<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (Vaguery)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from Vaguery</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://psmag.com/social-justice/no-metoo-is-not-a-witch-hunt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://theestablishment.co/when-a-woman-deletes-a-mans-comment-online-4da77027ac60"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/7/18/15992226/neoliberalism-chait-austerity-democratic-party-sanders-clinton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pankisseskafka.com/2013/12/30/the-post-academics-guide-to-academic-professionalism/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://wordmunger.com/?p=1236"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/01/12/atomization.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.deusexmalcontent.com/2009/11/boone-were-only-white-people-here.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://edgeofthewest.wordpress.com/2008/06/09/things-that-it-has-been-empirically-demonstrated-academics-do-not-know/"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://psmag.com/social-justice/no-metoo-is-not-a-witch-hunt">
    <title>No, #MeToo Is Not a Witch Hunt - Pacific Standard</title>
    <dc:date>2018-01-09T14:21:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://psmag.com/social-justice/no-metoo-is-not-a-witch-hunt</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The #MeToo movement is not a witch hunt. It's not a lynch mob. It's not like the Holocaust, Japanese Internment, McCarthyism, or the Inquisition. Every time we get a little bit closer to holding powerful men accountable for their actions, bad historical metaphors tumble forth from people who are eager to appear to be concerned about overreach and due process. Overreach is always possible. Due process is important. But comparisons that equate holding the powerful accountable with the systematic persecution of marginalized people are both offensive and intended to obfuscate the truth. #MeToo is a rebellion against the kinds of entrenched powers that persecute; it is not an act of persecution.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>discourse cultural-norms media-coverage rhetoric essay reactionaries</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:14ffb1422767/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:discourse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:media-coverage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rhetoric"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:essay"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:reactionaries"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://theestablishment.co/when-a-woman-deletes-a-mans-comment-online-4da77027ac60">
    <title>When A Woman Deletes A Man’s Comment Online – The Establishment</title>
    <dc:date>2017-09-19T11:41:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://theestablishment.co/when-a-woman-deletes-a-mans-comment-online-4da77027ac60</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Many western debates have had a strong element of privilege running throughout their history. To be able to imbibe at a salon, stand at a podium, or sit at a roundtable while sparring about the minutia of important issues requires a surplus of time, a dispassionate objectivity, and a platform that many don’t have the luxury of possessing around issues that can be life or death. We live in a world where the most hotly debated issues surround questions of women’s rights, health care, racism and racial oppression, immigration, trans rights, reproductive rights, and religious discrimination. To be able to take issues fundamental to the health and safety of millions of people and turn them into sport where winners and losers are decided by talking points requires some level of insulation from the negative impacts of the outcome in order to enjoy participating.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>privilege social-norms social-media essay American-cultural-assumptions discourse</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:8f826c4e2383/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:privilege"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:essay"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:American-cultural-assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:discourse"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/7/18/15992226/neoliberalism-chait-austerity-democratic-party-sanders-clinton">
    <title>“Neoliberalism” isn’t an empty epithet. It’s a real, powerful set of ideas. - Vox</title>
    <dc:date>2017-07-21T13:15:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/7/18/15992226/neoliberalism-chait-austerity-democratic-party-sanders-clinton</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[You may not believe in neoliberalism, but neoliberalism believes in you
Why does this matter if you couldn’t care less about either the IMF or subjectivity? The 2016 election brought forward real disagreements in the Democratic Party, disagreements that aren’t reducible to empirical arguments, or arguments about what an achievable political agenda might be. These disagreements will become more important as we move forward, and they can only be answered with an understanding of what the Democratic Party stands for.

One highly salient conflict was the fight over free college during the Democratic primary. It wasn’t about the price tag; it was about the role the government should play in helping to educate the citizenry. Clinton originally argued that a universal program would help people who didn’t need help — why pay for Donald Trump’s kids? This reflects the focus on means-tested programs that dominated Democratic policymaking over the past several decades. (Some of the original people who wanted to reinvent the Democratic Party, such as Charles Peters in his 1983 article “A Neoliberal’s Manifesto,” called for means-testing Social Security so it served only the very poor.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>neoliberalism capitalism politics postnormality economics public-policy discourse</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:5d3dba02261f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:neoliberalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:postnormality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:discourse"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://pankisseskafka.com/2013/12/30/the-post-academics-guide-to-academic-professionalism/">
    <title>The Post-Academic’s Guide to Academic Professionalism | pan kisses kafka</title>
    <dc:date>2014-01-01T12:26:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://pankisseskafka.com/2013/12/30/the-post-academics-guide-to-academic-professionalism/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Literally the last thing any marginalized academic should be worried about at any time is hurting the feelings of someone with tenure. That person already has 900 times more privileges (and much more money) than you will ever have. The fact that they also demand you treat them with awed deference should not have an effect on your behavior.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>academic-culture disintermediation-in-action adjuncts discourse civility-as-tactic</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:100940f6d662/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-in-action"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:adjuncts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:discourse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:civility-as-tactic"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://wordmunger.com/?p=1236">
    <title>Civility and Incivility, Truth and Fiction at #scio10</title>
    <dc:date>2010-01-22T15:42:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://wordmunger.com/?p=1236</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Each of the presenters gave a nice, thoughtful, 5-minute talk about their views on the issue, but what everyone was waiting for was the fireworks when open discussion began. For a while the discussion was tame enough, with everyone exchanging platitudes about how they view the issues. But then things got a LOT more heated...."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>social-norms science academic-culture online ironism-FAIL discourse argument personal-brand disintermediation-in-action</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:d4394b3510c3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:ironism-FAIL"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:discourse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:argument"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:personal-brand"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-in-action"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/01/12/atomization.html">
    <title>PressThink: Audience Atomization Overcome: Why the Internet Weakens the Authority of the Press</title>
    <dc:date>2010-01-21T14:06:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/01/12/atomization.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In the age of mass media, the press was able to define the sphere of legitimate debate with relative ease because the people on the receiving end were atomized-- connected "up" to Big Media but not across to each other. And now that authority is eroding. I will try to explain why.
It’s easily the most useful diagram I’ve found for understanding the practice of journalism in the United States, and the hidden politics of that practice. You can draw it by hand right now. Take a sheet of paper and make a big circle in the middle. In the center of that circle draw a smaller one to create a doughnut shape. Label the doughnut hole “sphere of consensus.” Call the middle region “sphere of legitimate debate,” and the outer region “sphere of deviance.”"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>journalism media social-norms social-dynamics discourse politics communication criticism authority newspapers analysis consensus disintermediation-targets</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:c1eb7ca143e2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-dynamics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:discourse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:newspapers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:analysis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:consensus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-targets"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.deusexmalcontent.com/2009/11/boone-were-only-white-people-here.html">
    <title>Deus Ex Malcontent: &quot;Boone, We're the Only White People Here&quot;</title>
    <dc:date>2009-11-05T21:54:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.deusexmalcontent.com/2009/11/boone-were-only-white-people-here.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["And now, not surprisingly, they refer to him and his family as insects -- "unwelcome creatures" infesting the White House that require quick and absolute extermination so that the natural order of things can be restored. 

Newsmax should be wary of printing this kind of crap right now, given that just a few weeks ago they rushed, uncharacteristically red-faced, to take down a post which seemed to advocate a military coup against the president of the United States. I'd have to assume its only Pat Boone's status as a walking punchline that's leading them to leave his own bit of eliminationist wishful thinking up on their site for the moment. Regardless of who says it, though, it's wrong to beat the drum this loudly against a sitting president, to show the office -- not simply the man and his family, but the office -- so little respect. "
]]></description>
<dc:subject>Civil-War politics conservatism discourse extremism extreme-values-are-no-longer-the-end-of-the-distribution</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:03cc7dc80ff6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Civil-War"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conservatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:discourse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:extremism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:extreme-values-are-no-longer-the-end-of-the-distribution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://edgeofthewest.wordpress.com/2008/06/09/things-that-it-has-been-empirically-demonstrated-academics-do-not-know/">
    <title>Things that it has been empirically demonstrated academics do not know. « The Edge of the American West</title>
    <dc:date>2008-06-16T12:37:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://edgeofthewest.wordpress.com/2008/06/09/things-that-it-has-been-empirically-demonstrated-academics-do-not-know/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>via:arthegall academia cultural-norms discourse etiquette self-knowledge</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:897eb3b690e1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:arthegall"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:discourse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:etiquette"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:self-knowledge"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>