<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (Vaguery)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from Vaguery</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://psyarxiv.com/ft8dc/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.ogrants.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2209188&amp;gt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://medium.com/@junanaguy/things-about-science-that-you-may-have-not-considered-yet-131c5ff824d0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ronininstitute.org/performance-and-collaboration-creating-new-scientific-ecosystems/1835/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://github.com/donnemartin/data-science-ipython-notebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1309.1812"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://carlboettiger.info/2012/09/28/Welcome-to-my-lab-notebook.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ivory.idyll.org/blog/blog-practicing-open-science.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://futureofscipub.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/open-post-publication-peer-review/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.growthology.org/growthology/2012/04/civic-startup-accelerator.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://github.com/huntergdavis/Quick-Grapher"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.r-bloggers.com/review-of-2011-data-scientist-summit/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+RBloggers+%28R+bloggers%29"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.walkingrandomly.com/?p=3396"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fastcompany.com/1709448/interview-with-a-bee-leaker-beekeeper-tom-theobald-discusses-the-epas-bee-toxic-pesticide-co"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pawelszczesny.org/2010/08/02/open-data-citation-advantage/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://code.google.com/apis/predict/docs/getting-started.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.r-bloggers.com/an-article-attacking-r-gets-responses-from-the-r-blogosphere-%E2%80%93-some-reflections/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-02/uoia-dos022410.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2010/01/keeping-computers-from-ending-sciences-reproducibility.ars"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.0454"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://opencloudconsortium.org/about.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cs.gmu.edu/~sean/book/metaheuristics/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://infochimps.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mygrid.org.uk/tools/taverna/what-is-a-workflow/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200811/backpage.cfm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/1266869.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2008/08/21/out_in_the_open_some_scientists_sharing_results/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://timemachine.iic.harvard.edu/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.openwetware.org/scienceintheopen/2008/06/12/data-is-free-or-hidden-there-is-no-middle-ground/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.syrexe.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.openwetware.org/scienceintheopen/2007/12/12/a-big-few-weeks-for-open-notebook-science/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.openwetware.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2008/01/new-year-resolutions.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://totallyretrosynthetic.blogspot.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://usefulchem.blogspot.com/2007/05/totally-retrosynthetic.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sennoma.net/main/archives/2007/05/open_science_news.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sennoma.net/main/archives/2007/05/another_new_open_science_blog.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sennoma.net/main/archives/2007/05/damn_good_idea.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.plos.org/cms/node/238"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://usefulchem.wikispaces.com/Alicia+Holsey"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://synthesis.williamgunn.org/2007/06/26/open-science/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://precedings.nature.com/documents/39/version/1#comments"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://psyarxiv.com/ft8dc/">
    <title>PsyArXiv Preprints | Is Open Science Neoliberal?</title>
    <dc:date>2021-12-17T12:09:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://psyarxiv.com/ft8dc/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The scientific reform movement, which is frequently referred to as open science, has the potential to substantially reshape how science is done, and for this reason, its socio-political antecedents and consequences deserve serious scholarly attention. In a recently formed literature that professes to meet this need, it has been widely argued that the movement is neoliberal. However, for two reasons it is hard to justify this wide-scale attribution: 1) the critics mistakenly attribute the movement a monolithic structure, and 2) the critics' arguments associating the movement with neoliberalism are highly questionable. In particular, critics too hastily associate the movement’s preferential focus on methodological issues and its underlying philosophy of science with neoliberalism, and their allegations regarding the pro-market proclivities of the reform movement do not hold under closer scrutiny. What is needed are more nuanced accounts of the socio-political underpinnings of scientific reform that show more respect to the complexity of the subject matter. To address this need, we propose a meta-model for the analysis of reform proposals, which represents methodology, axiology, science policy, and ideology as interconnected but relatively distinct domains, and allows for recognizing the divergent tendencies in the movement.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>no Betteridge's-law neoliberalism open-science open-access academic-culture academia-doesn't-guarantee-acuity</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:e79b4d7e5e50/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:no"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Betteridge's-law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:neoliberalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia-doesn't-guarantee-acuity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.ogrants.org/">
    <title>Home · Open Grants</title>
    <dc:date>2020-04-27T21:52:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.ogrants.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[An increasing number of researchers are sharing their grant proposals openly. They do this to open up science so that all stages of the process can benefit from better interaction and communication and to provide examples for early career scientists writing grants. This is a list of 206 of these proposals to help you find them.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>grants open-access academic-culture rather-interesting transparency open-science to-write-about not-visibly-thriving-tho</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:eacb13597230/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:grants"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:transparency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:not-visibly-thriving-tho"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2209188&amp;gt">
    <title>The Historical Origins of 'Open Science': An Essay on Patronage, Reputation and Common Agency Contracting in the Scientific Revolution by Paul A. David :: SSRN</title>
    <dc:date>2020-01-19T13:53:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2209188&amp;gt</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This essay examines the economics of patronage in the production of knowledge and its influence upon the historical formation of key elements in the ethos and organizational structure of publicly funded 'open science.' The emergence during the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries of the idea and practice of 'open science' was a distinctive and vital organizational aspect of the Scientific Revolution. It represented a break from the previously dominant ethos of secrecy in the pursuit of Nature's Secrets, to a new set of norms, incentives, and organizational structures that reinforced scientific researchers' commitments to rapid disclosure of new knowledge. The rise of 'cooperative rivalries' in the revelation of new knowledge, is seen as a functional response to heightened asymmetric information problems posed for the Renaissance system of court-patronage of the arts and sciences; pre-existing informational asymmetries had been exacerbated by the claims of mathematicians and the increasing practical reliance upon new mathematical techniques in a variety of 'contexts of application.' Reputational competition among Europe's noble patrons motivated much of their efforts to attract to their courts the most prestigious natural philosophers, was no less crucial in the workings of that system than was the concern among their would-be clients to raise their peer-based reputational status. In late Renaissance Europe, the feudal legacy of fragmented political authority had resulted in relations between noble patrons and their savantclients that resembled the situation modern economists describe as `common agency contracting in substitutes' - competition among incompletely informed principals for the dedicated services of multiple agents. These conditions tended to result in contract terms (especially with regard to autonomy and financial support) that left agent client members of the nascent scientific communities better positioned to retain larger information rents on their specialized knowledge. This encouraged entry into their emerging disciplines, and enabled them collectively to develop a stronger degree of professional autonomy for their programs of inquiry within the increasingly specialized and formal scientific academies (such the Académie royale des Sciences and the Royal Society) that had attracted the patronage of rival absolutist States of Western Europe during the latter part of the seventeenth century. The institutionalization of 'open science' that took place within those settings is shown to have continuities with the use by scientists of the earlier humanist academies, and with the logic of regal patronage, rather than being driven by the material requirements of new observational and experimental techniques.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-access open-science history prestige academic-culture hierarchy pecking-order reputation to-read sociology social-capital history-of-science</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:2dc51d785ed9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:prestige"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:hierarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pecking-order"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:reputation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-read"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sociology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-capital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:history-of-science"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://medium.com/@junanaguy/things-about-science-that-you-may-have-not-considered-yet-131c5ff824d0">
    <title>Things about science (that you may have not considered yet).</title>
    <dc:date>2019-05-02T09:16:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://medium.com/@junanaguy/things-about-science-that-you-may-have-not-considered-yet-131c5ff824d0</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[THIS IS a draft of an introductory essay for the Open Scientist Handbook… I would love to know if it’s going in an interesting direction.
There are books and libraries of books that talk about science: its history, sociology, philosophy, politics, and practice. As a scientist, you’ve likely gotten this far in life without reading any of these. You probably don’t need to start now. In this essay, a few remarks about science will help anchor the (still being written) Open Scientist Handbook into a particular framework for science as a project, as an endeavor, and a lifeway.
You are already a scientist, so you don’t need a general introduction to “science.” Also, you can learn everything you need about open science as a practice by checking out the Open Science MOOC.
WHEN THE HANDBOOK is done, this essay will have live-links into several other essays/sections in the book that you can explore if you wish, when it’s convenient. (NOTE: This handbook follows the “mullet” logic: all the great stuff up front, and the ragged details in the back.) Here you will find several Richard Feynman quotes. Do you want a good example of an open scientist? Be like Richard Feynman (who died before open science became a meme):
Feynman quote (still looking for the source): 
“Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that’s not why we do it.”
]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-science public-policy drafts rather-interesting to-write-about</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:0456ac82adbd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:drafts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ronininstitute.org/performance-and-collaboration-creating-new-scientific-ecosystems/1835/">
    <title>Performance and collaboration: creating new scientific ecosystems at CESTEMER | Ronin Institute</title>
    <dc:date>2018-03-05T14:57:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://ronininstitute.org/performance-and-collaboration-creating-new-scientific-ecosystems/1835/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The intense competition to demonstrate individual “ownership” of an idea often prevails in the academic world (coupled with an artificial scarcity that is perpetuated by the journal prestige system amongst other things) can sometimes lead to an atmosphere of distrust. Therefore the direct experience of the value of empathetic collaboration to produce both better results, as well as unexpected and serendipitous discoveries, through such workshops, will become increasingly invaluable as a means for cultural change in our institutions. This bottom-up approach, coupled with more top-down changes in publications and funding incentives, will, I believe, lead to more durable cultural change than either alone. Plus it’s also a much more fun way of doing science!

]]></description>
<dc:subject>science open-science collaboration conferences to-do next-time</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:3fea8dd6c23b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conferences"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-do"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:next-time"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://github.com/donnemartin/data-science-ipython-notebooks">
    <title>donnemartin/data-science-ipython-notebooks</title>
    <dc:date>2016-01-12T20:29:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://github.com/donnemartin/data-science-ipython-notebooks</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Continually updated data science Python notebooks: Deep learning (TensorFlow, Theano, Caffe), scikit-learn, Kaggle, big data (Spark, Hadoop MapReduce, HDFS), matplotlib, pandas, NumPy, SciPy, Python essentials, AWS, and various command lines. https://bit.ly/data-notes
]]></description>
<dc:subject>via? Jupyter open-science data-analysis deep-learning machine-learning scientific-computing</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:0a1ebb94b7e7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via?"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Jupyter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:data-analysis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:deep-learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:machine-learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:scientific-computing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1309.1812">
    <title>[1309.1812] Cactus: Issues for Sustainable Simulation Software</title>
    <dc:date>2013-09-17T17:05:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1309.1812</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The Cactus Framework is an open-source, modular, portable programming environment for the collaborative development and deployment of scientific applications using high-performance computing. Its roots reach back to 1996 at the National Center for Supercomputer Applications and the Albert Einstein Institute in Germany, where its development jumpstarted. Since then, the Cactus framework has witnessed major changes in hardware infrastructure as well as its own community. This paper describes its endurance through these past changes and, drawing upon lessons from its past, also discusses future
]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-source open-science framework everybody-needs-a-framework standard-setting-play</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:f05365f49cd4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-source"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:framework"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:everybody-needs-a-framework"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:standard-setting-play"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://carlboettiger.info/2012/09/28/Welcome-to-my-lab-notebook.html">
    <title>Welcome to my Lab Notebook - Reloaded</title>
    <dc:date>2013-05-28T21:04:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://carlboettiger.info/2012/09/28/Welcome-to-my-lab-notebook.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Welcome to my lab notebook, version 3.0. My original open lab notebooks began on the wiki platform OpenWetWare, moved to a personally hosted Wordpress platform, and now run on a Jekyll-powered platform (site-config), but the basic idea remains the same. For completeness, earlier entries from both platforms have been migrated here. Quoting from my original introduction to the Wordpress notebook:

]]></description>
<dc:subject>academic-culture openness open-science the-mangle-in-practice</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:bd8040c5d120/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:the-mangle-in-practice"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ivory.idyll.org/blog/blog-practicing-open-science.html">
    <title>Why I don't &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; practice open science</title>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T23:16:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://ivory.idyll.org/blog/blog-practicing-open-science.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Overall, it's been an interesting personal journey from "blind optimism" about openness to a more, ahem, "nuanced" set of thoughts (i.e., I was wrong before :). I'd be interested to hear what other people have to say... drop me a note or make a comment.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>openness open-science folks-I-know coscience the-mangle-in-practice other-people-are-part-of-the-mangle</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a6bacb8255a2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:folks-I-know"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:coscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:the-mangle-in-practice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:other-people-are-part-of-the-mangle"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://futureofscipub.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/open-post-publication-peer-review/">
    <title>The future of scientific publishing: Open post-publication peer review « The future of scientific publishing</title>
    <dc:date>2012-07-25T18:42:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://futureofscipub.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/open-post-publication-peer-review/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Post-publication: Reviews are submitted after publication, because the paper needs to be publicly accessible in order for any scientist to be able to review it. Post-publication reviews can add evaluative information to papers published in the current system (which have already been secretly reviewed before publication). For example, a highly controversial paper appearing in Science may motivate a number of supportive and critical post-publication reviews. The overall evaluation from these public reviews will affect the attention given to the paper by potential readers. The actual text of the reviews may help readers understand and judge the details of the paper."]]></description>
<dc:subject>peer-review open-science collaboration publishing to-do coscience</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:d89e3bd456d0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:peer-review"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-do"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:coscience"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.growthology.org/growthology/2012/04/civic-startup-accelerator.html">
    <title>Growthology: Civic Startup Accelerator</title>
    <dc:date>2012-06-08T15:17:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.growthology.org/growthology/2012/04/civic-startup-accelerator.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["…What exactly are we talking about when we say ‘using data’? Steven Johnson wrote an interesting piece in Wired two years ago using New York City 311 call data. Those city subway/train/bus route apps on your smartphone? Possible thanks to city governments opening up their data. The recently released Kauffman Foundation health care report contains plenty of discussion and ideas for both the public and private sector."]]></description>
<dc:subject>social-entrepreneurship public-policy startups business-development-sortof shadow-economies open-science</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:ca78adb6f8e9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-entrepreneurship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:startups"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-development-sortof"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:shadow-economies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://github.com/huntergdavis/Quick-Grapher">
    <title>huntergdavis/Quick-Grapher - GitHub</title>
    <dc:date>2012-01-24T13:47:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://github.com/huntergdavis/Quick-Grapher</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>open-source open-science html5 library visualization GitHub</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:278582280a2c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-source"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:html5"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:library"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:visualization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:GitHub"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.r-bloggers.com/review-of-2011-data-scientist-summit/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+RBloggers+%28R+bloggers%29">
    <title>Review of 2011 Data Scientist Summit | (R news &amp; tutorials)</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-14T13:16:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.r-bloggers.com/review-of-2011-data-scientist-summit/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+RBloggers+%28R+bloggers%29</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This was the first annual Data Scientist Summit, and I will no doubt be back. With that said, discussion of technical topics had a bit of an introductory flavor to them, which made the discussion of the technology seem dated. For example, “Vanilla” Hadoop was introduced as a tool for processing vast amounts of data. I would expect that most Data Scientists have worked with Hadoop, or at least know what it is. Hadoop is somewhat old news in terms of “cutting-edge technology.” Tools like Pig, Cascalog, HBase, Hive, Cascading, etc. would have been a better discussion topic. I was also disappointed with how little coverage of tools (except for Hadoop, NoSQL, and enterpise databases) there was. It seemed as if R had gone M.I.A. and I was surprised that there was such little discussion of visualization tools like Tableau, Processing, Gephi, D3, Polymaps, etc.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>data-science conference academic-culture cultural-assumptions corporatism open-science</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:fd61538c3c9b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:data-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conference"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:corporatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.walkingrandomly.com/?p=3396">
    <title>Walking Randomly » Natural Scientists: their very big output files – and a tale of diffs</title>
    <dc:date>2011-04-10T13:06:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.walkingrandomly.com/?p=3396</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["A few years back, when a user at the University of Manchester asked for help with the ‘diff – files too big/ out of memory’ problem, I wrote a modern version that I called idiffh (for Ian’s diffh). My ground rules were:<br />
Work on any text files on any operating system with a C compilerHave no limits on, e.g., line lengths or file sizeNever ‘give up’ if the going gets tough (i.e. when the files are very different)"]]></description>
<dc:subject>diff text-mining dataset open-science tools</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:64fe9c360f08/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:diff"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:text-mining"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:dataset"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:tools"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.fastcompany.com/1709448/interview-with-a-bee-leaker-beekeeper-tom-theobald-discusses-the-epas-bee-toxic-pesticide-co">
    <title>Beekeeper Who Leaked EPA Documents: &quot;I Don't Think We Can Survive This Winter&quot; | Fast Company</title>
    <dc:date>2010-12-14T00:00:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.fastcompany.com/1709448/interview-with-a-bee-leaker-beekeeper-tom-theobald-discusses-the-epas-bee-toxic-pesticide-co</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[""They told me that EPA scientists had reviewed the originally lifecycle study and determined it wasn't scientifically sound, and I asked if it had been documented, if there was a hard copy," he says, "The [employee] said yes, and I asked if I could get a copy." And just like that, he had the proof he needed that the EPA had overlooked something that could be killing America's bees."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>astroturf corporatism pesticides ecology science open-science lawsuit</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:35e8cbf7f2b5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:astroturf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:corporatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pesticides"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:ecology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:lawsuit"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.pawelszczesny.org/2010/08/02/open-data-citation-advantage/">
    <title>» Open Data citation advantage Circle of Complexity</title>
    <dc:date>2010-08-10T11:43:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.pawelszczesny.org/2010/08/02/open-data-citation-advantage/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Because sharing data resulted in a citation, I wonder how long will it take for Open Data advocates to start using this “open data citation advantage” as an argument for sharing data?"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>citation-etiquette economics open-access open-science open-data social-engineering academic-culture</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:805412a3b81b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:citation-etiquette"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-engineering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://code.google.com/apis/predict/docs/getting-started.html">
    <title>Getting Started Guide - Google Prediction API - Google Code</title>
    <dc:date>2010-05-25T00:11:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://code.google.com/apis/predict/docs/getting-started.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The Prediction API allows you to get more from your data and makes its patterns more accessible. Specifically, the Prediction API leverages Google's machine learning infrastructure to give you the tools to better analyze your data and reveal patterns that are often difficult to manually discover. The API also enables you to use those patterns to predict new outcomes, which facilitates the development of all types of software, from textual analysis systems to recommendation systems. Because the Prediction API is a RESTful HTTP service, you can easily access it from Google App Engine, Apps Script, and other Internet-connected desktop applications."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>nudge machine-learning models google prediction clustering learning-from-data AI API open-science</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:61b135a23b0c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:nudge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:machine-learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:models"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:prediction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:clustering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:learning-from-data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:AI"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:API"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.r-bloggers.com/an-article-attacking-r-gets-responses-from-the-r-blogosphere-%E2%80%93-some-reflections/">
    <title>An article attacking R gets responses from the R blogosphere – some reflections | (Articles about R)</title>
    <dc:date>2010-04-16T12:01:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.r-bloggers.com/an-article-attacking-r-gets-responses-from-the-r-blogosphere-%E2%80%93-some-reflections/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["But Dr. De Mars post is (very) important for a different reason. Not because her claims are true or false, but because her writing angered people who love and care for R (whether legitimately or not, it doesn’t matter). Anger, being a very powerful emotion, can reveal interesting things. In our case, it just showed that R bloggers are connected to each other."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>R community open-science statistics criticism-is-the-best-medicine</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:e8596227635a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:R"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:statistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:criticism-is-the-best-medicine"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-02/uoia-dos022410.php">
    <title>Deluge of scientific data needs to be curated for long-term use</title>
    <dc:date>2010-02-25T12:51:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-02/uoia-dos022410.php</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Most organizations have serious problems with data management because it's expensive to do systematic curation, which includes documenting the context in which data were generated or derived, including the instruments involved, the protocols and such," Palmer said. "But that also requires caring for the data and making them available to other scientists. It takes serious commitment and investment."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>curation data data-warehousing openness open-science challenges</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:b1fa898c7b8c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:curation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:data-warehousing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:challenges"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2010/01/keeping-computers-from-ending-sciences-reproducibility.ars">
    <title>Keeping computers from ending science's reproducibility</title>
    <dc:date>2010-01-23T20:48:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2010/01/keeping-computers-from-ending-sciences-reproducibility.ars</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The idea is that the researchers that rely on computational techniques as part of their day-to-day activities need an entire "reproducible research system" that will make it easier for them to document the sources of their data and the analyses performed on it. The system they've designed shares features with rapid application development environments, as it graphically represents modular computational tools, which can be ordered to create an analysis pipeline, and the individual settings for each can be tweaked. Once complete, the user can trigger the analysis to run; the system documents all of the relevant settings and software information."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>agility open-science reproducibility academic-culture academics-shouldn't-design-interfaces arguments-against-interns</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:8f26b9e82f2f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:agility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:reproducibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academics-shouldn't-design-interfaces"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:arguments-against-interns"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.0454">
    <title>[0911.0454] The Financial Bubble Experiment: advanced diagnostics and forecasts of bubble terminations</title>
    <dc:date>2009-12-24T16:03:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.0454</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["We continue this protocol until the future date (1 May 2010) at which time we upload our final version of the master document. For this final version, we include the URL of a web site where the .pdf documents of all of our past forecasts can be downloaded and independently checked for consistent MD5 and SHA-2 hashes. For convenience, we will include a summary of all of our forecasts in this final document."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>prediction economics financial-crisis finance science open-science competition public-policy</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:b1d9440d3438/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:prediction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:financial-crisis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:finance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:competition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://opencloudconsortium.org/about.html">
    <title>About the Open Cloud Consortium</title>
    <dc:date>2009-10-21T11:19:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://opencloudconsortium.org/about.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The Open Cloud Consortium (OCC) is a member driven organization that:

Supports the development of standards for cloud computing and frameworks for interoperating between clouds;
develops benchmarks for cloud computing;
supports reference implementations for cloud computing, preferably open source reference implementations;
manages a testbed for cloud computing called the Open Cloud Testbed;
sponsors workshops and other events related to cloud computing."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>cloud-computing nudge standards openness open-science grid-computing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:e541b76cb424/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cloud-computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:nudge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:grid-computing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://cs.gmu.edu/~sean/book/metaheuristics/">
    <title>&quot;Essentials of Metaheuristics&quot;</title>
    <dc:date>2009-08-22T21:34:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://cs.gmu.edu/~sean/book/metaheuristics/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["About the Book: This is an open set of lecture notes on metaheuristics algorithms, intended for undergraduate students, practitioners, programmers, and other non-experts. It was developed as a series of lecture notes for an undergraduate course I taught at GMU. The chapters are designed to be printable separately if necessary. As it's lecture notes, the topics are short and light on examples and theory. It's best when complementing other texts. With time, I might remedy this."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>metaheuristics genetic-programming book open-source open-science creative-commons computer-science search optimization genetic-algorithm stochastic</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:bb4d5310d85b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:metaheuristics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:genetic-programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:book"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-source"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:creative-commons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:computer-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:search"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:optimization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:genetic-algorithm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:stochastic"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://infochimps.org/">
    <title>Infochimps.org: Free Redistributable Data Sets of Every Kind</title>
    <dc:date>2009-04-12T20:02:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://infochimps.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["There are many sources to find out something about everything. Until now, there’s been no good place for you to find out everything about something.
The infochimps.org community is assembling and interconnecting the world's best repository for raw data -- a sort of giant free allmanac, with tables on everything you can put in a table. Built by data nerds, used by data nerds, it's a central source for the information you need to power the projects the world needs. (learn more: help|faq)"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>data data-analysis openness open-science public-domain information visualization archive database free raw-data-now</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:1744bbb5fa75/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:data-analysis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-domain"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:information"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:visualization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:archive"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:database"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:free"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:raw-data-now"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.mygrid.org.uk/tools/taverna/what-is-a-workflow/">
    <title>myGrid » What is a workflow?</title>
    <dc:date>2009-01-07T19:48:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.mygrid.org.uk/tools/taverna/what-is-a-workflow/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In a scientific context what does this mean? The overall project referred to is your analysis. The activities are simple operations within your analysis. All these operations have a certain number of inputs and outputs.  In the case of fetching a DNA sequence, an input may be an identifier of the sequence, whilst the output is a string representing the nucleotide sequence represented by this identifier.
The triggering of activities by other activities are where an operation feeds data into a subsequent operation. For example, the ‘fetch sequence’ operation may feed its output (the string containing sequence ‘ACTG’) into a ‘transcribe’ operation. This would subsequently change the DNA sequence into an RNA sequence. We would then have a simple workflow with one operation, and a link, which looks something like the following:..."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-science science collaboration modeling work communication formalization</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:2eca0e093bb5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:modeling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:formalization"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200811/backpage.cfm">
    <title>The Back Page</title>
    <dc:date>2008-12-07T14:02:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200811/backpage.cfm</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Wikipedia is a second example where scientists have missed an opportunity to innovate online. Wikipedia has a vision statement to warm a scientist’s heart: “Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. That’s our commitment.” You might guess Wikipedia was started by scientists eager to collect all of human knowledge into a single source. In fact, Wikipedia’s founder, Jimmy Wales, had a background in finance and as a web developer. In the early days few established scientists were involved. To contribute would arouse suspicion from colleagues that you were wasting time that could be spent writing papers and grants."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>openness open-science publishing cultural-norms collaboration transparency wikinomics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:97ae332f6f73/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:transparency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:wikinomics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/1266869.html">
    <title>Opinion - My View: What's so wasteful about funding discovery? - sacbee.com</title>
    <dc:date>2008-10-12T13:53:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/1266869.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Not all science needs to have a purpose. The nature of humans is that, sometimes, they simply want to know. Everything else is just a bonus.

Srinivasa Ramanujan and Albert Einstein, the two scientific geniuses of the 20th century, made their earliest discoveries while working as clerks, not as professors working on taxpayer-funded projects; but why risk, in the 21st century, that some diamond might remain forever unearthed for want of a government grant?"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>science politics academia basic-science funding government grants anti-intellectualism open-science cultural-norms</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:197819e10a23/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:basic-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:funding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:grants"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:anti-intellectualism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2008/08/21/out_in_the_open_some_scientists_sharing_results/">
    <title>Out in the open: Some scientists sharing results - The Boston Globe</title>
    <dc:date>2008-08-22T13:56:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2008/08/21/out_in_the_open_some_scientists_sharing_results/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>open-access open-science data cultural-norms academia revolution marketing contagion-of-ideas</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:5a03cfcb8863/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:revolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:marketing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:contagion-of-ideas"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://timemachine.iic.harvard.edu/">
    <title>Time Series Center | Harvard University</title>
    <dc:date>2008-07-13T03:12:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://timemachine.iic.harvard.edu/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>time-series nudge analytics data-analysis database open-science algorithms timeseries</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:61f08b35a074/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:time-series"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:nudge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:analytics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:data-analysis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:database"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:timeseries"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.openwetware.org/scienceintheopen/2008/06/12/data-is-free-or-hidden-there-is-no-middle-ground/">
    <title>Science in the open » Data is free or hidden - there is no middle ground</title>
    <dc:date>2008-06-19T13:46:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.openwetware.org/scienceintheopen/2008/06/12/data-is-free-or-hidden-there-is-no-middle-ground/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>openness open-science social-norms public-domain research cultural-norms publish-or-perish</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:f0863d3234cf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-domain"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publish-or-perish"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.syrexe.com/">
    <title>Scholarly Research Exchange</title>
    <dc:date>2008-02-26T11:31:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.syrexe.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[via Peter Suber
]]></description>
<dc:subject>openness open-access open-science publishing peer-review academia science collaboration community</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:7ecbdd4bb135/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:peer-review"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:community"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.openwetware.org/scienceintheopen/2007/12/12/a-big-few-weeks-for-open-notebook-science/">
    <title>Science in the open » A big few weeks for open (notebook) science</title>
    <dc:date>2008-01-11T12:31:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.openwetware.org/scienceintheopen/2007/12/12/a-big-few-weeks-for-open-notebook-science/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>openness open-science research academia</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a4e5ccc74d64/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.openwetware.org/">
    <title>openwetware</title>
    <dc:date>2008-01-04T12:45:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.openwetware.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>openness open-science blogging collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:737c8ea6f48d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2008/01/new-year-resolutions.html">
    <title>New Year's Resolutions</title>
    <dc:date>2008-01-04T12:43:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2008/01/new-year-resolutions.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>openness open-access open-science publishing social-norms cultural-norms research academia</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:5c68870c2612/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://totallyretrosynthetic.blogspot.com/">
    <title>Totally Retrosynthetic</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-07T23:13:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://totallyretrosynthetic.blogspot.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>openness open-science blogging research chemistry collaboration plagiarism social-norms academia</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:3cb6edede4f0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:chemistry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:plagiarism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://usefulchem.blogspot.com/2007/05/totally-retrosynthetic.html">
    <title>Useful Chemistry: Totally Retrosynthetic</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-07T23:07:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://usefulchem.blogspot.com/2007/05/totally-retrosynthetic.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>open-science experiment collaboration openness plagiarism cultural-norms institutional-design</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:9d51aa6dd566/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:experiment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:plagiarism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:institutional-design"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sennoma.net/main/archives/2007/05/open_science_news.php">
    <title>Open Reading Frame</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-07T22:13:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.sennoma.net/main/archives/2007/05/open_science_news.php</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Discovery is the addiction that drives research -- it's the crackpipe hit, the rush, the thrill, that keeps us going through the down times and the plodding; but one of the best ways to alleviate the boredom and despondency that sets in between fixes is t
]]></description>
<dc:subject>collaboration science open-access open-science academia cultural-norms learning-by-doing blogs community</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:13e9ed7457ee/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:learning-by-doing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:blogs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:community"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sennoma.net/main/archives/2007/05/another_new_open_science_blog.php">
    <title>Open Reading Frame</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-07T21:36:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.sennoma.net/main/archives/2007/05/another_new_open_science_blog.php</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The real killer is ego: what if someone else gets there first?"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-access open-science commentary academia cultural-norms fear-uncertainty-doubt FUD blogging competitiveness</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a064bbb3b7ce/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:commentary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:fear-uncertainty-doubt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:FUD"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:competitiveness"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sennoma.net/main/archives/2007/05/damn_good_idea.php">
    <title>Open Reading Frame</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-07T21:09:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.sennoma.net/main/archives/2007/05/damn_good_idea.php</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Catching up on old posts of new-discoverd blog: Open-access peer reviewers' comments. Good idea.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>openness open-science collaboration peer-review academia publishing authority comments</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:7f6575e1092e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:peer-review"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:comments"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.plos.org/cms/node/238">
    <title>Free but not Open? | Public Library of Science</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-07T14:50:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.plos.org/cms/node/238</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Free ≠ Open
]]></description>
<dc:subject>free-access open-access openness open-science copyright publishing science</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:ddd206901970/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:free-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://usefulchem.wikispaces.com/Alicia+Holsey">
    <title>UsefulChem » Alicia Holsey</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-07T14:42:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://usefulchem.wikispaces.com/Alicia+Holsey</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Wiki-editing a Masters Thesis, live.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>transparency science communication publishing personal-brand openness open-access open-science wiki writing academia</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:7b9b51232b5e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:transparency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:personal-brand"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:wiki"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://synthesis.williamgunn.org/2007/06/26/open-science/">
    <title>Synthesis - That’s what I do, I synthesize. » Open Science</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-07T14:41:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://synthesis.williamgunn.org/2007/06/26/open-science/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Another live thesis editing experiment.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>science openness open-access transparency blogging writing academia cultural-norms communication open-science</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:ecb1708b6df9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:transparency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://precedings.nature.com/documents/39/version/1#comments">
    <title>Open Notebook Science Using Blogs and Wikis : Nature Precedings</title>
    <dc:date>2007-06-25T13:01:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://precedings.nature.com/documents/39/version/1#comments</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>openness open-science blogging wiki scholarship academia research collaboration community crowdsourcing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a5efeaa6c4ba/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:wiki"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:scholarship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:crowdsourcing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>