<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (Vaguery)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from Vaguery</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://katinamagazine.org/content/article/open-knowledge/2025/how-fanfiction-can-help-reimagine-scholarly-publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://networkcultures.org/makingpublic/2019/05/20/federated-publishing/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://psyarxiv.com/ft8dc/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://openintro-ims.netlify.app/index.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://libretexts.org/mission.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2020/02/03/a-broken-system-why-literature-searching-needs-a-fair-revolution/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/the-value-of-openness-in-scientific-problem-solving"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://direct.mit.edu/books/book/4662/The-End-of-OwnershipPersonal-Property-in-the"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2020/1/241717-publish-and-perish/fulltext"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.ogrants.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/7/4/65"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2209188&amp;gt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://dimenovels.lib.niu.edu/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.molbiolcell.org/doi/10.1091/mbc.E19-03-0147"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://blueoakcouncil.org/examples"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://communemag.com/the-end-of-the-line/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://peerj.com/preprints/27580/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://expansive.pubpub.org/pub/framework/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://contingentmag.org/donate/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://paulromer.net/jupyter-mathematica-and-the-future-of-the-research-paper/index.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.martineve.com/2018/08/07/open-source-patents/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.compositionality-journal.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://whereisscihub.herokuapp.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.complex-systems.com/index.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://github.com/norvig/paip-lisp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pkpservices.sfu.ca/content/conference-hosting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pkp.sfu.ca/ojs/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jocg.org/index.php/jocg/about"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://patmorin.github.io/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2018/01/why-students-are-still-spending-so-much-for-college-textbooks/551639/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://solutioperfecta.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/introduction-glossator-one-8x10.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.openhumanitiespress.org/about/community/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://acdc.amherst.edu/browse/partOf/Younghee+Kim-Wait+(Class+of+1982)_2F_Pablo+Eisenberg+Collection+of+Native+American+Literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://github.com/MimiOnuoha/missing-datasets/blob/master/README.md"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://radical.piratical.cryptonomic.net/archives/theknowledgesingularity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://journal.sjdm.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://doaj.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://codeocean.com/about"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://programming-journal.org/purpose/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fossilsandshit.com/the-future-of-scholarly-publishing/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://forumgeom.fau.edu/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pcgbook.com/about-the-book/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.7653"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sevanti-letterpress.com/download/1923-atf-specimen-book-download/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gpemjournal.blogspot.com/2013/02/gpem-141-available-online.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sarahwerner.net/blog/index.php/2012/08/a-new-contributors-contact/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2VHf5vpBy8"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pirateuniversity.org/content/pirate-university"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://boingboing.net/2012/03/19/liberating-americas-secret.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.berfrois.com/2012/03/share-books/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://opensource.com/government/11/9/open-states-transparency-state-governments-using-open-data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.infotoday.com/it/jul11/Suber-Leader-of-a-Leaderless-Revolution.shtml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thepowerofopen.org/downloads/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://researchremix.wordpress.com/2011/05/30/prelim-finding-hold-outs/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://philosophysmoker.blogspot.com/2011/05/crowd-sourcing-peer-review-free-open.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://api.plos.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.foundhistory.org/2010/12/02/stuff-digital-humanists-like/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://nationbuilder.com/politicalforce"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://placr.co.uk/blog/2011/05/why-train-departure-information-is-not-currently-open-data/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://infovegan.com/2010/08/09/how-did-weather-data-get-opened"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pawelszczesny.org/2010/08/02/open-data-citation-advantage/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.google.com/googlebooks/uspto.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2010/04/we-learn.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.boingboing.net/2010/03/08/lawrence-lessig-scar-1.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+boingboing%2FiBag+(Boing+Boing)"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/posts/gregory/020-rbp-ch6.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+RubyBestPractices+(Ruby+Best+Practices+-+Blog)"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://scienceblogs.com/effectmeasure/2010/02/the_copyright_mafia_makes_me_s.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.gale.cengage.com/fairaccess/index.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6709919.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/11/12/mpaa-shuts-down-enti.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://katinamagazine.org/content/article/open-knowledge/2025/how-fanfiction-can-help-reimagine-scholarly-publishing">
    <title>How Fanfiction Can Help Us Reimagine Scholarly Publishing | Katina Magazine</title>
    <dc:date>2026-01-18T20:38:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://katinamagazine.org/content/article/open-knowledge/2025/how-fanfiction-can-help-reimagine-scholarly-publishing</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Archive of Our Own, a digital fanfiction repository, shows what’s possible when we design our infrastructures around the communities that use them, rather than around extractive logics.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>information-architecture publishing academic-culture open-access peer-review peer-production rather-interesting crowdsourcing to-write-about to-watch</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:0ec8f47ba876/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:information-architecture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:peer-review"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:peer-production"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:crowdsourcing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-watch"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://networkcultures.org/makingpublic/2019/05/20/federated-publishing/">
    <title>Making Public | Federated Publishing: Roel Roscam Abbing in Conversation with Florian Cramer (Report)</title>
    <dc:date>2022-04-28T11:57:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://networkcultures.org/makingpublic/2019/05/20/federated-publishing/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Cramer and Roscam Abbing started by explaining what is a federated network and why it matters nowadays. Federation allows diverse entities to preserve some internal rules while still being able to communicate with each other. In this way they are able to maintain a certain degree of autonomy. Roscam Abbing pointed out that federation is not new, email and the web being old examples of it which are still in use. However, in a landscape characterized by an increasingly vicious centralization and by users’ growing awareness of their needs and the limitations of generalist platforms, federation acquires new meaning and relevance.

The subject of the conversation then became Mastodon, a Twitter-like federated social medium. Unlike Twitter, Mastodon is comprised of multiple community-owned  “instances”, that can define their own rules, modify user interface, etc. Mastodon itself is part of a bigger network called the Fediverse, which includes different applications (such as the older GNU Social or the recent PeerTube) that are able to communicate with each other thanks to underlying federation protocols such as ActivityPub or OStatus.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>federated-model publishing open-access sharing consider:vaguepress consider:partial-shares</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:514288e9c75c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:federated-model"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sharing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:consider:vaguepress"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:consider:partial-shares"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://psyarxiv.com/ft8dc/">
    <title>PsyArXiv Preprints | Is Open Science Neoliberal?</title>
    <dc:date>2021-12-17T12:09:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://psyarxiv.com/ft8dc/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The scientific reform movement, which is frequently referred to as open science, has the potential to substantially reshape how science is done, and for this reason, its socio-political antecedents and consequences deserve serious scholarly attention. In a recently formed literature that professes to meet this need, it has been widely argued that the movement is neoliberal. However, for two reasons it is hard to justify this wide-scale attribution: 1) the critics mistakenly attribute the movement a monolithic structure, and 2) the critics' arguments associating the movement with neoliberalism are highly questionable. In particular, critics too hastily associate the movement’s preferential focus on methodological issues and its underlying philosophy of science with neoliberalism, and their allegations regarding the pro-market proclivities of the reform movement do not hold under closer scrutiny. What is needed are more nuanced accounts of the socio-political underpinnings of scientific reform that show more respect to the complexity of the subject matter. To address this need, we propose a meta-model for the analysis of reform proposals, which represents methodology, axiology, science policy, and ideology as interconnected but relatively distinct domains, and allows for recognizing the divergent tendencies in the movement.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>no Betteridge's-law neoliberalism open-science open-access academic-culture academia-doesn't-guarantee-acuity</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:e79b4d7e5e50/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:no"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Betteridge's-law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:neoliberalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia-doesn't-guarantee-acuity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://openintro-ims.netlify.app/index.html">
    <title>Welcome to IMS | Introduction to Modern Statistics</title>
    <dc:date>2021-07-22T09:33:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://openintro-ims.netlify.app/index.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This is the website for Introduction to Modern Statistics, First Edition by Mine Çetinkaya-Rundel and Johanna Hardin. Introduction to Modern Statistics, which we’ll refer to as IMS going forward, is a textbook from the OpenIntro project.

The book will always be available for free here. It is also available in PDF (for free or for the amount you choose to donate to the OpenIntro project) on Leanpub and in black&white paperback for purchase for $20. 
]]></description>
<dc:subject>book statistics open-access rather-interesting</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:362c24ecafa5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:book"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:statistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://libretexts.org/mission.html">
    <title>LibreTexts - Free The Textbook</title>
    <dc:date>2021-05-28T13:50:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://libretexts.org/mission.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The LibreTexts mission is to unite students, faculty and scholars in a cooperative effort to develop an easy-to-use online platform for the construction, customization, and dissemination of open educational resources (OER) to reduce the burdens of unreasonable textbook costs to our students and society.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>publishing textbooks to-watch openness open-access academic-culture curricula law-vs-scholarship</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:b222a5f81d8e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:textbooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-watch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:curricula"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:law-vs-scholarship"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2020/02/03/a-broken-system-why-literature-searching-needs-a-fair-revolution/">
    <title>A broken system – why literature searching needs a FAIR revolution | Impact of Social Sciences</title>
    <dc:date>2020-05-02T13:11:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2020/02/03/a-broken-system-why-literature-searching-needs-a-fair-revolution/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[By developing academic search systems in this way, we can futureproof research discovery against increasingly appreciated limitations, like bias and lack of comprehensiveness, and make it an equitable and FAIR practice. In addition, we need to educate users to be able to decide which systems fit their search needs, so they use the best systems, in the best way. In this regard, we want to use our research to make the search system landscape more transparent. We hope to raise awareness among academics to be more attentive, and search system providers to elevate their quality to the necessary standard in science – for better search and better results.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>findability academic-culture publishing openness open-access library-science search-engines FAIR however:what-about-novelty?</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:40b2fe674b72/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:findability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:library-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:search-engines"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:FAIR"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:however:what-about-novelty?"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/the-value-of-openness-in-scientific-problem-solving">
    <title>The Value of Openness in Scientific Problem Solving - Harvard Business School Working Knowledge</title>
    <dc:date>2020-05-02T13:07:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/the-value-of-openness-in-scientific-problem-solving</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Openness and free information sharing amongst scientists are supposed to be core norms of the scientific community. However, many studies have shown that these norms are not universally followed. Lack of openness and transparency means that scientific problem solving is constrained to a few scientists who work in secret and who typically fail to leverage the entire accumulation of scientific knowledge available. We present evidence of the efficacy of problem solving when disclosing problem information. The method's application to 166 discrete scientific problems from the research laboratories of 26 firms is illustrated. Problems were disclosed to over 80,000 independent scientists from over 150 countries. We show that disclosure of problem information to a large group of outside solvers is an effective means of solving scientific problems. The approach solved one-third of a sample of problems that large and well-known R&D-intensive firms had been unsuccessful in solving internally. Problem-solving success was found to be associated with the ability to attract specialized solvers with range of diverse scientific interests. Furthermore, successful solvers solved problems at the boundary or outside of their fields of expertise, indicating a transfer of knowledge from one field to others.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>openness open-access publishing academic-culture Coscience to-write-about</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:c02ae04934ab/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Coscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://direct.mit.edu/books/book/4662/The-End-of-OwnershipPersonal-Property-in-the">
    <title>The End of Ownership: Personal Property in the Digital Economy | Books Gateway | MIT Press</title>
    <dc:date>2020-05-02T12:37:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://direct.mit.edu/books/book/4662/The-End-of-OwnershipPersonal-Property-in-the</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[An argument for retaining the notion of personal property in the products we “buy” in the digital marketplace.
If you buy a book at the bookstore, you own it. You can take it home, scribble in the margins, put in on the shelf, lend it to a friend, sell it at a garage sale. But is the same thing true for the ebooks or other digital goods you buy? Retailers and copyright holders argue that you don't own those purchases, you merely license them. That means your ebook vendor can delete the book from your device without warning or explanation—as Amazon deleted Orwell's 1984 from the Kindles of surprised readers several years ago. These readers thought they owned their copies of 1984. Until, it turned out, they didn't. In The End of Ownership, Aaron Perzanowski and Jason Schultz explore how notions of ownership have shifted in the digital marketplace, and make an argument for the benefits of personal property.
Of course, ebooks, cloud storage, streaming, and other digital goods offer users convenience and flexibility. But, Perzanowski and Schultz warn, consumers should be aware of the tradeoffs involving user constraints, permanence, and privacy. The rights of private property are clear, but few people manage to read their end user agreements. Perzanowski and Schultz argue that introducing aspects of private property and ownership into the digital marketplace would offer both legal and economic benefits. But, most important, it would affirm our sense of self-direction and autonomy. If we own our purchases, we are free to make whatever lawful use of them we please. Technology need not constrain our freedom; it can also empower us.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>book open-access personal-property ownership publishing rather-interesting have-read to-write-about</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:36eba0817958/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:book"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:personal-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:ownership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:have-read"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2020/1/241717-publish-and-perish/fulltext">
    <title>Publish and Perish | January 2020 | Communications of the ACM</title>
    <dc:date>2020-05-02T11:49:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2020/1/241717-publish-and-perish/fulltext</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Over the past decade I have penned several columns that were critical of the current computing-research publication system, with its heavy reliance on conference publishing. These columns were widely read, and the feedback I received was generally quite positive, but they had zero impact on how we go about publishing our research. Conferences still provide the main vehicle for dissemination of curated computing research. What did I miss?

]]></description>
<dc:subject>peer-review academic-culture publishing calls-to-action open-access</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:bfdc9abddb30/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:peer-review"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:calls-to-action"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.ogrants.org/">
    <title>Home · Open Grants</title>
    <dc:date>2020-04-27T21:52:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.ogrants.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[An increasing number of researchers are sharing their grant proposals openly. They do this to open up science so that all stages of the process can benefit from better interaction and communication and to provide examples for early career scientists writing grants. This is a list of 206 of these proposals to help you find them.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>grants open-access academic-culture rather-interesting transparency open-science to-write-about not-visibly-thriving-tho</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:eacb13597230/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:grants"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:transparency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:not-visibly-thriving-tho"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/7/4/65">
    <title>Publications | Free Full-Text | Open Science in the Humanities, or: Open Humanities?</title>
    <dc:date>2020-01-19T13:54:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/7/4/65</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Open science refers to both the practices and norms of more open and transparent communication and research in scientific disciplines and the discourse on these practices and norms. There is no such discourse dedicated to the humanities. Though the humanities appear to be less coherent as a cluster of scholarship than the sciences are, they do share unique characteristics which lead to distinct scholarly communication and research practices. A discourse on making these practices more open and transparent needs to take account of these characteristics. The prevalent scientific perspective in the discourse on more open practices does not do so, which confirms that the discourse’s name, open science, indeed excludes the humanities so that talking about open science in the humanities is incoherent. In this paper, I argue that there needs to be a dedicated discourse for more open research and communication practices in the humanities, one that integrates several elements currently fragmented into smaller, unconnected discourses (such as on open access, preprints, or peer review). I discuss three essential elements of open science—preprints, open peer review practices, and liberal open licences—in the realm of the humanities to demonstrate why a dedicated open humanities discourse is required. View Full-Text
]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-access publishing academic-culture humanities disintermediation-in-action gatekeepers cultural-assumptions rather-interesting to-read</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:e562f0adab8e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:humanities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-in-action"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:gatekeepers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-read"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2209188&amp;gt">
    <title>The Historical Origins of 'Open Science': An Essay on Patronage, Reputation and Common Agency Contracting in the Scientific Revolution by Paul A. David :: SSRN</title>
    <dc:date>2020-01-19T13:53:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2209188&amp;gt</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This essay examines the economics of patronage in the production of knowledge and its influence upon the historical formation of key elements in the ethos and organizational structure of publicly funded 'open science.' The emergence during the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries of the idea and practice of 'open science' was a distinctive and vital organizational aspect of the Scientific Revolution. It represented a break from the previously dominant ethos of secrecy in the pursuit of Nature's Secrets, to a new set of norms, incentives, and organizational structures that reinforced scientific researchers' commitments to rapid disclosure of new knowledge. The rise of 'cooperative rivalries' in the revelation of new knowledge, is seen as a functional response to heightened asymmetric information problems posed for the Renaissance system of court-patronage of the arts and sciences; pre-existing informational asymmetries had been exacerbated by the claims of mathematicians and the increasing practical reliance upon new mathematical techniques in a variety of 'contexts of application.' Reputational competition among Europe's noble patrons motivated much of their efforts to attract to their courts the most prestigious natural philosophers, was no less crucial in the workings of that system than was the concern among their would-be clients to raise their peer-based reputational status. In late Renaissance Europe, the feudal legacy of fragmented political authority had resulted in relations between noble patrons and their savantclients that resembled the situation modern economists describe as `common agency contracting in substitutes' - competition among incompletely informed principals for the dedicated services of multiple agents. These conditions tended to result in contract terms (especially with regard to autonomy and financial support) that left agent client members of the nascent scientific communities better positioned to retain larger information rents on their specialized knowledge. This encouraged entry into their emerging disciplines, and enabled them collectively to develop a stronger degree of professional autonomy for their programs of inquiry within the increasingly specialized and formal scientific academies (such the Académie royale des Sciences and the Royal Society) that had attracted the patronage of rival absolutist States of Western Europe during the latter part of the seventeenth century. The institutionalization of 'open science' that took place within those settings is shown to have continuities with the use by scientists of the earlier humanist academies, and with the logic of regal patronage, rather than being driven by the material requirements of new observational and experimental techniques.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-access open-science history prestige academic-culture hierarchy pecking-order reputation to-read sociology social-capital history-of-science</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:2dc51d785ed9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:prestige"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:hierarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pecking-order"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:reputation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-read"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sociology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-capital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:history-of-science"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://dimenovels.lib.niu.edu/">
    <title>Nickels and Dimes | Dime Novels from the Collections of Johannsen and LeBlanc</title>
    <dc:date>2020-01-19T01:45:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://dimenovels.lib.niu.edu/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Dime novels were a format of inexpensive popular fiction produced in the United States between 1860 and 1930. Available for as little as a nickel or as much as a dime, they opened up leisure reading for the masses in a way previously not possible. Originally featuring stories about the American frontier and the West, cowboys eventually gave way to detectives, like Nick Carter, and boy adventurers and entrepreneurs, like Frank Reade Jr. This site contains materials from two major dime novel collections in Rare Books and Special Collections at Northern Illinois University, the Albert Johannsen and Edward T. LeBlanc Collections. It also hosts the Johannsen Project, a collaboration between NIU and Villanova University, generously supported by a Digitizing Hidden Collections grant from the Council on Library and Information Resources (CLIR). Visitors may browse the entire full-text collection, explore a particular series or author, or start at our about pages to learn more about dime novels.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>digitization digital-humanities periodicals library collection open-access to-write-about</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:b40ff69fccaf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:digitization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:digital-humanities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:periodicals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:library"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.molbiolcell.org/doi/10.1091/mbc.E19-03-0147">
    <title>From symbiont to parasite: the evolution of for-profit science publishing | Molecular Biology of the Cell</title>
    <dc:date>2019-11-03T20:50:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.molbiolcell.org/doi/10.1091/mbc.E19-03-0147</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Two 17th century institutions—learned societies and scientific journals—transformed science in ways that still dominate our professional lives today. Learned societies like the American Society for Cell Biology remain relevant because they provide forums for sharing results, discussing the practice of science, and projecting our voices to the public and the policy makers. Scientific journals still disseminate our work, but in the Internet-connected world of the 21st century, this is no longer their critical function. Journals remain relevant almost entirely because they provide a playing field for scientific and professional competition: to claim credit for a discovery, we publish it in a peer-reviewed journal; to get a job in academia or money to run a lab, we present these published papers to universities and funding agencies. Publishing is so embedded in the practice of science that whoever controls the journals controls access to the entire profession. We must reform our methods for evaluating the contributions of younger scientists and deflate the power of a small number of "elite" journals. More generally, given the recent failure of research institutions around the world to strike satisfactory deals with publishing giant Elsevier, the time has come to examine the motives and methods of those to whom we have entrusted the keys to the kingdom of science.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>publishing academic-culture open-access corporatism parasitism cultural-assumptions cultural-norms radical-access to-write-about</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:dedfca020b39/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:corporatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:parasitism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:radical-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://blueoakcouncil.org/examples">
    <title>Blue Oak Council Examples</title>
    <dc:date>2019-04-14T12:25:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://blueoakcouncil.org/examples</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This page links to example language showing how contracts, policies, and other documents can reference the Blue Oak Council’s license list and model license to set rules about software licensing.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>law contracts worklife open-access consulting rather-interesting</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:7637ad51124b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:contracts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:worklife"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:consulting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://communemag.com/the-end-of-the-line/">
    <title>The End of the Line • Commune</title>
    <dc:date>2019-03-24T12:19:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://communemag.com/the-end-of-the-line/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The practice of mapping infrastructure in order to disrupt it has spread throughout the ecological activist milieu. On the other side of the Detroit River a leg of the Enbridge pipeline system called Line 9 has been disabled multiple times, for example. Pump stations are located above ground along the route of the pipeline at regular intervals, and can be disabled by simply turning a wheel. This “valve-turning” tactic has since been repeated elsewhere, as information about pipeline resistance gets disseminated.

While the fossil fuel infrastructure in its planetary girth is as impossible to grasp as the cataclysmic enormity of climate change, a single pipeline or even a network of pipelines is comprehensible: it is a long arrow pointing from departure to destination. Not only do pipelines make the global flows of capital legible, they render them tractable, connecting struggles waged thousands of miles apart. There are approximately seventy-two thousand miles of crude oil pipe in the US. These pipelines establish a material link, and a basis for real solidarity between disparate groups, connecting a blockade in Michigan to the struggle of indigenous people in Ontario, connecting black and Latinx Detroiters fighting against a refinery to resistance against the Athabasca oil sands thousands of miles away. These oil-based networks are both the source of our misery and the basis of our hope that we might transcend it.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:twitter infrastructure protest collective-action open-access intelligence-gathering corporatism activism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:c1e215e3ed94/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:infrastructure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:protest"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collective-action"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intelligence-gathering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:corporatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:activism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://peerj.com/preprints/27580/">
    <title>Ten myths around open scholarly publishing [PeerJ Preprints]</title>
    <dc:date>2019-03-17T12:25:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://peerj.com/preprints/27580/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The changing world of scholarly communication and the emergence of ‘Open Science’ or ‘Open Research’ has brought to light a number of controversial and hotly-debated topics. Yet, evidence-based rational debate is regularly drowned out by misinformed or exaggerated rhetoric, which does not benefit the evolving system of scholarly communication. The aim of this article is to provide a baseline evidence framework for ten of the most contested topics, in order to help frame and move forward discussions, practices and policies. We address preprints and scooping, the practice of copyright transfer, the function of peer review, and the legitimacy of ‘global’ databases. The presented facts and data will be a powerful tool against misinformation across wider academic research, policy and practice, and may be used to inform changes within the rapidly evolving scholarly publishing system.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-access arXiv preprints academic-culture cultural-norms one-funeral-at-a-atime publishing</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:abd025bce4fc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:arXiv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:preprints"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:one-funeral-at-a-atime"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://expansive.pubpub.org/pub/framework/">
    <title>A Framework for Library Support of Expansive Digital Publishing</title>
    <dc:date>2019-03-01T13:26:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://expansive.pubpub.org/pub/framework/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[What is expansive digital publishing? We use the term "expansive" to characterize online publications that challenge current systems and expectations of publishing, primarily because they push against and beyond the limits we typically use to successfully manage publications. These works are often undertaken by scholars at multiple institutions and in different fields; use many different technologies; have multiple scholarly outputs; grow over time; operate over the long-term or are multi-phase; aim to engage with multiple audiences; and, in general, use digital tools and methods to explore or enable scholarship that would be more difficult to achieve through traditional publishing.]]></description>
<dc:subject>academic-culture publishing open-access scholarship libraries to-write-about</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:c94ad6fd9667/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:scholarship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:libraries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://contingentmag.org/donate/">
    <title>Donate | CONTINGENT</title>
    <dc:date>2019-02-23T12:46:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://contingentmag.org/donate/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Beginning March 4, Contingent will publish high-quality, accessible content about the past and the many ways we understand it. Your donations will allow us to pay our contributors for their work, pay the staff who’ll keep the magazine going, and maintain the infrastructure necessary to run a digital non-profit.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>history open-access nonprofit rather-interesting publishing to-watch to-do</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:d6397bfa6bda/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:nonprofit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-watch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-do"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://paulromer.net/jupyter-mathematica-and-the-future-of-the-research-paper/index.html">
    <title>Jupyter, Mathematica, and the Future of the Research Paper – Paul Romer</title>
    <dc:date>2018-11-01T09:08:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://paulromer.net/jupyter-mathematica-and-the-future-of-the-research-paper/index.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Jupyter rewards transparency; Mathematica rationalizes secrecy. Jupyter encourages individual integrity; Mathematica lets individuals hide behind corporate evasion. Jupyter exemplifies the social systems that emerged from the Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment, systems that make it possible for people to cooperate by committing to objective truth; Mathematica exemplifies the horde of new Vandals whose pursuit of private gain threatens a far greater pubic loss–the collapse of social systems that took centuries to build.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>data-analysis user-experience open-source academic-culture startup-culture-must-die literate-programming open-access literary-criticism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:11cfc2159c75/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:data-analysis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:user-experience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-source"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:startup-culture-must-die"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:literate-programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:literary-criticism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.martineve.com/2018/08/07/open-source-patents/">
    <title>Institutional Cultures, Patents, and Open-Source Software for Open Access | Martin Paul Eve | Professor of Literature, Technology and Publishing</title>
    <dc:date>2018-08-08T11:52:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.martineve.com/2018/08/07/open-source-patents/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[As you may know, the Centre for Technology and Publishing at Birkbeck publishes and maintains a piece of open-source software for journal publishing called Janeway. This software is licensed under the AGPLv3.

We chose this license for several reasons, but the most important was that we wanted strong CopyLeft protection, including for server-side usage, on this software. Other journal publishing software has been used extensively by for-profit third parties who refuse to contribute their modifications back into the open ecosystem. We do not wish to develop software that can be made subject to corporate, for-profit enclosure. Given recent acquisitions by Elsevier, this seems all the more important at this time. This seemed, to us, to offer the best deal for the community who pursue open access, as it is advocated for inside many academic libraries.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-access open-source licensing intellectual-property cultural-norms institutional-design public-policy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a4a564921b3d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-source"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:institutional-design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.compositionality-journal.org/">
    <title>About · Compositionality</title>
    <dc:date>2018-07-29T09:39:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.compositionality-journal.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Compositionality describes and quantifies how complex things can be assembled out of simpler parts. Compositionality, the journal, is a new open-access journal for research using compositional ideas, most notably of a category-theoretic origin, in any discipline. Topics may concern foundational structures, an organizing principle, or a powerful tool. Example areas include but are not limited to: computation, logic, physics, chemistry, engineering, linguistics, and cognition.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-access journals publishing nonprofit rather-interesting to-understand</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:72f322ad6584/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:journals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:nonprofit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-understand"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://whereisscihub.herokuapp.com/">
    <title>Where is Sci-Hub now?</title>
    <dc:date>2018-03-15T14:59:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://whereisscihub.herokuapp.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Sci-Hub is currently available at:]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-access publishing disintermediation-in-action damn-straight</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:fa2a5c78c25a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-in-action"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:damn-straight"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.complex-systems.com/index.html">
    <title>Complex Systems</title>
    <dc:date>2018-03-11T10:30:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.complex-systems.com/index.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Founded by Stephen Wolfram in 1987 »
The original journal devoted to the science, mathematics and engineering of systems with simple components but complex overall behavior.

Hundreds of published papers, encompassing three decades of leading-edge complex systems research, are available for free and immediate download.]]></description>
<dc:subject>journal complexology nudge-targets open-access</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:8ebdb78c97c3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:journal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:complexology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:nudge-targets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://github.com/norvig/paip-lisp">
    <title>norvig/paip-lisp: Lisp code for the textbook &quot;Paradigms of Artificial Intelligence Programming&quot;</title>
    <dc:date>2018-02-27T11:57:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://github.com/norvig/paip-lisp</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This is the repository for the book Paradigms of Artificial Intelligence Programming: Case Studies in Common Lisp by Peter Norvig (1992). Here you'll find:

A directory of all the Lisp code from the book.
A pdf of the book, split into two parts (because GitHub can't handle big files) covering Chapters 1-14 (PAIP-part1.pdf) and 15-25 (PAIP-part2.pdf). The copyright has recently reverted to me, and I choose to share it under MIT license.
A rough txt export, from the pdf, PAIP.txt, containing many errors.
As seen on TV. See also: errata, comments, preface, retrospective.]]></description>
<dc:subject>book programming Lisp open-access</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:83812c883a79/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:book"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Lisp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://pkpservices.sfu.ca/content/conference-hosting">
    <title>Conference Hosting | PKP Publishing Services</title>
    <dc:date>2018-02-04T14:07:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://pkpservices.sfu.ca/content/conference-hosting</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Interested in using Open Conference Systems (OCS) for your upcoming conference or event? We can provide a permanent home for recurring conferences or give you a short-term space for a one-time event.

For an annual fee we will:

install OCS on our servers
get you started with initial setup and training support
provide daily backups (seven days incremental, other regimens available for an additional fee)
upgrade the software
ensure that your content is highly visible on the web.
Leave the technical details to us, and get on with your event!

]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-access hosted-solutions academic-culture rather-interesting to-understand maybe-not-but-still publishing</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:278d3cdd735b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:hosted-solutions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-understand"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:maybe-not-but-still"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://pkp.sfu.ca/ojs/">
    <title>Open Journal Systems | Public Knowledge Project</title>
    <dc:date>2018-02-04T14:05:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://pkp.sfu.ca/ojs/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Open Journal Systems (OJS) is a journal management and publishing system that has been developed by the Public Knowledge Project through its federally funded efforts to expand and improve access to research.]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-access publishing academia rather-interesting to-understand to-write-about</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:d43d9fb327b1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-understand"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jocg.org/index.php/jocg/about">
    <title>About the Journal</title>
    <dc:date>2018-02-04T14:01:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://jocg.org/index.php/jocg/about</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[fully open-access journal with explicit integration into distributed scholarly archives and libraries]]></description>
<dc:subject>computational-geometry open-access publishing to-write-about to-do</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:cca6ab1bb48e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:computational-geometry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-do"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://patmorin.github.io/">
    <title>Open Problems</title>
    <dc:date>2018-02-04T13:59:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://patmorin.github.io/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>open-problems open-access computational-geometry rather-interesting several-reasons to-write-about</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:8644093ac33b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-problems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:computational-geometry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:several-reasons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2018/01/why-students-are-still-spending-so-much-for-college-textbooks/551639/">
    <title>How Access Codes Keep College-Textbook Costs High - The Atlantic</title>
    <dc:date>2018-01-28T12:42:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2018/01/why-students-are-still-spending-so-much-for-college-textbooks/551639/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[After settling into his dorm this past fall, John McGrath, a freshman at Rutgers University, took the campus shuttle to the school bookstore. He waited in line for 40 minutes clutching a list of four classes—including Microeconomics, Introduction to Calculus, and Expository Writing—and walked out later with an armful of books, some bundled with digital codes that he would use to access assignments on the publishers’ websites. He also exited the store with a bill for about $450.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>academic-culture publishing disintermediation-targets pedagogy somebody-has-to-pay-the-rent-bullshit open-access</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:0b60e6517e74/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-targets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:somebody-has-to-pay-the-rent-bullshit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://solutioperfecta.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/introduction-glossator-one-8x10.pdf">
    <title>Glossator Volume 1, Introduction (PDF)</title>
    <dc:date>2018-01-08T11:02:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://solutioperfecta.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/introduction-glossator-one-8x10.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Take these epigraphs as a small garland, a chain of flowers collected from Glossator’s first volume, presented here both in gratitude to their authors and for the reader, as a poetic suggestion of the work their contributions are doing, individually and collectively. Read them closely and you will find that they comment on each other, even conduct a subtle conversation (found or made?), a dialogue composed—like all commentary—of a mysterious intersection between a reading subject and a textual object. This dialogue concerns especially the ambivalent creativity of commentary, its operation as a complex formal space defined by decidedly mixed characteristics and impulses: exposure, critique, renewal, freedom, possession, constraint, superfluity, belatedness, excess, irrelevance, openness . . .
According to Giorgio Agamben’s diagnosis, it is precisely the “loss of commentary and the gloss as creative forms” that attests to the impossibility of “any healing” in Western culture “between Halacha and Aggada, between shari’at and haqīqat, between subject matter and truth content.”1 To this schism we may add, as a rough parallel, that between practice and theory, the proportionally inseparable variables included in this journal’s title with deliberate emphasis on the priority of the former as what holds the key to both (practice founds theory). In light of this priority—we want commentary, really, send us COMMENTARIES!—the primary editorial challenges of this volume lay in negotiating the minority of submissions employing the apparatus of formal, running commentary and the unexpected number of hybrid submissions: commentarial work addressing commentary. A volume neatly divided into writings about commentary and actual commentaries turned out to be impossible. But this impossibility now appears as a more propitious start than the editors could have planned, the index of a less predictable and more authentic desire for commentary, a creative beginning.]]></description>
<dc:subject>meta-literature commentary literary-criticism open-access to-read to-do rather-interesting</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:d0e85414c473/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:meta-literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:commentary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:literary-criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-read"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-do"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.openhumanitiespress.org/about/community/">
    <title>Open Humanities Press– Community</title>
    <dc:date>2018-01-08T10:57:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.openhumanitiespress.org/about/community/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[OHP is an international community of scholars, editors and readers with a focus on critical and cultural theory. We have operated as a independent volunteer initiative since 2006, promoting open access scholarship in journals, books and exploring new forms of scholarly communication.OHP’s organization is a community interest company headquarted in London. Its Directors are Gary Hall, Sigi Jöttkandt and David Ottina. The OHP Editorial Board is at the heart of all our activities: participating in journal assessments, reviewing and approving book series proposals, performing and managing peer review, and editing the OHP book series. We act on the principles of access, scholarship, diversity and transparency. We have partnered with a number of groups and institutions to explore grass-roots solutions to the crisis in Humanities publishing. You can find readings and podcasts about our Radical OA philosophy, and more information about open access. Please feel free to contact us with suggestions, support, book proposals or join our mailing list for updates.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>academic-culture publishing humanities to-write-about to-do open-access rather-interesting</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:017fd9bcfafc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:humanities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-do"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://acdc.amherst.edu/browse/partOf/Younghee+Kim-Wait+(Class+of+1982)_2F_Pablo+Eisenberg+Collection+of+Native+American+Literature">
    <title>Amherst College Digital Collections</title>
    <dc:date>2018-01-07T18:30:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://acdc.amherst.edu/browse/partOf/Younghee+Kim-Wait+(Class+of+1982)_2F_Pablo+Eisenberg+Collection+of+Native+American+Literature</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>user-interface digitization open-access could-be-better</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:87fa8896a571/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:user-interface"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:digitization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:could-be-better"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://github.com/MimiOnuoha/missing-datasets/blob/master/README.md">
    <title>missing-datasets/README.md at master · MimiOnuoha/missing-datasets · GitHub</title>
    <dc:date>2017-09-25T13:03:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://github.com/MimiOnuoha/missing-datasets/blob/master/README.md</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>data-science data activism public-policy open-access</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a9a0a174eca1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:data-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:activism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://radical.piratical.cryptonomic.net/archives/theknowledgesingularity">
    <title>archives:theknowledgesingularity [RADiCAL.PiRATiCAL]</title>
    <dc:date>2017-08-27T12:35:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://radical.piratical.cryptonomic.net/archives/theknowledgesingularity</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[But libraries have a problem. And that problem is that they are not controlling their own fate. They have been in charge of their own fate as long as they had their own legal exceptions, their spaces in which they were free to operate. But that moment has passed with the digital landing. And now instead of being in control of their own fate and adapting to whatever is expected of them to provide, they are forced to act as unwilling enforcers of copyrights and ideas that they do not necessarily agree with. And that's a very unpleasant place to be. Very unpleasant also because they are the ones being held responsible for whatever shadow librarians are doing. They are the ones who are leaking those documents. They are the ones who are made responsible for not allowing any leak of these articles and not allowing any leak of their digital books. And it will be their future on the strings if copyright holders decide to punish libraries for the actions of the shadow librarians. For that, the fate of libraries carries a really nice promise, if you like. And that promise is the extraterritoriality of the library.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-access academic-culture publishing public-policy libraries to-write-about</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:68e5bcdd9cdc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:libraries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://journal.sjdm.org/">
    <title>Judgment and Decision Making, Journal Home Page</title>
    <dc:date>2017-08-05T11:46:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://journal.sjdm.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This is the journal of the Society for Judgment and Decision Making (SJDM) and the European Association for Decision Making (EADM). It is open access, published on the World Wide Web, at least every two months. We have no author fees so far.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>journal psychology open-access rather-interesting to-read</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:d4579baaab41/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:journal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-read"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://doaj.org/">
    <title>Directory of Open Access Journals</title>
    <dc:date>2017-07-22T14:19:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://doaj.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
DOAJ is a community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-access academic-culture publishing rss to-understand</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:378573cf7b4f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rss"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-understand"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://codeocean.com/about">
    <title>About | Code Ocean</title>
    <dc:date>2017-05-25T19:41:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://codeocean.com/about</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Code Ocean is a cloud-based computational reproducibility platform that provides researchers and developers an easy way to share, discover and run code published in academic journals and conferences.
More and more of today's research includes software code, statistical analysis and algorithms that are not included in traditional publishing. But they are often essential to reproducing the research results and reusing them in a new product or research. This creates a major roadblock for researchers, one that inspired the first steps of Code Ocean as part of the 2014 Runway Startup Postdoc Program at the Jacobs Technion Cornell Institute. Today, the company employs more than 10 people and officially launched the product in February 2017.
For the first time, researchers, engineers, developers and scientists can upload code and data in 10 programming languages and link working code in a computational environment with the associated article for free. We assign a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) to the algorithm, providing correct attribution and a connection to the published research.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>software-development-is-not-programming open-access open-source academic-culture reproducibility</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:bb1d6f516b77/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:software-development-is-not-programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-source"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:reproducibility"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://programming-journal.org/purpose/">
    <title>Purpose and Operation</title>
    <dc:date>2017-04-17T12:06:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://programming-journal.org/purpose/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The Art, Science, and Engineering of Programming journal is a fully refereed, open access, free, electronic journal. It welcomes papers on the art of programming, broadly construed (see Call for Papers).

Papers are refereed in the traditional way, with two or more referees per paper. Copyright is retained by the authors. Full-text access to all papers is freely available. No registration or subscription is required. Authors of published papers may be invited to present their work in partnering conferences.

The journal is published by AOSA, a non-profit organization whose purpose is to facilitate the dissemination of scholarly works pertaining to programming.

Papers are prepared in LaTeX and submitted electronically as PDF files. On acceptance, authors are asked to provide all source files as specified in the Information for Authors.

Papers can be submitted at any time, but the journal reviews papers in batch, three or more times per year. The batch processing is designed to keep everyone involved (editors, reviewers and authors) on track, and to establish a strong sense of predictability for when specific activities are to happen. The goal is to have a fast turnaround of four months from start to end of each reviewing cycle.

The journal is divided into volumes, one per year, each with several issues. The issues correspond directly to the reviewing batches.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:geepawhill computer-science rather-interesting open-access journal academic-culture publishing arXiv</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:bf8bfb8b9947/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:geepawhill"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:computer-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:journal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:arXiv"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fossilsandshit.com/the-future-of-scholarly-publishing/">
    <title>The future of scholarly publishing – Green Tea and Velociraptors</title>
    <dc:date>2017-02-13T11:30:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://fossilsandshit.com/the-future-of-scholarly-publishing/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[If we were to have to invent the scholarly publishing system again from scratch today, what would it look like?

Our current system of publishing is basically identical to that of what it was in the 1990s, before the emergence of a vast array of internet-based technologies, loosely termed Web 2.0. A research paper is a 20th century format, published in a 17th century container – the journal.

Ironically, this system still persists despite the blatant fact that anyone can publish anything they want at the touch of a button these days. Yet scholarly publishing still usually takes months, and some times takes even years, just to upload content to the Web.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:twitter scholarship academic-culture public-policy open-access</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:f00991b4575e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:scholarship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://forumgeom.fau.edu/">
    <title>Forum Geometricorum</title>
    <dc:date>2017-02-11T14:47:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://forumgeom.fau.edu/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>geometry lovely open-access journal mathematics mathematical-recreations computational-geometry nudge-targets to-write-about</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:b03d9b81851c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:geometry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:lovely"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:journal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:mathematics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:mathematical-recreations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:computational-geometry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:nudge-targets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://pcgbook.com/about-the-book/">
    <title>About the book | Procedural Content Generation in Games</title>
    <dc:date>2014-07-22T12:44:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://pcgbook.com/about-the-book/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This book gives an introduction to the field of Procedural Content Generation for Games (PCG): the automatic or computer-assisted generation of game content such as levels, landscapes, items, rules, quests etc. PCG is currently a hot topic in both game development and academic game research, and university courses on the topic are starting to crop up. This book is built around the MSc-level course on PCG that is being taught at the IT University of Copenhagen. Each chapter corresponds to one lecture; the chapter is written before the lecture, and revised after the lecture based on comments from students, coauthors and anyone else who posts a comment on the blog post announcing the chapter. Students are also assigned original research papers as additional reading; see the course website for more details.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>generative-art engineering-design content-generation algorithms performance-measure user-centric-design open-access textbook computer-science philosophy-of-engineering</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:3dae9950b3b9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:generative-art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:engineering-design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:content-generation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:performance-measure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:user-centric-design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:textbook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:computer-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy-of-engineering"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.7653">
    <title>[1304.7653] Usage History of Scientific Literature: Nature Metrics and Metrics of Nature Publications</title>
    <dc:date>2014-04-15T10:42:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.7653</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[In this study, we analyze the dynamic usage history of Nature publications over time using Nature metrics data. We conduct analysis from two perspectives. On the one hand, we examine how long it takes before the articles' downloads reach 50%/80% of the total; on the other hand, we compare the percentage of total downloads in 7 days, 30 days, and 100 days after publication. In general, papers are downloaded most frequently within a short time period right after their publication. And we find that compared with Non-Open Access papers, readers' attention on Open Access publications are more enduring. Based on the usage data of a newly published paper, regression analysis could predict the future expected total usage counts.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>academic-culture publishing citation news-cycle disintermediation-in-action open-access interesting consider:what-might-happen-with-updating</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:6340761b6515/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:citation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:news-cycle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-in-action"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:consider:what-might-happen-with-updating"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://sevanti-letterpress.com/download/1923-atf-specimen-book-download/">
    <title>1923 atf specimen book download - sevanti letterpress</title>
    <dc:date>2013-02-25T22:05:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://sevanti-letterpress.com/download/1923-atf-specimen-book-download/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["[...] the seminal 1923 edition of the american type founders (atf) specimen book. considered by many to be the culmination of specimen printing [...]"]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:chl typography typeface digitization open-access public-domain graphic-design</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:1c21614e5781/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:chl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:typography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:typeface"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:digitization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-domain"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:graphic-design"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://gpemjournal.blogspot.com/2013/02/gpem-141-available-online.html">
    <title>Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines: GPEM 14(1) available online</title>
    <dc:date>2013-02-17T14:19:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://gpemjournal.blogspot.com/2013/02/gpem-141-available-online.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The first issue of volume 14 of Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines is now available online, containing...]]></description>
<dc:subject>genetic-programming journals open-access kinda</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:24f15bed8d09/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:genetic-programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:journals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:kinda"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://sarahwerner.net/blog/index.php/2012/08/a-new-contributors-contact/">
    <title>a new contributor’s contact! » Wynken de Worde</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-13T15:32:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://sarahwerner.net/blog/index.php/2012/08/a-new-contributors-contact/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[And one plea to all of you: Ask for what’s in your right to have. Please do this. And please tell us about doing this. Scholarly publishing is in a world of change right now, and we are all finding our way. My experience is that most publishers are finding their ways just as much as most authors are. The more we work together and share our experiences, the more chance we all have of finding a fair way forward.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>for-aaronsw intellectual-property academic-culture publishing contracts advice openness open-access</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:326b52bc9d6c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:for-aaronsw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:contracts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:advice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2VHf5vpBy8">
    <title>F2C2012: Eben Moglen keynote - &quot;Innovation under Austerity&quot; - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2012-06-28T11:36:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2VHf5vpBy8</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Eben Moglen keynote - "Innovation under Austerity" at F2C:Freedom to Connect 2012, Washington DC on May 22 2012. "]]></description>
<dc:subject>economics open-access innovation corporatism stirring-speeches watch-the-comments</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:6c06a60e6745/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:corporatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:stirring-speeches"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:watch-the-comments"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.pirateuniversity.org/content/pirate-university">
    <title>The Pirate University | Pirate university</title>
    <dc:date>2012-06-22T11:27:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.pirateuniversity.org/content/pirate-university</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The Pirate University is an on-line bulletin board on which students post requests for academic publications. You can compare it to an academic wish list. Others, who know where to find these publications, reply and if possible, provide links to the resources searched. The Pirate University is not providing, storing or sharing copyrighted material.

An important question is if the uploading of articles, publications is legal. If you are the copyright holder of the article requested, there should be no problem. Also in certain cases, if you or your institute have acquired the rights of the publication, or if it is free of rights, there shouldn't be a problem. It is probably best to consult with your librarian to see which kind of publication is okay to share on the Internet."]]></description>
<dc:subject>academic-culture publishing collaboration crowdsourcing librarians open-access scholarship</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:982f86355aff/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:crowdsourcing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:librarians"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:scholarship"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/">
    <title>Journal of Digital Humanities</title>
    <dc:date>2012-04-09T13:40:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The Journal of Digital Humanities is a comprehensive, peer-reviewed, open access journal that features the best scholarship, tools, and conversations produced by the digital humanities community in the previous quarter."]]></description>
<dc:subject>digital-humanities journal open-access publishing</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:7f4d398ccc84/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:digital-humanities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:journal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://boingboing.net/2012/03/19/liberating-americas-secret.html">
    <title>Liberating America's secret, for-pay laws - Boing Boing</title>
    <dc:date>2012-03-21T11:40:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://boingboing.net/2012/03/19/liberating-americas-secret.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Upon the close of the May 1 comment period, it is our intention to begin posting these 73 standards in HTML and begin the process of providing a unified, easy-to-use interface to all public safety standards in the Code of Federal Regulations. It is also our intention to continue this effort to include all standards specifically incorporated by reference in the 50 states. That the law must be available to citizens is a cardinal principle of law in countries such as India and the United Kingdom, and we will expand our efforts to include those jurisdictions as well."]]></description>
<dc:subject>occupy-government open-access intellectual-property digitization why-we-scan</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:4c5d687b569d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:occupy-government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:digitization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:why-we-scan"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.berfrois.com/2012/03/share-books/">
    <title>Share Books | berfrois</title>
    <dc:date>2012-03-18T10:27:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.berfrois.com/2012/03/share-books/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Libraries are a recognition that scholarship and culture are more than the business of creating and consuming. They are a human conversation, and libraries provide common ground where that conversation can take place and be remembered. By taking aim at the right for the public to maintain this conversation and its memory, publishers have shown us what we have to lose. It’s time we resisted the outsourcing of our common heritage by occupying the library."]]></description>
<dc:subject>Occupy libraries intellectual-property open-access public-policy activism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:711fbd79dafb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Occupy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:libraries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:activism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://opensource.com/government/11/9/open-states-transparency-state-governments-using-open-data">
    <title>Open states: Transparency for state governments using open data | opensource.com</title>
    <dc:date>2011-10-01T12:47:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://opensource.com/government/11/9/open-states-transparency-state-governments-using-open-data</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[What is the biggest impact Open States has had to date?

I suppose it depends on what kind of impact we're talking about. Governments are slowly coming to terms with this and we've seen states like Minnesota and Kansas start to move towards machine-readable access of their data—and I think we can take some of the credit for that. A big part of it is that they just have smart people working there that get the importance of making this data available in as many ways as possible.

I'm particularly partial to the impact that the project has had on individuals. Sunlight open sources everything we do, and as a result, we have over 130 projects on GitHub. Most of these projects aren't things that the average developer uses, so they don't see a ton of attention from outside developers. Open States has been a real success in a unique way—it has gotten developers that were otherwise unaware of open government involved. We've had contributions from approximately 50 developers, ranging from minor tweaks to a parser to fix an error that a user noticed to entire states contributed. I think it has made a real impact in providing a gentle introduction for developers looking for a way to contribute.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-access openness government2.0 transparency commons</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:e7774f133f00/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:government2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:transparency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:commons"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.infotoday.com/it/jul11/Suber-Leader-of-a-Leaderless-Revolution.shtml">
    <title>INTERVIEW - Suber: Leader of a Leaderless Revolution</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-15T13:14:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.infotoday.com/it/jul11/Suber-Leader-of-a-Leaderless-Revolution.shtml</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["  Q: As your answer indicates, there is more to OA than green and gold alone; there is also gratis and libre OA. In 2008, you produced a grid demonstrating the four-way relationship among the different types of OA. Can you expand on this, and outline the relative merits of gratis and libre OA? 

A: Gratis OA is simply free of charge. But it’s not more free than that. Gratis literature may stand under all-rights-reserved copyrights and give users no more rights than they already had under fair use (or fair dealing).

Libre OA is free of charge and free of at least some copyright and licensing restrictions. Libre literature stands under some-rights-reserved copyrights, at most, and permits uses that exceed fair use. The advantage of libre OA is that researchers needn’t slow down to ask permission for legitimate scholarly uses that exceed fair use, needn’t take the risk of proceeding without permission, and needn’t err on the side of non-use. By the way, the grid you mentioned was merely a preview of a longer article, which explained the gratis/libre distinction in much more detail."]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-access publishing academic-culture openness heroes</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:92eab8043e89/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:heroes"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thepowerofopen.org/downloads/">
    <title>The Power of Open</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-01T11:55:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://thepowerofopen.org/downloads/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Below, the book is available for PDF download in a variety of languages. Check back soon, as more languages are on the way."]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-access publishing book disintermediation-in-action to-do</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:d4981c7c755f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:book"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-in-action"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-do"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://researchremix.wordpress.com/2011/05/30/prelim-finding-hold-outs/">
    <title>Prelim Finding the holdouts: Who is Required to publicly archive data but still doesn’t? « Research Remix</title>
    <dc:date>2011-06-05T22:15:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://researchremix.wordpress.com/2011/05/30/prelim-finding-hold-outs/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["So it seems the specific words in a journal policy that requires data archiving doesn’t matter much, though policies that include a general statement about data sharing and request the sharing of other datatypes have higher rates of data archiving.  The highest-impact journals that require data archiving have slightly higher archiving rates than those with impact factors between 4 and 7.  Mentioning exceptions in a journal policy may be associated with increased rates of archiving.  Core clinical journals tend toward high rates of data archiving (likely overlap with the high impact factor journals).

Disheartening to see again that studies about cancer are least likely to publicly archive data, even when required.  Some disciplinary trends:  studies on bacteria more likely to follow journal mandates.  Perhaps related:  studies that archived other types of data were more likely to also archive gene expression microarray data."]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-access data-access raw-data-now academic-culture publishing</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:859aac3d323d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:data-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:raw-data-now"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://philosophysmoker.blogspot.com/2011/05/crowd-sourcing-peer-review-free-open.html">
    <title>The Philosophy Smoker: Crowd sourcing peer review? Free open access?</title>
    <dc:date>2011-06-05T20:58:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://philosophysmoker.blogspot.com/2011/05/crowd-sourcing-peer-review-free-open.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The idea is to create an open-access online philosophy journal (and then journals in other disciplines), with the peer review process crowd sourced. As many reviewers as want to read a paper can vote to accept/reject, with brief comments. Accepted papers will immediately be published online.

From what I can see, the open access will be free for authors. They are now recruiting reviewers.

Interesting idea."]]></description>
<dc:subject>academic-culture publishing peer-review open-access disintermediation-in-action</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:1712dfed777f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:peer-review"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-in-action"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://api.plos.org/">
    <title>PLoS API</title>
    <dc:date>2011-06-01T11:40:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://api.plos.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The new PLoS Search API gives developers access to rich data that can be flexibly integrated into applications for the web, desktop or mobile devices. It allows PLoS content to be queried using any of the fields in the PLoS Search engine. By opening the PLoS content and data through this API, we hope to encourage the development of tools that will improve the way PLoS users discover and interact with our (and their) content."]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:Pedro-Mendes PLOS open-access API academic-publishing disintermediation-in-action</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:bb76cd4708a3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:Pedro-Mendes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:PLOS"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:API"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-in-action"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.foundhistory.org/2010/12/02/stuff-digital-humanists-like/">
    <title>Stuff Digital Humanists Like: Defining Digital Humanities by its Values</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-20T12:09:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.foundhistory.org/2010/12/02/stuff-digital-humanists-like/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Here are five to start us off:

Like: Twitter / Don’t like: Facebook. The first thing we have to mention, which we have mentioned a few times already, is Twitter. The reasons we like Twitter are complex and I won’t pretend to understand them all, but I’ll throw out a few suggestions. First, its “follow” rather than “friend” model is more open, allows for the collaboration and non-hierarchy that the Internet and digital humanities values. Second, and related to this, Twitter is the place where content-creators—journalists, writers, artists, web developers, etc.—tend to hang out. We overlap with those communities, or at least seek to overlap with them, in productive ways. They are the distant nodes from which we hope new innovations will come. Third, Twitter, in the way we use it, is mostly about sharing ideas whereas Facebook is about sharing relationships. Scholars are good at ideas, maybe less so at relationships.
Like: Agile development / Dislike: long planning cycles. The second thing I’ll mention is agile development, the philosophy of “releasing early and often,” which we do not only with software/code but also with our ideas and writing when we Tweet, blog, and chat. We do this as good neighbors but also in the hope that releasing our code and ideas will improve with contributions from end points of our networks.
Like: DIY / Dislike: Outsourcing. Most of the most successful digital humanities projects are those done by scholar/technologists not those imagined by scholars and implemented by technologists. Likewise, the most successful digital humanists are scholars who know the technology, often those who are self-taught, not ones who seek a client-vendor relationship with technologists. We take this insight to heart in our hiring at CHNM, looking for people with formal training in the humanities and self-taught tech skills.
Like: PHP / Dislike: C++. Fourth, and following from the last point, we like PHP not C++. This is another way of saying we like the transparent, easy-to-learn, and simple (if sometimes ham-handed) technologies of the Web more than the more powerful, more sophisticated, more elegant, but less approachable compiled code of the desktop. A focus on getting the most out of simple, transparent, vernacular technologies allows us to keep the door to the field open to new entrants.
Like: Extramural funding / Dislike: Intramural funding. In one respect, this may seem obvious: everybody likes grants. In another respect it’s probably going a little too far to say we don’t like intramural funding: it is essential to building and maintaining capacity for our centers and staff. But it seems to me the most successful digital humanities projects are those that result from competitive grant making processes, especially the federal grant making process. Why is this? I can point to at least three reasons: 1) Attracting grant money keeps us innovating, which, like it or not, is a premium in our business. Grants are given for new work, not for more of the same. 2) Writing grants and serving on panels keep us in conversation with the field. We have to keep current and keep in touch with one another to justify our projects to grantmakers and to recommend others’ projects for funding. Increasingly, funding guidelines themselves require collaboration. 3) Unlike much traditional scholarship, which often requires one big deliverable (a book) after years of close-kept study, research, and writing, grant work requires defining and meeting a set of closely timed, concrete deliverables, a mode of work which encourages the kind of agile development so valued by the Internet and digital humanities community."]]></description>
<dc:subject>digital-humanities cultural-norms open-access openness network-culture</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:7fdcea57e1d2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:digital-humanities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:network-culture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://nationbuilder.com/politicalforce">
    <title>NationBuilder Launches Free Campaign Access to Nationwide Voter File</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-17T20:43:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://nationbuilder.com/politicalforce</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Political FORCE offers a robust data analysis platform for campaigns, and is offering full access to its file of 182 million registered voters as a free service to all NationBuilder subscribers, in compliance with applicable laws limiting access to authorized entities for political purposes. Starting immediately, candidates can sign up for NationBuilder with full, free access to their voter data at NationBuilder.com."]]></description>
<dc:subject>raw-data-now open-access politics disintermediation-in-action nice</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:470c524f1451/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:raw-data-now"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-in-action"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:nice"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://placr.co.uk/blog/2011/05/why-train-departure-information-is-not-currently-open-data/">
    <title>Why train departure information is not currently open data « Placr News</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-16T10:47:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://placr.co.uk/blog/2011/05/why-train-departure-information-is-not-currently-open-data/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Going back in history, until February 2009 ATOC licensed train departure information under commercial terms to a very small number of organisations, mostly within the rail industry. Kizoom published the only smartphone app at that time, the free MyRailLite for iPhone. Then a dispute arose between ATOC and Kizoom, and ATOC withdrew Kizoom’s licence to use the train departure information. Kizoom complained to the ORR, who conducted an investigation (PDF) into whether ATOC had abused a dominant position under competition law. ORR decided that ATOC did have a dominant position in the supply of train departure information, but they “found no evidence that ATOC’s conduct in granting access to Darwin had prevented a new product from coming to market or hampered the emergence of new technology” in November 2009. When the free MyRailLite from Kizoom was taken off the market, it was immediately replaced by a £5 iPhone app from Agant which was marketed under the National Rail Enquiries brand.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>enclosures open-access raw-data-now infrastructure government2.0</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:aeaf0b47ceab/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:enclosures"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:raw-data-now"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:infrastructure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:government2.0"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://infovegan.com/2010/08/09/how-did-weather-data-get-opened">
    <title>How did Weather Data Get Opened? - A Healthy Information Diet - InfoVegan.com</title>
    <dc:date>2010-08-12T23:58:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://infovegan.com/2010/08/09/how-did-weather-data-get-opened</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Weather data didn’t come to be because of an Open Government Directive. It wasn’t created because of a White House mandate. Government did not release the data and then enterprising people built companies on top of it. It’s more accurate to make the argument that we have a national weather service because of one man’s deep desire to keep his job and to get promoted to colonel in the Army. It could be a vast network of lobbyists to help that man get promoted, or the vast network of lobbyists from shipping companies trying to get access to data already being created. Or it could be that it was just pretty obvious that access to weather data would save lives."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>weather open-access data-analysis big-data-will-lead-to-big-inference public-policy marketing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:87aaf0eef1f6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:weather"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:data-analysis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:big-data-will-lead-to-big-inference"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:marketing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.pawelszczesny.org/2010/08/02/open-data-citation-advantage/">
    <title>» Open Data citation advantage Circle of Complexity</title>
    <dc:date>2010-08-10T11:43:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.pawelszczesny.org/2010/08/02/open-data-citation-advantage/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Because sharing data resulted in a citation, I wonder how long will it take for Open Data advocates to start using this “open data citation advantage” as an argument for sharing data?"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>citation-etiquette economics open-access open-science open-data social-engineering academic-culture</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:805412a3b81b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:citation-etiquette"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-engineering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.google.com/googlebooks/uspto.html">
    <title>USPTO Bulk Downloads</title>
    <dc:date>2010-06-05T19:39:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.google.com/googlebooks/uspto.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Google and the USPTO have entered into an agreement to make the following USPTO products available to the public at no charge:

Patents (grants, applications, assignments, classification information, and maintenance fee events)
Trademarks (grants, applications, assignments, and TTAB proceedings)

All data originated from the USPTO. Google is hosting this data unchanged, except for repackaging into zip files."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>patents intellectual-property open-access raw-data-now government2.0 social-networks law datasets nudge-targets natural-language-processing manfred-macx-approves</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:84697f9c8e61/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:raw-data-now"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:government2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:datasets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:nudge-targets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:natural-language-processing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:manfred-macx-approves"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2010/04/we-learn.html">
    <title>Half an Hour: We Learn</title>
    <dc:date>2010-04-05T19:02:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2010/04/we-learn.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["They attempt to co-opt nascent OER initiatives by directing them toward commercial enterprise, arguing that resources must allow commercial licensing, and directing production toward enterprises and initiatives that must receive see funding and draw a return on that investment through the conversion of OERs into commodities.

And they foster a sense of incapacity in opinion and the media to suggest to students themselves that they are incapable of independent action without the comforting support of corporations and institutions, that they are simply not capable of learning form themselves. From the first utterance that "OCW is not an MIT education" the suggestion has been that education must need be a high-priced endeavour, available, really, only to those willing to pay the price."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-access DIY education academic-culture disintermediation-in-action orthogonal-culture edupunk</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:fd2a90540371/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:DIY"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-in-action"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:orthogonal-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:edupunk"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.boingboing.net/2010/03/08/lawrence-lessig-scar-1.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+boingboing%2FiBag+(Boing+Boing)">
    <title>Lawrence Lessig scares a room of liberals - Boing Boing</title>
    <dc:date>2010-03-09T14:32:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.boingboing.net/2010/03/08/lawrence-lessig-scar-1.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+boingboing%2FiBag+(Boing+Boing)</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["There's plenty to argue about here and he presents in black and white some issues that are full of grays, but chances are you won't spend 20 minutes today with a smarter person. It's worth watching and thinking about …"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>openness open-access copyright intellectual-property politics conservatism rights lessig</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:00041ee9dd33/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conservatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rights"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:lessig"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/posts/gregory/020-rbp-ch6.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+RubyBestPractices+(Ruby+Best+Practices+-+Blog)">
    <title>Ruby Best Practices - Ruby Tuesdays: RBP Chapter 6</title>
    <dc:date>2010-03-07T22:14:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/posts/gregory/020-rbp-ch6.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+RubyBestPractices+(Ruby+Best+Practices+-+Blog)</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Readers are encouraged to fight RBP as they read it, rather than just soaking up the information. Although I claim this book is about “Best Practices”, the only reason that is true is that it’s a result of countless conversations with folks who are deep in the Ruby trenches getting stuff done. The only way for RBP to remain current and relevant is to continue these discussions, using its content as a jumping off point for fresh ideas."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-access software-development ruby best-practices programming O'Reilly conversation-trumps-lecturing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:d13e7d8739fc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:software-development"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:ruby"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:best-practices"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:O'Reilly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conversation-trumps-lecturing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://scienceblogs.com/effectmeasure/2010/02/the_copyright_mafia_makes_me_s.php">
    <title>The copyright mafia makes me scream (again) : Effect Measure</title>
    <dc:date>2010-02-25T13:32:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://scienceblogs.com/effectmeasure/2010/02/the_copyright_mafia_makes_me_s.php</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I don't know about you, but for most of us "the best solution available in the market" is the one that costs the least and does what I want it to. If it's free, even better. Can we say "Google"?"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>intellectual-property copyright openness open-access culture-war corporatism transparency transparency-it-ain't</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:5003ba4f5900/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:culture-war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:corporatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:transparency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:transparency-it-ain't"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.gale.cengage.com/fairaccess/index.htm">
    <title>An open letter to the library community</title>
    <dc:date>2010-01-23T14:16:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.gale.cengage.com/fairaccess/index.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["What does this mean to you?

If you currently receive Time Inc. or Forbes periodical content electronically from Gale or any provider other than EBSCO, you and your patrons will lose access to that content over the next year. While there will remain alternative, high-quality titles in all information providers' products, there will be an impact on users, especially those who access content through long-term statewide subscriptions."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>intellectual-property license-agreement open-access libraries business-model-failure access competition capital types-of</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:7369f35b129f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:license-agreement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:libraries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-model-failure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:competition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:capital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:types-of"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6709919.html">
    <title>With a Little Help: Can You Hear Me Now? - 12/7/2009 - Publishers Weekly</title>
    <dc:date>2009-12-15T13:05:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6709919.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I can understand why a retailer would want to use my copyright as bait to lock in readers—but exactly how is this good for me? This is why I'm not selling digital downloads of the professional readings of With a Little Help. With so much friction and goofiness in the marketplace, I'd rather give the MP3s away under a Creative Commons license and solicit donations through PayPal. My listeners don't want DRM. They want to get their books with a minimum of hassle. But, for the record, I'd put my books in Audible and the iTunes Store in a hot second if only they'd sell them on the same terms that I'd be willing to buy them: no DRM and no license agreement except “don't violate copyright law.”"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>copyright intellectual-property lawyers Apple DRM openness open-access culture-clash business-model-failure disintermediation-targets</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:65be8f8d3765/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:lawyers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:DRM"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:culture-clash"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-model-failure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-targets"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/11/12/mpaa-shuts-down-enti.html">
    <title>MPAA shuts down entire town's muni WiFi over a single download - Boing Boing</title>
    <dc:date>2009-11-12T15:50:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.boingboing.net/2009/11/12/mpaa-shuts-down-enti.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The MPAA has successfully shut down an entire town's municipal WiFi because a single user was found to be downloading a copyrighted movie. Rather than being embarrassed by this gross example of collective punishment (a practice outlawed in the Geneva conventions) against Coshocton, OH, the MPAA's spokeslizard took the opportunity to cry poor (even though the studios are bringing in record box-office and aftermarket receipts)."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>RIAA intellectual-property rights copyright stupidity WiFi open-access infrastructure community command-and-control</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:f60a1e2a8cf3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:RIAA"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rights"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:stupidity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:WiFi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:infrastructure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:command-and-control"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>