most out of simple, transparent, vernacular technologies allows us to keep the door to the field open to new entrants.
Like: Extramural funding / Dislike: Intramural funding. In one respect, this may seem obvious: everybody likes grants. In another respect it’s probably going a little too far to say we don’t like intramural funding: it is essential to building and maintaining capacity for our centers and staff. But it seems to me the most successful digital humanities projects are those that result from competitive grant making processes, especially the federal grant making process. Why is this? I can point to at least three reasons: 1) Attracting grant money keeps us innovating, which, like it or not, is a premium in our business. Grants are given for new work, not for more of the same. 2) Writing grants and serving on panels keep us in conversation with the field. We have to keep current and keep in touch with one another to justify our projects to grantmakers and to recommend others’ projects for funding. Increasingly, funding guidelines themselves require collaboration. 3) Unlike much traditional scholarship, which often requires one big deliverable (a book) after years of close-kept study, research, and writing, grant work requires defining and meeting a set of closely timed, concrete deliverables, a mode of work which encourages the kind of agile development so valued by the Internet and digital humanities community."]]></description>
<dc:subject>digital-humanities cultural-norms open-access openness network-culture</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:7fdcea57e1d2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:digital-humanities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:network-culture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tunes.org/overview.html">
    <title>Overview: What is TUNES?</title>
    <dc:date>2010-11-07T11:51:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tunes.org/overview.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["TUNES is a Useful, Not Expedient, System"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>programming utopianism openness collective ah-the-90s</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:206800c47654/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:utopianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collective"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:ah-the-90s"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.languagehat.com/archives/003916.php">
    <title>languagehat.com: COLLECTIVE PROTAGORAS TRANSLATION.</title>
    <dc:date>2010-07-04T11:59:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.languagehat.com/archives/003916.php</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["…I’ve invited readers to comment and offer suggestions to improve the translation. My goal is to communicate Plato in English the way readers of his would have interpreted his Greek, aiming to capture his range of styles (colloquial conversation on the street, philosophical debate, rhetorical displays, poetic analysis, and so on) in a contemporary idiom. The nature of the project requires a wide readership for its success, so I hope you will pass this along."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>crowdsourcing translation openness collaboration classics philosophy academic-publishing disintermediation-in-action</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:2786baca0606/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:crowdsourcing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:translation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:classics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-in-action"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2010/04/28/mobile-platforms/">
    <title>Wikinomics – Open management, traditional thinking</title>
    <dc:date>2010-04-29T11:35:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/index.php/2010/04/28/mobile-platforms/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Just as the auto-industry is fragmenting as it becomes clear the majors can’t satisfy niche demand propelled by personalization, the mobile phone industry knows that the success of Apple’s iPhone is a sign that customization and personalization are now more important than engineering excellence. No manager, executive or designer is unaware of it – though we’ve seen a succession of ultra-high functionality phones launched recently, with a phone-based Sony playstation device to come."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>business-model engineering-design business-model-failure openness mass-customization</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:4160b7e3151a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-model"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:engineering-design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-model-failure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:mass-customization"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.boingboing.net/2010/03/08/lawrence-lessig-scar-1.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+boingboing%2FiBag+(Boing+Boing)">
    <title>Lawrence Lessig scares a room of liberals - Boing Boing</title>
    <dc:date>2010-03-09T14:32:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.boingboing.net/2010/03/08/lawrence-lessig-scar-1.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+boingboing%2FiBag+(Boing+Boing)</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["There's plenty to argue about here and he presents in black and white some issues that are full of grays, but chances are you won't spend 20 minutes today with a smarter person. It's worth watching and thinking about …"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>openness open-access copyright intellectual-property politics conservatism rights lessig</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:00041ee9dd33/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conservatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rights"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:lessig"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://seekingalpha.com/article/190633-open-letter-to-yahoo-on-its-open-strategy-to-make-the-web-more-open-and-relevant?source=feed">
    <title>Open Letter to Yahoo on Its 'Open Strategy to Make the Web More Open and Relevant' -- Seeking Alpha</title>
    <dc:date>2010-02-25T16:21:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/190633-open-letter-to-yahoo-on-its-open-strategy-to-make-the-web-more-open-and-relevant?source=feed</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Personally, I’d love to see some of these problems above fixed and I’d love to be able to really nod my head in agreement when I read that Yahoo is serious about a more “open and relevant web.” That would be much better than me shaking my head in disagreement and writing letters."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>Yahoo! openness public-relations PR web-culture corporatism disintermediation-in-action</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:59589a6637e3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Yahoo!"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-relations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:PR"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:web-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:corporatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-in-action"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://scienceblogs.com/effectmeasure/2010/02/the_copyright_mafia_makes_me_s.php">
    <title>The copyright mafia makes me scream (again) : Effect Measure</title>
    <dc:date>2010-02-25T13:32:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://scienceblogs.com/effectmeasure/2010/02/the_copyright_mafia_makes_me_s.php</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I don't know about you, but for most of us "the best solution available in the market" is the one that costs the least and does what I want it to. If it's free, even better. Can we say "Google"?"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>intellectual-property copyright openness open-access culture-war corporatism transparency transparency-it-ain't</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:5003ba4f5900/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:culture-war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:corporatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:transparency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:transparency-it-ain't"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-02/uoia-dos022410.php">
    <title>Deluge of scientific data needs to be curated for long-term use</title>
    <dc:date>2010-02-25T12:51:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-02/uoia-dos022410.php</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Most organizations have serious problems with data management because it's expensive to do systematic curation, which includes documenting the context in which data were generated or derived, including the instruments involved, the protocols and such," Palmer said. "But that also requires caring for the data and making them available to other scientists. It takes serious commitment and investment."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>curation data data-warehousing openness open-science challenges</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:b1fa898c7b8c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:curation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:data-warehousing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:challenges"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://zenhabits.net/2010/02/completion-principles/">
    <title>4 Simple Principles of Getting to Completion | Zen Habits</title>
    <dc:date>2010-02-19T14:15:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://zenhabits.net/2010/02/completion-principles/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["1. Keep the scope as simple as possible.… 2. Practice ‘Good Enough’.… 3. Kill extra features.… 4. Make it public, quick."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>project-management planning advice software-development openness productivity simplicity</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:ae950143351d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:project-management"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:planning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:advice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:software-development"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:productivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:simplicity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=45&amp;aid=176417">
    <title>Poynter Online - Romenesko</title>
    <dc:date>2010-01-25T21:03:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=45&amp;aid=176417</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Under the new plan, EWA will immediately shift from a traditional membership organization to an open community, embracing a wider net of people concerned about the quality of education information. The organization will create 21st century mechanisms for supporting traditional writers in real time while adopting creative advocacy on behalf of first-rate sustainable journalism."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>education writing journalism business-model openness collaboration nonprofit trade-association</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:9225d68d9ac9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-model"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:nonprofit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:trade-association"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.gcbl.org/blog/marc-lefkowitz/city-planning-throws-weight-behind-open-access-innerbelt-bridge">
    <title>City Planning throws weight behind open access for Innerbelt Bridge | GreenCityBlueLake</title>
    <dc:date>2010-01-23T20:51:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.gcbl.org/blog/marc-lefkowitz/city-planning-throws-weight-behind-open-access-innerbelt-bridge</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The Commission’s resolution also included a call for ODOT to attend their next meeting on February 2 (9 am at City Hall) to discuss the benefits of a bike/ped path included in the bid process. ODOT will release the RFQ that same day, so Brown pointed out that the resolution and alternative technical specification in the RFQ will have to be sent to ODOT this week. ODOT will host a meeting for parties interested in designing the Innerbelt Bridge on Feb. 9. Kuri asked if this was a public meeting (and offered after that a group of advocates might consider forming as a design ‘firm’ to bid on the project – for at least the purpose of attending the Feb. 9 meeting. The guidlines for bidding on the Innerbelt Bridge can be found here.)"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>city-planning collaboration openness government2.0 public-policy engineering-design funding project-management</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:2678fe1d0f87/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:city-planning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:government2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:engineering-design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:funding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:project-management"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://mashable.com/2010/01/22/open-source-san-francisco/">
    <title>Why Open Source is the New Software Policy in San Francisco</title>
    <dc:date>2010-01-23T13:23:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://mashable.com/2010/01/22/open-source-san-francisco/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Since the launch of DataSF last summer, the City’s clearinghouse of government datasets, we have seen our tech community create new services and products never dreamed of within the walls of government. And now we are giving people access to technology systems like our 311 call center through open source, so they can decide how and when they interact with government.

We face many challenges today, none more urgent than the economic crisis, but with it comes an opportunity to seek new ways of governing. In San Francisco, like other cities, we are using this opportunity to engage our greatest resource, the public, to build a government that works better for all of us."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>openness transparency government2.0 government data-access innovation economics city-planning</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:6211b0a6bb6c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:transparency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:government2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:data-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:city-planning"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6709919.html">
    <title>With a Little Help: Can You Hear Me Now? - 12/7/2009 - Publishers Weekly</title>
    <dc:date>2009-12-15T13:05:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6709919.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I can understand why a retailer would want to use my copyright as bait to lock in readers—but exactly how is this good for me? This is why I'm not selling digital downloads of the professional readings of With a Little Help. With so much friction and goofiness in the marketplace, I'd rather give the MP3s away under a Creative Commons license and solicit donations through PayPal. My listeners don't want DRM. They want to get their books with a minimum of hassle. But, for the record, I'd put my books in Audible and the iTunes Store in a hot second if only they'd sell them on the same terms that I'd be willing to buy them: no DRM and no license agreement except “don't violate copyright law.”"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>copyright intellectual-property lawyers Apple DRM openness open-access culture-clash business-model-failure disintermediation-targets</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:65be8f8d3765/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:lawyers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:DRM"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:culture-clash"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-model-failure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-targets"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2670/2366">
    <title>Open Design Projects</title>
    <dc:date>2009-11-17T12:05:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2670/2366</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Extensive research has been done to analyze the phenomenon of open source software development from various perspectives. By contrast little is known about open source development of tangible objects, so–called open design, so far. Until recently, limitations to the availability of successful empirical examples of this ‘new innovation model’ outside software may have been a key reason for this gap.

This paper contributes to the literature on the open source mode of product development by providing a quantitative study (N = 85) of open design projects. Our goal is to explore the landscape of open source development in the world of atoms, to analyze project characteristics, structures, and success, and to investigate similarities and dissimilarities to open source software development."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-source openness open-design engineering collaboration industrial-design intellectual-property community overview</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:fefb1d0dc662/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-source"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:engineering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:industrial-design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:overview"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://scienceblogs.com/commonknowledge/2009/10/open_source_science_or_distrib.php">
    <title>Open Source Science? Or Distributed Science? : Common Knowledge</title>
    <dc:date>2009-11-08T19:03:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://scienceblogs.com/commonknowledge/2009/10/open_source_science_or_distrib.php</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Open source, if we view it through a different lens, is really more about a distributed methodology for software development. The burden of creation is widely distributed across a massive community with more-or-less equal access to tools and systems. In this context, the role of the legal tool is more akin to an enzyme. It was an essential piece of a puzzle, but it was not the only piece. In fact, without the rest of the infrastructure (connectivity, tools, and people) the legal tool on its own would not have led us to GNU/Linux."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>openness distributed crowdsourcing science science2.0 community collaboration infrastructure academia academic-culture</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:f75c3b143770/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:distributed"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:crowdsourcing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:infrastructure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/the-logic-of-collective-action/">
    <title>Michael Nielsen » The Logic of Collective Action</title>
    <dc:date>2009-11-06T12:03:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/the-logic-of-collective-action/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["What Olson shows in the book is that although all parties in a group may strongly desire and benefit from a particular collective good (e.g., a stable climate), under many circumstances they will not take individual action to achieve that collective good. In particular, they often find it in their individual best interest to act against their collective interest. The book has a penetrating analysis of what conditions can cause individual and collective interests to be aligned, and what causes them to be out of alignement."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:jyew collaboration openness economics collective-action social-norms social-psychology classics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:3ad6853c4317/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:jyew"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collective-action"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:classics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/10/30/oregon-once-again-cl.html">
    <title>Oregon once again claims that law is copyrighted - Boing Boing</title>
    <dc:date>2009-11-05T15:23:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.boingboing.net/2009/10/30/oregon-once-again-cl.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Well, those copyright assertions are back, this time by the Attorney General, who asserted ownership over the (for real!) Attorney General's Public Record and Public Meeting Manual. I spent last week in Oregon meeting with law school faculty and giving lectures at 3 universities on the topic of who owns the law."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>copyright intellectual-property activism law culture-war public-policy public-domain openness</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:d23a9ac96022/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:activism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:culture-war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-domain"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jchrisa.net/drl/_design/sofa/_show/post/What-CouchDB-brings-to-HTML5">
    <title>What CouchDB brings to HTML5 : Daytime Running Lights</title>
    <dc:date>2009-10-30T21:45:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://jchrisa.net/drl/_design/sofa/_show/post/What-CouchDB-brings-to-HTML5</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In a CouchDB-enabled web, data-flows don't have to be centralized, which means friends can communicate without going through a fixed domain. This makes the web more efficient. It also means I can make data available to my social network without relying on 3rd-party services."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>CouchDB HTML5 standard-setting-play distributed-processing openness open-access grid-computing social-networks</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:95738d82025c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:CouchDB"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:HTML5"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:standard-setting-play"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:distributed-processing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:grid-computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-networks"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.dfa.org/about/approach.html">
    <title>Diagnostics For All: About - DFA's Approach</title>
    <dc:date>2009-10-24T15:53:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.dfa.org/about/approach.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["DFA is an innovative 501(c)(3) organization with a unique business model combining elements of a non-profit organization with those of a biotech company."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>diagnostics medical-technology openness open-access fabrication innovation nonprofit L3C</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:75a287235c4b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:diagnostics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:medical-technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:fabrication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:nonprofit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:L3C"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://opencloudconsortium.org/about.html">
    <title>About the Open Cloud Consortium</title>
    <dc:date>2009-10-21T11:19:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://opencloudconsortium.org/about.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The Open Cloud Consortium (OCC) is a member driven organization that:

Supports the development of standards for cloud computing and frameworks for interoperating between clouds;
develops benchmarks for cloud computing;
supports reference implementations for cloud computing, preferably open source reference implementations;
manages a testbed for cloud computing called the Open Cloud Testbed;
sponsors workshops and other events related to cloud computing."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>cloud-computing nudge standards openness open-science grid-computing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:e541b76cb424/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cloud-computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:nudge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:grid-computing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.core77.com/blog/news/2009_open_architecture_challenge_awards_14572.asp">
    <title>2009 Open Architecture Challenge Awards - Core77</title>
    <dc:date>2009-09-16T23:29:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.core77.com/blog/news/2009_open_architecture_challenge_awards_14572.asp</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Section Eight Design was selected as the winner for their partnership with Teton Valley Community School, a non-profit, independent school in Victor, Idaho. The proposal, pictured above, focuses on scalability and a connection to the outdoors, taking advantage of the school's location at the base of the Teton Mountain Range. In addition to classrooms and meeting spaces that the school will build incrementally as they raise funds, gardens, farm animals, and local, drought-resistant flora will be integrated into the school's fabric to promote community, environmental responsibility and a "sense of place.""
]]></description>
<dc:subject>architecture design openness competition award-winning sustainability</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:d82eecaf9f56/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:architecture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:competition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:award-winning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sustainability"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://open.umich.edu/community/umich.php">
    <title>Open.Michigan: U-M Community</title>
    <dc:date>2009-09-05T12:17:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://open.umich.edu/community/umich.php</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The following groups strengthen Open.Michigan through related efforts, resources, input, and ongoing discussion around the initiative."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>openness open-access local University-of-Michigan creative-commons courseware free-as-in-useful</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:5e0e44d7f09b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:local"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:University-of-Michigan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:creative-commons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:courseware"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:free-as-in-useful"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://seekingalpha.com/article/159660-newspapers-and-the-meaning-of-membership?source=feed">
    <title>Newspapers and the Meaning of Membership -- Seeking Alpha</title>
    <dc:date>2009-09-03T12:04:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/159660-newspapers-and-the-meaning-of-membership?source=feed</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["How far would and should news organizations be willing to go with this extended vision of membership? I can see newspapers as they have existed being quite uncomfortable with the idea of handing over control and even membership to the community. I can hear their fears of being co-opted or gamed. But that comes from still thinking of news as the property of a single company. Those days are soon over."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>news media business-culture business-model disintermediation openness</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:887dd01c35a0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:news"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-model"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://abouttag.blogspot.com/2009/09/permissions-worth-getting-excited-about.html">
    <title>About Tag: Permissions Worth Getting Excited About</title>
    <dc:date>2009-09-03T00:13:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://abouttag.blogspot.com/2009/09/permissions-worth-getting-excited-about.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["At the moment, any of us who use web applications tend to spend a lot of time and effort populating application databases to make them useful to us. But when we do so, we tend to lose control of our data. They go into a private database schema, and what access we have to that depends entirely on what the application allows us to do. Sometimes there are reasonable ways to get the data back out (some kind of an XML dump perhaps), sometimes not. But always the application is in control. And linking data across applications is, in general, somewhere between hard and impossible.

FluidDB can change all that by leaving the user in control of his or her data, granting the application only such permissions as necessary or desired, and ensuring that the user retains flexability and control."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>FluidDB Terry-Jones database design software-development innovation openness collaboration learning-from-data learning-by-doing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:b31f5712efa6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:FluidDB"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Terry-Jones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:database"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:software-development"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:learning-from-data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:learning-by-doing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/node/5505">
    <title>&quot;Should Copyright Of Academic Works Be Abolished?&quot; | Berkman Center</title>
    <dc:date>2009-07-28T13:55:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/node/5505</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The conventional rationale for copyright of written works, that copyright is needed to foster their creation, is seemingly of limited applicability to the academic domain. For in a world without copyright of academic writing, academics would still benefit from publishing in the major way that they do now, namely, from gaining scholarly esteem. Yet publishers would presumably have to impose fees on authors, because publishers would not be able to profit from reader charges. If these publication fees would be borne by academics, their incentives to publish would be reduced. But if the publication fees would usually be paid by universities or grantors, the motive of academics to publish would be unlikely to decrease (and could actually increase) – suggesting that ending academic copyright would be socially desirable in view of the broad benefits of a copyright-free world. "
]]></description>
<dc:subject>copyright academic-culture publishing disintermediation openness open-access education pedagogy reputation publishers</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:f95370269b79/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:reputation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishers"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://infochimps.org/">
    <title>Infochimps.org: Free Redistributable Data Sets of Every Kind</title>
    <dc:date>2009-04-12T20:02:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://infochimps.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["There are many sources to find out something about everything. Until now, there’s been no good place for you to find out everything about something.
The infochimps.org community is assembling and interconnecting the world's best repository for raw data -- a sort of giant free allmanac, with tables on everything you can put in a table. Built by data nerds, used by data nerds, it's a central source for the information you need to power the projects the world needs. (learn more: help|faq)"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>data data-analysis openness open-science public-domain information visualization archive database free raw-data-now</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:1744bbb5fa75/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:data-analysis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-domain"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:information"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:visualization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:archive"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:database"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:free"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:raw-data-now"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2009/03/open-source-har.html">
    <title>Open Source Hardware Hackers Start P2P Bank | Gadget Lab from Wired.com</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-20T11:02:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2009/03/open-source-har.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Lenders are offered returns based on a rolling six-month average so dud projects will be offset by sales of profitable ones. It takes just a few deals to strike it big, Huynh and Stack say, and because it is a community that is not just passionate but also knowledgeable, better projects are likely to get funded.

The promise of returns is enough to get former investment banker Andrew de Montille excited.

"I put money in the bank not because I consider it as a charitable investment," says de Montille. "Rather, I am very confident that some of the projects will do well enough to be profitable to the investors.""
]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:srose collaboration open-source hardware engineering engineering-design openness intellectual-property business-model investment innovation</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:9c41a691c96b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:srose"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-source"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:hardware"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:engineering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:engineering-design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-model"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:investment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:innovation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://enthusiasm.cozy.org/archives/2009/03/what-a-mess">
    <title>Ascription is an Anathema to any Enthusiasm › What a mess!</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-18T11:06:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://enthusiasm.cozy.org/archives/2009/03/what-a-mess</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Standards create opportunities to do stuff.  These opportunities may well be patent worthy.  So if you want to grow out the thicket around the emerging standard you just lock some smart guys in a room and start them brain storming.  Some of what they come up with will be obvious, but that hardly means you won’t be able to capture a patent for it.   Just to add to fire to the shit storm it appears that Redhat’s patent is for the mind bogglingly obvious idea of transfering XML data over AMQP.  Of course any patent worth it’s lawyering starts with some broad claim and then get’s more focused."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>intellectual-property patents openness competition cooperation standard-setting-play</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:b55bcd567fd2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:competition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cooperation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:standard-setting-play"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arborwiki.org/city/Susan_Pollay">
    <title>ArborWiki | Susan Pollay</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-18T00:08:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arborwiki.org/city/Susan_Pollay</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>a2DDAmage DDA local Ann-Arbor politics openness our-tiny-time-of-troubles</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:32fe3fba32f5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:a2DDAmage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:DDA"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:local"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Ann-Arbor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:our-tiny-time-of-troubles"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.collabforge.net/drupal/">
    <title>collabforge | collaboration :: cooperation :: coordination</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-15T14:33:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.collabforge.net/drupal/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Collabforge is developing the online collaboration strategy for what will be a Web portal that helps Australians to find, navigate, understand and act on federal, state and local government environmental efficiency programs. The site will provide information for households, schools and small businesses, and is investigating options to best engage the public including via social media and web 2.0 opportunities."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:srose collaboration transparency government business-models openness participation cultural-norms disintermediation</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:6a22416803f8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:srose"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:transparency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-models"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:participation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://a2geeks.org/display/geek/Data">
    <title>Data - a2geeks - Confluence</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-15T14:31:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://a2geeks.org/display/geek/Data</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["This page (and sub-pages) contains a list of data related to Ann Arbor. Feel free to add pages describing additional datasets. Copy an existing data page to get the correct format, so the data will appear in the summary table below."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>mashup Ann-Arbor local data openness a2DDAmage transparency</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:970edb19b0d7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:mashup"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Ann-Arbor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:local"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:a2DDAmage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:transparency"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://a2-park.appspot.com/#_home">
    <title>A2-Park</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-14T19:25:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://a2-park.appspot.com/#_home</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>trek local Ann-Arbor parking a2DDAmage DDA watershed openness open-access</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:ba402aef066d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:trek"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:local"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Ann-Arbor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:parking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:a2DDAmage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:DDA"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:watershed"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://trek.tumblr.com/post/86449862/dda-info-policy">
    <title>thoughtbox</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-14T19:13:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://trek.tumblr.com/post/86449862/dda-info-policy</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I would greatly appreciate a list detailing these security risks, the process by which they were identified, and the names and titles of the people at the DDA (or people who the DDA contacted) who have the necessary technical expertise to both determine and enact this identification process. A reply by email is sufficient, although I am willing to submit a formal FOIA request by mail for this information."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>trek local openness transparency Downtown-Development-Authority Ann-Arbor a2DDAmage disintermediation watershed</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:ca9265221fb0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:trek"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:local"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:transparency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Downtown-Development-Authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Ann-Arbor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:a2DDAmage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:watershed"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.voiptechchat.com/voip/255/a2dda-blocks-asterisk-parking-data/">
    <title>A2DDA Blocks Asterisk Parking Data | VoIP Tech Chat</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-13T18:17:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.voiptechchat.com/voip/255/a2dda-blocks-asterisk-parking-data/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[“Hi all.   Over the last day or so I have talked about your project with a few DDA members and what arose from these conversations was a shared concern that because the project was not an initiative created by/run by the DDA there are no controls in place for this at present.  For instance, there is no DDA policy about how to allow /or even if it should allow an outside group to use the DDA’s parking data for a private enterprise.  There is a concern about how unsecure/secure the DDA website is made when sharing this data.   And finally, a concern that if the project had value to parking patrons, that the DDA itself should consider providing this service as an extension of what it is already doing on-line.”
]]></description>
<dc:subject>community activism data-access openness government government2.0 local Ann-Arbor disintermediation watershed</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:36ae747083f2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:activism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:data-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:government2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:local"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Ann-Arbor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:watershed"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://earningmyturns.blogspot.com/2009/02/scaling-up-intellectual-authority.html">
    <title>Earning My Turns: Scaling up intellectual authority</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-10T06:45:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://earningmyturns.blogspot.com/2009/02/scaling-up-intellectual-authority.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["What Dave Winer says here about the news applies as well to scientific publishing. The arguments about open access and about review quality are but a sideline to a much more fundamental one: how to create sustainable mechanisms that will increasingly open up the process of writing up new ideas, reviewing them, and publicly building a consensus for or against their scientific soundness and importance."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>openness open-access publishing academia academic-culture credentials</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a703b7092c73/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:credentials"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://openeverything.wik.is/">
    <title>Open Everything - Open Everything</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-06T20:45:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://openeverything.wik.is/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Open Everything is a global conversation about the art, science and spirit of 'open'. It gathers people using openness to create and improve software, education, media, philanthropy, architecture, neighbourhoods, workplaces and the society we live in: everything. It's about thinking, doing and being open."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>openness open-source open-access intellectual-property meeting collaboration community commons conference cooperation events</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:da7cf95cf175/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-source"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:meeting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:commons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conference"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cooperation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:events"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/massimo-menichinelli-open-p2p-design-as-enabling-open-p2p-systems/2008/11/24">
    <title>P2P Foundation » Blog Archive » Massimo Menichinelli: Open P2P Design as enabling Open P2P Systems</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-06T20:26:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/massimo-menichinelli-open-p2p-design-as-enabling-open-p2p-systems/2008/11/24</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Nowadays there is a common agreement about how our society needs to be able to change and adapt to the fast changes that happens in the economical, social and environmental dimensions. We are interested not in single and few changes, but in the ability to continuously introduce new ideas in our products, processes and organizations in order to maintain our conditions or improve them. We are interested in the ability to innovate our activities in what they do and how they do it."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>peer-production openness open-access design development crowdsourcing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:51716a37e706/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:peer-production"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:development"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:crowdsourcing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.librarything.com/thingology/2009/02/evil-326.php">
    <title>Thingology (LibraryThing's ideas blog): The evil 3.26%</title>
    <dc:date>2009-02-02T12:39:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.librarything.com/thingology/2009/02/evil-326.php</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["It's time for OCLC to recognize they made this mess, not others. They have perpetrated some astouding missteps—from attempting to sneak through a major rewrite of the core member policy in a few days without consultation, to a comic series of rewrites and policy reversals, culminating in withdrawing the policy entirely for discussion. (It now seems clear they did so on the heels of a member revolt, whether general or just of some key libraries.)"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>OCLC openness open-access bad-decision monopoly disintermediation-target nonprofit-my-ass intellectual-property exclusivity-is-an-asset</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:0f7c1fa4fc28/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:OCLC"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:bad-decision"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:monopoly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-target"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:nonprofit-my-ass"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:exclusivity-is-an-asset"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>