<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (Vaguery)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from Vaguery</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/the-value-of-openness-in-scientific-problem-solving"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://aeon.co/ideas/what-i-learned-as-a-hired-consultant-for-autodidact-physicists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theawl.com/2015/06/the-new-york-times-and-criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.richard-hall.org/2014/06/19/on-mutual-values-and-open-co-operativism/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://itself.wordpress.com/2014/11/10/why-do-we-do-courses/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://unrealnature.wordpress.com/2014/11/10/on-its-head/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://understandingsociety.blogspot.com/2014/11/the-luminaries-and-researcher.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://lemire.me/blog/archives/2014/07/07/true-success-is-more-than-winning-a-zero-sum-game/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ivory.idyll.org/blog/blog-practicing-open-science.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.quora.com/Academia/How-are-PhD-programs-responding-to-the-academic-job-crisis?srid=dA&amp;share=1"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://futureofscipub.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/open-post-publication-peer-review/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.newgeography.com/content/002938-religion-and-city"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kauffman.org/newsroom/fractional-scholarship-could-unravel-scientific-questions-and-grow-the-economy.aspx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/eotopico86.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://punctumbooks.com/blog/everything-we-think-can-in-principle-be-thought-by-someone-else-a-plea-for-open-scholarship/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070503/012939.shtml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.readwriteweb.com/start/2010/08/the-8-legal-steps-to-starting-a-startup.php?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+readwriteweb+(ReadWriteWeb)"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L3C"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/10/co-inventors-co.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://freesci.wordpress.com/2008/01/14/freelance-freedom/"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/the-value-of-openness-in-scientific-problem-solving">
    <title>The Value of Openness in Scientific Problem Solving - Harvard Business School Working Knowledge</title>
    <dc:date>2020-05-02T13:07:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/the-value-of-openness-in-scientific-problem-solving</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Openness and free information sharing amongst scientists are supposed to be core norms of the scientific community. However, many studies have shown that these norms are not universally followed. Lack of openness and transparency means that scientific problem solving is constrained to a few scientists who work in secret and who typically fail to leverage the entire accumulation of scientific knowledge available. We present evidence of the efficacy of problem solving when disclosing problem information. The method's application to 166 discrete scientific problems from the research laboratories of 26 firms is illustrated. Problems were disclosed to over 80,000 independent scientists from over 150 countries. We show that disclosure of problem information to a large group of outside solvers is an effective means of solving scientific problems. The approach solved one-third of a sample of problems that large and well-known R&D-intensive firms had been unsuccessful in solving internally. Problem-solving success was found to be associated with the ability to attract specialized solvers with range of diverse scientific interests. Furthermore, successful solvers solved problems at the boundary or outside of their fields of expertise, indicating a transfer of knowledge from one field to others.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>openness open-access publishing academic-culture Coscience to-write-about</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:c02ae04934ab/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Coscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://aeon.co/ideas/what-i-learned-as-a-hired-consultant-for-autodidact-physicists">
    <title>What I learned as a hired consultant to autodidact physicists | Aeon Ideas</title>
    <dc:date>2016-08-20T11:32:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://aeon.co/ideas/what-i-learned-as-a-hired-consultant-for-autodidact-physicists</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[few months passed, my new job began, and I didn’t have time any more to take on the calls. Emails piled up in my inbox. With some hesitation, I posted a note on Facebook asking if anybody with a PhD in physics would be interested making a little money on the side. Within two hours I had a dozen replies; there are a lot of underpaid postdocs and lecturers out there. I now have a small team of consultants on the ‘talk to a physicist’ service. None of us makes great money, and I don’t think we ever will because the market is too small. But broken down to dollars or euros per hour, I’ve had many freelance writing jobs that paid worse.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>academic-culture system-of-professions coscience pseudoscience psychoceramics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:b8588da71f4f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:system-of-professions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:coscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pseudoscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:psychoceramics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theawl.com/2015/06/the-new-york-times-and-criticism">
    <title>Alessandra Stanley and the Diminishment of Criticism - The Awl</title>
    <dc:date>2015-06-24T22:00:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theawl.com/2015/06/the-new-york-times-and-criticism</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[And it’s terrific to breathe a bit of air into the department of critics. Critics are long-serving, and they are uniform as hell. Other departments are also getting a slow and deliberate shake-up. It’s needed. But nothing will meet with as much celebration as the departure of Stanley. Except… who will we kick around now? Oh don’t be silly, we’ll find someone!

]]></description>
<dc:subject>criticism object-lessons worklife Coscience</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:0be518f90af0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:object-lessons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:worklife"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Coscience"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.richard-hall.org/2014/06/19/on-mutual-values-and-open-co-operativism/">
    <title>on mutual values and open co-operativism | Richard Hall's Space</title>
    <dc:date>2015-02-10T12:26:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.richard-hall.org/2014/06/19/on-mutual-values-and-open-co-operativism/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This is a long-read, at over 5,400 words. Why not read and listen to this lovely Frankie Knuckles’ Boiler Room set?

]]></description>
<dc:subject>cooperation social-norms academic-culture disintermediation-in-action Coscience to-read</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:38160e1e3f44/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cooperation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-in-action"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Coscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-read"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://itself.wordpress.com/2014/11/10/why-do-we-do-courses/">
    <title>Why do we do courses? | An und für sich</title>
    <dc:date>2014-11-13T23:27:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://itself.wordpress.com/2014/11/10/why-do-we-do-courses/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[In short, it seems like the format was devised for a particular kind of privileged student, and it isn’t even very forgiving for those people. I might be okay with this if there was some kind of positive pedagogical justification for the format, but I’m not sure there really is.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>academic-culture academia pedagogy the-why-of-it classwork worklife systemic-risks disintermediation-targets what-could-one-do-differently Coscience</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:86de56b0f494/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:the-why-of-it"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:classwork"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:worklife"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:systemic-risks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-targets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:what-could-one-do-differently"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Coscience"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://unrealnature.wordpress.com/2014/11/10/on-its-head/">
    <title>On Its Head | Unreal Nature</title>
    <dc:date>2014-11-12T13:08:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://unrealnature.wordpress.com/2014/11/10/on-its-head/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[… Because of its focus on singularity, the monograph carried the potential of turning the study of art on its head. It could throw into doubt any number of more rigid constructions. It contained points of excess, instability, and differentiation that could not be so easily squared. It exposed as limited and arbitrary the assumption that artworks can be better evaluated when classified according to schools and countries and seen as parts of a linear, chronological history. It indicated that the construction of art historical sequences and genealogies among artists might not be enough to unravel the artistic phenomena. It shook the faith in external, homogenizing criteria that seek to prescribe or ascribe what art is.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>literary-criticism monographs cultural-norms cultural-assumptions the-mangle-in-practice consider:engineering Coscience</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:e5279b5aaf34/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:literary-criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:monographs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:the-mangle-in-practice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:consider:engineering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Coscience"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://understandingsociety.blogspot.com/2014/11/the-luminaries-and-researcher.html">
    <title>Understanding Society: The luminaries and the researcher</title>
    <dc:date>2014-11-09T13:35:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://understandingsociety.blogspot.com/2014/11/the-luminaries-and-researcher.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[So the position I am led to is this. Social research requires theories of how social processes work. It would be foolish to ignore the excellent work of theorizing various aspects of the social world offered by the luminaries. But it would also be foolish to imagine that any one of these theoretical frameworks is total and complete. Rather, the researcher should be eclectic, pluralistic, and curious when it comes to making use of social theory to make sense of a particular range of complex social activity.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>worklife social-norms sociology Coscience disintermediation-targets hey-I-know-this-guy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:efaf1212cfe8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:worklife"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sociology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Coscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-targets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:hey-I-know-this-guy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://lemire.me/blog/archives/2014/07/07/true-success-is-more-than-winning-a-zero-sum-game/">
    <title>True success is more than winning a zero-sum game</title>
    <dc:date>2014-07-08T12:30:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://lemire.me/blog/archives/2014/07/07/true-success-is-more-than-winning-a-zero-sum-game/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I believe that people like to tell themselves simple stories about how one should succeed. Many of these simple stories are based on half-truths. Just like how fiction authors believe that they must land a competitive book deal to be a writer whereas none of us care about any of that. This status ranking game that you play… is probably much less important than you make it out to be on the long run.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>worklife disintermediation-in-action the-postnormal-creeps-in publishing coscience moral-economy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:75a925ef7308/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:worklife"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-in-action"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:the-postnormal-creeps-in"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:coscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:moral-economy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ivory.idyll.org/blog/blog-practicing-open-science.html">
    <title>Why I don't &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; practice open science</title>
    <dc:date>2013-05-21T23:16:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://ivory.idyll.org/blog/blog-practicing-open-science.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Overall, it's been an interesting personal journey from "blind optimism" about openness to a more, ahem, "nuanced" set of thoughts (i.e., I was wrong before :). I'd be interested to hear what other people have to say... drop me a note or make a comment.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>openness open-science folks-I-know coscience the-mangle-in-practice other-people-are-part-of-the-mangle</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a6bacb8255a2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:folks-I-know"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:coscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:the-mangle-in-practice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:other-people-are-part-of-the-mangle"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.quora.com/Academia/How-are-PhD-programs-responding-to-the-academic-job-crisis?srid=dA&amp;share=1">
    <title>Academia: How are PhD programs responding to the academic job crisis? - Quora</title>
    <dc:date>2013-03-08T21:32:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.quora.com/Academia/How-are-PhD-programs-responding-to-the-academic-job-crisis?srid=dA&amp;share=1</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Academia: How are PhD programs responding to the academic job crisis?

The ratio of tenure track jobs to new PhDs has dropped dramatically, and while it might improve, it probably will never get back to the point where most PhDs have a chance of obtaining one.  Are there any academic PhD programs which are responding to this crisis in innovative ways?]]></description>
<dc:subject>academia academic-culture jobs worklife disintermediation-targets disintermediation-in-action Coscience</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:05e50476c12b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:jobs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:worklife"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-targets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-in-action"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Coscience"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://futureofscipub.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/open-post-publication-peer-review/">
    <title>The future of scientific publishing: Open post-publication peer review « The future of scientific publishing</title>
    <dc:date>2012-07-25T18:42:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://futureofscipub.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/open-post-publication-peer-review/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Post-publication: Reviews are submitted after publication, because the paper needs to be publicly accessible in order for any scientist to be able to review it. Post-publication reviews can add evaluative information to papers published in the current system (which have already been secretly reviewed before publication). For example, a highly controversial paper appearing in Science may motivate a number of supportive and critical post-publication reviews. The overall evaluation from these public reviews will affect the attention given to the paper by potential readers. The actual text of the reviews may help readers understand and judge the details of the paper."]]></description>
<dc:subject>peer-review open-science collaboration publishing to-do coscience</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:d89e3bd456d0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:peer-review"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-do"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:coscience"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.newgeography.com/content/002938-religion-and-city">
    <title>Religion and the City | Newgeography.com</title>
    <dc:date>2012-07-01T11:11:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.newgeography.com/content/002938-religion-and-city</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["He talks about items ranging from multicultural sensitivities to taking the arts serious to “being famous for helping the poor.” The latter was an item that jumped out at me because, as I’ve noted before, too many urbanist arguments are basically arguments for what I call “Starbucks urbanism.” If called on this, people will say, “But of course transit will benefit the poor too.” But that’s not how it’s sold. Urbanists ought to be famous for the way they design, implement, and talk about their policies as instruments for helping the poor and facilitating upward economic and social mobility. There’s a lot of other good stuff in the video that’s relevant to urbanism.

For those who prefer reading, Keller also wrote a paper called “Our New Global Culture: Ministry in Cities, which says of itself: “This paper surveys the rise of global cities, the culture and dominant worldviews within these cities, and a framework for ministering in them.”?]]></description>
<dc:subject>city-planning organization marketing Workantile Coscience outreach diversity management</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:51e092a9b6cf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:city-planning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:organization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:marketing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Workantile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Coscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:outreach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:diversity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:management"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kauffman.org/newsroom/fractional-scholarship-could-unravel-scientific-questions-and-grow-the-economy.aspx">
    <title>'Fractional Scholarship' Could Unravel Scientific Questions and Grow the Economy, According to Kauffman Report</title>
    <dc:date>2012-06-05T12:07:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kauffman.org/newsroom/fractional-scholarship-could-unravel-scientific-questions-and-grow-the-economy.aspx</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["However, the report cautions, it is nearly impossible for individuals to become lone fractional scholars. For fractional scholarship to be feasible, institutions must step forward to provide affiliations and resources, aggregate grant support and management, and establish research communities that allow scholars to interact online and in person. The institutions would benefit from the affiliation with scholars, who would spend all of their funded time on research, operating at a much lower cost than a typical university professor can."]]></description>
<dc:subject>coscience disintermediation-targets academic-culture</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:927a5c08f573/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:coscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-targets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/eotopico86.pdf">
    <title>[PDF] discussion of &quot;scientific research&quot; by 501(c)(3) nonprofits</title>
    <dc:date>2011-10-14T10:56:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/eotopico86.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>Coscience nonprofit tax law</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a6a98301d65c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Coscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:nonprofit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:tax"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:law"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://punctumbooks.com/blog/everything-we-think-can-in-principle-be-thought-by-someone-else-a-plea-for-open-scholarship/">
    <title>Everything We Think Can in Principle Be Thought By Someone Else: A Plea for Open Scholarship</title>
    <dc:date>2011-09-25T22:26:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://punctumbooks.com/blog/everything-we-think-can-in-principle-be-thought-by-someone-else-a-plea-for-open-scholarship/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["This is just to say that if we think keeping our scholarly work primarily out of public sight [except for the occasional conference presentation] until its penultimate moment of publication in a conventional venue such as the academic journal or book, at which point quite a few years of our lives [mainly spent in the solitude of studies and libraries or other semi-private spaces where we could manage a foothold] may have been devoted to that work whose “arrival” in print may even occur long after we have moved on to other projects, then we risk working too much in the dark, apart from the world which has bequeathed to us our objects and methods of study and reflection [I might also add here that this traditional way of doing things also keeps our work sequestered within the academy, and does not allow us to reach a more broadly public audience, which, in my mind, is a real perversion of the term "humanities"]. We also do our work largely apart from the very peers whom we hope will welcome and even love it when it is “finished.” Yes, for the kind of work we do, quiet is required, even long stretches of solitude [because this is when ideas often arrive to us that could never have arrived any other way and also because it's hard to translate medieval Latin when people are milling all around you], but you’ve got to get outside every now then. And maybe also reflect on the fact that even the supposed inside/outside divide is primarily an illusion."]]></description>
<dc:subject>academic-culture openness publishing gatekeeping coscience</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:cb7b758bbb24/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:gatekeeping"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:coscience"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070503/012939.shtml">
    <title>The Grand Unified Theory On The Economics Of Free | Techdirt</title>
    <dc:date>2010-10-03T15:51:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070503/012939.shtml</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Once you've broken out the components, however, recognizing that the infinite components are what make the scarce components more valuable at no extra cost, you set those free. Not only do you set those free, you have every incentive to create more of them, and encourage more people to get them. You break them into easily accessible bites. You syndicate them. You hand them out. You make them easy to share and embed and distribute and promote.…"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>agalmics economics business-model Coscience answer-factory how-to-make-a-million-whuffie</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:d4227e4ac129/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:agalmics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-model"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Coscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:answer-factory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:how-to-make-a-million-whuffie"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.readwriteweb.com/start/2010/08/the-8-legal-steps-to-starting-a-startup.php?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+readwriteweb+(ReadWriteWeb)">
    <title>The 8 Legal Steps to Creating a Startup</title>
    <dc:date>2010-08-12T23:57:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/start/2010/08/the-8-legal-steps-to-starting-a-startup.php?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+readwriteweb+(ReadWriteWeb)</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["While company filings and regulations may not be the most glamorous parts of your startup, they're absolutely critical to the success of your business and safety of your personal savings. Here's a quick rundown of the laws and regulations you need to consider when creating a startup. Of course, depending on your type of business, hiring a tax accountant or good attorney with specific experience in your industry can go a long way to helping you steer clear of trouble."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>startup-culture-must-improve advice coscience</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:43072e637839/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:startup-culture-must-improve"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:advice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:coscience"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L3C">
    <title>L3C - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia</title>
    <dc:date>2009-09-16T20:27:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L3C</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The L3C is a low-profit limited liability company (LLC), that functions via a business modality that is a hybrid legal structure combining the financial advantages of the limited liability company, an LLC, with the social advantages of a non-profit entity. An L3C runs like a regular business and is profitable. However, unlike a for-profit business, the primary focus of the L3C is not to make money, but to achieve socially beneficial aims, with profit making as a secondary goal. The L3C thus occupies a niche between the for-profit and charitable sectors.
As of September, 2009, an L3C can only be formed in the states of Michigan[1] ,Vermont, Wyoming, Utah, the Crow Indian Nation and the Oglala Sioux Tribe. On August 4, 2009, Gov. Pat Quinn signed Illinois' L3C Bill SBO239 and the law will take effect on January 1, 2010."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>nonprofit ifprofit business-model corporations business Workantile-Exchange Nudge Coscience</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a3765bf29379/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:nonprofit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:ifprofit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-model"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:corporations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Workantile-Exchange"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Nudge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Coscience"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/10/co-inventors-co.html">
    <title>Patent Law Blog (Patently-O): Co-Inventors Contribution Must Be “More Than The Exercise of Ordinary Skill”</title>
    <dc:date>2008-10-28T19:33:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/10/co-inventors-co.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Correcting Inventorship: An issued patent is presumed to name the correct inventors. Thus, an inventorship challenge must bring "clear and convincing evidence" that the newly surfaced inventor "contributed to the conception of the claimed invention." "Simply reducing to practice that which has been conceived by others is insufficient for co-inventorship." Under the clear and convincing standard, the inventorship challenge "must be corroborated by independent evidence.""
]]></description>
<dc:subject>intellectual-property patents engineering collaboration law contracts CoScience rights</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:85ee5b7c9397/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:engineering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:contracts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:CoScience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rights"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://freesci.wordpress.com/2008/01/14/freelance-freedom/">
    <title>Freelance freedom « Freelancing science</title>
    <dc:date>2008-01-15T22:00:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://freesci.wordpress.com/2008/01/14/freelance-freedom/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>NAE Coscience freelancing worklife amusing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:45bd0b9423f0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:NAE"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Coscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:freelancing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:worklife"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:amusing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>